Lens (affiliate): geni.us/Vil135 EARLY-BIRD Discount 15% Direct (affiliate): bit.ly/MarkBennett135LAB Discount applies at checkout Other Lenses Mentioned (affiliates): Sony GM 135: geni.us/Sny135 or geni.us/Sny135ado Viltrox 27mm 1.2: geni.us/Viltrox27 or geni.us/Vil27ado Viltrox 75mm 1.2: geni.us/Viltrox75EMark or geni.us/Vil75Ado
The only reviewer I have heard talk about how he is a fan of this brand, and none of the "this in no way bias's my review" BS. We obviously all have bias, I love that Mark can say that, and still review the Lens well.
My wife and I aren't afraid to use non big name lenses. She's used a viltrox 85mm f1.8 for 3 years and never once had an issue. Picture quality has always been excellent
Thank you Mark! This was a great introduction. I hope maybe you’ll come back and do a full review on it after using it for a while. It sure looks like a beauty!
Totally agree that Viltrox, and some other 3rd party manufacturers, are now turning out some incredibly sharp lenses. But have we reached the limit of sharpness in the same way that we have probably maxed out on Megapixel’s? These new 3rd party lenses all seem to be large both in size and weight, following the Sigma route, whilst Sony is reducing size and weight whilst maintaining or further improving quality. Yes, they are obviously more expensive but, if you can afford it, they are much easier to carry and still work better with AF and in body stabilisation.
Unfortunately Sony and Nikon have 5x the market share for mirrorless cameras that the L mount alliance does. Probably not financially viable to make L mount lenses.
I love a good 135. I have two Pentax 135 lenses 2.5 and a 3.5 both vintage manual lenses. But this amazing. When they create zooms Sony and Sigma are in trouble. I have the 20mm Viltrox in full frame and soon I will get the photo. I hope they come out with a Lab 35 and 85.
The 75MM 1.2 is sublime. I have an XT3 and a S5ii with a Sigma 85MM 1.4 and TBH I like the bokeh and rendering of the 75MM more. Insane amount of lens for $500. Near top tier at any price.
at least it has an LCD screen unlike Sony with nothing. From Canon to Sony, this was the hardest part of the transition and I still hate using Sony lenses because of the missing lens reader.
The TTArtisan 75mm f/2 has become my favourite lens lately for how small and light it is, any FE options for a compact 135mm? - maybe an f/2.8 one or something? - This Viltrox is great but it's sooooo huge.
Well, I’m not sure of the exact number but it was pretty early. You have great content delivered in an educational and entertaining manner. Way better than that purple guy. Haha! (I’d use an emoji, but as a boomer, don’t know what they all mean).
If it didn't say Viltrox on the side, I'd think i was looking at a G master too. I knew this brand was gonna be worth keeping an eye on after seeing the quality of their 75mm aps c.
Hope they continue to make more great aps-c lenses in the future too. The 27mm and 75mm are my two most used lenses right now. Thinking about trying out their 13mm and 56mm f1.4. But happy to see they are also making strides in the full frame world!
It's a lot smaller and lighter. My Samyang 35-150 weighs 1,315g, whereas my Samyang 135/1.8 is 901g. The 135 seems small and light after I've been using the 35-150 for a while.
Nice Lens but I can’t wait for this lens. Not sure if Viltrox has some type of agreement that slows down creating AF Lenses for L-Mount but oh well, missed opportunity.
the quality of the glass are amazing, even amazing at that price point! but I think if you're shooting sport/action stuff, the GM probably would outshine viltrox in AF factor, if fast AF is not a priority, this lens is totally worth to buy against GM
Viltrox is making some amazing lenses. I, for one, love 16mm 1.8. But this one is a miss. With Samyang 135 1.8 being a bit cheaper, much lighter (even lighter than G-master) and just as sharp or sharper according to some reports, I cannot see a reason why one would choose this behemoth of a lens.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Will check the detailed comparison when it comes out. However, it's difficult to be a class above the lens that is already nearly flawless. The weaker part of the Samyang is supposed to be the AF. Maybe it's not super fast from infinity to close, but for me it focused on flying bats in virtual darkness, and not just against a clear sky ).
