@@studiolab24academy55 XDR stands for Extreme Dynamic Range, it's just the "Apple way" to describe a really good HDR. The maximum declared peak is 1600nits on MacBook Pro XDR screens.
@@niccolorizzi7055 sheesh 1k6, that's crazy, if only Apple can produce monitors for gaming/production purpose. I recently bought a hdr 1k miniled monitor, and it already looks awesome in HDR
1600 NITS test video for MacBook Pro XDR displays (if temp is lower than 82 F / 28 C, over that 1000 NITS is the max) ruclips.net/video/7ohUPtyG1S4/видео.htmlsi=w3ZhKD7k-4r6uc6N
This video is excellent to show the logarithmic way our eyes perceive brightness. Obviously room dependent, but the higher you go the less the perceived differences are. The jump from 400 to 600 feels particularly big, 600 to 800 is significant, but 800 to 1000 is definitely subtler.
That's because you probably don't have true HDR, or no HDR at all. HDR-400 certification is not HDR. Watch it on a TV/monitor with at least HDR-1000 certification, then you will only notice the difference.
@@maciejwyzgowski Most modern flagship phones can do those numbers and higher for HDR content. Phone screens are pound for pound the best OLED screens out there on a technical level.
@@noidsuper Okay, never mind. I just checked - no phone is HDR-1000 certified because their screens are simply too weak, and besides, they run on battery power. My phone also has 1200 nits, and even 1700 at peak, and its HDR can suck. I repeat - if you watch this video on a monitor with real HDR you will only notice the difference.
Got a 1000 nits mini LED HDR monitor (M27t20) and god that 1000nits full white window looks insane. In a normally lit room, it became eye squintly bright. I love it
@@flxdrv5020 Oleds (qd from samsung or mla from LG) hit easily 1,5-2k nits now, which is very decent brightness as of now. Especially when you have jet blacks and infinite contrast. However, mini leds will never have proper black levels no matter how many those shitty dimming zones you would have. There is no HDR without switching off individual pixels. You can cope with brightness story, but the truth is you can not have an HDR with gray black levels - sooooorry! And oleds brightness goes up with each generation
@@flxdrv5020 For now, tandem OLED is insanely good and currently 1000 nits full screen is possible, so it will likely change soon once monitors and TVs use that. I’m using an iPad Pro with that rn so I know how good it looks.
That's awesome - thank you for this test! I was able to achieve between 800 and 1000 nits on my LG C2 42-inch TV. It would seem that LG has fixed a lot of the early issues with the auto brightness algorithm. The 42-inch C2 is now able to achieve previously unattainable HDR brightness levels.
This is not a laboratory test but it can give us the ability to view the maximum luminance of the display. Many manufacturers declare maximum nits but it should be understood under what conditions.
Tone mapping. Just because you see a difference between 800 and 1000 nits doesn’t mean it’s really shown. Almost every TV has tone mapping built in which scales down the top end. So 800 was likely shown at 600. And 1000 was shown at 650.
@@DrWNoLs Yes, all screens will fail some of these tests. ~ 1400nit FALD screens and 2000+ nit ones (though those 2k+ ones currently suffer ABL) will compress the top end less, or not at all depending on the screen and whether it's hdr1000, hdr4000, or hdr10,000 material - but it will fail some of the bloom tests and even when not outright blooming it will be toning and blending all of the large backlight cells, at best a 45x25 "lighting resolution" .. dropping the contrast and black depth in the surrounding zones toning them brighter, and dimming other masses of pixels in large 7000pixel zones and surrounding zone cells of 7k pixels each. On mixed dim/dark scenes, which is most scenes .. the affected zones fall back to 5000:1 contrast ratio and the accompanying black depths even on the better ~ 1300 zone FALD screens we have currently. So tradeoffs either way FALD vs OLED but FALD will get way brighter HDR peaks and have longer sustained. brighter 50% and 100% screen (though most scenes are more mixed than that) - while oled will be darkened side by side pixel by pixel next to colorful pixels to a razor's edge.
@Studiolab24 Academy The g7 is a great monitor but has awful blooming and you can see the backlight zones shifting. The oled has no blooming or halo effects at all
this was great, BUT I can see my monitor doesnt get brighter after 600 nits, so I would have really like to see more accuracy so that I could pin point were it stop getting brighter. great video .
