Romila Thapar: Why Indian History Cannot be Reduced to 'Hindu vs Muslim' (CD Deshmukh Lecture, 2023)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 окт 2024
  • Titled “Our History, Your History, Whose History?”, her speech delivered at the annual C.D.Deshmukh memorial lecture at the India International Centre brought out the primary contradiction between professional historians who depend on methodological analysis that “demands a training in reading sources” to give an understanding of how our past came to be and popular historians who lack training but more often than create an imagined history to establish majoritarian supremacy.
    Join The Wire's RUclips Membership and get exclusive content, member-only emojis, live interaction with The Wire's founders, editors and reporters and much more. Memberships to The Wire Crew start at Rs 89/month. / @thewirenews

Комментарии • 276

  • @rranjan3439
    @rranjan3439 Год назад +27

    "It's like Yasin Mallick giving lecture on Indian Nationalism to the Kashmir Separatists "

  • @freeman4899
    @freeman4899 8 месяцев назад +11

    Secularism doesn't mean Islamic supremacy. The problem is the people who think they know everything , they are been questioned about their knowledge that's why they feel india is no longer secular

    • @kaustav1894
      @kaustav1894 6 месяцев назад

      Can you just give a few examples of her misinterpretation and distortion. I genuinely need to check it out. Searched everywhere in Google but couldn't actually understand why is she hated

  • @alokmishra2446
    @alokmishra2446 9 месяцев назад +5

    Such a devious historian

  • @chandrashekharkulwe1276
    @chandrashekharkulwe1276 4 месяца назад +3

    Great historian.... Andhabhakta can't understand it.

  • @reimei2819
    @reimei2819 Год назад +14

    Brilliant. Thank you. I started listening and couldn't stop. Finished all the way to the end. I hope more people take the time to listen.

  • @aksshaysharma96
    @aksshaysharma96 11 месяцев назад +3

    It was she who reduced it to Hindu vs Muslim debate, by suppressing facts and providing a version which would appease a certain section of people, and completely suppress and to the extent f shamelessly supressing the long illustrious history of various Indina kings.
    (the absence of her brethren in 2010 Ayodhya judgement is very well documented in the judgement itself.)
    She herself perpetuated the divide by backing the ideas of colonialists and made India a prime example of Post-Colonial state,.
    Now when confronted by other Historians, academics, instead of defending her work and manuscripts, she is playing the same old technique of preaching, rather than standing by her works.
    No wonder we still have a colonial indset as education has made us believe what British envisioned of India.
    And studying Ancinet Indina History from an Anglacised historians, is similar to a Nazi teaching Human Rights to Jews

  • @seasasik8982
    @seasasik8982 Год назад +25

    thanks to The Wire for posting this precious gem of a speech 🙏 Romila Thapar, 91 and still serving us her wisdom, wit and sheer brilliance is invaluable to help us understand the current state of our society🙏wish her a longer life to keep inspiring us all in the pursuit of truth, knowledge and excellence❤

    • @nishamanjrekar4623
      @nishamanjrekar4623 Год назад

      Absolutely right .
      This Romila Thaper is mentally sick woman.

  • @Personal_View
    @Personal_View Год назад +14

    Romila Thapar was recently invited to debates, but I have never seen her in one. No matter what she says in her written commentary here, I still think she needs to accept that her view of history is not the only one and that there are other true perspectives as well. She is supporter of colonialism and the Aryan invasion theory. We all need to live in harmony in any country including India. Those who claim that India is secular and that the Muslims that remained in India and did not want to join Pakistan should bear in my mind the following fact: 97% Muslims voted in favour of the Muslim League for Pakistan Creation, but 50% of them chose to stay back Post Partition.

    • @nowwhat6716
      @nowwhat6716 Год назад +1

      What are U even talking about.

    • @TheViqaruddin
      @TheViqaruddin Год назад +1

      So what do you want to say. Now we have more Muslims in India than Pakistan so you want to further divide the country or make a single unit or to say vehemently Akhand Bharat . I am in favor of Akhand Bharat including Afghanistan so that we can live without any dispute with our neighbors.

    • @pentyalasambaiah
      @pentyalasambaiah Год назад +1

      A funny comment... she supports colonialism!!!!

  • @waqtkiawaz7914
    @waqtkiawaz7914 Год назад +8

    The principal differences between Hindu and Hindutwa is non violence & violence respectively.
    While Hindu's are there from time immemorial but Hindutwa was born in 1925.

