After nearly 3 months on this ski, (22/23 season) here are my observations. 1. You can play and throw this ski all over a run, changing up from very tight turns to long. 2. It is a handful when running flat. Think packed catwalks without much room to move. The 13M radius and significant amount of rocker makes them really "swimmy" (even when pushed on with a legit 130 flex boot) They ALWAYS want to be turning. The only solution is to run them slightly on the inside edges or to keep them turning in the fall line. 3. IMO, not for those who can and want to ski a wide variety of terrain and snow types, and only want or can have one pair of sticks. They love groomers, are fun in bumps, and can even handle a little fresh, and a bit of the chunky-swirly. My current quiver is this ski, Nordica Enforcer 100, and a Fischer Ranger 108 which covers pretty much everything my home mountains in Aspen-Snowmass offer. If you're into "playing" on snow no matter where you are, get a pair of Mirus Cors; I can almost guarantee you'll have a hard time getting the grin off yer face.
How long are you skis, and how does this compare to what you would normally run? I’m trying to figure what would be my ideal length, as all of the lengths turn radius are identical.
As an owner of these I couldn’t agree more with everything you said, that being said I got first tracks on over a foot of freshies this morning and they were a blast, the fat tips and tails make it float surprisingly well for an 87 underfoot ski in my opinion
@@AndrewGustyn BC suggests skiing them shorter than your average length, but I couldn't disagree more. I have the 184, and if they made a 198, I'd buy it. The rocker tip and tail on these is considerable, making them feel a bit short when they aren't on high edge angles. The 13M radius is far more versatile than you would imagine, making them just as capable of big Super-G type arcs as well as lightning quick short-swing turns.
Black Crow Mirus Cor 173 is fun ski that you can carve anywhere including in the park. The Line Blade 176 is more stable at high speed but requires more effort to get up on edge with 95mm under foot vs Mirus Cor is 87.5 under foot. Shaggy Carver 88 is another ski with same design with 13.5 m turning radius 88mm under foot.
These things are siiiiiiick. And the black crows account has a video "return of air carving" 🤠😵💫 I might have to get these for my daily driver in Montana where we still haven't gotten snow mid October 2022!! Any day though, bring on the snow. Thanks for all the good reviews guys. IMO best internet ski reviews by a long shot.
They are looking darn interesting, might replace my Nordica Doberman SLC with these, i'd like to have smth lighter, but still fast and short turn radius. Just wondering how these would fit and compare with my KORE 87.
Great video! Question about northeast skiing… what do you think is the best width for it? I’ve heard people say anything under 90 works, or that anything over 90 is too much, or that it doesn’t matter haha. I’m looking into buying my first pair of skis are not really sure what width to look at
I think that width is only just one factor when selecting a ski for the northeast. i find that if you are looking for a true all mountain option 85-95 tends to be great. Look for the amount of camber to rocker ratio the ski has along with the materials within the ski. A ski that has more torsional stiffness tends to mitigate chatter and helps with grip on our firmer trails
Hi - and thanks for very helpful review. How would this work on afternoon conditions in the resort when all the pist´s are a complete mess, or on soft spring snow when there are alot of «natural» bumps in the piste? Does if float well enough for this?
It does kind of get bounced around because of the softer flex pattern and wide tips and tails. It can handle conditions like that, but it prefers to do it deliberately and at slower speeds rather than with reckless abandon and speed. Does that make sense? Basically comes down to how fast you ski and your skiing style more than anything else.
looks like a fun ski! I think I might pick one up as a firm snow ski. Did you guys take it off trail? how did you like it in moguls? seems like it would do well with how easily it slides
We took it off trail a little bit, yeah. It's an interesting mogul ski. I think it works really well as slower to moderate speeds in the moguls as it pivots and smears so easily, but it doesn't really have the stiffness to ski fast zipper-lines. Hope that makes sense...
Love the Stranger! It's way more of a real ski than the Mirus Cor, which i found to be a bit too strange. Even at 6'2 225, I'd ski the Stranger in the 180 any day. Solid, dense wood core and a twin tip shape at 100 mm underfoot is right up my alley.
