The Few Companies That Own the Rest: Watch Industry Breakdown | Everything You Need to Know

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 июл 2024
  • Shop Watches: teddybaldassarre.com/
    Written Content: www.teddybaldassarre.com/blog
    Follow our Instagram: / teddybaldassarre
    Follow our review show: / @teddybaldassarrereviews
    Teddy Baldassarre is a worldwide content outlet & authorized retailer helping millions of watch enthusiasts learn about and purchase their next watch.
    On this channel, we explore all aspects of the industry and hobby of watches including reviews of watches, interviews with prominent individuals in the watch industry, tours of factories, and more.
    We do not accept any advertising proposals from watch brands which allows us to openly create content without outside editorial insight, and we only accept authorized dealership partnerships with brands which reach Teddy’s stringent criteria including brand heritage, value for money, marketing & manufacturing integrity, and more.
    Our goal is to inspire a generation of watch enthusiasts and supporting our store supports our efforts to expand our content and reach. If you are considering purchasing a watch that we are an authorized retailer for, we appreciate the opportunity to earn your business.
    Top Articles On TeddyBaldassarre.com:
    50 Luxury Watch Brands You Should Know: teddybaldassarre.com/blogs/wa...
    10 Affordable Watch Brands And Their Best Watches: teddybaldassarre.com/blogs/wa...
    Best Watches Under $5,000 Complete Guide: teddybaldassarre.com/blogs/wa...
  • ХоббиХобби

Комментарии • 1 тыс.

  • @SeaNaCl
    @SeaNaCl 5 лет назад +148

    Oris is my favorite brand currently and its miraculous that they are still privately owned. Surprised there wasnt any mention of them.

    • @francisrobindaine-duchesne6095
      @francisrobindaine-duchesne6095 3 года назад +9

      Thinking of buying an Oris watch this year. I think that what will destroy the watch industry in the long run is when watch companies get to be owned by investment firms that think only about money and don't consider history, heritage and innovation if it's not for an immediate profit.

    • @Amatugold
      @Amatugold 2 года назад +12

      Late reply, but it's interesting to note, that at one point Oris was owned by the group which would become known as the Swatch Group, and ended up producing watches with quartz movements, however they managed to be bought out by a couple of gentlemen who decided to take the company back to its mechanical roots.

    • @mcmlxv9827
      @mcmlxv9827 2 года назад +1

      I will be buying at least 1 Oris this year. Nice watches and I like the thought of supporting a private company.

  • @JR-gp2zk
    @JR-gp2zk 5 лет назад +813

    In Russia, Vostok owns you..

    • @reezevlog
      @reezevlog 5 лет назад +21

      now thats is a comment of the century!!

    • @01sevensix
      @01sevensix 5 лет назад +1

      Hai faive

    • @h4k4r0
      @h4k4r0 5 лет назад +40

      I am Russian and my Vostok wears me.

    • @AverageThinking
      @AverageThinking 5 лет назад +8

      I came here to ask about Vostok. Are they good quality?

    • @nikital7541
      @nikital7541 5 лет назад +17

      Great joke Comrade. Ok fun now over. Off to gulag with you.

  • @terrenceyork
    @terrenceyork 5 лет назад +148

    Oris is independent. And also one of my favorite companies

    • @bobelaviador
      @bobelaviador 3 года назад +1

      still using ETA movement shared by more tha 20 brands (swatch Group)

  • @Paniniyotnibenj
    @Paniniyotnibenj 5 лет назад +269

    Japanese watches are, for me, the best watches for the regular working class people like me. Quality is top notch but with in the budget.

    • @edude_127
      @edude_127 5 лет назад +20

      Japanese watches are great. Practicality and engineering prowess is clearly there. Only thibg that you lose out on (in exception of Seiko) is the finishing and polish quality. But hey, I gan live w/that if it saves me thousands of dollars 😂

    • @bletwort2920
      @bletwort2920 5 лет назад +2

      I agree. To me an exceptional watch at a low price point is more impressive than the most impressive and expensive watch.

    • @simpson-qk6yd
      @simpson-qk6yd 5 лет назад +3

      haha you gues are funny, japanese watches are of course good, but just good and nothing more, own a rolex and then you will know that what your mentioning is bullshit

    • @PCMKR-xe2vx
      @PCMKR-xe2vx 5 лет назад +10

      All just people perceptions and an individual preference, but to my own experiences Japanese (group) made are the best in reality( build quality and affordability) despite of the hype of Rolex, etc.

    • @Hi_how_you_doing
      @Hi_how_you_doing 5 лет назад +2

      My skx007 and srpa21 are my daily work watches and I work with my hands.

  • @heathwasson7811
    @heathwasson7811 5 лет назад +175

    Oris is a very notable watch company that is still privately owned.
    And while many watch lovers look down their nose at Raymond Weil, it's family owned and still run by a grandson of Raymond Weil. Personally I think the snubbing of RW is unwarranted. While taste in style vary, the watches are very well made with high level fit and finish certainly on par with Omega, Breitling, etc... The Freelancer chronographs are hands down one of the best bang-for-the-buck watches on the market today.
    Ball Watches are another great buy, if you're looking to really maximize how much you're getting for your money.

    • @MrGoldmember2
      @MrGoldmember2 5 лет назад +6

      I've always admired Raymond Weil watches. I don't understand the hate they receive. To your point the Freelancer is an amazing piece; I will add the black dial, brown strap chrono to my collection one day.

    • @jerseyneil1
      @jerseyneil1 5 лет назад +8

      Talking about great Swiss watches for the price, Tissot and Zodiac are wonderful pieces. My daily wearer is a Zodiac Astrographic and I always get compliments on it.

