The one thing that never set right with me was they didn’t search their own house. If your child is not in the house where she is suppose to be wouldn’t you turn your house upside down looking for her.
@@lindamon5101 Yes......they wanted to send the police on an out of home search so they could have time to move the body.....on a boat or private plane.....or whatever. The whole reason for the "ransome" was to divert the search
@@JB-js4xi wrong. The intruder was caught 2m down the road months after jbr murder. This lil girls mom caught him so he fled. Lookup 14yr old assaulted after jbr
What I NEVER understood about this case (I lived in Denver at the time and the Ramsey family members were well known in the "social circuit" in Boulder) was WHY IN THE HELL were her parents not immediately separated and QUESTIONED separately to compare their stories. This should have been done immediately. The Boulder police totally screwed this case up from day one. They were known at the time as being very corrupt. Boulder was called "Disneyland" because of all the crimes that went unprosecuted. It was such a tragic case and we will NEVER know what actually happened. No justice for that poor baby girl.
I remember so vividly at that time thinking that there was just no way that a stranger wrote that ransom letter. It was SO LONG and sounded like a random note from a movie. It actually is worded like something from a movie. The family, the mom and dad knew exactly what happenned to her.
The intruder(s) were likely in the house for hours waiting, therefore he or they had a lot of time on their hands so it's not surprising the letter was long. We are talking about very sick individual here, so common sense can't always be applied in any analysis. It's someone that knew them and the young msn who killed himself shortly after is your killer.
@@deidrecoday1269 The guy who killed himself even had a similar flashlight with the one left on the kitchen counter, the Ramsay's didnt, plus his family has refused to allow LE to get a sample for his DNA.
One thing that stood out for me was when the 911 operator told the police that Patsy was hysterical on her initial call but when she hung up the phone she did it improperly and the operator could hear their conversation. They were talking very calmly and it seems like her hysterics were a ruse to mislead the police. Patsy wrote the note, faked the call and almost certainly knows what actually happened.
We have the recorded call. You can listen to it. Some people belive they can hear voices afterwards, but I certainly can only hear static noise that could be anything...
Yes! She was hysterical but it stopped when she thought she hung up the phone! Even if we’ll never know what was said in the background, but it sounds like normal conversation, not panicked or hysterical like Patsy JUST was.
@@maxwellsdemon10Yes but if Patsy was really upset you would hear her wailing taper off into the distance. Or hear her yell to John somewhere since you don’t hear him upset near by on the phone. Not instantly stop. Keep in mind, her only daughter has been “kidnapped”. I would think in that situation the man would call because he has a better chance of being more level headed and less hysterical. The father would be better at relaying important information, even when upset. That’s just a moment where a husband and father would take charge
@@Biggerbetterboulder1 I think extrapolating from the behaviour of people in extreme situations is almost always bad. People act weird in stressful situations and some innocent people just act like the most guilty motherfuckers around.
What stood out to me in the ransom note was when the author wrote, "Use that good Southern common sense of yours....." There's no way a foreign faction would've written that.
lol, and no one calls their group a "small foreign faction". Oh, we're just a small little group, and if you're reading this in America, we are foreigners. lol
I'm glad you brought up the point that the Ramsey's were not concerned when the ransom deadline passed without a call. This is one of my key points for the Ramsey's being involved. I cannot think of a logical reason you would not be freaked that the kidnappers did not call unless you knew there was no kidnapping.
& they left Burke upstairs all alone. Why didn't they get him up & ask him son are you ok ? Did you see or hear anything last night ? Why were they not afraid the intruders might still be hiding in the house ? I know I'd have my other child right downstairs with me.
They weren't worried when the deadline passed. They were also told to not contact anyone, police or anyone, but they called friends and family to show up. Even if you call the police, if you believe you're being watched, you don't call over the entire neighborhood.
@@terrikuykendall7580 They were waiting by the phone. John was instructed to ask to speak to JonBenet when the call came. Every time the phone rang Patsy collapsed as if someone punched her in the stomach.
I'm a police officer (and someone old enough to remember this case as a young adult - I was 20 when it happened) and I agree with the commenters that the Boulder Police screwed this up very badly. As soon as they got on scene, they should have gotten everyone out of the house, secured the perimeter, and obtained a search warrant. Period. This process should have been explained to the parents in a straight-forward and non-accusatory way, but none the less, it should have happened despite any objections on their part. It's absurd that the police allowed John Ramsey to re-enter the house unaccompanied. I even knew this at the time it happened as a 20 year old rather minimally trained security policeman in the Air Force. I was shocked that actual homicide detectives could make such terrible blunders.
Thanks for sharing your knowledge, officer! I've always thought that this cause would be solved a great group of people like you with previous knowledge and experience all from different points of view: A lawyer, a police officer, a former judge and a district attorney.
An FBI profiler doesn't believe the Ramseys are involved and a profile of a suspect stated that he or she might commit suicide and that is what happened. One suspect did kill himself. The FBI believes 3 people are involved in this tragedy.
I have 30 years in law enforcement and still find this case endlessly fascinating. The crime scene is so small and it got contaminated very quickly. The beginning of the story was a kidnapping which puts everyone in a different state of mind, which is "Find the trail as quickly as possible and get that child back". A kidnapping leads you away from the scene, a murder puts you at the scene. The ransom note itself is so bizarre. I don't think we will ever know the full story.
and when we find out the full story, it'll be even more unbelievable! someone could confess to killing this little girl and everyone would still think the parents did it! it's gonna be some weird nancy kerrigan/tonya harding, beauty pageant rival type thing that no one sees coming. or the maid trying to tell patsy about how she witnessed burke "innocently" molesting jonbenet and patsy really ripping her a new one! maid goes home and runs her mouth to enough friends (and her hubby) about what it's really like working for the ramsey's and it sets someone off (and the maid had a key to the house, right??). whatever the story, it will all end up making perfect, crazy, jaw-dropping sense in the end.
burke did it, he had motive, he was angry jealous for years, he struck JB on the head with the heavy flashlight, he didnt realize it wd fracture her skull, the parents covered it up bc they didnt want to lose the only child they had left. family friends confirmed they had seen violence from burke onto JB during dinners n bbqs etc. he even smeared feces on her bed and on her christmas candy. THATS ANGRY! and demented....
@@gnphillips5481 Nahhh,John all the way from family... 1)He is the one contaminated the scene 2)The one that knew about that window,that window that was broken and once before he went inside cause he lost keys...any other family members no keys??plus that window leads to that place (basement,room)that jon benet was inside??? 3) That letter points John,FBI if I am correct said that based on that letter it was never about jon benet but about john that hohn made someone angry..john said that he can't think making anyone angry cause it is not on his character 🤷🤷🤷....Do you see the pattern now??
I didn't know the Ramseys had an open window(s) to allow for one or more extension cords for outside Christmas lights. I wonder where this information comes from.
It shoulda been the "smoking gun" error by the writer..wasn't no need for it..a pro sure wouldn't done it..she/he thought it would distance the whole family from having part in the death(accidental)
The father shouldn’t have been told to search the house. And everyone but the police and family should have been told to leave. The police should have been searching the house. Nuts.
The cops did a shitty job. JonBenet was killed by her father or one of the neighbors because she fought with them because they were going to rape her AGAIN!!!!
And of course, the note instructed the parents not to talk to anyone or Jonbenet would be killed. Then the parents called not only the police but everyone they knew, so they already knew she was dead.
IF they knew Jon Benet was already dead and in the house why leave a note period until they disposed of the body?Even a kidnapping would involve checking the whole house for clues
Dear Patty & john, I've kidnapped your precious daughter from her bedroom. She's in the cellar now dead. Xoxo, The Killer I mean COME ON. It's a red herring. And it did exactly what it was supposed to do. Cast doubt and cause chaos.
While pinpointing the exact murderer(s) and true motives is daunting, there is compelling evidence that the Ramseys were involved in the coverup. Any investigation into this murder needs to start with coverup and work its way toward the culprit.
I read that note three times. It's highly contrived and strident. Its tone matches the mother's bombastic conversational style in her interviews. The mother wrote the note.
Brian Ritchey It has never been proven the mother wrote the note and until it has been proven don't make assumptions about who did write it. And I have read that note 3 hundred and 33 times.
Interestingly enough, only a half dozen of the 46 alphabet characters in the 1400 character note approach Patsy's identifiers. Comes to mind "a" (Patsy has three of these which are context dependent, not positional), perhaps "w", I want to say "D" or "d" (I'm doing this from memory and it's been some months), possibly "S" and "s" (but not consistent). Rather than individual letters, a more telling sign are descenders. Patsy used two 'q's. One, as in 'quite', is formed by making a 'c' and then the reversed descent of a 'g', with complete overlap of the final descender (full loop). The second cinsists of making a descending 's', followed by closing the gap at the top to form the upper closed portion of the 'q'. These are unique enough to be indicators. Pay close attention to the "l"s (that's lower case"L") and "y"s. The first in the ransom note invariably has a crook in it, making the "l" look like a lightening ⚡ in the Ransom note. Patsy never makes "l"s like that. Doubt if she's capable. Another noticable difference is the "y" which invariably has a hook up to the right at the bottom of the descender in the ransom note. Patsy's never do this. Again, nothing like Patsy's. Probably 90% of the note characters don't come close to Patsy's. Cina said 200 similarities or something like that. Out of 1400 characters. However, she was not presented absolute exemplars and actually analyzed a couple hundred different documents from various sources to select a most likely exemplar or set of exemplars. They supposedly came from Patsy, but the samples that I saw definitely did not. Probably JB's 😂😂. Patsy definitely did not write the note. Police took a ton of VHS out of the houses and I'll bet not one of the movies quoted in the ransom note were in the bunch.
No, bizarre that any parents would not have ALREADY torn that house apart, BEFORE any cops got there. Again, the Ramseys not reacting like normal parents.
The first detective that showed, before finding the body, said in an interview that she had to call for more officers multiple times before anyone else would show up. I place blame for not finding the killer squarely on the Boulder Police Department.
@@vian-ij4sv I listened to that interview yesterday of that detective. Very bizarre that even after finding Jon Benet’s body it took way too long for more authorities to arrive. Very poor response and what else could be going on in Boulder then more important than a murder of a child. I lived in Boulder a short time in 1979. It’s a low crime town.
@@whitedragoness23 The crime scene was in the basement and nobody entered the basement until John found JonBenet there. Any contamination that was done was the polices fault because they could've told everyone to leave except the Ramseys.
I guess the cops got paid off. One down two to go. Still here. One pf the two or patsy did it. Patsy passed away of cancer. She was quiet. But she knows who did it. The two left knows who killed jb. One. Or the other knows. Everything is. A set up. Staged for the murder. The whole case is a set up. Lets all pray for jonbenet. All two of them will meet jesus. He is the judge and jury. John and burke will dearly suffer. The conciquences. The guilty one is still alive. Hey burke. You surely know something to. Now who did it. Did you get a pay check to from daddy to stay quiet. Or loose your life. Money talks and crap walks.
The "intruder" would have needed some light to write by, as well. And more time and light to go through the house to find all the items that were used to commit the crime -- neglecting to search for, or take away, any valuables from the rich house while doing so, by the way. The more you think about it, the more nonsensical the kidnapping/ransom-note story becomes.
Also why leave the note when she died? For one at least more than one person was involved because how did 1 person write the note while holding her and where it was written or wrote it before she was taken but it would of took time and someone might come down. It doesn't make sense
An intruder waltzes into the house to partake in a diligently premeditated kidnapping, but decides not to bring a ransom note and instead take their sweet time writing one once they’ve already broken in using the family’s own paper and pen which they wouldn’t even know would be there. Then the perpetrator manages to get to Jon Benet & murder her without alerting anyone in the home, only to then leave the body behind, forfeiting the ransom. If you believe that for a second you’re a loon.
Hippie Dachshunds I agree. It was very theatrical. But think about it. The alleged intruder wanted to mock the family and fantasized the murder. It was never a ransom note. The girl was never going to survive. It was to throw them off. To make them suffer.
Hippie Dachshunds people who think it is a family member just do not understand that this note contains the profile of the killer. And that profile does not match any of the family members.
Exactly, Ginevra Style this was never an actual kidnapping..The person or persons that did this was out for blood and I believe that John Ramsey had done something in his past that caused this to happen..He probably doesn't even know who or why but I agree this was all staged fro many different reasons..
@@judyholiday1794 I have watched a documentary that will challenge this idea. It is really a good documentary. Here's the link: www.dailymotion.com/video/x1xanjr
This guy saved my life. Seriously, I had a bad bout of insomnia, I hadn't slept for over 4 days and it was getting rough! I had tried everything-including pills. However god lined this old miracle up inside my que and I shit you not I didn't even finish the video. Pure bliss. I woke up 2 days later with the biggest smile on my face since 2013. Man to this day I was able to tell my doctor to stop prescribing me my meds. You think im playing, but this man is a gift from God
@@sheilasmith7779 All 5 of them ? And one of them decides to kill the little girl instead of kidnap her, then sits down for an hour and writes a 3 page ransom note ? That makes no sense. IMO, the only reasonable theory is that a family member killed her then the other(s) covered it up.
@@sheilasmith7779 OK there is a 99% chance it was a family member and a 1% chance that one of a handful of people who knew of the bonus decided to kill a child and then sit for an hour in the house writing a silly, rambling, 3 page ransom note. FBI agents have said that they have never seen a ransom note like that. Every time it's usually something like, "We have your child. We want a million dollars. We will call you for further instructions."
I don't think the ransom note is genuine. I think the murderer was trying to frame Patsy. Consider this: The note was written in a hand *like* Patsy's, but not exactly alike. There was also evidence of a practice "draft" in the house. This makes sense if somebody was trying to copy her handwriting. Also, the note is very long and the handwriting is not rushed. If Patsy faked the note after her daughter died - this would be super bizarre. Sure she would have the time to make it, but would somebody in panic mode spend that time to make such a long, bizarre note, and even make a first draft? When a simple "we have your child, leave the money here by this time or you'll never see her again" would have sufficed as a cover up, and been far less suspicious? That said, John and Patsy both knew a lot more than they let on. They misdirected the investigation, and they kept putting off their police interviews - they only consented once it became obvious they were the prime suspects.
@@sheilasmith7779 One thing that doesn't make sense is the garrot. Specifically the paintbrush part. There is absolutely no reason the paintbrush had to be broken to work. The killer could have left the brush intact, but instead its ends were broken off. This is one of those minor details most overlook, and yet it's so baffling, and the breaking of the brush is so intentional, that it must be of significance. So what purpose did breaking the ends of the brush off serve? Possibly to disguise the object - to make it not look like a brush, which I suppose makes sense if Patsy did it and didn't want her brush to be recognized as a brush. But on the other hand, putting the broken off part of the brush in with Patsy's art supplies would either be monumentally careless if Patsy did it, or an obvious attempt to plant evidence to link Patsy to the weapon. I don't think Patsy would be dumb enough to break the brush so it doesn't look like a brush anymore, and then just toss the parts that were removed back in with her other items, completely obliterating the whole point of disguising the brush in the first place.