Vertis is more of an on-trail performer with a directional format while Mirus Cor is something totally different. If you're looking for a unique ski experience--twin tip with a short radius and a swallow tail, then the Mirus Cor is for you, but for more of a traditional ski, the Vertis is a surprisingly capable carver and all-mountain performer, just nothing crazy about it is all. Have fun! SE
You guy's really are the best great chemistry I'm 60 year's old 6ft 175 lbs ski Mammoth Mountain California Park City Utah ski mostly groomers. I like to carve quick tight turns. What length do you recommend? + is the best ski for a skier like me? Thank you
I think 178 would be a nice sweet spot for you for length. This is actually a really, really good ski for someone who likes to make quick carves, and especially for someone who lives and skis out west. It doesn't love super firm, icy conditions, but that's not really a concern for you. I expect you'd love it, but you should be aware of how "different" it is. There's really nothing else out there like it, which makes it super fun and unique, but also somewhat polarizing.
great review ... many thanks! would you be so kind to help me with two questions since i'm seriously considering picking up a pair of these: - i am uncertain what binding to mount on these. right now i am looking either at the marker griffon 13 or the jester 16 as options but i am open for any other suggestion. my size is 185cm and i'm 80kg and what i would consider a decent skier. but i won't be doing anything crazy like big jumps on these. i am just looking for a playfull ski with a very short turn radius which allows me do short turns and go switch without too much effort. so i think the griffon 13 should to the trick for me. or do you have any other suggestions? - also being 185cm i'm not too sure what lenght i should get the ski. right now i'm leaning towards the 178cm version but i'm still not completely sure if the 184cm would be the better option. i guess the 184cm should give me a little bit better stability but i'm not sure if there would be a downside to that. i understand from the video that the radius is still the same and the black corws website suggests 184cm as more of an aggressive option. what would you say? many thanks for all your help and work
Hello! Sounds like Griffons would be plenty of binding and is going to keep the weight down. The only other binding I would bring up as a consideration would be the Look Pivot as it has more elastic travel and a shorter drill pattern, so allows the ski to flex more, which is something the Mirus Cor loves to do. I think 184 cm is probably the way to go. This ski feels relatively light, is relatively soft flexing, and uses a good amount of tip and tail rocker. In other words, it skis kind of short. I don't think there is much downside to going with the longer length as it still should feel very maneuverable and fun. Hope that helps!
At 6’1” and 240lbs, do I need to be on the 184, or can I get away with the 178, for a more “slalom” feel. The 178 may be too short because of the rocker? My Atris are 189, my Sick Day are 186. Thanks!
Hey Chris! I think 184 cm would be a safer choice at your size. The tips and tails are so soft that the 178 might feel a little squirrelly, and I doubt the 184 is going to lose the fun/maneuverable factor.
Hey great video, I have a pair of Kore 93s, looking for a piste orientated ski for icy days. Compared to the kore 93, is there enough difference to justify buying a pair?
I am 177 and weigh about 90 kilos. Should I get a 178 or 184. I have a mindbender 108 in 179 and a pair of Salomon blanks in 186. But looking for a more frontside and jibby ski. Also looking at yet another ski in the 90-100 mm for an all mountain alternative. But do you guys believe that the 184 will work or is the 178 enough and maybe more fun for someone that in this ski priorities quick edge to edge and a more fun approach with side hits and alike.
Hey Eric! Certainly somewhat of a tossup, huh? I'm a similar height and I thought the 178 was a great length for me. On the other hand, you've got about 20 kg on me and the Mirus Cor is a relatively soft-flexing ski. Still, I think I'm leaning more towards 178... I just think considering what you already own, you don't really need to focus on stability in these skis, and rather focus on making them super playful and jibby. That's my 2 cents at least... If I'm wrong and you are looking for some stability, then I'd probably go 184. Hope that helps!
How do you guys think these do in moguls? I saw a guy this past week skiing them on some big moguls on Outer Limits at Killington. You guys didn’t mention anything about bumps?