For people on a budget it might be a better choice than the Sony version but the Sony 135mm is the sharpest and highest quality lens I've ever used. I have the 50mm 1.4 GM and 35mm 1.4 GM also but that 135mm gm is just ridiculously sharp and A step above and it's so fun to use.
this F1.8 lens has the same depth of field as any other F1.8 lens. The aperture value is the absolute variable, not the focal length as many people fondly think. In practice, it is not possible to maintain the focus distance when changing the focus if I need to have the same composition. A longer focal length therefore requires a greater focus distance which compensates for the depth of field to the same value. The focus of the lens only affects the perspective. The depth of field is determined only by the physical aperture number. So I always get more background blur with the 50/1.4 lens than with the 85/1.8 or 135/1.8. Not only a practical but also a mathematical proof can be provided :-)
Otherwise, I agree that the lens is amazing. I already own the FE 16/1.8 and found that the LCD is useful when shooting the night sky when the camera is pointed upwards :-)
I haven’t tested the Samyang, but I do find that samyang generally has more flare and ghosting due to the lens coatings. my guess is that this Viltrox will be better optically because it’s s good as the GM. but I can’t be sure without side-by side. Dustin Abbot owns the Samyang 135 and prefers the optics of this Viltrox. But it’s a lot bigger
Mark, I forgot in which video you showed K&F concept CPL filter. Could you recommend me which one to get? I only want CPL filter that doesn’t reduce image quality
I shoot tons of RE, both photo and video - picked up the Viltrox 16mm 1.8 to leave on my ZV-E1 so I didn't have to use my photo wide-angle zoom.... It's sharper than anything that I had at that focal length... NO focus breathing....autofocus works very well, not that I use it... Everything renders beautifully. Wow. $550. It's a tad heavy, but no big deal - balances on my gimbal with no problem.
Another well-made video! Thank you Mark! I'm glad I decided not to wait for the Viltrox a few months ago. I bought the Samyang 135mm F1.8, it is currently significantly cheaper. It's almost half as heavy and it's sharper! And for all DxO users; There is a lens module for the Samyang.
It looks good. Christopher Frost reckons the Samyang is slightly sharper, and a bit cheaper but has no aperture ring. Tough choices. I’m looking forward to their zooms. I’d love a 18-50 F2,8 or something like that.
I was able to get the Samyang for $540 from Amazon during Prime Days last year. For me, it is good enough that it would be difficult to justify replacing it with the Viltrox.
Viltrox didn't "blow" anyone "out of the water". Christopher Frost found the Viltrox to be roughly comparable to Samyang's 135/1.8. Viltrox just released the lens and is already discounting it to compete.
he didn’t say that. he said it’s as sharp. go watch Dustin’s Abbots review - he actually compared the two. The difference is striking. Viltrox has a 7 day early bird price.
I owned the Viltrox 75mm , absolutely tack sharp , DOWNSIDE Viltrox lenses are so HEAVY . If your younger get Viltrox lenses , I’m 70 now and it was the weight that made me get smaller lighter lenses .
Could you share a Dropbox link to images comparing sharpness, CA, etc. to the GM to help with decisions for ourselves? (And if you could compare the Samyang/Rokinon 135mm f/1.8, even better 🙂) Would be much appreciated. Thanks for the review.
I'm a big fan of the physical markings on aperture rings, and the thing that concerns me here is that you have to turn on the camera to know the aperture setting. Also, the primary focus on the information screen is distance and not aperture; plus there are three pieces of information to look at on the screen, which doesn't make it so straightforward. But it's easy to be a couch critic. I'd take the lens any day regardless if I could afford lenses like they were a dime a dozen of course. 😆
Any comparison to the Samyang 135 1.8? I got it used through Amazon and have shot basketball with it as well as portraits. Typically shooting it from the corner, tracking / af is good with my a7iv, but it struggles on the a7iii. I’ve considered the Sony, but can’t justify 2k, and I think Sigma’s 135 is a little older (I think emount adapted). Might try and take this one for a spin!