    • @LouisWinthorpe622
      @LouisWinthorpe622 5 лет назад +5

      I bought a Longines Hydroconquest which is nice (and super accurate) but I wish I had known about Ball. Even their cheapest, the Fireman Enterprise, is my favourite 'I want one' watch. The second hand even bears my initials. You are so right about Ball, you must be right about Raymond Weil as well.

    • @tijnblub6221
      @tijnblub6221 5 лет назад

      Isn't oris owned by the swatch group in the '70?

    • @joka7316
      @joka7316 5 лет назад +1

      Yes, for a short time.

  • @JamesK1963
    @JamesK1963 5 лет назад +364

    Unfortunately, the reality is that most of these iconic brands could not exist on their own. They wouldn't have sufficient working capital and cash flow. So from that perspective, it's nice how these large groups are able to preserve such iconic brands and provide consumers with such a diversified product set.

    • @kronossonork6994
      @kronossonork6994 5 лет назад +14

      Jim K They would survive if people were more educated about the brands heritage and history. Personally I like Tudor, Vostok and Citizen.

    • @JamesK1963
      @JamesK1963 5 лет назад +96

      Relying on people being more educated is not a tenable or sustainable business model.

    • @peglor
      @peglor 5 лет назад +27

      Just because people know about the brand doesn't mean they'll buy more. I'm a fan of mechanical watches from an engineering point of view, but the reality is the technology peaked in the 1700-1800s because it was needed to solve the longitude problem and everything since in mechanical watches (Except the Seiko Spring Drive, which is partially electronic) has just been making shiny expensive jewellery that's mediocre at best at timekeeping. Unless you can teach people about the brand without allowing them to learn why the technology is so obsolete you're unlikely to grow sales that way. That's why the advertising is in the line of 'rich people wear this product - make people think you're rich by giving us all your money'.
      This means that while I appreciate the effort that goes into making these, which is why I won't say they're overpriced as jewellery, but I'd feel like an idiot paying thousands of dollars for a device that's shit at doing the one thing watches are supposed to be designed to do, namely keep accurate time without constant recalibration/servicing.
      The main usefulness of high end watches at this point is that it's a lot easier to smuggle a $50 000 watch between countries on your wrist than it is to try moving that much cash without being caught. The very high end watches (The ones well into the 6 and 7 figure territory) are bought as investments rather than to wear, because they're easy to store in a safe, need negligible upkeep while stopped, and can usually be sold at considerable profit if they're rare enough to begin with and are exempt from capital gains taxes in many countries (Similar to exotic sports cars), so this is nothing to do with people who like watches, it's just another investment option.

    • @peglor
      @peglor 5 лет назад +4

      Depends on the grade of stainless steel and the type of chocolate :-D... The raw material cost isn't where the value is built into the watch though, it's the many processing steps, specialised machinery and skilled workers needed to make it into something, so the price is at least justified by the labour and expertise required to make the product in the case of watches, even if they don't do the job of keeping time very competently.
      In contrast, sunglasses (Another heavily marketing driven product) are a different story. There is less than €5 of plastic in most of them and they are injection moulded, by mostly unskilled workers running machines that run automatically, so the material cost is the vast majority of the manufacturing cost of these products. Moulds can be very expensive to get good optical surfaces, but the number of parts a mould will make before it degrades is very high, especially for non-glass fibre reinforced plastics as used in most sunglasses. Unlike the watch industry, one company does own almost all the brands of sunglasses on the market, as well as several of the chains that sell them - look up Luxxotica.

    • @phatcowboy76
      @phatcowboy76 5 лет назад

      Ikr?

  • @markgrieves1307
    @markgrieves1307 3 года назад +1

    Hi Teddy. Once again your content is an education. I was pleased that Rotary got a mention, a great British favourite, which was producing watches for the RAF in WWII, a brand which you will know was started in Switzerland by Mois Dreyfus. The Hong Kong owners still use British Design and some models are still made in Switzerland. My mother thought that they were "posh" so that's probably why I have four of them. She also taught me the difference between inexpensive and cheap. They are inexpensive but if you wanna push the boat out a little, they are affordable. There, I've just told you where I fit into the hierarchy of collectors. Great video as always. 👍

  • @comyf5986
    @comyf5986 5 лет назад +512

    Hey....where is Casio?

    • @pacman1789
      @pacman1789 5 лет назад +134

      Comy F Casio is an independently owned and operated company under the Casio Computer Corporation.

    • @dw7284
      @dw7284 5 лет назад +9

      Comy F I was thinking the same lol

    • @pacman1789
      @pacman1789 5 лет назад +19

      dw 72 Then maybe you should read my comment too and you will wonder no longer.

    • @dw7284
      @dw7284 5 лет назад +13

      Draven Alexander how about you read mine...? The original question was where is Casio, as in why didn't he mention it, not who owns it.

    • @pacman1789
      @pacman1789 5 лет назад +42

      dw 72 That's actually why he didn't mention it. The whole video is about watch companies owned by bigger corporations. Since Casio is independently owned and don't own any smaller watch companies, they aren't on the list.

  • @rever-mi6qz
    @rever-mi6qz 4 года назад +24

    Don't forget Oris and Fortis, both still independent!

  • @michaelhulbert7360
    @michaelhulbert7360 5 лет назад +21

    Really appreciate the effort and research you put into your videos Teddy.
    I think the conglomerates are an economic necessity in these times. I also think it’s ok as long as the various companies can retain some independence and not get too homogenized. Midi, Tissot and Hamilton all have their own designs and personality, but benefit from the ETA research and manufacturing expertise.

  • @jaredcampbell
    @jaredcampbell 5 лет назад +5

    Fantastic video! Great to see all of the different brands and who owns what. It also really helps a person appreciate brands like Nomos, Fortis, and Oris being independently owned. Thanks again for the video.

  • @BKyne
    @BKyne 5 лет назад +1

    It would be interesting to see what models in the big watch houses float their luxury models. Awesome vid as usual and please keep feeding us the large variety content. You are covering things other channels aren’t coving. Thanks.

