Forgive me commenting not on this video but on your "last prepping video" which had the comments turned off. I've followed you for years. I've watched MANY of your prepping videos. I own several of your books. And I've purchased a number of items you reviewed and approved of. I get why you've decided to hang it up for now. You've covered just about every topic anyone with an interest in prepping could possibly want - and I thank you for all the hard work producing them. You're not the only one who does prepping videos that I follow, but I've watched more of your videos than anyone else's. I wish you God's blessings as you try new things. I know you'll continue to prep. You just won't be taking us along. I'm nowhere near as set up as you are, but your wisdom and encouragement have kept me going. Good luck with the new channel(s).
I went down that rabbit hole. 😅 And it's DEEP.😂 Oh boy, are YOU in for a treat! 🤣 Buzz Aldred said to an 8 year old girl we never went to the moon. Also, NASA came out in February 2019, and said "Oops, we made a mistake. The moon really is in our atmosphere!" on their own website. 😅 And the man that filmed the moon landing, said on his deathbed, that he filmed it in a studio. And if we still have a problem getting from one town to another with a cellphone even now, how can anyone believe Nixon called the moon? 😂🤣😏👍
It all looked so real as my at time, 9 year old self watched this unfold on tv. Walter Cronkite narrated this event and who wouldn't believe him? Many years later, I heard someone comment about the simple technology that existed at the time and how truly impossible it would have been for such a feat to be accomplished.
They 100 percent said that we haven’t been to the moon!!!! Just like I’ve always known. I was a kid watching the “moon landing” bullshit live with my grandpa. A caption on the tv screen said LIVE FROM THE MOON. The camera happened to pan a little too far one way or the other and picked up a dump truck in what I remember to be a quarry or maybe a desert setting. Ol’ grandpa quickly noticed it and brought it to everyone’s attention before the camera quickly shifted back. Since that day I’ve put about as much credibility and trust in the government as I have the tooth fairy. Merry Christmas!!!
I’ve also seen a nasa engineer taking question at a news conference and someone asked him about inhabiting mars. He said we first have to get through the Van Allen belt. Hmmm that’s between the earth and mars lol.
Who held the cameras at all the different angles if the moon landing. All we know is what is told to us. We have never seen the earth from any other angle
"It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in..." (Isaiah 40:22). Even Aristotle said that the earth is a sphere because one can see the curvature of the earth's shadow on the face of the moon during an eclipse.
All my kids are now in their 30s but when they were young my dad drug us from space museums to space centers. I didnt believe the whole thing then but didnt want to argue with dad and it was a special time for him with the grandkids. You can look at that equipment and know it was on a movie set and not in space. Makes me wonder what else they have lied about.
That astronaut doesn't know what he is talking about. Also don't put words in his mouth, he did not say we have not been to the moon he did say that the moon is one of the destinations along with others that we could visit.
Scripture is clear there’s a Firmament and you cant land on a luminary. also if you believe scripture and the story of the Tower of Babel, God has not changed his mind.
Maybe, he's talking about us not having the machines"heavy rockets" like we did in years past that we don't have anymore because our focus has been different since back then
No way we went to the Moon in 1969 and there are zero hotels to visit now. This is what human do they visit places then ruin them with too many destinations
I think that you might have misinterpreted what he said. I think he was talking in particular about that rocket vehicle type and what it is capable of and not talking about the rockets, etc. That were used in the moon missions.
He never said we haven't been to the moon. He simply said we need to build bigger rockets and better stuff so we can travel to the moon, Mars, etc. I think you are reading too much into his response. BTW - Merry Christmas to all.
That's what I heard also. I think he was referring to the bigger rocket to carry more equipment, possibly living pods to stay on the moon, mars, etc. Saying more that they don't have the stuff laying around. All they have right now is enough to stay in orbit and no farther. I can't say if we've been to the moon or not. But i'm the cynical type. 😅
M.D. I love your videos and books, but I have to respectfully disagree with you on this one.What the astronaut said is that NASA does not *currently* have the ability to launch moon missions due to the lack of a heavy booster rocket. (Although SpaceX does have one, apparently.) The Saturn V booster of the late 1960's *was* capable of lifting both a small command module and lunar landing module. IMO he did *not* say that we have *never* landed on the moon. I was a young teenager when the first lunar landing occurred. I was also interested in Ham radio at that time and I knew that if the landing did not occur, then some ham or hams would have spoken up, because it was likely many hams were listening to the lunar communications by using a beam antenna pointed at the moon. Also, the Russians had the ability to monitor our astronaut comms and I doubt they would allow us to have faked the landings. The USSR would have jumped at the chance to embarass their mortal enemy. Don't forget, the 1960s were the height of the Cold War. Merry Christmas. Please keep fighting the good fight, and keep making videos. All the best to you.
No he said we haven't been. But so you're saying we did in 1969... Lost the ability after that... But now got it back. But I'm not sure what you're disagreeing with since I didn't say either way... I said I didn't know.
@@TheViewFromAppalachia Its all about the money. It was horrendously expensive and there was no obvious payback. Also, after numerous visits to the moon, people lost interest as it became routine. So, massive NASA budgets did not have popular taxpayer support in Congress. The Saturn V rockets were massively labor intensive to build. Today we have CNC machines that do the work of the highly skilled machines in 1960s and a much, much lower cost. Furthermore, much of NASA was civilian cover for the military. We learned most all we needed to dominate space for military and intelligence assets. A final point: there was, and maybe still is, little to no benefit to sending humans on space missions, other than to disburse humanity off world. The reason is that robots and drones can do almost everything we want, at least from a research and scientific discovery point of view. It is very expensive to provide a living environment, air, food, water, waste handling, etc. It is much more cost effective to send machines.