I have the Sigma 135mm f/1.8 Art lens, but it's in Nikon F-mount. I still have a D810, but I rarely use it opting to use my Nikon Z7 or other full-frame Sony Alpha cameras instead. When I went to use the Sigma lens, I have to use an adapter which is...fine, I guess. I recently ordered this new Viltrox lens and plan to sell my Sigma. Do you think the Viltrox is as good as the Sigma optically (i know you said it was up there with Sony and Sigma)? I mean, really as good or just kind of in the same ballpark? Also, do you think the auto-focus is reliable? I get that it's fast, but fast is worthless unless it's reliable. I'd be interested in opinions since the reviews I've seem compare it to the Sony lens, but I haven't seen any comparisons (real comparisons, not just side mentions) with the Sigma Art lens.
The Samyang seems tp be a great lens, but the coatings on Samyang lenses aren't usually this good so you'll get more ghosting and lack of contrast in certain situations. But I'll try to get it in for a comparison
We definitely need more companies pushing the prices down,… most ppl can’t. Afford shg* all so why would things keep going up in price if ppl stop buying the 2100 dollar lens. Let’s keep pushing n helping companies like this so that they want to have lower prices. Anyways. Well done, looks gr8 I’d use it for my nighttime videos outdoors for sure. Looks fun!
01:43 Saddam Hussein selling churros ? Great video, definitely a lens on the shortlist. Curious at what price it will be in China, GM 135/1.8 used mint is US$ 1000, maybe the closest competitor.
As much as I want every prime GM lens I can't justify $2100 for a focal length I probably won't use a lot. $899 for a product almost as good seems like a fair trade though.
@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Certain Sigma lenses can. It depends on the quality of the motors. Sony's recent lenses have the best motors. Nikon's lenses have the best optical quality. These other lenses may be cheaper, but there is still no "free lunch" in engineering. The only reason to buy a Viltrox is price.
As per Christopher Frost the SAMYANG 135mm 1.8 is sharper than this lens, same AF speed and accuracy. The Samyang is a bit "more" prone to flare but it's around 150USD cheaper.
Lens (affiliate): geni.us/Vil135 EARLY-BIRD Discount 15%
Direct (affiliate): bit.ly/MarkBennett135LAB Discount applies at checkout
Other Lenses Mentioned (affiliates):
Sony GM 135: geni.us/Sny135 or geni.us/Sny135ado
Viltrox 27mm 1.2: geni.us/Viltrox27 or geni.us/Vil27ado
Viltrox 75mm 1.2: geni.us/Viltrox75EMark or geni.us/Vil75Ado
Viltrox is getting sharper and cheaper. I used to believe top 1 sharpness would be Sigma, but Viltrox is now competing aggressively!
@@grimlightwildoutdoors at that price and performance, I have no complaints.
Honestly, one of the most exciting photography gear manufacturers out there right now
By far! Not only do they just keep releasing lens after lens, they're all great in quality and especially in value!
Small, fast, and cheap. You only get to pick two. Looks like Viltrox decided on Fast and Cheap. Here for it.
The only reviewer I have heard talk about how he is a fan of this brand, and none of the "this in no way bias's my review" BS. We obviously all have bias, I love that Mark can say that, and still review the Lens well.
Dang, it keeps up with G master. Viltrox is helping the average consumer experience real quality on a realistic budget.
It's soooo good!!
this is the reason I love sony emount. we as consumers, have choices
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis autofocus?
My wife and I aren't afraid to use non big name lenses. She's used a viltrox 85mm f1.8 for 3 years and never once had an issue. Picture quality has always been excellent
What about autofocus?
@@justinburley8659 works perfectly
Is she on Sony?
I got my 75 last week and still haven't really wrapped my mind around it. So great
Thank you Mark! This was a great introduction. I hope maybe you’ll come back and do a full review on it after using it for a while. It sure looks like a beauty!
Yes - I'll revisit it for sure after some more experience.
Wow, that's a serious chunk of glass! Thanks for another one of these!
