Debunking SEBTS Speakers on Climate Change
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 июл 2024
- Jon interviews Dr. Colin Reeves on two talks given at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary by Jonathan Moo and Katherine Hayhoe on the subject of Climate Change. Dr. Reeves dismantles many of the popular arguments used to convince people that Climate Change is caused by a petroleum-based economy and must be rectified through Left-wing policies, otherwise man faces apocalyptic consequences.
Dr. Colin Reeves notes: drive.google.com/file/d/1e_BA...
#climatechange #globalwarming #katherinehayhoe #sebts #jonathanmoo
00:00:00 Introduction: SEBTS Reaction
00:06:19 Katherine Hayhoe
00:33:41 Jonathan Moo
01:14:40 Dr. Reeves Closing Thoughts 
Развлечения
Hayhoe: “My many years and hours of study in climate sciences has led me to the conclusion that… the weather is getting wEiRd 🥴”
Do your research on a rebuttal and publish it in a peer-reviewed journal then
@@js1423 this video was a clear rebuttal. Additionally I am an analytical chemist and I can tell you that rebuttals to these mainstream positions do not get published in mainstream publications i.e. ACS, C&EN, The Analytical Scientist, The Scientist, etc.
@@sethevans1506 I found person with your name, but how can I verify your actually him. What's your data for that position of that state of the journals, save for your claims and lived experience? You do now that there are journals and universities outside the US as well where one can try to publish research? Academia is an international and global enterprise
@@js1423 you don’t need to verify who I am. It doesn’t really matter for the discussion at hand. If I were a car mechanic, but I was able to comprehend the data and make appropriate conclusion, the. What does my profession matter?
Academia is a great collection of many smaller studies and research performed at smaller colleges/industries, it is not mainstream. It is similar to Researchgate in that it is a decent tool but does not convey the import such as the mainstream publications.
Lastly, your position is that I need to produce my own studies and day to refute this woman, even though a proper reading and understanding of the data she cites is a refutation in itself, and I may not even be in this field, if I want to have an opinion? That is pretty ridiculous.
@@js1423 A "pal reviewed" journal you mean. There's the rub, when you can't get published because you don't fit the narrative. This is a subtle form of censorship which has been demonstrated many times. Even completely fraudulent papers get easy publishing if they fit the narrative.
My wife’s Grandfather was born around 1910. I don’t remember exactly but he told me that some winters in the 1920s were really short and then in the 30s they were long and cold and a lot of snow. This was in western Kentucky. But this climate change is a lie. Climate is always changing. They can hardly predict the weather from day to day and they want us to believe they can predict 20 or 30 years from now.
they want you to believe man is the one changing the climate so they can control you with more government regulations.
“As long as the earth endures,
seedtime and harvest,
cold and heat,
summer and winter,
day and night
will never cease.” Genesis 8:20
one of the most important podcast you have done yet. Thanks Jon
All I heard from hayhoe was false assertions, encoded language, and emotionalism . . . and a whole lot of slander.
A little bit of an aside to this climate racket stuff, why do Southern Baptist seminaries allow women to teach future pastors at all, even guest lecturers? Undermining complementarianism?
Thanks to you both. One of the best videos I have seen of the many good ones on this channel. May I say, Mr. Harris, that I think you are growing as an interviewer. Please continue to work on that patience and flexibility, notably in interviewing British people.
I cannot listen to chick for another second. Don’t know how you do it. Thank you for your service.
Jon must have an iron-clad stomach, given how much garbage he has to wade through for his podcast!
Warmer is better. Most deaths caused by weather is the cold not the heat. Plus weather has always been cyclical.
Ken Keathley says at 18:50 that he began to see armadillos in southern Missouri where he grew up, but they were never there before. He assumes that the migration of armadillos northward was a direct result of man-caused climate change. This is the same type of emotion-driven reasoning, void of necessary data and logic, that many in the charismatic world often use when discussing "miracles". It is the same problem: A serious lack of discernment (and a misunderstanding of God's sovereignty over his creation). Are there any other reasons why different animal species might migrate? Have you eliminated all other reasons for the migration before deciding that man-caused climate change is the reason? Maybe they moved to a new location for better food. Maybe they moved to escape an influx of predators. Or, maybe they moved because too many Demoncrats from California moved in. Sorry, had to put that last one in there.
I've noticed that our modern flavor of cult organizing now includes a layer of what I call "Kens and Karens". These are bubbly people who have poorly honed reasoning skills but they are excellent mouth pieces for the innermost circle of the cult. They drum up drama and anxiety to motivate the masses. That's what I see especially with Hayhoe and Keathley. That's not meant to be an insult against them, but rather a callout of exactly what they are doing whether they realize it or not.
I would love to see more videos like this. The “climate crisis” is something that is often simply proclaimed without any evidence or debate.
Trees breathe CO2 . and then give us oxygen. Drive in your big V8 cars far and more often. The satellite pictures show our planet greener now then 20 years ago.