    • @hindurashtra63
      @hindurashtra63 Год назад +1

      Hindutwa is simple "Essence of Hindu Teachings".
      You can call it Hinduism, The "Ism" is a Foreign Word added by British. In Sanskrit, The "Ism" is called "Tatva" so shortened to "Tva". So "Essence of Hindu" = Hindu + Tatwa = Hindutwa = Hinduiusm.
      Our Hindu Gods were not Pacifist like Gandhi or Jesus, They carry Weapons to Slaughter the Wicked and Evil Forces while upholding "Dharma" (Righteous Code) and Protecting the Weak and Innocent.

    • @FirstLast-fj1yp
      @FirstLast-fj1yp Год назад

    • @FirstLast-fj1yp
      @FirstLast-fj1yp Год назад +6

      but there is no difference between islam and violence.

    • @waqtkiawaz7914
      @waqtkiawaz7914 Год назад +1

      @@hindurashtra63 yes as Hindutwa is born in 1925 therefore its simple as a "Essence of Ravana teachings" but Hindu's follows teaching of Great Ram only.

    • @amandeep9930
      @amandeep9930 Год назад

      ❤️❤️❤️

  • @shahree100
    @shahree100 Год назад +29

    Let the hateful comments, attacking this 92 year old world renowned academic who has devoted herself to Indian history, begin 😔😔

    • @parthbhatt2648
      @parthbhatt2648 Год назад +13

      Oh, that's so sweet. Her devotion reminds me of Mao Zedong and sir stalin

    • @hindurashtra63
      @hindurashtra63 Год назад +1

      A Monkey was raised among Bandits (Daku). It saw itself as a Victim and its Bandit Masters as Rightful People. So it helped its Bandit Master to Steal, Kill and Loot from Innocent people. The Monkey was not Evil, It was just a Prodiuct of Upbringing and Braineashing with Wicked and Evil Bandits, who had brainwashed it.
      Such is the case of Romila Thapar. She will never accept her Agenda is built around the Christian Colonizers and Islamic Invaders in the first place. She is just like the Brainwashed Monkey in the hands of Wicked Bandits. I wouldn't blame the Monkey, I would feel pity for it and blame the Bandits for their Brainwashing.

    • @FirstLast-fj1yp
      @FirstLast-fj1yp Год назад +3

      joke of the century.

    • @MikeMessiah
      @MikeMessiah Год назад +2

      All the hindu andh bhakts have arrived.

    • @FirstLast-fj1yp
      @FirstLast-fj1yp Год назад +6

      @@MikeMessiah we were waiting for the converted xtians.

  • @reubenboipai7728
    @reubenboipai7728 Год назад +6

    Nobody can erase history.

  • @prabirkumardasgupta9824
    @prabirkumardasgupta9824 Год назад +23

    she has slapped on the face of present rulers !
    I do not know how long these ruling classes will tolerate such excellent speech !
    when we listin all these things , we do not feel that in india everything is not lost yet !

    • @abhayjay8391
      @abhayjay8391 Год назад +3

      Tolerate 🤣 how many of have heard her speech 🤣 even in wire it's only 2K. Get out of your whatever the sapce you're in 🥵😭🤣

    • @FirstLast-fj1yp
      @FirstLast-fj1yp Год назад +1

      next convertee identified.

    • @aamirriaztoto9476
      @aamirriaztoto9476 Год назад

      not only current but also previous because all follows james mill narratives with slite divergent angles

  • @NS-vx8qm
    @NS-vx8qm Год назад +5

    She is the distorter-in-chief of Indian history.

  • @firna1864
    @firna1864 5 месяцев назад

    This video has very bad sound quality, can you please do something... We want to hear her clearly. Thanks

  • @SrDRD
    @SrDRD Год назад +26

    She is the main reason we were not able to know abt the real beautiful history of our Bharat in the history textbooks
    She is the main Culprit.

    • @malluaski1
      @malluaski1 Год назад +9

      Sanghi spotted

    • @SrDRD
      @SrDRD Год назад +6

      @@malluaski1 proud sanghi ri mallu anna navu.

    • @malluaski1
      @malluaski1 Год назад +1

      @@SrDRD yaar pa neenu?

    • @vamsikrishna7227
      @vamsikrishna7227 Год назад +5

      How can someone else be responsible for your ignorance?