  • @zsombor1986
    @zsombor1986 5 лет назад +10

    Teddy, your channel is slowly becoming my favourite among the all of the ones on youtube. Great content, very-very mildly snob and speaks to all generations. Keep it up.

  • @jeffm0518
    @jeffm0518 5 лет назад +8

    What amazes me is how each brand has their own nitch in the market place. Each brand has their own following and are known for something specific. I think it would be very unrealistic to think many of these brands who sell lower priced watches, not necessarily lower value watches, but more affordable watches could survive and have the impact they do without the protective covering of their parent companies. Watches are like any consumer product on the market today. If you start drinking wine you will start with something that is affordable and to your liking i.e. a Robert Mondavi White Zinfandel. Most people will "mature" into more complex wines. Same with watches. Start them with a Timex they like and allow them to mature into nicer watches. The industry needs the "introduction watches". They have their place. That is one reason I never put down the fashion watchers. They are introducing an entire generation to watches. A generation who uses their cell phones for time keeping. Some people are content with driving a Mitsubishi Mirage while others want and are willing to spend the money on a Corvette. It's all good. As long as people are buying watches it's good for all of us.

  • @smbren
    @smbren 5 лет назад

    Nice overview Teddy. Being familiar with Richemont and LVMH groups, and a bit of Swatch, the groups mostly allow the brands to maintain their own culture, their own design, their own marketing approach, etc. It's not quite all the big conglomerate take over as I saw in another comment. Many of these companies have only been able to survive some of the financial downturns due to the financial backing of a holding company. During 07-08, one group did quite well due to cash on the balance sheet while most others were having some very difficult times. In these larger groups, each brand works almost like a department and has it's own budget and then manages things related to the brand as I already mentioned. And in today's age that we live in, these groups are able to start to reap some cost savings that single brands can't as they have shared resources for things such as human resources, finance, IT staff, Ecommerce platforms, basic IT infrastructure, repair centers, call centers and the list goes on and on. The group is there to ensure the foundation is there for the brand to succeed at what they do, which is simply marketing and sales, and also service but that is not the primary focus.
    With all the savings the groups and brands have seen, did we see price cuts? hahahaha
    But what the groups are able to do because of multiple brands working in multiple countries and regions, if one brand is hurting and not making the sales numbers, hopefully enough of the other brands are over the numbers to compensate for this. Same from a country and regional perspective. Hence why much of the public reporting is not by brand or region so as not to highlight any particular brand/region as an issue when the overall company numbers are meeting expectations.

  • @julianmuller9567
    @julianmuller9567 5 лет назад +55

    Wasn't aware of the different companies owning these brands, a great educational video on the industry!

    • @TeddyBaldassarre
      @TeddyBaldassarre  5 лет назад +5

      Hey Doc! Glad you enjoyed this one brother!

    • @julianmuller9567
      @julianmuller9567 5 лет назад +1

      Always, always

    • @antibling
      @antibling 5 лет назад +2

      I was aware of some of this plus movements etc but I didn't realise the rabbit hole went this deep! :P

    • @realtalk6195
      @realtalk6195 3 года назад +1

      @@TeddyBaldassarre Consider doing a video on _privately-owned_ quality European watch brands. And another on non-European quality watch brands that were founded _prior_ to the Quartz Crisis.

    • @Meltedbutta7
      @Meltedbutta7 3 года назад +1

      This isn't new man. It happened after the quartz crisis. A handful of extremely rich men own the watch world, and also other incredibly priceless things.

  • @treedillinger5801
    @treedillinger5801 5 лет назад +164

    Good for the industry? It’s kind of a necessary evil. As enthusiasts we’d prefer all of the companies to be independent and return to their former glory... but the reality is that these brands were bankrupt. The conglomerates bailed them out and snatched them from the jaws of death.
    Let’s look at Omega, for example. Swatch Group’s cash cow. I could use a more vulgar analogy but we’ll keep it clean. Plenty of cons in the way Swatch runs it...but the pro: Omega still exists. It’s that simple. They wouldn’t exist otherwise. They would’ve gone bankrupt by the year 2000. As much as the brand has been bastardized- the Omega factory in Geneva still exists, it’s not exactly like Swatch is stamping Omega on machine made watches from Hong Kong.

    • @christopherhermawan9627
      @christopherhermawan9627 5 лет назад +13

      cash cow is not a badterm, actually, it is a marketing term.Well I agreed to your proposition that thanks to the conglomerate buying the brands, they are still exist today. Not only that, they also try to be 'true' to the brand and look inspiration from their history.

    • @treedillinger5801
      @treedillinger5801 5 лет назад +7

      Christopher Hermawan yeah, I didn’t mean that cash cow was a bad term...I didn’t want to say that they’re pimping the brands. But now I’ve done it 🤦🏻‍♂️ lol. But yeah, I think they generally do a decent job, all things considered. Also, each brand still has its own factory and a lot of independence from the parent company- at least in terms of watchmaking, but not so much in terms of production numbers, marketing etc.

    • @donmateo25
      @donmateo25 5 лет назад +5

      For that reason, along with quality, I love Raymond Weil. I have a beautiful Tango that is 20 years old and works flawlessly. Still family owned and beautiful, quality watches.

    • @syndicatedsatellite7288
      @syndicatedsatellite7288 5 лет назад

      @@treedillinger5801 cash bull..

    • @robertn3121
      @robertn3121 4 года назад +5

      Well, Omega has turned into a cash cow. A company that makes watches (actually the movements) that are that good needn’t be releasing a dozen so called “limited edition watches” every year. It clearly hurts the reputation and marketability of an otherwise fine watch. Swatch really doesn’t care. You can bust on Rolex’s “production/availability” issues all you want, but it remains the most profitable watch company in the world. They produce far fewer watches than Omega, but make far more money. There is a reason for that...

