Russia mobilize 30 million soldiers in world war 2 and Russia lost 26 million soldiers in World war 2. Russia has the capacity . Ukraine only has 40 million population. 😅
@miteshghadi3146 The Soviet Union was fighting a war of national survival in 1941-1945. Over a third of their armed forces, and some of their best, were Ukrainians themselves. Fighting an existential war is very different to an expeditionary one, such as their "special military operation" into Ukraine, particularly with respect to the level of sacrifice by the population. The Soviets withdrew from Afghanistan in 1989 having taken approximately 70,000 casualties, both dead and seriously wounded. Their casualties in Ukraine are currently in excess of ten times this figure.
@miteshghadi3146 That's why the Orc's need North Koreans,Mercenaries from around the world. Ukraines are all volunteers, not paid bounces, just a low wage. Ukraine needs to think about paying foreign fighters. 🇺🇦🇬🇧🇬🇮🇺🇦👍
@@miteshghadi3146 Russia struggling to mobilise 30,000 in a month, when losses are 45,000. That was the USSR in WW2, not Russia & the 27 million included 19 million civilians. Times have changed.
The Russians have called the President of Azerbaijan a rude word for a friend of Dorothy. This and the small "incident" as they call the downed aeroplane ✈️ is not earning friends.
@@stephenlyon1358 Nobody is perfect but Starmer is probably more intelligent than most of them. And no I don't live in eutopia, too many people voted for corrupt and evil politicians here. You should be happy with Starmer, the alternatives were quite abysmal .
Truth is Russian gains ground in Eastern Ukraine every day. In the West we would be horrified at how many men they lose to capture a ruined town. Problem is that the Russian mind works differently. 30,000 men lost to capture a village is still a success to Russia, objective achieved in their eyes. They've lost over a million men now in this pointless war. A million future, fathers, workers and taxpayers gone.
@livingtribunal4110 Basic maths actually. Russia has averaged losses of 1000 men a day (nearer 2000 a day at the moment, but lets average it at 1000 a day since the illegal war began). This was confirmed by a nurse at a Russian hospital, she said 1000 men a day turn up wounded. That's just at HER hospital. Now factor in the deaths on top of that. War has gone on for over 1000 days, Russia losses average 1000 men a day (probably more) = 1 MILLION men dead or seriously wounded at the very least. Russia will try to hide the true losses but it could be as high as 2 million dead and wounded. For what? So you can have some extra land? Pathetic!
The long term damage done by the GOP House of Representatives in cutting off the flow of aid to Ukraine for 6 months can not be overststed. Not only were Ukrainiantroops driven from defensive positions that they might have held with proper artillery supplies, but Russia took those positions with a small fraction of the manpower and equipment losses they are suffering now assaulting what are substantially less hardened defensive positions than those they captured during the supply shortage. Even worse in the long run was the unnecessary loss of many of Ukraine's most veteran soldiers. If Russia wins this war, they should publicly thank MAGA for their success.
@@kappenmann12 gGreat theory, but the European nations at that time did not have the stored artillery ammunition to supply Ukraine (to say nothing of the 3,000 "obsolete" Bradleys waiting to be destroyed as excess in the USA). Look at the material supply capabilities of the USA vs. all other nations supporting Ukraine combined when the GOP halted Ukrainian resupply and tell me, if you can, that Europe could have supplied a fraction, with great difficulty, of what the USA could provide easily from obsolete stocks.
Realist Brit here. Sorry Mate from Down-Under. The mistake you're making (like almost all the commentators) is thinking in terms of casualties like in a modern war; the Russians are fighting like in WW1 and thinking about casualties in that way. Don’t forget, the British lost 19,000 killed (plus 30,000 wounded) on July 1st 1916 (Battle of the Somme) and with a population then of about 37 million, lost 2.4 of the population killed in WW1. Russia’s and North Koreas combined population is 160 million, (OK, more older people) so theoretically they’ve got at least 3 millions fighters left. The weaponry is possibly the problem, if there is one, not the personnel. The west sits back in the vain hope that Russia will totally degrade itself. The West should seize this opportunity to put a stop to the war, militarily, and put an end to the Putin regime once and for all.