    • @SrDRD
      @SrDRD Год назад

      @@vamsikrishna7227 By hiding and not telling the actual truth. Simple.
      My point is the lessons taught in History book is not the complete truth.
      It's about perception my dear friend.
      They they were the owners of our perception.
      They fed this narrative not only to us but all generation after independence.
      So we became ignorant.

  • @maheshn9970
    @maheshn9970 Год назад +13

    Crystal clear at 91. Great inspiration 🙏🏼

  • @aamirriaztoto9476
    @aamirriaztoto9476 Год назад +2

    Like Hidu & Muslim period the colonial writers also mentioned Ranjit Singh as Sikh ruler too.

  • @dipanwitadas
    @dipanwitadas Год назад +7

    Great historian who understands history isn't all about who reigned the era but all people who lived that era. Greatly said by her in civilized society all knowledge is open to questioning.

  • @harishagurappa9212
    @harishagurappa9212 Год назад +11

    Thanks to The Wire for this interview. One of the very rare and exceptional piece. I will be downloading and saving this to re watch and share with my circles. I hope all Indians watch this

  • @shadabahmed579
    @shadabahmed579 Год назад +20

    indians need romila thapar now more than ever.

    • @dimpu603
      @dimpu603 Год назад +22

      Same as Pakistani need Osama Bin Laden more than ever....

    • @shadabahmed579
      @shadabahmed579 Год назад +2

      @@dimpu603 no

    • @Sunnyside24
      @Sunnyside24 Год назад +8

      Ya to do more propaganda and give more Pro m uslim pro invaders narrative in the name of history right ? .
      According to these pseudo liverandus , aurangzeb was a peaceful poet , babar was a peaceful king , gaznavi was a peaceful secular Sufi .
      These people fooled us for last 75 years .now no more .

    • @shadabahmed579
      @shadabahmed579 Год назад

      @@Sunnyside24 stop spreading fake news

    • @narkelnaru2710
      @narkelnaru2710 Год назад

      @@Sunnyside24
      arrey vah vah vah,
      arrey vah ji vah.

  • @pseudonym9215
    @pseudonym9215 Год назад +17

    Yes, Indian history is the history of Indians. The people of the sub continent. Not of A religion but of All the religions that the people follow.

    • @hindurashtra63
      @hindurashtra63 Год назад +9

      But Christianity came to India from Colonizers and Islam from Invaders.
      Before this, India was just Hindu with minority dharma like Buddhism, Sikhism and Jainism. And saying this is not wrong, It is Historical Fact !!!
      Granted, everybody should be treated equally, How do Hindus who were slaiughtered and Colonized by Muslims and Christians for 12 Centuries get compensation today ?

    • @pseudonym9215
      @pseudonym9215 Год назад +3

      @@hindurashtra63 Indians were not slaughtered under any regime. No kings can establish a long lasting kingdom by force. Some regime were harsher than the others. What makes you think Hindus were not invaders. If there existed a king, he would surely invade other territory. Eg, Ashoka of the Guptas, waged a bloody war in Kalinga. Your scope of looking at history is flawed and tribal.

    • @farheen2521
      @farheen2521 Год назад

      @@hindurashtra63 its also fact that around 800 years mughals ruled but didn't force to convert into islam as well as didn't slaughter hindus....you want evidence ....Your ancestors and YOU..If it happened..there would have been no hindu and still hindus are in majority in INDIA

    • @balajiraju4157
      @balajiraju4157 Год назад +4

      @@pseudonym9215 our historian didn't hide Ashoka atrocities but they sure hide Mughal and glorify them

    • @pseudonym9215
      @pseudonym9215 Год назад

      @@balajiraju4157 lol

  • @thesewingencyclopedia
    @thesewingencyclopedia Год назад +20

    The Rs.2 troll gang have arrived!

    • @tellme8140
      @tellme8140 Год назад +5

      Tuje 100 ₹ milte hai kya gulami

    • @thesewingencyclopedia
      @thesewingencyclopedia Год назад

      @@tellme8140 no no boss.. little more. Not that cheap! Amit malvia likes me. Personal relationship

    • @tellme8140
      @tellme8140 Год назад +1

      @@thesewingencyclopedia personal relationship kya....tera baap hai kya hai wo...

    • @thesewingencyclopedia
      @thesewingencyclopedia Год назад

      @@tellme8140 baap nahi - bhai! Kaafi paisa aa raha hai. Special operations. Troll ko troll!

  • @kazimustaqeem
    @kazimustaqeem Год назад +13

    Profound speech.