Another reminder that the Southern Baptist seminaries that train 1/3 of the nation's pastors should be regarded as institutions in captivity as they were in the days of the legendary conservative vs. "moderate" struggle in the denomination. Jonathan Moo from BioLogos trained the future SBC ministers. BioLogos teaches theistic evolution, which is absolutely incompatible with the doctrine of the inerrancy of the Bible. Theistic evolution as far as I'm concerned marks someone as a pseudo-evangelical rather than an actual evangelical. (Yes I know that implicates Tim Keller.) No theistic evolutionist should be giving instruction at a Bible-believing seminary. Pray and fight. And we must do a better job founding institutions that will remain sound in the future instead of having an endless cycle of decay and denial before ultimate withdrawal.
Good morning from Australia!
Poor God , whatever is he going to do if the humans mess up His planet !!!!
Sarcasm can be a wonderful spiritual gift! 😃
Revelation 11:18. ..and the time came for the dead to be judged..and to destroy those who destroy the earth. So there is an answer to that question. Looks like God is not so helpless after all.
The weather’s getting weirder.
“And Leon’s getting la-a-arger.”😂
No ticks in Ontario? We have ticks in Saskatchewan where it is way colder than Ontario even if you believe “climate change” with all your heart.
I lived in Amarillo in the early 70's. We had fire ants and the winters were brutal. Lubbock isn't that far away.
There have never been fire ants in Amarillo. Still aren't. Maybe you're unfamiliar with actual fire ants.
We have been hearing since at least the early 1990s on a pretty much annual basis from the press that the preceding year was the hottest year on record or one of the few hottest years on record. Now logically speaking if this was really true and has been going on for over three decades then the baseline would have to be tremendously raised. In other words it would have to be much hotter to be the hottest year on record in the 2020s than it was in the early 1990s, and that kind of warming would have to be really perceptible. Now I don't perceive the summers to have gotten hotter at all where I live in the South. I do perceive that the winters have become milder, noticeably fewer single-digit days, and for heaven's sakes let's do nothing to reverse THAT!
If somebody is knowledgeable enough to address this point that I have about the baseline and about how the media coverage just doesn't jibe, I would appreciate it.
I don't know where you live but it is noticable. That last couple of
summers in the Texas Hill country have been unbearable. Lubbock Texas last year had over 30 days over 100. I grew up there and 100 degree days were rare.
@@beverlylewis3467So we conclude that it is noticeable in that part of one state of the country - not the entire country, let alone worldwide.
@@ZephaniahL Please do your research. It is world wide. The polar ice caps have melted. So have the glaciers in Greenland. Europe has had record heat the last 2 summers. So has Canada. I'll admit keeping your head in the sand about this is more comfortable but that won't make it go away.
@@beverlylewis3467 in my area last summer there was a period of very strong heat but nonetheless at this point the trend has definitely been moderate.
@@beverlylewis3467 See 48:24. The fourth green band represents the warming trend of this period of history.
How do you measure "global weirding?"
the weirder you are the more you are qualified to measure.
Wow I’m going to comment again. This lady compares the promotion of fossil fuels to the promotion of slavery?! She also says that your acceptance of her climate hysteria is a sign of your redemption and sanctification!?! I need to speak to her husband
In Ephesus the deforestation caused sediment to fill up the river and now 2 miles from coast.
Gotcha
He said He would never destroy it again with WATER.!
True, but in the next verse He also said "While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter shall not cease." (Genesis 8:22) Those are planet-wide promises. God can still send non-global drought or flood, extreme cold in Antarctica and at the same time extreme heat in the Sahara. There was a 7-year famine across the middle east in Joseph's day, a local famine in Ruth's time, a drought in Elijah's time, and a general dearth across the known world in the days of Claudius Caesar. Revelation 16:8 says "men were scorched with great heat", which is one of many plagues. But these cannot over-ride his promise to maintain the planet's general climate while the earth remaineth.
"While the Earth remains..." and Peter describes the entire death and rebirth of the Universe through elemental fire. We're dust of the Earth, and both must die, or be transformed in an instant, to something better.
@@JRRodriguez-nu7po Yes I think we'll watch Him melt it down and remake while we watch from the glass city floating miles above Jerusalem. I have my tickets ready.
@@user-th5rh8ro2f Not glass, diamond, a solid piece of diamond is the only things that can indeed be 1,500 miles to a side (though it could be a pyramid OR a cube or something else). Also diamonds fluoresce when exposed to cosmic rays, thus the city would need no illumination from the sun. Also transparent gold (yes, thin gold is transparent, look at visors from the moon landing) are the best protection for UV light. Plus the "orbital elevator effect"; the more science I learn the more concretely real the Bible is and the fewer metaphors I see. Yes, trees clap and sing, yes mountains skip, and yes a wife becomes the actual genetic flesh of her husband (microchimerism).
So many strawman arguments in her arguments.