If you look through the Bible about the firmament, it clearly says that there is water above the firmament. The old definition of a firmament is a vault.
Maybe he is referring to the equipment that we currently have is not capable ? Right now, we don't even have the equipment to recover these two astronauts.
He could be a diversity hire. Also, I spent an awful lot of tax money on NASA. If it was all lies where is that money? He also didn't mention the space shuttles. I actually have touched one and know someone who worked on the propulsion system. He could just basivally be ignorant.
I believe what they are saying is that since the Apollo missions ended, the United States have not had power enough rockets to break earth orbit. Only now have we invested enough money and know how to get back to the moon. That's just what I thought about it.
Don't believe we went to the moon, but you could take the astronaut's words to mean "we don't have anything right now" that can get us there. We don't have big Saturn 5 rockets to launch that might be powerful enough, because they are long ago out of commission.
Omg, people are so disconnected,,, searching so hard for an alternative answer to his very obvious answer! If we are not able to break through today, we definitely did not MANY years ago!
......But, with that said ⤴️,,,, another question is,,, how much can we trust this particular video lol,,, with all the confusing lies and deception that we're constantly being fed,,,,who knows anymore what's fact and what's fiction! Regardless, I say NO, we never went to the moon.
Also seems they are actually sitting on something (that has been taken out of video). Are they actually filming this from some room at NASA? They should be floating around if they were in zero gravity. Another bullshit video.
He’s basically saying that “today” we don’t have a vehicle capable of deep solar system travel. But he didn’t say, we used to have the Saturn IV which was capable.
The moon is in earth’s orbit, not sure why he would say it would allow us to go outside of earth’s orbit, to the moon and Mars. Mars is outside of earth’s orbit, but the moon isn’t. Could’ve been a slip up, but maybe not.
He said right now we can't leave orbit. It wasn't stated that we never had the capability to do so. There have always been questions about what actually has happened with space travel.
There's a dome over the earth that cannot be penetrated. Welcome to the simulation. I'm absolutely convinced it's a simulation. If you ever want to discuss it let me know. lol
There is also a video that show the “astronauts “ in the space station and they are suppose to be in zero gravity but they have a ball and it falls and hits the ground durning a live broadcast lol. It’s fine that we haven’t been able to do it I mean who really gives a crap. It’s the fact that it proves the lies that they are capable of telling for so many years that is baffling. That’s what ticks people off the most.
The Earth's definitely not flat, I'm 100% sure of that. But the Earth doesn't have to be flat and covered by some ridiculous dome or whatever and outer space doesn't have to be fake haha for the moon landing to have never happened.
I heard the Space Shuttle Columbia crash and watched a lot of them come in for a landing and pass over. In context they`re saying that at the time this was filmed that they didn`t currently have the spacecraft to leave orbit. We also don`t have the factories they once had to build Model T cars. The old 50s/60s Apollo technology would be even more expensive to build today and the factories for the parts and people who came up with it all are long gone. But they`re developing new ones like the Orion spacecraft mentioned in the clip. At the time this was filmed the Orion spacecraft was being tested to see if the modern computers and digital hardware designs could survive outside the protective magnetic field of earth in the cosmic radiation outside low earth orbit. They did unmanned testing so nobody would be at risk. It passed. So the statements they made are no longer true. The Apollo rope computers were handmade and the factories used to build all of the parts no longer exist and neither do the people who designed and made them. The program was shut down by taxpayers because it was so expensive so they developed the Voyager & Pioneer probes and the Shuttles which were less expensive.
@@TheViewFromAppalachia They shut down the Apollo program and scrapped everything because it was too expensive. Taxpayers demanded an end to it. They used the rockets they had left to launch the Pioneer and Voyager probes. We have no technology in place to build old Model T cars either without retooling everything and building factories. Why? Because it was scrapped too. We have NEW technology now...Orion...which exists and passed the testing. The video clip is outdated and out of context. It`s that simple.
@@TheViewFromAppalachia We went repeatedly and landed repeatedly until the 1970s when taxpayers shut it down. Multiple countries took pictures of the landing sites proving they`re there and they brought back hundreds of pounds of rocks and dust. This is just part of the evidence. They were also tracked on radar and by amateur radio operators with dish antennas and amateur astronomers with telescopes. All this silly stuff has been debunked for decades.
Uh, no, they don’t. Generally the demarcation between the atmosphere and outer space is considered to be the Karman line, which is 100km or 62 miles, but the most generous definition puts the extreme outer layer of the atmosphere (the exosphere) at 10,000km or 6200 miles. The moon on the other hand is 239,000 miles away, so it hasn’t somehow moved 233,000 miles closer.
He didn't say we never went to the moon. He said that we don't have equipment (as in right now) to land on the moon. The original moon landing was over 50 years ago and none of that equipment is still in service. Neither are the much newer space shuttles.
@TheViewFromAppalachia We have less transportation for people but we have more robots, and robots make more sense for space exploration than people. Or so I've heard. It makes sense to me even though it's kinda disappointing in a way.
The biggest thing people mention why we couldn't get to the moon because we do not have the technology to protect ourselves from the Van Allen radiation belt.