"Customer survey" had me chuckling So much in plain sight in this case The most glaring point is that John Ramsey went to the basement. Thanks for covering this You brought clarity to it
When I was in highschool, our forensics teacher had us rewrite the ransom note. If I remember correctly, it took the class between 20-30 minutes- some people did write with their left hand because some of us theorized patsy wrote it with her non dominant hand. You can’t convince me an intruder wasted almost a half hour writing a ransom note on paper that was already in the home.
Exactly. And for whom English is a second language. "Foreign faction" would be precise, to the point. Only American writers (the parents) would ramble using tv, movie references, and sound overly motherly (concerned about wellbeing).
So bizzare, a kid is missing, but no one searched the house right away? When I was a kid, my brother disappeared. We found him a few hours later unharmed. But I recall, even as a child, looking EVERYWHERE for him. In every cupboard, behind furniture, under furniture, in the car, even in the bottom of the swimming pool. How could the police and the family sit around in the house for SEVEN HOURS before searching the house. Then the police are asking for a search to happen to see if anything is out of place (not looking for the missing child, just looking to see if there is anything out of place). I think if the parents had anything to do with it, they would most certainly have not asked for the same amount of money as John received for his bonus.
The fact that has made up my mind is the fact that the detective had to tell both John and patsy that 10 am had passed. Parents who knew their daughter was already dead would not realize what time it was but parents that thought their daughter was kidnapped and still alive would have both been glued to the telephone from 9 to 11. Shame on those parents.
Same here. Very telling that 10:00 am came and went, with no call from the kidnappers, and the Ramseys had totally forgotten about that part of the ransom note. For me, it is like a smoking gun of sorts.
Same. I grew up on this case and every year I hope that they find the real killers with new forensic techniques, but as Dr. Grande points out, it’s the Dad!!! Get him now!! Are they still alive?
WHY did the parents lie and say their son, JonBenet's brother, was asleep the entire time they were looking for their daughter. They did not want to bother him to find missing child. Yet as an adult, the brother confesses that he was awake late that night during a commotion about his sister. Uh ohhhh.
The first officer on the scene soon after JonBenet's "kidnapping" was reported said that the ransom note indicated the 8-10am time frame of which to expect a call from the "kidnappers". She went onto say that 10am came and went & there was no mention from either parent that the deadline imposed by the ransom note had come and gone. Enough said!
There is something peculiar about this note that does not seem to have been picked up by anybody. First of all banks are closed on Boxing Day so how could John Ramsey have got his money out. The kidnapper says that bank authorities are not to be alerted so John couldn't have asked the bank to open up especially for him. Unless of course America is different than England and banks are open on Boxing Day!
The note said "we will call tomorrow". As (ostensibly, at least) no one knows whether the note was composed the previous day or the morning it was found, "Tomorrow" might well have meant the following day - the day after Boxing Day.
@@donnamaree4920 Thank you Donna Maree for your message. I have always understood that tomorrow meant Boxing Day being as the note was supposedly written on Christmas Night, but of course they could well have meant the 27th. A lot of confusion has been caused in my mind because I didn't realise that Boxing Day in America is not considered a Bank Holiday. Therefore I wondered how the kidnappers expected John Ramsey to go to the bank on a bank holiday looking at it from the UK perspective. I have only recently found out that the Banks in America are open on the 26th.
Dr. Todd a very important clue is in the note. In DR. Phill's interview with Burke. Burke used the word (Hence)' On page two of the Ransom note top middle the word (and Hence was used. ) Patsy wrote the note. Burke was raised in a family that would use that word on a normal daily basis for it to be in his vocabulary. A kidnapper would never use a word like that. Burke blew it in the interview. Patsy wrote the note. She spent the entire night trying to save the family from being convicted of the murder. She never went to bed.
@@giantsofdelawarecounty if they both did, then likely burke learned it from patsy, but patsy still wrote the ransom note, a 9 yr old isnt going to write one, after all, he doesnt want a ransom bc HE is the one who did it
@@clairepaterson2374 yes, I'm not saying they aren't foreign, I'm saying no one calls themselves foreign. You are not foreign to yourself. They might have used the word "international." At any rate, the point is moot since it's very clear Patsy wrote that letter.
I’d first be in shock and denial and think maybe it was a prank and check if she’s in bed, then I’d check if Burke is in bed. I’d get Burke up to stay near me. Then I’d wake up my husband and call police. I probably would not have read the letter carefully or even the whole thing until at least my husband was up. I’d probably let him read it while I was calling police if he wasn’t already running around the house himself. I almost forgot that back in those days people used landlines so walking around the house while on the phone wouldn’t be an option. I’d tell the police “I found a ransom note saying someone kidnapped my daughter. I can’t find my daughter. It said not to call the police. What do I do?” I’m the type of person who understands when someone becomes useless for what I need and if I’m just waiting for police to arrive, unless they told me not to, I’d then leave the phone off the hook and frantically run around the house calling out her name with a bat or something so they could hear me scream if someone attacks me (mama bear don’t care about getting hurt when child is in danger) all the while hoping it was a joke so I could come back and say false alarm. My paranoia levels would go through the roof. I’d check if anything seemed out of place or unusual taking mental notes. I would try not to tear up the house destroying any evidence, I’d just run around looking. I’d be highly in tune with whether it felt like I was being watched. I’d look out the windows to check for any parked cars or people walking around. I’d check if any doors or windows were unlocked or open. I wouldn’t call friends over because when something like that happens I don’t trust anyone.
Police did check that morning. Also fleet white searched the house. White even ooened door where she was and couldnt find light swit ch . He didnt see her.
I don’t understand how, even with a ransom note and thinking it’s a kidnapping, that the Ramseys didn’t search every single inch of that house themselves when they realized Jonbenet was missing. If that was my kid I would have torn my entire house apart searching even if I suspected they weren’t there. Especially the hidden away places like where she was found. That never made sense to me why they didn’t bother searching for her in the home very well. Pretty sure Officer Doofy was the lead investigator on this case
As a mom, I would search the house immediately. I'd make my husband and anyone else in the home search too. Police definitely should have searched, systematically when they first got there.
Yes, most likely. I watched a program back in 2000 also with a Psychologist, and his input was, based on behavior of the Ramsey's, his opinion was they didn't do it, but they likely knew who did.
Feel bad laughing during this analysis but you’re commentary on the ransom note was hilarious. But you’re right! It was the kindest and well written ransom note I’ve ever heard of. Great thoughts on this case.
I'm sure the note is fake, but the reasons given are not proof of it being fake by any means. This guy (and nearly everyone in the comments) has obviously never studied the psychological behavior of criminals. Sociopaths and psychopaths in particular USUALLY ARE perfectly calm and collected at the scene of a crime. Guilty people also very commonly try to stage a different crime to throw the cops off, not realizing how ridiculous their fake crime looks. I could go on and on. This whole video is absurd and this guy comes across as remarkably arrogant.
Years late to this video but I think we all agree that the moment John went downstairs and found her and moved her was the second this case was absolutely effed in terms of being solved. The second they let slip that the parents were being interviewed as suspects and they stopped cooperating was the final nail in the coffin. I think if they kept interrogating them we would have confessions.
Me too. I have NO training in this area whatsoever (I'm a network analyst) but find this very interesting. Dr. Brande does with 'people' what I do with network systems. That's fascinating. In truth. . . his work is more interesting :-) For what I know (which isn't much) the note is way over the top for someone in a hurry and I feel strongly it was written by a women.
Great video! I just recently started learning about the facts of this case. I majored in criminal justice and I never actually got a job in my field and I feel like I'm waisting my detective mind. haha. The one thing that really stood out to me, was literally five minutes before I watched your video, I watched a video where John Ramsey made a comment about how he did not watch movies and him and Patsy rarely watched movies. I thought the comment was extremely odd and out of place in the interview. There was no reference to watching movies and he basically just added the comment in the interview which I found bizarre. It was bothering me why he made that comment and then I came across your video. The fact that the ransom note contained movie references is crazy. I feel someone in that house has the answers and it's a shame that probably no one will find out what happened.
Why would you call police and all those friends to come when the ransom note implied they would kill her if you did?? Makes it hard to believe an intruder wrote that note.
@Fly by night I totally agree. No real kidnapper/murderer would take the time to sit down and write a "ransom note" using the family notepad. Risking a family member waking up when they heard a disturbance in the house in the middle of the night. That "ransom note" sealed it for me in my mind that it was a family member. JonBenet was already dead. They were instituting a coverup and sadly it worked. In my opinion. Allegedly. Don't come for me Ramseys. Think Madeleine McCann case.
@Tina Thompson I have always thought that their close couple-friends, that were also the Ramsey's neighbors, were somehow involved. I can't recall if law enforcement took samples of their DNA or not, but they should have. John and the neighbor guy went down in the basement together when they asked Jon and Patsy to check the entire house.
It is the note that makes it clear the Ramseys were involved. IF they didn't write it they would have been pouring over every detail in it before the cops arrived. They would have eyes glued to the phone waiting for a ransom call. They would not have called anyone but the police. The way they disregarded the notes instructions and the threat of some foreign faction makes it clear they are not afraid of any kidnapper involvement.
Fly by night... to me it seems quite obvious that it was NOT Patsy Ramsey. Number one: why would she use her own pad of paper and her own paintbrush? Doesn't that seem just a little too "convenient "? Also… I'm no expert whatsoever, but I can tell male handwriting from female handwriting most of the time. (I was a psychology student once upon a time)!The letters used in that note are clearly male. Now...I have done some thing in my lifetime that was designed to throw people off. I'm right handed. But out of silliness or whatever, I've used my left hand and I purposely did not use the same structure or loops in my letters. I also changed my typical sentence structure and purposely misspelled some words. It ends up not looking like my writing.
Notice that the ransom notes begins with the words: "Mr. Ramsey ... but ends with the words: "it's up to you now John." That's a very PERSONAL comment. The writer knows the family intimately.
I think you're on the right track but I've long had a bit of a theory of my own on the murder which fits exactly with yours. The $119,000 ransom which as said is the exact number of John's bonus. Very few would have knowledge of that number; those in the family/friends circle, those at John's bank where he deposited that bonus and those that worked closely with John at his job. That said, I don't think the motive ever was the bonus money but that Jonbenet was always the target ... maybe not for kidnapping though. Lets say a co-worker of John's who is either below him on the corporate ladder or younger than him ends up with a "fascination" over JonBenet that only a sick mind could have. Lets say that man broke into the house in either stalker/voyeur mode or a much more sinister. If she caught him or tried drawing attention maybe it was then and there that he decided to take her with him and figured a fake ransom note would be a way of throwing people off giving him a chance to get way with her. Maybe the mistake he made which would create a link would be the $119,000 number. It limits suspects to those who knew the exact amount of John's bonus. My guess would be that he initially planned to get away through the basement when he heard someone come home but Jonbenet probably tried drawing attention and he killed her to keep her quiet and stayed in that closet/room until after everyone went to sleep or left. Considering John was the President and CEO of a Lockheed Martin subsidiary he''d have plenty of subordinates and quite a few of them would be younger which would explain the "Mr. Ramsey" written on the ransom note. This is just my theory, but you're 100% right ... I think this whole thing was personal.
Who doesn’t look the house over, top to bottom, when they discover their child is missing from their bed? I would’ve turned my house upside down and continued to do so....
First of all, this isn't about you. You have no idea how you would react in that situation. And, JonBenet wasn't just 'missing', the note said she was kidnapped. John & Patsy quickly checked her room and Burke's room. Patsy then IMMEDIATELY called 911. Nothing wrong with that! You do know the Ramsey home was huge, over 7,000 s/f and 4 floors, right? Just to put that into perspective, there were 8 bathrooms alone in their home. DNA from an unknown male left on JonBenet's body eliminated the Ramseys as suspects over a decade ago. Boulder Police Dept. has cleared them, and they continue to search for the perp, as it is an open and ongoing investigation. All scientific evidence points to an intruder and away from the Ramseys. You can't change science. Science doesn't lie, but trolls on YT certainly do.
DARK HORSE , a natural reaction is to check your home, no matter how many floors there are.. here’s the kicker, they didn’t get any money! Nor was there a call from the kidnapper. And just bc the Ramsey’s were cleared doesn’t mean they weren’t involved.. yeah they checked her room , ... I do know how I would react .. bc my children mean everything to me and I wouldn’t stop looking to make sure all unturned stone s have looked at.. I know I wouldn’t just wait! When she was in the house that night.. ppl who don’t have children wouldn’t know how they would react.. that Ransom letter , 3 pages was to throw off suspension.. no kidnapper , will right a letter, and be all formal about it.. they would get to the point and the point is about money.. which they didn’t receive.. your right This isn’t about me it’s about JonBent and she deserves justice.. the killer needs held accountable.. and I happen to care, about her and other children .. she didn’t deserve this, and it’s funny that the killer quickly knew what room she was in , since the house was 4 levels... there’s new technology out every yr , so it’s about time for a fresh look at this case and should be looked at from scratch!!!!
The note was likely a failed attempt to remove the body from the home in a large suitcase, completing the cover up as a kidnapping. The $118k was exactly John's bonus amount and what the Ramseys knew was in their account so they wouldn't have delays waiting on transfers from other accounts and assets. The part about making sure John was rested first because the day would be tiring makes perfect sense if it was written by an exhausted person who'd had a long day of holiday celebrations and then was up all night because their child died in their home and they had to figure out how to cover it up. Someone desperate to get a little sleep and dreading the inevitable events of the next day which would be further exhausting.
Patsy 100% wrote that ridiculous ransom note. Like a random intruder would just happen to have handwriting so perfectly similar to hers. It's so blisteringly obvious that I don't even see how this is a "mystery" outside the courts (where the proof standards are beyond reasonable doubt). Don't know which parent actually took her life, but they both knew who killed her, and John being still alive knows to this day.
The note refers to the "body" of the little girl rather than saying she will be returned unharmed. That is a bizarre way to ask for a ransom. She was already dead at the time this note was written.
The fact that her body wasn't found before it was is the craziest part, I would have torn my house apart. Police didn't search well enough for certain, why? They were out of their depth? Too concerned with offending the Wealthy Ramseys?
No one can say anything based on that. They thought anything, except that the girl would be dead in the basement when it was a circumstance in which they thought they were dealing with a possible kidnapping. The basement was probably out of her reach so that she or her brother wouldn't go in there unsupervised. It's even more complicated because in JonBenet's pajamas unknown DNA was found and not compatible with anyone in the house.
We had a murder/ suicide next door to us in FL. The police never even went around the outside of the house. Where the body was. Helicopters called, dogs, massive 2 hour search...wasting tons of taxpayer $. Pls do the obvious first!
@@mariec.albuquerque6446It is well known that it could be touch DNA from a factory worker who handled her clothing. I mean it was touch DNA. That can be from anyone who has ever been in contact with an item or article.
