His Dad 100%. Idk about his Mom though. She was overheard at court, after one of the more recent pre-trial hearings, saying something along the lines of “I don’t care what evidence comes out. She did it and will always be guilty in my eyes”… Hopefully someday she’ll be able to see through the 2.5 years of lies, manipulation, and brainwashing that she’s been the victim of at the hands of MSP, CPD, & NCDAO. So sad!
It’s heartbreaking. 💔 So much loss. Everyone talking about their son like he’s a prop. I mean no one means it that way but it’s got to be so difficult for his loved ones.
Man this Attorney IS ONE OF THE BEST IVE EVER SEEN and I was a Paralegal for 16yrs for a criminal defense Attorney! This is hows its done, no wonder she hasnt been worried, if my life was in his hands and i was innocent, i wouldnt worry either. Great job
The DA opening statement was monotone, not in chronological order and very confusing. The defence opening was a riveting, chronological story that was easy to follow and contained important facts. I think the jurors will only remember his opening. May I add this is the tiniest weirdest laid out court room I’ve ever seen to date. 😂
Lally is so out of his depth. We know more about these people’s kids’ sports experience than we do about how KR is supposedly tied to the crime. You can tell Yanetti knows this case inside and out, and his disgust for both the law enforcement and DA’s handling of it is palpable.
Ooo, I’d love a series on openings statements and closing arguments. I rewatch my favorites often anyway. I hope you will consider Linda Dunakoski’s closing in the State of Georgia vs Greg and Travis McMichael, the Ahmaud Arbery murder. She’s fantastic…she not only paints a vivid picture of the day’s events, but almost gives the jurors a lesson on how to be a juror. Other trials umm…oh Chandler Halderson of course. Brilliant opening and closing. Georgia Cappleman in FL vs Charlie Adelson for the murder of Dan Markel. Great video, thanks! ❤
Curious what you take will be on blood alcohol. The troopers didn’t get permission take a samples, and actually they never got or tested an actual sample. They only converted it if off of a test preformed at hospital form an involuntary hold. Which town police claimed from second hand info not at scene sounded suicidal. I honestly believe that was on purpose only to get the blood test. Because at time her car wasn’t at the scene, they had no evidence to suspect, to arrest or hold her for dui or any kinda accident.
Same. I have anxiety watching as a third-person perspective, I can't imagine how it feels for her. At this point, though, there is SO much reasonable doubt there's no way she'll be convicted.
Karen went home earlier that night bc she knew the daughter would be home alone. She cared about those children. She would never take their parental figure away from the kids especially after the loses they endured by losing their parents. No way no how.
The kids have suffered so much and Karen was close with them so it’s sad they told she deleted him on purpose. Prosecutor is also putting them on the stand. It’s gross
Maybe. Today, 5/24 those texts to the ATF guy suggested she was very conflicted regarding the children. Those texts were very damaging to her character. I still don’t buy what the prosecutor is selling, it is preposterous.
@@lilolmecj just like all parents , grand parents , ppl that deal with kids Some times they annoy u lol. Also if the bf was using her a a nanny with benefits
@@jborrego2406 trying to be fair to Karen, they were/are not her children. And her saying they were spoiled was not something she expected them to ever hear. Where I lost some compassion for her is her reaching out to start a flirt text relationship with one man while living with another. I was only speaking to the idea that she wanted to go home to make sure the niece was not home alone. It might not be fair, testimony from the children seems to reflect a decent relationship.
g*d damn. the way the defense addresses everything *PREEMPTIVELY*, Lally should be taking notes. It's like. the prosecution and the defense are in two different LEAGUES, WORLDS, UNIVERSES. Lally has no passion. Defense has all the smoke. Lally just rambles monotonously for days and I am just daydreaming. The minute the defense steps up, E.L.E.C.T.R.I.C.I.T.Y... this case has been brilliant to watch an amazing defense team. FREE KAREN READ.
I cried. I actually cried when I heard how she was treated by Trooper Proctor. I will never forget that. For me the case was over after hearing that. There are 10 women on the jury.
I'm 78. I always wanted to be an attorney but was unable to for circumstances beyond my control. I have studied law on my own for "fun." This series is so interesting to me. Just this, so far, has taught me more about the psychology of the opening arguments than all of the hundreds of hours I have spent watching trial videos. Fascinating.
