Wether you guys will care what i say or not,i will let a reply here 1)Jin can control the devil gene better then Ryu even with his power of nothingness and the movie isnt non canon and inconsistent as they said,the director of tekken replied in a tweet in 2017 which us more recent than the tweet shown here that the movie had parts happening to the main story 2)Ryu doesnt scale to Akuma like at all,the series made it clear Ryu is a challenge to him only if he goes Evil Ryu,the manga isnt canon and its contradicting a lot of stuff the game did,plus Akuma has a moral code to not fight people not on his level,like Ryu 3)Jin beat more powerful final bosses in his series then Ryu final bosses in his series and on his own too in base form,unlike Ryu which most stuff comes from other forms mainly 4)Akuma appeared in tekken 7 and its canon to the story,Heihachi and Kazuya were evenly matched with him in their base forms,Jin beat both before and still can 5)Ryu surviving the island destruction is vague and other durability feats of his are nowhere near that island feat,which is very questionable to say he is that durable 6)the meteor Akuma punched isnt given a size and it comes from a crossover game then a street fighter game,Shin Akuma also did that not normal Akuma On short Jin was suppose to win in the fight given their stuff which death battle nitpicked or lied without checking in more detail,plus shows like death battle all agreed Jin can win,all had different arguments as to why,but all said Jin wins,yet death battle goes with the opposite only for Ryu to get a win after losing to Scorpion where he would have won
We actually encourage and enjoy comments like these cause we know that deathbattle can be a bit iffy about details and so we like seeing what fans of the respective series take on the deathbattle so thank you :)
No
Street Fighter was out almost 2 full years before DB. So maybe DB stole assets from SF?
soooo salty.
Wether you guys will care what i say or not,i will let a reply here
1)Jin can control the devil gene better then Ryu even with his power of nothingness and the movie isnt non canon and inconsistent as they said,the director of tekken replied in a tweet in 2017 which us more recent than the tweet shown here that the movie had parts happening to the main story
2)Ryu doesnt scale to Akuma like at all,the series made it clear Ryu is a challenge to him only if he goes Evil Ryu,the manga isnt canon and its contradicting a lot of stuff the game did,plus Akuma has a moral code to not fight people not on his level,like Ryu
3)Jin beat more powerful final bosses in his series then Ryu final bosses in his series and on his own too in base form,unlike Ryu which most stuff comes from other forms mainly
4)Akuma appeared in tekken 7 and its canon to the story,Heihachi and Kazuya were evenly matched with him in their base forms,Jin beat both before and still can
5)Ryu surviving the island destruction is vague and other durability feats of his are nowhere near that island feat,which is very questionable to say he is that durable
6)the meteor Akuma punched isnt given a size and it comes from a crossover game then a street fighter game,Shin Akuma also did that not normal Akuma
On short Jin was suppose to win in the fight given their stuff which death battle nitpicked or lied without checking in more detail,plus shows like death battle all agreed Jin can win,all had different arguments as to why,but all said Jin wins,yet death battle goes with the opposite only for Ryu to get a win after losing to Scorpion where he would have won
We actually encourage and enjoy comments like these cause we know that deathbattle can be a bit iffy about details and so we like seeing what fans of the respective series take on the deathbattle so thank you :)
@@atventertainment5512
Well glad to hear that,most people go with what death battle say like they are always correct