I agree personel is not the problem, weaponry could get one, but surely the economy and the ruble will be a Problem for Russia. But that could be to late for Ukraine , sadly
Putin is finished. I don't think he will see this year out . The only reason he is keeping the war he started going is he knows he has nowhere to run, will lose all of his STOLEN MONEY AND SPEND THE REST OF HIS PATHETIC LIFE IN PRISON OR ON THE END OF A ROPE.
You've heard of the nuclear stand-off? "Realistically", direct conflict, for any purpose, raises the chance of a nuclear exchange, especially with a weaker Russia and a threatened, maybe nihilistic Putin.
I would disagree and even say the personnel will be a factor. You forgot to mention, that back then in WW1, the population of Britain (and the other countries) was much younger, so much of the fighting soldiers were actually young adults. We are not in that time anymore. Russians and Ukrainians fight with older dudes. Actually, the young men are so valuable, that they are even protected from mobilization in Russia and Ukraine. That should tell you something. So, even on the paper, Russia could go on, the stark reality is, that they cannot, because they already are fighting mostly with people that would have been in retirement or in the office in WW1. Why is the age of the soldiers so important? Because the young ones are physically and mentally more able to attack and quickly get from A to Z. They can fight the whole day. A forty year old dude cannot, even if he is fit. We see that already with the Russians, they have not the strength to really go roughshod over the Ukrainans, mainly because their soldiers are too old to shoulder that kind of effort. The Ukrainians have the same problems, but they are in a general mobilisation, so they can more easily draw on the young men, but even in Ukraine the military and civil leaders are trying to not take young men too early, because for the economy and demographics they are far, far, far too valuable. In WW1 the world was different and you could just sacrifice tons of young men, because there were so children rich families back then.
Great commentary! Carpatho-Rusyns support Ukraine. May the Christ of Wisdom and Redemption (Icon) bring an end to kaputin’s aggression and bring a just peace to Ukraine with the return of all its territories and its kidnapped children. May Our Lady of Zarvanytsia comfort all who are grieving the loss of loved ones and help the sick and injured to recover. May Blessed James Strepar of Lviv intercede with God to help Ukraine in its hour of need
I don’t understand, why does Ukraine have a manpower shortage when it is the Russian army that has unsustainable losses? Are Ukraine’s losses sustainable? If so why do they have a shortage of manpower? I’m confused. Please make it make sense
I'd be very wary of the MoD reported Russian casualty figures. They might have reached 2,000 on a few days, but more than likely they are about 200 a day.
Doesn't work that way. They've run through the prime age military recruits They've run through the prewar stockpile of materiel. This thing ends, one way or another, by 2026
Russia is a big country, but its a vast empty void, or dirthole if you wish. GDP size of italy at twice the population. And Italy is pretty near the bottom. 😂
Honestly… The times has been pumping out how terrible the situation is for Putin and Russia for two years plus how the whole war was on the brink of collapse along with Russia and Putin. This narrative has continually failed to materialise… Making the times an unreliable Source I would love their narrative to be true…
If you think the narrative has failed you're not looking at the actual facts. And it's like you want to pretend that Russia doesn't have a history of crumbling to pieces
I agree to an extent. I think that's partially RUclips hyperbole, with a sprinkling of preferred western narrative. That being said, "collapse" in these scenarios takes a long time. Russia has a deep well of resources but still cracks are showing. 2 mobilisations, emptying prisons, 40% of the economy on the military and relying on NK soldiers to plug gaps. Russia is struggling in this war immensely. That's not to say things are rosy for Ukraine in the slightest.
They assumed Putin wouldn't want to have 25% interest rates, inflation in double digits, and having to barter for lentils. They also assumed he wouldn't want to deplete the entire Soviet era materiel stocks. They're not out of bullets and tanks and artillery, but they are incredibly close to running out. Got it?
@@raydunn2582😂 you really have no clue what's going on. Ukraine have been pulling their own people off the streets for a long time. Google down syndrome voha and you might wake up.
