2022 Atomic Maverick 95 Ti Ski Review with SkiEssentials.com
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 дек 2021
- Bob and Jeff have been handing the Maverick 95 Ti back and forth for the past week or so. Sometimes the "middle child" ski in a line doesn't get full attention, but the 95 sure deserves it!
Written Review: www.skiessentials.com/Chairli...
10:40, Jeff, you are spot on with your comment about Maverick. I had exactly the same experience. At first I didn't like it but now after several days on them I absolutely love it. Those skis are really something but as a skier you must be in control and tell them what you want. Light , grippy, responsive, can be aggressive, can be soft. Hard packed, soft packed, boot deep powder... no problem, they handle all that with ease :))
Great feedback, we certainly agree!
Thank you for your informative ski, boot, and binding RUclips review videos. I haven’t alpine skied in 40 years but I’ve recently moved back to Idaho and I’m look forward to this ski season here in Boise. Using your knowledge, I knew what I wanted when I went into the ski shop to purchase new equipment last week. 👍
Glad you found it useful! If your local shops are ever sold out or don't have what you're looking for, you're always welcome to shop with us too! Hope you have a fantastic season and I love that you're coming back to skiing after so much time off.
If those 2023 skis you mentioned at the end are the ones I think they are I'm VERY excited to see the next review! Thanks for the great content as always :)
Video went up yesterday, was it what you were expecting?
Exactly what I was expecting! You guys make it hard not to buy more skis haha
Shout out Jeff and Bob for being legends
Ended up picking up a pair of these. They’re incredible skis. Put them up against steep bumps and trees yesterday and they handled excellently. Very snappy turns! They do also ski very well backwards…sometimes too well if you’re not used to it lol
Sweet! Thanks for chiming in with your experience!
Love the review guys. I’ve got a Deacon for front side and rip stick black 106 for pow. This seems like a very good all mountain option for most days in park city
I do not think there is much more needed than that!
Just bought one. Exited to try them. Please god we need more snow over here.
I am no expert, but I believe you need two
You guys hit the mount point right on the mark. I’m considering moving mine back this year, they ski pretty short and the tail is really strong at the factory point. May strike a better balance at least a cm back, if not 2.
Did you remount the binding? I just got these and feel like I could use more ski in front of me.
@@stevek9943 nah I just traded them out for a ski that suits my style more. Would’ve liked to experiment but mounting is expensive
@@Dan-wo7op which ski did you get?
Hi Bob and Jeff, truly love your content and reviews.
Looking for a good all-mountain ski around the mid 90s width range (although I have considered the ~100mm models as well). I went out to Copper this year and borrowed my brother's M5 Mantra 177. The ski really ripped in the groomers (about 50% of my time) and later-day crud but I personally found it difficult on moguls (although might be the skier not the ski) and the in the 2 ft powder days we got- although it honestly was still a lot of fun everywhere, just less manageable for me in some terrain. Also found them a bit heavy later in the days when my legs got a bit tired- definitely had to have a lot more conscious decision making to keep those beasts under control. I'm 22, 5' 10', 160 lbs, relatively athletic build, and probably an intermediate-advanced skier that skis everything except for park. Looking for a ski with similar speed confidence but that's a bit lighter and easier to maneuver than the M5 with a bit more versatility off-piste. Also, to make things more difficult, not sure if I'll be east or west coast primarily as I'm graduating soon. So far, I've narrowed it down a bit to the Maverick 95 Ti, the new Ranger 96 or 94 FR, BLACKOPS Escapers, and the Ripstick 96s.
Sorry for the long post, but would really appreciate any advice in which skis I should look toward selecting for next year. Thanks!
Hey Zach! I got a few lines of text into your comment and started thinking "Maverick 95 or Ranger 96," then I noticed you commented on the Maverick review, then I noticed you listed the Ranger 96 as an option! Safe to say, I think you're on the right track here. I do think you can rule out the Escaper as that ski doesn't have as much stability or edge grip as the others. Maverick 95, Ranger 96, and Ripstick 96 would all be fantastic skis for you. Rangers are going to feel the smoothest, in my opinion. Mavericks are the most responsive, most energetic, then Ripsticks are going to feel the most playful. Ripstick Black has equal vibration damping to the Ranger 96, although the price goes up quite a bit for the Black Edition. Hope that helps!
This ski sounds siiiick, I wanna ride it!
