Facts of the case Cassidy v. Daily mirror newspaper Ltd (1929) is that, Mr M and Miss C were already a married couple. And the statement published by the defendant was that their engagement has been announced. The wife of Mr M pleaded that the newspaper publisher is showing something like she is living with Mr M in immoral cohabitation. Therefore, the defendant were held liable. It was further held that when the words are considered to be defamatory be the persons to whom the statement is published, there is defamation, even though the person making the statement believed it to be innocent.
Thank uh so much sir. Ap ne vdo k starting 1:27 m hi doubt clear kr diya ...meko lga tha slander IPC m nhi aaata nd tort m bhi special injury dikhane pr compensation milega
Sir a biggggggg thanku we have exam 15 days after our addmission because of the changes yearly exam to semester and your video help a lottt thanku again
08:57 In this case, the Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Kerala High Court. It was held that even though in view of Section 122, Indian Evidence Act, the complainant cannot seek to support his case upon the evidence of the wife of the accused, but if the communication between the husband and the wife have fallen to his hands, the same can be proved in any other way.
Dada,1st of all thank u for the video..I'm media student. In our book we learn about 2 types of defamation Liable and Slander, is also follow in India, nd u said it's not.,, kindly clear it?
11:50 Bro KRK ne jab Radhe movie pe Review diya tha to Salman Khan ne us pe case kiya tha to iske bare men kuch batao court ne kya decision diya tha Kindly reply
If the statement is against Class of persons cannot be considered as defamation then why Rahul Gandhi defamation suit was lost, he made the comment against a class of persons with a certain Surname?
Great explanations,Sessions are interesting ,but what to write dosnt get retained,so plz rephrase the answers in brief 2-3 times in video to reiterate the learning,,,great otherwise,fan of yours
LMAO....yh aadmi aadmi kya hota hai 😂😂😂👍👍
Bohoot sahi pdhate ho aap sir...
I'm a law student from Pakistan and i love your lectures, more power to you.
I am also from Pakistan and law student the lectures are so helpful..to understand the law of torts
SAME
💓right
Lots of love from India 💕
Lot's of love from India
Sir the way you explain its amazing ...muje tort kbhi smjh nhi aata tha ..pr apki saari vedios dekhi ..aur muje smjh aagya thank you
SIR WOW KYA EXPLAIN KARTE HO AAPKA STYLE BILKUL UNIQUE H HAMRE TEACHER'S SE SAMAJ ME NAHI AATA HA AAP KA LECTURE SUBURB H SIR AMAZING I LIKE YOUR VDO
Facts of the case Cassidy v. Daily mirror newspaper Ltd (1929) is that, Mr M and Miss C were already a married couple. And the statement published by the defendant was that their engagement has been announced. The wife of Mr M pleaded that the newspaper publisher is showing something like she is living with Mr M in immoral cohabitation. Therefore, the defendant were held liable. It was further held that when the words are considered to be defamatory be the persons to whom the statement is published, there is defamation, even though the person making the statement believed it to be innocent.
I'm a student of llb first semester... Your lecture may very helpful
The way you taught this topic was EPIC ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Your videos really helped me in studying torts I was noyt able to attend my online classes but u made my work eas
Maza aagaya pheli dafa tort parh kr ❤ love from Pakistan. More power to you. 💯
Thats the awsome, amzing, 100 out 100 rating vedio Sir....💯💯
Thank uh so much sir. Ap ne vdo k starting 1:27 m hi doubt clear kr diya ...meko lga tha slander IPC m nhi aaata nd tort m bhi special injury dikhane pr compensation milega
Thanks a lot sir🙏🏿kitna simple aur easy way mein samjhaaya aapne❤️✨
Grate way to teach us …. It’s fun 😂😂😂 and knowledgeable at the same time…
Hello 👋
Wow 🤩 extreme level of presentation! 👍🏻
Apka jawab nahi ....superb explanation
Wonderful explanation….,keep it up Rao Shab ❤
6:45 it hurts but I laughed 😂😂
Point is your way of teaching is amazing 🤩🙀
Abhi 150 -200 hai followers bhut shi
Sari lecture bhut intresting hai sir
I have followed you on instagram as well as downloaded your app sir 🙏🙏you are an amazing teacher, coach ❤️❤️ thank you 🤗
Sir a biggggggg thanku we have exam 15 days after our addmission because of the changes yearly exam to semester and your video help a lottt thanku again
Best of luck for your exams
Your way of teaching is lit🔥🔥🔥
I m from afganistan. I love your lecture.
Thank you sir Your teaching is the best👍💯 I'm from arunachal but Studying in law college of HP. Kala amb
Thank you Sir.. I have to give presentation on this topic and I'm fully prepared now😁
Very nice coverage of all topics
THIS VDO IS HELPFUL IN MY EXAM 26/9/23 KI TORT 2ND SEMESTER THANKS SIR
Entertainment+knowledge 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Sir aap hamare jaise students ke liye bhagwan ho jo exam ke ek din pahle padhte hai
Sir your teaching style is so impressive sir law par ais ehi videos banate rahna plz
Huge respect from Pakistan.....our whole class listens your lectures...
