Samyang 35-150mm f2-f2.8 vs Tamron 35-150mm f2-f2.8 comparison

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 июн 2024
  • Support this channel by leaving a donation: www.paypal.me/HannaSaba
    Join my groups and social pages: linktr.ee/hrimages
    Hey everyone here is my comparison between the Samyang 35-150mm f2-f2.8 vs Tamron 35-150mm f2-f2.8 lens.
    Chapters
    00:00 Intro
    00:23 Build Quality
    04:30 Eye-AF
    05:54 Bokeh & minimum focus distance
    08:43 Chromatic Aberration & Lens Flare
    09:36 Sharpness
    14:34 AF (Video)
    15:52 AF (Stills)
    Do check out my affiliate links below by purchasing from there it will help support this channel to continue to create BTS videos and gear reviews.
    Luminar NEO - skylum.evyy.net/c/1426416/142...
    Gear used:
    Samyang 24mm f1.8 - amzn.to/3HFUoW9
    Samyang 135mm f1.8 - amzn.to/3PGl9gm
    Samyang 85mm f1.4 II - amzn.to/3cSxI9N
    Samyang 35mm f1.4 II - amzn.to/3Qr2ZPR
    Sony a7siii - amzn.to/3MIr7vE
    Sony a1 - amzn.to/3sUPgHm
    Samyang 24-70mm f2.8 - amzn.to/3NC3chG
    Sony 24-70mm f2.8 GM II - amzn.to/3YrbOwM
    Sony 135mm f1.8 GM - amzn.to/3NG3Da4
    Sony 50mm f1.2 GM - amzn.to/3NDYuiL
    Sony 24mm f1.4 GM - amzn.to/3nC0PR2
    Sony 35mm f1.4 GM - amzn.to/3ye02uh
    BOYA BY-WM8 PRO-K2 - amzn.to/3tT9EsX
    Asus UX582 - amzn.to/3OepkPB
    AMAZON AFFILIATE with all my gear: www.amazon.com/shop/hannasaba...
    Australia
    Use the code HS10 for 10% discount on Samyang Lenses
    www.maxxum.com.au
    Please Give a thumbs up, share, leave a comment, and subscribe to my channel!
    #sony #tamron35150 #samyang

Комментарии • 56

  • @thb5505
    @thb5505 11 месяцев назад +4

    Excellent video, excellent comparison. Exactly what I was looking for. Thank you and good look for your channel!

    • @HRImages
      @HRImages  11 месяцев назад

      Thank you and you're welcome 😊

  • @jacques424242
    @jacques424242 11 месяцев назад +2

    Thanks for this very informative and practical review. I especially appreciate hearing your findings about flare and AF on moving subjects, as other reviews to date have raised questions about these. One, in particular, reported pretty bad veiling flare with the Samyang pointed at bright light. I'm still looking for a comparison of C-AF and tracking IN LOW LIGHT, as this is where differences are most likely to become apparent. For event shooters, who often work in dim environments, this is important.

    • @HRImages
      @HRImages  11 месяцев назад +2

      Testing both in low light events in C-AF they both perform really well. Kept up with everything during the events

    • @CarlosTucker-sp4bj
      @CarlosTucker-sp4bj 8 месяцев назад +1

      Hello bro i have just started as a wedding photographer i have sony a7 m3 and i have 28-70 f3.5 - 5.6 and now i am a bit confused which lens to buy 35mm/85mm or should i buy tamron 70-180 f2.8 bro can you please suggest??

    • @USGrant21st
      @USGrant21st 6 месяцев назад

      answering your questions, veiling is strong, AF is hit and miss.

  • @pzadach
    @pzadach 10 месяцев назад +10

    These two are very close. One thing he did not mention is the Warranty. Tamron 6 years, Samyang 1 year. Might be important to some people.

    • @jleocarmo
      @jleocarmo 10 месяцев назад +1

      Samyang actually offers a 5-year warranty in Portugal, Spain and Andorra.

    • @XDR2201
      @XDR2201 10 месяцев назад

      In my country, Tamron offers 3 years vs Samyang 2 years warranty.

    • @Czsonbor
      @Czsonbor 10 месяцев назад +1

      In Hungary where i live if you buy as a professional (or a business) you only get 1 year of Tamron warranty but 3 years at Samyang😃 so I bought that one

    • @hari_fyi
      @hari_fyi 6 месяцев назад

      Here in India it's 4 year warranty for Tamron still osm

  • @SilatShooter
    @SilatShooter 11 месяцев назад +4

    I already had/have the Tamron version and it's an amazing lens, except for the size and weight. But price for that unique zoom and fast glass. I have a few Samyang lenses and they're good but their AF is not as good as my others lenses. It's not a big difference, but it's noticeable. So I would likely have gone with the Tamron anyway for a premium zoom as these are.

  • @woogourmetraveler
    @woogourmetraveler 11 месяцев назад +2

    AWESOME SAMYANG!

