2022 Men's 90 mm All Mountain Ski Comparison with SkiEssentials.com
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 июл 2024
- Here's our first 2022 Ski Comparison! We know it's long, here are the time stamps. We'll do our best to keep the remaining comparisons closer to 1 hour.
00:00 - Introduction
1:40 - Armada Declivity 92 Ti
4:25 - Armada Declivity 88 C
7:20 - Atomic Maverick 88 Ti
11:25 - Black Crows Orb
15:25 - Blizzard Brahma 88
19:40 - Blizzard Rustler 9
24:50 - DPS Pagoda Piste 90 RP
30:25 - Dynastar M-Pro 90
36:20 - Elan Ripstick 88
41:20 - Fischer Ranger 92 Ti
47:00 - Head Kore 87
53:17 - K2 Mindbender 90Ti
58:45 - K2 Mindbender 90C
1:01:55 - Kastle MX88
1:07:35 - Nordica Enforcer 88
1:12:10 - Rossignol Experience 86 Ti
1:17:25 - Salomon Stance 90
1:21:10 - Salomon QST 92
1:25:50 - Volkl Kendo 88
1:30:45 - Liberty Evolv 90
1:32:40 - Stockli Stormrider 88
Written Comparison: www.skiessentials.com/Chairli...
LETS GO 2022 SKI COMPARISON SEASON
It's not like I'm buying new skis every season, but I always tune in for the annual Jeff and Bob comparison videos.
Thanks Steven!
You guys have the best channel ever for ski equipment... Thanks for all your hard work!
At first I thought maybe you were going to be a long-lost snowblade RUclips channel... drone racing makes way more sense!
Also, thanks so much for the kind words!
This is true!
This is a great time to start releasing these videos. Temps in the morning and evening are starting to fall which means skiing is around the corner! Love the format of your videos. Gives us all info on what ski would work for our style.
Thanks Nicholas!
I live for these ski comparisons! So good.
Great video as usual! For future videos, I love when you guys organize them on a “playful to powerful” spectrum on the wall. You’ve done it in a few videos and it’s good to see what skis are comparable.
Thanks Matt! We'll definitely do at least a few comparisons in that format. I enjoyed that as well. We just planned next week's comparison and we're going to try going lightest to heaviest... we thought that would be an interesting way to organize things.
Man I love these videos. I'm all for the longer length! 1.5 hours, 2 hours, 3 hours, keep it going!
Thanks Joe!
Thanks guys. Good stuff. I've been looking forward to this from you and can't wait for the next ones Winter is coming....
Love your videos. I watch them every week. Keep up the great work!
Thanks again for all the hard work leading to these videos guys! I'm so glad you're doing this for us every year!! You're the best!
Thanks so much!
I just went back and re-watched the 2021 80mm all-mountain video and I liked the way you lined them up by price point in that video. That actually made the most sense in watching it all the way through. Just my two cents. Keep it up! Bought a pair of Fischer skis off of you last year due to these videos.
Thanks for the feedback, Nick! We'll certainly organize some of the 2022 comparisons that same way.
90 minutes. Oh boy is this great !!
Love the videos!! Don't shorten them up; we want to geek out with you! Again just tons of informative content. Thank you.
More to come!
I have been looking forward to these comparison videos all year. Another spectacular job. Thank you. I only have one complaint .... I now am overwhelmed with a need to buy every ski on the wall .......! This problem is going to become even worse when you get you get to the 100mm comparison.
Haha, we completely understand. Bob and I spend so much time talking about all these different skis, it's hard to not want to own them all...
So glad you're back! Top of the line ski reviews and comparisons from you guys yet again! Nobody does it better!!
Thanks Greg!
Dope. Thanks guys!
I bought the Elan Ripstick 88's at your suggestion in 2020. They are amazing and so much fun to ski! When I put them on for the first time I understood your description to the word. I think your descriptions are spot on. This season I passed up on the Elan Wingman 82 cti that you suggested to me would be a great addition to my Ripstick 88s for hard snow carving and instead purchased the Head ERallys, which you told me were stiffer, heavier and a little more work to ski. You were correct there as well. When I ski the ERallys I have to work much harder to keep them under control, but they carve on the hard snow like crazy. The weight of the Head skis is at times a detriment to a 61 year old skier with some age related knee issues. I skied my Ripsticks for an hour one day then switched out to the Head skis. I caught an edge on my first run and went down. I immediately thought about you comments and have learned this lesson a couple other times as well. I have to adjust my concentration and technique when I ski the Head skis. This purchase was a great lesson in terminology and taking advice. Great Job Ski Essentials, keep up the great work.
Hey Jeff! Hope you're okay after your fall! Appreciate the feedback here. I'm glad you're loving your Ripstick 88s and hope the Rally doesn't beat you up too much. Super fun ski, but definitely requires more skier input and concentration. I actually skied it last week and was reminded of its precision and overall performance, but the Wingman is certainly easier to ski!
Yea! Love these comparisons! Thanks!
Thanks for watching!
I have some Mindbender 90Ti's on the way currently. 5'7" and 165, went with the 170's for Vermont all mountain use. Thanks for the excellent videos as usual.
I will also say I work for another specialty retail ecom site (I wish it was skiing related) and can't imagine the amount of prep that goes into these videos. This hour and a half is only the tip of the iceberg in terms of effort. Great job getting into the weeds where other brands wouldn't consider it worth the time.
Thanks! It is a ton of prep work, then a good amount of editing, etc. I always appreciate when people acknowledge that, so thank you.
great work you guys are passionate professionals and everyone involved with the sport benefits- thank you
Thanks Steve!
given these videos are over an hour long I am just putting likes on them all for the effort. Thanks for the videos
Thanks! That means a lot.
Thanks for your videos, good work!!
Thanks Lars!
Great!!! Love your vid
I am 5’5” 145lbs The Blizzard Brahma 88 True Blend wood core was my New England everyday driver last season. The feel and flex was perfect and it adapted to different turn shapes and snow conditions. I also ski the Rustler 9 (2020 model) as my everyday driver out at Alta. You are absolutely right on the mark with your assessment. The single Titinal laminate, and rocker profile make this ski super versatile. I replaced a Bonafide with this Rustler 9 and now have the Rustler 10 on my wish list. Blizzard has some really great design concepts to accommodate different sized skiers.
Rustler 10 would be a lot of fun to have out there in Alta! Good east coast powder day ski too. You see a lot of them here at Stowe.