Can DNA be transferred purposely by one of the family members by being out somewhere and maybe have gloves on and intentionally take a napkin or something and place it where someone else could get their DNA on it and then one of the family members take that napkin and transfer the DNA to JonBenet's body to throw investigators off with the idea of a intruder?
It's like the police in that town don't know how to police. Getting civilians to do the house search, not questioning people with any sort of method. Tragically ridiculous.
In Patsys 911 call she says “we have a kidnapping!” The language she uses throughout the call is similar to what’s written in the note like “we have your daughter” it’s more like she’s reporting on the case like she’s not emotionally connected to her daughter. A sign of guilt.
@@ohdear2275 Where did you find this information? On how someone who is stressed out and in shock would act? I would want to distance myself from it too. When you call police - 9-1-1, most highly intelligent people get to the point quickly. Autism also probably runs in this family. Very high functioning - just bc people don't behave like YOU doesn't mean they murdered their kid.
The commentator said there was no motive. It could have been an accident, kids get on parents nerves and parents overreact. Only God knows what happened. Poor police work. Not sure it would have mattered though. He would have had good lawyers.
It's apparent to me that the local police were intimidated by the Ramsey's social status and hesitated to perform a serious investigation at the start.
The Boulder PD were a Community Watch Policing system and the investigators on this case had no experience investigating homicides. The lead investigator was a Bunko Cop, not a Homicide investigator. They were not intimidated by John Ramsey. He had no political status within Boulder. They had only lived in Colorado for 3 years. The issues were political between the Chief of police and the Boulder DA. The Govenor and 5 other County DA's were also involved. There were 3 world renowned pathologists/Medical examinors/Coroners examined Jonbenet's case. They agreed, the evidence was such a mess, they could not make Heads or tails of what happened. The Boulder PD came up with their theory of what they believed happened and tried to make the evidence fit their theory rather than the other way around. The evidence is supposed to tell the story. This is why the Grand Jury could not make a case to indite anyone.
We citizens of Colorado were kept updated on this case annually until the Boulder DA announced the Ramsey's were cleared of this murder a few years ago, after Patsy's death.
Punishment is for poor people. Cops have always existed for the protection of the wealthy, so it shouldn’t be surprising when the rich get away with murder.
Yeah in general Social status does confuse the behaviour of the police towards suspects. Professionals tend to be held in high esteem. However I am totally horrified by this Psychological situation that we know so much.
Suspicious, right? Wouldn't you think they would become tense if they kidnapper did not call? I bet they were so worried about what was going to happen to them that they lost track of time.
I agree, that it essentially unbelievable under any circumstances.. You would be livid and scared out of your mind at what that meant that they did not call. All of your hopes would have been riding on that phone call in the desperate hope that you'd hear her voice.
@@ogpigeon4431 They were probably also very worried that they did not know how they were going to explain why there was no call. It was probably a relief for John Ramsey when the officer told him and his friend to search the home because they no longer had to hold onto a kidnapping story that was becoming less believable with more time.
I was bothered by how nonchalant John Ramsey acted when the time came for the phone call. You’d think John and Patsy would be very eager or nervous to answer the phone but they weren’t. John was looking at his mail casually like a normal day . Bizarre Plus, John still planned on traveling to Atlanta even after finding out his daughter was just brutally murdered! I mean, if my kid was just murdered I have to believe I’d cancel all flights and stay home to just either help the police or maintain peace of mind
@harry pag You can't *give up* your PhD. Do you even know what a PhD is? lol I agree that he's similar to Jerry Springer, but he's Jerry Springer with a doctorate. He might not be licensed to practice clinical psychology, but he has a PhD, so it's perfectly legitimate for him to go by Dr.
Understand this Patsy was a born bred West Virginian. They are raised very different and I am not trying to be mean just the psychology of some people in her area of this country! Out of Love ( in her mind) was jbr doing these pageants as she did and she loved it didn't look it at it like warped sexual idea!
@@rachelcoloradomy3kidz778 I agree with what you're saying, and I won't judge someone's heart in the matter, but I still feel that making a 5 yr old up like an adult hooker and parading her around on a stage in scanty clothing is problematic on its face and I do question the thinking of ppl who participate in such things.
@Cuck ButtFurd Bingo! And there is your motive! The girl didn't want to do that anymore, it is no fun for a child at all. So this "ungrateful b1tch" who didn't "appreciate" what her "dear mother" had done "for her" was probably beaten by the mother who saw her dream crumble. Maybe it was better for the girl to get out that night. Growing up with a mother like that is not healthy and won't lead to a normal life. Ask me how I know that. No, rather don't.
Reading and seeing a number of takes on this fascinating case over the years, I was interested in hearing what you had to say. In my opinion, the best analysis I've seen has been from former head of the FBI Profiling unit, John E. Douglas, in his book The Cases That Haunt Us. He seems to give more credence than you to the exculpatory factors regarding the parents, but your thoughts are otherwise pretty interesting. To your point about the police making a mistake pushing the Ramseys into getting legal representation early, I think there is no shortage of mistakes the Boulder Police made, including not controlling the crime scene (admitting visitors, sending John and friend to search the house), solely focusing on the Ramseys as suspects initially, misinterpretation of evidence, etc. The lack of a united front in the department has also led to a lot of mostly-misinformed hounding of this family by "hobbyists."
Also, I found this in a book on the case: When you find a ransom note, you should not find a dead body. When you find a dead body, you should not find a ransom note, it's just stupid.
Maybe they weren’t anticipating actually having to pretend to discover the body maybe they thought that the cops would come talk to them and then not stay at their house so they could hide the body somewhere else but when they realize that the cop was going to stay there he pretended to find her
@@mulemule I was thinking that too, and was going to look it up to make sure,,, thought i would read down to see if somebody else said that,,, I will buy you a beer for that one
I know I told him that the other day. He has a dry sense of humor. He will be talking about the case all of a sudden he will sa something out of left field. I don't know i ever body catches that.
I love Dr. Grande´s sarcasm: "It´s like the kidnappers saying to the parents: ´Brush your teeth before you leave the house´, ´Rate from 1 to 5. How much did you like the kidnapping?" 😆
Yeah... I can't appreciate his "sarcasm" .... And I generally like sarcasm. Maybe it's the circumstances involved , a small child's murder probably not a topic to implement sarcasm . He seems more satirical in his discourse to me
Other weird evidence: she was eating pineapple in a bowl when she died. The "intruder", in his haste, would have had to have stopped the kidnapping, made her a snack, hung out in the kitchen while she ate it, and then got back to business. There is zero chance somebody from outside of that house did this. There's also no way the Ramsey's planned the killing to go down that way. It was probably an accident and subsequent cover-up.
@Orion way more evidence the mom did it, imo. Bed wetting, physical evidence, the pineapple thing, the shoddy cover- up, the fact she didn't immediately call the police. If Burke did it, her immediate reaction would have been saving her daughter's life, not fearing legsl trouble for a 6 year old, or whatever he was, imo.
If it WAS an accidental death, why ... tell the world it was something else. Also, if it WAS an accident, the kid wouldn't be found garroted in a spare room adjacent to their basement, with a smashed-up skull. Also, would an "accident" really leave traces of semen on the victim!? It couldn't possibly have been an accident. I've always wavered between thinking Patsy was guilty or not. I just know loving parents are not going to damage the body of their child!!
The brother acted very strange on doctor phil, I have a feeling Ramsay’s brother killed her and the parents covered it up because they were scared of not just losing their daughter but also their son to the jail system.
This is a case which definitely has many problematic matters, and was one that saw me become interested in forensic issues. Thank you for dealing with this crime and the various individuals involved and especially for your deadpan humour analysing this case! I happen to think Patsy wrote that 'ransom note' and that the killer(s) were in the family.
I agree. James Kolar's book does a brilliant job in debunking the intruder theory. Also, if you look at the kind of person Patsy was, it makes sense that she would cover for Burke rather than risk losing him. It would have been a black mark on the family's reputation, and Patsy was very into the image of the 'perfect' family.
@@Ac2091-x1f The problem with using a specific amount the same as the bonus is this. Would you write a note like that to hide a crime you've committed and use a specific amount in such a way that could point to you as the perpetrator? Doesn't make sense to me at all. Unless Patsy was especially dimwitted.
The parents' first reaction was to leave the state and lawyer up. That is not a normal reaction for a family that has just lost a child. That was the first giveaway for me. Then the paper being in the house. Then the exact amount of his bonus being mentioned in it.
Well if I find my baby girl dead in a cold basement floor I moving out .. have an open mind.. Google facts of the case instead of countless comments that it was Burke an a crazy all night cover up
EXACTLY... just 2 nights ago our cat didn't wake my husband up at 2am like he always does... so there's my husband walking up and down the street in his slippers and gown, looking for our baby boy. That's why I married him. Too precious!
Lais, There are other ways to hint that you are single. Also if a note read “we have your precious Jinksey cat and demand a ransom” would you assume the cat was still in the house
To adress the sexual assault: We have to be accurate here. She was penetrated by a part of a wooden paintbrush but she was not raped. Points more to a person she trusted and she was familiar with. Moreover after her death her intimate area was wiped, a duct tape was put over her mouth, she was wrapped in her favorite blanket that was stored in a room far from the room where her body was found. Points to someone who cared about her. The big picture is unambiguous. She was probably accidentally killed in the heat of the moment and then the parents staged her body & the crime scene to cover it up to protect their reputation/social status and to protect their sole stream of income - John´s job.
Yeah, and 'take a big enough attaché with you to the bank.' What a bizarre instruction for a 'small foreign faction' to make. As if they would care about anything but getting the money. What a joke.
Sounds like the psychological mindset of an businessman, one who is used to doing customer service. Maybe even someone that is "Entrepreneur of the Year" with his new secretary writing the note for them.
If my kid was missing, I would have searched every room, closet or space that she could possibly be. Seems like hours passed while she was in the basement. 🤷♀️
@@Rachel-467 the fact that they let the crime scene be disturbed and having the dad and a friend searching the house, just a pathetic excuse of an investigation.
@Jenny Jay. JonBenet was just 'missing'. JonBenet's parents woke up, there was a ransom note left saying she was kidnapped. They quickly checked her room and Burke's and immediately called 911. Nothing wrong with that! Boulder police were there within minutes, and searched the home. The Ramsey home was huge, over 7,000 s/f.
@@darkhorse9472 the police didn’t find her, her dad and Fleet found her... so the police didn’t search very well either.... I’m not trying to be mean, I understand that you don’t know what you would do in a situation like this, it just seems like a lot of things went very wrong with the investigation. ☮️
@@jennyjay7816 Fleet and JR found JonBenet, because the Boulder Police Dept. had no experience with a kidnapping, and refused help from the FBI. When the Ramseys called 911, they trusted the police to do their job...and yes, a thorough search, but we know how that went. The door where JonBenet was, on the other side, was not opened by BP, because it was locked from the outside. They were searching for an exit by the kidnappers, and for clues and evidence of a kidnapping...not her body. The Ramsey home was massive, with 8 bathrooms alone. The bathroom in the basement had evidence of an intruder.
Me too. I suspect it was an accident but they were too scared of what would happen to so and so... the 911 call there’s a person saying “I’m sorry I’m sorry” in the background... logically that would be John...
@@sjworrier0613 Another "family affair" much like Brian Laundrie and his parents. They all cover for each other and try to trick the cops into looking in the wrong direction. Perhaps the long note was simply an attempt to do that. The cops were negligent and sloppy in both cases. A lot of people, like me, were quite suspicious of Jon Benet's brother right from the start because of jealousy due to all the attention paid to his sister.
Well, i dont like how far those childerns beauty pageants go with exploiting these girls...often, i think there should be an 'evaluation' on some of the parents who push it as a lifestyle.
@@LaniAnne402 yes. And random pedos don't hang out at beauty pageants. There's not even an audience to speak of, it's just all the kids' pageant moms. In fact if a person was there who didn't have a child in the competition they would immediately stick out.
If they found the ransom note right away I guess it wouldn't make much sense to search the house. At least not for the girl.. but for evidence sure. Nobody would think the kid is still in the house after they found a ransom note stating that it got kidnapped.
@@quasimobius I'm not from the U.S. so I can't really comment on that. But I'm on the same page as Dr. Grande. It seems likely they are guilty in some way
@@Capiiable I believe Jonbenet becoming school age factored into her being killed. They, the schools tell the kids they don't have to take abuse from anyone and to come forward and tell. I think the dad was playing sex games on the child and when she thought she saw a light at the end of the tunnel, she came out and actually told her abuser she didn't have to take it anymore and she was going to tell, and that provoked an extreme reaction. It was a crime of passion.
Writing a 2 page (!) ransom note, feels like something very personal ,the exact amount of ransom money and the concern processing the ransom money....i believe it was someone in the family
No one committing such a crime would delay leaving the scene of the crime to leisurely write a long, drawn out ransom note on the homeowners notepad. Ridiculous.
Perhaps.? But ....the Motive..?? Even Dr Grande can't come up with one. Also , at one point he mentions DNA...from a non family member but never refers to it again..??
I agree. Demanding the exact amount of the bonus is very telling. I do not recall whether it had been stated that the amount of John's bonus had been perhaps printed in the newspaper or announced on a news story?
I don’t feel right about laughing during the breakdown of this case, but your comments about the letter made me. If only everyone in the world had your sensible point of view.
@@michaeldelguercio339 Do you have evidence John Ramsey 'went directly 2 her bc he knew x-actly were she was !'? Didn't think so. There is no evidence to support your statement.
Your analysis of this crime was fascinating. I have been a criminal defense lawyer for some 25 years and am a mother of a son and daughter. I followed this murder closely as it happened. I watched the coverage, read as much information about he case as possible, and watched the interviews of the family. I agree with most everything you said and especially agree that Patsy wrote the note. Here are my thoughts and theroies: The killer was one of the three people in the house. I don't see Patsy as the killer. But I do see Patsy writing the note. Patsy's motive for writing the note obviously was to protect the killer and Patsy had to have known who killed JonBenet. After all, only two other people were in the house. You said that you thought John was the mostly likely candidate to be the killer. And Bert, the least likely. That analysis makes sense except for one thing. I cannot imagine any mother -- and Patsy seemed like a reasonably stable mother who loved her daughter -- who would protect her husband whom she knew had killed her daughter. The only person Patsy would cover for is her son, her only remaining child. He may have been able to give good interviews but it just does not make sense to me that Patsy would allow the killer of her daughter to get away with it if it were her husband. Real motherly love does not do that. This is only my opinion and of course is not based on any first hand knowledge. So, having said that: Thank you for your analyses. I love hearing what you have to say about the various criminals' mental states.
Yes! Totally agree with your well-reasoned speculation. She wouldn’t cover up the murder unless it was committed by her own son...almost the way Casey Anthony’s parents *know* she killed her daughter but still protected her.
“Foreign”. Yessir if I am over in England I would refer to myself in a ransom note “a small FOREIGN faction.” Who calls themselves a foreign or foreigner ??