  • @sumanaspirit
    @sumanaspirit Год назад +14

    Have people noticed that all the attacks on this historian consist of name-calling and abuse, not engagement with the substance of her argument, which people are free to find fault with, as long as they pinpoint what about it they disagree with and why? Only badly brought-up toddlers call each other names without offering a concrete, substantial reason that can be cross-checked for its validity.

    • @nishamanjrekar4623
      @nishamanjrekar4623 Год назад

      Romila thapper was a Secular Historian..
      That mean she is entitled to lie for Islamik terrorism. She ifen praised those Muslims who massacred Hindus and ra ped Hindu females
      She often praised who looted and destroied Hindu temples.
      This is called Secularism in India .

    • @sumanaramanandixit7847
      @sumanaramanandixit7847 Год назад +2

      @@anthhhess3477 People can post links or mention critiques. I myself would like to read them, although only from professionals who have the requisite training, not charlatans and third-rate amateurs. Please post links or mention books here written by this category of folk. I welcome genuine intellectual debate.

    • @chatrapatishivajithegreat2998
      @chatrapatishivajithegreat2998 Год назад +4

      What do you think about her statement about gaznavi attack on somnath was derive only out greed for wealth inspite of fact that iconoclastism is major islamic teaching and evidences that gaznavi clearly refuse to stop destruction of idol in exchange of all wealth.

    • @bavitayadav7531
      @bavitayadav7531 Год назад

      @@chatrapatishivajithegreat2998 now he won't reply

    • @aksshaysharma96
      @aksshaysharma96 11 месяцев назад

      seems like you don;t read much, many academics, historians have openly come out with their books and manuscriots and are asking openly to her, to find faults in it. You yourself are not well versed with what has come out recently. the left parasite is seriously dangerous as they completely ignore what is happening

  • @jagdishramanathan2091
    @jagdishramanathan2091 Год назад +2

    Romilaji lead lectureful but wasteful life !❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @AbhayKumar-ph9mx
    @AbhayKumar-ph9mx Год назад +29

    She is my favourite historian always inspired by her and capabilities to better in history.

    • @laliga2160
      @laliga2160 Год назад +13

      Can she read Sanskrit /farsi?If no then how did she become expert?Just answer the simple question.

    • @laliga2160
      @laliga2160 Год назад +6

      @@Malviya_Propagandu_Rs.2_Wala ok,out of those 20k+,is she one of them?She must be check carefully.

    • @abhayjay8391
      @abhayjay8391 Год назад +3

      @@Malviya_Propagandu_Rs.2_Wala lol. Do you know how many people can do coding or understand the programming language. I guess a very few percentage of the population. Not knowing is not an issue. But a person who doesn't know any of the programming language can claim to be a coding wizard 🤣?? Just answer it 🥵

    • @tradek9231
      @tradek9231 Год назад +11

      @@laliga2160 : Neither she is historian, nor Sanskrit scholar, I will call these people as tampering peoples !!!
      Iff you quite, She will ready to tell Dharmaraja and Buddha may be in same year !! same area !!

    • @laliga2160
      @laliga2160 Год назад

      @@Malviya_Propagandu_Rs.2_Wala How are you saying Brahmins or others of our Bharatia origin not be flourishing here in Bharat?Are Bramins not from Bharat,if not then where are they from.
      If they are then why are you feeling insecure.Yes you may say they should have place for other opinions.

  • @Imroz11
    @Imroz11 Год назад +6

    Sound decibel too low

  • @SnehaSharma-m4b
    @SnehaSharma-m4b Год назад

    Upthanks ma'am

  • @Curlyproftales
    @Curlyproftales Год назад +5

    Thats how left selection worked. History person selected on basis of biology . Fabricator of History

  • @macjonseun6920
    @macjonseun6920 Месяц назад

    Self proclaimed historian and her husband self proclaimed best journalist

  • @jenniferpaccers882
    @jenniferpaccers882 Год назад

    The sound is awful. Can u correct so we can hear properly

  • @motivateall9751
    @motivateall9751 Год назад +6

    What a great human being Romilaji. Happy new year to all .May god bless all with happiness and good health.

  • @desi_anarch
    @desi_anarch Год назад +5

    Fantastic lecture. Many thanks to TheWire

  • @AbhishekSingh-yv7nt
    @AbhishekSingh-yv7nt Год назад +4

    Listening to you mam is soothing

  • @rravisankar3355
    @rravisankar3355 9 месяцев назад

    Let Ms Thaper explain her evidences for making her 'findings' that Yudhishthira was born after Ashoka. She can muster all her 'training' and facility in reading of scientific evidences.

