Oneitis originated from a very romantic ideal. The idea of a soulmate. It is a social construct that makes sense. It came as a counterpart to our promiscuity proclivity because we are promiscuous by nature and monogamous by choice. We work better as a society using monogamy as the building block for family formation. It is more stable and done right. It leads to a deeper intimacy. Nowadays, it has been destroyed by the hookup culture. The last generation that did monogamy successfully was the greatest generation.
Relationships have not evolve so much. It´s more feminism and romantisism, that made "the one it is" and "solemate" myth up in the last 50years. Women want men, but they don´t need them anymore. So never listen to women, when they talk about relationships and what that want. Just look who women sle+p with and who get divorced (even Tom Brady as a Beta Chad).
Casual dating is a mix of feminism and human being’s natural proclivity to resort to their default sexual behaviours. Men want to spread the seed (casual dating), and women want the best option (branch swinging, cheating on betas with alphas). When women don’t need security from betas anymore, what do women want to pursue? The exact alphas who don’t want to commit/stick around. Hence, the modern dating market.
I would like to see anyone get hungry and chase down their prey. I don't think we are designed to eat animals. We would eat some fruits and veggies we gathered or are growing.
I‘ve read all 5 and yes first, second and the last one „players handbook“are the most important one. But i have to recommend all of them, he has done the lords work and changed my life for the better years ago.
"Typical" is a more helpful word than "Average" . Because it emphasizes it is not a slur against a man's quality but an indication of common demographic traits. Because regardless of what level the NET TOTAL QUALITY of every-man on the planet is, women will still only WANT to pick from the top 20% of those men. e..g. the Quality of Life (home, food basics etc) of the "typical" man now in the USA is better than a man living in the 1700. AND if you teleported women from the 1700 directly into the apartment of a "typical" man, she would think he was living like a king, (a heated shower alone is something kings could only dream of), and she would dream of living her life with him in his home . . . . until she walked out the door, and saw the quality of life of the men in the top 20%. And despite the fact 2 minutes ago, she thought living with him was a DREAM come true, she would then instantly not consider him any more as a life partner, and instead she would WANT to be with a top 20% man. Whether or not she COULD get with a top 20% is irrelevant - she would still WANT to be with one of them. She might be with a typical man in the lower 80% out of necessity, but her WANT to be with another man is still there, which she will act upon that want if given the opportunity. Its also why telling men to "do better" misunderstands female nature. Because if EVERYMAN doubled his "value" over night, it would not change a thing, the top 20% men would still be the same top 20% men. It's more helpful to realize that women do not want most men (the typical man) when a man is considering where to put his focus in life.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Rolo’s take on 'oneitis' and the soulmate myth really highlights how relationships are evolving.
Oneitis originated from a very romantic ideal.
The idea of a soulmate.
It is a social construct that makes sense. It came as a counterpart to our promiscuity proclivity because we are promiscuous by nature and monogamous by choice.
We work better as a society using monogamy as the building block for family formation.
It is more stable and done right.
It leads to a deeper intimacy.
Nowadays, it has been destroyed by the hookup culture.
The last generation that did monogamy successfully was the greatest generation.
Relationships have not evolve so much.
It´s more feminism and romantisism, that made "the one it is" and "solemate" myth up in the last 50years.
Women want men, but they don´t need them anymore.
So never listen to women, when they talk about relationships and what that want. Just look who women sle+p with and who get divorced (even Tom Brady as a Beta Chad).
The Rational Male The Godfather of the redpill. He changed so many lives of men for the better.
God bless him
The rise of casual dating has definitely made intimacy a more complicated issue for younger generations.
Casual dating is a mix of feminism and human being’s natural proclivity to resort to their default sexual behaviours. Men want to spread the seed (casual dating), and women want the best option (branch swinging, cheating on betas with alphas). When women don’t need security from betas anymore, what do women want to pursue? The exact alphas who don’t want to commit/stick around. Hence, the modern dating market.
Rollo was dropping GEMS 💎 of truth
Great talk guys. Thank you. 👍💪👊💯
It’s interesting how plate spinning is now a way to avoid emotional attachment in dating.
Women are natural plate spinners.
Always fire info when Rolo is on deck.💯🔥💪🏽📕
My dad needed this book he is talking about. He committed suicide in his mid 50s
wtf
The way tech influences dating today really shifts the whole idea of intimacy and connection.
Tech provides buffers against rejection for men. And tech makes it easier for women to optimize hypergamy.
I was excited about this discussion, now I know the full explanation of what we really and truly understand about sex.
"You were not supposed to know that" - said during a live, freely accessible RUclips conversation.
I would like to see anyone get hungry and chase down their prey. I don't think we are designed to eat animals. We would eat some fruits and veggies we gathered or are growing.
false that's just your cuckmindset
Rolo’s perspective on dating and abundance really challenges traditional views on relationships.
I want to try to read the written text in your book, where can I buy it, is it publicly available?
Amazon. Rational Male. There are 5 books in the series. The first two are the most useful.
I‘ve read all 5 and yes first, second and the last one „players handbook“are the most important one. But i have to recommend all of them, he has done the lords work and changed my life for the better years ago.
he also has a website where you can find essays on what he has written in his books.
in this generation does anyone still believe in soulmate?
"Typical" is a more helpful word than "Average" . Because it emphasizes it is not a slur against a man's quality but an indication of common demographic traits.
Because regardless of what level the NET TOTAL QUALITY of every-man on the planet is, women will still only WANT to pick from the top 20% of those men.
e..g. the Quality of Life (home, food basics etc) of the "typical" man now in the USA is better than a man living in the 1700.
AND if you teleported women from the 1700 directly into the apartment of a "typical" man, she would think he was living like a king, (a heated shower alone is something kings could only dream of), and she would dream of living her life with him in his home . . . . until she walked out the door, and saw the quality of life of the men in the top 20%.
And despite the fact 2 minutes ago, she thought living with him was a DREAM come true, she would then instantly not consider him any more as a life partner, and instead she would WANT to be with a top 20% man.
Whether or not she COULD get with a top 20% is irrelevant - she would still WANT to be with one of them. She might be with a typical man in the lower 80% out of necessity, but her WANT to be with another man is still there, which she will act upon that want if given the opportunity.
Its also why telling men to "do better" misunderstands female nature. Because if EVERYMAN doubled his "value" over night, it would not change a thing, the top 20% men would still be the same top 20% men.
It's more helpful to realize that women do not want most men (the typical man) when a man is considering where to put his focus in life.
Your camera settings are quite distracting. Your focal length is too long for the set. Bring it down to a 35-50mm and it will look better.
Algo
I was surprised at the sexual market place, is there something like this?😂
You're literally in it...