Our Norwegian boy is a veteran in the NHL and should know better than to this stupid rookie mistake when down by one. Wild missed a power play because of that and lost the game...
There should have been two Flyer penalties and one Minnesota penalty! The original call was tripping on Hatheway! The Flyer announcers are claiming it was a dive but Hatheway's right skate obviously trips up Zuccarello, not the stick in the mid section, then the cross check by Laughton and the slash by Zuccarello, which the refs called both for "roughing"🤦♂! The refs didn't even assess the tripping minor to Hatheway which started the entire situation! You could see the refs arm up calling the trip long before the crosscheck and slash! What absolute Bullshit but typical NHL officiating! my opinion 🦂
Good eye. Clear skate contact there. Not a dive. Bad commenting there. Don't know Zuc's reputation, but that might have been a reputation call. Personally, I would have given Zuc 4 for roughing, Laughton 2 for roughing and Hatheway 2 for hooking (or tripping, take your pick). I think Zuccarello definitely did enough to warrant an extra, but Laughton did enough to be in the box as well.
Even if he didn't dive, he is KNOWN as a player that does that, so they called him for diving! It doesn't matter: the flyers won, and you have wild fans moaning about penalties!
@@daisymz3710I'm neither a Wild fan, nor a Flyer fan- disagree, Zucarello's not KNOWN for diving, and that wasn't a dive, but Hathaway's KNOWN for being a punk, hence he got penalized.
Hathaway never gets away from the penalty boxes, not the wonder that passed the 100 PIM last season 😂😂
Farabee and Faber look like they are going steady now....
Our Norwegian boy is a veteran in the NHL and should know better than to this stupid rookie mistake when down by one. Wild missed a power play because of that and lost the game...
Zuc has always been a diver. Oshie has fought him a couple of times for diving.
Penalty.... should have been matching minors.
His skate got caught up, typical flyer commentator, rubbish
Lmao no he didn't. He literally took a dive lmao
@@Conrailfan2323 because his skate was clipped by Laughton.
There should have been two Flyer penalties and one Minnesota penalty! The original call was tripping on Hatheway! The Flyer announcers are claiming it was a dive but Hatheway's right skate obviously trips up Zuccarello, not the stick in the mid section, then the cross check by Laughton and the slash by Zuccarello, which the refs called both for "roughing"🤦♂! The refs didn't even assess the tripping minor to Hatheway which started the entire situation! You could see the refs arm up calling the trip long before the crosscheck and slash!
What absolute Bullshit but typical NHL officiating!
my opinion 🦂
Good eye. Clear skate contact there. Not a dive. Bad commenting there.
Don't know Zuc's reputation, but that might have been a reputation call.
Personally, I would have given Zuc 4 for roughing, Laughton 2 for roughing and Hatheway 2 for hooking (or tripping, take your pick). I think Zuccarello definitely did enough to warrant an extra, but Laughton did enough to be in the box as well.
I didn't catch that skate.. great catch!
@@Leafsdude Zuu is not known at all for being a diver after almost 900 NHL games
Olympic diver at it again
Kurt Angle
@@SSNESS man won a gold medal with a broken neck
Thats a holding penalty all day long.. Hataways stick is around his belly and hits his glovs.. IF you call that a no penalty you are just dumb
@@Rammstein66-u9v how does that make his legs go above his hips lol Embellishment at its finest
@@codyhertzler2387 Clear penalty thats all i will say
Typical flyer homer announcers.
Even if he didn't dive, he is KNOWN as a player that does that, so they called him for diving! It doesn't matter: the flyers won, and you have wild fans moaning about penalties!
@@daisymz3710I'm neither a Wild fan, nor a Flyer fan- disagree, Zucarello's not KNOWN for diving, and that wasn't a dive, but Hathaway's KNOWN for being a punk, hence he got penalized.
Yeahhhhhh