  • @drwindsurf
    @drwindsurf 5 лет назад +13

    Great video Teddy. I don't think this hurts the industry - it actually seems to have saved many watch companies during the quartz crisis. I think with the advent of kickstarter and similar platforms there are micro-brands popping up and introducing new ideas and energy into the market (not to mention storied brands that continue to innovate).

  • @mglures
    @mglures 3 года назад +1

    Nice summary Teddy thanks. In addition to those pointed out below I think you also left off Hamilton. When I’m looking at brands I like to note where they’re doing the manufacturing and assembly so that might be something to add if and when you update this one.

  • @jasonspringer2983
    @jasonspringer2983 4 года назад +11

    This isn't a watch company thing. This is a company thing. A few companies own all the other companies which basically own the world

    • @klam77
      @klam77 4 года назад +1

      Yeah, like assa abloy in locks. There's ONE lock company.....

    • @realtalk6195
      @realtalk6195 3 года назад

      The eye glass industry is even worse. One company owns the entire market, Luxottica, which is why glasses cost insanely so much in the West. In the developing world, the glasses are usually replicas and knocked-off designs at a fraction of the price.

  • @eynkeehoohoohaechad4997
    @eynkeehoohoohaechad4997 5 лет назад +3

    This was really interesting! Thank you for posting it.

  • @clo2715
    @clo2715 5 лет назад +24

    Love your videos. Always learn a lot from them.

  • @zennor_man
    @zennor_man 5 лет назад

    Thanks for the breakdown. Really useful if new to high end watches. However I think you have left out some prominent brands as have been mentioned in previous comments.

  • @Wetheuntitled
    @Wetheuntitled 2 года назад

    3:31 that’s my first watch with a blue face and a Leather strap. Absolutely love it. Still young and working my way up can’t wait to add more to my collection

  • @AJMacDonaldJr
    @AJMacDonaldJr 5 лет назад +5

    I'm wondering why it's so hard to find Seiko watches in a store. I see mostly Citizen watches where I live. Lots and lots of Citizen watches. And none of them automatics.

  • @adceal
    @adceal 5 лет назад +8

    Great video and very good summary of the watch industry but you forgot Casio! 😀 I think this consolidation of companies happens in every industry item. It's both positive and negative in my humble opinion

  • @peterosullivan8200
    @peterosullivan8200 5 лет назад

    thanks for the video, interesting for me, just bought a Baume et Mercier clifton. Think the company umbrella helps them to keep prices as they want.... On the other hand definitely helps with keeping the automatic watch at a quality

  • @chris555
    @chris555 Год назад

    Thanks. Really helpful for a noob to the watch industry but striving to gather a small collection

  • @theparkerstudio
    @theparkerstudio 5 лет назад +11

    Excellent presentation. Fortunately for us as consumers, there is a healthy level of competition in the watch industry -- there is no dominant monopoly that can single-handedly determine prices. As a result, whether you buy a Timex or Casio -- or pay 100x more for an IWC or Rolex -- you're still getting a quality watch from a heritage brand. I can't think of another industry that offers such a wide range of great choices for the consumer.

  • @renepoche4171
    @renepoche4171 5 лет назад +3

    Love the video. Like others here, I've wondered about the "inner workings" no pun intended, of the watch world. Great job!

  • @JULLIETROMEO
    @JULLIETROMEO 2 года назад +1

    This is very educational and you are so knowledgeable and this short video is well delivered! Kudos to You, Sir!

  • @thomashudson7780
    @thomashudson7780 5 лет назад

    thanks for the education update,great to see how the industry has evolved and the changes that have been made,,

  • @markjohnson7318
    @markjohnson7318 4 года назад +3

    Casio?I own a Seiko for my dress watch, but I use a pair of G shocks (all solar) at work.-Oklahoma School Teacher

  • @stephenjcarr1
    @stephenjcarr1 5 лет назад +6

    Orient is part of Seiko Epsom - Epsom is even engraved on the caseback of my Ray 2.

  • @ericchilver9113
    @ericchilver9113 9 месяцев назад +1

    1:18 LVMH group
    2:00 Richemont Group
    2:47 Swatch Group
    3:44 Seiko Group
    4:32 Kering Group
    4:53 Citizen Group
    5:14 City Champ Group
    5:31 Fossil Group
    5:57 Movado Group

  • @philliphull50
    @philliphull50 5 лет назад +1

    Thanks teddy that was amazing another classic video did not know a lot of that information really good stuff keep it coming!

  • @cesarsaucedo5110
    @cesarsaucedo5110 5 лет назад +4

    Very interesting. Good job!!

  • @JJexciter
    @JJexciter 5 лет назад +7

    Damn, man. Haha!
    It’s like you read my mind. I’ve been wondering about this exact thing!
    Thanks for another great video 👍

    • @TeddyBaldassarre
      @TeddyBaldassarre  5 лет назад +3

      Happy to help man!! This was an interesting but time intensive one to put together

    • @JJexciter
      @JJexciter 5 лет назад

      Well, it’s greatly appreciated. I look forward to every one of your videos because I learn so much. It’s become a part of my weekly rituals!
      Btw, the production of your show is outstanding. Always clear, crisp, warm lighting and perfect sound and music.
      You do this by yourself or with a team? Either way, great GREAT work.

  • @ruby055
    @ruby055 5 лет назад

    Another awesome vid. Best I have seen on this subject! Nice job!

  • @rubenelands812
    @rubenelands812 5 лет назад

    Hi, I am a watch fan and doing a market research for a school product aboud the watches market! Do you have any tips and recommendations? Do you know where to find a marketing report about the watch market? Tnx

  • @AmitSharma-cg7qr
    @AmitSharma-cg7qr 4 года назад +25

    It's same with Luxury Sun Shade brands every Sun Shade or Specs you know is owned by Luxxotica be it Ray Ban, Gucci, Prada everything literally everything.

