If JJ doesn’t have time to hear the plaintiff’s evidence, then she should have skipped this case. He was trying to explain the procedure and how things work but she didn’t even give him a chance.
Yeah you tell her😂.. She game them a chance, he couldn't prove it. He just has a foreign accent and an innocent looking face that makes people like you indulge in your "Innocent immigrant getting shafted" fetish 😂😂
You should watch the entire case before posting your criticism. Notbthat it would make a difference if you can't understand what does and doesn't constitute admissable evidence.
@@brt5273 I know i should but the fact that its in 4 parts i like loooking at comments before going to next vid so thats what i like doing! I am sure other people are like me too! :)
To everyone who’s complaining about JJ: the reason she says that the evidence can’t be proven is because the plaintiff do not have forensic evidence. They only have the step-by-step process, which should be taken. But that does not preclude anyone, hacking, stealing, lying, to get information.
Exactly. They literally had no proof. No emails. No signatures. No text messages. No video. JJ can't simply rule based on, "Well, I assume what they're telling me is correct." Anyone who watches this show regularly knows that JJ doesn't play that game.
Judge Judy says it herself all the time, she's a reader's digest show. If they wanted to spend 6 months in a real civil court or mediation, they should have done so.
That was infuriating. They don't have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Just show its more likely than not. Its the way she was so arrogant about it too, tellin them theres no way they can prove it and laughing in their faces. How about this: DC is the only people with the address list. DC confirms only 2 people requested the list: the plaintiffs and the defendants. The defendants requested the list on Jan 1st. The flyers were sent out Jan 20th. The flyers all came from the zip code from the post office in one of the defendants neighborhood. Boom...more likely than not it was the defendants that sent the flyers out. That could have happened...we'll never know cause JJ kept cutting them off and wouldn't let them explain. They seemed like very intelligent people who had their paperwork in order, I would have liked to hear them out.
I usually don't skip Judge Judy cases, but I'm not finishing this one. The defendants are laughing like they're guilty as sin, and JJ is getting under my skin.
@@MelePaasi Spoiler alert, the defendants didn't get away with it. I also found this case hard to watch for the first parts, but in the end it was one of the more interesting cases. You can only see so many dog, rent and fender bender cases before it starts to feel repetitive and predictable.
That’s a lie. Usually your appearance on court shows is after your small claims court date. I was on judge Mathis my court date was prior to my flight there. They pulled my case and once it was pulled I was flown to Chicago. I lost and I know I would have won in small claims because I sued for a similar incident (non payment of daycare fees) and won a year later. Only go on these shows for the trip. Waste of time and only for entertainment.
They seem to be basing their case on "nobody had access to those names and addresses", then they conceded that the parent union had them. That's a big problem with the case. I'm unconvinced the names and addresses are secure. I mean, they need to send out correspondence and things like election dates to the members. That list could have been accessed by anybody, and all kinds of defamatory statements sent out, from how the candidates go to Thailand for access to children for sex, to spending union funds to organize a dog fighting operation. That doesn't mean the opposing candidates created the documents or sent them.
Judy is impatient. These later episodes really bother me. She never listens. But again, this is fake small claims court. No one pays anyone anything. The show pays for all fees. So this man is suing for 5000. Judy doesn't want to listen, because she's trying to save the show money.
There are too many people on both the plaintiff and defendant side for JJ to have patience in this case. By the time she banged her desk at 2:58 and told the plaintiff to pay attention she was already done. I also love how she smiled at the plaintiff as he was trying to explain. 🤣
It’s not what you know; it’s what you can prove. I believe the guy, but he has no solid proof. I can also tell that where he’s from and his authoritative voice and posture that he’s not used to being spoken to like, especially from a woman. He seems perplexed. 😂
You're getting too caught up in the details/context because you're interested. She's right, if you strip it down to right/wrong, facts, and evidence they cannot PROVE nobody else could have the mailing list. You could make a good case for it, but it needs to be PROVEN not likely.
JJ "Prove IT" Guy gives exact reason . . . JJ "But that's not proving it" . . . Me: JJ you just need a snickers sis cause he made valid points and the other side was visually shaken by his knowledge of the rules
But the defendants weren't proven to be the only ones with access to addresses. They may have access, but there's no proof they had exclusive access or sent them out.
I agree with Judge judy they had no proof. No emails, phone calls, transcripts, or fingerprints if you come to court, you bring actual proof, not a story you could come up with on the spot. Like someone sharing the names sure it could happen but had can you prove that person was the one who did? You know what I mean?