  • @ranenbhattacharyya136
    @ranenbhattacharyya136 Год назад

    Noun. alethophobia (uncountable) (psychology) A fear or dislike of the truth; an unwillingness to come to terms with truth or facts.
    Romila T suffers from the above

  • @gghutind9949
    @gghutind9949 Год назад +10

    Nice Ithaskar , salute

  • @pg_7080
    @pg_7080 Год назад +2

    Thank you WIRE for airing this lecture by Romila Thapar. It's always an enlightening pleasure listening to Thapar.

  • @aap223
    @aap223 Год назад +7

    Let this speech go in to glorious history! Nice presentation.
    For so many "rulers of present time", it may be very hard to listen to or understand it. No possibility of knowledge for blind bhakts.

  • @anniejoy1526
    @anniejoy1526 8 месяцев назад

    Did she gave historian Sitaram Goyal's answer till date? I feel she should...

  • @c.nagriknews8837
    @c.nagriknews8837 Год назад +1

    The sound Quality ?*

  • @c.nagriknews8837
    @c.nagriknews8837 Год назад +10

    DB DD KOSAMBI and Living Legend ROMILA THAPAR Active Historically n Tallest Public Intellectual*

  • @maha5
    @maha5 Год назад +17

    So, Yudhishthir learnt Satya, ahimsa from Asoka. You should take up a mission of reviewing and rewriting ancient Indian literature for enlightening Indians. Many historians proved that one need not have even basic skills of Sanskrit or Pali language still you can become a prominent historian of ancient India. Keep going. No pun intended.

    • @Indian_Armed_Forces_Edits
      @Indian_Armed_Forces_Edits Год назад

      🤣🤣👍👍

    • @maheshmudgal1973
      @maheshmudgal1973 Год назад +4

      You have a very high expectations from Thapar family.... 😂
      They just know to talk without any supporting documents

    • @maha5
      @maha5 Год назад +2

      @@maheshmudgal1973 How could one be experts in Indian history without knowledge of Sanskrit?? Is it possible?? No right thinking person can have such a view ??

    • @maheshmudgal1973
      @maheshmudgal1973 Год назад +1

      @@maha5 so only knowing one language is enough to? What about knowledge about science, archeological?
      She needs to be an expert in all of this to be an historian. Just know Sanskrit is an qualified to be an historian, then we have plenty of historian in India

    • @maha5
      @maha5 Год назад

      @@maheshmudgal1973 You are asking for the sky. If you get food on the platter why will you think of acquiring skills to sustain yourself. Architecture, science, linguistics etc are too much for them. Don't have so many expectations, settle for bare minimum.

  • @aniketaggarwal1224
    @aniketaggarwal1224 11 месяцев назад +3

    Romilia Thapar is a pappu historian 😂

  • @promilajoshi7815
    @promilajoshi7815 Год назад +3

    Romila ji an intelligent person

  • @andy_baseballplayer
    @andy_baseballplayer Год назад +9

    she doesn't know sanskrit and gives lesson on history of india which primary source is written in sanskrit. its like giving arabs their history lesson without knowing arabic. without primary source how can she be called a historian disgusting!!!!!

    • @sumanaramanandixit7847
      @sumanaramanandixit7847 Год назад

      On what basis do you say she does not know Sanskrit? She does.

    • @andy_baseballplayer
      @andy_baseballplayer Год назад +7

      @@sumanaramanandixit7847 she herself admitted it in an interview plz check. She has no right to distort history and enforce her agenda on our history books

    • @santanubhattacharjee1966
      @santanubhattacharjee1966 Год назад +3

      You are absolutely right

    • @mogambo4565
      @mogambo4565 Год назад

      What does it have to do with the subject matter ? You can have translators it's not that hard. No one needs to know every detail but some things should be left to experts. You haven't read all abrahamic books I assume still you hate them right?

  • @poonamsharma-ot6jp
    @poonamsharma-ot6jp Год назад +5

    She is An European tail....पूँछ है अंग्रेजों की।

    • @sahilchandrikapure3311
      @sahilchandrikapure3311 Год назад

      tumhare side se likhti to nationalist kehlati😀

    • @aksshaysharma96
      @aksshaysharma96 11 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@sahilchandrikapure3311tumhare side se abhi ,ikh rahi hai, tabhi tum usse i tellectual bol rahe ho,varna toh sab dilh raha hai iski books hai ki Kitni intellectual hai yeh.