Best channel for torts classes
Waahh mast tarike se pahade ho interest aata hai padhne mai
Thank you... tomorrow is my exam..🤗
Really fabulous style of teaching 🤗👍
Sir you are a very good teacher 🤩🤩🙏🏼🙏🏼🤞🤞🤞
Sir aap Gazab ho best ho amazing ho fantabulously fantabulous ho..aur kya hi bolu ab Mai
I am also LL.B. student this video help me a lot
08:57 In this case, the Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Kerala High Court. It was held that even
though in view of Section 122, Indian Evidence Act, the complainant cannot seek to
support his case upon the evidence of the wife of the accused, but if the communication
between the husband and the wife have fallen to his hands, the same can be proved in any
other way.
Outstanding lecture 👍👍
You are awesome sir😎
Ooooo
you r doing great job . thankyou so much sir .you have unique way of teaching .
Very helpful❤️and amazing video 🔥thnkewww so muchh sirr🎉
Sir, what is the limitation period to file a case?
Civil?
Criminal?
Ur way of explanation is too good and interesting so liked and subscribed ur channel. Keep doing such good work. Regards
Nice and easy explanation 👍
Thanks sir.
Very nicely, very useful &easy explain
Sb video dekha bahut acha lga Thanku
Best as always
Sir very very good ur teaching style
I'm from Bangladesh,, I love all of your class
Excellent explanation 🎉
Sir ke videos bahot lajawab hai aur saathme inka Instagram account bhi vahape mast posts dalte ho sir aap 😂
In Cassidy v daily mirror newspaper ltd the claimant is mrs.Cassidy and not Mr.cassidy
Absolutely correct what is man there is woman too. ❣️
Awesome sir,, ekdm easy explanation
Your way of teaching.... Lit😂😂
Love ❤❤ and support from Bangladesh 🇧🇩🇧🇩
Thanks Muje mains k notes bnane Mai kafi help mil rhe hi
Thank you sir for your great great great great.......teaching 🙏😇
God Bless you sir... You are a great help.
Doctor's handwriting 😂wah
Appreciated 🙃🙃
Use full video thanks sir 🙏
Happy Teacher's day😊
Thanks a lot YG Guru ❤
thankyou so much sir 😭😭😭😭 lots of loveee and more power to you
Ro mat 😂🙏🏻
Wow sir your videos are to easy to understand. # best💯 mast👍
Sir your expectations is suppebbb
Excellent 😊
Dada,1st of all thank u for the video..I'm media student. In our book we learn about 2 types of defamation Liable and Slander, is also follow in India, nd u said it's not.,, kindly clear it?
badhiya padha diya sir mauj kara di
अच्छा तो है सर !
Both aala
11:50 Bro KRK ne jab Radhe movie pe Review diya tha to Salman Khan ne us pe case kiya tha to iske bare men kuch batao court ne kya decision diya tha
Kindly reply
Examples are dammm 🤩🤩
Sir aap rk bangiya sir ki law of tort ki book se pdaya kro please 🙏🙏
book se padhate nahi hain, book se reading maarte hain, padhate tou khud ke style main hai hamesha.
Thank you sir ❤️
Sir.......thank u so much......shandar
Love u hogya sir🤩
Nice teaching sir
Sir please make a video on sec 499 of ipc & its exceptions.
You are the best.
😂😂instagram wala bhut sahi hit kiya🙏
Thankyou
I was searching your video on defamation as in IPC
Good presentation
T J Ponnen v M.C. Verghese (1970) case is not that clear to me.. what is said in evidence act. According to this case, is it defamation? or not?
It is not defamation....
Please sir btaiye ipc wale defamation aur tort wale me thoda confusion hai...
If the statement is against Class of persons cannot be considered as defamation then why Rahul Gandhi defamation suit was lost, he made the comment against a class of persons with a certain Surname?
Same question
Murder of democracy
Plz sir, a video on malicious prosecution with case studies 🙏🙏🙏
Very useful video sir 👍👍
Sir civil wrong ka case district ke civil court ke sakte hai ?
Wonderful
Great explanations,Sessions are interesting ,but what to write dosnt get retained,so plz rephrase the answers in brief 2-3 times in video to reiterate the learning,,,great otherwise,fan of yours
Cant you just rewind and rewatch?
@yg law sir he is defaming u burai krra h acche way m 🤣🤣
@@YGLAW 😆
@@YGLAW savage sir😂😂
Extremely helpful explanation🙌🏽
However, your Instagram id isn't showing.
Sorry for that, i updated the username few days ago, check the link now, it should be working now
Amazing video 👍
Superb
Very Nice
Sir ye youssoupoff v mgm pictures isme kya hua tha
Sir tort me jo defamation hota h wo jivit vykti k liye hota hai ya fir jo mr jata h usake liye bhi ho skta h
Good Job 👍
greatttt 👍