'The Constitution Would Not Abide': Dan Bishop Questions Witness On 'Selective Prosecution'

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 янв 2025

Комментарии • 10

  • @NHLblkgurl
    @NHLblkgurl 18 дней назад +21

    Like democrat “selective” pardons and Clemency.. “selective” personal debt forgiveness, “selective” hiring practices, etc etc ?

    • @brb__bathroom
      @brb__bathroom 18 дней назад

      don't forget republican "selective" pardons and clemencies

    • @NHLblkgurl
      @NHLblkgurl 18 дней назад +6

      @brb__bathroom(thanks for admitting to my other examples, first.. LOL )
      But which “republicans” (which I’m not) commuted SOME sentences(not others), citing reasoning being against the DP? LOL (hard to clean up after Biden isn’t it? Aren’t you exhausted)

    • @Bearfacts01
      @Bearfacts01 18 дней назад

      Selective rights!

  • @JenellRubio
    @JenellRubio 18 дней назад

    I think ive heared it ALL now. The Consitution would NOT ABIDE...

  • @bradharris1062
    @bradharris1062 18 дней назад +2

    Selective everything apparently. Who is choosing!? The people in the positions of power. Good title. Like who picks yo choose jay walking not sodomy not but child moledtstion. Im not saying its mot correct. But with such wide variety in choice irs a revipe fir diaster

    • @ShaggyRogers1
      @ShaggyRogers1 17 дней назад

      That was always the problem with allowing "discretion". Discretion means that objective law enforcement is literally impossible. Justice is not blind if one cop will arrest for something that another cop wouldn't even ticket the person for. If there are too many laws to effectively enforce the most critical ones without using "discretion" to give leeway on the less important stuff in the name of priorities, then there are too many laws to start with.