Dr Grande is brilliant at boiling a case right down to its essentials, very dry and forensic. Stephanie Harlowe also did an excellent analysis, in which she examined the background of Patsy and John, giving an insight into the personalities involved. Actions which seem, prima facie, outre and bizarre, have a crazy sort of rationale once you understand the outre and bizarre people who enact them!
I can't believe they don't use backtrack DNA to build a profile. That, and an incredibly verbose ransom note. Who's verbose? Who's verbose and powerful? Handwritten? They're practically handing it to you on a platter.
When you watch the ReeTV series on this, you’ll realise that all these other true crime channel just repeat the official agreed upon story and aren’t interested in getting to the truth!!!
EXACTLY! Does anyone have a "motive" to kill a child? Perhaps all killers have one in mind, but it is not necessarily apparent to others. Someone in that house lost it and hit a little girl, killing her. Then, someone staged a coverup. Patsy was "Mrs. Perfect". She would never have allowed her son to have been known as the one who killed her daughter, even if it was an accident. She absolutely wrote that B movie ransom letter. It is a shame that there was no justice.
Amen, Sister Sandra! You said it all in bottom one line: Money will bail you out of jail for a lifetime when you kill your kid or steal from every client who did business with scumbag murderous Dad.
Dont ignore the sons age. 2 10 yr old boys, kidnapped a toddler from a shopping mall, molested, repeatedly struck him with rocks, killed him and tied him to train tracks in the UK. Kids dont need a motive and are very capable of evil.
@@ru.kiddingme it was Patsy writing with her non dominant hand. There were videos where she denied writing things she obviously did, in similar handwriting.
This case makes me happy my country has banned children's beauty pageants. The amount of suspects they had that were oddly fond of JonBenet is terrifying. The suspect list would've been so much smaller had she just been a normal little girl instead of a famous child beauty queen.
My ears perked up when he said Patsy was frustrated with bedwetting, because that's an indicator of sexual abuse. Now here's blatant speculation: It sounds like a _motive_ if JonBenet told her mom. Maybe she was complicit and worried JonBenet would tell someone else, maybe she wasn't and saw it, not as horrific child abuse but, as JonBenet being preferred over her, and she could get her husband firmly back under her control by a) taking away the little girl he wanted more than her, and b) holding the abuse over his head to control him. Just spitballing here but there have been and are a scary amount of cases where moms were complicit in the abuse, married their husbands on the condition that he could abuse their daughters, or killed their daughters _because_ they were being molested _specifically_ to remove competition.
@@THEFRISKIESTDINGO I agree with the point about bedwetting. Admittedly the probability of sexual abuse given bedwetting is still low (lots of children wet the bed at that age) so it's not exactly a smoking gun, the probability of bed wetting given sexual abuse at that age is pretty high so it is certainly consistent with that.
Three cheers for the law in your country concerning child beauty pageants P.s. to the last 2 comments. Sometimes the bedwetting Theory feels like a bit of a decoy. Realistically, the vaginal damage could be due to the bedwetting.. Perhaps getting stuck on one theory could be the reason why this case has never been solved
What about dance competitions? I was utterly shocked by shows such as Dance Moms, with kids in skimpy, revealing costumes, plastered with stage makeup, often with wigs, hairpieces and bleached hair, performing skills that included them opening their legs, gyrating, etc. I can just picture these competitions being an absolute magnet for all kinds of predators.
Police negligence. Just terrible police work. The local cops had no experience in cases like this. Very unfortunate that her killer was never brought to justice.
@@vampireslayer1989 I thought it might have been her brother? He flipped into a rage after JonBenet took some of his pineapple and milk, perhaps? I thought I'd heard this. He then lashed out (he had a temper, apparently, right?), she falls/was pushed, and fatally lands/bangs her head, or whatever. I dunno...!
Such a tragic case. But I nearly lost it when you said, “How would you rate this kidnapping experience?” Shows how ridiculous the situation was and how very likely the parents did it.
When my son was about 7 I thought he was at home but I couldn’t find him. I looked thru the entire house and outside, every nook & cranny, deep into closets, cabinets etc. Turned out his dad took him somewhere or something- didn’t tell me. The point is when a child is missing, I think most parents would do what I did. No stone unturned.
In my experience, long notes are written for scams or to lie. Whenever I post something for sale a car, bicycle scammers send me offers at full price with the story that they cannot pick up the item and the long reason why. How does this relate? because whoever wrote the note, guilty of the action, feels its necessary to convince the seriousness of the note.
That's very true. I remember hearing a psychologist saying that people who are lying tend to be excessively detailed whereas true statements are generally quite concise.
@@marian6593 So let me get this straight.. the person who breaks in and steals children, rapes them and then kills them is a person who is not only logical, but of sound mind. got it.
"Good Customer Experience & Survey" hilarious along with " don't forget to ... , brush your teeth & wear your seatbelt." Lovee Dr. G's logical humor!! Love his brief, concise summaries & analysis of these cases! PLEASE do JESSICA CHAMBERS MURDER!!!
Just like it is, John Ramsey went 8 hours later, very suspicious, straight down to the basement, any normal parent would immediately search whole house first, without anyone needing to tell them
Yes He had to find the body first so he could contaminate the scene with his Dna since his was already there so It was urgent he find it first even if it looked suspicious
The police botched this! How unprofessional is a police department that doesn’t work on Christmas? So many questions could have been answered if they had done their job.
@Elize Le Roux. JonBenet wasn't LOST...the note said she was KIDNAPPED. Get it? Patsy immediately call 911, and police were there in minutes, and began to search for clues, they didn't search for HER. What is wrong with you?
A woman didn't write it. Much of the language used is directly from popular action movies around 1996. "It's up to you now!" is from Crimson Tide. There are several lines taken from Mission Impossible and Ransom, both came out in 1996. The writer also used the rule of 3s. The person was an action movie buff. I'd be curious to know what video tapes were in the Ramsey home.
To add fuel to the fire...why did Burke Ramsey spend who knows how much money to sue CBS for "defamation of character" when the Ramsey's should have sued the Boulder Police Department for sheer stupidity....which of course they would have done if they were not involved. Hey, Burke, how about throwing a million or two towards reward money for information leading to the arrest of your sister's murderer? How much did you get from that CBS settlement ? I mean, just to make it seem like you give a little damn bit about finding that hideous guy....unless you're looking at him in the mirror.
The one thing that never set right with me was they didn’t search their own house. If your child is not in the house where she is suppose to be wouldn’t you turn your house upside down looking for her.
I know right? My 6 year old finds it funny to hide from me sometimes and I check every room twice, thrice if need be till I find him
You would....unless you believed the fake ransom note you wrote yourself that she had been taken. That was their cover to NOT search
@@lindamon5101 Yes......they wanted to send the police on an out of home search so they could have time to move the body.....on a boat or private plane.....or whatever. The whole reason for the "ransome" was to divert the search
jb b if they wanted to move her out wouldn't they have just waited to call the police though?
@@JB-js4xi wrong. The intruder was caught 2m down the road months after jbr murder. This lil girls mom caught him so he fled. Lookup 14yr old assaulted after jbr
What I NEVER understood about this case (I lived in Denver at the time and the Ramsey family members were well known in the "social circuit" in Boulder) was WHY IN THE HELL were her parents not immediately separated and QUESTIONED separately to compare their stories. This should have been done immediately. The Boulder police totally screwed this case up from day one. They were known at the time as being very corrupt. Boulder was called "Disneyland" because of all the crimes that went unprosecuted. It was such a tragic case and we will NEVER know what actually happened. No justice for that poor baby girl.
In high society even police can be bought
It’s obviously just a grammatical error.
Im still holding out hope that somehow God will let it be known
At first, the police thought it was a kidnapping not a murder. Why would they separate the parents?
The cops didn't know what to do and they made HUGE mistakes.They admit that.
That "ransom" note is the single most ridiculous piece of evidence I have seen in true crime. An intruder did not write that note.
I remember so vividly at that time thinking that there was just no way that a stranger wrote that ransom letter. It was SO LONG and sounded like a random note from a movie. It actually is worded like something from a movie. The family, the mom and dad knew exactly what happenned to her.
The intruder(s) were likely in the house for hours waiting, therefore he or they had a lot of time on their hands so it's not surprising the letter was long. We are talking about very sick individual here, so common sense can't always be applied in any analysis. It's someone that knew them and the young msn who killed himself shortly after is your killer.
@@fernfreeman1729 good point.
@@deidrecoday1269 The guy who killed himself even had a similar flashlight with the one left on the kitchen counter, the Ramsay's didnt, plus his family has refused to allow LE to get a sample for his DNA.
Yes they did.
One thing that stood out for me was when the 911 operator told the police that Patsy was hysterical on her initial call but when she hung up the phone she did it improperly and the operator could hear their conversation. They were talking very calmly and it seems like her hysterics were a ruse to mislead the police. Patsy wrote the note, faked the call and almost certainly knows what actually happened.
Very interesting.
We have the recorded call. You can listen to it. Some people belive they can hear voices afterwards, but I certainly can only hear static noise that could be anything...
Yes! She was hysterical but it stopped when she thought she hung up the phone! Even if we’ll never know what was said in the background, but it sounds like normal conversation, not panicked or hysterical like Patsy JUST was.
@@maxwellsdemon10Yes but if Patsy was really upset you would hear her wailing taper off into the distance. Or hear her yell to John somewhere since you don’t hear him upset near by on the phone. Not instantly stop. Keep in mind, her only daughter has been “kidnapped”. I would think in that situation the man would call because he has a better chance of being more level headed and less hysterical. The father would be better at relaying important information, even when upset. That’s just a moment where a husband and father would take charge
@@Biggerbetterboulder1 I think extrapolating from the behaviour of people in extreme situations is almost always bad.
People act weird in stressful situations and some innocent people just act like the most guilty motherfuckers around.
What stood out to me in the ransom note was when the author wrote, "Use that good Southern common sense of yours....." There's no way a foreign faction would've written that.
lol, and no one calls their group a "small foreign faction". Oh, we're just a small little group, and if you're reading this in America, we are foreigners. lol
A woman says that
Obviously a typo. The writer meant to say, "foreign fiction."
John Ramsey wasn't even from the south...means the intruder didn't know John Ramsey personally.
@@darkhorse9472 Or it was a deliberate error to remove suspicion from someone he did know.
I'm glad you brought up the point that the Ramsey's were not concerned when the ransom deadline passed without a call. This is one of my key points for the Ramsey's being involved. I cannot think of a logical reason you would not be freaked that the kidnappers did not call unless you knew there was no kidnapping.
It was the wrong day is all
Don’t point to guilt
& they left Burke upstairs all alone. Why didn't they get him up & ask him son are you ok ? Did you see or hear anything last night ? Why were they not afraid the intruders might still be hiding in the house ? I know I'd have my other child right downstairs with me.
I’d be waiting by the phone for sure
They weren't worried when the deadline passed. They were also told to not contact anyone, police or anyone, but they called friends and family to show up. Even if you call the police, if you believe you're being watched, you don't call over the entire neighborhood.
@@terrikuykendall7580 They were waiting by the phone.
John was instructed to ask to speak to JonBenet when the call came.
Every time the phone rang Patsy collapsed as if someone punched her in the stomach.
I'm a police officer (and someone old enough to remember this case as a young adult - I was 20 when it happened) and I agree with the commenters that the Boulder Police screwed this up very badly. As soon as they got on scene, they should have gotten everyone out of the house, secured the perimeter, and obtained a search warrant. Period. This process should have been explained to the parents in a straight-forward and non-accusatory way, but none the less, it should have happened despite any objections on their part. It's absurd that the police allowed John Ramsey to re-enter the house unaccompanied. I even knew this at the time it happened as a 20 year old rather minimally trained security policeman in the Air Force. I was shocked that actual homicide detectives could make such terrible blunders.
Thank you for your service. I hope one day this tragedy will be solved.
On purpose. Paid off or otherwise compromised.
Thanks for sharing your knowledge, officer! I've always thought that this cause would be solved a great group of people like you with previous knowledge and experience all from different points of view: A lawyer, a police officer, a former judge and a district attorney.
An FBI profiler doesn't believe the Ramseys are involved and a profile of a suspect stated that he or she might commit suicide and that is what happened. One suspect did kill himself. The FBI believes 3 people are involved in this tragedy.
Thank You for your Service. Stay Safe.
I have 30 years in law enforcement and still find this case endlessly fascinating. The crime scene is so small and it got contaminated very quickly. The beginning of the story was a kidnapping which puts everyone in a different state of mind, which is "Find the trail as quickly as possible and get that child back". A kidnapping leads you away from the scene, a murder puts you at the scene. The ransom note itself is so bizarre. I don't think we will ever know the full story.
Didn't the Ramseys also call friends and family to come over? I sense more intentional crime scene contamination.
and when we find out the full story, it'll be even more unbelievable! someone could confess to killing this little girl and everyone would still think the parents did it! it's gonna be some weird nancy kerrigan/tonya harding, beauty pageant rival type thing that no one sees coming. or the maid trying to tell patsy about how she witnessed burke "innocently" molesting jonbenet and patsy really ripping her a new one! maid goes home and runs her mouth to enough friends (and her hubby) about what it's really like working for the ramsey's and it sets someone off (and the maid had a key to the house, right??). whatever the story, it will all end up making perfect, crazy, jaw-dropping sense in the end.
burke did it, he had motive, he was angry jealous for years, he struck JB on the head with the heavy flashlight, he didnt realize it wd fracture her skull, the parents covered it up bc they didnt want to lose the only child they had left. family friends confirmed they had seen violence from burke onto JB during dinners n bbqs etc. he even smeared feces on her bed and on her christmas candy. THATS ANGRY! and demented....
@@gnphillips5481 Nahhh,John all the way from family...
1)He is the one contaminated the scene
2)The one that knew about that window,that window that was broken and once before he went inside cause he lost keys...any other family members no keys??plus that window leads to that place (basement,room)that jon benet was inside???
3) That letter points John,FBI if I am correct said that based on that letter it was never about jon benet but about john that hohn made someone angry..john said that he can't think making anyone angry cause it is not on his character 🤷🤷🤷....Do you see the pattern now??
Have you read any of the books by Nick Vander leek? He has written several about this case.
I just love Dr. Grande’s dry sense of humor and subtle sarcasm. 😆
Right ??!!! These are the best!
same he is so shady i love it lol
I didn't know the Ramseys had an open window(s) to allow for one or more extension cords for outside Christmas lights. I wonder where this information comes from.
lol 👍
OK Patsy
The ransom note alone screams ridiculous cover-up
There's no evidence to support your statement that the ransom note was a 'cover-up".
It shoulda been the "smoking gun" error by the writer..wasn't no need for it..a pro sure wouldn't done it..she/he thought it would distance the whole family from having part in the death(accidental)
Ronda G patsy wrote the note look at a paper of hers and compare it
@Tabernacle of David
DNA eliminated the Ramseys. What don't you understand about DNA?