If you take it into bumps, you need to go slow and make rounder turns. Not the type of ski you'd want to bash down a zipper line as it doesn't have enough stiffness and support in the tips and tails. Good for someone who's going to stick to moderate speeds and turn around the bumps, rather than bash through them. Hope that helps!
I’ve skied the blades before. These would turn a little bit quicker, and a bit better suited for the east coast. If you’re looking for versatility, the blade is probably a better option.
@@colin3934 Thanks for your info! Do you feel the Blade feels sluggish at all with it's tips being so wide? I know it's a carving ski but it's just so hard to imagine it being quick side to side with 154mm wide tips, thoughts? I like the idea of the Blade, I want a crazier ski to add to the quiver, I'm leaning towards a Blade to shred carves on and on play on the sides of runs, pop off things, just play around and have fun. That's why this Mirus Cor is also intriguing.
It's hard to use the word traditional with either ski, to be honest. If I had to, I do think I'd say the Mirus Cor would be the ski, however. Most of it is coming from the 95 mm waist width in such a short radius and the unique application of metal in the Blade. I actually think the biggest difference between the two might be the speed at which you want to ski. The Blade can rip and has the stability necessary for higher speeds. The Mirus Cor gets a little twitchy at high speeds. I know that's not really answering your question, but certainly something to consider.
I have had 4 pairs of preachers now, and just come off a demo on these - they are way fast edge to edge as you expect with 87mm V 112mm underfoot. While the Cor will do side piste and some soft powder - but I think it is really a 'front side' ski - not a great ski if you want to ski hard and fast (to soft) - but great for fun and messing about on. I'd use this ski over the preacher if I was just on piste - the preacher is still way more of an all mountain ski. I would add definitely add this to my quiver - but it would not be my only ski.
Hey was just wondering what would be the best bindings on these skis? Would love to have touring bindings on them for sure but i dont want the bindings to affect the playfulness of the ski
I wouldn't argue against a hybrid touring binding, but a true tech binding will not allow you to fully unlock the playful nature of this ski. It's really an alpine ski that's meant to be used in the resort, so while you can do whatever you want with your skis, the best binding we can think of is an older Rossi FKS in Flouro Orange.
Yes, yes, and yes, but it has a very unique personality. You can charge on them as they're relatively stiff underfoot, but once you get to higher speeds, the tips and tails don't grip anymore so you're kinda sliding/slashing/smearing at high speeds rather than carving.
At anything above 30, the Mirus Cor can't really carve a clean turn anymore. The short radius combined with the more flexible tips and tails makes it a great carver at more moderate speeds, but above the threshold, it's more about smeary and slashy skidded turns rather than pure carves.
I think I might buy one of these for myself but I am really in doubt whether I should choose 173 or 179? I'm 178 cm and weighs 165 ibs, what do you guys recommend?
@@SkiEssentials Okay, thank you for your answer. I have been told by many people that the mirus cor shouldn't be the pair of skis to own as your only pair of skis. But if I decide to buy the skis it will actually be my first and only pair of skis. But my idea is to buy the mirus cor this winter and use it as my piste ski and partly as a parkski. And maybe use it a little bit outside of the pist this year, but then next year I would buy a 100% freeride ski. What do you think of that combanation?
Interesting ski... So this would not really compare to the Rossignol Experience TI 82/86 line, right? What other Black Crows ski's would? I'm 6" & 187 lbs. I'm looking for a playful all mountain ski that can really carve the groomers.
The Black Crows Divus and Vertis compare pretty favorably to the 82 and 86 respectively. Of those, the Divus is a very playful carver that's quick, poppy, grippy, and energetic. I'd take a square look at that one.
Yeah, prerecorded, except for us in the studio. We shoot a ton of content throughout the winter so we're able to keep things running through the summer and shoulder seasons. Believe it or not, we still have a ton of stuff that hasn't been released.