@@raydunn2582Wtf..🤦♂️Even the western Empire of Lies and their Propaganda-Agenda can t hide that,and the Mainstream Media wrote/talked about...The Ukronazistan-Regime catch the people from everywhere against their will, and bring them to the frontlines....So many videos proof it....
@@raydunn2582 That isn't really true. Ukraine conscripts people all the time that do not want to be there. That's just war though, but we mustn't lie to make ourselves feel better. Ukraine has a people shortage and a resource shortage, but they can do something about the people shortage and aren't.
No I dont think it's 300k somewhere close to 30-35k Russian/NK casualties since the kursk operation started. But don't quote me on that. I have been keeping up with what's been going on in kursk since its started and watched alot of isr/drone footage from kursk. Russia is losing a lot of troops and equipment, its same thing every day. Sad, but it is what it unfortunately is. Not that I feel bad for Russia.
I watched a company or more of NK Soldiers get wiped out in less than a hours. Which is mind boggling. I served for 23 years in US Army and I've seen alot but what I'm seeing the Russians do on the battlefield defies logic and appears absent of rational thought.
It's always like the operation is successful but the patient died. I am at a loss as to understand what's happening. At the rate zelensky should be close to Moscow. I think ukraine is the lab. for the west's Ordnance.
in Britain we have an ability to talk about several things at once , that maybe an alien concept to you. now be a good boy and get back in your trench and wait for your unelected overlord to tell you to charge into a machine gun. Peasant
"Absolutely staggering..." the newest catch phrase.... meat waves... etc.... The losses aren't as bad as claimed. Not talking about Ukraine's losses and desertions is a bit ridiculous. The lack of balance is blinding...
This Aussie is completely wrong headed about Ukrainian Command Levels above Brigade. There is NO coordinated leadership where a Division or Corps should be. Now I will also state, ALL Ukrainian Command Level Staffs from Battalion to Corps lack NATO quality. This is why Ukraine’s best Brigades used in the Kursk Offensive went in too many directions without supporting each other’s Objectives. This was a problem in seemingly successful Offensive Operations by Ukraine in 2022 in Kharkiv and Kherson.
Another lunatic from the Times Radio all-lunatic cast. "Kursk operation is one of the biggest Ukrainian victories." Zelenskyy. If this unmitigated disaster for Ukraine is "one of the biggest Ukrainian victories", it's even scary to imagine how Ukrainian defeats look like.
@@101wildgoose Are you that deranged? Zelenskyy wasted 51,000 lives of his remaining troops on this PR stunt while vital places at the front near Pokrovsk, for example, are crumbling. It's the dumbest and the most expensive PR stunt in history.
I come here to listen to what the left half of the bell curve has to say. The comments are pure delusion and the guests are fantastical. 2 thumbs up for entertainment value.
If you want to be technically correct, your title should be "Kiev reports Staggering Losses for Russia". This way you are reporting TRUTH. The way you write your title is written currently, you are reporting a something that at the very minimum is very quetionable. For example, US Department of Defense reports very different numbers for losses of the two countries and you are de facto saying the USA numbers are wrong. No need to get in hot water! Say that these numbers are the claims of Kiev!
Times Radio, you have been putting out these doom for Putin headlined videos for the last 3 years, any minute now, his regime is about to collapse.... and on and on. Find some new way of discussing this situation, otherwise these hollow headlines start to look like hopeful propaganda.
There are several sources. One of them looks at satellite images where grave yards pop up. Or expand. The numbers are huge but Russia doesn't care. They will not until it's one or two million. Russia has always been that way. But their resources are running short. Even if Russia wins the war. They will have long term costs. Their economy and infrastructure will take a long time to recover. Before that they will be at war with others. Russia is done win or lose.
What would a Russian bot know about truth? Russia - a country where your tv channels consist of 24hr state ran propaganda and lies. A country where the internet is suppressed, where you jail people for speaking their mind. It's a cruddy little dictatorship.
Over 6 million Ukrainians have left, because they could afford to, or had an opportunity. With that in mind, the folks who have dug in are amazing.