  • @jleocarmo
    @jleocarmo 10 месяцев назад +1

    Excellent review. I bought the Samyang and I love it. The only thing missing is a lens profile for Lightroom for optical corrections. Do you know if the Tamron lens profile provides good correction results to Samyang photos, given that they are very similar lenses? It would be a very useful piece of information.

    • @HRImages
      @HRImages  10 месяцев назад

      To be honest I haven't tried it

    • @paulofthepeak
      @paulofthepeak 6 месяцев назад +2

      I have tried it and it works pretty well

  • @Wistbacka
    @Wistbacka 10 месяцев назад +4

    I hope either manufacturer now would make a cheaper version. Remove all the fancy buttons, and make it f2.8-4 instead. That would be incredible for hobbyists and beginners.
    That said, as a hobbyist, I'm now waiting for the Samyang to start appearing on the second hand market.

    • @Rxn2016
      @Rxn2016 10 месяцев назад

      There is a tamron 2.8-4, but it's a DSLR lens I believe

    • @polarized8708
      @polarized8708 10 месяцев назад +2

      Buy the Tamron 28-200 2.8-5.6, that should do it for you. It closes very late to F5.6, so at 100mm you are at 4.5 I guess. Its one of thoses lenses I wouldnt sell any time.

  • @USGrant21st
    @USGrant21st 6 месяцев назад +3

    I made a mistake buying Samyang, had to send it back. Nevertheless, there are two things I liked about it. It performed very well at 35mm, very sharp. And bokeh is very smooth. Unfortunately, it goes downhill the longer you zoom. At 150mm it's just soft, even at the center. Flaky AF is not helping either. But what pushed me over the edge is terrible flaring of Samyang. The veiling is so strong at longer focal length it becomes impossible to shoot anywhere where there are strong back lights, even outside the frame.

  • @thomasuriarte3182
    @thomasuriarte3182 Месяц назад

    Is the Tamron naturally brighter or were there variations in the lighting? When you shot the charts the settings were the same but the exposures were different.

  • @richardcarpenter8899
    @richardcarpenter8899 Месяц назад

    Bought the Rokinon as I already had the Lens Station. At $1100 US (on sale) vs $1900 US for the Tamron I couldn't justify the additional $800. I love Tamron lenses and own quite a few of them but the one thing I like better on the Rokinon is that it has par focus meaning it stays in focus throughout the zoom once it has been locked on a subject. The Samyang/Rokinon was simply the better value. I find the AF to be snappy and accurate.

  • @mirrorlessny
    @mirrorlessny 10 месяцев назад

    good comparison thx, I felt mic was bit too close to mouth

    • @HRImages
      @HRImages  10 месяцев назад +1

      Thank you, yeah got to lower the mic 😅

  • @eavilev
    @eavilev 7 месяцев назад +1

    I found this video just as B&H has the Samyang on sale for $1K. Too good a deal to pass. THANKS

    • @hari_fyi
      @hari_fyi 6 месяцев назад

      Whoa, lucky u. How's it so far? Does barrel suck in dust?

  • @jamesbarron5590
    @jamesbarron5590 11 месяцев назад +2

    I have the Tamron and have enjoyed it for 8 months. It’s great to have different options for this uncommon focal range now.
    I have no regrets and if I had to choose again I would still go with the Tamron. The Tamron is heavy already so I would not want to add any weight to it. I currently use it on an a7iv and I use the peak design clutch grip. That really helps distribute the weight. I initially had it on an a7c with the small rig cage with the grip and that worked well also. Thanks for the comparison. Although I already own the Tamron, I like to watch videos to see what else I can learn about it.

    • @ASouthernBoyCanSurvive
      @ASouthernBoyCanSurvive 10 месяцев назад

      Copy and post this comment to all videos about these lenses?

    • @jamesbarron5590
      @jamesbarron5590 10 месяцев назад

      @@ASouthernBoyCanSurvive Copy and paste this same reply?

    • @CarlosTucker-sp4bj
      @CarlosTucker-sp4bj 8 месяцев назад

      Hello bro i have just started as a wedding photographer i have sony a7 m3 and i have 28-70 f3.5 - 5.6 and now i am a bit confused which lens to buy 35mm/85mm or should i buy tamron 70-180 f2.8 bro can you please suggest??

    • @jamesbarron5590
      @jamesbarron5590 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@CarlosTucker-sp4bj I would recommend the Tamron 35-150 f/2-2.8. If you add up the price of the Tamron 70-180, plus a 35 and 85 f/1.8 then you have more than covered the price of the 35-150 and do not have to keep changing lenses. Although the 85mm f/1.8 lens is amazing.
      Another option would be to go with a Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8. This lens is $899 new and $600 ish used. That is a popular wedding lens. Well, 24-70mm is but this is close.
      But the best thing to do is to rent some lenses to see what focal lengths you will actually be needing. This will save you some money because buying the wrong lens will cost you because resale kind of sucks. Buy used if possible so if you need to sell, it won’t hurt as much financially. Hope this helps. Good luck!