Robot head was there. The actual landing on tv was fake. All 4something A.i. . Oh its hallow 2. Rings like bell. Oh hey we have the rocks in a museum in Wapakoneta. But never question it while on a tour😂. Driveway rocks😂
I got more for you.. the earth is also flat. Before you freak out let me say i know this because I've seen it. In 1989 I took the concord from NY to spain. The concord flies 3x higher than any other commercial aircraft. When we were up there I looked out the window and distinctively remember saying to myself where the F is the curve. You would think from 60,000 feet you would see at least a slight curve.. but nope nothing.. just a flat plain. Merry Christmas
Right! 😳. So the literally over SIX HUNDRED people that have orbited the earth from altitudes as high as 220 nautical miles up, not your 11 miles of the _Concorde_ some for as much as 1.8 YEARS, that have orbited the earth at 18,000 mph, and seen the GLOBE turn under them constantly on average once every 90 minutes, watching the sun rise and set repeatedly, and watched the demarcation of the sunrise line flow across the SPHERE of the earth as the GLOBE turns are all mistaken! And all the other passengers on the Concorde, as well as all the British and French pilots and crews that flew it for TWENTY-SEVEN years, missed this massive fact that only you picked up on in a single trip looking out the window!?? Ookay! 🙄
@@E.L.RipleyAtNostromo All I know is I watched many many hours of very convincing videos, commentaries and interviews all about flat earth. There are many things that don’t make sense about a globe earth. If you do a deep dive into it you might be surprised. Stuff like many examples of planes making emergency landings, flying from Dubai to NewYork for example and they land in some city that is NO where near the flight path if it was a globe earth but is in line on a flat earth map. Other things like seeing someone standing on the shore 50miles across the bay in Detroit with a telescope where if the earth was curved there would be literally a few hundred feet of water blocking the view. Also pilots saying when asked they don’t correct for curvature of the earth. Most windows in planes have a slight curve and are designed to be “fish eye” lenses. Not 100% convinced but they lied about everything else why not this too. Read the Bible it talks about a firmament. Also some words to describe earth in the Bible are circle and not ball or sphere. Why is that?
@@MaritimeHomesteaderBecause the Bible is 2000 years old, first written in Aramaic and then translated 32 times!?? Do you think? People are capable of manufacturing any delusions they want, and your post is proof of that. Have a nice Christmas.
@@E.L.RipleyAtNostromo I was talking about the Aramaic and Greek words used to describe the earth. If you cross referenced using Strongs concordance for the original words used in the original script you will see what I mean. There was a word for sphere or ball but the one for circle was used. Anyways… The Bible is legit. It’s never once been disproven. On the contrary though, it’s been proven to be accurate archeologically, geographically, scientifically, and historically. Merry Christmas to you as well!
@@E.L.RipleyAtNostromo I’m well aware of the delusions people believe like what the news told the masses about 911, the CV19 pandemic and the Vaxx just to name a few. Not sure if you believe they landed on the moon too but they didn’t. Just sayin
Look up Astro Not Buzz Aldrin telling his granddaughter they never went to the moon, when she asked him why they never went back there. It is easy to find on RUclips.
Merry Christmas MD. Watch the movie A funny thing happened on the way to the moon. I’ve researched the lunar landing quite a bit. Didn’t happen. Jus sayin
I've wondered about the flat earth thing. In the Bible, it says that that God dwells in a place of unapproachable light. That's got to be crazy far from here given we are surrounded by darkness. Now, even from 30,000 feet, when I look out and down upon the earth, it looks flat. Edited to add: Appearance of based upon perspective. The information translated in our brains into information is basically programming. I've wondered if what I see really is what it looks like our if it's just the way my brain is outputting information. That can descend into a mind bending conversation though and my buddies usually stop talking and look at me funny because if you think about it, everything we experience is output from the brain. Or, maybe it's not. Maybe schizophrenic are somehow hacking into other programing or systems. Merry Christmas...
The bible also says, "As far as the east is from the west He has removed my transgressions..." You can go east forever and never reach west....but if you go north you will switch to going south after you cross the north pole. So clearly whoever wrote that was describing the earth as a globe.
I'm with family right now, so can't do Scripture, but as I understand it...we cannot travel past the firmament. Unless you wormhole. I will look it up when I get home and get back with you! 🙋♀️♥️
The word Firmament in Genesis' context means an expanse or a large empty space. Also in the KJB, they are classified as the three heavens which only two are able to be reached in the physical existence. The sky is the first heaven, outer space is the second heaven and the third heaven (the "heaven" most are familiar with) is where the Lord Jesus Christ sits at the right hand of the Father. The third heaven always was and always will be and was here before Genesis 1 of course. In the N.T. Paul mentioned being caught up in the spirit into the third heaven. If there's a third heaven, that demands that there's a first and second one and later on in the KJB after Genesis, they're defined as "the stars in heaven" and "the fowls that fly in the open firmament of heaven". That's outer space and the sky, respectively. The KJB never taught a flat Earth. The people who say it does don't know of the three heavens, they take verses out of context and they take figurative words and verses 100% literal and get into a big confusing mess which leads to them imagining the Earth being flat and there's a dome covering it which isn't true. Then you have a lot of people who read non-canonical books like Enoch and the Apocrypha for examples and they get even more confused and think planets are luminaries and angels look like a bunch of wheels connected together with eyes all over the sides haha. The correct thing to do is to stick to the inspired, inerrant and preserved scriptures/words of God and they're found only in the 66 books of the King James Bible.
You apparently don't know the history of the first moon "landing" it was to beat Russia or at least lead the world into thinking we were more advanced than Russia... As for now it would be a good way to filter off cash into a black budget.