SE, I think this is your best comparison you've done. You weighed the skis which was a huge win. You hand flexed the skis = awesome. In the time that you're talking about them, I think every pair should have had a base to base press for a quick view of the camber and rocker. You did this for some.
The best part (to me) was you both talking about the Brahma. I've said it on other forums: when a ski maker builds a ski like the Brahma it is made for people who are technically proficient, skilled skiers and sized appropriately. The shortest Brahma is not made for a poor skier and the longest for the best skier on the mountain. Choose your length based on your weight. If you need more stability, it's your skiing, not the ski.
Thanks for the feedback! Much appreciated. We'll try to remember to do a camber/rocker profile for each ski. The weighing was fun and we thought it added a lot, glad you agree!
Great video
Awesome review!
Thanks!
Watched last year's 90 mm ski review and bought Salomon Stance based on info and good price I got them at. Skied first time on them last week in Baqueira Beret in Spain. They had 3 metres of snow and previous two weeks and had chance to ski all sorts of conditions including deep powder, crust, packed piste depending on slope orientation. Was delighted with them and their versatility having come from skiing 100 mm skis that were more pow focused. Great edge hold on piste but felt good off piste also.
Thanks for sharing your experience, Peter! Delightful versatility is a perfect way to describe the Stance 90. Among all the skis in that width range with two sheets of metal, we generally find it to be the most or among the most versatile.
I just bought the rustler 9 off your website I’m very excited
Nice! Have fun!
I'm 160lbs, on telemark gear on the Wasatch Back. Got the Rustler 9 last year in the 164 as a carving/bump ski (part of my quiver) and was blown away at how much fun this ski is! At this length it has a nice tight 14m turn radius, but it feels very accessible. It's easy to get that tight turn out of it; enough that I have to watch my posture so I don't "over-G" my back. Releases from turns with a discernable "POP". Energetic, quick edge to edge, the tail rocker makes them easy in the bumps and allows for skiing switch. A very nice ski.
Super fun skis, right? Thanks for chiming in with your experience!
Bravo guys
Thank you for taking the time to make a video like this! I’m looking for a good frontside ski that is stable at speed but is also okay with softer snow and moguls. I have a separate pair of skis that I use for powder, so powder performance isn’t crucial to me. I would say I’m an advanced-expert skier (6’1” 190 lbs). The skis that I’m stuck between are the declivity 92ti, maverick 88, Brahma 88, and mindbender 90ti. I don’t know if 188-189cm length would be too long for me or not (I currently ski on 184s that are 102 mm underfoot). I spend virtually all my time at speed which makes me gravitate towards the Brahma, but I don’t have a racing background and corduroy isn’t the only condition I’d be using these skis in. If you have time I’d really appreciate your input and any other suggestions on models I may be overlooking, thanks!
The Brahma is an awesome ski. It absolutely rips. That said, it's also the most demanding in moguls out of everything you've listed. Mindbenders and Declivity have similar feel, not quite as powerful, but easier, more maneuverable, and more forgiving in bumps. Maverick is the lightest out of that group and I'd say the quickest in moguls, but you lose some top end stability and vibration damping. I'd ass the Enforcer 88 from Nordica to your list. It rips carving turns, but has some versatility to it as well. In a similar conversation to the Declivity and Mindbender. Hope that helps!
Love the videos. No one else doing anything like this online.
Question: Im 45M / 6Ft 230, beginner/Intermediate Skier. I'm skiing mostly Colorado. So far Ive just done resort groomers but am interested in exploring off groomer skiing at some point. Would any of these be better than any others for me? Should I go wider or narrower maybe?
Thank you so much for one again putting together such a large amount of work in your videos, you’ve really got a great channel. For someone who is very much an “advanced beginner / beginner intermediate” (can’t explain my position any better than that….) I am around 185lb and 6ft. Would you give your recommendation on maybe the best 2 or 3 options on the board and possible length. I am skiing in Japan but still mainly on groomers….I may try this year to venture into some softer stuff if I can build up the confidence! Thanks so much!
Hey Mike! Rustler 9, Ripstick 88, Mindbender 90C, QST 92. Those are all great options for your current ability level and where you ski. For length, I would try to stick to the mid-170 cm range. Going over 180 cm would be overkill, but going shorter than 170 would likely result in them feeling somewhat unstable. Hope that helps!
@@SkiEssentials thank you very much that is extremely helpful! Really appreciate the reply!
Yay, THAT time of the year again! The ski equivalent of Pirelli Calendar. And I mean the golden standards from the old times, not the modern atrocities.
Please hurry up with the 90-100 and 70-80 mm. Ah yes and 60-70 would no go amiss either although I believe this is not a category very interesting for the US skiers.
I have looked at your videos about what is in your quivers, and it seems as though Nordica has quite a few models in them for all 3 of you, i am 5'10 170 hi intermediate/expert and live out west, like to ski soft snow, 1-10" either off trail. or on a groomer that has fresh snow, trees and bumps and would like a ski in the 95-102 width, i have watched alot of your reviews and am wondering what you guys would recommend ? It seems as though the soloman Qst 99, or dynastar M free 99, blizzard rustler9, in your opinion is there a better one than those?
Got to demo the Ranger 92ti today at June Mountain. Performed excellent in the trees, agile, good float in the powder stashes. Well on groomers although wish it ripped a little more there. Decent in the crud. Overall great ski. Will demo a few other models before buying anything but it’s definitely a contender.
Great to hear! Great skis!
Looking to upgrade from Volkl Kanjo 84s (175 length) to one of the skis on this wall, or a wider version of. Solid intermediate skier on my third year back after a long hiatus. I'm 6'3" and 250 "athletic" lbs, so share a body composition more similar to Bob. I'm finding I need a ski longer and wider for the stability. I have my eyes on the Nordica Enforcer 94s for a bit more versatility, and do most of skiing on piste at Stowe. Im not a hard charger, and will probably always ski a little more conservatively. Wondering what you guys recommend.
My body is ready
Love your content! You people have the most comprehensive ski reviews I've found. I'm 5-10 155 lbs. East coast with the occasional trip out west. I'm an advanced skier who is only interested in natural terrain, I love trees, bumps, powder. The only time I ski a groomer is to get to a natural trail. Currently have QST 92 169s. Lately I feel like I'm overpowering them. I'm considering Elan Ripstick 96 172, or Volkl Blaze 94 172. Maneuverability in tight trees is very important to me, but I'd like to be able to handle some more aggressive charging in crud and powder that my qsts are lacking for me. I've never had super long skis so I'm hesitant to size up a lot. Anything else I should consider? Thanks for you help.