Running this (or any other HDR test) in Chrome or Brave on a Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra doesn't display any HDR effect (simultaneously watching on my Pixel 8 Pro where everything works flawlessly in Brave). I already set the color profile flag to force HDR, didn't help either. Any ideas?
On the RUclips app, the tab s9 ultra should play in HDR. But..remember. The full screen nits of the s9 series is only 400nits. Only the 1% tests, will get the 1000 nits. Its an extremely average screen sadly, and why I sold mine.
Why is this video HLG? Because of this, the actual brightness we see is going to depend on how our displays are configured. Surely PQ should be used for a video like this...
It's because of tonemapping. Your display adjusts the HDR content to fit within whatever the maximum luminance of your display is, which in your case would be 600 nits. Simplified example of tonemapping on a 600 nits display: - 100 nits source, 60 nits output - 500 nits source, 300 nits output - 1000 nits source, 600 nits output
My screen stop increasing brightness in 400 nits but is a 600 nits screen with true black hdr certification, that means the screen has an issue? my laptop is a vivobook pro 15 oled
This is nothing compared to what Samsung has. Btw your iPhone has Samsung display panel which is little downgraded to what they use in their own devices.
@@anilnemani5205 still produced by SM and maximum brightness about 2000 nits is automated, only in full sun. So you cannot reach 2000 nits in HDR, coz its peak only for a few seconds limited to not burn the display. Maximum manual brightness is what counts in HDR.
but how come samsung let its competitor have 2000 nits brightness and they still stuck at 1750 nits.When the display manufacturer is samsung @@theonewhoknows338
I noticed way too much jitter on samsung oleds. Idk why but i tried on my phones s23 and iphone 15 pro the jitter is not as bad but on samsung flaghip oled tvs the jitter is just disgusting tested the vid on a s90c and s95c besides that i tested this video on a lg g3 and its perfectly smooth. Can someone ecplain why samsung displays just suck at motion?
My s95 is the same, I do notice it has trouble with fast movement in general. I tried various settings but never sorted it. Very disappointed tbh, I paid a lot more to have the qd oled which looks fantastic as long as there is no movement 😂😂😂 Did you ever figure out any fix?
I have samsung s21 ultra why does my screen in the blooming test like flashes. I mean the text when it moves too quickly seems to be flashing. Could it be because of the oled screen? I also tried to put the screen in 120hz mode but it didnt change
That sounds like pixel response time to me. Pixel response being the time it takes for it to shift from a color to another color; black to white and back to black is quite a challenge
My oled C7 specs state the TV reaches max 700 nits. During the test on this video, (0-1000 nits text), the screen reaches 700nits. 👍🏼, However, on the (0-1000 full screen) test, my screen only reached 200nits. Is this normal? Or has my oled screen degraded?
yes, that is a tradeoff of OLED. It has lower sustained (durations) of some windows, and it has lower brightness at larger (50%, 100%) of screen. It also kicks in abl when brighter scenes are more static/stationary for longer. However in real world use, most scenes are heavily mixed with dark areas in bright ones, and bright areas in dark ones. The dolby vision mastering engineers do something like typical scene at 50% of screen 100nit +/- , 25% at 100nit to 1000nit, and 25% of the screen at 1000nit to 10,000nit . . The bottom half of your screen maps 1:1 for the most part and the top half takes what is remaining and compresses (tone maps) it down into the top end of your screen as best it can but it is subject to those % windows and duration limitations. However - - - all screens will fail some of these tests. ~ 1400nit FALD screens and 2000+ nit ones (though those 2k+ ones currently suffer ABL) will compress the top end less, or not at all depending on the screen and whether it's hdr1000, hdr4000, or hdr10,000 material - but it will fail some of the bloom tests and even when not outright blooming it will be toning and blending all of the large backlight cells, at best a 45x25 "lighting resolution" .. dropping the contrast and black depth in the surrounding zones toning them brighter, and dimming other masses of pixels in large 7000pixel zones and surrounding zone cells of 7k pixels each. On mixed dim/dark scenes, which is most scenes .. the affected zones fall back to 5000:1 contrast ratio and the accompanying black depths even on the better ~ 1300 zone FALD screens we have currently. So tradeoffs either way FALD vs OLED but FALD will get way brighter HDR peaks and have longer sustained. brighter 50% and 100% screen (though most scenes are more mixed than that) - while oled will be darkened side by side pixel by pixel next to colorful pixels to a razor's edge.