We’ve had SO long of Lally’s meandering questioning now that I had forgotten how powerful this is. Can’t wait to get to the defense’s witnesses! Justice for John 💜
LOVE DAVID AND DUI GUY!! The difference in opening statements from the prosecution to the defense is mind blowing different !! Facts VS heavy breathing and “ummmm” (s).
I heard she has a lot of money. Which also means she had no real motive at all to harm muchless kill John. The state should have never even brought charges.. but here we are. I can't imagine the stress and what it must be like to be charged with a murder that u truly didn't commit. What a nightmare.
Everyone who say they think she is guilty either doesn’t know all this evidence, or they see a picture the news picked to make her look evil and they go “she just looks guilty” or “she doesn’t look sad.”
I am from MA, a couple towns over from Canton, and I appreciate Yianetti knocked this out of the park with his story telling, cadence, body language, everything. But he also actually has the all these facts on his side showing egregious misconduct and mishandling of evidence, a bunch of egregious evidence showing consciousness of guilt, a client who really was framed, a pretty relatively clean client, and the state has no evidence and a bad lawyer. He gets the pleasure of telling it to the world with all its fukery, and he nailed it like he’s supposed to, for the jury, for his client, himself, the public, he nailed it. I’m sure it was much harder than he made it look, to his credit, considering the amount of info he actually had to convey to make it make sense, and nothing more, in stark contrast to Lally’s terrible open, which left everyone scratching their heads, leaving my fave comment out of 5 different takeways I read immediately after put it, “All I really got was that someone ordered a pizza.” Karen’s got an all star defense and she needed a great defense, worth all the many pennies she’s paid them. He has the righteous indignation on his side. People are outraged, as they should be, in no small part because it’s been clearly and concisely conveyed in that chefs kiss 😘 👌🏻 opening, but he’s also not just a good murder defense salesman trying to sell a lemon for a case, so I don’t want to cheapen it down to lawyer trickery is all I’m saying. I’m just a layman though so what do I know. He likely did watch your video. I do love very much that these guys are smart enough to take the goods. I still think Trumps people lifted Americans are dreamers too from a tweet I @potus 2 weeks before his state of the union, not that I blame them
Lally’s opening statement was muffled and often inaudible. His words jumped all over the place in seemingly random and disjointed thoughts. Yannetti speaks clearly, weaving a detailed story of what the jurors should be paying attention to and bear in mind. His voice and intonation hold their attention and they understand their job in this trial.
I love this!!! People try to ignore the fact that most of us know who any of these people are. The case has become attractive because everyone in the work isn’t blind, we see, we hear and we know!!!!
Larry, No caution tape used? So Why would a Sargent use a leaf blower? To get previous foot steps removed from earlier in the night? I never knew they carried leaf blowers in the cars.
That was a very special leaf blower! It could find pieces of a glass masquerading as ice in the snow! But couldn't find any of the 47 pieces of highly reflective red plastic tail light. 'Must have missed a setting on the leaf blower.
I would love it if slowly but surely the O’keefe family started taking seats behind the defense, showing that they were following along & realized they had it wrong with these Albert’s & McCabes & the rest of the hooligans all along 🫣
LARRY, watch John O'keefe's mother (in green behind Yanetti) at 28:48. She mouths "NOPE" when Yanetti says the word!!! She crosses her arms also. It's not just the jury that is hearing him! John's mother got it!
I just sent this and the previous Yanetti video to my law school srudy group mates. So much to learn and so much inspiration to get us through our third and final year that begins in a couple of months. Btw, seeing you and the other RUclips Attorneys makes me feel like there's a light at the end of the tunnel and that once I'm through next year and the bar I can have fun with this again. For now though, head down, one more year to get through and a bar exam or two.
"Due diligence in this Agency is subject to judicial review. You WILL exhaust every angle, before they exhaust you." 😊 plaque in our office. FYI- "moral certainty" is in the text of the law and was specified distinctly by the judge to the jury.
Thank you for this series! I love watching trial coverage, but have been searching for someone to break down what’s happening in court. Your commentary alongside the coverage brings everything together in a way that the other channels I watch don’t do. Thank you for your hard work!