Thank You Maj. General. Thank You.
This guy is brilliant 👏 please, interview him more! Wealth of information
Russia mobilize 30 million soldiers in world war 2 and Russia lost 26 million soldiers in World war 2. Russia has the capacity . Ukraine only has 40 million population. 😅
@miteshghadi3146 sure but Putin can't just have half of all his male population dead in a year. Not sure what this point means?
@miteshghadi3146 The Soviet Union was fighting a war of national survival in 1941-1945. Over a third of their armed forces, and some of their best, were Ukrainians themselves. Fighting an existential war is very different to an expeditionary one, such as their "special military operation" into Ukraine, particularly with respect to the level of sacrifice by the population. The Soviets withdrew from Afghanistan in 1989 having taken approximately 70,000 casualties, both dead and seriously wounded. Their casualties in Ukraine are currently in excess of ten times this figure.
@miteshghadi3146
That's why the Orc's need North Koreans,Mercenaries from around the world.
Ukraines are all volunteers, not paid bounces, just a low wage.
Ukraine needs to think about paying foreign fighters.
🇺🇦🇬🇧🇬🇮🇺🇦👍
@@miteshghadi3146 Russia struggling to mobilise 30,000 in a month, when losses are 45,000.
That was the USSR in WW2, not Russia & the 27 million included 19 million civilians.
Times have changed.
This is one smart Aussie
A rare person
Must have moved to Australia after his schooling in Uk 🇬🇧
@drexelspivey6472 tut tut be nice 👍
@@richardgrimbleby7853 What's the difference between an Australian and an Airbus A380....the A380 stops whining when it lands.
@@jjsmallpiece9234spoken like a true idiot😂 well done tool
Hello Kate. Always enlightening seeing the results of your questioning style. Thank you.
END THIS already with Putler running for The Exit.
🇺🇦
SLAVA UKRAINI FOREVER MORE ✌️💪🫶🤙💙💛🇺🇦💙💛♥️🙏
this 'glory to Ukraine' mantra is very tiring - pick something more rational
@Scion3Sevens your mom should have been more rational.
The Russians have called the President of Azerbaijan a rude word for a friend of Dorothy. This and the small "incident" as they call the downed aeroplane ✈️ is not earning friends.
Happy New Year! I like the information and just love Kate and her interview style.
End Putin's influence.
Cause Starmer is mr political genius right?
@@ajdailey3698 No
@@stephenlyon1358Is there any relation with the post you react to or even with this clip or do you just randomly paste this line everywhere?
@@arjan2777 Im just saying, we act like our political leaders are pefect. I asume you must be from some eutopia?
@@stephenlyon1358 Nobody is perfect but Starmer is probably more intelligent than most of them. And no I don't live in eutopia, too many people voted for corrupt and evil politicians here. You should be happy with Starmer, the alternatives were quite abysmal
.
things are not going good for russia,somthing that was ment to take 3 weeks is still going on for 3 years
Truth is Russian gains ground in Eastern Ukraine every day. In the West we would be horrified at how many men they lose to capture a ruined town.
Problem is that the Russian mind works differently. 30,000 men lost to capture a village is still a success to Russia, objective achieved in their eyes.
They've lost over a million men now in this pointless war. A million future, fathers, workers and taxpayers gone.
@@101wildgoose ´They've lost over a million men´
Classic Western Projection 101.
@livingtribunal4110 Basic maths actually. Russia has averaged losses of 1000 men a day (nearer 2000 a day at the moment, but lets average it at 1000 a day since the illegal war began).
This was confirmed by a nurse at a Russian hospital, she said 1000 men a day turn up wounded. That's just at HER hospital.
Now factor in the deaths on top of that.
War has gone on for over 1000 days, Russia losses average 1000 men a day (probably more) = 1 MILLION men dead or seriously wounded at the very least.
Russia will try to hide the true losses but it could be as high as 2 million dead and wounded. For what? So you can have some extra land? Pathetic!