Might be something with personal settings maybe? Local dimming or maybe some add on settings. I noticed on mine on some of them it didn’t cap it, but the local dimming made it so the 800 nits was brought up to 1000 nits.
It doesn't, The 1000 nits window looks brighter than the 800 and the 800 looks brighter than the 600. Might be comming from your display not achieving 800+nits
Hi admin can u explain to me. I use Mi Pad 5. I can only see difference between nits 0-600 i cant find difference above 600 nits in this video. What is this mean? My screen nits peak is 600 nit?
holy crap, my xiaomi 12 turbo. omg, OLED is INSANE it has ab12 bit OLED panel, only when I watch HDR content it reach it max peak brightness, and damn is brighter than my own light bulb
weird. LG C7 whole screen brightness. 200 nits is brighter than 400 nits. i assume it maxes at 300 nits? then somehow shifts back down to 200 range?? small window does reach about 800 nits.
i think my monitor got some kind of false HDR? when i activate it, everything looks the same, just more desaturated colors and also looks kinda more blueish
You need to enable HDR in windows, and also in your monitors OSD. The monitor OSD (onscreen display) is what shows up when you push the buttons on the bottom, or back of the monitor. Enable HDR in that menu as well, and it should work properly.
у меня монитор 300 нит заявленых имеет. но я вижу разницу между 600 и 800 на этом ролике. почему? проверял так же на амолед телефоне. разницу между 800 и 1000 вижу.
Думаю внушение.. из за оно что цифра на экране обновляется экран моргает в этот момент и кажется что стало ярче, я таким же Макаром вижу разницу на мониторе в 240нит и на телефоне 550нит и 400,600,800,1000 хотя я думаю разницы уже нет 😊
Because the RUclips video doesn't calculate for your particular screen, it just displays a percentage of brightness. 1000 nits isn't 1000 on your display, but 625. Try hunting down a proper HDR test video on the web to download and run it locally, that will be the "real" test
0-200 nits is the range of SDR content, HDR usually lifts the black levels though, which is supposed to be a selling point since you can see more in the dark since the range of brightness is expanded so that they don't have to be pitch black in order to convey darkness, they can instead be dimly lit.
It's very strange... I have Gigabyte G34WQC with max peak 350 nits brightness, and my eyes can catch increasing brightness up to 600 nits, after it no sense The verdict is the Gigabyte wrote the wrong value of brightness or this test is wrong
the test is fine. I have a M1 MBP, and it has HDR peak brightness of 1600 nits, and sustains it at around 1300 nits. I could easily detect the scale from 400 - 600 - 800 - 1000. I think it's capable of even more, so the video is fine (had to squint the eyes at 1000 nits, sheesh)
@-EcchiGuy Bro i own a lg 27gr95qe-b with 240hz, 1000 nits and hdr10+ also i doubt that the panel of my samsung galaxy s24 plus which is a advanced dynamic amoled is some crappy stuff. It actually got 2600 nits. Hdr is in the windows display settings on, the mentioned settings in my browser too.
Good evening, jm italian and j have samusung AU7100 4khdr crystal UHD 55 (EU55AU7170UXZT) its possible have a right calibration and setting for this tv for hd amd 4k a 4kgdr? Thanks for the help
AOC mini led monitor (Q27G3xmn) don`t get jump from 600 nit but it has vesa hdr1000 and iphone 14 pro max has all jumps. 1000 nit this video gets 1600 nit on iphone screen. 600nit from this video get 1200nit to AOC monitor i check it with my luxmeter i play this on macbook pro 15 and it take all levels nits but screen macbook not hdr . This test fake
Well. In a dark room at night right now. 0 nits my screen was black with just the words lit up saying “0 nits”. With a non oled, rhe screen would ge graish/glowing even while showing black. Every step made a noticeable difference. At my lowest brightness setting on my phone, i had to point the phone away from my face as the nits increased when it was a white background. On my old phone, it just looked like an old backlit normal tv/phone screen.