You sure? He seems to be intentionally sabotaging the case, like he really doesn’t believe in what he’s trying to argue. It seems more like he’s on the defense team at this point
Hi DUI Guy - I didn’t see this video so I’m going back. I still think John died because of something he found at work not because of jealousy etc. That’s such bs. Don’t forget the FBI was already investigating Sandra Birchmore and got into this trial also. Right at opening statements I felt sick to my stomach and these people’s eyes are “cold as ice”. Love this. Thank you.
Can I suggest the Matt Moore trial in Ohio? I believe the defense attorney, Diane Menashe, was able to masterfully demonstrate how bogus the state's case was.
Larry, Please take a moment to explain to all us “self proclaimed”, couch lawyers, if you can, why the judge would exclude the jurors and remove them from hearing much of the most relevant cross examination of Firefighter McLaughlin’s testimony?? Why would such impeachable testimony be revealed to a State’s witness, who just claimed she didn’t know the home she was responding to and only knew that she went to high school with a girl who shared the same name. Under cross examination, with the jury removed, the defense showed, not only did she know this family, she knew the girl well enough to pose for a picture on a vacation, beach party with Ms. McLaughlin, kneeling down next to her, her arm wrapped around her legs in a rather embarrassing photo! The jury was not permitted to hear this impeachable testimony or view the several photos of her partying with her, on several occasions!!! This to me is reprehensible!! Now some will say, he was permitted to ask her a few questions about these photos but not until the element of surprise, caught in a lie, was extinguished. Why Larry, would this judge do this??
Because she’s bias af she’s protecting the Albert’s and Mcabes they rent her summer house and they call her aunt Bev not only that someone in her family represented Chris Albert in his murder case it was a hit and run case and when the defence found out she was asked to recuse herself and she wouldn’t not only that but she was moved over to civil cases but she kept this case first and wanted to finish it,loads of evidence of bias in this case it’s shocking
Great coverage and insight. Thank you! I agree with you- it is an absolute pleasure watching Yanetti work. Obviously he has prepared well for this and it is apparent - well organized, emotional, speaks very well, is convincing me that he truly believes what he’s saying and fighting for.
Lucky has those bright lights on his snow plow that light up a very large area and did not see a body with 2 paces that morning. It was not Karen. The Master Class are awesome!
28:48 look at Peggy. that's WILD to me ..... absolutely WILD.... how'd she know what those txt msgs said... makes me think that they dont actually believe what weve all thought they do this whole time... or maybe their eyes eere opened thanks tot he fbi investigation into the investigation ... idk but i havent been able to stop thinking about this reaction she had
I find it hard to believe that it's actually going to trial. UNLESS...this will actually help to totally exonerate her so people won't be bothering her about it later...and that it will bring the honest truth to light. Thanks Larry, as always, you help us make sense of things we cannot grasp.
Ok I still have the same question, if Jenn McCabe left the Albert home AFTER ms reed, how did she NOT see the body on the LAWN?!!!! Nor did anyone else as they were coming and going???
I have known for a very long time, the justice system and cops are corrupt. I'm thankful for people who can point out how corrupt and unbelievably flawed the justice system actually is. I know you're a lawyer, I will forgive you later. This case exudes why you should never trust the Judiciary System love and respect to you you're actually really pretty by the way❤
I would like to suggest you cover Tony Buzzby ( I think that's his name) doing the closing on Ken Paxtons impeachment case. It was a doozy of a smackdown.
I've been saying this all along, I think a drunk Colin Albert beat up John. I think John fell backwards onto the gym equip in their basement hitting the back of his head. I think Chloe the German Sheppard went into attack mode at that time and that's how John git the bites or deep scratches on his arm. Where did Johns other shoe, belt and hat go?..did they have dog bites on them?..why aren't those items accounted for?.. There is definately a cover up. Many of the witnesses have purgered themselves..Jenn McCabe is the worst liar so far. She claims police reports of what she said in interviews are wrong denying what was said by the investigator..also Jenn denies searching "how long to die in cold" at 2:27 am..she claims the cellbrite report is wrong. She completely denies anything that incriminate her.. Plus this judge is very biased. I don't know how Karen can get a fair trial when this judge sustains about 95% of the prosecutions objections!..the def is being blocked (for lack of a better word) from presenting their case to prove Karen is innocent..can't this judge be held accountable for her bias?..