"thou shall not bear false witness" haha, it is pretty obvious that the group from that swampy town has pretty much broken every commandment for the majority of its existence... "the means justify the ends" Here mr native american, we care about you, try these free blankets this winter!
I have watched hundereds of hours of moon landing and read alot about NASA Moon Project. We did not go land on the moon. We might have orbited the moon ,but never landed. We did not have to technology to land. Think about it if we could land on the Moon, Why could we not land on Earth instead of crashing down in the sea.
Nope we never went to the moon. Have you seen the avionics on early 70s planes? Even military jets from the late 60s - 70s had crude avionics. But we flew to the moon. Who placed the camera on the moon when they made "man's first step onto it"? Also look into to the Van Allen belt. The radiation they would have been exposed to would have killed them. Great video and perfect t timing.
Everyone knows they don't have the technology to go to the moon anymore, that is what the video is actually talking about. However, did we ever have it is a different question and not what this video is exposing.
I'm no expert either,but I can hear an rocket man said,we need to build something🤷else before they can go to the moon. Maybe their u f o aliens will help them. 🤫 🐿️👍
I’m sorry M.D., I love your channel, but the two statements aren’t mutually exclusive. He’s talking about future endeavors, not negating the past. We’ve CLEARLY been to the moon, with Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17, and 12 men have walked on the moon. They’ve left the aft parts of their LEM’s, AND the rover vehicles, it’s all there and can be seen with a telescope. Again, I love your channel brother, but you’re conflating two different things, and making an incorrect assumption based on one statement that is stating current and future tech, not disregarding past accomplishments. We had a Saturn V booster in the ‘60’s and ‘70’s, then a Space Shuttle after, and don’t have either of those now, so he’s talking about what new tech is being developed. Thanks for all your content, and Merry Christmas!
@ Basically that’s it. Thing is, the shuttle was _supposed_to be a more cost efficient way to get us back into space, but it never went past 220 miles or so, and was used mostly to conduct experiments and help build and supply the ISS. Then two of the orbiters blew up, the money ran out I guess, and they retired the shuttle fleet. I was hoping they’d keep it going, but it was older technology. I’m not sure what programs he’s talking about now, but maybe Musk and SpaceX will also have something to get us back to the Moon? As it is, the Chinese are already on the way, which is concerning.
MD i watch the moon landing as a kid my father want me to watch this on the tv, gess what i ask my father i see them landing ,is this the first time, yes, well who on the moon fliming the landing , he trun the channel the same ever time
Video link - ruclips.net/video/LFKM9LmUdMs/видео.html
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Astronauts Terry Virts and Samantha Cristoforetti
Man has never set foot on the moon, he just admitted that to everyone!!
Forgive me commenting not on this video but on your "last prepping video" which had the comments turned off. I've followed you for years. I've watched MANY of your prepping videos. I own several of your books. And I've purchased a number of items you reviewed and approved of. I get why you've decided to hang it up for now. You've covered just about every topic anyone with an interest in prepping could possibly want - and I thank you for all the hard work producing them. You're not the only one who does prepping videos that I follow, but I've watched more of your videos than anyone else's. I wish you God's blessings as you try new things. I know you'll continue to prep. You just won't be taking us along. I'm nowhere near as set up as you are, but your wisdom and encouragement have kept me going. Good luck with the new channel(s).
Glad to have you here on this channel. You'll find it interesting I believe.
My Grandmaw never believed they went to the moon.
Smart grandma
If our present is very scripted then it's likely so was our past.
I went down that rabbit hole. 😅 And it's DEEP.😂 Oh boy, are YOU in for a treat! 🤣 Buzz Aldred said to an 8 year old girl we never went to the moon. Also, NASA came out in February 2019, and said "Oops, we made a mistake. The moon really is in our atmosphere!" on their own website. 😅 And the man that filmed the moon landing, said on his deathbed, that he filmed it in a studio. And if we still have a problem getting from one town to another with a cellphone even now, how can anyone believe Nixon called the moon? 😂🤣😏👍
AMEN WELL SAID
Thanks for bringing thought provoking topics! Good job MD
It all looked so real as my at time, 9 year old self watched this unfold on tv. Walter Cronkite narrated this event and who wouldn't believe him? Many years later, I heard someone comment about the simple technology that existed at the time and how truly impossible it would have been for such a feat to be accomplished.
Definitely think they have lied to us all along - many blessings :)
My grandfather used to say we never went to the moon. He said it was a movie set.
Oh c'mon Nixon made a call to the Astronaughts on the moon via a landline telephone. LOL, people believed that :- )
Lol...
@@TheViewFromAppalachia Dude you can see the flag and landing with a high powered telescope.they mean they dont have it today.but elon surely does!
Dude you can see the flag and landing with a high powered telescope.they mean they dont have it today.but elon surely does!
They 100 percent said that we haven’t been to the moon!!!! Just like I’ve always known.
I was a kid watching the “moon landing” bullshit live with my grandpa. A caption on the tv screen said LIVE FROM THE MOON. The camera happened to pan a little too far one way or the other and picked up a dump truck in what I remember to be a quarry or maybe a desert setting. Ol’ grandpa quickly noticed it and brought it to everyone’s attention before the camera quickly shifted back.
Since that day I’ve put about as much credibility and trust in the government as I have the tooth fairy.
Merry Christmas!!!
And no one else saw this? I think it was your Tonka truck behind the TV, because literally not a single other person saw this.
@ So you’ve checked with everyone?
we have been deceived to no end
I’ve also seen a nasa engineer taking question at a news conference and someone asked him about inhabiting mars. He said we first have to get through the Van Allen belt. Hmmm that’s between the earth and mars lol.