Hello! Ripstick 96 would be a great ski to move to. You'll get more vibration damping and more edge grip in that ski. Blaze 94 isn't going to provide a huge difference compared to your QST 92 in terms of stability, edge grip, and vibration damping. Pretty similar there to be honest. In the Ripstick, you could even consider going to the 180 cm length too. I'm about your size exactly and that's the length I prefer. More stable, but doesn't lose its playful, fun-loving attitude.
Hi guys! You make such great content, comparing so many different options. Im looking into getting a new pair of all mountain, since i dont do as much freeriding anymore. Have been on the Armada TST 183cm since 2013. Really loving the versatility and playfulness! But im looking for more on piste performance, while still being able to slash some fun turns, and go backwards once in a while. Can you recommend any from this line up? Keep up the good Work!
Hi Ida! The Rustler 9 would be a great ski for that. It still retains some playfulness, so you're not completely giving that up coming off the TST. On the other hand, you're definitely gaining significant on-piste performance. More edge grip, more stability at speed, more vibration damping. As a bonus, it's probably the best ski in this comparison for skiing backwards, so checks that box as well. Hope that helps!
You guys should get some Moment skis to review!
Awesome video! I get excited for these each year.
I was wondering if you guys had any recommendations for an intermediate/advanced skier. I'm around 6' and 175lb and I like to ski pretty fast and aggressively, but I'd also like the freedom to be able to ski in any conditions.
Again, great video and awesome channel!
Hey Ian! Lots of great options for you. Focus on skis with relatively strong construction (probably some metal), but a versatile shape. Declivity 92, Maverick 88, Rustler 9, and Mindbender 90Ti all feel like great options. Start there and let us know if you have any other questions!
@@SkiEssentials awesome thank you guys so much
Great review as always guys, I'm currently looking at getting a frontside focused ski to add to my quiver here in CO. I am a pretty aggressive advanced skier and am looking for a stable carver that I could also take into the harder bumps on low snow days. I think I am leaning towards the Dynastar M-Pro 90, but I also like the Kendo and the Mindbender 90ti. It seems like the kendo would be not as forgiving and the mindbender would not be as good of a carver. Am I on the right track or is there another ski I should be looking at?
Hey Alex! Yup, you're on the right track here. M-Pro 90 actually feels like the best choice for me. That ski absolutely loves harder bumps. The tip shape isn't hooky, while the tail is stable and supportive. Great carving skis too, they just don't pull you into a turn like some, but that's where the versatility for bumps comes from.
Between the Mindbender and Kendo, yup, Mindbender is a little more playful and forgiving, while the Kendo is more precise.
credit to the cameraman/woman...how he (she) stays that steady is amazing.
Hey thanks! Probably a mix of both Jeff and Bob filming the footage in this video.
It will be a camera stand...
How does the Armada 88c and the Ripstick compare to each other. Which is better at slower speeds? Which has better grip on hard ice groomers. ? Which one has more or better all mountain versatility for moguls and trees?
Hi guys, this video is a masterpiece, congrats! I’m looking for a new skis and the ones I like the most are the dynastar and the Salomon stance, I ski really hard and fast and I like going off the piste but also staying on the slope, which one would you recommend me? Cheers
Thanks so much! Both are great for what you're looking for. The M-Pro has a stiffer tail and really finishes a turn with some power. The Stance is still a powerful ski, but feels a little more surfy in the tail. Easier to release and get it to pivot. M-Pro works well off piste too, but it requires more unweighting of the tail (more of a traditional skiing style) rather than being smeary. Hope that helps!
Hi, Im addicted to your ski comparison videos! Even during the summer months!..i need help. How would you guys compare the MBender 99 to the Enforcer 88? They sort out appear a similar ski ignoring the 10mm?? Thanks
Definitely a similar ski overall, but realistically The Mindbender 99 is closer to the Enforcer 100 and the Enforcer 88 is closer to the Mindbender 90. Between them, the Enforcers feel stronger to me overall, while the Mindbenders feel a little more maneuverable off piste. That's especially noticeable in the the narrower skis. I find the Mindbender is an easier mogul and tree ski. The 99 gets pretty heavy, so I find less difference in that application between the MB 99 and Enforcer 100. Hope that helps! Might not be super clear, but that's because overall, they're quite similar.
Great summary review, thanks!! I heard about a new Swedish brand Extrem. Did you guys already tried those skies?? I’m very curious how they perform.
I haven't tried them! Would love to sometime.
favorite all mountain mogul skis Jeff and Bob? I'm 5'10" ~145 lbs expert skier, I have 2021 kore 87s 171 and love them. I think they fit my style, I value the playfulness and light weight. Moguls are my favorite terrain. I love your content!
I've been on the 2023 Atomic Bent 90 and think that it's just about the best mogul ski I've been on. They're light like the Kore, but not nearly as stiff, so you can really drive the tips into the troughs. Line Sick Day 88 and Elan Ripstick are also high on my list, but I've been loving that new Bent 90!
Armada Edollo for the win!
And thanks for the Time Stamps! Great review of the Head Kore but the 94 - thinking also about Rossignol Sender 94. Looking for the 1-ski quiver, mostly carving/groomers. Thoughts?
The Kore is still lighter and stiffer, so is more responsive than the compliant Sender. The Paulownia in the Rossignol is still on the stiff and light side, but it doesn't quite compete with the Kore's use of carbon and karuba to access the full power of the materials. If you're looking to make easier carved turns, I'd look to the Sender, but heavier and more aggressive skiers will likely gravitate to the Kore. I'm one of those heavier skiers, so I do prefer the Kore for groomers.
SE
Thank you so much for your work.
Great video!
I’m looking for a second ski for those bad conditions/ lots off snow, or slush, without being to off piste oriented/aggressive.
Was thinking about Kendos or Mavericks but I’m still so overwhelmed by all your info 😂
What would you recommend ?
Thx in advance
I would say the Maverick is probably a better choice for variable snow conditions like that. The shape of the Kendo makes it a more responsive and better carver, but the Maverick is definitely a more versatile shape and ski. Feels like a better choice to me based off everything you've said. Hope that helps!
Awesome, thank you for the video, pretty informative. Hovewer I still can not decide between Armada declivity 92 and Maverick 88, I would like to know which one is more energetic and poppy.
You'll get more energy and pop out of the Maverick. The Declivity has more vibration damping and feels smoother, but not as poppy.
