Hey Mark, thanks so much for watching! Both great cameras, indeed! And I agree 100% that M4/3 is the only way to go for wildlife/telephoto shooting! I'm planning on making a video on this very topic sometime soon, so be on the lookout. Thanks again for watching! :)
Finally youtube bring me to this awesome channel, thanks for your video even it's 2 years ago, your information is really helpful for me, as a M43 GX9 user, to think about adopting Lumix S camera or not in the coming future ;)
You are so good at reviews! It's always heart warming to find a person that loves what they do, shares their experience with others and does so in such a splendid fashion. Loved all the pictures, but the one at 6:43 really showed your joy. Nice smile! I look forward to more content. Oh, really like your honesty about the screen. Why on earth would they not use a fully articulating screen is beyond me. Best wishes.
Hey, Dale thanks so much for watching and your kind remarks. As for the screen, I personally think they left it out because at the time of launch, no other FF mirrorless camera had such a feature and they wanted to appeal to "professionals". I am not sure why so many photographers bash this kind of screen, it's absolutely the most useful and flexible for so many different shooting scenarios. But I digress. Anyway, I'm VERY excited about the S5! An articulating screen AND it's much lighter and smaller. Definitely checks all the boxes. Can't wait for mine to arrive :)
Thank you for this. As a GH5 filmmaker and Olympus still shooter, I am really looking forward to shooting with the S1! BTW, the tilting screen is more appealing to me than the video centric "floppy" screen...
Hey thanks so much for watching! The S1 is an amazing camera! If you prefer a tilting screen, I’m sure you will just love it. I bought the S5 myself, which I love because it’s lighter/smaller and has the flip screen I prefer. There are days when I miss the incredible EVF on the S1 though. Thanks again for watching and enjoy your new S1!
Hey, I’m using an older version of the Voigtlander 15mmm Heliar Aspherical Wide angle lens. The one I have usually sells on eBay around $400-$500-ish. I feature that lens in another video, if you want to see more image samples and get a better look at it (skip to about 1:40): ruclips.net/video/wsyfyukFCQ0/видео.html It’s a Leica M-mount lens, so I use an LM to LL adapter, like this one: amzn.to/3c7B2sG Here's a link to a newer version of the 15mm Voigtlander: amzn.to/32ASfXi I'm sure the newer one is better, but I really like the older one I have. Its super-small and lightweight, it's really sharp, and it creates gorgeous starbursts when you stop it down a bit. It has some heavy vignetting due to the small size of the glass, but I don't mind it, I usually will add some vignetting in post anyway. Thanks so much for watching!
Funny, I have an S5 but I just bought a 2nd hand S1 mainly for this tilting screen and the better viewfinder. I also like manual focus lenses and plan to use old Canon EF L glass because they still have a 'real' focus ring for good control, not this focus by wire mistake.
Hey, thanks for watching! I do miss that gorgeous EVF on the S1, that is for sure. If I were solely FF, pairing these 2 cameras is a totally awesome setup, getting the benefits of both (I personally tend to lean more M4/3 for about 80% of my shooting). I did speak to someone at LUMIX though who told me they had no choice with the S5 in regards to the EVF, due to it's smaller more compact size and the distribution of heat with all that is packed into the camera (I think this is also the reason for the mini HDMI, but I may be wrong about that). Anyway, they are 2 very similar cameras with unique differences that meet very specific needs. I really appreciate that we have the option to choose :) I hope you enjoy them both, happy shooting!
Hey Andreas, thanks so much for watching! I am in love with my LUMIX gear as well, so we share that passion. Although I don't own one (I opted for the lighter/smaller G85) the G9 is an amazing camera! The S5 is also outstanding, I ordered mine right away upon it's release and I freaking love it, and highly recommend it. Here's a link to check out my "unboxing" video: ruclips.net/video/K3rkHnSbOHI/видео.html I personally use both systems and I don't have plans to abandon M4/3 for the L-mount any time soon. They each serve different purposes for me, and there are many times when M4/3 is a better option. I love the smaller, lighter overall system. Having lenses that weigh next to nothing makes a big difference in how much I can carry around or travel with. I also have smaller M4/3 cameras I prefer over something as large as the G9, but the S5 could easily add up (in cost and weight) with the larger L-mount lenses. Of course, it may not be cost efficient to keep both, if you are looking to sell in order to upgrade to the S5. I guess I just love my M4/3 gear, and I have so many lenses and focal lengths that my options are endless. I also use passive, inexpensive adapters to share vintage lenses across both systems. This doubles your focal length on M/3, so you can carry 3 primes with both cameras and get 6 different focal lengths due to the crop factor. I talk about this in my "vintage lenses" video if you haven't seen that yet, check it out. Here is the link (jump to about 4:30): ruclips.net/video/wsyfyukFCQ0/видео.html Thanks again for watching and whatever you decide, I am sure you will be happy with your LUMIX gear either way. :)
@@graphiknation thank you very much for your time to write to me. I appreciate. I d like to know your fb or Instagram to follow you and... if you want, to follow me as well. I am amateur enthusiast about photography and I d love to learn from experienced people.
@@MrJapanforce hey Andreas, thanks I am happy to offer my insights to a fellow LUMIX enthusiast! You can find me as graphiknation on Instagram and Facebook but I rarely post on FB these days so IG is the better place to find me. ☺️
hey thanks so much for watching! They are both fantastic cameras! I personally chose the S5 for it's smaller/lighter size and the articulating screen was a deal breaker for me with the S1. That EVF though is pretty spectacular. I can't say I really miss it on the S5 because the EVF is sufficient, and I love the handling of that camera so much it doesn't ever occur to me when I am out shooting that I don't have the higher quality EVF of the S1. I just remember it as very impressive and one of my favorite features of the S1. I don't think you can go wrong either way, both are spectacular and a joy to use.
For a few years I became obsessed with camera weight. After carrying around a Canon 5D3 with a heavy prime or zoom lens for years, I was keen to reduce weight. So I wouldn't even look at any camera/lens ensemble that weighed over about 800g. That meant shooting APS-C Fuji and Sony cameras. A few months ago my friendly camera store took in a used Lumix S1 and lent it to me to try without charge. At first it felt like a huge lead weight in my hands but I decided to persevere. After a week I was hooked and there was no way I was giving that camera back. This is the most under-rated camera on the market in my opinion. It has many faults its true; poor autofocus compared to other cameras in its class, plus a limited choice of huge, heavy, expensive lenses. BUT - as you mention in your video, it feels so good in the hands. Everything fits to make it a wonderful camera to hold and use. The dynamic range is excellent. I have never owned a digital FF camera that holds highlights as well as this. Leica and Voigtlander M mount lenses perform better with this camera (with an adapter) than they do on the Sony A7's, especially with wider lenses (less vignetting). Two things you didn't mention/emphasise enough: The image stabilisation system has to be the best in any FF camera system (albeit I haven't tested them all of course). I can hand hold this camera at 1/8th second and get very sharp results if I am well braced. Second: That shutter - its character and its sound are like a lullaby to a baby for me. Sometimes I switch the camera on and make an exposure with the lens cap on, just to appreciate the engineering that must have gone into it. Panasonic put a lot into this camera. I hope they continue with the system. Its weight is a burden for sure, but for me there is no question that it is worth carrying.
Hey, thanks so much for watching! I agree with all the points you have made, and the S1 is no doubt an exceptional camera! I never doubted it would be, as I have been a die-hard LUMIX enthusiast for years, but I could never have predicted that I would so quickly forgive it’s large size and weight. As a M4/3 shooter, I highly value portability and the S1 is quite a jump for me on that count alone. I personally don’t prioritize autofocus as much as some other features, so shooting with my smaller vintage Leica lenses made using the S1 a much more pleasurable experience and I found no compromise at all in terms of image quality. I also have to say the dynamic range is the most impressive I have ever seen, but I also was not surprised by this at all, as I have always loved the colors and image quality of my LUMIX cameras, it met all my expectations. One thing to point out on stabilization, which yes it is fantastic on the S1, but I guess it didn’t strike me as unique since I can easily shoot handheld on most of my M4/3 cameras at shutters of 1/4, 1/6, 1/8, etc and have done so for years now. I don’t own any other modern FF cameras to compare it to, so my benchmark for comparison is my M4/3 system. The S1 for me was like my favorite LUMIX camera, with super powers LOL. I am not sure what your relationship is to your local camera store, but if they will lend you gear for experimentation, I would highly recommend asking to test drive the LUMIX G9 (for which the S1 was modeled after). If you can also get your hands on the Leica 12-60 f/2.8-4.0 and the Leica 50-200 f2.8-4.0 and either 42.5 lens (the f1.2 or f/1.7), you will likely never go back to a larger system. It’s just incredible the quality you can get in such a smaller and lighter system, and LUMIX cameras are extremely user friendly and hard to beat on ergonomics (IMO, of course). I am so glad you found your way to the S1, and I am sure you will enjoy it for years to come. It was a sad day indeed when I had to send it back to LUMIX, but it gave me such a good experience shooting with the larger body, that it helped me figure out which M/4/3 cameras to focus on in the future. If they make a smaller body S series camera, I’m sure I will be the first in line to buy it. The lenses are insanely large and expensive, but I have never used a kit lens that was as impressive as the one that comes with the S1, so right out of the box, you are at a much better starting point than most. And if you have vintage or other lenses you can adapt, that’s a good place to start building from. Thanks again for watching, and for your thoughtful in-depth remarks.
I shoot M43 and I might go full frame at some point but I'm not going to buy a full set again like I did with M43. I shoot weddings and I have a lot of gear. It's too much of a headache when I have a setup that does the job and it's a lot of money buying into a new setup. But I might buy a full frame camera maybe one or two lens for a look I want but not a full setup. There was a time when I was thinking of selling my M43 gear but DXO PhotoLab and DXO PureRaw with Deep Prime fixed the noise issue and Luminar I can use for extra bokeh when I need it.