A true HDR enabled video, finally!
if anyone watching this on a PC make sure to turn on hardware acceleration in the browser settings for the HDR to work
Dude you are a hero
And you are zero @@dylanragon
god damn, this really shows off the range of the new macbook pro XDR screens
If you watch on SDR display you can’t see hdr. On hdr display you can see what is max luminance capacity.
@@studiolab24academy55 XDR stands for Extreme Dynamic Range, it's just the "Apple way" to describe a really good HDR. The maximum declared peak is 1600nits on MacBook Pro XDR screens.
@@niccolorizzi7055 exactly how i was using this vid haha, and DAMN this gets bright, 1000nits isnt even the brightest its 1600 nits!!
@@niccolorizzi7055 sheesh 1k6, that's crazy, if only Apple can produce monitors for gaming/production purpose. I recently bought a hdr 1k miniled monitor, and it already looks awesome in HDR
1600 NITS test video for MacBook Pro XDR displays (if temp is lower than 82 F / 28 C, over that 1000 NITS is the max)
ruclips.net/video/7ohUPtyG1S4/видео.htmlsi=w3ZhKD7k-4r6uc6N
Test eseguito! Bravo Stefano!
Anche il brano ha il suo perche’
This video is excellent to show the logarithmic way our eyes perceive brightness. Obviously room dependent, but the higher you go the less the perceived differences are. The jump from 400 to 600 feels particularly big, 600 to 800 is significant, but 800 to 1000 is definitely subtler.
That's because you probably don't have true HDR, or no HDR at all. HDR-400 certification is not HDR. Watch it on a TV/monitor with at least HDR-1000 certification, then you will only notice the difference.
@ My phone can pull around 1200 nits max brightness.
@@noidsuper Please specify the model of this phone.
@@maciejwyzgowski Most modern flagship phones can do those numbers and higher for HDR content. Phone screens are pound for pound the best OLED screens out there on a technical level.
@@noidsuper Okay, never mind. I just checked - no phone is HDR-1000 certified because their screens are simply too weak, and besides, they run on battery power. My phone also has 1200 nits, and even 1700 at peak, and its HDR can suck. I repeat - if you watch this video on a monitor with real HDR you will only notice the difference.
Got a 1000 nits mini LED HDR monitor (M27t20) and god that 1000nits full white window looks insane. In a normally lit room, it became eye squintly bright. I love it
My eyes were watering just doing the test on my new Coolermaster Tempest monitor (the 4k model).
mini led and HDR... Please choose one
@@MaartenVaanThomm it's both :). oled could never get to the brightness of mini led
@@flxdrv5020 Oleds (qd from samsung or mla from LG) hit easily 1,5-2k nits now, which is very decent brightness as of now. Especially when you have jet blacks and infinite contrast.
However, mini leds will never have proper black levels no matter how many those shitty dimming zones you would have. There is no HDR without switching off individual pixels. You can cope with brightness story, but the truth is you can not have an HDR with gray black levels - sooooorry! And oleds brightness goes up with each generation
@@flxdrv5020 For now, tandem OLED is insanely good and currently 1000 nits full screen is possible, so it will likely change soon once monitors and TVs use that. I’m using an iPad Pro with that rn so I know how good it looks.
Watched at 2x playback speed, full brightness, the colours are actually quite enjoyable 🎨🌈
is there a diff viewing at normal vs 2x? for testing
@Oskar-o2d Watching at 2x speed was simply to get through the video quicker whilst still testing adequately.
Uhm...Can we get a video that reaches 2k nits please?
true
That's awesome - thank you for this test! I was able to achieve between 800 and 1000 nits on my LG C2 42-inch TV. It would seem that LG has fixed a lot of the early issues with the auto brightness algorithm. The 42-inch C2 is now able to achieve previously unattainable HDR brightness levels.
This is not a laboratory test but it can give us the ability to view the maximum luminance of the display. Many manufacturers declare maximum nits but it should be understood under what conditions.
Tone mapping. Just because you see a difference between 800 and 1000 nits doesn’t mean it’s really shown. Almost every TV has tone mapping built in which scales down the top end. So 800 was likely shown at 600. And 1000 was shown at 650.