Who held the cameras at all the different angles if the moon landing. All we know is what is told to us. We have never seen the earth from any other angle
Same questions I’ve had
That’s always my thought..we set up the cameras to record it land and then them getting out
have a awesome day, merry christmas, and have yourself a wonderful new year
Merry Christmas! Good to see you today!
"It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in..." (Isaiah 40:22). Even Aristotle said that the earth is a sphere because one can see the curvature of the earth's shadow on the face of the moon during an eclipse.
All my kids are now in their 30s but when they were young my dad drug us from space museums to space centers. I didnt believe the whole thing then but didnt want to argue with dad and it was a special time for him with the grandkids. You can look at that equipment and know it was on a movie set and not in space. Makes me wonder what else they have lied about.
I never really thought we went to the moon. But- why do this and lie to us? What was their benefit, their end game?
To beat Russia... even if they had to lie about it.
@@TheViewFromAppalachia...🎯
@@TheViewFromAppalachia 💯
This is only one of many "mis-representations".
The full truth about everything and the motives behind the veil will be astounding !
The CCTV footage of a marathon - shows it isn't what we were led to believe either.
They do rituals and pay homage to fallen angels also. Name their journeys for gods. Like Apollo
That astronaut doesn't know what he is talking about. Also don't put
words in his mouth, he did not say we have not been to the moon he
did say that the moon is one of the destinations along with others
that we could visit.
I think you need to watch it again lol. Anyways, have a good one.
Scripture is clear there’s a Firmament and you cant land on a luminary. also if you believe scripture and the story of the Tower of Babel, God has not changed his mind.
I agree with you, He also said what they think of they can do!!!
Maybe, he's talking about us not having the machines"heavy rockets" like we did in years past that we don't have anymore because our focus has been different since back then
So we had the ability almost 60 years ago but not now... If that's the case that tells us a lot lol. What happened?
No way we went to the Moon in 1969 and there are zero hotels to visit now. This is what human do they visit places then ruin them with too many destinations
Merry Christmas Md
I think that you might have misinterpreted what he said. I think he was talking in particular about that rocket vehicle type and what it is capable of and not talking about the rockets, etc. That were used in the moon missions.
No, I don't think so...
One word,
Astro NOT!😉
Neil Armstrong has said that he never went.
hmmm Was it only a paper moon.. i dont know, And i sure do wonder. I KNOW I CANT TRUST MY GOVERNMENT THOUGH.
We can't get thru the Firmament.
Merry christmas MD
He never said we haven't been to the moon. He simply said we need to build bigger rockets and better stuff so we can travel to the moon, Mars, etc. I think you are reading too much into his response. BTW - Merry Christmas to all.
That's what I heard also. I think he was referring to the bigger rocket to carry more equipment, possibly living pods to stay on the moon, mars, etc. Saying more that they don't have the stuff laying around. All they have right now is enough to stay in orbit and no farther.
I can't say if we've been to the moon or not.
But i'm the cynical type. 😅
M.D. I love your videos and books, but I have to respectfully disagree with you on this one.What the astronaut said is that NASA does not *currently* have the ability to launch moon missions due to the lack of a heavy booster rocket. (Although SpaceX does have one, apparently.) The Saturn V booster of the late 1960's *was* capable of lifting both a small command module and lunar landing module. IMO he did *not* say that we have *never* landed on the moon.
I was a young teenager when the first lunar landing occurred. I was also interested in Ham radio at that time and I knew that if the landing did not occur, then some ham or hams would have spoken up, because it was likely many hams were listening to the lunar communications by using a beam antenna pointed at the moon. Also, the Russians had the ability to monitor our astronaut comms and I doubt they would allow us to have faked the landings. The USSR would have jumped at the chance to embarass their mortal enemy. Don't forget, the 1960s were the height of the Cold War.
Merry Christmas. Please keep fighting the good fight, and keep making videos.
All the best to you.
No he said we haven't been. But so you're saying we did in 1969... Lost the ability after that... But now got it back. But I'm not sure what you're disagreeing with since I didn't say either way... I said I didn't know.
@@TheViewFromAppalachia Its all about the money. It was horrendously expensive and there was no obvious payback. Also, after numerous visits to the moon, people lost interest as it became routine. So, massive NASA budgets did not have popular taxpayer support in Congress.
The Saturn V rockets were massively labor intensive to build. Today we have CNC machines that do the work of the highly skilled machines in 1960s and a much, much lower cost.
Furthermore, much of NASA was civilian cover for the military. We learned most all we needed to dominate space for military and intelligence assets.
A final point: there was, and maybe still is, little to no benefit to sending humans on space missions, other than to disburse humanity off world. The reason is that robots and drones can do almost everything we want, at least from a research and scientific discovery point of view. It is very expensive to provide a living environment, air, food, water, waste handling, etc. It is much more cost effective to send machines.
I've often wondered why the Soviets back then didn't expose us if we were faking it. They wouldn't have missed that opportunity to embarrass us
If you look through the Bible about the firmament, it clearly says that there is water above the firmament. The old definition of a firmament is a vault.
Merry Christmas, M.D. And Happy Birthday to me. lol. Have a wonderful week ahead.
Maybe they forgot the technology they used before . Lol
Lol
The Russians landed on the moon we didn't.
Maybe he is referring to the equipment that we currently have is not capable ? Right now, we don't even have the equipment to recover these two astronauts.
Why didn’t he just say that?
So they lied yo us ? Not surprised!