Agreed. I always thought the parents covered it up to protect their son. I've always believed her brother killed her by accident.
The father shouldn’t have been told to search the house. And everyone but the police and family should have been told to leave. The police should have been searching the house. Nuts.
Yeah that was a hella botched police investigation! It's asinine how bad that was.
The police were completely incompetent.
@@jennyclark6183 A thousand percent agree. That poor baby...wonder if we'll ever know what happened that night.
The cops did a shitty job. JonBenet was killed by her father or one of the neighbors because she fought with them because they were going to rape her AGAIN!!!!
@@kimmyhawk5612 her body didn't show signs of much a struggle like bruises. Thus, leads one to think it was someone she trusted. It's all so sad.
The only thing that note was missing was... "Sincerely, Patsy Ramsey"
Pretty savage murder for a parent. I don't think so.
@@nvfacc3569sorry have you visited reality lately? Vast majority of murders are committed by family or loved ones. Educate yourself.
@@nvfacc3569 Accidental death and cover-up, not murder, my friend. Get it right.
Yep
@@nvfacc3569 I didn't say she murdered anyone... just that she obviously wrote the note.
The ransom note is flat out hilarious. It’s amazing that there was ever any doubt about that for a second.
It is someone trying to write a kidnapping note who only has Hollywood for an example.
And of course, the note instructed the parents not to talk to anyone or Jonbenet would be killed. Then the parents called not only the police but everyone they knew, so they already knew she was dead.
IF they knew Jon Benet was already dead and in the house why leave a note period until they disposed of the body?Even a kidnapping would involve checking the whole house for clues
Dear Patty & john, I've kidnapped your precious daughter from her bedroom. She's in the cellar now dead. Xoxo, The Killer I mean COME ON. It's a red herring. And it did exactly what it was supposed to do. Cast doubt and cause chaos.
While pinpointing the exact murderer(s) and true motives is daunting, there is compelling evidence that the Ramseys were involved in the coverup. Any investigation into this murder needs to start with coverup and work its way toward the culprit.
I read that note three times. It's highly contrived and strident. Its tone matches the mother's bombastic conversational style in her interviews. The mother wrote the note.
Way to use that good southern common sense of yours Brian.
ABSOLUTELY AGREE ❤
Brian Ritchey It has never been proven the mother wrote the note and until it has been proven don't make assumptions about who did write it.
And I have read that note 3 hundred and 33 times.
Interestingly enough, only a half dozen of the 46 alphabet characters in the 1400 character note approach Patsy's identifiers. Comes to mind "a" (Patsy has three of these which are context dependent, not positional), perhaps "w", I want to say "D" or "d" (I'm doing this from memory and it's been some months), possibly "S" and "s" (but not consistent). Rather than individual letters, a more telling sign are descenders.
Patsy used two 'q's. One, as in 'quite', is formed by making a 'c' and then the reversed descent of a 'g', with complete overlap of the final descender (full loop). The second cinsists of making a descending 's', followed by closing the gap at the top to form the upper closed portion of the 'q'. These are unique enough to be indicators.
Pay close attention to the "l"s (that's lower case"L") and "y"s. The first in the ransom note invariably has a crook in it, making the "l" look like a lightening ⚡ in the Ransom note. Patsy never makes "l"s like that. Doubt if she's capable. Another noticable difference is the "y" which invariably has a hook up to the right at the bottom of the descender in the ransom note. Patsy's never do this. Again, nothing like Patsy's. Probably 90% of the note characters don't come close to Patsy's. Cina said 200 similarities or something like that. Out of 1400 characters. However, she was not presented absolute exemplars and actually analyzed a couple hundred different documents from various sources to select a most likely exemplar or set of exemplars. They supposedly came from Patsy, but the samples that I saw definitely did not. Probably JB's 😂😂.
Patsy definitely did not write the note. Police took a ton of VHS out of the houses and I'll bet not one of the movies quoted in the ransom note were in the bunch.
EXACTLY!! Admonishing him to be rested. I would believe a murder by stranger, if not for the note.
Bizzare that the police asked John to search house, and not police search.
No, bizarre that any parents would not have ALREADY torn that house apart, BEFORE any cops got there. Again, the Ramseys not reacting like normal parents.
The first detective that showed, before finding the body, said in an interview that she had to call for more officers multiple times before anyone else would show up. I place blame for not finding the killer squarely on the Boulder Police Department.
@@vian-ij4sv I listened to that interview yesterday of that detective. Very bizarre that even after finding Jon Benet’s body it took way too long for more authorities to arrive. Very poor response and what else could be going on in Boulder then more important than a murder of a child. I lived in Boulder a short time in 1979. It’s a low crime town.
The whole case is bizarre, I believe many people were also allowed to enter the house and contaminate the house :(
@@whitedragoness23 The crime scene was in the basement and nobody entered the
basement until John found JonBenet there.
Any contamination that was done was the polices fault because they could've told everyone to leave except the Ramseys.
The only thing that could have made that ransom note any more absurd was if it ended with the phrase "This message will self destruct".
😂😂😂
Yes better yet if she signed it at the end.
@@stephentresca3536😂😂😂
😂😂😂
It did, but only the part of the letter that said that self-destructed.
Yes, usually burglars want to get in and out of the house quickly. They usually wouldn't sit down and write a long note.
I guess the cops got paid off. One down two to go. Still here. One pf the two or patsy did it. Patsy passed away of cancer. She was quiet. But she knows who did it. The two left knows who killed jb. One. Or the other knows. Everything is. A set up. Staged for the murder. The whole case is a set up. Lets all pray for jonbenet. All two of them will meet jesus. He is the judge and jury. John and burke will dearly suffer. The conciquences. The guilty one is still alive. Hey burke. You surely know something to. Now who did it. Did you get a pay check to from daddy to stay quiet. Or loose your life. Money talks and crap walks.
The "intruder" would have needed some light to write by, as well. And more time and light to go through the house to find all the items that were used to commit the crime -- neglecting to search for, or take away, any valuables from the rich house while doing so, by the way. The more you think about it, the more nonsensical the kidnapping/ransom-note story becomes.
That's right.
They couldve written it before they did this
Also why leave the note when she died? For one at least more than one person was involved because how did 1 person write the note while holding her and where it was written or wrote it before she was taken but it would of took time and someone might come down. It doesn't make sense
An intruder waltzes into the house to partake in a diligently premeditated kidnapping, but decides not to bring a ransom note and instead take their sweet time writing one once they’ve already broken in using the family’s own paper and pen which they wouldn’t even know would be there. Then the perpetrator manages to get to Jon Benet & murder her without alerting anyone in the home, only to then leave the body behind, forfeiting the ransom. If you believe that for a second you’re a loon.
YEP! That''s the common sense conclusion imo.
Exactly.
And the perpetrator hangs out writing practice drafts of the note in the house before they leave the body behind.
100% agree!!!
@kyleklemm20Who is this woman?
The ransom note has always struck me as being rather theatrical. Almost like a ransom note in a murder mystery game.
Hippie Dachshunds I agree. It was very theatrical. But think about it. The alleged intruder wanted to mock the family and fantasized the murder. It was never a ransom note. The girl was never going to survive. It was to throw them off. To make them suffer.
Hippie Dachshunds people who think it is a family member just do not understand that this note contains the profile of the killer. And that profile does not match any of the family members.
Exactly, Ginevra Style this was never an actual kidnapping..The person or persons that did this was out for blood and I believe that John Ramsey had done something in his past that caused this to happen..He probably doesn't even know who or why but I agree this was all staged fro many different reasons..
@@judyholiday1794 I have watched a documentary that will challenge this idea. It is really a good documentary. Here's the link: www.dailymotion.com/video/x1xanjr
@@judyholiday1794 There is nothing in John's history suggesting violent behavior. So that is only speculation. There is no evidence supporting it.
This guy saved my life. Seriously, I had a bad bout of insomnia, I hadn't slept for over 4 days and it was getting rough! I had tried everything-including pills. However god lined this old miracle up inside my que and I shit you not I didn't even finish the video. Pure bliss.
I woke up 2 days later with the biggest smile on my face since 2013. Man to this day I was able to tell my doctor to stop prescribing me my meds.
You think im playing, but this man is a gift from God
Lol sounds like you need ASMR
😂😂😂
Lmaoooo
I feel the same way about the narrator on "Forensic Files". His voice relaxes me completely.
😂😂
The ransom note makes it difficult to believe that anyone other than the Ramseys was involved.
@@sheilasmith7779 All 5 of them ? And one of them decides to kill the little girl instead of kidnap her, then sits down for an hour and writes a 3 page ransom note ? That makes no sense. IMO, the only reasonable theory is that a family member killed her then the other(s) covered it up.
@@sheilasmith7779 OK there is a 99% chance it was a family member and a 1% chance that one of a handful of people who knew of the bonus decided to kill a child and then sit for an hour in the house writing a silly, rambling, 3 page ransom note. FBI agents have said that they have never seen a ransom note like that. Every time it's usually something like, "We have your child. We want a million dollars. We will call you for further instructions."
I don't think the ransom note is genuine. I think the murderer was trying to frame Patsy. Consider this: The note was written in a hand *like* Patsy's, but not exactly alike. There was also evidence of a practice "draft" in the house. This makes sense if somebody was trying to copy her handwriting. Also, the note is very long and the handwriting is not rushed. If Patsy faked the note after her daughter died - this would be super bizarre. Sure she would have the time to make it, but would somebody in panic mode spend that time to make such a long, bizarre note, and even make a first draft? When a simple "we have your child, leave the money here by this time or you'll never see her again" would have sufficed as a cover up, and been far less suspicious?
That said, John and Patsy both knew a lot more than they let on. They misdirected the investigation, and they kept putting off their police interviews - they only consented once it became obvious they were the prime suspects.
@@sheilasmith7779 One thing that doesn't make sense is the garrot. Specifically the paintbrush part. There is absolutely no reason the paintbrush had to be broken to work. The killer could have left the brush intact, but instead its ends were broken off. This is one of those minor details most overlook, and yet it's so baffling, and the breaking of the brush is so intentional, that it must be of significance. So what purpose did breaking the ends of the brush off serve? Possibly to disguise the object - to make it not look like a brush, which I suppose makes sense if Patsy did it and didn't want her brush to be recognized as a brush. But on the other hand, putting the broken off part of the brush in with Patsy's art supplies would either be monumentally careless if Patsy did it, or an obvious attempt to plant evidence to link Patsy to the weapon. I don't think Patsy would be dumb enough to break the brush so it doesn't look like a brush anymore, and then just toss the parts that were removed back in with her other items, completely obliterating the whole point of disguising the brush in the first place.
@@sheilasmith7779 You are BABBLING.
"Customer survey" had me chuckling So much in plain sight in this case The most glaring point is that John Ramsey went to the basement. Thanks for covering this You brought clarity to it
When I was in highschool, our forensics teacher had us rewrite the ransom note. If I remember correctly, it took the class between 20-30 minutes- some people did write with their left hand because some of us theorized patsy wrote it with her non dominant hand. You can’t convince me an intruder wasted almost a half hour writing a ransom note on paper that was already in the home.
Exactly. And for whom English is a second language. "Foreign faction" would be precise, to the point. Only American writers (the parents) would ramble using tv, movie references, and sound overly motherly (concerned about wellbeing).
And you guys already knew what it said they'd have to think it up and write in the house.
The DNA evidence is a major outlier though
Forensic Teacher?
Unless it was written by an intruder already in the house who was waiting for them......
So bizzare, a kid is missing, but no one searched the house right away? When I was a kid, my brother disappeared. We found him a few hours later unharmed. But I recall, even as a child, looking EVERYWHERE for him. In every cupboard, behind furniture, under furniture, in the car, even in the bottom of the swimming pool. How could the police and the family sit around in the house for SEVEN HOURS before searching the house. Then the police are asking for a search to happen to see if anything is out of place (not looking for the missing child, just looking to see if there is anything out of place). I think if the parents had anything to do with it, they would most certainly have not asked for the same amount of money as John received for his bonus.
The fact that has made up my mind is the fact that the detective had to tell both John and patsy that 10 am had passed. Parents who knew their daughter was already dead would not realize what time it was but parents that thought their daughter was kidnapped and still alive would have both been glued to the telephone from 9 to 11. Shame on those parents.
They were probably too much in shock.
Same here. Very telling that 10:00 am came and went, with no call from the kidnappers, and the Ramseys had totally forgotten about that part of the ransom note. For me, it is like a smoking gun of sorts.
@@vickijohnson9704 or they killed their kid
I think, IF they weren't involved, they were intelligent enough to discern that the note was a farce, just like everyone else.
That's an excellent point 👏
Oooh. I’m so excited about this one. This case has bothered me for years. Poor girl. Thank you for being the hardest working doctor on RUclips.
Same. I grew up on this case and every year I hope that they find the real killers with new forensic techniques, but as Dr. Grande points out, it’s the Dad!!! Get him now!! Are they still alive?
WHY did the parents lie and say their son, JonBenet's brother, was asleep the entire time they were looking for their daughter. They did not want to bother him to find missing child. Yet as an adult, the brother confesses that he was awake late that night during a commotion about his sister. Uh ohhhh.
The first officer on the scene soon after JonBenet's "kidnapping" was reported said that the ransom note indicated the 8-10am time frame of which to expect a call from the "kidnappers". She went onto say that 10am came and went & there was no mention from either parent that the deadline imposed by the ransom note had come and gone. Enough said!
There is something peculiar about this note that does not seem to have been picked up by anybody. First of all banks are closed on Boxing Day so how could John Ramsey have got his money out. The kidnapper says that bank authorities are not to be alerted so John couldn't have asked the bank to open up especially for him. Unless of course America is different than England and banks are open on Boxing Day!
@@marilynkennedy8236 Yes, you answered your own question.
@@MrS98VAC Thanks for your reply.
The note said "we will call tomorrow". As (ostensibly, at least) no one knows whether the note was composed the previous day or the morning it was found, "Tomorrow" might well have meant the following day - the day after Boxing Day.
@@donnamaree4920 Thank you Donna Maree for your message. I have always understood that tomorrow meant Boxing Day being as the note was supposedly written on Christmas Night, but of course they could well have meant the 27th. A lot of confusion has been caused in my mind because I didn't realise that Boxing Day in America is not considered a Bank Holiday. Therefore I wondered how the kidnappers expected John Ramsey to go to the bank on a bank holiday looking at it from the UK perspective. I have only recently found out that the Banks in America are open on the 26th.
Dr. Todd a very important clue is in the note. In DR. Phill's interview with Burke. Burke used the word (Hence)' On page two of the Ransom note top middle the word (and Hence was used. ) Patsy wrote the note. Burke was raised in a family that would use that word on a normal daily basis for it to be in his vocabulary. A kidnapper would never use a word like that. Burke blew it in the interview. Patsy wrote the note. She spent the entire night trying to save the family from being convicted of the murder. She never went to bed.
it was burke, the parents covered it up
Ive known a bunch of ppl to use the word "hence". Doesn't mean anything.
