So many of my Pashtun relatives who have done their ancestry dna has south, south east Caucasus, and have dna relatives like myself have a strong marker and 3rd ,4rth cousins in UK and ireland. Though I know no relations in these places. Also in north Italy and Germany for me. I think we are somehow related especially to Celtic.
Farming didn’t come into India from Anatolia or the caucuses; it was started independently within India. The 2019 Reich study about the Harappan DNA supports this fact.
if you follow dna migration from ice ages, you can see the clear direction the languages follow
So many of my Pashtun relatives who have done their ancestry dna has south, south east Caucasus, and have dna relatives like myself have a strong marker and 3rd ,4rth cousins in UK and ireland. Though I know no relations in these places. Also in north Italy and Germany for me.
I think we are somehow related especially to Celtic.
Farming didn’t come into India from Anatolia or the caucuses; it was started independently within India. The 2019 Reich study about the Harappan DNA supports this fact.
Reich says that because it supports his theory. Harappan civilization sees influx of new skeletons and crops around 5000 bce in mehrgarh.
It's called the "Ganga" river, not "Ganges".