Hey, thanks so much for watching! I agree with you, there is no reason to leave M4/3 for a larger system. Everything just gets larger, heavier and more expensive. Not nearly enough credit is given to the M4/3 system for all of it's wonderful advantages in size, weight, cost, and even features like DOF and low light have their advantages over larger sensors. It's important to note that when speaking on noise and ISO, we make sure to compare accurate equivalents considering the crop factor conversion which on M4/3 is x/÷ (4) or (so 1600 ISO on M4/3 = 6400 ISO on FF). If you're using wide aperture primes on M4/3 (1.2/1.4/1.8/2.0/2.8) it's my long held opinion that you are actually getting the best possible combination of specs for the best end results. No one ever talks about how deeper depth of field can be a benefit, which in most cases shooting wide open at 1.4 or 1.8, etc on FF gives such a shallow depth of field that you would need to stop down to at least 2.8 or even 4.0 to get enough of your subject in sharp enough focus to be considered a "good" image (especially in portraits, product or macro photography. On m4/3 you can keep that aperture wide open at 1.4 (or whatever) and get all the benefits of the maximum amount of light, get enough of your subject in sharp focus AND also achieve pleasing bokeh and background blur. M4/3 is still my go-to and (IMO) the most flexible system you can buy into. I love my S5, but I still walk out the door 80% of the time with a M4/3 camera in hand. Thanks again for watching, happy shooting and I hope you enjoy your M4/3 or whatever system you end up choosing. If you love it, that's all that matters. :)
Great review with excellent shots and I like how you explain your work and put things in context. So, liked and subbed. I have both, S1 and G9, but tbh I have not used the G9 much for fotos since the S1 arrived. Sensor size matters, especially at low light. But what I much like is that the G9 received a massive video update, so it now does 10bit 422 internally which makes it a very powerful hybrid camera.
hey thanks so much for your comment and for the follow :) I agree, the resolution on the S1 is stunning! If they would make a version with an articulating screen, I would not hesitate to buy it. I'm still looking at the G9, and I may get it. But I currently have too many M4/3 cameras, so I might have to sell something to justify adding another one to my collection. LOL
I recently upgraded from M4/3 to a Sony A7ii. As a sometimes, street photographer who shoots with vintage/classic lenses I find the full frame captures more of the character of these old lenses because it's not cropping out 75% of the image circle where most of that character lives. I still like my micro 4/3s for their portability so I will keep them for the time being. If I were traveling, I might be tempted to take a small kit consisting of an M4/3 body and a handful of lenses but it would depend on where I was traveling to.
Hey, thanks so much for watching! Happy to hear you're hanging on to the M4/3 gear, at least for now. I personally love using my FF S5 in combination with my M4/3 and my collection of vintage lenses to achieve different looks with each format. You can double your lens options using adapters and carry less gear around, and I really like that. :) I don't shoot Sony, but I hope you are enjoying the A7ii. Thanks again for watching and engaging.
Great video. The S1 looks amazing but too big for me. I do like the tilting screen because you can tilt it for portrait shots, I wish I had that on my little GX80 :-)
Hey, Michael, thanks so much for watching and for your comment. It’s a big camera for sure, but the image quality is insane! I would not drop my M4/3 system for it, because portability is just such a high priority for me, but I would absolutely love to have the S1 as a compliment. If you have any interest, check out my video on using vintage lenses with the S1. If you have a collection of other lenses that can be adapted for it, the S1 becomes a lot more manageable with smaller, vintage glass - and you can share the same lenses across you M/43 cameras as well, and get completely different focal length! It’s a pretty great marriage of old school & new tech, if you can live without autofocus of course. LOL Thanks again for watching! Here's that link to the vintage lenses video if you want to check it out: ruclips.net/video/wsyfyukFCQ0/видео.html
Hey thanks so much! And congrats on the upgrade to the G9, it's an amazing camera! The FF is pretty sweet, but the G series cameras are still pretty impressive too. Thanks for watch & commenting! :)
@@adamlord Sure thing, I am working on a new video all about the vintage lenses I used. :) the 15mm is a vintage Voigtlander M mount lens. They no longer make the exact version that I have, but there is a newer one (same specs, just looks a little different). Here is a link to the current version on Amazon: amzn.to/32ASfXi
The G9 won’t disappoint if you already have the m43 lens collection or try the S5 if you’re a hybrid shooter, great in low light with the FF 24 sensor and both have the flippy screen you crave for! Great production btw, thanks. 📸👍👏
Hey thanks so much for watching! I actually went with a used G85 that I picked up locally for a good price, and held out for the S5! I pre-ordered it on day 1, without hesitation. You can check out my unboxing video here: ruclips.net/video/K3rkHnSbOHI/видео.html I know the G9 is such a fantastic camera, but I really prefer a smaller, lighter body so the G85 suits me just fine for M4/3. It's also a great companion to the S5. I would take one of every model if I could, lol. Thanks again for watching and engaging, happy shooting!
@@graphiknation Nice catch I’ll check out the link, not too dissimilar ergo’s to the G9, love my LUMIX cameras and the M43 system. I found a great used GX9 with a oly 17 1.8 on eBay, great combo, like new and I use the touch screen shutter with discreet shooting from the hip, So happy with it for the street, not a flippy! But I did mount a little action cam on the hot the other day, worked well, just starting think about video myself. Keep up the great work, got my sub and support.
@@guidetheride2103 that's awesome, I love the GX9, it's such a great little camera! perfect for street and travel, you will get a lot of use out of it. I have a GF8 and a GM1, and they are both extremely small and light, very discreet. if I didn't already have those 2older cameras, I would have bought a GX9 myself by now. thanks so much for the sub and support! :)
Hi Pankaj, thanks so much for watching and your question regarding autofocus. I personally did not have any problems at all with the autofocus system. Bear in mind LUMIX cameras have been my primary system for almost 10 years now, so using the contrast-based AF was a seamless experience for me, and it worked perfectly and as expected. I should also point out that I don’t shoot a lot of sports or fast action, so I don’t prioritize the auto focus feature as much as some other features. I also prefer using my vintage primes on the S1 due to it’s large size and weight anyway, so auto focus just doesn’t matter that much to me. Thanks again for watching and for your question, I hope my answer is helpful.
Hello Love your review. Thank you. I saw you purchased the s5 I am using omd m1 for years and is looking for full frame to shoot with vantage lens. What would be your advise s1 or s5 ? Thank you !
Hey thanks so much for watching! As much as I loved the S1, it was a bit too large and cumbersome for me personally, and as I mentioned in the video, the titling screen was a deal breaker for me. Both the S1 and S5 have the same sensor, so image quality is exactly the same (at least for photography). I would say if you care about the articulating screen, the S5 is a better option. If you don't care about that, and the extra weight in hand doesn't bother you, but you really like shooting thru the EVF (rather than the LCD screen), the resolution and quality of the EVF on the S1 is superb. It's really going to come down to your own personal preferences. I love the S5 and I am 100% happy with that beautiful camera. Best of luck, and happy shooting! Here are my Amazon Affiliate links to both cameras if you want to compare models and read reviews: LUMIX S5: amzn.to/3xXpZiY LUMIX S1: amzn.to/3xwxADE One thing you might consider is which lens you might want to get. You can of course buy either camera “body only” but it’s a better deal to get with the kit lens. The 20-60mm 3.5-5.6 that comes with the S5 is light weight and compact, but the 24-104mm f/4 that comes with the S1 is a much better lens in my opinion. It’s of course heavier and larger as well, but the constant aperture, extended reach, stabilization and macro abilities of the 24-105 is far better than the 20-60.
@@lukmie2769 I hear you, and that is certainly a valid and widely shared opinion of the AF system. I guess it depends what your shooting? I tend to shoot AF-S or manual focus most of the time, so the AF wasn't a big point of contention for me. Perhaps if I shot more fast action and sports it would be, but I rarely switch into AF-C so I never had a problem. Thanks again for your thoughts! :)
Nice images and review, but misnamed - this isn’t street photography as much as it is photographs/footage of streetscapes. Where are the people? I’m tilting toward this system, but needed to know if the AF is responsive enough to catch people interacting on the streets.
Hey Fred, thanks so much for watching and for your comment, which is a great point and I hear you. While I do take a lot of street photos that include people in the frame, I personally don't feel comfortable sharing those images of unknown strangers on such a public, global platform as RUclips. It's just my personal moral/ethical standard, regardless of how the law applies to photographing people in public spaces. As for the autofocus on the S1, I had no trouble with it at all, and it performs as well as or better than any other LUMIX camera that I have ever owned. In all honesty, I don't prioritize auto focus as high as some other features, and I tend to use a lot of vintage and manual focus lenses anyway, so it just isn't something I think about very often. In traditional street photography, I personally follow the Henry-Cartier Bresson method of "the decisive moment" where capturing those fleeting scenes relies most heavily on the instincts, intuition and skill of the photographer, and is less dependent on advanced tech and auto settings in-camera. I think the AF on the S1 is more than capable of handling most shooting scenarios, but I don't shoot a lot of sports or fast action, so I did not put it to a rigorous test in that regard. I hope this answers your question, and thanks again for your comment and for watching.
@@graphiknation Hey, mate- thanks heaps for this detailed, thoughtful reply- much obliged! Appreciate your explanation and personal ethics too. I'm not so shy about posting street pics, but I'm definitely no ambush photog like Bruce Gilden. I'm currently in the Fuji 'eco-system' (god I hate that corporate speak). I've been a fuji fanboy for many years, but really want another system for better low light ISO performance and a little more IQ in the studio. I like that the S1 is a serious piece of engineering, whereas the Sonys have cut corners on screen, EVF and general build quality. I live in Saigon and when it rains here, it's serious. I like that the Lumix is genuinely weather sealed. I am yet to get my hands on the S1, so I'm looking forward to doing so, maybe tomorrow. Thanks again for the reply.
@@fredaberyEPP Hey Fred, you're welcome :) I don't have experience with Fuji, but I have read and heard great things about them. I would love to try a Fuji sometime, they have a very nostalgic, vintage appeal that I really like. I don't love Sony myself either. While they do some things well, my biggest disappointment in them is their color profiles look horrible in comparison to my other cameras (I have LUMIX, Olympus, Leica & Pentax cameras). It sounds like the S1 would be a very good fit in many ways for your needs regarding ISO, IQ and weather sealing, and I can add just overall design, build and ergonomics, it's just an outstanding and beautifully designed camera. I think the AF is something they get a lot of harsh criticism for, but I have never had any problems with my LUMIX cameras. If you can try one in-store somewhere, that would be ideal. I have also rented gear that I have been on the fence about buying, just to make sure it's a good fit for my needs. You spend a little more that way, but it's a big investment, so I like to have that peace of mind. On the other hand, the S1 is such a high quality product, even if you decide it's not meeting your expectations, I can't imagine you would have a hard time selling it for a fair price. Best of luck, and thanks again for watching!