@@DrWNoLs Yes, all screens will fail some of these tests. ~ 1400nit FALD screens and 2000+ nit ones (though those 2k+ ones currently suffer ABL) will compress the top end less, or not at all depending on the screen and whether it's hdr1000, hdr4000, or hdr10,000 material - but it will fail some of the bloom tests and even when not outright blooming it will be toning and blending all of the large backlight cells, at best a 45x25 "lighting resolution" .. dropping the contrast and black depth in the surrounding zones toning them brighter, and dimming other masses of pixels in large 7000pixel zones and surrounding zone cells of 7k pixels each. On mixed dim/dark scenes, which is most scenes .. the affected zones fall back to 5000:1 contrast ratio and the accompanying black depths even on the better ~ 1300 zone FALD screens we have currently. So tradeoffs either way FALD vs OLED but FALD will get way brighter HDR peaks and have longer sustained. brighter 50% and 100% screen (though most scenes are more mixed than that) - while oled will be darkened side by side pixel by pixel next to colorful pixels to a razor's edge.
What you saw at full screen on your C2 was closer to 200nits not 1000.
@@RH-nk7eo true lmao
Any way to download this video? My Apple TV (first gen) RUclips app does not support HDR
try "4k download" software.
thank u! good to know my HDR monitor is working grreat!
why is the difference still visible when i turn off the HDR setting on my pc?
Great video . The blooming test difference between my Samsung G7 and LG OLED are night and day...
What is better?
@Studiolab24 Academy The g7 is a great monitor but has awful blooming and you can see the backlight zones shifting. The oled has no blooming or halo effects at all
Sure!
@@studiolab24academy55 im thinking of buying the neo g9. Is it good?
@@unknown185 I do not know this model but LG G1 or LG C1 are the best choice now.
this was great, BUT I can see my monitor doesnt get brighter after 600 nits, so I would have really like to see more accuracy so that I could pin point were it stop getting brighter. great video .
its probably HDR600 since thats the highest certification after HDR400 and before HDR1000
How I use this video, the output changed to HLG
Yes, RUclips is HLG.
@@videotraining1668 RUclips supports PQ as well. It's strange that this video is HLG.
Running this (or any other HDR test) in Chrome or Brave on a Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra doesn't display any HDR effect (simultaneously watching on my Pixel 8 Pro where everything works flawlessly in Brave). I already set the color profile flag to force HDR, didn't help either. Any ideas?
On the RUclips app, the tab s9 ultra should play in HDR. But..remember. The full screen nits of the s9 series is only 400nits. Only the 1% tests, will get the 1000 nits. Its an extremely average screen sadly, and why I sold mine.
Is the 50 nits at 0:33 seconds mislabeled?
It does seem like it should have been 5
thought my monitor blooming, nope, its my glasses lol
Why is this video HLG? Because of this, the actual brightness we see is going to depend on how our displays are configured. Surely PQ should be used for a video like this...
Why on my hdr600 display i can see difference between 1000 and 600 nits. Seems like test make wrong way
It's because of tonemapping. Your display adjusts the HDR content to fit within whatever the maximum luminance of your display is, which in your case would be 600 nits.
Simplified example of tonemapping on a 600 nits display:
- 100 nits source, 60 nits output
- 500 nits source, 300 nits output
- 1000 nits source, 600 nits output
1:35 when it says "nits" the name flickers and the borders are rainbow, only happens on my tv (samsung 43QN90D)
What can it be?
I have the same monitor/tv and it does not show that neither in PC mode or using YT through Tizen in various image modes.
@@Boorz01 oof, im lucky on being unlucky then
My screen stop increasing brightness in 400 nits but is a 600 nits screen with true black hdr certification, that means the screen has an issue? my laptop is a vivobook pro 15 oled
Nevermind, i didnt have bright at max, when in full brightness i can see the difference between 400 and 600
Good video
I just god blind XD
Nice test BTW!!
This video is super bright on my iPhone 11 Pro Max especially that 1000 nits
This is nothing compared to what Samsung has. Btw your iPhone has Samsung display panel which is little downgraded to what they use in their own devices.