@@RodrigoFernandez-k2i it means therefore
How many ransom notes have you read that has the word Hence used in them? Burke and Patsy both used the word.
@@giantsofdelawarecounty if they both did, then likely burke learned it from patsy, but patsy still wrote the ransom note, a 9 yr old isnt going to write one, after all, he doesnt want a ransom bc HE is the one who did it
"small foreign faction" No one calls themselves "foreign." That ransom note is a mess.
There are a few international organisations/religious nuts who target wealthy people for money.
@@clairepaterson2374 yes, I'm not saying they aren't foreign, I'm saying no one calls themselves foreign. You are not foreign to yourself. They might have used the word "international." At any rate, the point is moot since it's very clear Patsy wrote that letter.
@@carenann918 I always considered it to be a sign that the maid might have written it.
@@carenann918 There were a lot of contradictions as well. Menacing, and then almost downright friendly.
@@clairepaterson2374 Yes, but they don't call THEMSELVES "foreign".
The whole thing is sick, beyond description
Wouldn’t searching the house be the first thing parents would do and police too??
Not if the note was found immediately.
I’d first be in shock and denial and think maybe it was a prank and check if she’s in bed, then I’d check if Burke is in bed. I’d get Burke up to stay near me. Then I’d wake up my husband and call police. I probably would not have read the letter carefully or even the whole thing until at least my husband was up. I’d probably let him read it while I was calling police if he wasn’t already running around the house himself. I almost forgot that back in those days people used landlines so walking around the house while on the phone wouldn’t be an option. I’d tell the police “I found a ransom note saying someone kidnapped my daughter. I can’t find my daughter. It said not to call the police. What do I do?” I’m the type of person who understands when someone becomes useless for what I need and if I’m just waiting for police to arrive, unless they told me not to, I’d then leave the phone off the hook and frantically run around the house calling out her name with a bat or something so they could hear me scream if someone attacks me (mama bear don’t care about getting hurt when child is in danger) all the while hoping it was a joke so I could come back and say false alarm. My paranoia levels would go through the roof. I’d check if anything seemed out of place or unusual taking mental notes. I would try not to tear up the house destroying any evidence, I’d just run around looking. I’d be highly in tune with whether it felt like I was being watched. I’d look out the windows to check for any parked cars or people walking around. I’d check if any doors or windows were unlocked or open. I wouldn’t call friends over because when something like that happens I don’t trust anyone.
Police did check that morning. Also fleet white searched the house. White even ooened door where she was and couldnt find light swit ch . He didnt see her.
I don’t understand how, even with a ransom note and thinking it’s a kidnapping, that the Ramseys didn’t search every single inch of that house themselves when they realized Jonbenet was missing. If that was my kid I would have torn my entire house apart searching even if I suspected they weren’t there. Especially the hidden away places like where she was found. That never made sense to me why they didn’t bother searching for her in the home very well. Pretty sure Officer Doofy was the lead investigator on this case
As a mom, I would search the house immediately. I'd make my husband and anyone else in the home search too. Police definitely should have searched, systematically when they first got there.
It happened on Christmas Eve in an expensive neighborhood. It wasn’t done by a random stranger who happened to be in the area.
It was actually on christmas day cause the 26th is the date they found her.
You crack me up, while remaining respectful to the victim and making excellent points. Thanks for another great one.
Parents know more than they let on, that's for sure. Poor little sweetheart.
Parents are both conveniently dead. All actors.
Yes, most likely. I watched a program back in 2000 also with a Psychologist, and his input was, based on behavior of the Ramsey's, his opinion was they didn't do it, but they likely knew who did.
@@mztryz The father is not dead.
@@mztryz No. The father is still alive, remarried.
Feel bad laughing during this analysis but you’re commentary on the ransom note was hilarious. But you’re right! It was the kindest and well written ransom note I’ve ever heard of. Great thoughts on this case.
I'm sure the note is fake, but the reasons given are not proof of it being fake by any means. This guy (and nearly everyone in the comments) has obviously never studied the psychological behavior of criminals. Sociopaths and psychopaths in particular USUALLY ARE perfectly calm and collected at the scene of a crime. Guilty people also very commonly try to stage a different crime to throw the cops off, not realizing how ridiculous their fake crime looks. I could go on and on. This whole video is absurd and this guy comes across as remarkably arrogant.
@@Adelicowsthat's what makes him so great. His arrogance although I don't believe he is just comes across that way but he's not.
@@AdelicowsNo he is not arrogant. This sarcastic / ironic tone is his normal . He calls attention to the ridiculous.
Years late to this video but I think we all agree that the moment John went downstairs and found her and moved her was the second this case was absolutely effed in terms of being solved. The second they let slip that the parents were being interviewed as suspects and they stopped cooperating was the final nail in the coffin. I think if they kept interrogating them we would have confessions.
THANK YOU for mentioning the smiling could have been anxiety thing. This is something people often leave out and make assumptions about
Love this: Acknowledging the writer obviously didn’t understand the dynamics of small foreign factions. 🤣. You are a riot!
Yes! Loved that 🤣
He is so good🤣
Exactly. And if you are from another country, you don't consider yourself "foreign"
@@badmamjamma YES!! And you would ALSO consider Americans "foreign".
@@daviddixon2273 exactly! Lol. A murderer/conspirator and not too bright, to boot.
I just discovered dr. Grande and I am fascinated by everything he talks about. Thank u for keeping me sane during this quarantine!😚😍♥️
IKR, he’s a genius
He's the best
Me too. I have NO training in this area whatsoever (I'm a network analyst) but find this very interesting. Dr. Brande does with 'people' what I do with network systems. That's fascinating. In truth. . . his work is more interesting :-) For what I know (which isn't much) the note is way over the top for someone in a hurry and I feel strongly it was written by a women.
Welcome to our little group:-) he is the best I never miss an episode
@@ladymopar2024 thank u. What a friendly place to be
Great video! I just recently started learning about the facts of this case. I majored in criminal justice and I never actually got a job in my field and I feel like I'm waisting my detective mind. haha. The one thing that really stood out to me, was literally five minutes before I watched your video, I watched a video where John Ramsey made a comment about how he did not watch movies and him and Patsy rarely watched movies. I thought the comment was extremely odd and out of place in the interview. There was no reference to watching movies and he basically just added the comment in the interview which I found bizarre. It was bothering me why he made that comment and then I came across your video. The fact that the ransom note contained movie references is crazy. I feel someone in that house has the answers and it's a shame that probably no one will find out what happened.
Why would you call police and all those friends to come when the ransom note implied they would kill her if you did?? Makes it hard to believe an intruder wrote that note.
You'd just be preparing to pay that ransom quietly is what I'm saying.
@Fly by night I totally agree. No real kidnapper/murderer would take the time to sit down and write a "ransom note" using the family notepad. Risking a family member waking up when they heard a disturbance in the house in the middle of the night. That "ransom note" sealed it for me in my mind that it was a family member. JonBenet was already dead. They were instituting a coverup and sadly it worked. In my opinion. Allegedly. Don't come for me Ramseys. Think Madeleine McCann case.
@Tina Thompson I have always thought that their close couple-friends, that were also the Ramsey's neighbors, were somehow involved. I can't recall if law enforcement took samples of their DNA or not, but they should have. John and the neighbor guy went down in the basement together when they asked Jon and Patsy to check the entire house.
It is the note that makes it clear the Ramseys were involved. IF they didn't write it they would have been pouring over every detail in it before the cops arrived. They would have eyes glued to the phone waiting for a ransom call. They would not have called anyone but the police. The way they disregarded the notes instructions and the threat of some foreign faction makes it clear they are not afraid of any kidnapper involvement.
Fly by night... to me it seems quite obvious that it was NOT Patsy Ramsey. Number one: why would she use her own pad of paper and her own paintbrush? Doesn't that seem just a little too "convenient "? Also… I'm no expert whatsoever, but I can tell male handwriting from female handwriting most of the time. (I was a psychology student once upon a time)!The letters used in that note are clearly male. Now...I have done some thing in my lifetime that was designed to throw people off. I'm right handed. But out of silliness or whatever, I've used my left hand and I purposely did not use the same structure or loops in my letters. I also changed my typical sentence structure and purposely misspelled some words. It ends up not looking like my writing.
Notice that the ransom notes begins with the words: "Mr. Ramsey ... but ends with the words: "it's up to you now John." That's a very PERSONAL comment. The writer knows the family intimately.
I think you're on the right track but I've long had a bit of a theory of my own on the murder which fits exactly with yours. The $119,000 ransom which as said is the exact number of John's bonus. Very few would have knowledge of that number; those in the family/friends circle, those at John's bank where he deposited that bonus and those that worked closely with John at his job. That said, I don't think the motive ever was the bonus money but that Jonbenet was always the target ... maybe not for kidnapping though. Lets say a co-worker of John's who is either below him on the corporate ladder or younger than him ends up with a "fascination" over JonBenet that only a sick mind could have. Lets say that man broke into the house in either stalker/voyeur mode or a much more sinister. If she caught him or tried drawing attention maybe it was then and there that he decided to take her with him and figured a fake ransom note would be a way of throwing people off giving him a chance to get way with her. Maybe the mistake he made which would create a link would be the $119,000 number. It limits suspects to those who knew the exact amount of John's bonus. My guess would be that he initially planned to get away through the basement when he heard someone come home but Jonbenet probably tried drawing attention and he killed her to keep her quiet and stayed in that closet/room until after everyone went to sleep or left.
Considering John was the President and CEO of a Lockheed Martin subsidiary he''d have plenty of subordinates and quite a few of them would be younger which would explain the "Mr. Ramsey" written on the ransom note. This is just my theory, but you're 100% right ... I think this whole thing was personal.
@@RedDawnRocker the killer lived in the house
@@arribaficationwineho32 Maybe, but zero evidence to prove that.
@@ronleon62 thanks to the family controlling the investigation by police without a lot of murder experience
Yeppers, they owed big money. Not her Brother? She was #$&*¶€ You know, lotta money
Who doesn’t look the house over, top to bottom, when they discover their child is missing from their bed? I would’ve turned my house upside down and continued to do so....
true, it's an obvious and instinctive behaviour...it looks like they knew already where the body was, I mean the body and not the child...
@@Alfakkin they knew exactly what happened
Texas Gigi , I would have too!! I would have gotten everyone up and had everyone including Burke , to be looking for my child..
First of all, this isn't about you. You have no idea how you would react in that situation.
And, JonBenet wasn't just 'missing', the note said she was kidnapped. John & Patsy quickly checked her room and Burke's room. Patsy then IMMEDIATELY called 911. Nothing wrong with that! You do know the Ramsey home was huge, over 7,000 s/f and 4 floors, right? Just to put that into perspective, there were 8 bathrooms alone in their home.
DNA from an unknown male left on JonBenet's body eliminated the Ramseys as suspects over a decade ago. Boulder Police Dept. has cleared them, and they continue to search for the perp, as it is an open and ongoing investigation.
All scientific evidence points to an intruder and away from the Ramseys. You can't change science. Science doesn't lie, but trolls on YT certainly do.
DARK HORSE , a natural reaction is to check your home, no matter how many floors there are.. here’s the kicker, they didn’t get any money! Nor was there a call from the kidnapper. And just bc the Ramsey’s were cleared doesn’t mean they weren’t involved.. yeah they checked her room , ... I do know how I would react .. bc my children mean everything to me and I wouldn’t stop looking to make sure all unturned stone s have looked at.. I know I wouldn’t just wait! When she was in the house that night.. ppl who don’t have children wouldn’t know how they would react.. that Ransom letter , 3 pages was to throw off suspension.. no kidnapper , will right a letter, and be all formal about it.. they would get to the point and the point is about money.. which they didn’t receive.. your right This isn’t about me it’s about JonBent and she deserves justice.. the killer needs held accountable.. and I happen to care, about her and other children .. she didn’t deserve this, and it’s funny that the killer quickly knew what room she was in , since the house was 4 levels... there’s new technology out every yr , so it’s about time for a fresh look at this case and should be looked at from scratch!!!!
The note was likely a failed attempt to remove the body from the home in a large suitcase, completing the cover up as a kidnapping. The $118k was exactly John's bonus amount and what the Ramseys knew was in their account so they wouldn't have delays waiting on transfers from other accounts and assets. The part about making sure John was rested first because the day would be tiring makes perfect sense if it was written by an exhausted person who'd had a long day of holiday celebrations and then was up all night because their child died in their home and they had to figure out how to cover it up. Someone desperate to get a little sleep and dreading the inevitable events of the next day which would be further exhausting.
Very good point.
Patsy 100% wrote that ridiculous ransom note. Like a random intruder would just happen to have handwriting so perfectly similar to hers. It's so blisteringly obvious that I don't even see how this is a "mystery" outside the courts (where the proof standards are beyond reasonable doubt). Don't know which parent actually took her life, but they both knew who killed her, and John being still alive knows to this day.
And still milking that story for all it's worth.
ExACTLY I have always thought it was the mother,
Ben Robinson, You better believe Patsy wrote that RN. Identical handwriting.
@@freddie3206but patsy taught her so. how to write
What if she was forced to write the ransom note? What if it was a Mob thing?
The note refers to the "body" of the little girl rather than saying she will be returned unharmed. That is a bizarre way to ask for a ransom.
She was already dead at the time this note was written.
@@egomod this is a good one!
Why is your username "Clarabelle's Place"?
Yes, but the note as a whole is a ruse to cause confusion
@@egomod
Clarabelle's statement is not true. It's a false statement.
I agree.
The fact that her body wasn't found before it was is the craziest part, I would have torn my house apart. Police didn't search well enough for certain, why? They were out of their depth? Too concerned with offending the Wealthy Ramseys?
No one can say anything based on that. They thought anything, except that the girl would be dead in the basement when it was a circumstance in which they thought they were dealing with a possible kidnapping. The basement was probably out of her reach so that she or her brother wouldn't go in there unsupervised. It's even more complicated because in JonBenet's pajamas unknown DNA was found and not compatible with anyone in the house.
Well because they thought it was a kidnapping
We had a murder/ suicide next door to us in FL. The police never even went around the outside of the house. Where the body was. Helicopters called, dogs, massive 2 hour search...wasting tons of taxpayer $. Pls do the obvious first!
@@mariec.albuquerque6446It is well known that it could be touch DNA from a factory worker who handled her clothing. I mean it was touch DNA. That can be from anyone who has ever been in contact with an item or article.
Can DNA be transferred purposely by one of the family members by being out somewhere and maybe have gloves on and intentionally take a napkin or something and place it where someone else could get their DNA on it and then one of the family members take that napkin and transfer the DNA to JonBenet's body to throw investigators off with the idea of a intruder?
It's like the police in that town don't know how to police. Getting civilians to do the house search, not questioning people with any sort of method. Tragically ridiculous.