Thanks for the vidéo. I Made the step few weeks ago to sell one of the best DSLR (Nikon D850) to switch to this hybrid full frame. The purpose for me was to mount my M Lenses and travel Light, use the focus assistance (peaking and zoom) and the wonderfull EVF. It’s a pleasure to use but I think the best for M Lenses is M bodies in terms of global expérience. The kit lens is impressive and moreover it does kind of macro. The 50mm S Pro 1.4 is the best AF 50mm I ever used.
Hey, thanks for your comment, and for watching! I too agree, native lenses are best suited to their respective native mount cameras, and the lenses for the S1 are very impressive. I just like having an option to downsize for travel and street, and still be able to use the S1 with all of it’s powerful capabilities and modern tech. The 50mm S Pro lens for me was a hard sell, due to it’s mammoth size and weight. I really struggled every time I took it out to shoot, and as high quality as it may be, I didn’t enjoy it as much as the smaller lenses. I am of course a huge fan and supporter of the micro four thirds system, so I have that inherent bias regarding size and portability. :)
Very beautiful video, images and narrative, truly professional.. Please do more things like this on lens review, and your experiences on using adapted lens..
Hey Thanks so much! Working on a video for adapted vintage lenses to the S1 body now, actually! Hope to get it uploaded soon, thanks so much for watching and for your feedback, it helps a lot! :)
Hey, I use mostly Haoge + Beschoi brand passive adapters for my vintage lenses. What lenses are you trying to adapt? Sadly M4/3 are too small, but if you have other APS-C, FF or older film lenses, you should be able to find an adapter to use them on the S1.
Always great to see another Atlanta based Photographer putting out great content...I was really interested in the S1/S1R when they dropped but once I got my big mitts on a body, it was too small :-( Why must I have the hands of a Sasquatch?!?
Hey, thanks! It's always great to connect with a local, I hope you can make it to a meetup sometime! Also, that's the first I have heard anyone say the S1 is not big enough. LOL How long did you spend with it? I'm just curious because my initial impression was that it was way too large and too heavy, but I got used to it within about the first week or maybe 2? Anyway, I use really small M4/3 cameras most of the time, and having the S1 was a stark contrast to my normal set up, but I somehow adapted to the dramatic change in a short time. It even made me rethink my entire, years-long resistance to the larger G series camera bodies, and seriously consider getting a G9 or GH5. Thanks for watching, and I hope to see you out on the street in ATL! :)
Excellent images and excellent video I've been looking at what I'm gonna use as a sucking camera to my AGU X180 in my document Terry video production kit and I'm basically looking at the GH5S on the shore and this S1 is really pricey but I'm looking at it just the same...
Hey Thanks so much! That's a hard choice to make, indeed! Do you have lenses for either system? They are both excellent, which I am sure you know. The G series for video is hard to beat right now, since the lenses available are vast and plenty, and of course m4/3, while still not cheap, is more affordable than the FF. Either way, you can't really go wrong with anything from Panasonic for video. :)
@@graphiknation I do not have any native Panasonic or lumex's lenses what I do have is on the old nikon lenses for the FM35 millimeter DSLR and FI to and I have a single lens for my Canon 70 which is A28135R rendering lens so when I buy a when I'm thinking is as an G5 mouse when I buy RGH5 us when I buy that my main goal is 3 fold 1 on camer that will be useful on a gimbal and a glide Cam type of stabilizer and to low light and 3 it will be a camera that I can use to hike and keep on my motorcycle with me I bought the AGU X180 for reasons that were one it's an integrated lands and it covers a wide range and is actually a very good camera number 2 it all M also has dual XLR inputs and several modes on the inputs and it also does a variety of formats to include 4K full size the problem with the that particular 4K recording is is that it's 8 bit instead attend it however I can get around the 8 bit problem by using and at most ninja 5 external monitor with an H DMI cable because that monitor does record 4K and I42 to 10 bed is A4210V or 40010 dead either way it records 4K and 10 bit so I can use that as a work around in then marry the 2 together or I can just shoot with AGH5 us in 10 bit and then down reza but that's what I'm looking at I was just looking at the the a** 1 at you as showing us their and determining whether I really want to get that and use that to as a second camera but I think I'm going to stick with a with AGH5 us just because of its size in it's still close enough to the to the M AGU X180 that of a be extremely useful in what I'm trying to do and I apologize for any translation errors here I'm driving and talking into my phone
05:42 Oh God not you as well. I would have thought that you as a street photographer would realise that the side hinged selfie screen is a disaster for street. Why oh why, seriously?
Hey Chloe thanks for watching and sharing your thoughts. I respect your opinion however I disagree. I will never understand why so many people think a fully articulating screen that enables shooting and framing from literally any position is good for nothing but "selfies"? But nonetheless, we are all entitled to our preferences. Potato/tomato right?
Hey, thanks so much for watching and for your question. It’s a hard one to answer without knowing more about what you want to shoot, what focal lengths you like, if you need a wide aperture, etc…. so many variables to consider. I did make another video however on my experience using some of my vintage lenses on the S1 if you want to check that out, here is that link.: ruclips.net/video/wsyfyukFCQ0/видео.html In that video, I talk about a handful of lens options I used, and there are some links included to some pretty cool primes that you can look into. The good news is the S1 comes with an outstanding kit lens, and it is very easy to adapt to most any lens mount with the correct adapter. So you may already own something you can simply pick up an adapter for. I hope this helps at least a little. Thanks again for watching and I hope you find the right lens that fits your needs and your budget. :)
Hey thnx for your Quick anser. I shoot sport landscape. Vacation etc. I have de 24-105 f4 i would like a wider lens. One that would be great to take to the Woods as 1 lens. And a longer one. I was tinking about the 100-400 sigma. Any of those vintage lenses that can auto focus?
@@luukkleinsman4522 Yeah, sports is tough, you need a big ole lens for that, and they are typically heavy and expensive. LOL The L mount lenses by Sigma are probably your best bet, as they are not as expensive as the Leica & LUMIX lenses, but still not cheap. You won't get autofocus with any vintage lens, but you can find newer lenses with auto focus features, and possibly get an active adapter that enables the autofocus to work on the S1. I am not sure how "budget friendly" that would be, or how well the autofocus would perform? You might want to check out Photo Joseph's video on adapting lenses to the S1 too, he talks about a lot of different options. Here is that link: ruclips.net/video/DFpgJ-_U3Ro/видео.html
I use the S1 for wedding photography and I love the native lenses. However, I’d love to get some smaller MF lenses to mount on it. I’d love to see a video on your adapter and what lenses you are using.
Hey thanks so much for your comment! The native lenses are indeed superb, but do love the smaller prime options for those times when you just want to lighten your load. I am actually working on a video on this very subject, so hopefully I will have that completed & uploaded soon. :) In the meantime, I can tell you I mostly used M mount Leica & Voigtlander lenses (older/vintage versions), with an inexpensive adapter I picked up on Amazon. I also used my Minolta Rokkor-X, same inexpressive adapter via Amazon, which wasn't hard to find. I have a ton of Pentax lenses, but I wasn't able to find an adapter for Pentax-K to L. So, if you have any lenses from another system you might want to to try using, I would search for an L mount adapter for that particular lens mount, and see if there is something available. I paid around $20 I think for the adapters I found on Amazon, and they were Beschoi & Fotasy brands.
@@graphiknation Cool. Yeah, I'm interested in getting some Voigtlander M mount lenses. I'm not that versed in manual focus but it seems very easy on the S1. I use focus peaking even in AF and of course the EVF is so easy to see. I shoot weddings so only occasionally use MF (ring shots, etc.), but thought it would be nice for engagement shoots for a different look with these Voigtlanders and whatever else i might want to add. Thanks for the reply!
@@stevevansak7324 Hey Steve, new video on vintage lenses is finally up, if you want to check it out. I hope you find a nice Voigtlander for your weddings! Here's the link: ruclips.net/video/wsyfyukFCQ0/видео.html
Good review 👍🏻, nice pace and some great sample videos and photos. Hopefully you can get your hands on a G9. I’d be interested in your comparison G9 vs S1. I love my G9 but haven’t had a chance to try the S1 yet. Subscribed.
Hey thanks Rufus, I would love to compare the G9 to the S1, that would be a fun test! I don't know if you ever considered it, but you can always rent the S1 for a week just to give it a try. I love lensrentals.com because they carry M4/3, and they have an option to buy to if you like the gear, which is awesome. Thanks so much for watching and subscribing! :)
I can understand that perspective for sure, they are expensive. I am not fully up to speed on the entire landscape of full frame lenses across competing brands, but I expect they are on-par with the pricing of similar quality optics in that category. However, you can always use an L-mount adapter to pair other lenses with the S1! I really loved using some of my vintage lenses with the S1, and I got very good results. Check out my latest video on adapting vintage primes for the S1 if you’re interested, here's a link: ruclips.net/video/wsyfyukFCQ0/видео.html Thanks for watching, and your comments. :)
You know, I really want to like the S1, but the main roadblock for me is the size and weight. I went to m43 and Leica M because I was sick of the size and weight of my Canon 5D Mark II. The S1 just takes me back to Canon and worse.
I hear you, and I know the feeling. I left a Nikon system for M4/3 in 2011 for the same reason! I will never let go of my M4/3 gear, I love it too much, and I'm still using cameras made by LUMIX & Olympus from 2012-2015 (which speaks to their quality). I am interested in seeing the new, smaller body S camera that they have recently talked about in DPReview. That would peak my interest, and I would love to have it as a compliment (not a replacement) to my M4/3 gear. I absolutely loved shooting with the S1 and my M mount vintage lenses! It was great fun, and so much lighter and better suited to travel & street photography. I can't deny the quality and resolution of that FF sensor paired with the charm and compact size of vintage glass felt like I was getting best of both worlds. It was truly an awesome combination. I am hoping to get a video on shooting vintage lenses with the S1 posted soon, so if that might interest you be on the look out for it. Thanks for commenting, and long live M4/3!! :)
As I mentioned in the video, I had the S1 as part of a collaboration project with LUMIX. I no longer have the S1, as I had to send it back to the manufacturer. The screen as it is currently is, is the primary reason I have not yet bought one. I'm waiting to see what they do with the S series, as they are planning to introduce a new, smaller body sometime in the near future. Looking forward to that new design, and hoping for something smaller and lighter, and yes, hopefully with an articulating screen, similar to the G9 with a FF sensor. Fingers crossed! Thanks for watching, and for your comment.