Just as easy as she wouldn’t accept the plaintiff evidence she shouldn’t have accepted the defendants evidence. Her excuse was, there’s no proof that they sent that out, so why would you accept theirs when you have no proof that they sent that out either.
They eventually learn to just be quiet, listen and answer her questions without any hesitation. 3 ways to win on Judge Judy, Answer her questions quickly and without a story, have insurance and have a leash on your dog
Chances are, one of the defendants sent out the flyers. The problem is the plaintiffs cannot PROVE it. Hearsay is not proof. Procedures and bylaws, in this situation, are not proof. Anyone could have access to those names and addresses. The janitor who cleans the office could have access to those names and addresses. You can't expect the judge to make a a leap for you in lieu of proof. That's not how the justice system works.
Folks mentioning JJ's handling of the plaintiff's "evidence" are perhaps not understanding how proof works. Neither policy nor regulations prove that something did or did not happen -- both of those are upheld by choice at one's own risk. JJ is saying "Prove it" beyons whay he is saying because he is stating is what is *supposed* to be the case, not what provably happened.
This case is way too complicated for a half hour episode on Judge Judy. You need a multi day trial before an arbitrator knowledgeable in Union issues. Judge Judy is at her best with simple cases like landlord / tenant disputes, car accidents or personal loans. She is in way over her head here
I've worked in a union which is basically what this "federation" is. The union is so clever about their tactics, and of course they have no problem getting current and former members to stand with them in trial. I'm sure they tried for more and the show said 4 is enough. It's clear they got elected through gross tactics. So thankful I started my own business and 7 years later I never have to work with a union again.
One encouraging word from someone can destroy months of negative self-talk. One word from God can destroy decades of suffering. Encourage someone today, it can make a difference. Share God’s word today, it can save a life. -Rev. Victor M. Jackson
Judge Judy sounded foolish and very partial here. That's why I always say the judicial system is not about justice, but about whose speech was more clever on the day. Sometimes the one in the right just happens to be more clever. Sickening
I’m sure JJ knows there’s a possibility they’re guilty. Unfortunately he cannot guarantee the addresses are secure, or that the defendants are the ones who distributed the addresses. She is bound by proof. No proof. No case. JJ is bound by the law. The law requires proof. The plaintiffs do not have proof
I don’t agree with JJ on this case.. I hate when she tell someone that they can’t prove something that they can in her courtroom.. I would love to go on her show if I ever sued someone bc I would definitely tell her when she is wrong no matter if I had to loose the case or not.. bc she is flat out wrong for how she handled them people.. was mean from the start..
I love you Judge Judy, but boy, sometimes you need to climb down off that high horse of yours and treat people with some respect. This is a fine example.
😮 the courtroom is crowded!!
I love when it's crowded lol Judge judy can yell more 😅
LOL EVERYONE IS APART OF THE UNION AUDIENCE TOO
Gotta love JJ!❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉
They have no life or job but to sit for hours watching cases in person.
@@r.r911 I heard the audience is law school students 🤔
If JJ doesn’t have time to hear the plaintiff’s evidence, then she should have skipped this case. He was trying to explain the procedure and how things work but she didn’t even give him a chance.
Yeah you tell her😂.. She game them a chance, he couldn't prove it.
He just has a foreign accent and an innocent looking face that makes people like you indulge in your "Innocent immigrant getting shafted" fetish 😂😂
because its hearesay and how can you prove it. Just cause he explains how it works don't mean thats proof.
You should watch the entire case before posting your criticism. Notbthat it would make a difference if you can't understand what does and doesn't constitute admissable evidence.
@@brt5273 I know i should but the fact that its in 4 parts i like loooking at comments before going to next vid so thats what i like doing!
I am sure other people are like me too! :)
Because she’s racist
JJ is WRONG about dismissing the idea that only the members have access to the addresses. the plaintiff is crystal clear about that: infuriating
Agree, she does that a lot I notice
She is a show for entertainment. This case is more serious and should be taken to a real courtroom. That’s probably why she responded the way she has.
If I wanted actual justice I would NEVER go on Judge Judy.
No shit sherlock 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@tsimmons007 that is not what they were saying
Ever
You realize JJ knows what she’s doing. If she wanted to do a criminal case, SHE COULD
Then why are you on her website
To everyone who’s complaining about JJ: the reason she says that the evidence can’t be proven is because the plaintiff do not have forensic evidence. They only have the step-by-step process, which should be taken. But that does not preclude anyone, hacking, stealing, lying, to get information.