  • @shahadathussain6869
    @shahadathussain6869 Год назад +3

    The voice is low

  • @mohit085
    @mohit085 Год назад +10

    Really ashamed that such a senior lady is trying to legitimize the destruction of ancient Indian infrastructure by the medieval tyrants as an innocent attempt to be part of Indian culture.

    • @ishtiaqueahmed8450
      @ishtiaqueahmed8450 Год назад +4

      Probably you are talking about the destruction of Buddhism and Buddhist monuments by brahmanwad

    • @PriyankaDas-gj5gs
      @PriyankaDas-gj5gs Год назад +3

      The Brahmanical rulers also did the same to Buddhist viharas and places of worship.

    • @kumar7586
      @kumar7586 Год назад

      @@ishtiaqueahmed8450
      👍

    • @kumar7586
      @kumar7586 Год назад

      @@PriyankaDas-gj5gs
      👍

    • @FirstLast-fj1yp
      @FirstLast-fj1yp Год назад

      this is the opium that eric was talking about.

  • @pardeepbhandari6487
    @pardeepbhandari6487 Год назад +6

    She is very good at writing fake his story. She does not know anything about Itihash. A daughter of a privileged family. .

  • @dharmikrakshak8340
    @dharmikrakshak8340 Год назад +2

    Don’t describe nationalism through CHRISTIANISM and ISLAMISM eye.

  • @MartinkingLuthear
    @MartinkingLuthear Год назад +4

    What a wonderful personality and lecture…

  • @VSS_Unionist
    @VSS_Unionist 8 месяцев назад

    Romila Thapar needs to be thrown out of Bharat!

  • @ajay5117
    @ajay5117 10 месяцев назад

    Wire is shameless, this video proves it.

  • @s.b626
    @s.b626 10 месяцев назад

    Romilla what evidence did you great trained professional historians have for the Aryan Invasion theory 😅😅

  • @siddharthasarkar2708
    @siddharthasarkar2708 Год назад +6

    Most dishonest historian of Indian history.

  • @s.b626
    @s.b626 10 месяцев назад

    Gee Romilla, many Indians cooperated with the British so i guess that means the British didnt loot or colonized India😅😅what a,moran

  • @aamirriaztoto9476
    @aamirriaztoto9476 Год назад

    One needs to unhold nationalsism with more angles, now US, Canada & austrialia are nations but these are totally out of box nationalisms

  • @xanithkl
    @xanithkl Год назад +1

    I was surprises to find her talk at this level knowing her age is 91yo!!! Wow very inspiring!! 😍😍😍

  • @sreejithalltech
    @sreejithalltech Год назад +6

    Salute 👏👏👏

  • @वन्देमातरम्-य3श

    *निंदा करने वाला व्यक्ति सज्जन को बदनाम कर सकता है,*
    *मगर,,,,,,,खुद सज्जन नहीं बन सकता !!*

    • @narkelnaru2710
      @narkelnaru2710 Год назад +3

      सही बात है। हिपौक्रिसी की भी कोई सीमा होती है । हा हा हा ।

    • @वन्देमातरम्-य3श
      @वन्देमातरम्-य3श Год назад

      @@narkelnaru2710 ये रोमिला थापर और आप जैसो वामपंथी विचार-विमर्श वाले हिन्दू फ़ोबिया से पीड़ित लोगो के लिए ही हैं।

  • @Policies2040
    @Policies2040 Год назад +7

    We need real historiographers like her

    • @Parneet-jn5fg
      @Parneet-jn5fg 9 месяцев назад +1

      Oh really? Then ur concept of learning or understanding history is too narrow

  • @paperclips1306
    @paperclips1306 Год назад

    Is she karan Thapars sister?

  • @shafeequeahmed258
    @shafeequeahmed258 Год назад

    Wow super diesel sound 😊

  • @InDepth369
    @InDepth369 Год назад +1

    Romila Thapar is an efficient researcher but intellectually deficient human suffering from alethophobia.

  • @santanubhattacharjee1966
    @santanubhattacharjee1966 Год назад +4

    Bad 👎 historian

    • @वन्देमातरम्-य3श
      @वन्देमातरम्-य3श Год назад +1

      ruclips.net/video/_8ghgzMwsJs/видео.html
      रोमिला थापर इतिहास को बदलने की बहुत कोशिश कर चुकी और सत्य हमेशा सत्य ही रहता है।
      सही इतिहास सामने आने लगा तो परेशान हो रही है।

  • @ashishgautam3679
    @ashishgautam3679 Год назад +7

    Romila Thapar Jee is an excellent fiction writer!