I think I am a good few years away from Lumix full frame. For starters because I think we are some time away from a wildlife camera and also the cost. They don't have the telephoto lenses yet and when they do come the cost is going to be horrendous 😂
I feel you, and I agree. I'm not a wildlife photographer, but if I were, it would be hard for me to use anything besides the Leica 100-400 on a smaller M4/3 body. Just due to size alone, that is a hard combination to beat! I am very excited tho to see what new, smaller version of the S1 they indicated would be soon released. That might tip me towards getting an S camera for the FF sensor because it is AMAZING, and building on the lenses slowly over time, but it won't replace my M4/3 cameras. I have spent the last nearly 10 years investing in my M4/3 lenses, and I am every bit as in love with their small size and outstanding performance today as I ever was. :)
@@graphiknation If I was doing portraits, weddings or things like that I think It's S series all the way but anything else M43 is hard to beat. Plus my PC hates 80mp high res files so would probably not want to edit anything out of the FF cameras 😂
@@JoeMaranophotography Yes, I think most people are too quick to jump to a "larger resolution" camera without considering whether or not they even need all that extra digital data. In reality in most cases, it's overkill and if you move around a lot you can only pack what you can carry. I never have to compromise on M4/3 because I can carry 2-3 bodies and 5+ lenses easily in a small shoulder bag. I also am very pleased with the portraits I can make on my M4/3 system. I use a lot of different lenses, including some vintage lenses which make really beautiful bokeh, and unique looking portraits, but my go-to favorites for shooting portraits are the Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 and OLY 75mm f/1.8 lenses. I did't get to use a true portrait lens with the S1, but I'm sure if I had, it would have been crushingly beautiful. :)
I love the GH series! Might be well worth the wait for the GH6! However I'm with you... S1 doesn't cut it and the S1H is WAY TOO EXPENSIVE! Too big, too heavy, poor AF, different SD card slots, no articulating screen, expensive and few lenses. I hate to say it but with the new cameras out in 2020 including the Canon R5, I will probably be spending my money elsewhere. I'm sure Panasonic will need to drop prices considerably on the S1 line in late 2020 if they want to stay competitive and continue finding buyers for the S1.
Hey thanks for your comment. I love overall loved the S1, I just really need an articulating screen if I'm going to spend that much, so I'm sticking with my G series and M4/3 for now. Hope you find the right fit for your needs, thanks again for watching and your comments.
Hey, sure thing! Here are links to those items. You can get the f/1.7 lens cheaper, as they are more common, but I would go for the extra aperture and get the f/1.4! Minolta Rokkor X f/1.4: amzn.to/2UJmGc3 Minolta Rokkor X f/1.7: amzn.to/2H7rmQA Fotasy Adapter for Minolta MD to Leica L mount: amzn.to/38c7EPK
Yes, that’s the case as it stands now. Maybe they will diversify the line of S cameras to offer more selection, similar to how they have designed the G series line up. That’s my hope anyway!
@@graphiknation I don't think so, three camera bodies are enough for now, just not enough lenses, they need to step on that. Maybe in the next generation they will make them smaller and lighter, just like the Leica SL2, that would be very welcome.
@@p_adam19 Yeah, I don't expect a new body design anytime soon, but I can see some variations over time. I would be very attracted to an S series camera that is smaller + lighter, with an articulating screen. If they ever make one, I will be the first in line to buy it! As for lenses, they have a good handful of lenses out now that cover most of your focal lengths, and of course the L mount alliance with Leica & Sigma will deliver a good selection by year's end. I didn't have any problems at all covering any focal length with the S1 and only 3 lenses, once I added the adapter for my vintage collection of Leica M & Minolta primes to fill in the gaps. I actually even preferred those smaller lenses in manual mode over the modern lenses, due to size and portability.
@@graphiknation Yes, I do like the concept of the Sigma fp, but as a camera it is full of flaws. I mainly use manual lenses as well and they look oversized on these cameras, that's my problem. I like the stabilisation, but the EOS R size and weight is as big I want to go, it does not feel truncated, still handles well with a bigger lens, has a good battery, etc.
@@p_adam19 Well, surely there is some middle ground, between the LUMIX S1 and the Sigma fp that isn't so polarizing. LOL. I will say tho, the sigma fp is a total baller move! Of course it's a direct copy (IMO) of the LUMIX GM1/GM5, with a FF sensor. I have owned a GM1 for many years, and I can tell you from experience, it may be small and sometimes awkward to handle, but it's the only camera I own that I absolutely never leave home without. no one's going to buy the fp as their main shooting workhorse camera, that's not the end game. the fp is a full second body backup camera, that gives you the flexibility to get pick up shots and multiple angles without having to break your whole rig down and change lenses. And it only takes up about as much space in your bag as a second battery. It's genius and revolutionary, and it's what LUMIX has been doing in M4/3 for over a decade, and the reason I switched to M4/3 to begin with. I hope LUMIX can bring that kind of innovation to the S series as well, since it's the reason I fell in love their cameras in the first place. I'm a little disappointed they let sigma beat them to a game they invented almost a decade ago, but maybe that was in their plan all along when they signed the contract for L mount alliance? I don't know, I don't work for LUMIX, but there's no denying if you have seen or used the GM1/GM5, this is a direct copy of that revolutionary design.
I agree, I prefer My M4/3 cameras for a few critical reasons, and size and weight are at the top of that list! I am looking forward to seeing the new smaller/lighter S body they are working on, that will be interesting 😁
Don't see the point of adding an articulating screen at all.. if you're doing video, you'll have to either upgrade or stick to micro 4/3rds. What's the downside? none ... Why would all the other photographers have to deal with a flimsy pant catcher just because vloggers want an added convenience they already have in a plethora of modern cameras....?
Because photography, as seen in the video for her particular use case, a fully articulated display gives you every option possible to get the photo you want, like trying to get a low angle looking up, or perhaps a portrait angle shot taken from above your head. Try to think outside the box there, mate, before assuming that only vloggers have a use for an articulated display.
@@jockturner1547 I heard what she said and I disagreed on the need to include the flippy pant catchers on photographic cameras. Besides, if she really doesn't mind the weight of the "heavy" camera, for the 20% of time 1% of users will use the flippy screen, they might as well get an external monitor and stop encouraging mfgs to ruin cameras with extra bulk, unnecessary features and higher prices. It's just my opinion. I welcome people to disagree. I just feel like this needs to be said.
Yes, so I have been told! And it's no secret the S1 was modeled after the G9. I am seriously considering it! My biggest hurdle is the size and weight. I got rid of my GX8 because it was too big & heavy, and it sat on a shelf most days for that reason. But after using the S1, I'm thinking maybe I can get used to the size of the G9. And of course it will fit my smaller lenses, so that is a huge plus! :)
Yeah I understand about the weight. But coming from a GO owner, it does fit the hand pretty perfectly (I had to buy a second one lmao). If you ever wanna try it out, just let me know 👍🏾. Awesome video too!
Right on! I tend to lean more towards the Lumix/Leica glass, but I absolutely love my Oly 75mm f/1.8 & 45mm f/1.8 primes! I also love my Oly PEN cameras too - I have a PEN-F and a PEN EP-5 that is converted for hyper color infrared. :)
@@graphiknation dont know if i dare mention here but have recently purchased sony rx10 iv bridge camera. (pre loved ) my life this thing is unbeliveable you can photo a fly on the window full size then zoom in at 600 mm optical zoom photo the same fly on the church tower almost full size. throw in 24 frames per sec with autofocus and metering between frames raw. and to finish 4k video s log if you want. and lots more fancy tricks. amazing still like messing with vintage glass on g9 as well as pro lens. i use om lens cheap as chips as we say in the uk. also have lumix s1 with adapter for old om glass. its all a bit of fun messing with these things
Now, now there's no need for name-calling, we all are entitled to our preferences. :) There are plenty of reasons for why or why not on both sides, and the best camera in the world can still take crappy pictures in the hands of someone who doesn't know how to use it. Of the many cameras I own and have used over the years, M4/3 is hands-down my favorite system, and the only one I never leave home without. Thanks for watching.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
I really hate "fully articuladed screens"... I prefer this solution.
Same, selfie screens suck and they're more prone to damage. If you need a screen pointing the other way just get an external one.
I use an S1R for landscape, portrait and street photography and the G9 for wildlife both are amazing cameras
Hey Mark, thanks so much for watching! Both great cameras, indeed! And I agree 100% that M4/3 is the only way to go for wildlife/telephoto shooting! I'm planning on making a video on this very topic sometime soon, so be on the lookout. Thanks again for watching! :)
Finally youtube bring me to this awesome channel, thanks for your video even it's 2 years ago, your information is really helpful for me, as a M43 GX9 user, to think about adopting Lumix S camera or not in the coming future ;)
hey, thanks so much Anson for watching, I am so glad you enjoyed this video! :)
S1 is more photo oriented, hence the screen, which is perfect for stills. The S5 has the articulating screen which I detest using.
You are so good at reviews! It's always heart warming to find a person that loves what they do, shares their experience with others and does so in such a splendid fashion. Loved all the pictures, but the one at 6:43 really showed your joy. Nice smile! I look forward to more content. Oh, really like your honesty about the screen. Why on earth would they not use a fully articulating screen is beyond me. Best wishes.
Hey, Dale thanks so much for watching and your kind remarks. As for the screen, I personally think they left it out because at the time of launch, no other FF mirrorless camera had such a feature and they wanted to appeal to "professionals". I am not sure why so many photographers bash this kind of screen, it's absolutely the most useful and flexible for so many different shooting scenarios. But I digress. Anyway, I'm VERY excited about the S5! An articulating screen AND it's much lighter and smaller. Definitely checks all the boxes. Can't wait for mine to arrive :)
Thank you for this. As a GH5 filmmaker and Olympus still shooter, I am really looking forward to shooting with the S1! BTW, the tilting screen is more appealing to me than the video centric "floppy" screen...