    • @CarlosTucker-sp4bj
      @CarlosTucker-sp4bj 8 месяцев назад

      @@jamesbarron5590 thanks bro 😊

  • @julesfisher3551
    @julesfisher3551 10 месяцев назад

    What is the difference in the optical structure between the two lenses. As the review makes me think that the Samyang is a Tamron clone.

    • @HRImages
      @HRImages  10 месяцев назад

      Tamron feels a bit more plastic than samyang

    • @USGrant21st
      @USGrant21st 6 месяцев назад

      Samyang is probably as usual is using a lower grade glass in their lenses. You get what you pay for.

    • @flol3266
      @flol3266 5 месяцев назад

      @@USGrant21st that is simply not true. They have excellent glass. For example the 50mm 1.4 mark2 (and only mark2) is an absolute killer. And all their newer mark2 lenses with the new design of the hidden red ring have brutally good glass in it.

  • @PhinioxGlade
    @PhinioxGlade 9 месяцев назад

    I’m not shocked that a photography lens of this range is t parfocal

  • @nixone1941
    @nixone1941 11 месяцев назад +3

    I bought the samyang. Yeah i agree with the hood blocking the lock switch. nevertheless, i love the lens. Very sharp

    • @HRImages
      @HRImages  11 месяцев назад

      Wished they did better with tge location of the switch but it is not a major issue for me

    • @nixone1941
      @nixone1941 11 месяцев назад

      @@HRImages I don't mind it either. Performance is more important

  • @losyash5054
    @losyash5054 11 месяцев назад +3

    Thx Buy tamron 😇

  • @mshea5906
    @mshea5906 6 месяцев назад

    So....did Samyang send all the YT influencers excellent copies of their 35-150mm? I've been through 2 copies and both missed eye autofocus a lot. About 6 out of 10 were soft on moving subjects. I would NOT buy a used version of this lens. I sent both of mine back. Good luck.

    • @HRImages
      @HRImages  5 месяцев назад

      I brought mine

  • @pablomurillodotcom
    @pablomurillodotcom 10 месяцев назад

    Hi! Thanks a lot for the very useful review 😊, just a quick question, did you update the firmware in the Samyang lens? I'm asking cuz their latest firmware addresses the issue you seem to be having with the focusing when zooming 🤔

    • @HRImages
      @HRImages  10 месяцев назад +1

      Yes I did

  • @umitbuyukoz
    @umitbuyukoz 2 месяца назад

    If there is not much difference between them, my plan to buy samyang. I will only use it for video.

  • @polarized8708
    @polarized8708 10 месяцев назад

    I still wonder, how Samyang managed to build this lens as their second zoom lens. From many aspects, they seem to be identically (size, apterture values at focal lengh = 35 f2, 50 f2.2, 75 2.5) and just small things like the housing, buttons and their placement differentiat them.
    So their are some reviews with firmware v1 from Samyang, that they their eye AF is inconcistent, their image quality is not as good as tamron and video AF is unuseable and lens creep is their.
    I got the Samyang two days ago and weather wasnt great, but without having the Tamron to comparision, the Samyang seem to be a really good bang for the bucks. AF was on point every shot, it doenst feel premium as Sony and Sigma, but good enough and what you see through your viewfinder will immediatly amaze you. Its a bokeh zoom master at every range, something what a 24-70 couldnt deliver and you dont have to change to a tele every time. Beside of that, it should work great for sport because it should replace a 70-200 also. Not tested that yet.

    • @yormaalva
      @yormaalva 9 месяцев назад

      Hola como te ha hido con el AF, Tiene algun problema? saludos..

    • @polarized8708
      @polarized8708 9 месяцев назад

      @@yormaalva Todavía no he fotografiado ningún deporte con él. pero era lo suficientemente bueno para todo lo demás. Lo probaré en una boda la próxima semana.

    • @yormaalva
      @yormaalva 9 месяцев назад

      Me dejas saber cómo te va! Gracias

  • @LukeAdams-bw6tn
    @LukeAdams-bw6tn 9 месяцев назад

    If you couldn’t find lens flare in your tests, you weren’t trying hard enough. Both these lenses have atrocious lens flare.

    • @HRImages
      @HRImages  9 месяцев назад

      I shoot a lot against the sun haven't found any bad flaring. The 35mm f1.4 II samyang gets a lot of flaring I

    • @LukeAdams-bw6tn
      @LukeAdams-bw6tn 9 месяцев назад

      Try watching the DPReview on the Tamron lens.@@HRImages

    • @USGrant21st
      @USGrant21st 6 месяцев назад

      I don't have Tamron 35-150, but I did have Samyang. It's has atrocious veiling glare. It's only good at 35mm. If you are shooting indoors and there is a window on the side, even outside the frame, the veiling will be very noticeable.