Exactly. They literally had no proof. No emails. No signatures. No text messages. No video. JJ can't simply rule based on, "Well, I assume what they're telling me is correct." Anyone who watches this show regularly knows that JJ doesn't play that game.
Agree anyone who desperately wants to take the plaintiffs side without doing homework are kiss ash.
I like Judy, but she is full of bull on this case. The evidence is more than likely that someone on that committee was guilty.
@Wjohnson8437,, I agree
Judge Judy says it herself all the time, she's a reader's digest show. If they wanted to spend 6 months in a real civil court or mediation, they should have done so.
Based on what?
@@feisty4ny982 exactly! assumptions and "guts feelings" don't prove anything
That was infuriating. They don't have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Just show its more likely than not. Its the way she was so arrogant about it too, tellin them theres no way they can prove it and laughing in their faces. How about this: DC is the only people with the address list. DC confirms only 2 people requested the list: the plaintiffs and the defendants. The defendants requested the list on Jan 1st. The flyers were sent out Jan 20th. The flyers all came from the zip code from the post office in one of the defendants neighborhood. Boom...more likely than not it was the defendants that sent the flyers out. That could have happened...we'll never know cause JJ kept cutting them off and wouldn't let them explain. They seemed like very intelligent people who had their paperwork in order, I would have liked to hear them out.
They sent that slanderous shhh to the other members. I wholeheartedly believe the plaintiffs!
I usually don't skip Judge Judy cases, but I'm not finishing this one. The defendants are laughing like they're guilty as sin, and JJ is getting under my skin.
Agreed. It’s obvious they got away with it. And judge Judy doesn’t usually like dealing with people and thick accents so she will rule unfairly sadly.
@@MelePaasi Spoiler alert, the defendants didn't get away with it. I also found this case hard to watch for the first parts, but in the end it was one of the more interesting cases. You can only see so many dog, rent and fender bender cases before it starts to feel repetitive and predictable.
You should watch the rest
You and me both
Same!! She’s usually on point but she’s unfair in this case.
I think the plaintiffs are telling the truth. Just no proof
Yep...in this segment at least.
yes they are!
It’ll take 6 months in another court… It will take 6 minutes with Judge Judy
🤣🤣
Litigation vs. arbitration 101
That’s a lie. Usually your appearance on court shows is after your small claims court date. I was on judge Mathis my court date was prior to my flight there. They pulled my case and once it was pulled I was flown to Chicago. I lost and I know I would have won in small claims because I sued for a similar incident (non payment of daycare fees) and won a year later. Only go on these shows for the trip. Waste of time and only for entertainment.
@@kristinahighlander2529It’s not that serious, it was just a joke 😅😂
I saw four parts!! Great start to a 3 day weekend 🎉
I have a 3 day weekend too? 😄 👍🏾
Three-day weekend here in Canada! (I’m in Vancouver)
I think sometimes JJ already knows who is going to lose and gets impatient. She was particularly grumpy this day. 😅
Probably getting close to lunch
pretty sure it's Sushi day! You know how she gets when it's sushi day. lmao
She gets to read their statements before starting, so has an idea what's what. ....
“Just do it fast”- 😂😂💀 JJ was ready for lunch 👩🏻⚖️
love the plaintiffs necklace.
Judge Judy pisses me off when she refuses to listen to people. "You can't prove that to me." SHUT UP and listen, and maybe they can.
As a lawyer she knows what can be proven AND HOW IT MUST BE PROVEN. 1000X more than you ever could.
@@stratfordbaby ah yes. Judges are clearly psychic, knowing exactly what someone’s gonna say before they say it. 🙄🙄
They seem to be basing their case on "nobody had access to those names and addresses", then they conceded that the parent union had them. That's a big problem with the case. I'm unconvinced the names and addresses are secure. I mean, they need to send out correspondence and things like election dates to the members. That list could have been accessed by anybody, and all kinds of defamatory statements sent out, from how the candidates go to Thailand for access to children for sex, to spending union funds to organize a dog fighting operation. That doesn't mean the opposing candidates created the documents or sent them.
All government offices have to make any/all information accessible to the public, even salaries.
I actually gave up 2 minutes into this case. I don't usually give up on them like that.
😂 It was good. Shocking ruling.
1:45 and I'm done... absolute sh.t
Plaintiff: I will do it.
Judge Judy: Then, do it fast! 😂
Addresses are public record.
She’s not giving the plaintiffs a chance! Whats up with her
Judy is impatient. These later episodes really bother me. She never listens. But again, this is fake small claims court. No one pays anyone anything. The show pays for all fees. So this man is suing for 5000. Judy doesn't want to listen, because she's trying to save the show money.
