Ran unmix crowd, music, instruments including drum kit elements (Kick, Snare, Cymbals and Toms) on a 40 year old bootleg. Not perfect but very, very good. The next step will be to try the 'transfer' function where you find, say, a lead vocal that is in the 'Crowd' stem and graphically lasso it and transfer it to the Vocals track. No so quick, but should sharpen the stems up enough to basically remix a dirty, tape 'master' recording into something more balanced and listenable. A great leap for Spectralayers, and the next version should see them out of sight of the competition. Cool Vid Paul, thank you.
I've actually liked better the SL dereverb than Acon's. The voice sounded fuller and I think a second pass with Acon or Clear (also great for denoise/dereverb) it actually may get almost into studio quality territory. Great video, very entertaining.
We are now in our post pro studios completely on Spectralayers. Way better results and great workflow for audiorestauration too. RIP izotope RX. SL 11 highly recommend!
I agree, at least with denoising. A year ago, almost all my denoising went through RX, but now Clear, Acon, dxRevive and SL took the mantle. The only aspect RX still is king to me is spectral editing and vertical cleaning, and some niche tools like de-wind. Exciting times for voice processing!
I go all the way back to version 7 pro. I use it along with izotope RX 11 advanced and lots of plugins for forensics. For heavy duty buried voices- Hand carving using a spectral scope and manual brush is still the only answer, specially when the voice is only a distant part of the signal. Only issues so far is the GPU (4090) optimization is useless. Supposed to be fixed in a patch…
very good video regarding ( add this as plugins in Nuendo ) I think if they take a new path will be even better like enabling direct offline processing, and add these modules inside proceses will be something huge as most of these modules are not made to run in real time and they can also improve the experience of direct offline processing to make it easier to work with
Hi there, can you explain your request for destructive editing please? Surely the result would be the same, because that’s the best separation it can do, with the only difference being that whatever it’s decided becomes permanent. With non-destructive, it makes its decision but you have the option to move things manually from one layer to another because everything’s still there. Or am I missing something? Would the destructive method allow for a more powerful algorithm?
Not sure how you got unmixing of multiple voices to work but I've no success with it at all. It's the reason I upgraded to this version and it does not work on any songs I've tried (after separating out the vocals and chorus first of course). Nice video though.
Well, you took perfectly recorded voice recording and mixed it with noise and stuff…. Thats not how it goes, and those tests are cool, but not that realistic…. Still, spectralayers is A+
so nonsens....you take take 2 voices , let them see in a mix and then unmixed.......... what did happend in between , how did you unmix them , what was the proces?
i would definitely NOT recommend buying this. the unmix module can't even separate out the most basic stems. if you try to unmix a basic pop song, spectra won't be able to discern between a kick drum and a snare drum. it's just a giant unusable disaster - same as all unmix algorithms before it. nothing groundbreaking here unfortunately, and now i spent 300 bucks on this useless software because there was no trial... feels like that was probably by design. if you're looking for a way to separate stems from a song, this aint it.
It's a BULLSHIT toy for all those todays wanna-be "producer". Real producers don't need something like that. Or do you see Snoop, Dr. Dre, Quincy Jones, Rick Rubin or ANY real producer using that shit? Of course not.
Hey, have you heard anything about a thing called audio post production for multimedia? Have you ever thought, that working in a DAW is not only about producing music, but much more?
Helllooo! What do you think about new Spectraalayers 11? Do you have something else as your spectral suite? Lemme know down below, thanks!
What do you think about the declip and declick Tool in spectralayers compared to RX 11. Is it worth switching now for audio Post Produktion?
Super video! Exactly what I needed! Thanks
No probs!
Remember you can always go into the other layers and transfer the sound you’re missing or wanting to get rid of.
can you elaborate some more on that please
@@rolosaenz it may be easier to look up “spectralayers cut to layer above”
Ran unmix crowd, music, instruments including drum kit elements (Kick, Snare, Cymbals and Toms) on a 40 year old bootleg. Not perfect but very, very good. The next step will be to try the 'transfer' function where you find, say, a lead vocal that is in the 'Crowd' stem and graphically lasso it and transfer it to the Vocals track. No so quick, but should sharpen the stems up enough to basically remix a dirty, tape 'master' recording into something more balanced and listenable.
A great leap for Spectralayers, and the next version should see them out of sight of the competition.