    • @mariumrajah
      @mariumrajah 4 года назад +1

      DITA
      Eye frames
      I'm pretty sure this is independent company...

    • @user-dz9yi5iy3y
      @user-dz9yi5iy3y 4 года назад

      American Optical is still independent.

    • @paulnewman4274
      @paulnewman4274 3 года назад

      Don't forget oakley

  • @Jp_1998_
    @Jp_1998_ 5 лет назад +6

    I only knew about the Swatch group and Seiko :O
    I gotta step up my game man

    • @TeddyBaldassarre
      @TeddyBaldassarre  5 лет назад +3

      Well I hope this video will get you on your way!

    • @ReformMsia
      @ReformMsia 5 лет назад +1

      Teddy Baldassarre
      Can you give us an idea on in house Movements company like patek, AP on their revenue 2017

  • @alexgratzaTV
    @alexgratzaTV 5 лет назад

    Ayo, i love this chanel, the videos are great and literally every video has a very interessting topic and perfect lengh

  • @shimranbutt6709
    @shimranbutt6709 5 лет назад

    Love to learn form your efforts. Thank you and please don’t stop!

  • @topg2820
    @topg2820 5 лет назад +16

    Great video, Teddy! It's actually good to have these big companies, without them we would not have any mechanical watch companies alive after the quartz crisis, also now the smartwatch crisis has arrived thanks to a non-watch company Apple

    • @TeddyBaldassarre
      @TeddyBaldassarre  5 лет назад +3

      Thank you man! I think you do bring up a good point. Collecting resources under 1 larger umbrella can certainly be helpful!

    • @chadwaters261
      @chadwaters261 5 лет назад +1

      I think your comment is spot on and an excellent analysis of the history and current market of watch brands.

  • @MightyMouseESP
    @MightyMouseESP 5 лет назад +172

    6:01 Tommy HilfiNger ......????? 😂😂😂. 😇😇😇

    • @ibo_
      @ibo_ 5 лет назад +15

      Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    • @ajax5197
      @ajax5197 5 лет назад +4

      @@ibo_ I'm a simple guy,I see someone overdoing something and I like

    • @michaelsam4239
      @michaelsam4239 5 лет назад

      overused emoji fucker 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @michaelsam4239
      @michaelsam4239 5 лет назад

      HHHHHAAAAAAA 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @bletwort2920
      @bletwort2920 5 лет назад +2

      Tom me he’ll finger

  • @RiffDevin
    @RiffDevin 5 лет назад

    Interesting video thanks. Where does Ball Watch Co fit in all this?

  • @Greg-tj8rg
    @Greg-tj8rg 5 лет назад +2

    I think as long as the big companies like seiko and swatch continue to make their movements available at relatively affordable prices in bulk sales then there will always be microbrands that will provide quality and affordable pieces. That will force at least some of the lesser known brands within these groups to keep their prices in check.

  • @davidcoleman2463
    @davidcoleman2463 4 года назад +4

    I love my Hamilton swiss automatic but I think I will stick to my 2 Seiko watches. One day I will get a Grand Seiko . What a beautiful watch . The Japanese are the best.

    • @DeadEyeRabbit
      @DeadEyeRabbit 4 года назад

      David Coleman what makes them better than Swiss? I’m just now learning.

  • @SiuLeung
    @SiuLeung 5 лет назад +3

    this is interesting, what about Sea-gull? I heard they are one of the biggest movement makers in China. Maybe they aren't big enough for this list?

    • @vilarusfpedro96
      @vilarusfpedro96 3 года назад

      Huuuuu..... Hurt mutch? 😜
      Now for serious, yes you are correct. BUT like many chinese things there's just not information about it..... Wonder why...

  • @AdeelAliShah1980
    @AdeelAliShah1980 5 лет назад

    Very informative video, thanks mate.
    Can you or anyone else tell me the product number or name of the Omega at 8:34 please, what nice piece.

  • @blainecole5452
    @blainecole5452 5 лет назад

    Also worth noting; Citizen Group now owns La Joux-Perret SA. It uses these Swiss movements in their Campanola line.

  • @hayesjk11
    @hayesjk11 5 лет назад +16

    i didn't know citizen was its own company!
    i always thought seiko epson owned citizen! learned something new today!

    • @cristianmicu
      @cristianmicu 5 лет назад

      citizen and seiko are 2 monsters for a long time.
      i would be shocked to hear one got the other
      i would put my money on seiko all day, tho

    • @jperryhal
      @jperryhal 3 года назад

      they also make Miyota movements which are used in many brands.

  • @shipmate3577
    @shipmate3577 5 лет назад +9

    Dude, you forgot Sinn, Damasko, Fortis, and Oris.

    • @CoberBox1
      @CoberBox1 4 года назад

      All great brands. Saw previous comments regarding Fortis and Oris being independent. Will have to check if Sinn and Damasko are as well.

  • @muhammadabdullahi8602
    @muhammadabdullahi8602 2 года назад

    Really Informative for watch collectors.
    Pls do the 2021 version

  • @melusinecentun5847
    @melusinecentun5847 5 лет назад

    Very informative video, thank you! Take care, Irène.

  • @abdullah79195
    @abdullah79195 5 лет назад +6

    Content is always top notch. Love it

    • @TeddyBaldassarre
      @TeddyBaldassarre  5 лет назад

      Thanks brother! I really enjoyed putting this one together

  • @ouzaloid
    @ouzaloid 4 года назад +3

    Morellato group: sector, maserati, ferrari, etc
    ...

  • @sunnyr8434
    @sunnyr8434 5 лет назад

    Thanks for this information.
    An idea for the next video.. Top 10 brands in terms sales in USD.