Awesome review! I bought my first pair of skis last season, the QST 92, and I've been enjoying them! I've been thinking about adding a pair of carving skis to my quiver but not sure if it's necessary. What are your thoughts? I live in the west and I ski mostly on groomers but am venturing into some trees, jumps, and moguls this season.
HI Stanley!
I'd give a strong look at the Volkl Deacon 80. It's a capable carver for sure while remaining light and maneuverable enough for trees and bumps, just so long as there's not a lot of snow. It's not necessary, but a whole lot of fun!
SE
Thanks for all the great reviews, super insightful. I'm skiing a 2013 K2 Charger 186 and 2016 Volkl Mantra 190, now looking to replace both with ideally one new Ski that somewhat combines what I like about them. 6.4" and 220lbs, advanced Skier, realistically 80-90% piste, often at higher speeds. Naturally 90mm seems to be somewhat in the middle, open for other suggestions of course. Looking at 88 Brahma or Enforcer, maybe Mindbender (90ti?)... Can any of these get close to Charger level edge grip and carving? Thanks!!
Hello! I would say Kendo 88, Brahma 88, and Enforcer 88 are your best bets. At your size and coming off the Charger, you're going to want a pretty strong ski. All 3 of those should satisfy your demands and expectations on firm snow. Between the thee, the Enforcer is probably the easiest when you take it off trail, then the Kendo, then the Brahma, and consider it the reverse order in regards to edge grip and power on firm snow.
Awesome comparison again guys! Looking for some advice out of this category. I bought a pair of Fischer Ranger 102fr's last year as my daily drivers (in Idaho) which I absolutely love and bought in part due to your reviews. Thinking I'd like to add something in the 90ish category for groomer days that can offer a little more grip than the fr's, especially in icy conditions. I'm an advanced skier and would like something that's not too punishing on the quick off trail run in the trees. I had a pair of Dynastar Legend 88's that I moved on from because I thought they were too punishing in the tails in soft snow for me. I like that the Ranger 102 is stiff but still pretty poppy and energetic, so would like to have a similar feel in a front side ski. My short list is the Armada Declivity 92ti, Elan Ripstick (maybe even in the 96 Black, but that seems a little too close to the Ranger 102 in width), Ranger 92ti, Kendo, K2 Mindbender and maybe some in the Black Crows line. Anything else I should consider?
Hey John! I think you're on the right track here for sure, and I agree it makes sense to look for a narrower ski, but one with a similar overall feel of the Ranger 102 FR. Your feedback on the Legend 88 is super valuable in choosing these next skis. Declivity 92 should definitely be on the list. Pretty much checks all your boxes without being too punishing. Ripsticks are awesome, but I agree that the 96 is getting maybe a little too close to your 102. The 88 could work, although it doesn't have quite as much grip as the Declivity. More playful and more energetic, but not as strong. Ranger 92 is similar to the Declivity in a lot of ways, but the tail feels stiffer to me, so I'm not sure that's the way to go. Kendo could work for sure, similar to the Declivity in some ways, but its build gives it a more responsive feel. Maybe not quite as smooth as the Declivity, but stiffer and more reactive. The ski that comes to mind from Black Crows would be the Serpo. It's has everything you're looking for. I don't think you need to add any other skis to the list of contenders. You've got some great options here. I'm leaning towards the Declivity or Serpo just because i feel like they retain some of the Ranger 102 FR overall feel, but with stronger, more frontside-oriented performance.
@@SkiEssentials Appreciate the feedback! Also, I really like that you guys included both skis in the comparison this time so you can see the rocker, camber, etc. Keep up the good work!
The M-Pro 90 is a party up front, and pure business in back
Exactly!
Hi guys. I really enjoy your videos - super helpful info. I'm looking to upgrade my skis and am having a hard time deciding between front-side and all-mountain for my next pair. As an East coaster, I ski on-piste the vast majority of the time and don't get many opportunities to improve my off-piste game. But I really want my next skis to be suitable for softer and off-piste conditions, so that when the conditions are right I can take advantage and learn. Will a hybrid front-side/all-mountain ski be the best choice for me (M-Pro 90 kind of thing), or should I just go with a full on all-mountain ski (Brahma/Declivity/Maverick) right off the bat? I'm a fairly light skier (5'10"/160lbs) and am in the early-advanced range of skiing ability. Thanks again and keep up the good work.
Hello! In general, I think this is the category you want to be in. Right around 90 underfoot. That'll give you good on-piste performance, but also allow for some soft snow skiing, off-piste adventures, etc. Brahma is a lot of ski and can be challenging off-piste. The Declivity 92 or Maverick 88, however, feel like great choices to me. Both of those skis carve well, but can handle bumps, trees, and soft snow without issue. Other skis in that range too as we talked about in this video, but those two would be excellent options for you.
Let's goooo 🔥🔥💯
Oh how I wish there was a touring version of this video :)
also, damn Jeff can rip
Loved the video guys! I’m an experienced skier and am looking for a pair that carves well but still hold up well off piste and is fairly agile. I like the look of the elan ripstick but was concerned when you said it was mainly better for lighter skiers (I’m about 80kg). Any recommendations?
HI Zak!
It's really only at the very high end of the performance spectrum that you can feel the flex of the shovel. I don't think I'd put you in the "heavy" category--more referring to skiers like me at over 220 pounds who can drive a ski. If you are looking for a stronger, yet still agile ~88 ski, I'd lean to the Volkl Kendo or Armada Declivity 92 Ti--not too heavy, but still has the metal for strength and dampness. Have fun!
Hey there, amazing video!!!! I'm a 6ft - 170lb - 26 y/o male. I mainly like to carve quite aggresively and fast, sometimes I visit the park and occasionally do some offpiste. I'm looking for a one quiver ski and am deciding between the: Nordica Soul rider 87, the enforcer 88 and the fischer 94fr. Carving abilities are the most important for me. What would you recommend? (I know the enforcer would probably be the best carver, but i do like to ski switch sometimes..) Is the carving on the enforcer significantly better than the other two?
Thanks, Dirk!
Yes, the carving power of the Enforcer is better than that of the other skis. it's a bit more demanding, but the high end of the performance is all there. Your priority seems to line up better with the Enforcer 88 than the others. Have fun!
SE
Based on my 58 years of skiing and teaching on all types of skis and lengths, here's the deal, the reality, of skis today.