Hey thanks so much for watching! The S1 is an amazing camera! If you prefer a tilting screen, I’m sure you will just love it. I bought the S5 myself, which I love because it’s lighter/smaller and has the flip screen I prefer. There are days when I miss the incredible EVF on the S1 though. Thanks again for watching and enjoy your new S1!
Which voigtlander and how did you adapt?! Nice video btw!
Hey, I’m using an older version of the Voigtlander 15mmm Heliar Aspherical Wide angle lens. The one I have usually sells on eBay around $400-$500-ish.
I feature that lens in another video, if you want to see more image samples and get a better look at it (skip to about 1:40):
ruclips.net/video/wsyfyukFCQ0/видео.html
It’s a Leica M-mount lens, so I use an LM to LL adapter, like this one: amzn.to/3c7B2sG
Here's a link to a newer version of the 15mm Voigtlander:
amzn.to/32ASfXi
I'm sure the newer one is better, but I really like the older one I have. Its super-small and lightweight, it's really sharp, and it creates gorgeous starbursts when you stop it down a bit. It has some heavy vignetting due to the small size of the glass, but I don't mind it, I usually will add some vignetting in post anyway.
Thanks so much for watching!
Its good in recovering highlights and even shadows.
Hey, yes I agree, I t’s definitely got amazing dynamic range, and is all around a spectacular camera. Thanks for watching!
Funny, I have an S5 but I just bought a 2nd hand S1 mainly for this tilting screen and the better viewfinder. I also like manual focus lenses and plan to use old Canon EF L glass because they still have a 'real' focus ring for good control, not this focus by wire mistake.
Hey, thanks for watching! I do miss that gorgeous EVF on the S1, that is for sure. If I were solely FF, pairing these 2 cameras is a totally awesome setup, getting the benefits of both (I personally tend to lean more M4/3 for about 80% of my shooting). I did speak to someone at LUMIX though who told me they had no choice with the S5 in regards to the EVF, due to it's smaller more compact size and the distribution of heat with all that is packed into the camera (I think this is also the reason for the mini HDMI, but I may be wrong about that).
Anyway, they are 2 very similar cameras with unique differences that meet very specific needs. I really appreciate that we have the option to choose :) I hope you enjoy them both, happy shooting!
Another great video. Loved seeing you
In your element!
Hey thanks so much for watching David, I’m glad you enjoyed the video! 😀
Nice review. I m in love with Panasonic cameras. I use the G9 (great camera) and i am thinking the pros and cons to move to S5.
Hey Andreas, thanks so much for watching! I am in love with my LUMIX gear as well, so we share that passion. Although I don't own one (I opted for the lighter/smaller G85) the G9 is an amazing camera! The S5 is also outstanding, I ordered mine right away upon it's release and I freaking love it, and highly recommend it. Here's a link to check out my "unboxing" video: ruclips.net/video/K3rkHnSbOHI/видео.html
I personally use both systems and I don't have plans to abandon M4/3 for the L-mount any time soon. They each serve different purposes for me, and there are many times when M4/3 is a better option. I love the smaller, lighter overall system. Having lenses that weigh next to nothing makes a big difference in how much I can carry around or travel with. I also have smaller M4/3 cameras I prefer over something as large as the G9, but the S5 could easily add up (in cost and weight) with the larger L-mount lenses.
Of course, it may not be cost efficient to keep both, if you are looking to sell in order to upgrade to the S5. I guess I just love my M4/3 gear, and I have so many lenses and focal lengths that my options are endless. I also use passive, inexpensive adapters to share vintage lenses across both systems. This doubles your focal length on M/3, so you can carry 3 primes with both cameras and get 6 different focal lengths due to the crop factor. I talk about this in my "vintage lenses" video if you haven't seen that yet, check it out. Here is the link (jump to about 4:30): ruclips.net/video/wsyfyukFCQ0/видео.html
Thanks again for watching and whatever you decide, I am sure you will be happy with your LUMIX gear either way. :)
@@graphiknation thank you very much for your time to write to me. I appreciate. I d like to know your fb or Instagram to follow you and... if you want, to follow me as well. I am amateur enthusiast about photography and I d love to learn from experienced people.
@@MrJapanforce hey Andreas, thanks I am happy to offer my insights to a fellow LUMIX enthusiast! You can find me as graphiknation on Instagram and Facebook but I rarely post on FB these days so IG is the better place to find me. ☺️
If you liked the S1 (yes..!), you'll love the G9. It's MFT perfection. Cool review btw...
Hey thanks so much for watching and for the reco, I’m seriously considering it! 😀
The rear LCD on the G9 is the street photographers hell. Tilt is so much quicker and unobtrusive.
Brilliant video. I'm thinking of upgrading from my g9 to this, or the S5.
hey thanks so much for watching! They are both fantastic cameras! I personally chose the S5 for it's smaller/lighter size and the articulating screen was a deal breaker for me with the S1. That EVF though is pretty spectacular. I can't say I really miss it on the S5 because the EVF is sufficient, and I love the handling of that camera so much it doesn't ever occur to me when I am out shooting that I don't have the higher quality EVF of the S1. I just remember it as very impressive and one of my favorite features of the S1. I don't think you can go wrong either way, both are spectacular and a joy to use.
For a few years I became obsessed with camera weight. After carrying around a Canon 5D3 with a heavy prime or zoom lens for years, I was keen to reduce weight. So I wouldn't even look at any camera/lens ensemble that weighed over about 800g. That meant shooting APS-C Fuji and Sony cameras.
A few months ago my friendly camera store took in a used Lumix S1 and lent it to me to try without charge. At first it felt like a huge lead weight in my hands but I decided to persevere. After a week I was hooked and there was no way I was giving that camera back. This is the most under-rated camera on the market in my opinion. It has many faults its true; poor autofocus compared to other cameras in its class, plus a limited choice of huge, heavy, expensive lenses.
BUT - as you mention in your video, it feels so good in the hands. Everything fits to make it a wonderful camera to hold and use. The dynamic range is excellent. I have never owned a digital FF camera that holds highlights as well as this. Leica and Voigtlander M mount lenses perform better with this camera (with an adapter) than they do on the Sony A7's, especially with wider lenses (less vignetting).
Two things you didn't mention/emphasise enough: The image stabilisation system has to be the best in any FF camera system (albeit I haven't tested them all of course). I can hand hold this camera at 1/8th second and get very sharp results if I am well braced. Second: That shutter - its character and its sound are like a lullaby to a baby for me. Sometimes I switch the camera on and make an exposure with the lens cap on, just to appreciate the engineering that must have gone into it.
Panasonic put a lot into this camera. I hope they continue with the system. Its weight is a burden for sure, but for me there is no question that it is worth carrying.
Hey, thanks so much for watching! I agree with all the points you have made, and the S1 is no doubt an exceptional camera! I never doubted it would be, as I have been a die-hard LUMIX enthusiast for years, but I could never have predicted that I would so quickly forgive it’s large size and weight. As a M4/3 shooter, I highly value portability and the S1 is quite a jump for me on that count alone. I personally don’t prioritize autofocus as much as some other features, so shooting with my smaller vintage Leica lenses made using the S1 a much more pleasurable experience and I found no compromise at all in terms of image quality. I also have to say the dynamic range is the most impressive I have ever seen, but I also was not surprised by this at all, as I have always loved the colors and image quality of my LUMIX cameras, it met all my expectations.
One thing to point out on stabilization, which yes it is fantastic on the S1, but I guess it didn’t strike me as unique since I can easily shoot handheld on most of my M4/3 cameras at shutters of 1/4, 1/6, 1/8, etc and have done so for years now. I don’t own any other modern FF cameras to compare it to, so my benchmark for comparison is my M4/3 system. The S1 for me was like my favorite LUMIX camera, with super powers LOL. I am not sure what your relationship is to your local camera store, but if they will lend you gear for experimentation, I would highly recommend asking to test drive the LUMIX G9 (for which the S1 was modeled after). If you can also get your hands on the Leica 12-60 f/2.8-4.0 and the Leica 50-200 f2.8-4.0 and either 42.5 lens (the f1.2 or f/1.7), you will likely never go back to a larger system. It’s just incredible the quality you can get in such a smaller and lighter system, and LUMIX cameras are extremely user friendly and hard to beat on ergonomics (IMO, of course).
I am so glad you found your way to the S1, and I am sure you will enjoy it for years to come. It was a sad day indeed when I had to send it back to LUMIX, but it gave me such a good experience shooting with the larger body, that it helped me figure out which M/4/3 cameras to focus on in the future. If they make a smaller body S series camera, I’m sure I will be the first in line to buy it. The lenses are insanely large and expensive, but I have never used a kit lens that was as impressive as the one that comes with the S1, so right out of the box, you are at a much better starting point than most. And if you have vintage or other lenses you can adapt, that’s a good place to start building from. Thanks again for watching, and for your thoughtful in-depth remarks.
I shoot M43 and I might go full frame at some point but I'm not going to buy a full set again like I did with M43. I shoot weddings and I have a lot of gear. It's too much of a headache when I have a setup that does the job and it's a lot of money buying into a new setup. But I might buy a full frame camera maybe one or two lens for a look I want but not a full setup.
There was a time when I was thinking of selling my M43 gear but DXO PhotoLab and DXO PureRaw with Deep Prime fixed the noise issue and Luminar I can use for extra bokeh when I need it.
Hey, thanks so much for watching! I agree with you, there is no reason to leave M4/3 for a larger system. Everything just gets larger, heavier and more expensive. Not nearly enough credit is given to the M4/3 system for all of it's wonderful advantages in size, weight, cost, and even features like DOF and low light have their advantages over larger sensors. It's important to note that when speaking on noise and ISO, we make sure to compare accurate equivalents considering the crop factor conversion which on M4/3 is x/÷ (4) or (so 1600 ISO on M4/3 = 6400 ISO on FF).
If you're using wide aperture primes on M4/3 (1.2/1.4/1.8/2.0/2.8) it's my long held opinion that you are actually getting the best possible combination of specs for the best end results. No one ever talks about how deeper depth of field can be a benefit, which in most cases shooting wide open at 1.4 or 1.8, etc on FF gives such a shallow depth of field that you would need to stop down to at least 2.8 or even 4.0 to get enough of your subject in sharp enough focus to be considered a "good" image (especially in portraits, product or macro photography. On m4/3 you can keep that aperture wide open at 1.4 (or whatever) and get all the benefits of the maximum amount of light, get enough of your subject in sharp focus AND also achieve pleasing bokeh and background blur.