😂 why not make it 2 million. People like you believe too much nonsense from western media.@@101wildgoose
@@livingtribunal4110 The minimum is 800,000 casualties KIA/WIA on the Russian side.
Classic Russian denial 101.
The long term damage done by the GOP House of Representatives in cutting off the flow of aid to Ukraine for 6 months can not be overststed. Not only were Ukrainiantroops driven from defensive positions that they might have held with proper artillery supplies, but Russia took those positions with a small fraction of the manpower and equipment losses they are suffering now assaulting what are substantially less hardened defensive positions than those they captured during the supply shortage. Even worse in the long run was the unnecessary loss of many of Ukraine's most veteran soldiers. If Russia wins this war, they should publicly thank MAGA for their success.
And the weak europeans…
@@kappenmann12 gGreat theory, but the European nations at that time did not have the stored artillery ammunition to supply Ukraine (to say nothing of the 3,000 "obsolete" Bradleys waiting to be destroyed as excess in the USA). Look at the material supply capabilities of the USA vs. all other nations supporting Ukraine combined when the GOP halted Ukrainian resupply and tell me, if you can, that Europe could have supplied a fraction, with great difficulty, of what the USA could provide easily from obsolete stocks.
I believe Harris said she wanted Ukraine to win, not that it matters now
And all along, I thought she merely wanted Harris to win.
@@CarlMartin-hw3ev Sure, comrade...
yeah this idiot has smoked himself *** thinking Biden / Harris did not support Ukraine.
Can there ever really be a winner of a war or does everyone lose.
Russian troop and kit loses have always out weighed the significance of their territorial gains. Thus, Ukraine has the upper hand.
People who dont think: nuhuh! They are like...loserizin!!!1!1
❤Ukraine ❤
Ukraine fanboy detected.
@@jamesgreen1116
@GARDENER42 weres the former over 20% of what used to be Ukraine? 😄
@@jamesgreen1116 Temporarily occupied & & under 20% actually, little Putinbot.
@@jamesgreen1116Ivan! you 🐌s have been at it for 1,045 days😮 🙏🇺🇦 Kursk and Transnistria
The dung on the land is unreal
0:54 start
"War was always here. Before man was, war waited for him. The ultimate trade awaiting its ultimate practitioner."
Cormac McCarthy, Blood Meridian
Realist Brit here. Sorry Mate from Down-Under. The mistake you're making (like almost all the commentators) is thinking in terms of casualties like in a modern war; the Russians are fighting like in WW1 and thinking about casualties in that way. Don’t forget, the British lost 19,000 killed (plus 30,000 wounded) on July 1st 1916 (Battle of the Somme) and with a population then of about 37 million, lost 2.4 of the population killed in WW1. Russia’s and North Koreas combined population is 160 million, (OK, more older people) so theoretically they’ve got at least 3 millions fighters left. The weaponry is possibly the problem, if there is one, not the personnel. The west sits back in the vain hope that Russia will totally degrade itself. The West should seize this opportunity to put a stop to the war, militarily, and put an end to the Putin regime once and for all.
I agree personel is not the problem, weaponry could get one, but surely the economy and the ruble will be a Problem for Russia. But that could be to late for Ukraine , sadly
Putin is finished. I don't think he will see this year out .
The only reason he is keeping the war he started going is he knows he has nowhere to run, will lose all of his STOLEN MONEY AND SPEND THE REST OF HIS PATHETIC LIFE IN PRISON OR ON THE END OF A ROPE.
You've heard of the nuclear stand-off? "Realistically", direct conflict, for any purpose, raises the chance of a nuclear exchange, especially with a weaker Russia and a threatened, maybe nihilistic Putin.