He could be a diversity hire. Also, I spent an awful lot of tax money on NASA. If it was all lies where is that money? He also didn't mention the space shuttles. I actually have touched one and know someone who worked on the propulsion system. He could just basivally be ignorant.
I believe what they are saying is that since the Apollo missions ended, the United States have not had power enough rockets to break earth orbit. Only now have we invested enough money and know how to get back to the moon. That's just what I thought about it.
So we did it in 1969 but lost the ability... cool.
Don't believe we went to the moon, but you could take the astronaut's words to mean "we don't have anything right now" that can get us there. We don't have big Saturn 5 rockets to launch that might be powerful enough, because they are long ago out of commission.
Omg, people are so disconnected,,, searching so hard for an alternative answer to his very obvious answer! If we are not able to break through today, we definitely did not MANY years ago!
......But, with that said ⤴️,,,, another question is,,, how much can we trust this particular video lol,,, with all the confusing lies and deception that we're constantly being fed,,,,who knows anymore what's fact and what's fiction! Regardless, I say NO, we never went to the moon.
Also seems they are actually sitting on something (that has been taken out of video). Are they actually filming this from some room at NASA? They should be floating around if they were in zero gravity. Another bullshit video.
I watched it "live" on my TV with my friend 🙄
LETS DEFONE "SPACE" USING ITS SCIENTIFIC PARAMETERS.
NO WE, "HUMANS" ; HAVE NEVER ENTERED SPACE.
merry Christmas M.D.
He’s basically saying that “today” we don’t have a vehicle capable of deep solar system travel. But he didn’t say, we used to have the Saturn IV which was capable.
Merry Christmas MD !! Hope you had a wonderful day !
Thanks, you too!
They said that we do not have the craft "today". We may have in 1969 and "lost the directions" and now NASA is working on the duplication, Orion.
So we were more technically advanced and able almost 60 years ago and could do it then but just can't now .. cool.
Yeah, technology was so much more advanced back then lmao 🤣😂 Today they are still trying to figure out how they did something that long ago lmao 🤣😂
It’s flat. Can’t get past the firmament. (Van Allen Belts)
The moon is in earth’s orbit, not sure why he would say it would allow us to go outside of earth’s orbit, to the moon and Mars. Mars is outside of earth’s orbit, but the moon isn’t. Could’ve been a slip up, but maybe not.
Remember the movie Capricorn One.
I do, great _fictional_ movie.
He said right now we can't leave orbit. It wasn't stated that we never had the capability to do so. There have always been questions about what actually has happened with space travel.
So we could in 1969 with that technology but we lost it... Cool.
We have not!
He was talking about the Orian space ship only not other methods
That's not what I heard... But okay... Cool.
They said Nixon talked to them on the phone to congratulate them. Ask your "friends".
There's a dome over the earth that cannot be penetrated. Welcome to the simulation. I'm absolutely convinced it's a simulation. If you ever want to discuss it let me know. lol
There is also a video that show the “astronauts “ in the space station and they are suppose to be in zero gravity but they have a ball and it falls and hits the ground durning a live broadcast lol. It’s fine that we haven’t been able to do it I mean who really gives a crap. It’s the fact that it proves the lies that they are capable of telling for so many years that is baffling. That’s what ticks people off the most.
Merry Xmas, MD!
Maybe we should ask the Moussad; they have all the intel.
if u look at the horizon over the ocean, the horizon is curved. enough evidence for me that its not flat
The Earth's definitely not flat, I'm 100% sure of that. But the Earth doesn't have to be flat and covered by some ridiculous dome or whatever and outer space doesn't have to be fake haha for the moon landing to have never happened.
Leaving the earth is heresy. Think about the Tower of Babel for example…
I heard the Space Shuttle Columbia crash and watched a lot of them come in for a landing and pass over. In context they`re saying that at the time this was filmed that they didn`t currently have the spacecraft to leave orbit. We also don`t have the factories they once had to build Model T cars. The old 50s/60s Apollo technology would be even more expensive to build today and the factories for the parts and people who came up with it all are long gone. But they`re developing new ones like the Orion spacecraft mentioned in the clip.
At the time this was filmed the Orion spacecraft was being tested to see if the modern computers and digital hardware designs could survive outside the protective magnetic field of earth in the cosmic radiation outside low earth orbit. They did unmanned testing so nobody would be at risk. It passed. So the statements they made are no longer true. The Apollo rope computers were handmade and the factories used to build all of the parts no longer exist and neither do the people who designed and made them. The program was shut down by taxpayers because it was so expensive so they developed the Voyager & Pioneer probes and the Shuttles which were less expensive.
So we went in 1969 but then lost the ability...
@@TheViewFromAppalachia They shut down the Apollo program and scrapped everything because it was too expensive. Taxpayers demanded an end to it. They used the rockets they had left to launch the Pioneer and Voyager probes. We have no technology in place to build old Model T cars either without retooling everything and building factories. Why? Because it was scrapped too. We have NEW technology now...Orion...which exists and passed the testing. The video clip is outdated and out of context. It`s that simple.
@@TheViewFromAppalachia We went repeatedly and landed repeatedly until the 1970s when taxpayers shut it down. Multiple countries took pictures of the landing sites proving they`re there and they brought back hundreds of pounds of rocks and dust. This is just part of the evidence. They were also tracked on radar and by amateur radio operators with dish antennas and amateur astronomers with telescopes. All this silly stuff has been debunked for decades.