Thanks for doing this break down, it was so powerful! Free Karen Reed. And put all those others in jail for the police falsifying reports, all those who testified against Karen Reed for false allegations, lying on the oath!! Most of all All those who drove home from the water Fall, and from the Albert's home should be charged with a DWI.. Not Karen Reed!! Just my opinion 🤣
Was it a fight ABOUT ms reed between John and Higgins? She went out with him right? Could that be how it started and the rest joined in or simply covered it up?
I think we can see Mrs O'keefe (Johns mum) has made up her mind already she shakes her head no between 6/7 times, scoffs twice and shrugs/makes a dismissive motion about future plans her & John had. As much as I agree that John deserves justice I don't believe or have seen any evidence to say it was Karen that caused his death.
I don’t think anyone planned to kill him, either. Heck, Karen could’ve hit him or he passed out in the lawn and Chloe the dog escaped and attacked him. Maybe he tried to sneak through the backyard to surprise them and the dog savaged him. From nearly all angles, this looks unintentional to me. Things happened and they ditched him outside to save themselves. I only takes one person to know the full truth, and all the rest to just toe the line and refuse to ask questions to have “plausible” deniability (though none of them seem plausible imo).
What a great opening by this attorney, Mr. Yannetti. Much respect. She deserves this quality of defense as we can all see that this is a cover up.
Watching this again, well done by YOU DUI Dude by pointing out this master piece. Thanks!
@@danplaysbass6294😮😮😅😅😮😅
Incredible job by Yannetti and Jackson 👏🏻 well done!!
My heart is breaking for his parents, they both look like they're having a real hard time.
The father looks like he believes everything the Defense is saying
@@Alemaniaturquia Yes he does. They know the truth.
His Dad 100%. Idk about his Mom though. She was overheard at court, after one of the more recent pre-trial hearings, saying something along the lines of “I don’t care what evidence comes out. She did it and will always be guilty in my eyes”…
Hopefully someday she’ll be able to see through the 2.5 years of lies, manipulation, and brainwashing that she’s been the victim of at the hands of MSP, CPD, & NCDAO. So sad!
It’s heartbreaking. 💔 So much loss. Everyone talking about their son like he’s a prop. I mean no one means it that way but it’s got to be so difficult for his loved ones.
@Alemaniaturquia did you see his mom say nope when yanetti said nope for the second time at the end??
Man this Attorney IS ONE OF THE BEST IVE EVER SEEN and I was a Paralegal for 16yrs for a criminal defense Attorney! This is hows its done, no wonder she hasnt been worried, if my life was in his hands and i was innocent, i wouldnt worry either. Great job
The DA opening statement was monotone, not in chronological order and very confusing.
The defence opening was a riveting, chronological story that was easy to follow and contained important facts. I think the jurors will only remember his opening.
May I add this is the tiniest weirdest laid out court room I’ve ever seen to date. 😂
Lally is so out of his depth. We know more about these people’s kids’ sports experience than we do about how KR is supposedly tied to the crime.
You can tell Yanetti knows this case inside and out, and his disgust for both the law enforcement and DA’s handling of it is palpable.
Yannetti
Wow. I enjoyed watching a master at work
Did you see John's mom say nope when yanetti said it the second time??
I am shocked at the animal marks on that man.
Tears
Ooo, I’d love a series on openings statements and closing arguments. I rewatch my favorites often anyway.
I hope you will consider Linda Dunakoski’s closing in the State of Georgia vs Greg and Travis McMichael, the Ahmaud Arbery murder. She’s fantastic…she not only paints a vivid picture of the day’s events, but almost gives the jurors a lesson on how to be a juror.
Other trials umm…oh Chandler Halderson of course. Brilliant opening and closing. Georgia Cappleman in FL vs Charlie Adelson for the murder of Dan Markel.
Great video, thanks! ❤
Curious what you take will be on blood alcohol. The troopers didn’t get permission take a samples, and actually they never got or tested an actual sample. They only converted it if off of a test preformed at hospital form an involuntary hold. Which town police claimed from second hand info not at scene sounded suicidal. I honestly believe that was on purpose only to get the blood test. Because at time her car wasn’t at the scene, they had no evidence to suspect, to arrest or hold her for dui or any kinda accident.