Totally agree that Viltrox, and some other 3rd party manufacturers, are now turning out some incredibly sharp lenses. But have we reached the limit of sharpness in the same way that we have probably maxed out on Megapixel’s? These new 3rd party lenses all seem to be large both in size and weight, following the Sigma route, whilst Sony is reducing size and weight whilst maintaining or further improving quality. Yes, they are obviously more expensive but, if you can afford it, they are much easier to carry and still work better with AF and in body stabilisation.
That's why I'd say there's room for both.
That lens looks physically huge! Not what I’m looking for lol! Thank you for the information.
haha - it is big!!
go Viltrox go..!!!!
I wish Viltrox would join the L-Mount alliance. They make really good glass imo.
Unfortunately Sony and Nikon have 5x the market share for mirrorless cameras that the L mount alliance does. Probably not financially viable to make L mount lenses.
@@Mirza-dg3ur I bet Viltrox does but will take their blessed time.
I love a good 135. I have two Pentax 135 lenses 2.5 and a 3.5 both vintage manual lenses. But this amazing. When they create zooms Sony and Sigma are in trouble. I have the 20mm Viltrox in full frame and soon I will get the photo. I hope they come out with a Lab 35 and 85.
And 50mm1.2 :)
The 75MM 1.2 is sublime. I have an XT3 and a S5ii with a Sigma 85MM 1.4 and TBH I like the bokeh and rendering of the 75MM more. Insane amount of lens for $500. Near top tier at any price.
This would be insane if Canon allows Viltrox to introduce this lens to the RF mount.
Not in this life.
@@Vlay76 When it comes to lenses, every-one knows that Canon don't care about their customers that have brought their R series bodies!
@michaelgardner6687 Exactly!
at least it has an LCD screen unlike Sony with nothing. From Canon to Sony, this was the hardest part of the transition and I still hate using Sony lenses because of the missing lens reader.
Interesting!!
Great job on the video Mark! Thanks for making it.
The TTArtisan 75mm f/2 has become my favourite lens lately for how small and light it is, any FE options for a compact 135mm? - maybe an f/2.8 one or something? - This Viltrox is great but it's sooooo huge.
The Tamron 70-180 vxd f2.8 g2 could be an option?
80,000 subs!!! Awesome! I’m #4. That’s how long I’ve been one of your fans!
Number 4!! haha!
Well, I’m not sure of the exact number but it was pretty early. You have great content delivered in an educational and entertaining manner. Way better than that purple guy. Haha! (I’d use an emoji, but as a boomer, don’t know what they all mean).
This might be my next lens to review. Great video. You sold me on this one.
it beefy - but excellent
Great review - Thank you!!
If it didn't say Viltrox on the side, I'd think i was looking at a G master too. I knew this brand was gonna be worth keeping an eye on after seeing the quality of their 75mm aps c.
Pre-ordered. Haven't been this excited for a lens since the Sigma 105 1.4
It's so great
you can buy almost 3 of these for the price of one G-Master.... that's insane
Would love to see how this lens pairs up with some smaller, APS-C bodies like the FX30 or A6700. Regardless, it's a big step up from Viltrox!
At 200mm it's quite a long working range. I tried the 135mm f1.8 Sigma for this purpose and barely had a use case. What would be your use case?
Hope they continue to make more great aps-c lenses in the future too. The 27mm and 75mm are my two most used lenses right now. Thinking about trying out their 13mm and 56mm f1.4. But happy to see they are also making strides in the full frame world!
Those APS-C lenses are so great
Yes, 13mm f1.4 is also very good! sharp at f1.4
If it’s dark out I’d just look at the screen or through the EVF. Not a fan of screens on lenses but still love Viltrox.
Yeah - I’m on the fence
I seriously thought from the appearance and size alone that this is a 35-150mm f2-2.8 because it looks very similar!
It's a lot smaller and lighter. My Samyang 35-150 weighs 1,315g, whereas my Samyang 135/1.8 is 901g. The 135 seems small and light after I've been using the 35-150 for a while.
No onion ring effect are absolutely WOW factor !!
Imagine having this as your travel camera and your friends ask.... "where was this photo taken?" 😂
viltrox should get into zoom lenses. Think they could do really well
Agreed!!