Winner winner! She’s not intelligent in this matter. Not a single cohesive argument
Okay.. I don’t usually comment, but when you start with an old earth position and you don’t factor the flood, you will always come to the wrong answer. Michael Ord is a much better source for this and Dr. Andrew Snelling gives an excellent presentation on ice core interpretation. It’s very very subjective.
It’s getting weirder at the same time they’re perfecting geoengineering, wow what’re the odds
I have never understood why political or religious convictions are expected to be associated with a particular position on climate change. I think most likely human activity is having some effect on the climate, but that's just my best guess on the science, nothing more.
The climate is always changing. One example is the Romans growing grapes in northern Britain 2000 years ago to make wine, because the climate was warmer back then. Now the climate is much cooler in northern Britain so you cannot grow grapes vines at all, or it is at least harder too. Tony Heller's RUclips channel is an excellent site to get good information on this global warming, climate change, (now climate weirdness) scam that you see today.
Tony Heller is a bachelor's degree geologist with no training in climatology and that isn't even his real name. Or maybe it is and his other name isn't real. In any case, not an expert by any means.
1- when deriving a trend from a cyclical event, choosing the starting point gives you modt any future predictions you want. Actual thermometer temperatures, "unanusted", show a COOLING trend since 1920 reaching the coldest in the 1070s; when it snowed in Miami and magazines like Time were announcing the coming ice age. See Tony Heller gor massive amounts of temperature records and demonstrated recent data tampering.
2- CO2 is plant food and a rare gas (0.04% of dry air). Increased CO2 increases life throughout the planet. We're carbon based life, dilitedvin water. Hydrocarbons, fossil fuels is life trapped underground. Theore fossil guels we burn the more life on earth. Climate models fail to incorporate the negative feedback loops of photosynthesis, CaCO3 exoskeletons (corals, shellfish) and clouds. Free the dinosaurs and bring back the pre flood forests by burning MORE fosdil fuels for the health of the planet.
3- CO2 is actually a weak greenhoygas, as well as so rare as to make mo significant contribution. CO2 jas a narrow absorptive range, methane by comparison is 80x more effective at heat trapping than CO2 and water is also FAR more effective than CO2. There's no logical reason to pin any temperature change on CO2...other than money as it makes it possible to divert from CLEAN energy (fossil fuels) to extremely toxic solar panels snd bird killing windmills.
4- the climate hysteria industry is a multi trillion dollar global power grab, pun intended. Besides money, more important is power. Right now in parts of Europe farmers are revolting against the globalists. Just like the lies surrounding COVID and "trans"; the demonization of Carbon which is THE limiting element to life on Earth and something we need MORE of this is about global control.
If they can make you believe absurdities, they can make you commit atrocities.
Honestly I don’t know what to say, except that Mrs. Hayhoe needs to define her terms because some of the stuff she said sounded disjointed from the Gospel and had leftist social spin on it. Almost like they’re trying to mix Christianity with outside ideas like what Clement of Rome did back in the 2nd Century
It always amazes me that people completely uneducated in the subject know more than one of the worlds leading climatologists. Its like walking in off the street and telling a surgeon he's doing his job wrong and you watched a tv show about doctors so you know more than him.
I gotta be real, “leading climatologist” doesn’t carry much weight in a field filled with hysterical fads.
I can respect a guy for doing their work in their field, but if their field has been so compromised by grant-chasing apocalyptic investigations, it lowers the bar.
Matthew 26:11. These people don't believe the Bible.
This is an embarrassing interview between Ken and Katherine. I have a hunch the problem at SEBTS is rooted in financial corruption.
So, she accuses people of being Pharisees and blinded to her junk science and calls them unchristian. But, she's not willing to consider that she could be wrong about her beliefs and opinions..... so who's being the Pharisee about their beliefs?? Climate is cyclical and affected by the sun more than anything else. With the expansion of cities , concrete highways, and large glass skyscrapers localized climate changes can happen because all those things cause heat absorption. So cities tend to be warmer . She has the same attitude about climate change being settled science that fauci used for all the mitigation measures the government forced on the public. It's "settled science " and you peasants don't have the right to complain or have an opinion.
It actually is settled science. And the science behind it is simple enough for anyone to understand. In the 80's it was called the greenhouse effect and that was a good description of what it actually is. Everyone, I think everyone, knows how a greenhouse works. It absorbs the sun's heat, then traps the heat and holds it in. Too much CO2 in the atmosphere works the same way, trapping heat and moisture. And that is not junk science. There is also nothing unbiblical about global warming. Just read the book of Revelation. It is, if course contradicted by Republican politics, which gets millions in campaign donations, (bribes) from the oil and gas companies.
That is a good opinion.
The young woman is obviously passionate about the subject of climate change. But for me, her rapid-fire delivery of all of her thoughts borders on hysteria, which in turn undercuts her credibility. A panicked presentation doesn't elicit confidence in what you're saying.
Colin sounds like He is really smart....not sure what He would be like at parties.