Omgawd... john okeefe parents behind him.. they r shocked
You’re my favorite presenter on the internet!!!
I’m not shocked, I’m disgusted.
Shut up & let the guy talk.
David Yannetti ROCKS!
He is my hero!
As long as your on the same side😂
I 1000% feel she is innocent. This trial is making me so upset that I can't even imagine what Karen is going through ❤
man the the work that has to be done to get the truth out. thanks dui guy proud of your helping the non guilty.
Same. I have anxiety watching as a third-person perspective, I can't imagine how it feels for her. At this point, though, there is SO much reasonable doubt there's no way she'll be convicted.
They’re going to be playing this opening in law schools all over the country for years to come.
Karen went home earlier that night bc she knew the daughter would be home alone. She cared about those children. She would never take their parental figure away from the kids especially after the loses they endured by losing their parents. No way no how.
The kids have suffered so much and Karen was close with them so it’s sad they told she deleted him on purpose. Prosecutor is also putting them on the stand. It’s gross
Maybe. Today, 5/24 those texts to the ATF guy suggested she was very conflicted regarding the children. Those texts were very damaging to her character. I still don’t buy what the prosecutor is selling, it is preposterous.
@@AParallelReality I hope Jen isn't talking to the kids
@@lilolmecj just like all parents , grand parents , ppl that deal with kids
Some times they annoy u lol. Also if the bf was using her a a nanny with benefits
@@jborrego2406 trying to be fair to Karen, they were/are not her children. And her saying they were spoiled was not something she expected them to ever hear. Where I lost some compassion for her is her reaching out to start a flirt text relationship with one man while living with another. I was only speaking to the idea that she wanted to go home to make sure the niece was not home alone. It might not be fair, testimony from the children seems to reflect a decent relationship.
g*d damn. the way the defense addresses everything *PREEMPTIVELY*, Lally should be taking notes. It's like. the prosecution and the defense are in two different LEAGUES, WORLDS, UNIVERSES. Lally has no passion. Defense has all the smoke. Lally just rambles monotonously for days and I am just daydreaming. The minute the defense steps up, E.L.E.C.T.R.I.C.I.T.Y... this case has been brilliant to watch an amazing defense team. FREE KAREN READ.
the way the defense ripped apart these liars is a masterclass of making them eat shite
Tell me ur Irish without telling me ur Irish “ Shite
I cried. I actually cried when I heard how she was treated by Trooper Proctor. I will never forget that. For me the case was over after hearing that. There are 10 women on the jury.
I hope Yannetti & Jackson successfully expose all this BS. So horrible.
The true masterclass is in his investigation.
What an opening. She picked an amazing lawyer.
And Jackson. He builds with questions then pounces as the witnesses go for the cheese.
The really appalling part of this case is that the DA is prosecuting it.
I'm 78. I always wanted to be an attorney but was unable to for circumstances beyond my control. I have studied law on my own for "fun." This series is so interesting to me. Just this, so far, has taught me more about the psychology of the opening arguments than all of the hundreds of hours I have spent watching trial videos. Fascinating.
I Hope they don't get away with murder. FBI PLEASE!
Hands down, best opening statement in a trial I've ever heard! Like DUI Guy says, it's a masterclass in Lawyer-ing!! ⚖️
Chefs kiss, muah! 👌 Brilliant!
Absolute masterclass in opening statements, fantastic to witness, well done Yannetti!!! 🥰
We’ve had SO long of Lally’s meandering questioning now that I had forgotten how powerful this is. Can’t wait to get to the defense’s witnesses! Justice for John 💜
LOVE DAVID AND DUI GUY!!
The difference in opening statements from the prosecution to the defense is mind blowing different !! Facts VS heavy breathing and “ummmm” (s).
Did the people involved think she would not be able to afford a good defense.
Your answer is in the question
I heard she has a lot of money. Which also means she had no real motive at all to harm muchless kill John. The state should have never even brought charges.. but here we are. I can't imagine the stress and what it must be like to be charged with a murder that u truly didn't commit. What a nightmare.
I think they thought that she would assume she actually did hit him and take a plea. They definitely never thought she would fight it.