1. No matter what ski or length you buy, you have to adapt your body to it. Your upper body positioning has to be adjustable to make the skis work in all types of conditions and grades. Example: There are all types of cars from Smart Cars to Formula One. They all go forward and back and make turns but your input is going to vary to make them work in every conmdition and situation. Even cars in the same class, race cars for instance, each one will require specific inputs from you to make it work at it's peak performance.
2. Back to skis. Each ski in each class, in each available length, will need adjustments in your input to make them work on the exact same line down a given slope.
3. Basically, the slower you want to go, the shorter the ski. The faster you want to go, the longer the ski. Go karts have very short wheel bases. Land speed cars have very long wheelbases. You need the right length for the speed you plan on going.
4. When I ski, all I do is evaluate the skiers around me. 9 out ot 10 skiers ski incorrectly. Their input is all wrong and defeats the design intention of the skis. They actually ski as if they have wood 1x4's with screwed on edges and force the skis to turn instead of allowing them to perform as designed. It is NOT your fault!!! It is the way you were taught and unfortunatily, the way you are Still taught today. So, what you have on your boots doesn't really matter much.
So here is the way for you to buy skis.
a. Pick you favorite brand.
b. Pick your favorite color to match your boots and cloths. I'm not kidding!
c. Go to the best ski shop in your ski area and tell them how you ski. A video on your cell phone will be of great help. Like I said, it really doesn't matter much.
d. Rent a few different skis from them and choose the ones you like the best.
Understanding what skiing is and what the skis need from you is the answer, not which skis you have on. No matter what ski "I" put on, I would have to adapt to what it needs.
Yes yes yes yes yessssssss
Hey guys, first of all, I've discovered your reviews just recently and I have to give you major props. What an amazing job looking at various skis, their comparisons, technologies, videos to go with it, just fantastic!! Anyhow, curious what's Jeff's weight/height if it's not too much info to ask lol, would help to get an idea. Regarding this review in particular, I'm not entirely sure if there is an upgrade to Kendo 88 compared to the last season's model? It's been my "do it all east coast ski" currently yet lately I find it a bit too demanding particularly in moguls as I ski more and more of them. Just a tad softer tips and a slightly lighter body while maintaining its monster carving capability would be amazing. I'm 5'9" 165Lbs skiing 177cm. Would love to get your feedback. Thanks again.
Hey Roman! I (Jeff) am 5'10 and around 160 lbs, sometimes a little lighter. There is an upgrade to the Kendo, perhaps you saw our review of it go up a week ago. My preferred length in the Kendo is 177 cm, for sure, and I imagine you would find the same thing.
Basically everything you're describing is what they put into the new ski. I wouldn't say the tips and tails are drastically softer flexing, but definitely lighter. It's most noticeable in swing weight, the new ski is quite a bit easier to flick around.
Hope that helps!
Hey guys, great page and amazing reviews!
I’m looking to buy my first All-Mountain Ski to complement my race carver. I’m an advanced skier with about 25 years of experience but mostly on piste. Especially looking for a really versatile ski that keeps up while on piste carving and also allows me to hit off piste whenever we have fresh snow (70/30). I tried the Nordica Navigator 85 (not the newest model) from a friend and really liked it but want something more wide and it seems it was still very on-piste focused. From watching all your videos I think the Mindbender 90 TI would be a good ski for me. Would you agree and what would be other skies to consider as a really versatile All Mountain? I’m 5”10 166 lbs - what size would you recommend - 177?
Thanks a lot!
Big fans of that ski--great carver, playful for what it is, and super-versatile. Elan Ripstick 88, and Dynastar M-Pro 90 should also be on that list. At your size, I'd say the mid 170's is a good length for sure.
Great reviews. Thank you! Could you recommend a width for a 172cm Ripstick 88 or 96? 5’5”, 150lbs advanced telemark skier with NTN setup. Skiing Midwest and a couple trips to CO annually. Thanks!
Hi! Hmm. I think 88 is probably best. That'll be more appropriate in the midwest and it's still a lot of fun in soft snow too if you happen to get a bunch of snow when you're in Colorado.
Hey guys. Amazing reviews as always just getting all the details for all of us out here. I need some HELP! I'm looking for skis in the 88 - 96 range. I am 6'0, 165 lbs, slim skinny body, I love resort skiing but I'm now getting to the point where I want to try backcountry and I think my ability level permits it. Which ski do you think can work for both conditions? Something lightweight. I feel that the Elan Ripstick with the sidewalls, or the Salomon QST 92, help anyone. I once tried the Rossignol Experience 88 and found that I didn't like them. What can you recommend for me? Thanks again for everything.
Hi Michael! Both the Ripstick or QST 92 would be a good choice. With the Ripstick, I would probably go to the 96 waist rather than the 88. That will give you a lot more performance in softer snow conditions without sacrificing too much on-trail performance. The Ripstick 96 is $150 more than the QST 92, but I also think it's fair to say it's a more versatile ski and probably the better choice for what you're looking to do. So, if that's reasonable to you, go for it. If you'd rather save some money, the QST 92 is still going to perform really well for you.
This is the best analysis out there for all of the popular skis.
How will you compare maveric 88 ti and stance 90 for groomers and icy conditions for strong intermediate?
Maverick is considerably lighter, so it feels a bit jittery while the Stance 90 feels more composed at speed. That said, the Maverick is quite a bit quicker than the Stance, and it makes a lot of sense for skiers that have more of a mogul influence, while the Stance is a bit more lumbering, and not in a bad way.
Hey, amazing channel, here from Spain, I will love a little bit of help, I’m 6’6 with 215 pounds, a intermediate skier, which all mountain ski should I get ? I was thinking in the maverick 95, 188 cm
Is a good option? Thanks!!
Fantastic choice. Light, forgiving, but also strong and supportive for your size. You're on the right track, I'd go for it if I were you!
Hi! I was wondering about buying the 88 ENforcers, I'm 6ft, and I am coming from AtomicVanguard 83 175cm, looking for a bit more of speed.
Which length 179cm or 186cm? With a 90 mm binding will be ok or I should go for the 100mm? Thank you!
You should be just fine on the 179, that will feel a lot stronger than your current Atomics, IMO. 90 mm brake will fit perfect on this ski, 100 would be a little too much overhang.
Thanks for a really good comparison! Interesting if you add where the skis are produced too. Add a lot to the overall impression about quality. A ski Made in China I would never buy.
So glad I found this channel. I ski predominantly east coast…Mont tremblant specifically. I’m 5’ll 265. Advanced to expert skill level… would that Nordica work for me? I’ve been skiing on Salomon s/max the past few years and love them, but am looking for something a little more versatile for the 3-5” over night coatings. I’m mostly a packed powder/groomed skier and don’t mess with moguls or trees since a couple knee surgeries. I’m open to any other suggestions if you don’t mind.