I am skier from South Korea. and I am an instructor who is planing to go Japan for ski trip. I am looking for one all mountain carving ski just like Line Blade. but seems like Black crows mirus cor also could be an option which one is better? *I stay most of the time in Korea and ski abroad once a year no powder in Korea only packed on piste and ice and slushy in spring
There's more fun and energy in the Mirus Cor than the Blade, which is pretty dramatic in its shovel dimensions. This makes it very unique, but not quite as carvy. It's easier to access the short radius of the Mirus Cor than it is the Blade.
Yes, I think so. I feel like it's the type of ski that you can ski a little shorter than usual, as its quickness and short-turn prowess is part of the design. I think 184 will feel great at your size.
After nearly 3 months on this ski, (22/23 season) here are my observations. 1. You can play and throw this ski all over a run, changing up from very tight turns to long. 2. It is a handful when running flat. Think packed catwalks without much room to move. The 13M radius and significant amount of rocker makes them really "swimmy" (even when pushed on with a legit 130 flex boot) They ALWAYS want to be turning. The only solution is to run them slightly on the inside edges or to keep them turning in the fall line. 3. IMO, not for those who can and want to ski a wide variety of terrain and snow types, and only want or can have one pair of sticks. They love groomers, are fun in bumps, and can even handle a little fresh, and a bit of the chunky-swirly. My current quiver is this ski, Nordica Enforcer 100, and a Fischer Ranger 108 which covers pretty much everything my home mountains in Aspen-Snowmass offer. If you're into "playing" on snow no matter where you are, get a pair of Mirus Cors; I can almost guarantee you'll have a hard time getting the grin off yer face.
We've been finding those same things to be true this year in our experience! Thanks for the great feedback!
How long are you skis, and how does this compare to what you would normally run? I’m trying to figure what would be my ideal length, as all of the lengths turn radius are identical.
As an owner of these I couldn’t agree more with everything you said, that being said I got first tracks on over a foot of freshies this morning and they were a blast, the fat tips and tails make it float surprisingly well for an 87 underfoot ski in my opinion
@@AndrewGustyn BC suggests skiing them shorter than your average length, but I couldn't disagree more. I have the 184, and if they made a 198, I'd buy it. The rocker tip and tail on these is considerable, making them feel a bit short when they aren't on high edge angles. The 13M radius is far more versatile than you would imagine, making them just as capable of big Super-G type arcs as well as lightning quick short-swing turns.
Black Crow Mirus Cor 173 is fun ski that you can carve anywhere including in the park. The Line Blade 176 is more stable at high speed but requires more effort to get up on edge with 95mm under foot vs Mirus Cor is 87.5 under foot. Shaggy Carver 88 is another ski with same design with 13.5 m turning radius 88mm under foot.
These things are siiiiiiick. And the black crows account has a video "return of air carving" 🤠😵💫 I might have to get these for my daily driver in Montana where we still haven't gotten snow mid October 2022!! Any day though, bring on the snow.
Thanks for all the good reviews guys. IMO best internet ski reviews by a long shot.
thanks! It's an interesting ski for sure. Narrow, yet wide. Turny, yet floaty. Very interesting combination of attributes.
They are looking darn interesting, might replace my Nordica Doberman SLC with these, i'd like to have smth lighter, but still fast and short turn radius. Just wondering how these would fit and compare with my KORE 87.
Great review as always!
7:30 actually Black Crows says the fish tail is just a design feature.
haha was gonna say
how does this compare to a ski like the armada stranger? I liked the line blade but im still looking for something with a twin tip too.
Thank you thank you
Great video! Question about northeast skiing… what do you think is the best width for it? I’ve heard people say anything under 90 works, or that anything over 90 is too much, or that it doesn’t matter haha. I’m looking into buying my first pair of skis are not really sure what width to look at
I think that width is only just one factor when selecting a ski for the northeast. i find that if you are looking for a true all mountain option 85-95 tends to be great. Look for the amount of camber to rocker ratio the ski has along with the materials within the ski. A ski that has more torsional stiffness tends to mitigate chatter and helps with grip on our firmer trails
Hi - and thanks for very helpful review. How would this work on afternoon conditions in the resort when all the pist´s are a complete mess, or on soft spring snow when there are alot of «natural» bumps in the piste? Does if float well enough for this?