I would disagree and even say the personnel will be a factor. You forgot to mention, that back then in WW1, the population of Britain (and the other countries) was much younger, so much of the fighting soldiers were actually young adults. We are not in that time anymore. Russians and Ukrainians fight with older dudes. Actually, the young men are so valuable, that they are even protected from mobilization in Russia and Ukraine. That should tell you something. So, even on the paper, Russia could go on, the stark reality is, that they cannot, because they already are fighting mostly with people that would have been in retirement or in the office in WW1. Why is the age of the soldiers so important? Because the young ones are physically and mentally more able to attack and quickly get from A to Z. They can fight the whole day. A forty year old dude cannot, even if he is fit. We see that already with the Russians, they have not the strength to really go roughshod over the Ukrainans, mainly because their soldiers are too old to shoulder that kind of effort. The Ukrainians have the same problems, but they are in a general mobilisation, so they can more easily draw on the young men, but even in Ukraine the military and civil leaders are trying to not take young men too early, because for the economy and demographics they are far, far, far too valuable. In WW1 the world was different and you could just sacrifice tons of young men, because there were so children rich families back then.
Wrong. They are not being protected in RU. They are being conscripted at 18 flat out.
Great commentary! Carpatho-Rusyns support Ukraine. May the Christ of Wisdom and Redemption (Icon) bring an end to kaputin’s aggression and bring a just peace to Ukraine with the return of all its territories and its kidnapped children. May Our Lady of Zarvanytsia comfort all who are grieving the loss of loved ones and help the sick and injured to recover. May Blessed James Strepar of Lviv intercede with God to help Ukraine in its hour of need
I share your call for a peaceful future but you shouldn't idealize God. It's humans who are responsible.
I don’t understand, why does Ukraine have a manpower shortage when it is the Russian army that has unsustainable losses? Are Ukraine’s losses sustainable? If so why do they have a shortage of manpower? I’m confused. Please make it make sense
Putin wanted to see where n k soldiers stand 😂😂😂it shame for Russia
I'd be very wary of the MoD reported Russian casualty figures. They might have reached 2,000 on a few days, but more than likely they are about 200 a day.
Military Summary, Weeb Union, DPA for daily updates and mapping
Putin better get more North Koreans !
Russia is huge but it has a population of only about 150,000,000. Well, now that minus about 800,000. 😂
Sad thing is if you do the math, Russia could probably keep this up for about 100 years maybe two
Math is your weak point. 2 + 2 = 1 ??
Explain to me how you came up with that math?
er no , nowhere near 100 years . . . . . . .
Doesn't work that way.
They've run through the prime age military recruits
They've run through the prewar stockpile of materiel.
This thing ends, one way or another, by 2026
Russia is a big country, but its a vast empty void, or dirthole if you wish. GDP size of italy at twice the population. And Italy is pretty near the bottom. 😂
Trump will lose interest rather quickly....
Rooting for him to fail, i see. You're a special type of person.
@@christopherkelly233 he’s not wrong tho - America never ever finish there dinner
@@christopherkelly233 Lying Trump and lying Putin are not good at all because they live on lies.
Maybe, but he it won't be until he is assured the situation is stable and no longer an international/existential threat to the status quo
@@Smallz-x7rwhat has your country brought to the table?
The name: Iran
The aussie 'expert': eye räään
This commentator bobs up and down so distractingly. What's wrong with him? Got to 9:00 and couldn't watch longer. shame - Kate's a great interviewer.
Been saying this for nearly 3 years.
3 years into this 3-day War..
"Everything is going according to plan"
And RU has been failing for 3yrs, whats your point?
Putin to ask Trump for 250,000 us troops to fight alongside Russian troops against Ukraine. 😂😂😂
You handle well conversation of Trump, keep 'failure' and 'humiliation' for those who do empower Ukraine winning.
putler must loose , no one wins in this war . Ukraine never wanted this . Only putler wanted this , to distract his sheeple .
STOP putting the same section in twice please
Honestly… The times has been pumping out how terrible the situation is for Putin and Russia for two years plus how the whole war was on the brink of collapse along with Russia and Putin.
This narrative has continually failed to materialise… Making the times an unreliable Source
I would love their narrative to be true…
If you think the narrative has failed you're not looking at the actual facts. And it's like you want to pretend that Russia doesn't have a history of crumbling to pieces
Whatever Ivan!
I agree to an extent. I think that's partially RUclips hyperbole, with a sprinkling of preferred western narrative.