@@munnumkhalid well now iPhone 14 pro series is the brightest display in the mobile industry going up to 2000 nits which is insane
@@anilnemani5205 still produced by SM and maximum brightness about 2000 nits is automated, only in full sun. So you cannot reach 2000 nits in HDR, coz its peak only for a few seconds limited to not burn the display. Maximum manual brightness is what counts in HDR.
looks way better on my 14 pro max
but how come samsung let its competitor have 2000 nits brightness and they still stuck at 1750 nits.When the display manufacturer is samsung @@theonewhoknows338
I noticed way too much jitter on samsung oleds. Idk why but i tried on my phones s23 and iphone 15 pro the jitter is not as bad but on samsung flaghip oled tvs the jitter is just disgusting tested the vid on a s90c and s95c besides that i tested this video on a lg g3 and its perfectly smooth. Can someone ecplain why samsung displays just suck at motion?
My s95 is the same, I do notice it has trouble with fast movement in general.
I tried various settings but never sorted it.
Very disappointed tbh, I paid a lot more to have the qd oled which looks fantastic as long as there is no movement 😂😂😂
Did you ever figure out any fix?
@@FlyingFun. not really you can lower the jitter effect by changing display modes. on "film" (movie setting) its the worst amongst them all
I have samsung s21 ultra why does my screen in the blooming test like flashes. I mean the text when it moves too quickly seems to be flashing. Could it be because of the oled screen? I also tried to put the screen in 120hz mode but it didnt change
That sounds like pixel response time to me. Pixel response being the time it takes for it to shift from a color to another color; black to white and back to black is quite a challenge
@@SageRites I also think its because the video is at a low frame rate
It's because this video is at 30fps. It's not a screen issue.
If I watched for a longer time this little square running everywhere, I wouldn't need a screen support HDR
So the 600 nits good enough for better hdr content/gaming 400 is the lowest we should go for and not for 300
I have a slight difference between 800 and 1000 nits which is probably 10 nits. So my max brightness is somewhere 810 nits which is neat.
@@jfbbridurnfbbfbbhhvggghvfkhfuj what is your display brand and model no.
So we ned 800 nits 1000nits is over spending 💰
@@KhuniBacha I live in Russia, Ufa. The brand is Samsung SyncMaster 152v.
@@KhuniBacha I don't know. but 400, 600, 800 is still good.
Tab s9 1000 nits full screen? I think this test doesn't work... I expect it to reach at maximum 600 nits from what I've seen on tests
Nah it's Samsung problem their display crush blacks and nowhere calibrated like Apple iPads.
@@jaimem1788 lmao
how do I know my phone's nits?
how do yk whats is the higfhest amount of nits you can have my laptop support 1200 nits puresight display hdr
My oled C7 specs state the TV reaches max 700 nits. During the test on this video, (0-1000 nits text), the screen reaches 700nits. 👍🏼, However, on the (0-1000 full screen) test, my screen only reached 200nits. Is this normal? Or has my oled screen degraded?
yes, that is a tradeoff of OLED. It has lower sustained (durations) of some windows, and it has lower brightness at larger (50%, 100%) of screen. It also kicks in abl when brighter scenes are more static/stationary for longer.
However in real world use, most scenes are heavily mixed with dark areas in bright ones, and bright areas in dark ones. The dolby vision mastering engineers do something like typical scene at 50% of screen 100nit +/- , 25% at 100nit to 1000nit, and 25% of the screen at 1000nit to 10,000nit . . The bottom half of your screen maps 1:1 for the most part and the top half takes what is remaining and compresses (tone maps) it down into the top end of your screen as best it can but it is subject to those % windows and duration limitations.
However - - - all screens will fail some of these tests. ~ 1400nit FALD screens and 2000+ nit ones (though those 2k+ ones currently suffer ABL) will compress the top end less, or not at all depending on the screen and whether it's hdr1000, hdr4000, or hdr10,000 material - but it will fail some of the bloom tests and even when not outright blooming it will be toning and blending all of the large backlight cells, at best a 45x25 "lighting resolution" .. dropping the contrast and black depth in the surrounding zones toning them brighter, and dimming other masses of pixels in large 7000pixel zones and surrounding zone cells of 7k pixels each. On mixed dim/dark scenes, which is most scenes .. the affected zones fall back to 5000:1 contrast ratio and the accompanying black depths even on the better ~ 1300 zone FALD screens we have currently. So tradeoffs either way FALD vs OLED but FALD will get way brighter HDR peaks and have longer sustained. brighter 50% and 100% screen (though most scenes are more mixed than that) - while oled will be darkened side by side pixel by pixel next to colorful pixels to a razor's edge.