It does kind of get bounced around because of the softer flex pattern and wide tips and tails. It can handle conditions like that, but it prefers to do it deliberately and at slower speeds rather than with reckless abandon and speed. Does that make sense? Basically comes down to how fast you ski and your skiing style more than anything else.
looks like a fun ski! I think I might pick one up as a firm snow ski. Did you guys take it off trail? how did you like it in moguls? seems like it would do well with how easily it slides
We took it off trail a little bit, yeah. It's an interesting mogul ski. I think it works really well as slower to moderate speeds in the moguls as it pivots and smears so easily, but it doesn't really have the stiffness to ski fast zipper-lines. Hope that makes sense...
@@SkiEssentials Agree, it was fun pivoting and smearing thought the moguls at Purgatory two weeks ago.
I really wanted to try a twin tip carving ski. Not sure how I like that tail, though. 🤣. Maybe. Just maybe.
Worth trying if you can find a pair to demo!
How does this compared to the Armada Stranger? I haven't seen many reviews or comparisons with Armada Stranger. Thanks again for a great review.
Love the Stranger! It's way more of a real ski than the Mirus Cor, which i found to be a bit too strange. Even at 6'2 225, I'd ski the Stranger in the 180 any day. Solid, dense wood core and a twin tip shape at 100 mm underfoot is right up my alley.
Like how this review gets more views from the official intro to the ski 😹😹😹
Hi, thanks for the review. How would these compare to the Black Crows vertis?
Vertis is more of an on-trail performer with a directional format while Mirus Cor is something totally different. If you're looking for a unique ski experience--twin tip with a short radius and a swallow tail, then the Mirus Cor is for you, but for more of a traditional ski, the Vertis is a surprisingly capable carver and all-mountain performer, just nothing crazy about it is all. Have fun!
SE
You guy's really are the best great chemistry
I'm 60 year's old 6ft 175 lbs ski Mammoth Mountain California Park City Utah ski mostly groomers. I like to carve quick tight turns. What length do you recommend? + is the best ski for a skier like me? Thank you
I think 178 would be a nice sweet spot for you for length. This is actually a really, really good ski for someone who likes to make quick carves, and especially for someone who lives and skis out west. It doesn't love super firm, icy conditions, but that's not really a concern for you. I expect you'd love it, but you should be aware of how "different" it is. There's really nothing else out there like it, which makes it super fun and unique, but also somewhat polarizing.
great review ... many thanks! would you be so kind to help me with two questions since i'm seriously considering picking up a pair of these:
- i am uncertain what binding to mount on these. right now i am looking either at the marker griffon 13 or the jester 16 as options but i am open for any other suggestion. my size is 185cm and i'm 80kg and what i would consider a decent skier. but i won't be doing anything crazy like big jumps on these. i am just looking for a playfull ski with a very short turn radius which allows me do short turns and go switch without too much effort. so i think the griffon 13 should to the trick for me. or do you have any other suggestions?
- also being 185cm i'm not too sure what lenght i should get the ski. right now i'm leaning towards the 178cm version but i'm still not completely sure if the 184cm would be the better option. i guess the 184cm should give me a little bit better stability but i'm not sure if there would be a downside to that. i understand from the video that the radius is still the same and the black corws website suggests 184cm as more of an aggressive option. what would you say?
many thanks for all your help and work
Hello!
Sounds like Griffons would be plenty of binding and is going to keep the weight down. The only other binding I would bring up as a consideration would be the Look Pivot as it has more elastic travel and a shorter drill pattern, so allows the ski to flex more, which is something the Mirus Cor loves to do.
I think 184 cm is probably the way to go. This ski feels relatively light, is relatively soft flexing, and uses a good amount of tip and tail rocker. In other words, it skis kind of short. I don't think there is much downside to going with the longer length as it still should feel very maneuverable and fun.
Hope that helps!