Yup! I think the Enforcer 88 is a great choice. It has more of a freeride inspiration to it while retaining excellent edge grip. Makes those 3-5 days a log of fun, but also allows for fantastic groomer performance. Volkl Kendo and Salomon Stance 90 are right there with it.
www.skiessentials.com/2023-nordica-enforcer-88-skis-w-tyrolia-attack-11-gw-bindings.html
Hey guys! Thanks for an amazing review. I'm a 6'2, 210lb intermediate skier. I'm skiing blues at Tremblant pretty comfortably and want to progress to blacks this season. I'm looking for a ski that would be good for the east coast, that allows me to progress and grow as a skier. I tend to be a more cautious skier, and not a hard charger. What ski would you recommend? Thanks so much!
I've become a big fan of the Ripstick 88 for skiers in your position. Relatively easy to ski, its shape promotes good technique and proper carving, and it's not too fatiguing, while still being trustworthy. Some bigger skiers find the tip a little soft, but I don't expect that would be a major issue for you. K2 Mindbender 90C would be another good one. I've also grown quite fond of the Armada Declivity 88 C. All 3 of those skis would work quite well for how you spend you time on the slopes and they certainly could all help you take your skiing to the next level. For length, I would try to stick right around 180. That will be supportive for your size, while still remaining maneuverable and user-friendly. Hope that helps!
Thanks so much for the advice! This is the best place on RUclips for advice on ski equipment! Follow up question to your answer: how would the QST 92 or head core 87 compare? Would you still recommend the Ripstick 88?
Hi, I have been looking for a new pair of an all-mountain ski. I currently have Rosii experience 77 and mostly used to ski on east coast. now that I feel I am becoming more intermediate skier we are taking more trips out west. I Will probably stay mostly on groomed runs but would like to have flexibility. I am 6'0 190lbs, 48 yo.I am considering rossi expirience 96ti, elan ripstick 96, and nordica enforcer 94. hat is your recommendation?
Hi Vladimir! At your current ability level and from everything you've said about your skiing, I think Ripstick 96 makes the most sense. That ski is the easiest to ski out of everything you're looking at and will also help you transition into softer snow and un-groomed terrain more easily. It's a great ski for that application. Extremely well-rounded skis with a very broad appeal. An expert will love them, while an intermediate like yourself will too.
Tossing up between the Fischer Ranger 92 ti & the Armada Declivity 92 ti, mostly for southern hemisphere freeride touring (very variable conditions, steeps, trees etc). Both seem like they'd fit the bill & like the partial twintip tails. Any thoughts on comparative preferences? Strengths / weaknesses for said conditions? Would really appreciate your thoughts. Thanks. Stuart, Tasmania, Australia 👍
Hi Stuart! In general, I find the Declivity 92 Ti a little more playful, while the Ranger 92 Ti is a little stronger and more powerful. Realistically, they're more similar than different. Both 92 underfoot, both have similar rocker/camber shapes, both are essentially designed for the same thing. The way I think about it, and I think it's a good way to decide between the two, is do you want a ski that feels a little more forgiving and more versatile (Declivity) or a ski that takes the stability to the next level at the cost of some maneuverability (Ranger). Hope that helps!
You guys are the best. I think I am going to go for Enforcer as opposed to Brahma (5'9", 190 lb, advanced) for more versatility and enjoying tighter spaces. Could you help me figure out how to choose between Enforcer 88 vs 94? I mostly ski on the east coast but I do west coast trips. So if 94 would not ruin my groomed icy quebec ski days, Id with the 94 to enjoy it in the Rockies. However, if you would say 94 is too wide for groomed ice and mogul and I should go with 88 to always enjoy groomed runs but the 88 would also work well on soft snow then Ill do that... Please help
Hello! I think considering your position and where you're going to ski, I think 94 is the way to go. 94 is absolutely not too wide for groomers, even here on the east. We have tested it thoroughly on firm eastern conditions and it holds up just fine. Considering you're going to use it out west too, I think the 94 makes more sense. You're gaining some valuable soft snow performance in the 94, and realistically the only thing you're losing is some edge to edge quickness on firm snow, but you're not losing much. The 94 is still very responsive. I'm going to leave my reply on your other comments too for others to see.
Question: just got my new Kendo 88s mounted and the bindings seem too far back. What is the recommended mounting position. I see 3 lines on the ski. Am I to assume that's the center? Should any of those line up with the centre mark on the boots? Appreciate any help you can provide. Thanks guys!
In general, mount points have moved forwards on the majority of current ski designs. The Kendo is a pretty traditional, and directional ski. The Mantra, 108, Kendo are all very rearward biased mounts. You can take your pick of any of those suggested mount lines, however I would guess that most people buying the Kendo (in particular) would opt for the most rearward line.
And yes, all those lines would correspond to where boot center mark is. To see how boot center aligns, stick a boot in the binding and use a square to eyeball it because just eyeballing alone it is never accurate. More forward mount should/will engage in turns quicker when rolling it onto edge and give up some stability. I think anyone can get used to any mount point within reason, but for ski like the Kendo, the rearward line makes sense.
FlimFlam pretty much hit the nail on the head with his response. 3 recommended lines on the Kendo and I think it's fair to call the furthest back the "traditional" line with the others being +1 and +2 respectively. Also, as he mentioned, the Kendo has a traditional shape, so it's going to look like it has a longer tip than some skis. Hope that helps clarify!
Great job guys! Wonder what you mean by "early taper"(??)
We've probably done a better job explaining that in other videos and our apologies if we gloss over details like that. Early taper refers to where the widest point of the ski is. The tip of the M-Pro 90 is a good example. The widest point is set back a ways from the actual end of the ski, which is what we refer to as early taper. The Experience 86 Ti is a perfect example of a ski that has no early taper at all.
Great reviews! Need your advice please 🙂I've been skiing Volkl Unlimited AC4's for 17 years (184cm) and need to change them (no edge left) at the end of this season, but love these skis. They are 82mm underfoot, but I do struggle in powder so thinking of widening so min 88mm. I'm an aggressive skier and love moguls, long carving turns, short radius, and just booking down the hill full speed (with the occasional turn). My preference is off-piste (not necessarily just fresh powder). Was thinking of Brahma 88, Kendo 88, or M6 Mantras. Will try to test them, but that may not happen. Your thoughts are highly valued on what skis would be best. Can also be other models I am not thinking of - Would greatly appreciate it!