Everyone who say they think she is guilty either doesn’t know all this evidence, or they see a picture the news picked to make her look evil and they go “she just looks guilty” or “she doesn’t look sad.”
They should make a movie atta this case! Called "Copland 2" these cops gotta go down!
This case should have never even has gone this far I really don’t know how the prosecutor really thinks he’s going to win
Larry go back and look at when Yanetti said nope to BA catching any heat for this. JO’s mother Peggy lipped nope before Yanetti said it !!!!
I am from MA, a couple towns over from Canton, and I appreciate Yianetti knocked this out of the park with his story telling, cadence, body language, everything. But he also actually has the all these facts on his side showing egregious misconduct and mishandling of evidence, a bunch of egregious evidence showing consciousness of guilt, a client who really was framed, a pretty relatively clean client, and the state has no evidence and a bad lawyer. He gets the pleasure of telling it to the world with all its fukery, and he nailed it like he’s supposed to, for the jury, for his client, himself, the public, he nailed it. I’m sure it was much harder than he made it look, to his credit, considering the amount of info he actually had to convey to make it make sense, and nothing more, in stark contrast to Lally’s terrible open, which left everyone scratching their heads, leaving my fave comment out of 5 different takeways I read immediately after put it, “All I really got was that someone ordered a pizza.” Karen’s got an all star defense and she needed a great defense, worth all the many pennies she’s paid them. He has the righteous indignation on his side. People are outraged, as they should be, in no small part because it’s been clearly and concisely conveyed in that chefs kiss 😘 👌🏻 opening, but he’s also not just a good murder defense salesman trying to sell a lemon for a case, so I don’t want to cheapen it down to lawyer trickery is all I’m saying. I’m just a layman though so what do I know.
He likely did watch your video. I do love very much that these guys are smart enough to take the goods.
I still think Trumps people lifted Americans are dreamers too from a tweet I @potus 2 weeks before his state of the union, not that I blame them
I’m a two towns away and I agree with you!
My NEW FAVORITE SEGMENT!!!!!
It should shock them - this is the case of the century already, thanks for coverage
@doreeneclose that was a psyop
You are right! This maybe the trial of America's History. Right up there with Salem Witch Trials and the Lindberg Kidnapping.
I'm loving your new series, and what a marvelous teacher you are. Thank you for the videos, and keep them coming.
Lally’s opening statement was muffled and often inaudible. His words jumped all over the place in seemingly random and disjointed thoughts.
Yannetti speaks clearly, weaving a detailed story of what the jurors should be paying attention to and bear in mind. His voice and intonation hold their attention and they understand their job in this trial.
Wow, I really like watching this. The attorney is fabulous. I say that Karen will be proven not guilty!
I love this!!! People try to ignore the fact that most of us know who any of these people are. The case has become attractive because everyone in the work isn’t blind, we see, we hear and we know!!!!
Larry, No caution tape used? So Why would a Sargent use a leaf blower? To get previous foot steps removed from earlier in the night? I never knew they carried leaf blowers in the cars.
That was a very special leaf blower! It could find pieces of a glass masquerading as ice in the snow! But couldn't find any of the 47 pieces of highly reflective red plastic tail light. 'Must have missed a setting on the leaf blower.
A police officer on the scene lived on the same street, so of course he went to get his leaf blower to help
I would love it if slowly but surely the O’keefe family started taking seats behind the defense, showing that they were following along & realized they had it wrong with these Albert’s & McCabes & the rest of the hooligans all along 🫣
You are so right on this! That opening was brilliant!! Glad she’s got a top notch lawyer to help extricate her from this frame up!
They got rid of the dog? Evil is so pleased with itself, so cold, and, so banal.
Only now we can see how special this opening was but by the end we will called just brilliant.
LARRY, watch John O'keefe's mother (in green behind Yanetti) at 28:48. She mouths "NOPE" when Yanetti says the word!!! She crosses her arms also. It's not just the jury that is hearing him! John's mother got it!
I just sent this and the previous Yanetti video to my law school srudy group mates. So much to learn and so much inspiration to get us through our third and final year that begins in a couple of months.
Btw, seeing you and the other RUclips Attorneys makes me feel like there's a light at the end of the tunnel and that once I'm through next year and the bar I can have fun with this again. For now though, head down, one more year to get through and a bar exam or two.