Great review! Exactly what I’m looking for. Getting older and the Volkl’s are feeling heavier every year! They fit my old GS ski racing style, but I have to work too hard in the trees and moguls, and when I want to make quick and snappy slalom turns. Sold! On the Mavericks… the 2 of you confused me though on binding placement…
I own these and recommend at least 1 line back. I also have a pair of Kendos which I mount 2 lines back ... Either way, you're in for a treat!
They're great, and do an awesome job of providing metal-like feel but at a fraction of the weight. If you mount it on the line, you can't go wrong.
Been burning around Eastern Canada/Quebec on these and they're fantastic!!
Great to hear!
Hi guys, great video. I noticed in the Atomic BC100 video you mentioned that you could stick a Shift binding on the BC100. For a 75/25 In-bound/out- use, would the 95Ti be a good set up? Or would the weight be prohibitive? Also how does its length differ riding between the 180 and the 188?
It is not a weight prohibitive ski. At around 1800 grams, it's one of the lighter skis with metal in it, and it makes a lot of sense for a touring ski, especially one that you're using for in-bounds touring. the 180's slightly shorter turn radius make it feel a bit hookier/snappier than the 188's, which feel smoother at speed for sure.
Great video, guys! Looking for a good hardpack ski that is relatively light ‘cause I’m an older, lighter skier. I love making turns on groomers and bumps but edge hold is important to me in the East. I’ve been told that both Rustler 9 and Maverick would be good skis for me. Which holds the best on hardpack? Thanks.
Hello! I'd give the edge to the Maverick for edge grip on firm snow. Slightly longer effective edge and longer metal laminates, both of which add into that. Still agile and playful in bumps too.
Hi!
Please help.. I have tried the Rossignol Sky HD 7, and thought it was playful but to soft in tip and tail. I also tried the Mantra M5 which I like alot, but the feels a bit heavy and had to turn in tight terrain. Im skiing 70% powder, and 30 % resort.
Is there a ski inbetween those two? I want the stiffness but I also want a ski which can realase the tail and "smear" easy. Thanks.
Hi Emil! Yes, the Maverick 95 Ti is somewhere in between the Sky 7 and M5. it probably leans a little more towards the M5, but it's certainly easier to maneuver and smear than the M5. It actually sounds like it would be a fantastic ski for you, although I might consider bumping up to the 100 just given your breakdown of 70/30 powder/resort. 100 floats better and you don't sacrifice that much on trail performance. Hope that helps!
Really enjoying the rather long line of comparisons used to point out unique aspects. One name that I did not hear that seems to have some "this is unique" personality: black crows SERPO. What's your take on similarities and differences amongst the two? Tx! (excellent video, by the way - your videos have come a really long way in just a year's time)
Hey Curtis! Thanks! Actually, I would say the Serpo is a relatively similar ski. The difference there is I do think the Serpo feels like it pulls you into a turn more. It's not as straight through the shovel as the Maverick. That makes it feel more responsive on a groomer, but you do loose some of the off-piste versatility of the Maverick, IMO.
Just broke my Ranger 92ti, and Was very interested about your talk on mounting point. I had the exact same feeling off a too long hooky tail and found them great after a -1.5 cm mount. Think those might be a bit similar with a bit of back mount. How would you compare them to ranger 92ti ?
I find the Maverick more versatile and more playful overall than the Ranger 92 Ti. Similar capabilities between those two skis, the Ranger just does it with a little more precision, while the Maverick allows for easier maneuverability in tight terrain and softer snow without sacrificing too much on trail precision. I actually find the Maverick 95 Ti is a very similar ski to the new Ranger 96 from Fischer.
I'm considering finally upgrading my skis after... a long time. I was an advanced skier but I haven't been on the slopes much in the past 8 years. Looking to get back into it. I'm looking for something that would work well in Tahoe and I am 6' and likely 220+. Love going fast but I also want something relatively agile so I can handle some trees and moguls. I feel like I've narrowed my choices to these Mavericks or the Elan Ripstick 96 Blacks. Any idea what could be the better fit or if there are any other skis I should consider instead?
Volkl M6 (I'd suggest the 184 length) would be worth a good look. I'm around your size and have the M5 in my quiver; it's very stable at high speed but the rocker profile (long and low) makes it super easy to pivot around when you keep the bases flat. Lets you charge when you want to while still being maneuverable in bumps/trees. If you value stability at speed it might be just what you're after
@@src248 Yeah, those were on my list, but my brother just got a pair and I'm trying not look like too much of a copycat. Probably not the best reason to get something else, but maybe not the worst?