HI Claudio!
Kendo is a nice blend of the three--precise and quick while remaining versatile enough for bumps and some powder. If you're looking for a similar feel with a wider body, then yes, the M6 is a stronger choice. For most skiers looking to do what you want, the Kendo will do it all. Have fun!
SE
So at 195lbs and ski in Colorado on the Enforcer 88 for two years i want a change. Liked the ski a lot but want a little more light weight and more playful ski....Any suggestions?...Thanks in advance and love your videos....
Hey Dan! What about the new Atomic Maverick 88 Ti? Lighter, a little more playful, but still supportive for a skier your size. That's the first ski that comes to mind!
Awesome video.
I just bought a QST 98 (176cm) and I'm thinking of adding something to round out a two-ski quiver -- Elon Ripstick caught my eye. I'm 5'9" and super light at 135-140lbs. My ski style blends all mountain, with steep technical terrain, the occasional drop, and directional skiing at speed on groomers (Lake Tahoe mountains). On deeper days and days I want to do a bit of everything, I imagine the QST 98 will be the way to go. For the Ripstick, I'm imagining it will be good early/late season, carving groomers, maneuvering moguls, but also ski it hard/directionally at speed. Do you like the Ripstick to compliment QST 98? Do you think it will support me at speed? Finally, not sure if I should go 172cm or 180cm. For the last 5 seasons, I've been on a 179cm Blizzard Peacemaker every day, 104mm underfoot.
If I may? Which width Ripstick? The 88? Personally I'd get a more frontside biased ski if you must get a narrower ski to compliment yout QST98. I think your QST98 will cover all the conditions you need it to. I say this because they, along with all the Ripsticks, are "freeride" skis (marketing speak for easy to ski for anyone and truly mediocre at everything although shocking good in 3d snow for their width). It's the skier, not the skis. Ski more; buy less.
Hey Brett! Ripstick 88 would be a fun complement to your QST 98. Works well for lighter skiers such as yourself too. FlimFlam brings up an interesting point that you could go with something more frontside oriented, but you also don't have to if you want this second ski to have some versatility too. I'd look as the Wingman 86 from Elan just as an example of a more frontside-focused ski for consideration. I do think the Ripstick 88 will support you at speed, however. I'm 20-30 lbs heavier than you and don't have any issues with it holding an edge. For length, I'm leaning towards 172 just based on your weight mostly. That will be super maneuverable in moguls too, which I think will be a lot of fun. 180 cm could work too if you'd rather boost stability. Hope that helps!
Seeking some advice, I’m Looking to buy Bent Chetler 90’s or black crow mirus cor 87’s. I probably ski equal days up at okemo and killington the east coast as I do out in park city or Breckenridge. Loved skiing the k2 poachers out in park city the last timeI was out there they were so much fun and felt playful but I feel like they would be to wide for the east coast. What do you guys think?
I don't think it's too wide for the east, and since there's a good amount of fiberglass in the ski, it's actually got pretty good grip for a twin tip. The Bent 90 is lighter and more playful, as is the Mirus Cor, but those skis feel pretty different due to the variance in turn shape. Bent 90 is a straighter cut of a ski while the Mirus Cor loves to make short, clean, and round turns, but has more of a speed limit. I think the Bent 90 is a good mix of the two others.
Great content here! Can you please compare/contrast Fischer 92 Ti with Salomon Stance 90. I was able to demo the latter but am interested in the former.
Ranger feels a little quicker and more responsive, more precise too. The Stance feels more damp and smooth, and it's also easier to release the tail edge as that ski has a little more rocker/taper in the tail. Overall, they're definitely in the same conversation and quite similar, but those are the differences I feel between them.
hello guys! between Elan Ripstick 88 and Head Kore 87 which one you would recommend? i love carving on the piste but i would also like to improve my skills off piste and have more time in the powder.
Both are fun skis, the biggest difference is flex pattern. The Ripstick is much softer, which feels more playful off-piste and allows for easier control of carving radius, but not as stable at speed. Kore is far stiffer, which makes it very responsive and reactive, but it can be harder to bend and slightly more "punishing" if you make a mistake in off-piste terrain. Both could work, although from your description I get the sense the Ripstick may be a better choice as it's easier and more forgiving off-piste.
Would love to get your take on my dilemma: Blizzard Rustler 9 or Nordica Enforcer 94?
I'm an advanced skier with no chance of demo-ing. I'm 5ft8 and 155 lbs, 27 yrs old and have been skiing for 20 years.
I already have powder/touring skis so these would be my everyday skis. I have always skied somewhat playful skis like the rustler 10s. I want to focus a little bit more on skiing harder (groomers) while still enoying relaxed days jumping at every chance I get. I understand that the blizzards are more playful and less stable, my concern is by how much.
Maybe stiffer skis can be forced to be playful but not the other way around.
What would you choose?
The Enforcer 94 is certainly on another level in terms of top-end carving performance. You have to push for it though, the high-end at lease, while the Rustler can't quite get to that level. Amazingly, the Enforcer makes some pretty nice slower and playful turns too. If your focus/emphasis is on grip and groomers, I'd go Enforcer and then just try and make do with the more freeridey stuff.
I am 190# dad living in Northern California
getting back into skiing after a 10+ year break. I used to consider myself an all all mountain intermediate/advanced skier . Not sure where to start again . I plan on doing mainly groomers but want to be able to play in the trees and be able to handle their own on a fresh power day. Any suggestions?
Hi Jeffrey! Welcome back to skiing! A lot of skis in this comparison could work well for you, but a couple stick out to me. The Armada Declivity 92 Ti and K2 Mindbender 90Ti both feel like skis that would perform really well for you. They're both skis with what I would describe as a relatively even mix of performance characteristics. Both carve well on firm snow, but have some versatility for trees, moguls, and softer snow conditions too. They're also both supportive of your weight without being too stiff or too demanding. I think those skis are a good place to start, and if you have any questions about other options, just let me know!
Good morning. I'm stuck between buying a alto of skis and I'm hoping I could get some guidance. I'm looking at 176 atomic Maverick 88ti and a 172 atomic maverick 95ti.
I'm a 5"11 (180cm) 175lbs male who is an Intermediate rider. I live in Southern California where I see plenty of groomers and a good amount of powder when traveling up north.
Hopefully you can help point out your recommended size and width. Thanks !