You got this 💪 Good luck!
"Due diligence in this Agency is subject to judicial review. You WILL exhaust every angle, before they exhaust you." 😊 plaque in our office. FYI- "moral certainty" is in the text of the law and was specified distinctly by the judge to the jury.
Thank you for this series! I love watching trial coverage, but have been searching for someone to break down what’s happening in court. Your commentary alongside the coverage brings everything together in a way that the other channels I watch don’t do. Thank you for your hard work!
Good lawyering is better than any movie. Change my mind
Whats more astonishing is the prosecutor is obviously team Good Ole Boi Network.
You sure? He seems to be intentionally sabotaging the case, like he really doesn’t believe in what he’s trying to argue. It seems more like he’s on the defense team at this point
@@mahalalettvin7675 He does have the power to drop the charges.
Hi DUI Guy - I didn’t see this video so I’m going back. I still think John died because of something he found at work not because of jealousy etc. That’s such bs.
Don’t forget the FBI was already investigating Sandra Birchmore and got into this trial also. Right at opening statements I felt sick to my stomach and these people’s eyes are “cold as ice”.
Love this. Thank you.
I think that "to a moral certainty" is written into the state law, its specifically part of things in this state.
It was truly a Master Class in a defense opening statement.
The time of McCabes "hos long" and the fate of the missing sneaker are two huge issues, I'm looking forward to hearing addressed.
I love your dramatic breakdown of the opening. I can’t wait to see more.😊
"Cross examination is key that unlocks the Truth" ahh such gorgeous words
Can I suggest the Matt Moore trial in Ohio? I believe the defense attorney, Diane Menashe, was able to masterfully demonstrate how bogus the state's case was.
This is also fascinating she is definitely Being Framed
Wakeup Okeefe family you are all trusting the wrong People
I love it.. your commentary is amazing you can tell how passionate you are!❤️❤️❤️❤️
DUI deserves LIKES👍❤️🥳hit it💪
Best opening statement ive ever seen! Effective and absolutely beautiful 😍 ❤🎉 👏 🙌
The guy behind John's dad kept mouthing "lies"
Larry, Please take a moment to explain to all us “self proclaimed”, couch lawyers, if you can, why the judge would exclude the jurors and remove them from hearing much of the most relevant cross examination of Firefighter McLaughlin’s testimony?? Why would such impeachable testimony be revealed to a State’s witness, who just claimed she didn’t know the home she was responding to and only knew that she went to high school with a girl who shared the same name. Under cross examination, with the jury removed, the defense showed, not only did she know this family, she knew the girl well enough to pose for a picture on a vacation, beach party with Ms. McLaughlin, kneeling down next to her, her arm wrapped around her legs in a rather embarrassing photo!
The jury was not permitted to hear this impeachable testimony or view the several photos of her partying with her, on several occasions!!! This to me is reprehensible!! Now some will say, he was permitted to ask her a few questions about these photos but not until the element of surprise, caught in a lie, was extinguished.
Why Larry, would this judge do this??
Because she’s bias af she’s protecting the Albert’s and Mcabes they rent her summer house and they call her aunt Bev not only that someone in her family represented Chris Albert in his murder case it was a hit and run case and when the defence found out she was asked to recuse herself and she wouldn’t not only that but she was moved over to civil cases but she kept this case first and wanted to finish it,loads of evidence of bias in this case it’s shocking
I knew the Opening was going to be Amazing!!! 🤩 A-
Like and Subscribe 😉
Great coverage and insight. Thank you! I agree with you- it is an absolute pleasure watching Yanetti work. Obviously he has prepared well for this and it is apparent - well organized, emotional, speaks very well, is convincing me that he truly believes what he’s saying and fighting for.
I love your narration! ❤
I would say "NOT GUILTY" if I was a juror...I feel sorry for Karen because someone did it, and I am sure she wants to know.
Love ❤️ these videos.
Oh and when I did watch that I said that's exactly what he's showing us and he's not even up yet...
Lucky has those bright lights on his snow plow that light up a very large area and did not see a body with 2 paces that morning. It was not Karen. The Master Class are awesome!