Saddam Hussein selling burritos at 1:41
Viltrox are like that one kid who goes to the gym for a year and comes back big and cool af lol
Nice Lens but I can’t wait for this lens. Not sure if Viltrox has some type of agreement that slows down creating AF Lenses for L-Mount but oh well, missed opportunity.
Missed opportunity for the lens bootup to say 'like & subscribe'.
dammitalltohell!!
I need this and the sigma 14 1.4 to complete my everything!
the quality of the glass are amazing, even amazing at that price point! but I think if you're shooting sport/action stuff, the GM probably would outshine viltrox in AF factor, if fast AF is not a priority, this lens is totally worth to buy against GM
agreed
Does subject tracking work?
How is this compared to the Samyang 135mm?
check out dustin abbot's review - he compared them directly
Can’t wait for the Viltrox 85 f1.2 LAB Lens…speaking of 135’s, I love my Samyang 135mm f1.8, half of the weight and superb quality
Viltrox is making some amazing lenses. I, for one, love 16mm 1.8. But this one is a miss. With Samyang 135 1.8 being a bit cheaper, much lighter (even lighter than G-master) and just as sharp or sharper according to some reports, I cannot see a reason why one would choose this behemoth of a lens.
Dustin Abbot compared it to the Samyang and felt the Viltrox was a class above
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Will check the detailed comparison when it comes out. However, it's difficult to be a class above the lens that is already nearly flawless. The weaker part of the Samyang is supposed to be the AF. Maybe it's not super fast from infinity to close, but for me it focused on flying bats in virtual darkness, and not just against a clear sky ).
bluetooth built into the lens is crazyyy
For people on a budget it might be a better choice than the Sony version but the Sony 135mm is the sharpest and highest quality lens I've ever used. I have the 50mm 1.4 GM and 35mm 1.4 GM also but that 135mm gm is just ridiculously sharp and A step above and it's so fun to use.
You get that for the mighty Nikon Z-Mount? All the other narrower mounts are for Mickey Mouse 😅
this F1.8 lens has the same depth of field as any other F1.8 lens. The aperture value is the absolute variable, not the focal length as many people fondly think. In practice, it is not possible to maintain the focus distance when changing the focus if I need to have the same composition. A longer focal length therefore requires a greater focus distance which compensates for the depth of field to the same value. The focus of the lens only affects the perspective. The depth of field is determined only by the physical aperture number. So I always get more background blur with the 50/1.4 lens than with the 85/1.8 or 135/1.8. Not only a practical but also a mathematical proof can be provided :-)
Otherwise, I agree that the lens is amazing. I already own the FE 16/1.8 and found that the LCD is useful when shooting the night sky when the camera is pointed upwards :-)
This or samyang 135mm or the sigma 135mm ? Which do you suggest ?
At present samyang 135mm is sitting on my cart at 625$
I haven’t tested the Samyang, but I do find that samyang generally has more flare and ghosting due to the lens coatings. my guess is that this Viltrox will be better optically because it’s s good as the GM. but I can’t be sure without side-by side. Dustin Abbot owns the Samyang 135 and prefers the optics of this Viltrox. But it’s a lot bigger
@MarkBennettCameraCrisis thanks a lot
the Samyang is nearly half the weight of the viltrox
I have the samyang and my partner has the sigma for Canon. I prefer the Samy.
Mark, I forgot in which video you showed K&F concept CPL filter. Could you recommend me which one to get? I only want CPL filter that doesn’t reduce image quality
Sigma 105 1.4 is the Best Portrait Lens to me
a great argument to be made for that lens for sure!!
Awesome question is how well is it seal and does it get moisture easy.
Samyang 135 1.8 FE AF for similar price and 772 g vs viltrox 1235 g?
Dustin abbot compared them and felt the Viltrox was a much superior lens
I shoot tons of RE, both photo and video - picked up the Viltrox 16mm 1.8 to leave on my ZV-E1 so I didn't have to use my photo wide-angle zoom.... It's sharper than anything that I had at that focal length... NO focus breathing....autofocus works very well, not that I use it... Everything renders beautifully. Wow. $550. It's a tad heavy, but no big deal - balances on my gimbal with no problem.