M4/3 is still my go-to and (IMO) the most flexible system you can buy into. I love my S5, but I still walk out the door 80% of the time with a M4/3 camera in hand.
Thanks again for watching, happy shooting and I hope you enjoy your M4/3 or whatever system you end up choosing. If you love it, that's all that matters. :)
Great review with excellent shots and I like how you explain your work and put things in context. So, liked and subbed. I have both, S1 and G9, but tbh I have not used the G9 much for fotos since the S1 arrived. Sensor size matters, especially at low light. But what I much like is that the G9 received a massive video update, so it now does 10bit 422 internally which makes it a very powerful hybrid camera.
hey thanks so much for your comment and for the follow :) I agree, the resolution on the S1 is stunning! If they would make a version with an articulating screen, I would not hesitate to buy it. I'm still looking at the G9, and I may get it. But I currently have too many M4/3 cameras, so I might have to sell something to justify adding another one to my collection. LOL
I recently upgraded from M4/3 to a Sony A7ii. As a sometimes, street photographer who shoots with vintage/classic lenses I find the full frame captures more of the character of these old lenses because it's not cropping out 75% of the image circle where most of that character lives. I still like my micro 4/3s for their portability so I will keep them for the time being. If I were traveling, I might be tempted to take a small kit consisting of an M4/3 body and a handful of lenses but it would depend on where I was traveling to.
Hey, thanks so much for watching! Happy to hear you're hanging on to the M4/3 gear, at least for now. I personally love using my FF S5 in combination with my M4/3 and my collection of vintage lenses to achieve different looks with each format. You can double your lens options using adapters and carry less gear around, and I really like that. :) I don't shoot Sony, but I hope you are enjoying the A7ii. Thanks again for watching and engaging.
Great video. The S1 looks amazing but too big for me. I do like the tilting screen because you can tilt it for portrait shots, I wish I had that on my little GX80 :-)
Hey, Michael, thanks so much for watching and for your comment. It’s a big camera for sure, but the image quality is insane! I would not drop my M4/3 system for it, because portability is just such a high priority for me, but I would absolutely love to have the S1 as a compliment. If you have any interest, check out my video on using vintage lenses with the S1. If you have a collection of other lenses that can be adapted for it, the S1 becomes a lot more manageable with smaller, vintage glass - and you can share the same lenses across you M/43 cameras as well, and get completely different focal length! It’s a pretty great marriage of old school & new tech, if you can live without autofocus of course. LOL Thanks again for watching! Here's that link to the vintage lenses video if you want to check it out:
ruclips.net/video/wsyfyukFCQ0/видео.html
great information for someone who just upgraded to the G9. Amazing camera but the full frame world sure looks beautiful
Hey thanks so much! And congrats on the upgrade to the G9, it's an amazing camera! The FF is pretty sweet, but the G series cameras are still pretty impressive too. Thanks for watch & commenting! :)
@@graphiknation I was to ask the name of the vintage lens you used in the video, the 15mm?
@@adamlord Sure thing, I am working on a new video all about the vintage lenses I used. :) the 15mm is a vintage Voigtlander M mount lens. They no longer make the exact version that I have, but there is a newer one (same specs, just looks a little different). Here is a link to the current version on Amazon: amzn.to/32ASfXi
The G9 won’t disappoint if you already have the m43 lens collection or try the S5 if you’re a hybrid shooter, great in low light with the FF 24 sensor and both have the flippy screen you crave for! Great production btw, thanks. 📸👍👏
Hey thanks so much for watching! I actually went with a used G85 that I picked up locally for a good price, and held out for the S5! I pre-ordered it on day 1, without hesitation.
You can check out my unboxing video here:
ruclips.net/video/K3rkHnSbOHI/видео.html
I know the G9 is such a fantastic camera, but I really prefer a smaller, lighter body so the G85 suits me just fine for M4/3. It's also a great companion to the S5. I would take one of every model if I could, lol. Thanks again for watching and engaging, happy shooting!
@@graphiknation Nice catch I’ll check out the link, not too dissimilar ergo’s to the G9, love my LUMIX cameras and the M43 system. I found a great used GX9 with a oly 17 1.8 on eBay, great combo, like new and I use the touch screen shutter with discreet shooting from the hip, So happy with it for the street, not a flippy! But I did mount a little action cam on the hot the other day, worked well, just starting think about video myself. Keep up the great work, got my sub and support.
@@guidetheride2103 that's awesome, I love the GX9, it's such a great little camera! perfect for street and travel, you will get a lot of use out of it. I have a GF8 and a GM1, and they are both extremely small and light, very discreet. if I didn't already have those 2older cameras, I would have bought a GX9 myself by now. thanks so much for the sub and support! :)
I got the s5 but want the s1 for the screen😅
Nice Video. Do you find any issue with autofocus in S1?
Hi Pankaj, thanks so much for watching and your question regarding autofocus. I personally did not have any problems at all with the autofocus system. Bear in mind LUMIX cameras have been my primary system for almost 10 years now, so using the contrast-based AF was a seamless experience for me, and it worked perfectly and as expected. I should also point out that I don’t shoot a lot of sports or fast action, so I don’t prioritize the auto focus feature as much as some other features. I also prefer using my vintage primes on the S1 due to it’s large size and weight anyway, so auto focus just doesn’t matter that much to me. Thanks again for watching and for your question, I hope my answer is helpful.
graphiknation Thank you
Hello
Love your review. Thank you. I saw you purchased the s5
I am using omd m1 for years and is looking for full frame to shoot with vantage lens. What would be your advise s1 or s5 ?
Thank you !
Hey thanks so much for watching! As much as I loved the S1, it was a bit too large and cumbersome for me personally, and as I mentioned in the video, the titling screen was a deal breaker for me. Both the S1 and S5 have the same sensor, so image quality is exactly the same (at least for photography). I would say if you care about the articulating screen, the S5 is a better option. If you don't care about that, and the extra weight in hand doesn't bother you, but you really like shooting thru the EVF (rather than the LCD screen), the resolution and quality of the EVF on the S1 is superb. It's really going to come down to your own personal preferences. I love the S5 and I am 100% happy with that beautiful camera. Best of luck, and happy shooting!
Here are my Amazon Affiliate links to both cameras if you want to compare models and read reviews:
LUMIX S5: amzn.to/3xXpZiY
LUMIX S1: amzn.to/3xwxADE
One thing you might consider is which lens you might want to get. You can of course buy either camera “body only” but it’s a better deal to get with the kit lens.
The 20-60mm 3.5-5.6 that comes with the S5 is light weight and compact, but the 24-104mm f/4 that comes with the S1 is a much better lens in my opinion. It’s of course heavier and larger as well, but the constant aperture, extended reach, stabilization and macro abilities of the 24-105 is far better than the 20-60.
Fabulous review! Thanks!
Hey, thanks so much for watching, I am glad you enjoyed the video! :)
graphiknation fabulous camera, but a real pity that AF is subpar to everything else on the market.
@@lukmie2769 I hear you, and that is certainly a valid and widely shared opinion of the AF system. I guess it depends what your shooting? I tend to shoot AF-S or manual focus most of the time, so the AF wasn't a big point of contention for me. Perhaps if I shot more fast action and sports it would be, but I rarely switch into AF-C so I never had a problem. Thanks again for your thoughts! :)
Nice images and review, but misnamed - this isn’t street photography as much as it is photographs/footage of streetscapes. Where are the people? I’m tilting toward this system, but needed to know if the AF is responsive enough to catch people interacting on the streets.
Hey Fred, thanks so much for watching and for your comment, which is a great point and I hear you. While I do take a lot of street photos that include people in the frame, I personally don't feel comfortable sharing those images of unknown strangers on such a public, global platform as RUclips. It's just my personal moral/ethical standard, regardless of how the law applies to photographing people in public spaces.
As for the autofocus on the S1, I had no trouble with it at all, and it performs as well as or better than any other LUMIX camera that I have ever owned.
In all honesty, I don't prioritize auto focus as high as some other features, and I tend to use a lot of vintage and manual focus lenses anyway, so it just isn't something I think about very often. In traditional street photography, I personally follow the Henry-Cartier Bresson method of "the decisive moment" where capturing those fleeting scenes relies most heavily on the instincts, intuition and skill of the photographer, and is less dependent on advanced tech and auto settings in-camera. I think the AF on the S1 is more than capable of handling most shooting scenarios, but I don't shoot a lot of sports or fast action, so I did not put it to a rigorous test in that regard. I hope this answers your question, and thanks again for your comment and for watching.
@@graphiknation Hey, mate- thanks heaps for this detailed, thoughtful reply- much obliged! Appreciate your explanation and personal ethics too. I'm not so shy about posting street pics, but I'm definitely no ambush photog like Bruce Gilden. I'm currently in the Fuji 'eco-system' (god I hate that corporate speak). I've been a fuji fanboy for many years, but really want another system for better low light ISO performance and a little more IQ in the studio. I like that the S1 is a serious piece of engineering, whereas the Sonys have cut corners on screen, EVF and general build quality. I live in Saigon and when it rains here, it's serious. I like that the Lumix is genuinely weather sealed. I am yet to get my hands on the S1, so I'm looking forward to doing so, maybe tomorrow. Thanks again for the reply.
@@fredaberyEPP Hey Fred, you're welcome :) I don't have experience with Fuji, but I have read and heard great things about them. I would love to try a Fuji sometime, they have a very nostalgic, vintage appeal that I really like. I don't love Sony myself either. While they do some things well, my biggest disappointment in them is their color profiles look horrible in comparison to my other cameras (I have LUMIX, Olympus, Leica & Pentax cameras).
It sounds like the S1 would be a very good fit in many ways for your needs regarding ISO, IQ and weather sealing, and I can add just overall design, build and ergonomics, it's just an outstanding and beautifully designed camera. I think the AF is something they get a lot of harsh criticism for, but I have never had any problems with my LUMIX cameras. If you can try one in-store somewhere, that would be ideal. I have also rented gear that I have been on the fence about buying, just to make sure it's a good fit for my needs. You spend a little more that way, but it's a big investment, so I like to have that peace of mind. On the other hand, the S1 is such a high quality product, even if you decide it's not meeting your expectations, I can't imagine you would have a hard time selling it for a fair price. Best of luck, and thanks again for watching!