Cool Vid Paul, thank you.
Thanks, Stevo!
I've actually liked better the SL dereverb than Acon's. The voice sounded fuller and I think a second pass with Acon or Clear (also great for denoise/dereverb) it actually may get almost into studio quality territory.
Great video, very entertaining.
I must agree with you. Acon still holds the stand as the best dereverb. Both Izotope and Stenibug should buy his algorithm
We are now in our post pro studios completely on Spectralayers. Way better results and great workflow for audiorestauration too.
RIP izotope RX.
SL 11 highly recommend!
Nice to hear that!
I agree, at least with denoising. A year ago, almost all my denoising went through RX, but now Clear, Acon, dxRevive and SL took the mantle. The only aspect RX still is king to me is spectral editing and vertical cleaning, and some niche tools like de-wind. Exciting times for voice processing!
Big fan of the idea of destructive/non destructive options.
I go all the way back to version 7 pro. I use it along with izotope RX 11 advanced and lots of plugins for forensics. For heavy duty buried voices- Hand carving using a spectral scope and manual brush is still the only answer, specially when the voice is only a distant part of the signal.
Only issues so far is the GPU (4090) optimization is useless. Supposed to be fixed in a patch…
very good video
regarding ( add this as plugins in Nuendo )
I think if they take a new path will be even better
like enabling direct offline processing, and add these modules inside proceses
will be something huge
as most of these modules are not made to run in real time
and they can also improve the experience of direct offline processing to make it easier to work with
Hi there, can you explain your request for destructive editing please? Surely the result would be the same, because that’s the best separation it can do, with the only difference being that whatever it’s decided becomes permanent. With non-destructive, it makes its decision but you have the option to move things manually from one layer to another because everything’s still there. Or am I missing something? Would the destructive method allow for a more powerful algorithm?
Thank you!
great show my friend
Dzięki za super video as always :) czy u Ciebie w trybie extreme tez to trwało wieczność ? :) (u mnie na i9 64Gb RAM iMac ładnych pare minut...)
Ryzen 7950X, dość szybko poszło!
Same you did not tried out the unmix choir from vocal tool...
Not sure how you got unmixing of multiple voices to work but I've no success with it at all. It's the reason I upgraded to this version and it does not work on any songs I've tried (after separating out the vocals and chorus first of course). Nice video though.
Helllooo .how can i get rit of phasing of drums after unmix . In spectralayers greeting to poland from Croatia.
Live recordings which were recorded under non optimal circumstances are more difficult to unmix
Great video! Do you think audio post Production has a bright future? Still? I doubt that:)
R.I.P. RX
Here in New Zealand, "packed up" means broken, or not working 😂
Apple Compatible?
Yep, there is a Mac installer, like for all Steinberg products?
@@FoliaSound All Steinberg releases are both Mac and PC
Well, you took perfectly recorded voice recording and mixed it with noise and stuff…. Thats not how it goes, and those tests are cool, but not that realistic….
Still, spectralayers is A+
Less words would have been fine...
so nonsens....you take take 2 voices , let them see in a mix and then unmixed.......... what did happend in between , how did you unmix them , what was the proces?
i would definitely NOT recommend buying this. the unmix module can't even separate out the most basic stems. if you try to unmix a basic pop song, spectra won't be able to discern between a kick drum and a snare drum. it's just a giant unusable disaster - same as all unmix algorithms before it. nothing groundbreaking here unfortunately, and now i spent 300 bucks on this useless software because there was no trial... feels like that was probably by design. if you're looking for a way to separate stems from a song, this aint it.
It's a BULLSHIT toy for all those todays wanna-be "producer". Real producers don't need something like that. Or do you see Snoop, Dr. Dre, Quincy Jones, Rick Rubin or ANY real producer using that shit? Of course not.
Hey, have you heard anything about a thing called audio post production for multimedia? Have you ever thought, that working in a DAW is not only about producing music, but much more?
Of course this is NOT mainly aimed at normal music producers but post audio production which is a different area.
Quiet down with your ignorance. Flew wayyyy over your head.
~70 Euros for the upgrade is too much.
Considering the number of new features and improvements in this upgrade, it's actually cheap !
RX 11 Advanced upgrade cost from any previous RX Advanced or Post Suite - 329 EUR :)
@@FoliaSound sonnox restore bundle for 100 bucks on sale
@@FoliaSound
Link?