I love hearing about Viltrox coming out with new amazing lenses. I want them and sigma to be aggressively competitive
Features are nice, but needs more work for me to buy. Rather also have a variable for the longer focal lengths or just do a 85mm prime.
Another well-made video! Thank you Mark! I'm glad I decided not to wait for the Viltrox a few months ago. I bought the Samyang 135mm F1.8, it is currently significantly cheaper. It's almost half as heavy and it's sharper! And for all DxO users; There is a lens module for the Samyang.
But who really wants sharp portraits? IMO, the Lensbaby Velvet 85mm is my favorite for portraits. Amazing blue where you want it.
It looks good. Christopher Frost reckons the Samyang is slightly sharper, and a bit cheaper but has no aperture ring. Tough choices.
I’m looking forward to their zooms. I’d love a 18-50 F2,8 or something like that.
I haven't used the Samyang - but if it's sharper, then it must be insanely sharp
I was able to get the Samyang for $540 from Amazon during Prime Days last year. For me, it is good enough that it would be difficult to justify replacing it with the Viltrox.
@@dpfreedman My memory says I got it that cheap as well, but when I look back though my receipts, it says $540. 🤷♂
Viltrox didn't "blow" anyone "out of the water". Christopher Frost found the Viltrox to be roughly comparable to Samyang's 135/1.8. Viltrox just released the lens and is already discounting it to compete.
he didn’t say that. he said it’s as sharp. go watch Dustin’s Abbots review - he actually compared the two. The difference is striking. Viltrox has a 7 day early bird price.
Mark was referring to the splash when you drop the lens in the water due to the weight.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis OK, I'm convinced. Keeping my Samyang, though.
@@HappeningPhotosstill a great lens!!
Best intro ever.
😂
I owned the Viltrox 75mm , absolutely tack sharp , DOWNSIDE Viltrox lenses are so HEAVY . If your younger get Viltrox lenses , I’m 70 now and it was the weight that made me get smaller lighter lenses .
Could you share a Dropbox link to images comparing sharpness, CA, etc. to the GM to help with decisions for ourselves? (And if you could compare the Samyang/Rokinon 135mm f/1.8, even better 🙂) Would be much appreciated. Thanks for the review.
I love my viltrox 85mm 1.8 takes great pictures.
Would be a very interesting pair with an APS-C Format like the a6700 or Fuji XS20 :)
That LCD screen to me tells me, when it goes wrong, it will be a very expensive fix.
I'm a big fan of the physical markings on aperture rings, and the thing that concerns me here is that you have to turn on the camera to know the aperture setting. Also, the primary focus on the information screen is distance and not aperture; plus there are three pieces of information to look at on the screen, which doesn't make it so straightforward. But it's easy to be a couch critic. I'd take the lens any day regardless if I could afford lenses like they were a dime a dozen of course. 😆
Yes - I think I will likely use this lens in A and control the aperture from the camera dials
I wish Viltrox made something to compete with Sony 70-350mm zoom lens.
what are your toughts about using this lens on a aps-c camera?
it’ll be really big!! I’d prefer the Viltrox 75 for portraits on apsc
Outstanding! Hope they'll make zoom lenses...
Me too!!
...And sell them as gym equipment.
@@rhalfik😂
@rhalfik I think Tamron and Sigma do that already. Sigma 200-500 f/2.8? 35lbs.
Time to add a 2nd lens to the Viltrox collection 😏
That’s an amazing lens and price!
Will this be compatible or coming out for the z mount
hopefully
Any comparison to the Samyang 135 1.8? I got it used through Amazon and have shot basketball with it as well as portraits. Typically shooting it from the corner, tracking / af is good with my a7iv, but it struggles on the a7iii. I’ve considered the Sony, but can’t justify 2k, and I think Sigma’s 135 is a little older (I think emount adapted). Might try and take this one for a spin!