  • @chillnvibeshorts1559
    @chillnvibeshorts1559 4 года назад

    Love you videos. What do you think of Raymond Weil watches?

  • @garrettjanssen7683
    @garrettjanssen7683 5 лет назад +12

    I think it speaks volumes that an effective marketing department (Rolex) can maintain sales dominance. I do think that these holding companies provide upsides but individual watch brands inside get diluted. Longines used to be a top brand, producing their own calibers and competing with Rolex for Chronometer certifications. Now apart of the Swatch group, they operate with standard, effective ETA movements. So now many brands focus on design and heritage as opposed to their movements. And design is only half the equation for a watch. As someone who adores manual wound movements, this is sad state of affairs.

    • @AndreiAndrei-pg8eg
      @AndreiAndrei-pg8eg 5 лет назад

      Omega do their own movements , even if they are part or swatch, in fact they are the only company in the industry that has adopted the revolutionary coaxial escapment.
      Piaget also does all in house movements, check them out.
      JLC too goes full inhouse

    • @elzafir
      @elzafir 5 лет назад +4

      Since both Longines and ETA are owned by the Swatch Group, isn't it technically in-house lol? I kid, I kid. It's a marketing decision by Swatch Group to saturate all market segments. They needed a recognizable brand to fit the entry-level luxury segment. And Longines was the one chosen to "step-down". Now they have a brand for every segment. Mass Market/Basic Range (Swatch/Flik Flak). Entry-Level/Middle Range (Tissot, Hamilton, Mido, Certina, Balmain, Calvin Klein). Entry-level Luxury/High Range (Longines, Rado, Union Glashuette). Luxury/Prestige Range (Blancpain, Breguet, Harry Winston, Glashuette Original, Leon Hatot, Jaquet Droz, Omega).

    • @rustyshackleford17
      @rustyshackleford17 5 лет назад

      Rolex does have a phenomenal marketing department.
      But that is what I find justifying the ever increasing prices of high end brands...that just re-case ETA movements.

    • @assoverteakettle
      @assoverteakettle 5 лет назад +1

      I don't think marketing alone explains Rolex's enduring presence in the luxury timepiece market. A market which can be described as mature or even in the declining phase of product life.
      Other companies like Breitling, Longines, and Omega also place high glossy ads in magazines, or sponsor high profile sporting events, but cannot come close to the presence of Rolex.
      Rolex has the advantage of being iconic and having high brand (top of mind) awareness even among people who know nothing about luxury wrist watches.
      Most horologists know that there are many other watch brands that have a higher level of workmanship than a comparable Rolex but none of them can touch Rolex's iconic status because it has a mystique and established image that no amount of glossy print ads, or promotions can buy.

  • @keivefy
    @keivefy 5 лет назад +5

    Perhaps a necessary evil. Quartz devastated the industry in the 80s and bankrupted many of the companies. Today we have the emergence of smart watches disrupting the industry again just 30yrs later. Or worse still many in the younger generation, millenials as they're called don't wear watches at all, they use their phones. I work in finance and during boring meetings I used to enjoy spotting the good watches worn by bankers and such types. Lately I've noticed the quality of watches worn have really fallen down the scales. Thats the impact of 10yrs+ recession in banking I guess.

    • @NomadicPhoton
      @NomadicPhoton 3 года назад

      I'm 18, and have recently gotten into mechanical watch collecting and appreciaton. I find it's still more convenient to simply look at your wristwatch, not to mention more elegant, than looking for your phone. Maybe I'm just old fashioned. :)

  • @AvgJoeWatchReviews
    @AvgJoeWatchReviews 5 лет назад

    Awesome video! I learned a lot. I was wondering why Breitling wasn't listed under Swatch until the end of the video explained. Well done sir.

  • @masqueman01
    @masqueman01 5 лет назад

    This was enlightening! What a hairball to sort out, but you made it easy to follow!

  • @jaromor8808
    @jaromor8808 5 лет назад +5

    5:36 the letters falling appart on the Kors dial

    • @mdleweight
      @mdleweight 4 года назад

      Missing some attention to detail and just plain ugly too.

  • @ronch550
    @ronch550 4 года назад +6

    Rolex is the No. 1 selling watch brand in the world? I'd think Seiko sells more watches.

    • @cosmalas7742
      @cosmalas7742 4 года назад +1

      Casio sells more surely

    • @ronch550
      @ronch550 4 года назад

      @@cosmalas7742 oh yeah I guess Casio probably sells more watches than Seiko.

    • @pentachronic
      @pentachronic 4 года назад

      As far as movements I'm sure Seiko sells the most.

    • @ronch550
      @ronch550 4 года назад +1

      @@pentachronic I heard somewhere that Seagull (China) sells about 25% of the world's mechanical movements. Not sure that's true. It's kinda hard to verify these numbers in the watchmaking world. But yeah, between Seagull and Seiko I'd go Seiko.

    • @jakekaywell5972
      @jakekaywell5972 3 года назад

      @@ronch550 Among Swiss makers, Rolex actually is the No.1 selling brand.

  • @viel.anthony
    @viel.anthony 4 года назад

    Hi Teddy, what's the Longines at 3:38? Can't find it on their website. Thanks!

  • @asktonyc
    @asktonyc 5 лет назад +2

    Thank you, Teddy. I learned a few things watching this video!