It would be interesting to hear your take on the case of Madeleine McCann
Your videos are brilliant and I’m always looking forward to the next one
Yes, definitely.
Be careful talking about Madeleine the parents take legal action if you look at them funny
Yes!
Yes! Now there's a baffling case!
@@chibbledorf They also sue any who mentions that they sue so you are now in big trouble... and so am I now, oh pooh!
In Patsys 911 call she says “we have a kidnapping!” The language she uses throughout the call is similar to what’s written in the note like “we have your daughter” it’s more like she’s reporting on the case like she’s not emotionally connected to her daughter. A sign of guilt.
Thank you!! Absolutely agree.... Patsy’s 911 call is weird!! She even says “Thanks” to the dispatcher at the end of the call!🙄
Yes. She used what's called "distancing language."
@@ohdear2275 Where did you find this information? On how someone who is stressed out and in shock would act? I would want to distance myself from it too. When you call police - 9-1-1, most highly intelligent people get to the point quickly. Autism also probably runs in this family. Very high functioning - just bc people don't behave like YOU doesn't mean they murdered their kid.
@@elainevankat5353 That is what people say to police officers and dispatchers. They thank them.
The commentator said there was no motive. It could have been an accident, kids get on parents nerves and parents overreact. Only God knows what happened. Poor police work. Not sure it would have mattered though. He would have had good lawyers.
It's apparent to me that the local police were intimidated by the Ramsey's social status and hesitated to perform a serious investigation at the start.
The Boulder PD were a Community Watch Policing system and the investigators on this case had no experience investigating homicides. The lead investigator was a Bunko Cop, not a Homicide investigator. They were not intimidated by John Ramsey. He had no political status within Boulder. They had only lived in Colorado for 3 years. The issues were political between the Chief of police and the Boulder DA. The Govenor and 5 other County DA's were also involved. There were 3 world renowned pathologists/Medical examinors/Coroners examined Jonbenet's case. They agreed, the evidence was such a mess, they could not make Heads or tails of what happened. The Boulder PD came up with their theory of what they believed happened and tried to make the evidence fit their theory rather than the other way around. The evidence is supposed to tell the story. This is why the Grand Jury could not make a case to indite anyone.
We citizens of Colorado were kept updated on this case annually until the Boulder DA announced the Ramsey's were cleared of this murder a few years ago, after Patsy's death.
This report is from a "Johnny come lately
Punishment is for poor people. Cops have always existed for the protection of the wealthy, so it shouldn’t be surprising when the rich get away with murder.
Yeah in general Social status does confuse the behaviour of the police towards suspects.
Professionals tend to be held in high esteem.
However I am totally horrified by this Psychological situation that we know so much.
It’s so weird seeing this old format! I definitely prefer the current set up! Cacti! 🎉
One thing that stands out in this case was that after the expected call from “the kidnapper” didn’t come, the parents didn’t mention it.
Suspicious, right? Wouldn't you think they would become tense if they kidnapper did not call? I bet they were so worried about what was going to happen to them that they lost track of time.
Right? After one minute late, I'd be freaking out saying "why aren't they calling! Somethings wrong!"
I agree, that it essentially unbelievable under any circumstances.. You would be livid and scared out of your mind at what that meant that they did not call. All of your hopes would have been riding on that phone call in the desperate hope that you'd hear her voice.
@@ogpigeon4431 They were probably also very worried that they did not know how they were going to explain why there was no call. It was probably a relief for John Ramsey when the officer told him and his friend to search the home because they no longer had to hold onto a kidnapping story that was becoming less believable with more time.
I was bothered by how nonchalant John Ramsey acted when the time came for the phone call. You’d think John and Patsy would be very eager or nervous to answer the phone but they weren’t. John was looking at his mail casually like a normal day . Bizarre
Plus, John still planned on traveling to Atlanta even after finding out his daughter was just brutally murdered! I mean, if my kid was just murdered I have to believe I’d cancel all flights and stay home to just either help the police or maintain peace of mind
I love how you call him Phil McGraw instead of Dr. Phil. Dr. Grande is the QUEEN of throwing subtle shade. We stan a deadpan legend.
Dont misgender my friend Dr.Grande thank you.
Yeah. What’s your deal?
😂😂😂OMG didn't pick up on that! PhD in Shade 🔥😎🔥
Phil McGraw does hold a PhD from a legitimate University, so, while you might disagree with his "practices" he is still... Dr. Phil.
@harry pag You can't *give up* your PhD. Do you even know what a PhD is? lol I agree that he's similar to Jerry Springer, but he's Jerry Springer with a doctorate. He might not be licensed to practice clinical psychology, but he has a PhD, so it's perfectly legitimate for him to go by Dr.
One has to question the mental/emotional stability of any parent that puts their young child in the world of beauty pageants.
Understand this Patsy was a born bred West Virginian. They are raised very different and I am not trying to be mean just the psychology of some people in her area of this country! Out of Love ( in her mind) was jbr doing these pageants as she did and she loved it didn't look it at it like warped sexual idea!
@@rachelcoloradomy3kidz778 I agree with what you're saying, and I won't judge someone's heart in the matter, but I still feel that making a 5 yr old up like an adult hooker and parading her around on a stage in scanty clothing is problematic on its face and I do question the thinking of ppl who participate in such things.
The beauty pageant stuff was a distractor that kept the police from properly doing their job.
I don't agree with child beauty pageants but in the south they are extremely common so I wouldn't say every parent whose kids do pageants are evil
@Cuck ButtFurd Bingo! And there is your motive!
The girl didn't want to do that anymore, it is no fun for a child at all. So this "ungrateful b1tch" who didn't "appreciate" what her "dear mother" had done "for her" was probably beaten by the mother who saw her dream crumble.
Maybe it was better for the girl to get out that night. Growing up with a mother like that is not healthy and won't lead to a normal life. Ask me how I know that. No, rather don't.
Reading and seeing a number of takes on this fascinating case over the years, I was interested in hearing what you had to say. In my opinion, the best analysis I've seen has been from former head of the FBI Profiling unit, John E. Douglas, in his book The Cases That Haunt Us. He seems to give more credence than you to the exculpatory factors regarding the parents, but your thoughts are otherwise pretty interesting.
To your point about the police making a mistake pushing the Ramseys into getting legal representation early, I think there is no shortage of mistakes the Boulder Police made, including not controlling the crime scene (admitting visitors, sending John and friend to search the house), solely focusing on the Ramseys as suspects initially, misinterpretation of evidence, etc. The lack of a united front in the department has also led to a lot of mostly-misinformed hounding of this family by "hobbyists."
Dr. Grande your humor cracks me up and the fact that you barely crack a smile makes it even more humorous!
Also, I found this in a book on the case: When you find a ransom note, you should not find a dead body. When you find a dead body, you should not find a ransom note, it's just stupid.
Exactly, ridiculous
Right? You wouldn’t find both a ransom note AND a body together.
Maybe they weren’t anticipating actually having to pretend to discover the body maybe they thought that the cops would come talk to them and then not stay at their house so they could hide the body somewhere else but when they realize that the cop was going to stay there he pretended to find her
Charles Lindbergh: "Hold my beer."
@@mulemule I was thinking that too, and was going to look it up to make sure,,, thought i would read down to see if somebody else said that,,, I will buy you a beer for that one
Dr. Grande is cracking me up when he's talking about the details of the ransome note. Hahaha... (customer service survey, etc.)
I'm crying. Dr. Grande slings out his sarcasm with such a straight face. LMAO
@@Khymeira I know he makes Bob Newhart seem like Jim Carrie he's he so dry lol. I love it. 😂
I know I told him that the other day. He has a dry sense of humor. He will be talking about the case all of a sudden he will sa something out of left field. I don't know i ever body catches that.
I know lol, he’s so straight faced while being a total smart ass! Hilarious
CarbonQuellist I know. That survey was a good dead pan face. Yesterday he got me with Prince Andrew and the chickens. Pmsl
I love Dr. Grande´s sarcasm: "It´s like the kidnappers saying to the parents: ´Brush your teeth before you leave the house´, ´Rate from 1 to 5. How much did you like the kidnapping?" 😆
That was hysterical!
@@mushmouth1873 Slow down Captain Justice.
Yeah... I can't appreciate his "sarcasm" .... And I generally like sarcasm. Maybe it's the circumstances involved , a small child's murder probably not a topic to implement sarcasm . He seems more satirical in his discourse to me
i know its great, partly why i keep coming back. just waiting for the jokes to drop
IKR?
A letter that begins with "LISTEN carefully". Priceless.
I always felt that the letter had the feel, that it was written from a woman's point of view.
@@danoconnor3720 I immediately thought the letter was written by a woman. Or a homosexual man. The wording is very similar to a cheap romance novel.
"This is The Zodiac speaking"...same.
I didn't even catch that!😂👍 good one
This has always bothered me. Who starts a written letter with *"Listen carefully"*? Also, what idiot demands the exact amount of John's bonus amount?
Other weird evidence: she was eating pineapple in a bowl when she died. The "intruder", in his haste, would have had to have stopped the kidnapping, made her a snack, hung out in the kitchen while she ate it, and then got back to business. There is zero chance somebody from outside of that house did this. There's also no way the Ramsey's planned the killing to go down that way. It was probably an accident and subsequent cover-up.
@Orion way more evidence the mom did it, imo. Bed wetting, physical evidence, the pineapple thing, the shoddy cover- up, the fact she didn't immediately call the police. If Burke did it, her immediate reaction would have been saving her daughter's life, not fearing legsl trouble for a 6 year old, or whatever he was, imo.
@Orion A 9 yo would likely break [at some point]during the many police interrogations.
If it WAS an accidental death, why ... tell the world it was something else. Also, if it WAS an accident, the kid wouldn't be found garroted in a spare room adjacent to their basement, with a smashed-up skull. Also, would an "accident" really leave traces of semen on the victim!? It couldn't possibly have been an accident. I've always wavered between thinking Patsy was guilty or not. I just know loving parents are not going to damage the body of their child!!
@Orion ur an idiot a he didnt write this whole damn note
Agreed
The brother acted very strange on doctor phil, I have a feeling Ramsay’s brother killed her and the parents covered it up because they were scared of not just losing their daughter but also their son to the jail system.
This is a case which definitely has many problematic matters, and was one that saw me become interested in forensic issues. Thank you for dealing with this crime and the various individuals involved and especially for your deadpan humour analysing this case! I happen to think Patsy wrote that 'ransom note' and that the killer(s) were in the family.
Kybele Kordax I agree.
yup. the ransom note is what seals the deal for me that the killer was within the family also. Too Hinky!
A and the specific amount of money they were asking for too,same as the fathers Christmas bonus.
I agree. James Kolar's book does a brilliant job in debunking the intruder theory. Also, if you look at the kind of person Patsy was, it makes sense that she would cover for Burke rather than risk losing him. It would have been a black mark on the family's reputation, and Patsy was very into the image of the 'perfect' family.
@@Ac2091-x1f The problem with using a specific amount the same as the bonus is this. Would you write a note like that to hide a crime you've committed and use a specific amount in such a way that could point to you as the perpetrator? Doesn't make sense to me at all. Unless Patsy was especially dimwitted.
The parents' first reaction was to leave the state and lawyer up. That is not a normal reaction for a family that has just lost a child. That was the first giveaway for me. Then the paper being in the house. Then the exact amount of his bonus being mentioned in it.
Well if I find my baby girl dead in a cold basement floor I moving out .. have an open mind.. Google facts of the case instead of countless comments that it was Burke an a crazy all night cover up
I'm a cat owner and I look for him everywhere as soon as I notice he's not around. Imagine a child.
EXACTLY... just 2 nights ago our cat didn't wake my husband up at 2am like he always does... so there's my husband walking up and down the street in his slippers and gown, looking for our baby boy. That's why I married him. Too precious!
Lais,
There are other ways to hint that you are single. Also if a note read “we have your precious Jinksey cat and demand a ransom” would you assume the cat was still in the house
@@jamesr1703 it was definitely the dad lol
NEXT TIME... Go look in your neighbors yard/garden... He'll be using it as a TOILET!!
Same with my dog 🐕 ❤️
To adress the sexual assault: We have to be accurate here. She was penetrated by a part of a wooden paintbrush but she was not raped. Points more to a person she trusted and she was familiar with. Moreover after her death her intimate area was wiped, a duct tape was put over her mouth, she was wrapped in her favorite blanket that was stored in a room far from the room where her body was found. Points to someone who cared about her. The big picture is unambiguous. She was probably accidentally killed in the heat of the moment and then the parents staged her body & the crime scene to cover it up to protect their reputation/social status and to protect their sole stream of income - John´s job.
9:10 “rate 1 to 5, how did you like this kidnapping?” That really had me laughing! Your sense of humor is brilliant!
I’m gonna give it a 2/5, because it’s an intriguing mystery, but I’m disappointed in the fact that was no arrest.
Well my goodness...
Omg I was laughing so hard 😂
Yeah, and 'take a big enough attaché with you to the bank.' What a bizarre instruction for a 'small foreign faction' to make. As if they would care about anything but getting the money. What a joke.
Sounds like the psychological mindset of an businessman, one who is used to doing customer service. Maybe even someone that is "Entrepreneur of the Year" with his new secretary writing the note for them.
If my kid was missing, I would have searched every room, closet or space that she could possibly be. Seems like hours passed while she was in the basement. 🤷♀️
7 hours apparently... an incompetent investigation team is to thank for that😪 I wish for justice for that poor little girl
@@Rachel-467 the fact that they let the crime scene be disturbed and having the dad and a friend searching the house, just a pathetic excuse of an investigation.
@Jenny Jay. JonBenet was just 'missing'. JonBenet's parents woke up, there was a ransom note left saying she was kidnapped. They quickly checked her room and Burke's and immediately called 911. Nothing wrong with that! Boulder police were there within minutes, and searched the home. The Ramsey home was huge, over 7,000 s/f.
@@darkhorse9472 the police didn’t find her, her dad and Fleet found her... so the police didn’t search very well either.... I’m not trying to be mean, I understand that you don’t know what you would do in a situation like this, it just seems like a lot of things went very wrong with the investigation. ☮️
@@jennyjay7816
Fleet and JR found JonBenet, because the Boulder Police Dept. had no experience with a kidnapping, and refused help from the FBI. When the Ramseys called 911, they trusted the police to do their job...and yes, a thorough search, but we know how that went. The door where JonBenet was, on the other side, was not opened by BP, because it was locked from the outside. They were searching for an exit by the kidnappers, and for clues and evidence of a kidnapping...not her body.
The Ramsey home was massive, with 8 bathrooms alone. The bathroom in the basement had evidence of an intruder.
John Ramsey knows exactly what happened. I just hope that before he passes away he has a change of heart and decides to tell what really happened.
Susan, you have no idea what you’re talking about.
@@kieransoregaard-utt8 well thank god Brandon was here to set the record straight! 🤣🤣🤣.
Me too. I suspect it was an accident but they were too scared of what would happen to so and so... the 911 call there’s a person saying “I’m sorry I’m sorry” in the background... logically that would be John...