That being said, "collapse" in these scenarios takes a long time. Russia has a deep well of resources but still cracks are showing. 2 mobilisations, emptying prisons, 40% of the economy on the military and relying on NK soldiers to plug gaps.
Russia is struggling in this war immensely. That's not to say things are rosy for Ukraine in the slightest.
Wait…. Soon a potatoe costs one kilo ruble… when the welfare funds is empty
They assumed Putin wouldn't want to have 25% interest rates, inflation in double digits, and having to barter for lentils.
They also assumed he wouldn't want to deplete the entire Soviet era materiel stocks.
They're not out of bullets and tanks and artillery, but they are incredibly close to running out.
Got it?
Ukraine still refuses to fully mobilize. It's an existential war for them and they haven't sent all their man (or woman) power into the war.
Ukraine doesn't conscript people against their will or send protesters to the front lines.
They have more of a resources shortage then a people shortage
@@raydunn2582😂 you really have no clue what's going on. Ukraine have been pulling their own people off the streets for a long time. Google down syndrome voha and you might wake up.
@@raydunn2582Wtf..🤦♂️Even the western Empire of Lies and their Propaganda-Agenda can t hide that,and the Mainstream Media wrote/talked about...The Ukronazistan-Regime catch the people from everywhere against their will, and bring them to the frontlines....So many videos proof it....
@@raydunn2582 That isn't really true. Ukraine conscripts people all the time that do not want to be there. That's just war though, but we mustn't lie to make ourselves feel better. Ukraine has a people shortage and a resource shortage, but they can do something about the people shortage and aren't.
Donald Trump will probably give him a get out of jail free card!.
As Russia Lost 300k troops in kursh?
No I dont think it's 300k somewhere close to 30-35k Russian/NK casualties since the kursk operation started. But don't quote me on that. I have been keeping up with what's been going on in kursk since its started and watched alot of isr/drone footage from kursk. Russia is losing a lot of troops and equipment, its same thing every day. Sad, but it is what it unfortunately is. Not that I feel bad for Russia.
I watched a company or more of NK Soldiers get wiped out in less than a hours. Which is mind boggling. I served for 23 years in US Army and I've seen alot but what I'm seeing the Russians do on the battlefield defies logic and appears absent of rational thought.
@@travismosier4936 that’s accurate
@@MikeLopez-iv5kc i think i saw the 38k casualties number thrown around but whatever it is it's not a good thing for Russia.
@@travismosier4936 Aye, 38,000 is the figure I've seen.
It's always like the operation is successful but the patient died.
I am at a loss as to understand what's happening. At the rate zelensky should be close to Moscow. I think ukraine is the lab. for the west's Ordnance.
Instead of getting worried about shortage of gas, falling pound you are talking about Russia
it is related though
in Britain we have an ability to talk about several things at once , that maybe an alien concept to you. now be a good boy and get back in your trench and wait for your unelected overlord to tell you to charge into a machine gun. Peasant
Didn't they today capture like 50km2 of Kursk back ?
From where you have the informations ?
Times Radio has turned in to Putin radio.
Russia, winning everywhere. Times radio, desperately selling hope
Define winning
The Ukrainian lines in Kursk have collapsed.
Look at the maps
They know, they’re just in denial
@paulthomas-hh2kv I think it just war propaganda.
Let's see, how many years now has Times Radio said Putin is about to fall? GETTING BORING.
Complete nonsense figures from Zelensky's MOD.
loving the cope and strong evidence based rebuttal.
@shuathe2nd It's an evidence free claim, the same as NK troops.
All the fundamentals suggest it's not a valid claim.
"Absolutely staggering..." the newest catch phrase.... meat waves... etc.... The losses aren't as bad as claimed. Not talking about Ukraine's losses and desertions is a bit ridiculous. The lack of balance is blinding...
The Ukrainians will be out of Kursk by the end of the month at the latest. Russian losses will be about one tenth of those currently claimed.
Nice alternative reality you have there. 🤡🤡🤡
Lol. Times Radio wants to make their listeners happy with all the fantasy news
@chekeocha4923 sez the "trust me bro" guy. Hilarious ❗❗❗🤡🤡🤡
Our resident expert is back, yay!