  • @eyeheartsushi2212
    @eyeheartsushi2212 5 лет назад +61

    So Bowel Movement got acquired, I see 😉

  • @JamieChorley
    @JamieChorley 5 лет назад +6

    To be honest, it stands to reason that this would be the case. As things are today, how many factories do people really believe there are that supply the materials that these watches use? The point of any business is create as a big a return as possible for its shareholders, and consumers would do well to remember that. The notion "History and heritage" is marketing, plain and simple, and incredibly effective in the watch industry. Because watches (like many material things) have become a symbol of a persons status, consumers of these products become self-policing brand ambassadors, and in turn it allows these brands to steadily hike the prices. The people at the top of those groups could care less about heritage (other than ensuring it matters to consumers). Their goal is to have buyers part with their money.
    All that said, I genuinely do love watches, but that's just the truth of it. People save for years to line shareholders pockets, and in exchange they receive a stainless steel watch and a big ol' dollop of heritage

    • @fidoliedo
      @fidoliedo 5 лет назад

      I agree. I feel after this video, I don't have that sense of pride of ownership in my collection. I feel like a moron for owning a Patek, or Cartier. The value is what these companies make it. Gone are the days when you longed to get that Longines, or that Rolex. Now it's just high price crap. Like owning a Mercedes that's really a Honda Civic under the skin. Quality is not there anymore in anything. Now that a cheaper known company owns the rights to say, Cartier for example, what's to stop them from putting a cheap quartz movement in their case and charging a crazy price because it says Cartier on it? Where's the value? So now only vintage watches are worth something?

  • @brentcoons2011
    @brentcoons2011 4 года назад

    very well done and informative....kudos

  • @menaseven9093
    @menaseven9093 5 лет назад +1

    Great video and important information. Five corporations own the majority of the watch industry. Unifying many watch companies under one corporation will allow all those watch companies to survive in time of economic recession or technological innovation like what quartz watches did to the Swiss industry in the 1970s.

  • @SirLoinOfsteak85
    @SirLoinOfsteak85 5 лет назад +6

    Well the automotive industry is similar really...e.g. Fiat who own Chrysler, Dodge, Ferrari, Maserati, Alfa Romeo.
    Is it a bad thing? I think not. The companies are able to leverage talented minds across a couple of continents and the consolidation means a more reliable product overall through the standardisation.
    I think there are parallels with the watch world there. I can't count the number of times I've heard "Well don't worry about servicing, it's an ETA 2824 so any competent watch maker should be able to do it."
    While in-house movements may make you feel warm and fuzzy, it's like with a car engine; you've got to think of the cost of upkeep. So provided they have individual styles and teams working on new ideas, I'm ok with the main components being something easy to maintain and standardised.

    • @rp7841
      @rp7841 5 лет назад

      SirLoinOfsteak85 Ferrari split from fiat on January 2016. The newly independent company held an initial public offering (IPO) shortly after.

    • @SirLoinOfsteak85
      @SirLoinOfsteak85 5 лет назад +1

      Ryan Powell I know. FCA still owns 90% and it was done for tax purposes, so it's still safe to say they own them.

    • @peglor
      @peglor 5 лет назад

      Compared to, say, the sunglasses industry, watches and cars have plenty of diversity anyway.

  • @syndicatedsatellite7288
    @syndicatedsatellite7288 5 лет назад +10

    The name on the dial doesn't matter... It is more about how the watch looks, performs, lasts, comfort level and punch per buck... After all that, the name on the dial matters to most people.

    • @syndicatedsatellite7288
      @syndicatedsatellite7288 5 лет назад

      @Sk8LovesSweet Of course...

    • @syndicatedsatellite7288
      @syndicatedsatellite7288 5 лет назад

      @Sk8LovesSweet So am I.

    • @elzafir
      @elzafir 5 лет назад

      @@syndicatedsatellite7288 That is a lie. Of course the name on the dial matter. On every level of purchase, in every market, not just watches. Because the 'name' indicates a certain level of quality (performance, lasts) and heritage associated with it. And you even said how the watch "looks". The brand (or "name") is a part of that.

    • @syndicatedsatellite7288
      @syndicatedsatellite7288 5 лет назад

      @@elzafir When a company starts to make a substandard product to what they previously made, the name doesn't matter much... Look what happened to Cadillac for example. The name brand doesn't hold as much clout.

    • @richardseekins24
      @richardseekins24 5 лет назад

      @Sk8LovesSweet I agree but it does matter to the re-sale value

  • @jovanni_orb5116
    @jovanni_orb5116 2 года назад

    Oh nice a list of what stock to check out. Thank you

  • @4427126
    @4427126 5 лет назад

    Good and amazing work!!!!
    Only a question. SEIKO Co., sell to a lot of marks, partial or entire movements.
    Vostok use in one of its models, a SEIKO MOV.
    And all around the world sell it's NH movementes.
    Sorry, another question. MASSERATI. Use a SEIKO mov. , then ,is a second Brand or not?
    pst...pst… don't tell anybody, but….OMEGA, buy parts to SEIKO....

  • @mediastarguest
    @mediastarguest 5 лет назад +5

    Does not matter who owns what. What matters more and what was NOT stated in this video is that ALL and EVERY moving and non-moving part from your Swiss match was MADE in China. Be it a 500-hundred dollar job or a five- thousand - made in China, assembled in Switzerland. One of the greatest mysteries of mankind is why people don't like to speak about, state, publicize or hear the truth.

    • @mrjakobt
      @mrjakobt 5 лет назад

      mediastarguest That is 100% bs. There are still quite a few parts made in Switzerland or Germany. Ofc that‘s only the case for higher end watches.

    • @mediastarguest
      @mediastarguest 5 лет назад +1

      @@mrjakobt If, as you say, there are still quite a few parts made in Germany and Switzerland, then it's not 100% bs - it's 50%.

    • @rustyshackleford17
      @rustyshackleford17 5 лет назад

      Unfortunately, the standard for being "Swiss made" is astonishingly lower than "US made." I seriously doubt that the percentage you rattled off was actually that low.

    • @melvinch
      @melvinch 5 лет назад

      If a watch was assembled in Switzerland by a China worker, is it still considered Swiss made ?

  • @swabby429
    @swabby429 5 лет назад +5

    The watch market is saturated. I'm anticipating some sort of crash within the next few years.

