Shukriya sir suba paper tha or yeah topic ni mil rha tha bht axha smjty hein Dua ha Allah apko or Kamyabi dy or Hmry b papers axhy say ho ja ayain Ameen Suma Ameen love you sir by ❣️❣️❣️
Yes, there are differences between general defenses to tort liability and exceptions to tort liability. General defenses to tort liability are legal principles that provide a defendant with a valid reason for why they should not be held liable for their actions. In contrast, exceptions to tort liability are situations where a plaintiff may not have a legal claim even if the defendant did commit an act that would normally give rise to liability. Here are some examples of each: General Defenses to Tort Liability Consent If a plaintiff consents to the defendant's actions, then the defendant may not be held liable for any resulting harm. For example, if a patient consents to a doctor performing a medical procedure that carries some risk of harm, then the patient cannot later sue the doctor if they suffer harm from the procedure. Self-Defense If a defendant acted in self-defense, then they may not be held liable for any harm that they caused to the plaintiff. For example, if someone is being attacked and they use reasonable force to defend themselves, then they cannot be held liable for any injuries that the attacker suffers. Contributory or Comparative Negligence If a plaintiff's own negligence contributed to their injuries, then their damages may be reduced or eliminated altogether. For example, if a plaintiff is injured in a car accident but was not wearing their seatbelt, then their damages may be reduced because their failure to wear a seatbelt contributed to their injuries. Exceptions to Tort Liability Statute of Limitations In many jurisdictions, there is a limited amount of time in which a plaintiff can file a lawsuit for a tort. If the plaintiff waits too long, then their claim may be time-barred, and they cannot sue the defendant for the harm they suffered. Immunity Certain individuals or entities may be immune from tort liability in certain circumstances. For example, government officials may have immunity for actions taken in the course of their official duties. No Duty of Care In some situations, a defendant may not owe a duty of care to the plaintiff, and therefore cannot be held liable for any harm that the plaintiff suffered. For example, a property owner may not owe a duty of care to a trespasser who enters their property without permission. In summary, general defenses to tort liability provide reasons why a defendant should not be held liable for their actions, while exceptions to tort liability are situations where a plaintiff may not have a legal claim even if the defendant committed an act that would normally give rise to liability.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Shukriya sir suba paper tha or yeah topic ni mil rha tha bht axha smjty hein Dua ha Allah apko or Kamyabi dy or Hmry b papers axhy say ho ja ayain Ameen Suma Ameen love you sir by ❣️❣️❣️
sir aap bohaat acha pardhatay hain, bohaat shouq sai sunti hun aap k lectures, intresting bana daitay hain lectures ko aap.
Thankuh sir ap boht achi videos banaty hain
Thank you sir ❤ to delivered the Glorious lecture ❤❤
Very good discussion Sir
Mental elements of tort... Kindly make a video on this topic... Highly requested
ok
Sir ji kindly General defences in ppc pe video bana de ..or sub mai sub different defences bta de ..
JazakAllah Sir
Thanks sir
Plz cover other left topics
Sir jee example baree mazzy ha ha khas kar ke necessity wala😅😂
@@Guru_clips92 Chalo apko Maza aya . Good 😊
Sir kia leave and licence & voluntary non fit injuria are same or different ?
👌
Sir ye video just tort ke lia hi he ya Criminal law me bhi yehi krein
@@kareemraza7019 for tort
Sir is there any difference lies between general defences of tort and exception of tort? Same defences are written in exceptions
It is bit confusing
Yes, there are differences between general defenses to tort liability and exceptions to tort liability.
General defenses to tort liability are legal principles that provide a defendant with a valid reason for why they should not be held liable for their actions. In contrast, exceptions to tort liability are situations where a plaintiff may not have a legal claim even if the defendant did commit an act that would normally give rise to liability.
Here are some examples of each:
General Defenses to Tort Liability
Consent
If a plaintiff consents to the defendant's actions, then the defendant may not be held liable for any resulting harm. For example, if a patient consents to a doctor performing a medical procedure that carries some risk of harm, then the patient cannot later sue the doctor if they suffer harm from the procedure.
Self-Defense
If a defendant acted in self-defense, then they may not be held liable for any harm that they caused to the plaintiff. For example, if someone is being attacked and they use reasonable force to defend themselves, then they cannot be held liable for any injuries that the attacker suffers.
Contributory or Comparative Negligence
If a plaintiff's own negligence contributed to their injuries, then their damages may be reduced or eliminated altogether. For example, if a plaintiff is injured in a car accident but was not wearing their seatbelt, then their damages may be reduced because their failure to wear a seatbelt contributed to their injuries.
Exceptions to Tort Liability
Statute of Limitations
In many jurisdictions, there is a limited amount of time in which a plaintiff can file a lawsuit for a tort. If the plaintiff waits too long, then their claim may be time-barred, and they cannot sue the defendant for the harm they suffered.
Immunity
Certain individuals or entities may be immune from tort liability in certain circumstances. For example, government officials may have immunity for actions taken in the course of their official duties.
No Duty of Care
In some situations, a defendant may not owe a duty of care to the plaintiff, and therefore cannot be held liable for any harm that the plaintiff suffered. For example, a property owner may not owe a duty of care to a trespasser who enters their property without permission.
In summary, general defenses to tort liability provide reasons why a defendant should not be held liable for their actions, while exceptions to tort liability are situations where a plaintiff may not have a legal claim even if the defendant committed an act that would normally give rise to liability.
💗
Allah walio bsss kro kaafi a pele e