Hello! I think a Maverick 95 Ti makes more sense for where you live. Still good on the groomers, but will be that much more fun on a powder day if you happen to get some deep conditions. For length, 172 is just fine. Someday, you may want to go to a 180 cm length in a ski like that, but for now at the intermediate ability level, the shorter length is probably best. Hope that helps!!
OMG! Overwhelming! 5'8" 200# intermediate tahoe dad skier. Working on carving and I mostly stay on groomers but sometimes I like to hit some jumps with the kids. What do you recommend?
Ripstick, DPS, Head Core, or Black Crows
What can you test? A lot of this comes down to personal preference. You can already narrow the choices since you are mostly doing groomers. Another dimension would be preference for a demanding versus relaxed/forgiving ski.
I used to ski the Blizzard Brahma but this was too tiring/demanding and I swapped to Black Crows Vertis, which is much more fun for me.
Ripstick 88, Rustler 9, QST 92, or it might make more sense to go with an all-mountain twin tip like the K2 Poacher, Liberty Origin 96, Fischer Ranger 94... lots of other skis in that range too. I'd focus on more of a playful all-mountain ski, even something that's designed more for soft snow than carving. Skis like that can still carve and are more approachable, more forgiving, and should promote more rapid progression.
@@stevendick1562 That's what I have now Blizzard Brahma's. Looking for something more carvy.
Hey guys, I'm an intermediate-advanced skiier that loves ripping black diamonds as well as hitting the park. However, I'm from Michigan and most of my skiing is done here where there isn't a ton of powder. What kind of waist would you recommend?
I'm 6'0, 165 lbs btw
Hey Brendan! I'd say anything under 100 would be perfectly reasonable. Some good skis in the ~102 range too that I wouldn't necessarily rule out just because of width. There are plenty of skiers who prefer being on a wider ski even though they predominantly ski groomed terrain or don't get much powder. Lots of good twin tips in the mid-90 range to choose from. K2 Poacher, Armada ARV 96, Volkl Revolt 95, Line Chronic... those all feel like good options, but if you want to go wider, you certainly could. On the other side of the spectrum I wouldn't go narrower than 85 as typically skis that narrow in the twin tip world aren't build as strong as the wider models.
Hi Guy,
How would you compare the Armada 92Ti/88C to Rossingol Holyshred for someone coming new to skiing after years of boarding.
I'm 173cm 160lb and mainly will be skiing european groomed big mountain resorts.
I don't do parks much, and not a super aggressive charger, mostly would like a forgiving ski.
The Holyshred is a lot more "snowboard-like" than the more directional Armadas. Holyshred is a lot of fun, even if you're not in parks. I'd lean that route.
I've skied the Ranger and enjoyed it but I'm not in bumbs. Would the Kendo 88 be a better fit.
If you're not in bumps and are looking for grip and power, Kendo is an amazing fit.
With the Brahma 88, if I weigh 174lbs and am 5ft 9, what length do you recommend?
I would go 177 cm if I were you. 183 cm feels like overkill.
Hey guys love the reviews. Currently torn between the M-Pro 90s in a 186 and the Salomon Stance 90 in 188. I'm 6'2" and 225lbs and ski mostly early season steep groomers with some bumps, trees and soft stuff here in Europe (I guess I'm considered advanced/expert). Any other suggestions gratefully accepted. Thanks!
I find the Stance a little easier in the bumps just because there's a touch more rocker and taper in the tail. That said, if you're comfortable unweighting the tail to get it to swing around sometime, you do get a little more "oomph" when finishing a turn on the M-Pro and the tip shape is highly versatile for softer snow. They're definitely in a similar conversation. Armada Declivity 92 or Atomic Maverick 88 Ti would be interesting skis to consider too. All 4 of those skis strike a nice balance between on-trail carving and off-trail versatility. Hope that helps!
I am an older man 5'10" 195 and switched from skiing to snowboarding because skiing was hurting my knees a little now I'm 60 yrs and would like to ski again. My wife and I ski out west, Colorado and Utah, and ski and board blues. any suggestion on what skis I may like?
Hello! Focus on getting something reasonably light weight with a good amount of tip and tail rocker. Don't go wider than mid-90 underfoot as that can start to cause some knee pain. The Elan Ripsticks come to mind right away, you could either go 88 or 96. Salomon QST 92 would be a good one, or the new 2023 Fischer Ranger 96. Blizzard Rustler 9 too, but that ski is a little heavier, so can be more fatiguing. Start with those and let me know what you think.
I really don't mind if the video is longer as I'm typically going to skip to the ski's or brands that I'm already somewhat interested in. And if I'm autoplaying the whole video I'll more often than not just be listening and at that point 1 hour vs 1.5 hours doesn't really change anything.
Thanks appreciate the feedback!
A bit confused on the Stance 90 and heft. You presented the 168cm @1640 grams which is pretty light and comparable to the Declivity 92TI 180cm @ 1825 grams. Between the 2, I would presume they’re quite similar in proportional weight and the significant difference being the rocker profile and flex pattern. Not sure which one would be more approachable for bumps.
Hello! I know a 176 cm Stance 90 weighs about 1820 g. So, slightly heavier than the Declivity, but yeah, not too far off on paper. For some reason, and I don't really know why, but the Stance skis definitely feel heavier when you ski them. Probably swing weight related. Both are quite good in the bumps. Similar shape. Declivity is slightly softer in the tip, which helps it feel a little more forgiving in the bumps, IMO.
Hi guys, is there a ski between a 2022 Enforcer 100 179 and an Atomic 2022 Maverick 100 Ti 180? I've skied both and I am looking for something like the Maverick for edge control on piste, but has better initiation for entering and control in bumps. The EN 100 skids around too much for me on piste. 6ft 210lbs PNW skier - John
Black Crows Justis, Armada Declivity 102 Ti, Dynastar M-Pro 99, and K2 Mindbender 99 Ti all come to mind as possible choices.
Would be interesting if you guys picked your favourite out of the bunch!
Suggest you watch their What’s In My Quiver series for some of their personal favorites. But it’s not in their interest to rate their favorites from among the yearly comparisons. But you can pretty much tell by the way they discuss each ski which ones they like to ski more than the others.
@@christopherg.argyris8923 Thanks for the advice
As Christopher mentioned, you can generally find that information if you read between the lines so to speak. We as a company are hesitant to say things like "this ski is the best" even if it's in a subjective way. We feel strongly that what's best for me, isn't best for Bob, isn't best for you, etc. Everyone is different, which is why our Ski Test and these comparisons feel a little different than magazine tests and most other reviews.