  • @dominikg.5231
    @dominikg.5231 5 лет назад +1

    when such concentrations are formed, the smart top management of the companies is key to the success of a brand. As a customer I prefer the way of Richemont over Swatch, as Richemont focus more on the heritages of the brands. As an economist you have to honor Swatch for achieving cost savings through synergy captures. thank you teddy for this great summary!

  • @lorenzorolando553
    @lorenzorolando553 5 лет назад +1

    Hi Teddy, can you please make a video about Citizen, like the brand but don't know much about it.

  • @abdullahabdulaziz
    @abdullahabdulaziz 5 лет назад +6

    How can you forget Casio come on
    Its also one of the largest brand

  • @sauliniinisto5779
    @sauliniinisto5779 4 года назад +6

    *Fondation Hans Wilsdorf owns Rolex and Tudor*

  • @leo9272
    @leo9272 5 лет назад

    Thank you for this video!
    I'm struggling between the FAC00005W0 and the FAC08002F0....
    What do you think? Any advice? Which do you prefer?

  • @chirstianrcj
    @chirstianrcj 5 лет назад

    Question
    Do I need to taxes when buying a watch from Europe/Asia to the States? Thanks 🙏

  • @kronossonork6994
    @kronossonork6994 5 лет назад +4

    Vostok - in house, accurate and bullet proof and still retains the soul of an original Omega Speedmaster with the same Heselite lens....

  •  5 лет назад +15

    Timex is not independent. They are owned by Fred Olsen Group a shipping company from Norway.

    • @antibling
      @antibling 5 лет назад

      No way! I like little titbits of info like this. Timex Classic 100, best watch out there imo. :)

    • @TeddyBaldassarre
      @TeddyBaldassarre  5 лет назад +3

      Rene Bjørnskov not independent but are still privately owned unlike the other groups on the list.

  • @attosharc
    @attosharc 4 года назад +1

    I like the video, and please continue making them. I wish you had covered all of the watch groups in the world as there are only about twenty. If I'm wrong... make another video. Very interesting and anything that may encourage people to buy a watch can't be bad.

  • @Sool101
    @Sool101 5 лет назад

    Kind of revealing, holdings/companies that have, to me personally, likeable and the other, unlikeable or desirable brands under one roof. Very good, thanks for sharing!

  • @muffemod
    @muffemod 4 года назад +8

    Heineken owns many of the beers people drink.

  • @harkonen1000000
    @harkonen1000000 5 лет назад +12

    I think you missed Casio.

  • @flippinzippo9670
    @flippinzippo9670 5 лет назад +2

    Very informative vid! Well put together, and I learned a lot! I think im a swatch guy after all..

  • @mattwagg9485
    @mattwagg9485 5 лет назад +1

    If it's part of a big group then they can reuse the technology across multiple different brands and save money whilst providing consumers with a diverse range of watches.
    Am considering my first IWC watch, do they hold their value?

  • @wesdaniel
    @wesdaniel 5 лет назад +12

    I’m enough of a watch geek that I made a flow chart showing ownership groups LOL
    The constriction of the industry is one of the reasons that I’m still such a Rolex fan - they run their own show and are still (comparably) Affordable.

    • @TeddyBaldassarre
      @TeddyBaldassarre  5 лет назад

      Hahaha making flowcharts industry definitely certifies you as a watch geek my friend 😂

    • @KurzawaJakub
      @KurzawaJakub 5 лет назад +4

      Well, not much people know this but Rolex watches are reasonably priced for what they are. Have history, are well built and you won’t lose your money when buying popular models new or pre-owned. There is even a possibility that their market value will rise.

    • @AR-rk9nn
      @AR-rk9nn 5 лет назад +5

      Definently not affordable at all. Look at Oris for an affordable independant watches

    • @KurzawaJakub
      @KurzawaJakub 5 лет назад

      V P Have you Heard of a watchmaker Roger W. Smith?

    • @wesdaniel
      @wesdaniel 5 лет назад +3

      V P Well, that was incredibly insightful and helpful. How about a video of your collection that are all superior to Rolex? 🙄

  • @Dewottm8
    @Dewottm8 5 лет назад +10

    6:01 “tommy hilfinger”

    • @jperryhal
      @jperryhal 3 года назад

      it's Tommy Hillbilly, get it right! ;-)

  • @rabihjawhar451
    @rabihjawhar451 5 лет назад

    Very informative, thanks for sharing man :)

  • @stevensudragor
    @stevensudragor 5 лет назад

    Interesting vid topic 👍tho would be nice if you put a flowchart or overall list for those of us who are just really skimming the vid. Lol

  • @ArnoldJulianS
    @ArnoldJulianS 5 лет назад +14

    How about Oris?

    • @TeddyBaldassarre
      @TeddyBaldassarre  5 лет назад +12

      Oris is independently owned!

    • @Sool101
      @Sool101 5 лет назад +11

      Orisn't. (sorry, couldn't help it)

    • @marceltaus8010
      @marceltaus8010 5 лет назад +1

      Oris is by the swatch group

    • @trondkanstadkvalvik2932
      @trondkanstadkvalvik2932 5 лет назад +1

      @@marceltaus8010 I believe you are mistaken. Oris became part of Swatch during the 70's but left Swatch to be privately owned again in 1982, and has been in private hands since.

    • @richardseekins24
      @richardseekins24 5 лет назад +4

      I have huge respect for Oris. "real watches for real people"

  • @sorinbunea471
    @sorinbunea471 5 лет назад +5

    Casio own all these 😂

  • @danav3387
    @danav3387 5 лет назад

    When you enter a named store you can see what other brands they are selling. We have a couple specific named stores here on is Fossil and like you said they sell these other brands there as well..

  • @Keens9
    @Keens9 5 лет назад

    What brand and model is the watch from the thumbnail?