28:48 look at Peggy. that's WILD to me ..... absolutely WILD.... how'd she know what those txt msgs said... makes me think that they dont actually believe what weve all thought they do this whole time... or maybe their eyes eere opened thanks tot he fbi investigation into the investigation ... idk but i havent been able to stop thinking about this reaction she had
I find it hard to believe that it's actually going to trial. UNLESS...this will actually help to totally exonerate her so people won't be bothering her about it later...and that it will bring the honest truth to light. Thanks Larry, as always, you help us make sense of things we cannot grasp.
DY is masterful!❤
Yanetti is a master!!
This entire case is an episode of the Twilight Zone
Or CSI : North Korea
Love your passion for the law LF! Thanks for covering this case with the outrage it deserves!
Love this idea about " masterclass" ! And even happier you started with the Karen Read case
Ok I still have the same question, if Jenn McCabe left the Albert home AFTER ms reed, how did she NOT see the body on the LAWN?!!!! Nor did anyone else as they were coming and going???
Oh wow I'm sooooo enjoying your intellect💗 I agree.. its what I call GRAND defense, she is very lucky to have them..
I have known for a very long time, the justice system and cops are corrupt. I'm thankful for people who can point out how corrupt and unbelievably flawed the justice system actually is. I know you're a lawyer, I will forgive you later. This case exudes why you should never trust the Judiciary System love and respect to you you're actually really pretty by the way❤
Opening and Closing by William Brown in the Chandler Halderson trial. Amazing job!
Now knowing that David Yannetti watched this video himself, I can't stop thinking about how good this probably made him feel. ❤
William Brown, Prosecutor for WI vs Chandler Halderson
I would like to suggest you cover Tony Buzzby ( I think that's his name) doing the closing on Ken Paxtons impeachment case.
It was a doozy of a smackdown.
Everyone who watches how she backed into johns car and hit it while leaving will KNOW for a FACT that she did not hit John. It’s a set up!!!!
I've been saying this all along, I think a drunk Colin Albert beat up John. I think John fell backwards onto the gym equip in their basement hitting the back of his head. I think Chloe the German Sheppard went into attack mode at that time and that's how John git the bites or deep scratches on his arm. Where did Johns other shoe, belt and hat go?..did they have dog bites on them?..why aren't those items accounted for?..
There is definately a cover up. Many of the witnesses have purgered themselves..Jenn McCabe is the worst liar so far. She claims police reports of what she said in interviews are wrong denying what was said by the investigator..also Jenn denies searching "how long to die in cold" at 2:27 am..she claims the cellbrite report is wrong. She completely denies anything that incriminate her..
Plus this judge is very biased. I don't know how Karen can get a fair trial when this judge sustains about 95% of the prosecutions objections!..the def is being blocked (for lack of a better word) from presenting their case to prove Karen is innocent..can't this judge be held accountable for her bias?..
Thanks for doing this break down, it was so powerful! Free Karen Reed. And put all those others in jail for the police falsifying reports, all those who testified against Karen Reed for false allegations, lying on the oath!! Most of all All those who drove home from the water Fall, and from the Albert's home should be charged with a DWI.. Not Karen Reed!! Just my opinion 🤣
Was it a fight ABOUT ms reed between John and Higgins? She went out with him right? Could that be how it started and the rest joined in or simply covered it up?
I am now seeing this, I can't take my eyes off JO mom in the background. Shaking her head, nodding her head, rolling her eyes.
Great channel, DUI guy. I mean, Yanetti is THE best.
I think we can see Mrs O'keefe (Johns mum) has made up her mind already she shakes her head no between 6/7 times, scoffs twice and shrugs/makes a dismissive motion about future plans her & John had. As much as I agree that John deserves justice I don't believe or have seen any evidence to say it was Karen that caused his death.
The George Zimmerman trial. Mark O’Mara closing argument.
I don’t think anyone planned to kill him, either. Heck, Karen could’ve hit him or he passed out in the lawn and Chloe the dog escaped and attacked him. Maybe he tried to sneak through the backyard to surprise them and the dog savaged him. From nearly all angles, this looks unintentional to me. Things happened and they ditched him outside to save themselves. I only takes one person to know the full truth, and all the rest to just toe the line and refuse to ask questions to have “plausible” deniability (though none of them seem plausible imo).
The case of Chandler Halderson and the prosecution is William Brown