Does youtube even display hdr video?
Yes, but you need HDR device or HDR tv.
Why though the video caps the brightness at 600-800 nits while clearly in my hdr10+ display, it still is grey, far from maximum brightness?
Might be something with personal settings maybe? Local dimming or maybe some add on settings. I noticed on mine on some of them it didn’t cap it, but the local dimming made it so the 800 nits was brought up to 1000 nits.
It doesn't, The 1000 nits window looks brighter than the 800 and the 800 looks brighter than the 600. Might be comming from your display not achieving 800+nits
this isnt HDR though, its not in the settings
Can someone tell the source music used in background? The music is awesome.
Poderoso AUDIO SUBLIMINAL - 5 MINUTOS🥰⏳ para VOLVER A TI Y ENFOCARTE EN PAZ
ruclips.net/video/zxyWLF9FcNo/видео.html
Can’t tell if my screen is blooming or just my eyes
Hi, can anyone tell me should I go with 300 nits or 500 nits gaming laptop ??
more nits better experience
The video is off. You count down from 50 to 10 and it gets brighter. Then it goes to 100, which is probably what the erroneous "10" was meant to say.
Yes, this a small error but the test works in all others steps.
Compared an old s8 to the new Xperia 1 v and wow, display tech sure has changed a lot over the years.
Nice I don’t need a studio light anymore
I have a Macbook pro 16 inch m3 max, and I cant see diference between 800 to 1000 nits, I even try with vivid pro, and nothing
Can you tell us how it was delivered to YT?
H265 10 bit
Hi admin can u explain to me. I use Mi Pad 5.
I can only see difference between nits 0-600 i cant find difference above 600 nits in this video.
What is this mean? My screen nits peak is 600 nit?
Yes.
Only the iPad Pro 12.9 inch goes up to 1000 nits and let me tell you there is a noticeable difference from my last iPad and this new one
@@tnterror8085 I can vouch for the same. The iPad Pro 12.9 is the ultimate media center. The screen is just amazing.
holy crap, my xiaomi 12 turbo. omg, OLED is INSANE it has ab12 bit OLED panel, only when I watch HDR content it reach it max peak brightness, and damn is brighter than my own light bulb
it's great!!!
weird. LG C7 whole screen brightness.
200 nits is brighter than 400 nits. i assume it maxes at 300 nits? then somehow shifts back down to 200 range??
small window does reach about 800 nits.
i think my monitor got some kind of false HDR? when i activate it, everything looks the same, just more desaturated colors and also looks kinda more blueish
make sure all the HDR settings are enabled in windows.
maybe you have a very cheap light HDR
You need to enable HDR in windows, and also in your monitors OSD. The monitor OSD (onscreen display) is what shows up when you push the buttons on the bottom, or back of the monitor. Enable HDR in that menu as well, and it should work properly.
guys i think i just looked at a mini 27" sun during the full screen 1000 nits...
у меня монитор 300 нит заявленых имеет. но я вижу разницу между 600 и 800 на этом ролике. почему?
проверял так же на амолед телефоне. разницу между 800 и 1000 вижу.
Думаю внушение.. из за оно что цифра на экране обновляется экран моргает в этот момент и кажется что стало ярче, я таким же Макаром вижу разницу на мониторе в 240нит и на телефоне 550нит и 400,600,800,1000 хотя я думаю разницы уже нет 😊
@@GalkinFlash я уже во всем разобрался. И даже запилил часовой ролик про HDR :)
Осталось его загрузить и пока не получается из-за интернета
1000nits is painfully bright on the CoolerMaster Tempest GP27Q
lmao, 1000 nits full screen made my room look like the lights were on
although in my display it was closer to 600~700 nits
My iPhone that has 625 nitts got brighter at the 800 and the 1000 nitts test 💀
Because the RUclips video doesn't calculate for your particular screen, it just displays a percentage of brightness. 1000 nits isn't 1000 on your display, but 625. Try hunting down a proper HDR test video on the web to download and run it locally, that will be the "real" test
lol. And people say HDR is too dark. Heck. Even 100 nits (which is SDR) is super bright.
