My go to Channel when I want to impress my friends with the quality of my TV 😅😅 the main reason is that your content is not oversaturated like most of the 8 K 12 K 16K fake stuff.... You're the best and I've seen them all. 🙋🇨🇦
Si on a l'écran qu'il faut, on peut petit à petit exercer son regard à un point qu'on voit la différence au bout d'un certain temps. Il y a bien bien des réalisateurs qu'ils réalisent ces films, alors pourquoi nous, en tant que spectateur nous ne pourrions pas améliorer notre regard. Merci pour ce partage.🔥💯
Cinema when it went from analog film to digital was 2K at its first iteration. Never had seen anyone complaining about a bad image on the first 2K digital cinema screens. 4K equals 8 million individual pixels and most people already have a hard time to make out the difference between a two or eight million pixel image if a suitable distance to the image is a given, say distance couch to projector screen or TV display panel. 8K doesn't make sense due to the limitations of a human eye. 12K? Come on now, stop trolling.
It's a complete waste of money. These people must be working for Samsung or LG the way they push this nonsense. 8K will never be a thing as long as our human vision is what it is.
@@billanten7862 It actually depends on the device and bandwidth. Not all devices and displays can view 4320p, so that option may not show up for everyone. Also, manually selecting a specific resolution on the YT mobile app is only available to members of their paid premium subscription. Open this on your phone and see.
This demo would look good in 1080p. Not a convincing argument. A 65" 8K display resolves at 2'1", so unless your knees are mashed against the TV, your eyes are literally incapable of discerning 4k of pixels from 8k. Stop trying to make 8K a thing.
@@Nathan_diaz518 Wrong. You fell for a marketing gimmick. There are established data and reference charts. Brandi Viewing Distance calculator shows the Visual Acuity Distance for an individual with 20/20 vision viewing an 85” diagonal screen at 8K UHD resolution is 2.9 ft. Farther than that and the pixels resolve. According to viewing distance standards from THX and the Society of Motion Picture & Television Engineers (SMPTE), the viewing distance necessary for an individual with 20/20 vision to discern the difference between 4K and 8K for a 16:9, 150 ft screen is 5 feet. Farther than that and the pixels resolve. You can pretend the organic limitations of human vision don't apply to you, but that would be false. Zero chance your magical eyeballs resolve at 10 feet away. More likely is artificial image enhancements are being applied to the image at 8K and not 4k, and/or poor quality downscaling for images at non-native resolutions (under 8K). This is definitely a you problem, since you flushed your money down the toilet for a placebo effect.
@@Nathan_diaz518 TigerGreene is right. Look up an article called 8K Will Never Be a Thing, Stop Trying to Make it a Thing. Human eyes can't see that many tiny pixels that far away. The whole thing is made to sell more tv sets.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
This looks so cinematic. ❤
Magnifique. Belle réalisation.🔥💯
Thank you 🙏
Stunning video!
Glad you liked it!
Thank you for the excellent 16:9 full screen video experience Eugene.Much appreciated 👊
Thanks for watching! 🙏
My go to Channel when I want to impress my friends with the quality of my TV 😅😅 the main reason is that your content is not oversaturated like most of the 8 K 12 K 16K fake stuff....
You're the best and I've seen them all. 🙋🇨🇦
Still not 8K like promised!
What was happening with the saucer background weird unnatural colourization at 0:55
Nice Video🙌🙌🙌
Thanks 🔥
🤗THANKS EUGENE FOR A GREAT EXPERIENCE 🥶🔥😋💚💚💚
Your videos have the highest quality in all of youtube. RUclips does not support Dolby vision though.
Yet another mind blowing visual feast of a video. Excellent work as always.
Si on a l'écran qu'il faut, on peut petit à petit exercer son regard à un point qu'on voit la différence au bout d'un certain temps. Il y a bien bien des réalisateurs qu'ils réalisent ces films, alors pourquoi nous, en tant que spectateur nous ne pourrions pas améliorer notre regard. Merci pour ce partage.🔥💯
Cinema when it went from analog film to digital was 2K at its first iteration. Never had seen anyone complaining about a bad image on the first 2K digital cinema screens.
4K equals 8 million individual pixels and most people already have a hard time to make out the difference between a two or eight million pixel image if a suitable distance to the image is a given, say distance couch to projector screen or TV display panel. 8K doesn't make sense due to the limitations of a human eye. 12K? Come on now, stop trolling.
It's a complete waste of money. These people must be working for Samsung or LG the way they push this nonsense. 8K will never be a thing as long as our human vision is what it is.
The beauty of this video is just incredible.
worth it? it may be, but good luck finding content especially in this data caps age. Wonderful video though, thanks for sharing.
Your 4k 60 fps is perfect. I see no need for 8k. I can't see the difference.
It depends on your screen and what you’re looking for 😊
@@EugeneBelsky If you're looking for the same exact image if you sit more than 3 feet away, but want to pay 4x more money, then you got it.
Шоколадно!
but the video is 4K
Thanks to RUclips.
@ there are some 8K videos on RUclips still.
This is an 4320p60 video , which means 8k.
@@billanten7862 It actually depends on the device and bandwidth. Not all devices and displays can view 4320p, so that option may not show up for everyone. Also, manually selecting a specific resolution on the YT mobile app is only available to members of their paid premium subscription. Open this on your phone and see.
@@billanten7862 2160p60
Dankeschön für Massage meiner Augen 😊🙏
Bitte!
This demo would look good in 1080p. Not a convincing argument. A 65" 8K display resolves at 2'1", so unless your knees are mashed against the TV, your eyes are literally incapable of discerning 4k of pixels from 8k. Stop trying to make 8K a thing.
That’s a you problem I can clearly see the difference
@@Nathan_diaz518 No kidding? Do you have an 8K display? Which model? What content are you watching in 8K? What distance from the screen are you?
@@TigerGreene a 85QN900D at 10 feet away , almost no content is 8K but it still does upscaling that I can notice
@@Nathan_diaz518 Wrong. You fell for a marketing gimmick. There are established data and reference charts. Brandi Viewing Distance calculator shows the Visual Acuity Distance for an individual with 20/20 vision viewing an 85” diagonal screen at 8K UHD resolution is 2.9 ft. Farther than that and the pixels resolve.
According to viewing distance standards from THX and the Society of Motion Picture & Television Engineers (SMPTE), the viewing distance necessary for an individual with 20/20 vision to discern the difference between 4K and 8K for a 16:9, 150 ft screen is 5 feet. Farther than that and the pixels resolve. You can pretend the organic limitations of human vision don't apply to you, but that would be false. Zero chance your magical eyeballs resolve at 10 feet away. More likely is artificial image enhancements are being applied to the image at 8K and not 4k, and/or poor quality downscaling for images at non-native resolutions (under 8K).
This is definitely a you problem, since you flushed your money down the toilet for a placebo effect.
@@Nathan_diaz518 TigerGreene is right. Look up an article called 8K Will Never Be a Thing, Stop Trying to Make it a Thing. Human eyes can't see that many tiny pixels that far away. The whole thing is made to sell more tv sets.