Thanks for the vidéo.
I Made the step few weeks ago to sell one of the best DSLR (Nikon D850) to switch to this hybrid full frame. The purpose for me was to mount my M Lenses and travel Light, use the focus assistance (peaking and zoom) and the wonderfull EVF. It’s a pleasure to use but I think the best for M Lenses is M bodies in terms of global expérience. The kit lens is impressive and moreover it does kind of macro. The 50mm S Pro 1.4 is the best AF 50mm I ever used.
Hey, thanks for your comment, and for watching! I too agree, native lenses are best suited to their respective native mount cameras, and the lenses for the S1 are very impressive. I just like having an option to downsize for travel and street, and still be able to use the S1 with all of it’s powerful capabilities and modern tech. The 50mm S Pro lens for me was a hard sell, due to it’s mammoth size and weight. I really struggled every time I took it out to shoot, and as high quality as it may be, I didn’t enjoy it as much as the smaller lenses. I am of course a huge fan and supporter of the micro four thirds system, so I have that inherent bias regarding size and portability. :)
Very beautiful video, images and narrative, truly professional.. Please do more things like this on lens review, and your experiences on using adapted lens..
Hey Thanks so much! Working on a video for adapted vintage lenses to the S1 body now, actually! Hope to get it uploaded soon, thanks so much for watching and for your feedback, it helps a lot! :)
Nice job! Sorry what kind of adapter did you use for the small lenses? Were those m43 lens? Or just full frame vintage? Thx
Hey, I use mostly Haoge + Beschoi brand passive adapters for my vintage lenses. What lenses are you trying to adapt? Sadly M4/3 are too small, but if you have other APS-C, FF or older film lenses, you should be able to find an adapter to use them on the S1.
Always great to see another Atlanta based Photographer putting out great content...I was really interested in the S1/S1R when they dropped but once I got my big mitts on a body, it was too small :-( Why must I have the hands of a Sasquatch?!?
Hey, thanks! It's always great to connect with a local, I hope you can make it to a meetup sometime! Also, that's the first I have heard anyone say the S1 is not big enough. LOL How long did you spend with it? I'm just curious because my initial impression was that it was way too large and too heavy, but I got used to it within about the first week or maybe 2? Anyway, I use really small M4/3 cameras most of the time, and having the S1 was a stark contrast to my normal set up, but I somehow adapted to the dramatic change in a short time. It even made me rethink my entire, years-long resistance to the larger G series camera bodies, and seriously consider getting a G9 or GH5. Thanks for watching, and I hope to see you out on the street in ATL! :)
Excellent images and excellent video I've been looking at what I'm gonna use as a sucking camera to my AGU X180 in my document Terry video production kit and I'm basically looking at the GH5S on the shore and this S1 is really pricey but I'm looking at it just the same...
Hey Thanks so much! That's a hard choice to make, indeed! Do you have lenses for either system? They are both excellent, which I am sure you know. The G series for video is hard to beat right now, since the lenses available are vast and plenty, and of course m4/3, while still not cheap, is more affordable than the FF. Either way, you can't really go wrong with anything from Panasonic for video. :)
@@graphiknation I do not have any native Panasonic or lumex's lenses what I do have is on the old nikon lenses for the FM35 millimeter DSLR and FI to and I have a single lens for my Canon 70 which is A28135R rendering lens so when I buy a when I'm thinking is as an G5 mouse when I buy RGH5 us when I buy that my main goal is 3 fold 1 on camer that will be useful on a gimbal and a glide Cam type of stabilizer and to low light and 3 it will be a camera that I can use to hike and keep on my motorcycle with me I bought the AGU X180 for reasons that were one it's an integrated lands and it covers a wide range and is actually a very good camera number 2 it all M also has dual XLR inputs and several modes on the inputs and it also does a variety of formats to include 4K full size the problem with the that particular 4K recording is is that it's 8 bit instead attend it however I can get around the 8 bit problem by using and at most ninja 5 external monitor with an H DMI cable because that monitor does record 4K and I42 to 10 bed is A4210V or 40010 dead either way it records 4K and 10 bit so I can use that as a work around in then marry the 2 together or I can just shoot with AGH5 us in 10 bit and then down reza but that's what I'm looking at I was just looking at the the a** 1 at you as showing us their and determining whether I really want to get that and use that to as a second camera but I think I'm going to stick with a with AGH5 us just because of its size in it's still close enough to the to the M AGU X180 that of a be extremely useful in what I'm trying to do and I apologize for any translation errors here I'm driving and talking into my phone
FE2 Nikon....
05:42 Oh God not you as well. I would have thought that you as a street photographer would realise that the side hinged selfie screen is a disaster for street. Why oh why, seriously?
Hey Chloe thanks for watching and sharing your thoughts. I respect your opinion however I disagree. I will never understand why so many people think a fully articulating screen that enables shooting and framing from literally any position is good for nothing but "selfies"? But nonetheless, we are all entitled to our preferences. Potato/tomato right?
Budget lens for the s1 for photography?
Hey, thanks so much for watching and for your question. It’s a hard one to answer without knowing more about what you want to shoot, what focal lengths you like, if you need a wide aperture, etc…. so many variables to consider. I did make another video however on my experience using some of my vintage lenses on the S1 if you want to check that out, here is that link.:
ruclips.net/video/wsyfyukFCQ0/видео.html
In that video, I talk about a handful of lens options I used, and there are some links included to some pretty cool primes that you can look into. The good news is the S1 comes with an outstanding kit lens, and it is very easy to adapt to most any lens mount with the correct adapter. So you may already own something you can simply pick up an adapter for. I hope this helps at least a little. Thanks again for watching and I hope you find the right lens that fits your needs and your budget. :)
Hey thnx for your Quick anser. I shoot sport landscape. Vacation etc.
I have de 24-105 f4 i would like a wider lens. One that would be great to take to the Woods as 1 lens.
And a longer one. I was tinking about the 100-400 sigma.
Any of those vintage lenses that can auto focus?
@@luukkleinsman4522 Yeah, sports is tough, you need a big ole lens for that, and they are typically heavy and expensive. LOL
The L mount lenses by Sigma are probably your best bet, as they are not as expensive as the Leica & LUMIX lenses, but still not cheap. You won't get autofocus with any vintage lens, but you can find newer lenses with auto focus features, and possibly get an active adapter that enables the autofocus to work on the S1. I am not sure how "budget friendly" that would be, or how well the autofocus would perform? You might want to check out Photo Joseph's video on adapting lenses to the S1 too, he talks about a lot of different options. Here is that link:
ruclips.net/video/DFpgJ-_U3Ro/видео.html
I use the S1 for wedding photography and I love the native lenses. However, I’d love to get some smaller MF lenses to mount on it. I’d love to see a video on your adapter and what lenses you are using.
Hey thanks so much for your comment! The native lenses are indeed superb, but do love the smaller prime options for those times when you just want to lighten your load. I am actually working on a video on this very subject, so hopefully I will have that completed & uploaded soon. :) In the meantime, I can tell you I mostly used M mount Leica & Voigtlander lenses (older/vintage versions), with an inexpensive adapter I picked up on Amazon. I also used my Minolta Rokkor-X, same inexpressive adapter via Amazon, which wasn't hard to find. I have a ton of Pentax lenses, but I wasn't able to find an adapter for Pentax-K to L. So, if you have any lenses from another system you might want to to try using, I would search for an L mount adapter for that particular lens mount, and see if there is something available. I paid around $20 I think for the adapters I found on Amazon, and they were Beschoi & Fotasy brands.
@@graphiknation Cool. Yeah, I'm interested in getting some Voigtlander M mount lenses. I'm not that versed in manual focus but it seems very easy on the S1. I use focus peaking even in AF and of course the EVF is so easy to see. I shoot weddings so only occasionally use MF (ring shots, etc.), but thought it would be nice for engagement shoots for a different look with these Voigtlanders and whatever else i might want to add. Thanks for the reply!
@@stevevansak7324 Hey Steve, new video on vintage lenses is finally up, if you want to check it out. I hope you find a nice Voigtlander for your weddings! Here's the link: ruclips.net/video/wsyfyukFCQ0/видео.html
Good review 👍🏻, nice pace and some great sample videos and photos. Hopefully you can get your hands on a G9. I’d be interested in your comparison G9 vs S1. I love my G9 but haven’t had a chance to try the S1 yet. Subscribed.
Hey thanks Rufus, I would love to compare the G9 to the S1, that would be a fun test! I don't know if you ever considered it, but you can always rent the S1 for a week just to give it a try. I love lensrentals.com because they carry M4/3, and they have an option to buy to if you like the gear, which is awesome. Thanks so much for watching and subscribing! :)
GREAT video Lauren. You're the lens adapter Queen! PEACE from ATL ✊🏾📸
Haha, thanks Rob! I do love my vintage prime lenses! LOL :)
Thanks for the review....It seems like a truly great camera, but the prices of their lenses are out of this world.
I can understand that perspective for sure, they are expensive. I am not fully up to speed on the entire landscape of full frame lenses across competing brands, but I expect they are on-par with the pricing of similar quality optics in that category. However, you can always use an L-mount adapter to pair other lenses with the S1! I really loved using some of my vintage lenses with the S1, and I got very good results. Check out my latest video on adapting vintage primes for the S1 if you’re interested, here's a link: ruclips.net/video/wsyfyukFCQ0/видео.html
Thanks for watching, and your comments. :)
Real photography passion, nice atmosphere, great info... Subscribed instantly 🙂
Hey Thanks so much, Hans for watching, subscribing and your kind remarks! :)
The colors look so good!
Doesn’t look like Hotlanta to me. Then again - last there 8 years ago…🙄
Hey thanks so much for watching Michael, and yes much has definitely changed in the last 8 years!
You know, I really want to like the S1, but the main roadblock for me is the size and weight. I went to m43 and Leica M because I was sick of the size and weight of my Canon 5D Mark II. The S1 just takes me back to Canon and worse.