Hey Neil! I think both the Ripstick 96 Black or Maverick 95 would be perfectly reasonable choices. Great versatility for Tahoe terrain. Both can handle speed, but both are agile in trees and bumps too. You might not get the raw power of the M6 that Steven brought up, but you will gain more versatility. You'll get a little more stability out of the Ripstick Black over the Maverick, but the Maverick is the quickest and most agile in that grouping.
Bob could make two taped-on broomsticks look like THE planks to get. Seriously.
Someone once said the same thing about 2x4s, so now we have two interesting "skis" for Bob to test!
Seriously. I could watch these two rip all day.
Hey Guys, Great review as always. I've decided to keep my Bonafide 187's & Dalbello Lupo 130's for hard charging days. Looking for 50/50 or 70/30 set up for touring, powder, trees & bumps. Atomic Maverick 95 or 100, Head Kore 95 or 105, Nordica Enfocer 94 or 100 Unlimited. How about durability? Shift binding and Tecnica Peak Carbon Pro boots. Question re the boots: Can you swap the liner for an Intuition?
I'm a huge fan of the Maverick 95 or Kore 93 for that application. Light, still stiff and responsive, and very precise. Both seem to hold up well, and if you go with the 2023 Kore, it's more durable than before. I'd be careful about swapping liners in the tour-specific boots--likely not going to happen. Have fun!
SE
Would yall comment a little more on the differences / pros-cons between the maverick 100 and 95 under foot?
Hey Paul! Realistically, they feel very similar. I think the best way to think about it is how often you're skiing off-piste or off trail. If you're skiing off groomed snow more than 50% of your time, I think the 100 is the way to go. If you're more like 50/50 or less, the Maverick 95 is a superior carving ski just with its quickness edge to edge and slightly more torsional stiffness. The 100 has a little more float and easier edge release just due to the increased surface area. Hope that helps!
After some research, which one would you take for intermediate all mountain, ripstick 96 or this Maverick 95 Ti? I weigh 170lbs and 5'8. Probably looking at a roughly 170cm ski.
Gosh they're both great choices. Neither one is too hard to ski, but they both have very high performance ceilings. I would say the Ripstick is probably a little easier just because it has a softer longitudinal flex pattern, but that's a marginal difference in approachability. Better way to decide between the two would be to focus on how they feel. The Ripstick feel a little more playful, more bouncy, Mavericks feels more responsive and more precise, quicker too because of the increased responsiveness. They're still playful too, just in a different way. Hope that helps!
I am glad that you compared this to M6 with the skidded turns..
More versatile..
I think I will check out your mid 90s reviews..
Do these compare to past versions of the Salomon QST 92? Those almost seemed to cover so much of the skiing spectrum, they were “their own thing”.
Not really. The Maverick is quite a bit stiffer, but also lighter--it's an interesting combination of attributes. I found the older QST 92 to be agile in the tips and tails, but a bit dull underfoot. There's nothing dull about the Maverick.
I really have a hard time skiing without the sun and therefore without seeing contrast on the slopes.. how do you guys do this?
Honestly I think a lot of our comfort level in conditions like this comes from the fact that Bob and I have both been skiing Stowe for around 20 years. Bob a little more than 20, me (Jeff) a little less than 20, but we're both extremely familiar with the terrain. I probably have well over 3000 runs down the trails in this video.
What size in the 95 Ti (180 or 188) would you recommend if I'm 6' 195# and currently ski a Nordica Enforcer 110 fr in a 185 cm?
I'd probably go 180, unless you generally prefer longer skis. It's a supportive ski and I think staying a little shorter would retain more versatility, rather than going long, which would be more stable, but lose some quickness. Hope that helps! Sorry for the delay getting back to you.
How are these for a beginner/intermediate. I’m 6’4 230 pounds and I’ve had my eye on the 185cm version of these. What do you guys think in comparison to the maverick 86c or the Rossignol experience 88 ti. Really just want something that will help be develop my skills, hardest problem now is swinging the back end out on a turn.
Hey Adam! For a skiers of your size, these will work really well, even at the beginner or intermediate ability level. I would worry that the 86c would feel a little unstable and twitchy. Experience 88 or 86 (the newer skis) aren't as maneuverable as these, and I think you'd benefit more from the Maverick, specifically speaking to releasing your tail edge at the end of a turn.
Hey Bob, How much do you think that too much tail feeling is a function of the pop of these skis? If these were damp planks, might you feel differently?
It might, yeah. Skis that are damp are generally heavier and a little softer flexing. Not always, but sometimes. The lightweight feel and relatively stiff tail is definitely adding to that.
If you have the ability could you post some of your cruising speeds on your vids. The camera is deceiving. Thanks guys ... You always nail your reviews!