At 6’1” and 240lbs, do I need to be on the 184, or can I get away with the 178, for a more “slalom” feel. The 178 may be too short because of the rocker? My Atris are 189, my Sick Day are 186. Thanks!
Hey Chris! I think 184 cm would be a safer choice at your size. The tips and tails are so soft that the 178 might feel a little squirrelly, and I doubt the 184 is going to lose the fun/maneuverable factor.
Hey great video, I have a pair of Kore 93s, looking for a piste orientated ski for icy days. Compared to the kore 93, is there enough difference to justify buying a pair?
I think they're different enough skis for sure. It's a very playful carver rather than a rugged and aggressive one, though.
I am 177 and weigh about 90 kilos. Should I get a 178 or 184. I have a mindbender 108 in 179 and a pair of Salomon blanks in 186. But looking for a more frontside and jibby ski. Also looking at yet another ski in the 90-100 mm for an all mountain alternative. But do you guys believe that the 184 will work or is the 178 enough and maybe more fun for someone that in this ski priorities quick edge to edge and a more fun approach with side hits and alike.
Hey Eric! Certainly somewhat of a tossup, huh? I'm a similar height and I thought the 178 was a great length for me. On the other hand, you've got about 20 kg on me and the Mirus Cor is a relatively soft-flexing ski. Still, I think I'm leaning more towards 178... I just think considering what you already own, you don't really need to focus on stability in these skis, and rather focus on making them super playful and jibby. That's my 2 cents at least... If I'm wrong and you are looking for some stability, then I'd probably go 184. Hope that helps!
How do you guys think these do in moguls? I saw a guy this past week skiing them on some big moguls on Outer Limits at Killington. You guys didn’t mention anything about bumps?
If you take it into bumps, you need to go slow and make rounder turns. Not the type of ski you'd want to bash down a zipper line as it doesn't have enough stiffness and support in the tips and tails. Good for someone who's going to stick to moderate speeds and turn around the bumps, rather than bash through them. Hope that helps!
❤👍
Do these ski more like a traditional ski than the Blades? Since the Blades width is so big? I’m trying to decide between these and the Blade.
I’ve skied the blades before. These would turn a little bit quicker, and a bit better suited for the east coast. If you’re looking for versatility, the blade is probably a better option.
@@colin3934 Thanks for your info! Do you feel the Blade feels sluggish at all with it's tips being so wide? I know it's a carving ski but it's just so hard to imagine it being quick side to side with 154mm wide tips, thoughts? I like the idea of the Blade, I want a crazier ski to add to the quiver, I'm leaning towards a Blade to shred carves on and on play on the sides of runs, pop off things, just play around and have fun. That's why this Mirus Cor is also intriguing.
It's hard to use the word traditional with either ski, to be honest. If I had to, I do think I'd say the Mirus Cor would be the ski, however. Most of it is coming from the 95 mm waist width in such a short radius and the unique application of metal in the Blade. I actually think the biggest difference between the two might be the speed at which you want to ski. The Blade can rip and has the stability necessary for higher speeds. The Mirus Cor gets a little twitchy at high speeds. I know that's not really answering your question, but certainly something to consider.
I’ve been tele skiing the Blade for the past 3 winters. I ski it loaded & railed all day❤️❤️🤙🤙
Sounds like we finally have a ski, who can compete with WHITE DOT's Preacher ski in fun factor...
I have had 4 pairs of preachers now, and just come off a demo on these - they are way fast edge to edge as you expect with 87mm V 112mm underfoot. While the Cor will do side piste and some soft powder - but I think it is really a 'front side' ski - not a great ski if you want to ski hard and fast (to soft) - but great for fun and messing about on. I'd use this ski over the preacher if I was just on piste - the preacher is still way more of an all mountain ski. I would add definitely add this to my quiver - but it would not be my only ski.
that style tail should be called lizard toung
Love it.
have you tryed the 184 yet?
not yet
Can it do bumps??? With R13 and soft tip I would think yes. But no reviews have covered this yet.