I hear you, and I know the feeling. I left a Nikon system for M4/3 in 2011 for the same reason! I will never let go of my M4/3 gear, I love it too much, and I'm still using cameras made by LUMIX & Olympus from 2012-2015 (which speaks to their quality). I am interested in seeing the new, smaller body S camera that they have recently talked about in DPReview. That would peak my interest, and I would love to have it as a compliment (not a replacement) to my M4/3 gear. I absolutely loved shooting with the S1 and my M mount vintage lenses! It was great fun, and so much lighter and better suited to travel & street photography. I can't deny the quality and resolution of that FF sensor paired with the charm and compact size of vintage glass felt like I was getting best of both worlds. It was truly an awesome combination. I am hoping to get a video on shooting vintage lenses with the S1 posted soon, so if that might interest you be on the look out for it. Thanks for commenting, and long live M4/3!! :)
Good content , Great potential! I have the S1 as well. Looking forward to more videos.. Be safe God Bless
Hey thanks so much for watching and for the kind words! :)
Please make sense!
How can the flip out monitor be a deal breaker when clearly you bought the camera?
As I mentioned in the video, I had the S1 as part of a collaboration project with LUMIX. I no longer have the S1, as I had to send it back to the manufacturer. The screen as it is currently is, is the primary reason I have not yet bought one. I'm waiting to see what they do with the S series, as they are planning to introduce a new, smaller body sometime in the near future. Looking forward to that new design, and hoping for something smaller and lighter, and yes, hopefully with an articulating screen, similar to the G9 with a FF sensor. Fingers crossed! Thanks for watching, and for your comment.
I think I am a good few years away from Lumix full frame. For starters because I think we are some time away from a wildlife camera and also the cost. They don't have the telephoto lenses yet and when they do come the cost is going to be horrendous 😂
I feel you, and I agree. I'm not a wildlife photographer, but if I were, it would be hard for me to use anything besides the Leica 100-400 on a smaller M4/3 body. Just due to size alone, that is a hard combination to beat! I am very excited tho to see what new, smaller version of the S1 they indicated would be soon released. That might tip me towards getting an S camera for the FF sensor because it is AMAZING, and building on the lenses slowly over time, but it won't replace my M4/3 cameras. I have spent the last nearly 10 years investing in my M4/3 lenses, and I am every bit as in love with their small size and outstanding performance today as I ever was. :)
@@graphiknation If I was doing portraits, weddings or things like that I think It's S series all the way but anything else M43 is hard to beat. Plus my PC hates 80mp high res files so would probably not want to edit anything out of the FF cameras 😂
@@JoeMaranophotography Yes, I think most people are too quick to jump to a "larger resolution" camera without considering whether or not they even need all that extra digital data. In reality in most cases, it's overkill and if you move around a lot you can only pack what you can carry. I never have to compromise on M4/3 because I can carry 2-3 bodies and 5+ lenses easily in a small shoulder bag. I also am very pleased with the portraits I can make on my M4/3 system. I use a lot of different lenses, including some vintage lenses which make really beautiful bokeh, and unique looking portraits, but my go-to favorites for shooting portraits are the Leica 42.5mm f/1.2 and OLY 75mm f/1.8 lenses. I did't get to use a true portrait lens with the S1, but I'm sure if I had, it would have been crushingly beautiful. :)
I love the GH series! Might be well worth the wait for the GH6! However I'm with you... S1 doesn't cut it and the S1H is WAY TOO EXPENSIVE! Too big, too heavy, poor AF, different SD card slots, no articulating screen, expensive and few lenses. I hate to say it but with the new cameras out in 2020 including the Canon R5, I will probably be spending my money elsewhere.
I'm sure Panasonic will need to drop prices considerably on the S1 line in late 2020 if they want to stay competitive and continue finding buyers for the S1.
Hey thanks for your comment. I love overall loved the S1, I just really need an articulating screen if I'm going to spend that much, so I'm sticking with my G series and M4/3 for now. Hope you find the right fit for your needs, thanks again for watching and your comments.
Hi, nice review. Could you put the link for the minolta 50mm and the adapter please ?
Hey, sure thing! Here are links to those items. You can get the f/1.7 lens cheaper, as they are more common, but I would go for the extra aperture and get the f/1.4!
Minolta Rokkor X f/1.4:
amzn.to/2UJmGc3
Minolta Rokkor X f/1.7:
amzn.to/2H7rmQA
Fotasy Adapter for Minolta MD to Leica L mount:
amzn.to/38c7EPK
Love your Videos....like to see more, 💙Everything but especially with the S1! 💜Just a little bit longer fade in the Info💫
Hey! Thanks so much, Lucia for your feedback and for watching! :)
Well, they did fix the screen in the S1H for double the cost.
Yes, that’s the case as it stands now. Maybe they will diversify the line of S cameras to offer more selection, similar to how they have designed the G series line up. That’s my hope anyway!
@@graphiknation I don't think so, three camera bodies are enough for now, just not enough lenses, they need to step on that.
Maybe in the next generation they will make them smaller and lighter, just like the Leica SL2, that would be very welcome.
@@p_adam19 Yeah, I don't expect a new body design anytime soon, but I can see some variations over time. I would be very attracted to an S series camera that is smaller + lighter, with an articulating screen. If they ever make one, I will be the first in line to buy it! As for lenses, they have a good handful of lenses out now that cover most of your focal lengths, and of course the L mount alliance with Leica & Sigma will deliver a good selection by year's end. I didn't have any problems at all covering any focal length with the S1 and only 3 lenses, once I added the adapter for my vintage collection of Leica M & Minolta primes to fill in the gaps. I actually even preferred those smaller lenses in manual mode over the modern lenses, due to size and portability.
@@graphiknation Yes, I do like the concept of the Sigma fp, but as a camera it is full of flaws. I mainly use manual lenses as well and they look oversized on these cameras, that's my problem. I like the stabilisation, but the EOS R size and weight is as big I want to go, it does not feel truncated, still handles well with a bigger lens, has a good battery, etc.
@@p_adam19 Well, surely there is some middle ground, between the LUMIX S1 and the Sigma fp that isn't so polarizing. LOL. I will say tho, the sigma fp is a total baller move! Of course it's a direct copy (IMO) of the LUMIX GM1/GM5, with a FF sensor. I have owned a GM1 for many years, and I can tell you from experience, it may be small and sometimes awkward to handle, but it's the only camera I own that I absolutely never leave home without. no one's going to buy the fp as their main shooting workhorse camera, that's not the end game. the fp is a full second body backup camera, that gives you the flexibility to get pick up shots and multiple angles without having to break your whole rig down and change lenses. And it only takes up about as much space in your bag as a second battery. It's genius and revolutionary, and it's what LUMIX has been doing in M4/3 for over a decade, and the reason I switched to M4/3 to begin with. I hope LUMIX can bring that kind of innovation to the S series as well, since it's the reason I fell in love their cameras in the first place. I'm a little disappointed they let sigma beat them to a game they invented almost a decade ago, but maybe that was in their plan all along when they signed the contract for L mount alliance? I don't know, I don't work for LUMIX, but there's no denying if you have seen or used the GM1/GM5, this is a direct copy of that revolutionary design.
Mirrorless Short be easy to carry -> Go m43
I agree, I prefer My M4/3 cameras for a few critical reasons, and size and weight are at the top of that list! I am looking forward to seeing the new smaller/lighter S body they are working on, that will be interesting 😁
Don't see the point of adding an articulating screen at all.. if you're doing video, you'll have to either upgrade or stick to micro 4/3rds. What's the downside? none ... Why would all the other photographers have to deal with a flimsy pant catcher just because vloggers want an added convenience they already have in a plethora of modern cameras....?
Because photography, as seen in the video for her particular use case, a fully articulated display gives you every option possible to get the photo you want, like trying to get a low angle looking up, or perhaps a portrait angle shot taken from above your head.
Try to think outside the box there, mate, before assuming that only vloggers have a use for an articulated display.
@@jockturner1547 I heard what she said and I disagreed on the need to include the flippy pant catchers on photographic cameras. Besides, if she really doesn't mind the weight of the "heavy" camera, for the 20% of time 1% of users will use the flippy screen, they might as well get an external monitor and stop encouraging mfgs to ruin cameras with extra bulk, unnecessary features and higher prices.
It's just my opinion. I welcome people to disagree.
I just feel like this needs to be said.
Nice Video
Hey, thanks so much for watching! :)
Hands down G9 is the most amazing 😉 piece of kit! Check it out!!!
Yes, so I have been told! And it's no secret the S1 was modeled after the G9. I am seriously considering it! My biggest hurdle is the size and weight. I got rid of my GX8 because it was too big & heavy, and it sat on a shelf most days for that reason. But after using the S1, I'm thinking maybe I can get used to the size of the G9. And of course it will fit my smaller lenses, so that is a huge plus! :)
Yeah I understand about the weight. But coming from a GO owner, it does fit the hand pretty perfectly (I had to buy a second one lmao). If you ever wanna try it out, just let me know 👍🏾. Awesome video too!
@@abo1245 Dude! I would love to try it sometime, if you want to connect and go shoot I am in. That would be awesome! :)
g9 + olympus pro lens = 😀
Right on! I tend to lean more towards the Lumix/Leica glass, but I absolutely love my Oly 75mm f/1.8 & 45mm f/1.8 primes! I also love my Oly PEN cameras too - I have a PEN-F and a PEN EP-5 that is converted for hyper color infrared. :)
@@graphiknation
dont know if i dare mention here
but have recently purchased sony rx10 iv bridge camera. (pre loved )
my life this thing is unbeliveable you can photo a fly on the window full size then zoom in at 600 mm optical zoom photo the same fly on the church tower almost full size.
throw in 24 frames per sec with autofocus and metering between frames raw.
and to finish 4k video s log if you want.
and lots more fancy tricks.
amazing
still like messing with vintage glass on g9
as well as pro lens. i use om lens cheap as chips as we say in the uk.
also have lumix s1 with adapter for old om glass.
its all a bit of fun messing with these things
I am in love 😍 with your style and your pretty face.
LUMIX sent me the camera but didnt ask me to give my opinion lmaooooo yea tf ok
Should you upgrade from M4/3?
Me: Why not!
'Micro 4/3 loser' (in camera conspiracies voice)
Now, now there's no need for name-calling, we all are entitled to our preferences. :) There are plenty of reasons for why or why not on both sides, and the best camera in the world can still take crappy pictures in the hands of someone who doesn't know how to use it. Of the many cameras I own and have used over the years, M4/3 is hands-down my favorite system, and the only one I never leave home without. Thanks for watching.
Vẫn thua leica SL
Ditch the stupid rings.