We actually have a radar gun because we feel like the apps inflate the speed. We found that in a straight tuck, pushing for speed on a firm day, we topped out at 44 mph. I'd say most of the cruising speeds we achieve around here are around 30-35, and that's pretty fast.
Would you guys consider this ski a good option for a fast progressing intermediate/almost advanced skier? I bought a pair of salomon s/force 7s for my first set of skis 1.5 seasons ago. Needing a more all mountain ski as I progress rapidly out in Montana. So resorts like Big Sky, Red Lodge, Bridger Bowl, etc... Thanks a bunch in advance!
Hey Greg! Definitely. What's nice about the Maverick 95 (and the 88 and 100 too) is they're relatively lightweight and user-friendly, but also stable, supportive, and have some power to them too. It won't wear you out at first and it's the type of ski you can grow into over the course of multiple seasons without ever outgrowing it. Hope that helps!
@@SkiEssentials Thank you so flipping much! Precisely what I was hoping to hear. Our groomed runs out here perpetually get chopped up very soon. So 76 under foot was becoming less and less fun as I got better. And venturing off trail with everyone else became more of a chore than fun. Even if the 95ti is a bit stiff at first, I'm all for challenging myself. I know unequivocally, it'll be far more suited for my terrain than what I have now. Great first ski, but outgrew it quick... Thanks a bunch again! Absolutely love the videos and trust your guys input more than anyone else's!
Would you put shift bindings on these to use them as touring skis or are they too heavy ?
We discussed that a few times. If you want a ripping downhill ski that's light enough for touring, we felt that this was a great option. It was agreed that this would make a better touring ski than a lot of dedicated touring skis.
Just bought the last pair avaliable in our region - this ski is preety popular. Nice to see the Ski review now right before the Season💯
Awesome! Glad you were able to snag a pair!
I'm 6'4 and 195 lbs, i ski mainly east coast and sometimes go out to western canada so generally no regular powder. Pretty aggressive on groomers but also love getting a bit more playful off the trail. Just wondeirng if the 180cm length will ber good for me. My current skis are atomic supercross sx9..thx
The 188 is a pretty big ski. It's sturdy by nature so there's not a huge incentive to size up on this one. Even though you're tall, the 180 seems like it'll fit better overall.
Please tell me, which length of skis (Mavericks 95ti) to choose, if my height is 179 cm, weight is 70 kg, and the level of skiing is average and higher. I spend more time on a prepared slope, sometimes I drive into the forest and bumps
I would go with the 172 in that ski--it's a stable ski so you can be a bit more comfortable with a slightly shorter length.
I am an intermediate skier in Alberta, Canada. I am currently trying to decide between the Maverick 95ti vs Mantra M6. Could you help me decide?
I think most intermediate skiers will prefer the Maverick 95. It's a little easier to ski than the M6, which should help promote progression. It's also a little bit lighter, which should be less fatiguing. Both are great skis, but I think the Maverick will work better for an intermediate.
How do these compare to the BC Serpo? These 2 are on my short list. Mostly ski PNW
The Serpo doesn't require as much effort to get similar performance. While the Maverick has a slightly higher gear, the Serpo is more comfortable at various speeds and levels of input. I would rather ski the Serpo in bumps and trees and other tight spots while the Maverick does have more of the race feel to it--very high horsepower rating.
6'3" 230lbs; residual athletic strength and some remaining quickness; gave up telemark 3 seasons ago, basketball last year
Would this be a good option to get slightly more top end in carving, speed and hard snow performance over my enforcer 104frees without going as far as an m6 mantra, which I loved demoing for the carving of but kicked my @#$@ in the trees and ungroomed. Also considering Rustler 9 and Stormrider 95. Would either of those two, the Maverick 95s or other give me the best chance to lock in more on groomers while being slightly more nimble and forgiving than the mantras, especially in the trees?
I think you're on the right track with the Stormrider and Maverick. Rustler is a bit too freeride-y. Stockli quality and precision oozes out of the ski like the money out of your wallet. If you can swing the cash, go with Stockli, but for a bit of a discount, the Maverick is a fantastic ski.
Same ski as Vantage CTi.They changed print, lenght and cut.
Stable, and must be skied.