0-200 nits is the range of SDR content, HDR usually lifts the black levels though, which is supposed to be a selling point since you can see more in the dark since the range of brightness is expanded so that they don't have to be pitch black in order to convey darkness, they can instead be dimly lit.
¿anyone else spoted dimishing returns after 600 nits ?
It's very strange... I have Gigabyte G34WQC with max peak 350 nits brightness, and my eyes can catch increasing brightness up to 600 nits, after it no sense
The verdict is the Gigabyte wrote the wrong value of brightness or this test is wrong
the test is fine. I have a M1 MBP, and it has HDR peak brightness of 1600 nits, and sustains it at around 1300 nits. I could easily detect the scale from 400 - 600 - 800 - 1000. I think it's capable of even more, so the video is fine (had to squint the eyes at 1000 nits, sheesh)
i see no brightness difference between 800 and 1000 nits, neither on my lg oled monitor nor on my s24 plus, anyone could explain that to me?
@-EcchiGuy
Bro i own a lg 27gr95qe-b with 240hz, 1000 nits and hdr10+ also i doubt that the panel of my samsung galaxy s24 plus which is a advanced dynamic amoled is some crappy stuff. It actually got 2600 nits. Hdr is in the windows display settings on, the mentioned settings in my browser too.
My eyes have burn in now
sharp r5g runs perfectly
Good evening, jm italian and j have samusung AU7100 4khdr crystal UHD 55 (EU55AU7170UXZT) its possible have a right calibration and setting for this tv for hd amd 4k a 4kgdr? Thanks for the help
Ciao Fulvio, write to me in pvt. studiolab24academy[at]gmail.com . I’m Italian too.
I'm watching this video from Poco X6 Pro 5G with 1800 nits screen.
It needs PQ not HLG
200 nits laptop seems fine ...😮
My mi 11 lite suport max 600 nits
I am not sure this test really work, considering I see big difference between 600 and 800nits on a old SDR monitor.
This test must be view only on HDR monitor. If you have an SDR monitor RUclips show video in SDR
1000 nits on my 22 Moto Edge literally lit up my whole room, it's insane! Brighter than the flashlight on it! Apparently can reach 1300 nits
shit i only get 600 nits max on my FO48U OLED
Brown Charles Hernandez Angela Martinez Joseph
Wow I am surprise that my HUAWEI MateView GT can achieve 600nits!
Watching on Realme GT 6T🙂
1000 nita on my poco x4 GT (ips)
I need 4500 nits for my phone
Garcia John Allen Michelle Rodriguez Angela
Thx to this video i know my Screen has 800Nits but no HDR XD
KIVI 55U740LB 600 nits выше разницы нету
AOC mini led monitor (Q27G3xmn) don`t get jump from 600 nit but it has vesa hdr1000
and iphone 14 pro max has all jumps. 1000 nit this video gets 1600 nit on iphone screen. 600nit from this video get 1200nit to AOC monitor
i check it with my luxmeter
i play this on macbook pro 15 and it take all levels nits but screen macbook not hdr . This test fake
That's just a small percent
You need to go above 5000nits
My display has 6k nits
1.6k normally
oppo the Daniel oppo has the 1000 nits bright
Damn, my Samsung Galaxy s12 goes to 1000 nits
My monitor can brighten up to 1000nits and its rated at 600nits does that mean my monitor can produce 1000nit HDR even though its rated at 600 nits?
This video is not in HDR!!!
ACER makes the best damn displays lol
This doesnt work. Its just a video increasing brightness "in" video
I don’t get your point. This test means nothing.
Play this video on your phone, your TV, and different monitors. I can guarantee you that each one will look like you're watching a different video.
Well. In a dark room at night right now. 0 nits my screen was black with just the words lit up saying “0 nits”. With a non oled, rhe screen would ge graish/glowing even while showing black. Every step made a noticeable difference. At my lowest brightness setting on my phone, i had to point the phone away from my face as the nits increased when it was a white background.
On my old phone, it just looked like an old backlit normal tv/phone screen.
Fake. My asus vg279ql1a it has 400 nit according to the passport, and clearly displays all 1000 in the video.
My phone screen is more brighter lol
Daddy has a Porsche
ruclips.net/video/Pjvv2Hnw8Tw/видео.htmlsi=R16Z9dwUChHWw9Ap
For display quality test