yes, I compared it to the samyang ruclips.net/video/2MekSHJu33Y/видео.htmlsi=3NZ_3EIiGb6Z0lIn
Wooooow amazing
Next let’s wait Viltrox release a fullframe 1.2 :)
I have the Sigma 135mm f/1.8 Art lens, but it's in Nikon F-mount. I still have a D810, but I rarely use it opting to use my Nikon Z7 or other full-frame Sony Alpha cameras instead. When I went to use the Sigma lens, I have to use an adapter which is...fine, I guess. I recently ordered this new Viltrox lens and plan to sell my Sigma. Do you think the Viltrox is as good as the Sigma optically (i know you said it was up there with Sony and Sigma)? I mean, really as good or just kind of in the same ballpark? Also, do you think the auto-focus is reliable? I get that it's fast, but fast is worthless unless it's reliable. I'd be interested in opinions since the reviews I've seem compare it to the Sony lens, but I haven't seen any comparisons (real comparisons, not just side mentions) with the Sigma Art lens.
How does it compare to the Samyang counterpart? It's same price on Amazon.
The Samyang seems tp be a great lens, but the coatings on Samyang lenses aren't usually this good so you'll get more ghosting and lack of contrast in certain situations. But I'll try to get it in for a comparison
and my L-MOUNT KEEPS CRYING!
I will always stay with Sigma/Sony Lenses
can’t go wrong with that
That price is amazing, the focus is a huge A+ I have the Bokeh Master and is a pain to focus on it.
We definitely need more companies pushing the prices down,… most ppl can’t. Afford shg* all so why would things keep going up in price if ppl stop buying the 2100 dollar lens. Let’s keep pushing n helping companies like this so that they want to have lower prices.
Anyways.
Well done, looks gr8
I’d use it for my nighttime videos outdoors for sure.
Looks fun!
Anyone got news on the Yngnuo 85 f1.2 e mount they were rumoring months ago?
I have 4 Viltrox lens for Nikon Z sistem and all is perfect! Can't wait this for Nikon Z! Viltrox, shut up and take my money !!!!!!
Is this sharper than the Samyang 135 FE 1.8 that I recently bought? :(
The Samyang is just as sharp - that's still a great value and much lighter
01:43 Saddam Hussein selling churros ? Great video, definitely a lens on the shortlist. Curious at what price it will be in China, GM 135/1.8 used mint is US$ 1000, maybe the closest competitor.
5499cny
5499cny
@@周舟-m4u Used Sony GM on Idle Fish 6800.
Lmao 🤣
The lack of cats-eye bokeh indicates that the lens is overbuilt for its sensor size. Will this be released for GFX?
Viltrox just proof they can have good quality premium lens with cheaper price compared to 1st party lenses..
So only Sony mount?
for now, yes
@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Yay, Sony guys get all the fun toys
It would be interesting to see this one compared to the Samyang.
Viltrox use to make budget lenses. Now they are taken the path of Sigma and Tamron. Make lenses expensive but just a couple dollars cheaper than GM.
As much as I want every prime GM lens I can't justify $2100 for a focal length I probably won't use a lot. $899 for a product almost as good seems like a fair trade though.
your link does not lead me to the lens.....but everything else on amazon....not good
you were right - stupid link was broken. Ugh. Fixed it now.
nothing for Canon EF?
no manufacturers will be making EF glass going forward
Can the motors keep up with the 120fps of the A9iii?
No - only sony lenses can do that. all 3rd party lenses are capped at 15 fps
@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Certain Sigma lenses can. It depends on the quality of the motors. Sony's recent lenses have the best motors. Nikon's lenses have the best optical quality. These other lenses may be cheaper, but there is still no "free lunch" in engineering. The only reason to buy a Viltrox is price.
Seems cool, but id like something more flexable then a fixed 135.
yes - very specific focal length
Fast, cheap and produce ultra flat and non appealing image like any other modern lens.
you can always get vintage lenses if you want optical character, but having a technically sound lens is important in many situations
Samyang's equivalent costs less, is almost half the weight and image quality is stellar. There's absolutely nothing going for Viltrox with this lens.
They're both excellent lenses.
As per Christopher Frost the SAMYANG 135mm 1.8 is sharper than this lens, same AF speed and accuracy. The Samyang is a bit "more" prone to flare but it's around 150USD cheaper.
6:51 can't help to notice blurry corner on bottom right corner. Not big of a deal but worth mentionning
I hope viltrox makes an 18-50mm for apsc