I AGREE SHE COMING OFF A LIL HANGRY TOWARDS THEM
She knows the Ps can’t prove their case.
@@triffus seen all JJ episodes it’s not about how much he is suing. She’s just acting off for no reason
@@triffus but her show now. JJ upped her amount from $5k to $10k.
There are too many people on both the plaintiff and defendant side for JJ to have patience in this case. By the time she banged her desk at 2:58 and told the plaintiff to pay attention she was already done.
I also love how she smiled at the plaintiff as he was trying to explain. 🤣
"Sue has the addresses and gave them to him"
Then why did you not bring sue as a witness?
Right 😩
It’s not what you know; it’s what you can prove. I believe the guy, but he has no solid proof. I can also tell that where he’s from and his authoritative voice and posture that he’s not used to being spoken to like, especially from a woman. He seems perplexed. 😂
Love me an African Accent 😅
Sounds more like carribean accent
@@harryrob8221 yes very similar. I am from the Caribbean and there would be a little extra flavor 😅🥰
He has Africa on his necklace
Tcheumani is a Cameroonian surname. Sorry I lived in Africa and needed to know
@@loralubimaia2783 Cameroon!!
His accent is definitely Cameroonian
and irritating
Do all accents irradiate you?
I was hoping someone would name the region. I love different accents..... yes, I'm weird.... 😎
I think you meant “irritate”. 😂
Sometimes Judy do not give people a chance.
She already knows they can’t prove their case
@@PartyOf8PleaseBecause she is holding them to a standard of proof only used in criminal cases
You're getting too caught up in the details/context because you're interested. She's right, if you strip it down to right/wrong, facts, and evidence they cannot PROVE nobody else could have the mailing list. You could make a good case for it, but it needs to be PROVEN not likely.
She did, the plaintiffs didn't get it, is not her fault they are dumb
it only has to be 'more likely than not' - it is not a matter of proof beyond a reasonable doubt@@CatfishBradley
So many people 😂
JJ "Prove IT" Guy gives exact reason . . . JJ "But that's not proving it" . . . Me: JJ you just need a snickers sis cause he made valid points and the other side was visually shaken by his knowledge of the rules
Maybe you should watch the entire case
@@brt5273 I'm making it through the case like everyone else and commenting as I go
But the defendants weren't proven to be the only ones with access to addresses. They may have access, but there's no proof they had exclusive access or sent them out.
I agree with Judge judy they had no proof. No emails, phone calls, transcripts, or fingerprints if you come to court, you bring actual proof, not a story you could come up with on the spot. Like someone sharing the names sure it could happen but had can you prove that person was the one who did? You know what I mean?
Why did I read ‘were’ as ‘were’ as in werewolf and I thought “oooo what’s a werenurse?!” 😂 it’s late 😴
I’m so excited 🎉
She upsets me when she doesn’t really listen or understand. It’s not far off to believe what they’re saying
JJ doesn't rule based on beliefs. She rules based on evidence.
Wait. ARE the addresses secure?
I mean...😬
I like the male plaintiff’s drive 🧠
But it's causing him a problem in this very moment.
@@truelife974 well, he ended up winning the case. 😇
Thank god for law. Thank god lol
Judge Judy read statements before trial
Just as easy as she wouldn’t accept the plaintiff evidence she shouldn’t have accepted the defendants evidence. Her excuse was, there’s no proof that they sent that out, so why would you accept theirs when you have no proof that they sent that out either.
Sounds like poor losers!
She's not even listening to him they know they sent it
The problem here is the plaintiff is trying to force an issue out of turn. She didn't ask him to provide her with anything, she asked the defendants.
They eventually learn to just be quiet, listen and answer her questions without any hesitation.
3 ways to win on Judge Judy, Answer her questions quickly and without a story, have insurance and have a leash on your dog
Defendant sure was swallowing hard and blinking rapidly!
They could have sent them themselves
What is this case about?
Politics 🤮
Defamation and slander
this is the wrong court for this
lol they say the union is for the govt 😂
Chances are, one of the defendants sent out the flyers. The problem is the plaintiffs cannot PROVE it. Hearsay is not proof. Procedures and bylaws, in this situation, are not proof. Anyone could have access to those names and addresses. The janitor who cleans the office could have access to those names and addresses. You can't expect the judge to make a a leap for you in lieu of proof. That's not how the justice system works.