Similar feel and spot on the product line, but while the CTi used a mesh of carbon and Titanal, the Mav 95 uses two full sheets and no carbon. I think it gives it a less-pingy feel than the CTi, which was a similar ripping ski.
oh man i'm struggling to make a choice, my Vantage 90TI is getting beat up and want to replace it ; maverick 88 TI or the Elan wingman or my safe bet the Brahma (which i like and skied a lot too). I ski in california and can't chase power due to family and i do prefer a narrower ski in even the most technical terrain at resorts. I spent 80% on ungroomed advanced terrain
volkl Blaze
I would go Maverick. You get a lot more versatility out of the Maverick compared to the Wingman and Brahma. Considering you spend 80% of your time in un-groomed terrain, it feels like the better choice.
How do these compare to the Stoecki storm 95s?? What’s a better tree, bump ski?
Hello! The Maverick is the better tree ski. Feels light on your feet and has more rocker and taper than the Stormrider, which makes it feel quicker when you're linking short pivoted turns. On the other hand, the Stormrider is more responsive and holds an edge better on firm snow. Smoother too, more vibration damping, but I do think the Maverick is a more versatile (and more playful) ski.
How would you guys compare this to a ranger 92ti from Fischer, feels like a lot of similarity?
It is almost the exact same as the 94FR if you have skied that. The FR is a bit more playful and has a bit more tip and tail rocker but pretty much a similar feeling ski.
I kind of agree with George. It's more like a slightly stronger Ranger 94. Maybe a good way to describe it would be if you took the shape of the 94, but with the construction of the 92. Hope that helps!
Hey Jeff what size did you ski on these? I’m 165lbs, 5’11” advance skier. It’s these vs the enforcers for me.
Jeff likes the 180 in that ski!
Do you guys get faction skis? I'm curious on your take.
Yeah, we've done some testing on Faction in recent years. We get a lot of questions about them. Fun skis, very playful, especially the CT skis, which are usually the skis I'm most excited to try.
I’d be interested to see how it compares to the Bent Chetler 100
I have not skied any of these. Guessing maverick is better on carving and higher speeds with the metal underfoot. BC a little lighter and nimble and softer for trees and bumps. BC also has more rocker and horizon in tail. So groomers = maverick, trees/bumps/park = BC. But both have a lot of overlap.
Basically everything Curtis said holds true. The Maverick has more vibration damping, better edge grip, and is more responsive when carving. On the other side of the spectrum, the Bent Chetler is more playful. It has a bouncy, fun feel. The Maverick shares some of that, but the BC is noticeably looser and more playful in off-piste terrain, softer snow, etc. Also as Curtis mentioned, there's certainly some overlap. Even more overlap with the Maverick 100 and BC 100.
Hey how would you compare these skis to Atomic Redster S9 Servotec skis ?
Whereas the S9 is far more of a slalom-based ski that excels in short turns with endless edge grip, the Maverick is decidedly more all-mountain. The width, combined with the tip and tail rocker make the Maverick quite a bit more versatile and well-rounded in a variety of conditions and terrain. If you're looking for short carves with endless grip and stability, go S9, but for a true all-mountain experience, the Maverick is phenomenal.
1cm back from true center or from recomended mounting point ?
Mount point.
So this review just makes me think that I really should get Bent Chetler 100s. BTW, I'd also be mounted 2 forward, sorry Bob.
Heck yeah Andrew, I knew someone would be on my side ;)
How does these compare to Rustler 9 and Head Kore 93?
It's actually kind of right in between those two skis in overall performance. The Rustler is heavier and with more vibration damping, the Kore is lighter and more reactive. The Maverick has a nice blend of both of those things. Very well-rounded ski. Not the strongest, not the lightest, but an excellent blend of feeling light and maneuverable while also being relatively strong and smooth.
Maverick 95 or enforcer 94 ? Especially on mostly groomed east coast hard pack?
I personally think the Enforcer is a better carving ski, while the Maverick is quicker in moguls and more playful off-piste in general. So, kind of depends what you value more. The Maverick still handles firm snow well, it just doesn't pull you into a turn like the Enforcer, which we talked about in the video quite a bit.
Vast majority of skiers are unable to develop sufficient edge angle on a 95mm underfoot width…even these guys who are good skiers tend to hop their turns especially on his right footers trying to go left. Stay in the 80’s max and use a softer ski if you live in powder area and spend time in back country.
❤👍
Can I tour with these?
Sure can!
As one of the lighter skis with two sheets of metal, it certainly blurs that line between being tour-capable an downhill-rippable.
@@SkiEssentials Awesome thank you so much.. As beginners who's never skied before, my woman and I was looking for a good ski that can pretty much do it all so we wouldn't have to buy another pair in the future. I think these may be the ones unless you could suggest something that is better if there is an all around better versatile ski out there that is.
Oh boy is this great !⛷❄️