@@sjworrier0613 Wrong. Way off.
@@sjworrier0613 Another "family affair" much like Brian Laundrie and his parents. They all cover for each other and try to trick the cops into looking in the wrong direction. Perhaps the long note was simply an attempt to do that. The cops were negligent and sloppy in both cases. A lot of people, like me, were quite suspicious of Jon Benet's brother right from the start because of jealousy due to all the attention paid to his sister.
Thanks!
Well, i dont like how far those childerns beauty pageants go with exploiting these girls...often, i think there should be an 'evaluation' on some of the parents who push it as a lifestyle.
Nothing to do with the murder. Totally off topic.
@@LaniAnne402 yes. And random pedos don't hang out at beauty pageants. There's not even an audience to speak of, it's just all the kids' pageant moms. In fact if a person was there who didn't have a child in the competition they would immediately stick out.
The HUGE thing was If your child is "Missing" why wouldnt you search the house.
If they found the ransom note right away I guess it wouldn't make much sense to search the house. At least not for the girl.. but for evidence sure. Nobody would think the kid is still in the house after they found a ransom note stating that it got kidnapped.
If they weren't rich they would have been prosecuted relatively quickly. Poor parents would have been nailed for it.
@@quasimobius I'm not from the U.S. so I can't really comment on that. But I'm on the same page as Dr. Grande. It seems
likely they are guilty in some way
@@Capiiable I believe Jonbenet becoming school age factored into her being killed. They, the schools tell the kids they don't have to take abuse from anyone and to come forward and tell. I think the dad was playing sex games on the child and when she thought she saw a light at the end of the tunnel, she came out and actually told her abuser she didn't have to take it anymore and she was going to tell, and that provoked an extreme reaction.
It was a crime of passion.
quasimobius wow, next tell us the day and time at which Jesus will return for his flock. Such prophet.
Writing a 2 page (!) ransom note, feels like something very personal ,the exact amount of ransom money and the concern processing the ransom money....i believe it was someone in the family
No one committing such a crime would delay leaving the scene of the crime to leisurely write a long, drawn out ransom note on the homeowners notepad. Ridiculous.
@@annahale1187 good point, maybe they wrote it beforehand?
@@tj-ln2ep how? it was from patsys notebook
Perhaps.? But ....the Motive..??
Even Dr Grande can't come up with
one. Also , at one point he mentions DNA...from a non family
member but never refers to it again..??
I agree. Demanding the exact amount of the bonus is very telling. I do not recall whether it had been stated that the amount of John's bonus had been perhaps printed in the newspaper or announced on a news story?
Dr Grande. Excellent presentation.
I don’t feel right about laughing during the breakdown of this case, but your comments about the letter made me. If only everyone in the world had your sensible point of view.
He went directly to her because he didn't want people LOOKING THROUGH HIS HOUSE!
And there’s probably some truth to that
he went directly 2 her bc he knew x-actly were she was !
@@michaeldelguercio339
Do you have evidence John Ramsey 'went directly 2 her bc he knew x-actly were she was !'? Didn't think so. There is no evidence to support your statement.
@@darkhorse9472 grow a brain like John , just by the fact thats the 1st place he went tells you he knew.....stupid!
@@michaeldelguercio339
Me stupid? DNA cleared the Ramseys over a decade ago. You DO know what DNA is, right?
Your analysis of this crime was fascinating. I have been a criminal defense lawyer for some 25 years and am a mother of a son and daughter. I followed this murder closely as it happened. I watched the coverage, read as much information about he case as possible, and watched the interviews of the family. I agree with most everything you said and especially agree that Patsy wrote the note. Here are my thoughts and theroies:
The killer was one of the three people in the house. I don't see Patsy as the killer. But I do see Patsy writing the note. Patsy's motive for writing the note obviously was to protect the killer and Patsy had to have known who killed JonBenet. After all, only two other people were in the house.
You said that you thought John was the mostly likely candidate to be the killer. And Bert, the least likely. That analysis makes sense except for one thing. I cannot imagine any mother -- and Patsy seemed like a reasonably stable mother who loved her daughter -- who would protect her husband whom she knew had killed her daughter. The only person Patsy would cover for is her son, her only remaining child. He may have been able to give good interviews but it just does not make sense to me that Patsy would allow the killer of her daughter to get away with it if it were her husband. Real motherly love does not do that.
This is only my opinion and of course is not based on any first hand knowledge. So, having said that: Thank you for your analyses. I love hearing what you have to say about the various criminals' mental states.
Yes! Totally agree with your well-reasoned speculation. She wouldn’t cover up the murder unless it was committed by her own son...almost the way Casey Anthony’s parents *know* she killed her daughter but still protected her.
@@mgal6234 Exactly! All evidence points to Burke.
Yes. He had a history of violence with his sister.
Liz Arnott didn't know that.
How about a christmas sacrifice in the name of jesus
Another wonderful video. Thank you Dr. Grande.
“Foreign”. Yessir if I am over in England I would refer to myself in a ransom note “a small FOREIGN faction.” Who calls themselves a foreign or foreigner ??
Exactly!
Note writer could have been trying to cast blame on Al Queda or IS.
A young punk in his 20's who plays too many video games, that's who.
@@darkhorse9472 Do you think that young punk have the vocabulary used in the letter? Sounds like an older person, but there are always exceptions!
@@lorib360 some young punks are smarter than they appear, and twisted.
The letter does sound like a woman wrote it almost like she was trying to write a crime novel
Yea it does
I always thought Patsy wrote the note. When I read it I can hear her voice in my head. Especially the listen carefully!
I agree
@Gary Etheridge
DNA eliminated the Ramseys over a decade ago.
If they thought their older son did it, they may have been protecting him.
Dr Grande is brilliant at boiling a case right down to its essentials, very dry and forensic. Stephanie Harlowe also did an excellent analysis, in which she examined the background of Patsy and John, giving an insight into the personalities involved. Actions which seem, prima facie, outre and bizarre, have a crazy sort of rationale once you understand the outre and bizarre people who enact them!
I don’t remember Stephanie doing this case, I’ll have to go watch it again.
I can't believe they don't use backtrack DNA to build a profile. That, and an incredibly verbose ransom note. Who's verbose? Who's verbose and powerful? Handwritten? They're practically handing it to you on a platter.
When you watch the ReeTV series on this, you’ll realise that all these other true crime channel just repeat the official agreed upon story and aren’t interested in getting to the truth!!!
EXACTLY! Does anyone have a "motive" to kill a child? Perhaps all killers have one in mind, but it is not necessarily apparent to others. Someone in that house lost it and hit a little girl, killing her. Then, someone staged a coverup. Patsy was "Mrs. Perfect". She would never have allowed her son to have been known as the one who killed her daughter, even if it was an accident. She absolutely wrote that B movie ransom letter. It is a shame that there was no justice.
Brilliant analysis, Dr G. Thank you.
It’s always one set of rules for the wealthy and another for everyone else.
The police botched the case by not securing the house.
@@jaysonb.6669 Prove it. Give us the photo!
Amen to that.
Amen, Sister Sandra! You said it all in bottom one line: Money will bail you out of jail for a lifetime when you kill your kid or steal from every client who did business with scumbag murderous Dad.
Amen Sandra!! 👍
I love your analysis of the “small foreign faction.” Your delivery made me laugh.
His dead face is 10/10 when he delivers but omg shit is on point.
"A SMALL foreign faction would not want to draw attention to the fact that it is in fact not LARGE" 😂
Dont ignore the sons age. 2 10 yr old boys, kidnapped a toddler from a shopping mall, molested, repeatedly struck him with rocks, killed him and tied him to train tracks in the UK. Kids dont need a motive and are very capable of evil.
@Nelson Robert Willis Robbie Thompson?? Robbie?? In the UK he was always referred to as Robert not Robbie..
@Nelson Robert Willis oh and it's "Jon" too... I'm from Liverpool and it's the most tragic thing to ever happen in my city...
The ransom note is VERY suspicious! I believe the father, mother and the brother are involved.
But the handwriting is not Patsy's. DNA on the body was not Patsy's or John's. Therefore there must be another collaborator.
@@ru.kiddingme it was Patsy writing with her non dominant hand. There were videos where she denied writing things she obviously did, in similar handwriting.
Thanks Dr G, very well analyzed.
This case makes me happy my country has banned children's beauty pageants. The amount of suspects they had that were oddly fond of JonBenet is terrifying. The suspect list would've been so much smaller had she just been a normal little girl instead of a famous child beauty queen.
My ears perked up when he said Patsy was frustrated with bedwetting, because that's an indicator of sexual abuse.
Now here's blatant speculation: It sounds like a _motive_ if JonBenet told her mom. Maybe she was complicit and worried JonBenet would tell someone else, maybe she wasn't and saw it, not as horrific child abuse but, as JonBenet being preferred over her, and she could get her husband firmly back under her control by a) taking away the little girl he wanted more than her, and b) holding the abuse over his head to control him. Just spitballing here but there have been and are a scary amount of cases where moms were complicit in the abuse, married their husbands on the condition that he could abuse their daughters, or killed their daughters _because_ they were being molested _specifically_ to remove competition.
@@THEFRISKIESTDINGO I agree with the point about bedwetting. Admittedly the probability of sexual abuse given bedwetting is still low (lots of children wet the bed at that age) so it's not exactly a smoking gun, the probability of bed wetting given sexual abuse at that age is pretty high so it is certainly consistent with that.
Three cheers for the law in your country concerning child beauty pageants
P.s. to the last 2 comments. Sometimes the bedwetting Theory feels like a bit of a decoy. Realistically, the vaginal damage could be due to the bedwetting..
Perhaps getting stuck on one theory could be the reason why this case has never been solved
What about dance competitions? I was utterly shocked by shows such as Dance Moms, with kids in skimpy, revealing costumes, plastered with stage makeup, often with wigs, hairpieces and bleached hair, performing skills that included them opening their legs, gyrating, etc. I can just picture these competitions being an absolute magnet for all kinds of predators.
@@sapphire22011 I agree. It feels like free invitation for unwanted guests
“Make sure you’re well rested” & eat breakfast bc it’s the most important meal of the day.
@Nana Li: Yeah, that comment always bothered me, too. Who has ever heard of conscientious kidnapper?
And wear your mittens kittens, it's cold outside.
Sounds like something a mother says
@@audreyquinn73 Yeah, it was about 3am and "He" was All Concerned about their morning,
not
take her or actually have a chance to get the money
and wear clean underwear
Police negligence. Just terrible police work. The local cops had no experience in cases like this. Very unfortunate that her killer was never brought to justice.
I agree!!!
I really want this crime solved in my lifetime!! First-Who’s dna was found on JonBenet??
Her "killer" was Mommie Dearest.
@@vampireslayer1989 I thought it might have been her brother? He flipped into a rage after JonBenet took some of his pineapple and milk, perhaps? I thought I'd heard this. He then lashed out (he had a temper, apparently, right?), she falls/was pushed, and fatally lands/bangs her head, or whatever. I dunno...!
Jennifer Jensen : Nobody searches the house until 7 hours later?
@@5amH45lam Straight from a TV show plot. Shame Detective Columbo wasn't about at the time.
I'm 100% convinced that Burke did it, and the parents covered it up and may have been the ones to finish the job.
Such a tragic case. But I nearly lost it when you said, “How would you rate this kidnapping experience?” Shows how ridiculous the situation was and how very likely the parents did it.
When my son was about 7 I thought he was at home but I couldn’t find him. I looked thru the entire house and outside, every nook & cranny, deep into closets, cabinets etc. Turned out his dad took him somewhere or something- didn’t tell me. The point is when a child is missing, I think most parents would do what I did. No stone unturned.
That would be me when mine were young. Even when they were teens I made it a point to know their whereabouts.
Did your husband leave a ransom note?
But if you found a ransom note, would you have kept searching your house, or called the police?
@@davidroddick91 great point, police straight away ask questions later
@@kdburner7356 was there ever lie detective test taken to rule the parents out.?
In my experience, long notes are written for scams or to lie. Whenever I post something for sale a car, bicycle scammers send me offers at full price with the story that they cannot pick up the item and the long reason why. How does this relate? because whoever wrote the note, guilty of the action, feels its necessary to convince the seriousness of the note.
I think it was someone the Ramseys knew who wanted to frame them and get his rocks off at the same time.
AMEN! Legitimate is always short and 'sweet'!
That's very true. I remember hearing a psychologist saying that people who are lying tend to be excessively detailed whereas true statements are generally quite concise.
@@marian6593 So let me get this straight.. the person who breaks in and steals children, rapes them and then kills them is a person who is not only logical, but of sound mind. got it.
Some people are just wordy. The ransom note wording was stilted and did not sound legitimate.
Nice analysis on the letter brought up interesting points
"Good Customer Experience & Survey" hilarious along with " don't forget to ... , brush your teeth & wear your seatbelt." Lovee Dr. G's logical humor!! Love his brief, concise summaries & analysis of these cases! PLEASE do JESSICA CHAMBERS MURDER!!!
Just like it is, John Ramsey went 8 hours later, very suspicious, straight down to the basement, any normal parent would immediately search whole house first, without anyone needing to tell them
Yes He had to find the body first so he could contaminate the scene with his Dna since his was already there so It was urgent he find it first even if it looked suspicious
Not when the first thing you see it the ransome note on the stairs as you come downstairs.
The police botched this! How unprofessional is a police department that doesn’t work on Christmas? So many questions could have been answered if they had done their job.
@@SJ-ni6iy And now I doubt we’ll ever know.
@Elize Le Roux. JonBenet wasn't LOST...the note said she was KIDNAPPED. Get it? Patsy immediately call 911, and police were there in minutes, and began to search for clues, they didn't search for HER. What is wrong with you?
Your take on the ransom note is insightful and humorous, Patsy wrote it. RIP little angel.
Yes, Patsy wrote it. I agree
Nope. I trust the FBI profilers. The Ramsey's have been cleared.
@@ohdear2275 I agree patsy wrote it!!
A woman didn't write it. Much of the language used is directly from popular action movies around 1996. "It's up to you now!" is from Crimson Tide. There are several lines taken from Mission Impossible and Ransom, both came out in 1996. The writer also used the rule of 3s. The person was an action movie buff. I'd be curious to know what video tapes were in the Ramsey home.
@@Cyprusg21 well whomever wrote it did a good job making it look like Patsy's handwriting then.😘
Excellent analysis, as always.
Serious after all this time nobody has been arrested, it was someone in that house.
To add fuel to the fire...why did Burke Ramsey spend who knows how much money to sue CBS for "defamation of character" when the Ramsey's should have sued the Boulder Police Department for sheer stupidity....which of course they would have done if they were not involved. Hey, Burke, how about throwing a million or two towards reward money for information leading to the arrest of your sister's murderer? How much did you get from that CBS settlement ? I mean, just to make it seem like you give a little damn bit about finding that hideous guy....unless you're looking at him in the mirror.
Absolutely.