You are one of the people who still believe Ukraine started the war 🤡
Been hearing this for a couple of years 😂
3
And I heard this was a 3-day special military operation
This Aussie is completely wrong headed about Ukrainian Command Levels above Brigade. There is NO coordinated leadership where a Division or Corps should be. Now I will also state, ALL Ukrainian Command Level Staffs from Battalion to Corps lack NATO quality. This is why Ukraine’s best Brigades used in the Kursk Offensive went in too many directions without supporting each other’s Objectives. This was a problem in seemingly successful Offensive Operations by Ukraine in 2022 in Kharkiv and Kherson.
Joined YT five days ago.
How's the snow in St Petersburg?
@@GARDENER42 Everyone joins YT at a certain time. Five days after YOU joined, did everyone call you a bot?
Sources?? That sounds like something a desperate potential with a week old account would literally make up.
@AnotherPointOfView944 why is it that everyone with a young RUclips accounts likes to make things up? What's the connection?
If youre a 5 day old account ane pro Russia. Yeah you're a bot@AnotherPointOfView944
Another lunatic from the Times Radio all-lunatic cast. "Kursk operation is one of the biggest Ukrainian victories." Zelenskyy. If this unmitigated disaster for Ukraine is "one of the biggest Ukrainian victories", it's even scary to imagine how Ukrainian defeats look like.
it would look like a loss of all freedom and free speech living under a russian dictatorship.
A small force of Ukrainians marched into Russia almost unopposed and captured a huge amount of territory. How is that NOT a success in your eyes?
hahahahahahahahah
@@101wildgoose Are you that deranged? Zelenskyy wasted 51,000 lives of his remaining troops on this PR stunt while vital places at the front near Pokrovsk, for example, are crumbling. It's the dumbest and the most expensive PR stunt in history.
Vranyo
This is projection. 😅
No it's the inconvenience truth for you
How? He’s Australian.
without numbers from russia we have to rely on russian numbers. Check the number of funerals in russia though, that's the truth.
I come here to listen to what the left half of the bell curve has to say. The comments are pure delusion and the guests are fantastical. 2 thumbs up for entertainment value.
LOL 🤦♂️🤣
If you want to be technically correct, your title should be "Kiev reports Staggering Losses for Russia". This way you are reporting TRUTH. The way you write your title is written currently, you are reporting a something that at the very minimum is very quetionable. For example, US Department of Defense reports very different numbers for losses of the two countries and you are de facto saying the USA numbers are wrong. No need to get in hot water! Say that these numbers are the claims of Kiev!
Times Radio, you have been putting out these doom for Putin headlined videos for the last 3 years, any minute now, his regime is about to collapse.... and on and on. Find some new way of discussing this situation, otherwise these hollow headlines start to look like hopeful propaganda.
PROJECTION.
😂
He’s Australian you helmet
Propaganda
What part was "propaganda"?
This channel is a pure cope channel
´Staggering casualties´ yet, as usual, absolutely zero proof to substantiate the claims.
But hey, the British MoD, right? 😂
There are several sources. One of them looks at satellite images where grave yards pop up. Or expand. The numbers are huge but Russia doesn't care. They will not until it's one or two million. Russia has always been that way. But their resources are running short. Even if Russia wins the war. They will have long term costs. Their economy and infrastructure will take a long time to recover. Before that they will be at war with others. Russia is done win or lose.
No bodies either. Just keep repeating 2000 dead a day
Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
ни слова правды)))))))))))))😂😂😂😂
Kremlin boy account 🤡🤣🤡🤣🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤣🤡🤣🤡
You wish
No of course not, the Ruzzian lies is the truth eh? Your pathetic system of lies and all that is going to crumble. Sad people
What would a Russian bot know about truth?
Russia - a country where your tv channels consist of 24hr state ran propaganda and lies.
A country where the internet is suppressed, where you jail people for speaking their mind.
It's a cruddy little dictatorship.
@michaeldunham3385 yeah says Putin's lap dog i would say.