Folks mentioning JJ's handling of the plaintiff's "evidence" are perhaps not understanding how proof works. Neither policy nor regulations prove that something did or did not happen -- both of those are upheld by choice at one's own risk. JJ is saying "Prove it" beyons whay he is saying because he is stating is what is *supposed* to be the case, not what provably happened.
This case is way too complicated for a half hour episode on Judge Judy. You need a multi day trial before an arbitrator knowledgeable in Union issues. Judge Judy is at her best with simple cases like landlord / tenant disputes, car accidents or personal loans. She is in way over her head here
I've worked in a union which is basically what this "federation" is. The union is so clever about their tactics, and of course they have no problem getting current and former members to stand with them in trial. I'm sure they tried for more and the show said 4 is enough. It's clear they got elected through gross tactics. So thankful I started my own business and 7 years later I never have to work with a union again.
I believe the male plaintiff. Let’s see how this all turns out though…
I can’t Get Jiggy with this Flyer!!
“Just do it fast”
“Sorry”
😂😂😂😂😂
One encouraging word from someone can destroy months of negative self-talk. One word from God can destroy decades of suffering. Encourage someone today, it can make a difference. Share God’s word today, it can save a life.
-Rev. Victor M. Jackson
This one’s gonna be juicy…
Time for a long break!
@@PartyOf8Please How long do new episodes take to upload?
@@danielcruz-bk6ylusually around 30 minutes.
@@Crazycatlady71 Not bad!
Judge Judy, will someone tell this little woman that there is no such word as COMPUDER nor DAUGHDER ? what happened to the letter 't' ?
I have a feeling plaintiffs will lose.
3:38 😂😂😂😂
sore lossers now they sue
I don't care if its 8 hundred or 8 million 😅
Ah the cranky JJ is on today 😅... snd I'm still here for it
Should've went to judge Mathis
Cameroon
At first I thought Judge Judy was being kinda unfair to the plaintiffs but they won in the end lol so I guess not~ It was the whole five grand too~
Jj is wrong on this, shes bullying down the complainant
No audio???
Awww shuudddup u haters! Judge Judy is awesome!
Judge Judy sounded foolish and very partial here.
That's why I always say the judicial system is not about justice, but about whose speech was more clever on the day. Sometimes the one in the right just happens to be more clever.
Sickening
I’m pro union, but against government unions
Anybody else notices how Judy pronounces the letter P? Pfrp 👅
JJ sometimes is unfair
It’s the smirks between them that says it all. JJ is wrong
I’m sure JJ knows there’s a possibility they’re guilty. Unfortunately he cannot guarantee the addresses are secure, or that the defendants are the ones who distributed the addresses. She is bound by proof. No proof. No case.
JJ is bound by the law. The law requires proof. The plaintiffs do not have proof
Bleached blond sounds like a liar.
Could judge Judy be anti union?
She be getting on my nerves sometimes! I think she’s getting old bc she be wrong a lot of times
This is olddd 😢
sorry JJ but I disagree with you on this one so far :(
Judy needs to shut up and listen df
Judge Judy I already have her mind made up they're not going. To win this is why I stopped watching her show she is so not fair. 😔😏
All is fairl in love war and politics 😅😅😊
So they say. 😂
@@Crazycatlady71 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆
Part 2?
Nigerian guy lol lost election cause he was stealing funds and now he’s suing for 5 k lol
I dont trust the plaintiff's........
We know why
Bruh judy old head don’t even want to listen to this case thinking she know everything
Seriously ,they would have that little fool for their leader ????
I don’t agree with JJ on this case.. I hate when she tell someone that they can’t prove something that they can in her courtroom.. I would love to go on her show if I ever sued someone bc I would definitely tell her when she is wrong no matter if I had to loose the case or not.. bc she is flat out wrong for how she handled them people.. was mean from the start..
I love you Judge Judy, but boy, sometimes you need to climb down off that high horse of yours and treat people with some respect. This is a fine example.
Government employees should not have unions.
Honestly I like Judy but she doesn’t take time to listen to people for fucking shit, she needs to work on that.
Here JJ is clearly prejudiced from minute 1 against plaintive! Perhaps strong accent of former prrd8dentvof this organization?
Plantiffs r full of it.🤨
IMHO the defendants are guilty.
JJ in over her head. Real people suffer.
Government employees should never be allowed to unionize. Full stop.
My favorite topic too, LABOR unions. Gross!
government employees, free jobs for the barely competent
Do they have to learn how to speak English before they stay ? Nope
I guarantee you won't get the responses you're hoping for... guarantee it!!!!
The white ppl that colonized the country didn’t 😴🥱
Judy made up her mind wayyyy too early again