They now say the moon is within the earth's atmosphere
Uh, no, they don’t. Generally the demarcation between the atmosphere and outer space is considered to be the Karman line, which is 100km or 62 miles, but the most generous definition puts the extreme outer layer of the atmosphere (the exosphere) at 10,000km or 6200 miles. The moon on the other hand is 239,000 miles away, so it hasn’t somehow moved 233,000 miles closer.
Inside the Firmament, yes
The moon travels around the earth as the earth orbit orbits... so I don't think what was said makes much sense.
He didn't say we never went to the moon. He said that we don't have equipment (as in right now) to land on the moon. The original moon landing was over 50 years ago and none of that equipment is still in service. Neither are the much newer space shuttles.
So we have less tech and ability now than we did nearly 60 years ago... Cool.
@TheViewFromAppalachia We have less transportation for people but we have more robots, and robots make more sense for space exploration than people. Or so I've heard. It makes sense to me even though it's kinda disappointing in a way.
The belt actually is around the Earth.
The biggest thing people mention why we couldn't get to the moon because we do not have the technology to protect ourselves from the Van Allen radiation belt.
Where did he say we never went to the moon!!!
Listen again.
With a good telescope and right location, you can see the rover and lunar lander base.
Have you seen it?
Robot head was there. The actual landing on tv was fake. All 4something A.i. . Oh its hallow 2. Rings like bell. Oh hey we have the rocks in a museum in Wapakoneta. But never question it while on a tour😂. Driveway rocks😂
I got more for you.. the earth is also flat. Before you freak out let me say i know this because I've seen it. In 1989 I took the concord from NY to spain. The concord flies 3x higher than any other commercial aircraft. When we were up there I looked out the window and distinctively remember saying to myself where the F is the curve. You would think from 60,000 feet you would see at least a slight curve.. but nope nothing.. just a flat plain. Merry Christmas
Right! 😳. So the literally over SIX HUNDRED people that have orbited the earth from altitudes as high as 220 nautical miles up, not your 11 miles of the _Concorde_ some for as much as 1.8 YEARS, that have orbited the earth at 18,000 mph, and seen the GLOBE turn under them constantly on average once every 90 minutes, watching the sun rise and set repeatedly, and watched the demarcation of the sunrise line flow across the SPHERE of the earth as the GLOBE turns are all mistaken! And all the other passengers on the Concorde, as well as all the British and French pilots and crews that flew it for TWENTY-SEVEN years, missed this massive fact that only you picked up on in a single trip looking out the window!?? Ookay! 🙄
@@E.L.RipleyAtNostromo
All I know is I watched many many hours of very convincing videos, commentaries and interviews all about flat earth. There are many things that don’t make sense about a globe earth. If you do a deep dive into it you might be surprised. Stuff like many examples of planes making emergency landings, flying from Dubai to NewYork for example and they land in some city that is NO where near the flight path if it was a globe earth but is in line on a flat earth map. Other things like seeing someone standing on the shore 50miles across the bay in Detroit with a telescope where if the earth was curved there would be literally a few hundred feet of water blocking the view. Also pilots saying when asked they don’t correct for curvature of the earth.
Most windows in planes have a slight curve and are designed to be “fish eye” lenses. Not 100% convinced but they lied about everything else why not this too.
Read the Bible it talks about a firmament. Also some words to describe earth in the Bible are circle and not ball or sphere. Why is that?
@@MaritimeHomesteaderBecause the Bible is 2000 years old, first written in Aramaic and then translated 32 times!?? Do you think? People are capable of manufacturing any delusions they want, and your post is proof of that. Have a nice Christmas.
@@E.L.RipleyAtNostromo
I was talking about the Aramaic and Greek words used to describe the earth. If you cross referenced using Strongs concordance for the original words used in the original script you will see what I mean. There was a word for sphere or ball but the one for circle was used.
Anyways…
The Bible is legit. It’s never once been disproven. On the contrary though, it’s been proven to be accurate archeologically, geographically, scientifically, and historically.
Merry Christmas to you as well!
@@E.L.RipleyAtNostromo
I’m well aware of the delusions people believe like what the news told the masses about 911, the CV19 pandemic and the Vaxx just to name a few.
Not sure if you believe they landed on the moon too but they didn’t. Just sayin
Look up Astro Not Buzz Aldrin telling his granddaughter they never went to the moon, when she asked him why they never went back there. It is easy to find on RUclips.
Merry Christmas MD.
Watch the movie
A funny thing happened on the way to the moon.
I’ve researched the lunar landing quite a bit.
Didn’t happen. Jus sayin
It was all played out on a stage and filmed.
I've wondered about the flat earth thing. In the Bible, it says that that God dwells in a place of unapproachable light. That's got to be crazy far from here given we are surrounded by darkness. Now, even from 30,000 feet, when I look out and down upon the earth, it looks flat.
Edited to add: Appearance of based upon perspective. The information translated in our brains into information is basically programming. I've wondered if what I see really is what it looks like our if it's just the way my brain is outputting information. That can descend into a mind bending conversation though and my buddies usually stop talking and look at me funny because if you think about it, everything we experience is output from the brain. Or, maybe it's not. Maybe schizophrenic are somehow hacking into other programing or systems. Merry Christmas...
The bible also says, "As far as the east is from the west He has removed my transgressions..." You can go east forever and never reach west....but if you go north you will switch to going south after you cross the north pole. So clearly whoever wrote that was describing the earth as a globe.
30,000 feet isn't high enough to see the curvature of the Earth. You need to be over 150,000 feet or higher to see it and 200,000+ to see it well.