    • @kallolpoetry
      @kallolpoetry Год назад

      ​​@Maha Hindutwa buffons do not know history that's why they are hell bent on defiling Romila. So, what kind of literary evidence you have to support your own statement. Romila might be the only historian in India who has been open and in fact liberal with how indians percieved history as early mode of recording events. She went out of a limb to quoto deviating sentences to piece together a proof that Indians knew how to write history. If you question a historian, come with your literary evidence cross checked by linguists and scholars, and who says she does not know Sanskrit? Well even if she does not know does not change the fact that in SOAS where she teaches and even became a professor emirtus there has trained sanskritists who train people in Pali, Prakrit and Classical Sanskrit. Same in Cambridge and Oxford as well. It's easy to question anyone's work by questioning it, it's upon the other person to respond and defend themselves. Romila is often questioned on her narratives, populist narrative reconstruction. But heresay is not history go get a document that you think contradicts the very point she is making and provide an alternate argument on it. The fact that right wing's intellectual handicapped existence, that they do not have good historians, they cannot submit proof, their books are often shred to pieces in a peer review basis, is not something that Romila is responsible. You guys should write and research better. What do you know about Sanskrit? Pali and Prakrit? During Mauryas what language was the authority implementing on people. Even dharmshastras even the most auspicious kinds say that Sanskrit is only reserved for Brahmans. Brahmans being the 12th kind of priest where there were others as well. Rig veda has been geneologically rewritten almost thousand times and the most hilarious part is if it was not for british i hardly think people would even know India had a history. Saying is easy, being tasted and able to provide counterfactuals is hard.

  • @thripurakotamraju7415
    @thripurakotamraju7415 8 месяцев назад

    Is she still Alive?!?

  • @santanubhattacharjee1966
    @santanubhattacharjee1966 Год назад +4

    Bad 👎 very bad 👎 historian

  • @Curlyproftales
    @Curlyproftales Год назад

    Crocodile in chiffon sari

  • @shrutijadhav9688
    @shrutijadhav9688 Год назад +3

    🙌🏻👌🏻🙌🏻

  • @santanubhattacharjee1966
    @santanubhattacharjee1966 Год назад +4

    👎 bad historian

  • @AlokKumar-ie3vy
    @AlokKumar-ie3vy Год назад +5

    Distorian Romila Thapar.

  • @pvaish
    @pvaish Год назад +3

    And your point is @Romila?
    You have been presenting the same slanted view of the history to serve a very specific agenda for many decades.
    Not saying that your facts are all wrong, but it is the interpretation that is just one possible view, however dishonest it might be.

  • @tellme8140
    @tellme8140 Год назад +4

    She comes from harem of Mughals.....These were she learner all this jihadic things

  • @sm9214
    @sm9214 Год назад +8

    Another half-baked analysis. History thru biology?
    Various bio studies on whether a lion or tiger be a pet....should be the basis on the above line: for eg:
    "No matter how cooperative and docile they may seem and act there are no guarantees that their interaction with humans won’t turn from friendly to aggressive at some point in their life. The aggression of a tamed animal can be far more unpredictable, and dangerous, compared to domesticated animals".

    • @kallolpoetry
      @kallolpoetry Год назад

      ​​@Maha Hindutwa buffons do not know history that's why they are hell bent on defiling Romila. So, what kind of literary evidence you have to support your own statement. Romila might be the only historian in India who has been open and in fact liberal with how indians percieved history as early mode of recording events. She went out of a limb to quoto deviating sentences to piece together a proof that Indians knew how to write history. If you question a historian, come with your literary evidence cross checked by linguists and scholars, and who says she does not know Sanskrit? Well even if she does not know does not change the fact that in SOAS where she teaches and even became a professor emirtus there has trained sanskritists who train people in Pali, Prakrit and Classical Sanskrit. Same in Cambridge and Oxford as well. It's easy to question anyone's work by questioning it, it's upon the other person to respond and defend themselves. Romila is often questioned on her narratives, populist narrative reconstruction. But heresay is not history go get a document that you think contradicts the very point she is making and provide an alternate argument on it. The fact that right wing's intellectual handicapped existence, that they do not have good historians, they cannot submit proof, their books are often shred to pieces in a peer review basis, is not something that Romila is responsible. You guys should write and research better. What do you know about Sanskrit? Pali and Prakrit? During Mauryas what language was the authority implementing on people. Even dharmshastras even the most auspicious kinds say that Sanskrit is only reserved for Brahmans. Brahmans being the 12th kind of priest where there were others as well. Rig veda has been geneologically rewritten almost thousand times and the most hilarious part is if it was not for british i hardly think people would even know India had a history. Saying is easy, being tasted and able to provide counterfactuals is hard.