Great bump ski! It's on our list for another review this year, so we'll be sure to get it in some moguls for sure.
@@SkiEssentials it would be nice to talk about sizing too. Thanks
Hey was just wondering what would be the best bindings on these skis? Would love to have touring bindings on them for sure but i dont want the bindings to affect the playfulness of the ski
I wouldn't argue against a hybrid touring binding, but a true tech binding will not allow you to fully unlock the playful nature of this ski. It's really an alpine ski that's meant to be used in the resort, so while you can do whatever you want with your skis, the best binding we can think of is an older Rossi FKS in Flouro Orange.
What do you think about the salomon shift?
I ski in colorado, Is this good on moguls, bumps, and trees? Can you charge on these skis?
Yes, yes, and yes, but it has a very unique personality. You can charge on them as they're relatively stiff underfoot, but once you get to higher speeds, the tips and tails don't grip anymore so you're kinda sliding/slashing/smearing at high speeds rather than carving.
Hi guys, could you be more specific when you are saying doesnt like to go super fast and start to feel unstable, what is the approx. Speed?
Tnx
At anything above 30, the Mirus Cor can't really carve a clean turn anymore. The short radius combined with the more flexible tips and tails makes it a great carver at more moderate speeds, but above the threshold, it's more about smeary and slashy skidded turns rather than pure carves.
I think I might buy one of these for myself but I am really in doubt whether I should choose 173 or 179? I'm 178 cm and weighs 165 ibs, what do you guys recommend?
I think you'll maximize the fun on the shorter length. That's what these skis are really all about.
@@SkiEssentials Okay, thank you for your answer. I have been told by many people that the mirus cor shouldn't be the pair of skis to own as your only pair of skis. But if I decide to buy the skis it will actually be my first and only pair of skis.
But my idea is to buy the mirus cor this winter and use it as my piste ski and partly as a parkski. And maybe use it a little bit outside of the pist this year, but then next year I would buy a 100% freeride ski. What do you think of that combanation?
Interesting ski... So this would not really compare to the Rossignol Experience TI 82/86 line, right? What other Black Crows ski's would?
I'm 6" & 187 lbs. I'm looking for a playful all mountain ski that can really carve the groomers.
The Black Crows Divus and Vertis compare pretty favorably to the 82 and 86 respectively. Of those, the Divus is a very playful carver that's quick, poppy, grippy, and energetic. I'd take a square look at that one.
@@SkiEssentials Thanks a lot. Could I ski it in 177 with my 6” and 187lbs and maintain stability on higher speeds? Or should I go with 182cm?
Is this prerecorded or ???? I am just shocked if there is a place in US where ppl can still ski
This would’ve been shot this last season.
Yeah, prerecorded, except for us in the studio. We shoot a ton of content throughout the winter so we're able to keep things running through the summer and shoulder seasons. Believe it or not, we still have a ton of stuff that hasn't been released.
I am skier from South Korea. and I am an instructor who is planing to go Japan for ski trip. I am looking for one all mountain carving ski just like Line Blade. but seems like Black crows mirus cor also could be an option which one is better? *I stay most of the time in Korea and ski abroad once a year no powder in Korea only packed on piste and ice and slushy in spring
There's more fun and energy in the Mirus Cor than the Blade, which is pretty dramatic in its shovel dimensions. This makes it very unique, but not quite as carvy. It's easier to access the short radius of the Mirus Cor than it is the Blade.
I'm 190cm and 76kg (6.2in, 168lb) is the 184 cm model long enough?
Yes, I think so. I feel like it's the type of ski that you can ski a little shorter than usual, as its quickness and short-turn prowess is part of the design. I think 184 will feel great at your size.
How does this compare to the Camox?
Much shorter turn radius and the tips and tails are softer too. The Mirus Cor is a very unique ski, it's almost hard to compare it to anything else.
What is super fast?! I get up to about 45 mph.. No idea what the speed limit on these are
I'd say 45 is too fast for the Mirus Cor's comfort. They're happier in turns, so straighter-line skiing is not this ski's forte.