I'm with family right now, so can't do Scripture, but as I understand it...we cannot travel past the firmament. Unless you wormhole. I will look it up when I get home and get back with you! 🙋♀️♥️
The word Firmament in Genesis' context means an expanse or a large empty space.
Also in the KJB, they are classified as the three heavens which only two are able to be reached in the physical existence.
The sky is the first heaven, outer space is the second heaven and the third heaven (the "heaven" most are familiar with) is where the Lord Jesus Christ sits at the right hand of the Father. The third heaven always was and always will be and was here before Genesis 1 of course.
In the N.T. Paul mentioned being caught up in the spirit into the third heaven. If there's a third heaven, that demands that there's a first and second one and later on in the KJB after Genesis, they're defined as "the stars in heaven" and "the fowls that fly in the open firmament of heaven". That's outer space and the sky, respectively.
The KJB never taught a flat Earth. The people who say it does don't know of the three heavens, they take verses out of context and they take figurative words and verses 100% literal and get into a big confusing mess which leads to them imagining the Earth being flat and there's a dome covering it which isn't true.
Then you have a lot of people who read non-canonical books like Enoch and the Apocrypha for examples and they get even more confused and think planets are luminaries and angels look like a bunch of wheels connected together with eyes all over the sides haha.
The correct thing to do is to stick to the inspired, inerrant and preserved scriptures/words of God and they're found only in the 66 books of the King James Bible.
Merry Christmas. I think we went to the moon but not in 1969. I think it was much latter than that.
Who benefits from this if it is or is not the truth?
You apparently don't know the history of the first moon "landing" it was to beat Russia or at least lead the world into thinking we were more advanced than Russia... As for now it would be a good way to filter off cash into a black budget.
"thou shall not bear false witness"
haha, it is pretty obvious that the group from that swampy town has pretty much broken every commandment for the majority of its existence... "the means justify the ends"
Here mr native american, we care about you, try these free blankets this winter!
If it isn’t true where has all that money gone other than into someone’s pockets?
Black budget...
I think they're talking about regular people going to those places not astronauts
No, they aren't.
What would the benefit be to the government to lie to us about going to the moon?
They had to beat Russia even if they had to fake it ..
Do you recall Nixon talking to the guys on the moon on the green land line phone?😂
😂 all legit 🤣
Vantablack. Makes things invisible. Even airplanes.
BIBLES VERY CLEAR ON THIS, THERE IS A IMPENATRATABLE FIRMAMENT ABOVE, THX,M.D.
That's not what the word means.
I have watched hundereds of hours of moon landing and read alot about NASA Moon Project. We did not go land on the moon. We might have orbited the moon ,but never landed. We did not have to technology to land. Think about it if we could land on the Moon, Why could we not land on Earth instead of crashing down in the sea.
Nope we never went to the moon. Have you seen the avionics on early 70s planes? Even military jets from the late 60s - 70s had crude avionics. But we flew to the moon. Who placed the camera on the moon when they made "man's first step onto it"? Also look into to the Van Allen belt. The radiation they would have been exposed to would have killed them.
Great video and perfect t timing.
Why dosen't Nasa put a camera on the moon looking at earth and charge subscriptions? What a money maker that would be
We all know we never made it to he moon, man is not that smart
My only comment was the actual first person on the surface of the moon the photographer video recorder?
Probably a little grey 👽 lol
MD go over to Starkey Farmstead Sam did a video on it.
Nailed it! The lies go way deeper, keep researching! NASA T- look at anagram!😉 STARGATE series seems to be truth.
Everyone knows they don't have the technology to go to the moon anymore, that is what the video is actually talking about. However, did we ever have it is a different question and not what this video is exposing.
MD nothing surprises me anymore we lied to now why think they were honest then..😊 ..the man said the moon...really makes you think...
I'm no expert either,but I can hear an rocket man said,we need to build something🤷else before they can go to the moon. Maybe their u f o aliens will help them. 🤫 🐿️👍
Cold War Psyop
He's talking about typically people don't leave the atmosphere. Perhaps NASAs plan is to go commercial making space travel open to the public.
That's not what he said.
I’m sorry M.D., I love your channel, but the two statements aren’t mutually exclusive. He’s talking about future endeavors, not negating the past. We’ve CLEARLY been to the moon, with Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17, and 12 men have walked on the moon. They’ve left the aft parts of their LEM’s, AND the rover vehicles, it’s all there and can be seen with a telescope. Again, I love your channel brother, but you’re conflating two different things, and making an incorrect assumption based on one statement that is stating current and future tech, not disregarding past accomplishments. We had a Saturn V booster in the ‘60’s and ‘70’s, then a Space Shuttle after, and don’t have either of those now, so he’s talking about what new tech is being developed.
Thanks for all your content, and Merry Christmas!
So we had the tech... lost it and trying to get it back... cool.
@ Basically that’s it. Thing is, the shuttle was _supposed_to be a more cost efficient way to get us back into space, but it never went past 220 miles or so, and was used mostly to conduct experiments and help build and supply the ISS. Then two of the orbiters blew up, the money ran out I guess, and they retired the shuttle fleet. I was hoping they’d keep it going, but it was older technology. I’m not sure what programs he’s talking about now, but maybe Musk and SpaceX will also have something to get us back to the Moon? As it is, the Chinese are already on the way, which is concerning.
MD i watch the moon landing as a kid my father want me to watch this on the tv, gess what i ask my father i see them landing ,is this the first time, yes, well who on the moon fliming the landing , he trun the channel the same ever time
Nobody has gone, can go to the Moon, it's not a solid object planetoid. Don't assign me homework. Read the Scriptures.