  • @pradeepm.p395
    @pradeepm.p395 6 месяцев назад

    Wrong historian

  • @Immortal_VK
    @Immortal_VK Год назад +6

    Respect 🫡

  • @pardeepbhandari6487
    @pardeepbhandari6487 Год назад +16

    She is Traitor

    • @narkelnaru2710
      @narkelnaru2710 Год назад +8

      Congratulations. Now you are the expert.

    • @Sunnyside24
      @Sunnyside24 Год назад

      Exactly, These liberandu historians are slave of Mughals . They always defame Hi ndus and glorify barbaric isla mic invaders .

    • @narkelnaru2710
      @narkelnaru2710 Год назад +4

      @@Sunnyside24
      Slaves of Mughals ? Where do the Mughals live ?

    • @kavisiddu
      @kavisiddu Год назад +5

      Thank God you did not understand the speech..

    • @ishtiaqueahmed8450
      @ishtiaqueahmed8450 Год назад +2

      The real traitors are nagpuri wala

  • @snehamardikar8426
    @snehamardikar8426 29 дней назад

    @The Wire it doesn't matter how much you show off Karan , or Romila both have got big Thaapaar(d) from Bharatiya janasamudaay. It will never work. This your biggest failure, all communists anti-national lobby is reduced to kachare ka dibba😂😂😂 , special kolhapuri chappal ka thaapaad for this .......

  • @Drsashisekhardubey
    @Drsashisekhardubey Год назад +4

    Distinguished distortionist

  • @Maharawal..
    @Maharawal.. Год назад

    Haramjadi

  • @goldeesingh1234
    @goldeesingh1234 Год назад

    Kass romila thapar hindi me bhi bolti

  • @manutrivedi5771
    @manutrivedi5771 Год назад +3

    Mehru’s sister. Part of the project.

  • @santanubhattacharjee1966
    @santanubhattacharjee1966 Год назад +2

    Very Very 👎 bad 👎 historian

  • @aamirriaztoto9476
    @aamirriaztoto9476 Год назад

    nationalisms are facing huge challenge in the digital age

  • @poonamsharma-ot6jp
    @poonamsharma-ot6jp Год назад

    She should be ashamed of what she is saying....How will a nation get build....

  • @drrmdebnath8356
    @drrmdebnath8356 Год назад +1

    Is she Karan Thapar's relation ? Oh lord Shiva🧜‍♂️🧜‍♂️🧜‍♂️🧜‍♂️🧜‍♂️🧜‍♂️🧜‍♂️🧜‍♂️🧜‍♂️🧜‍♂️🧜‍♂️🧜‍♂️🧜‍♂️

  • @chandramohanmenon7181
    @chandramohanmenon7181 Год назад +1

    Very good

  • @venkatk4418
    @venkatk4418 Год назад

    wow. Just ignore every wrong done to India and never learn anything from it. India is divided into two pieces. That is fine the half you live in affords you freedom of speech. Do everthing you can do divide into multiple pieces.

  • @deshbandhu1
    @deshbandhu1 Год назад

    Great Indian historian .👍

  • @ShriKrisna108
    @ShriKrisna108 Год назад +1

    Fake Historian
    Come and debate openly with counters to claim your history.

  • @redindianaztec6768
    @redindianaztec6768 Год назад

    Audio is very low

  • @dcamper11
    @dcamper11 9 месяцев назад

    This Romela character has done enough damage to the nation. It’s a shame.

  • @ShriKrisna108
    @ShriKrisna108 Год назад

    At least answer to sita ram goels letter.

  • @velu1671
    @velu1671 Год назад

    So many sanadana sangis crying here.bramanical sandani are another form vedic talibans of helmand river harauvatis civilization afghanistan.

  • @mahadev1599
    @mahadev1599 Год назад +2

    Wire is liar

  • @santanubhattacharjee1966
    @santanubhattacharjee1966 Год назад +4

    Bad 👎 historian