Worth the Upgrade?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 июн 2024
- Steinberg Spectralayers got its yearly big update - is it worth the upgrade?
💜 Get 7% off for your first year on Distrokid by clicking here!: distrokid.com/vip/whitenoises...
💜Get great vocals with 10% off on your www.vocalfy.com purchase with code WHITENOISE10
- Find it the Make Belive Studio Mixhead plugin here:mhsecure.com/SoftwareSales/?s...
Plugin Deals - updated 10 July 2024
All of these links are affiliate and help to support this channel 😊
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Plugin with every Plugin Boutique paid purchase:
Audiothing Frostbite 2 or Newfangled Audio EQuivocate
www.pluginboutique.com/?a_aid...
Supertone Clear Post Production Sale (Exclusive) $69,-:
www.pluginboutique.com/produc...
Eventide H9 plugins from $25,- :
eventideinc.pxf.io/QyoyPY
Baby Audio Manufacturer Focus Sale:
www.pluginboutique.com/deals/...
Plugin Boutique DC Snares Intro Sale (Exclusive) $29:
www.pluginboutique.com/produc...
KIIVE plugins up to 66% off:
www.kiiveaudio.com/collection...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steinberg's Spectralayers gto upgraded to version 11 and improved on every part of its already extensive AI stems unmixing tools, restoration modules and much much more. 
Наука
Being an avid RX user for years I demo-ed SL10 a few weeks ago to see if (like you say) it’s an alternative for the Izotope app. I found the quality of some of the functionalities lacking in SL10 compared to RX10. RX somehow delivers a more precise result and offers more parameters to tweak. So I’d say it’s not an alternative but definitely adds to the restoration and mastering toolbox. 😊
I demoed Spectral Layers 10 a few Months ago in My Studio One 6 and I thought it worked great! I still do not like the high costs of some of this Restoration software plugins, but I like what they do. Great video White Noise
Thanks! For me it’s invaluable for how much I use it.
High costs? nope. Spectralayers is cheap compared with iZotope RX or other audio restauration competitors...
regarding the long processing times: If you have a decent graphics Card you can Switch SL to use the GPU instead of the CPU. This can bei MUCH faster!
Great tip!
Great video (as alawys 👍)! Now I know I NEED to upgrade.
I bought SpectraLayers Last October... I hope I get a Voucher from Steinberg
Unless you activated it after 15th of May, I wouldn't count on it.....
I bought it in March or April. Activated it back then. Now I've got a new computer, my last activation was May 20th, but I think I'll still need to pay for the update (it's not that much €67)
@@Henry0870 As you mention, May 15th is the date according the forum too, so I'm out and will have to buy it. But you may have a voucher for your second activation, let us know 🍀
@@MarcoPolux Nope, I had to buy the update……
definitely like the upgrade so far
Same, have been running it for a while now ( beta tester here) . Very proper upgrade for sure.
Will this work with Ableton and fcpx? That's what I use. Thanks. Great videos. Keep em coming
I feel like I am being dumb, but I can't help but wonder why Steinberg waits about a month post-release before releasing a demo/trial version of SL (as opposed to a trial being available alongside the full version's release).
There’s one available, but it’s version 10 don’t know why and I don’t understand that either.
@@whitenoisestudio It seems so stupid to me, delaying people's ability to try out and potentially buy SL.
Can we open this in fcpx? I have spectral Rx 10 but it doesn't open in fcpx. Thanks
I've got a Nvidia RTX A6000 with 48GB GPU memory (it's equivalent to a RTX 3090 but double the memory).
With GPU in use it takes 5:18 min to unmix a 2:27 min song at extreme settings and 2:15 min at high settings. But monitoring the process with ProcessExplorer it looks like SpectraLayers 11 does top out at using 3.5GB of GPU memory and GPU usage jumps up and down averaging at 20%. To me it looks like there is room for improvement and maybe they didn't expect a GPU with that much RAM or did restrict the memory usage and crippled performance by that.
I can confirm that GPU behaviour, i did a little test yesterday with a regular 3080. GPU spikes up and down with that card to 29% percent, while the CPU runs at 42-ish percent and that is with GPU rendering enabled in spectralayers. Almos looks like it reads / computes and then writes a bit everytime.
@@whitenoisestudio It also takes >20 sec of freezing after reaching 99% - until it is finally showing the unmixed layers.
Have also tried several VST3 plugins and some of them are off-setting the audio to the left after rendering - for example RX10 and Ozone10 plugins. Gullfoss plugin did stay in time. The whole interface of SL11 feels easier to use now.
yup. I assume thats a sort of final compsing. That offsetting sounds like a latency compensation bug.
Biggest plus point for the upgrade is the ability to drag and drop multiple/all stems at once into Cubase. (I'm still new to SL 10, so maybe I missed it in 10??)
its extremely convenient. Which DAW do you use?
@@whitenoisestudio Cubase. I just started using Spectralayers 10. Planning on "remixing"/remastering an album I did in the late 90's, before uploading it to Spotify and such. But it's 6 or 7 stems per songs, times 27 (songs...) I did 1 or 2 songs, but will start over and redo the unmixing with SL 11, as the quality also seems to be better in 11 vs 10.😎
@Henry0870 drag and drop should be available in 10 with cubase if I’m correct.
I wish you lots of luck and patience with 27 songs of unmixing ;-)
Drag and drop of multiple layers at once is indeed new to 11 :)
@rldivide Thanks Robin, of all people you should know ;-)
Is there a Demo?
yes sir: www.steinberg.net/spectralayers/trial/ but its still on version 10 apparently
Thank you!!