This is part of a much larger documentary project about the state of the humanities. If you'd like to see more - www.michaelnayna.com/p/the-reformers-recommended-viewing
PLEASE, you, and EVERYONE, if you haven't already, embrace the One True Only God YHWH Jehovah, Only One Jesus Christ His Only Begotten Son and Lord and Savior of our souls and the Only One Holy Spirit. God is good. God is love. Jesus is Lord. Jesus IS coming. Your soul depends on it! I have seen God act in my life. He saved my soul, changed my heart, changed my mind, helped people through me, took care of people in my life, people I hurt before I found God. God is the only reason I was able to reconcile with my dad before he died. God worked through Jesus Christ to save our souls. Jesus Christ died on the cross for our sins. Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and that God raised Him from the dead and you will be saved. Be baptized in The Holy Spirit, and if He wills, water as well. Repent of your sins, accept God, Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit into your heart, that Jesus Christ died on the cross for your sins. For God so loved the world that He gave His only Begotten Son Jesus Christ, that all who believe on Him shall not perish but have eternal life. Jesus Christ is The Way, The Truth and The Life. No one comes to the Father Jehovah God but through Him. Not long after I got saved I prayed to God for help understanding the Holy Bible, and that same day someone knocked on my door asking me if I wanted to understand the Bible. The Holy Bible says, "love thy enemy", "turn the other cheek", "If your enemy is hungry, feed him", "if he is thirsty, give him a drink", "pray for those who persecute you", "do not repay evil for evil". LORD willing, all humans may commit sin of almost every kind (gay, straight), and that's wrong, and all humans sin, as God tells us through the The Holy Bible, "for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and all are justified freely by His grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus." The Holy Bible also says, "If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness."
I saw this in 2014, this problem on college campuses. I was in college in 2014 in Los Angeles, I saw the active recruitment by the Revolutionary Communist Party, a group of very wealthy older white women, divorced from powerful men and almost universally dumped as bring too old to stay with their powerful spouse, who indeed had younger women now. Using their money available from divorce settlements they "Grey Wives of Hollywood" were now political. There were active cliques that searched for professors and students they could dislike. They approached black and other minority groups and gave monthly stipends as recruitment tools. They bought young, poor, students who needed the extra money to get through college. Within 1 year, I noticed the white student minority(LosA Angeles City college), was being ostracized by peers who until the last semester were friends but now universally shunned. When a straw poll for President was done by my Communications class on this very topic, we asked for a campus election of Presidential candidates. Trump, a non competitor by media pundits, was included at the time as well as the usual suspects in both main party's. We did 2 'elections', one a vote by ballot done on the campus yard in person, with anonymity. The other was done electronically via school email. Funny, the number of respondents was very similar where I expected much higher turnout on the e-ballot. The results were universal. In public, Hillary Clinton was a strong runner with Bernie Sanders, while Trump became a wildcard victor as nobody cared for or liked ANY of the Republican candidates. There were a total of 7 candidates though, 3 Dem 4 rep. While Trump was never seriously considered publicly he won universally in the e-balloting before the Republican primary! Bernie Sanders became the next best candidate. But in public forum at the physical voting booth, only 1 candidate had a chance. Hillary Clinton. I noticed, mainly, the actual fear already shown by those against the prevailing socialist dictatorship arising in our future.
@@keyser456 The cornerstone of modern Western society has been feelings over reason for quite sometime. We have just reached the point in recent times where this rejection of reason has started manifesting as an opposition to even basic truths we used to know and hold from common sense and experience.
@@eufrosniad994 Even speaking basic truths has been forbidden in much of our new public square. It's deemed "disinformation" and/or "hate speech". Straight out of 1984.
You cannot control people to do what is not rational with the truth. That is why rejecting the truth through broken logic delivered by narratives is always apparent. In this case It’s a fight for power by the weak against the dominant.
It might be a fact, but the upset has to do with the deliberate confusion of gender and sex. Sex is biological and can be male, female, or intersex (rare). Gender is a social construct and whether or not purposefully, typically boxes one's sex into a set of social norms. Conservatives want to control females into a submissive second class citizenship, whereas progressives want anyone, regardless of sex (or ethnicity while we are at it), to be free of rigid social constructs. What she should have said is males are taller on average; Presumably, her being on a panel would infer she understands that distinction.
@@BicycleFunkthat’s Heather Heying, so yes she’s competent to be on that panel commenting on such things, and yes she did say ON AVERAGE. Moreover, she’s not a conservative and most people on that panel aren’t, not that it should even matter.
I love how professionally this was done. They weren’t trying to make the protesters look dumb, or ask them loaded questions. Rather, they asked the protesters for their take on the matter. This really was the best way to let the actions speak for themselves. Hats off for good journalism.
@@kuroitsukidaThat’s the point, instead of the interviewers trying to bait, they made fools out of themselves by not even being able to articulate why they are upset.
Because when you believe insane things it's like dividing by zero. So if you ask the right questions you will lead them by their own answers to a contradiction showing that they don't believe what they are saying.
Exactly that's why basketball players aren't typically short DUH. These people r plain dumb and so called educated also they talk with a lisp and end sentences sounding like a question whatever
I work for a large health insurance organization, with women making up 70% of the employee population, with a female president, and with mostly female executives. Guess what, when they talk about diversity and inclusion, they still are making the case for having more women everywhere in the company.
@@MikeNayna It's not just about resources; it's about gaining an unfair advantage. This is a clear attempt to achieve more power by using identity as a means of discrimination. The opposite of what it claims, which is fairness of opportunity. Psychologically it’s “unconscious projection”. People are most critical of faults within themselves
I took first year sociology based in conflict theory. I never heard them talk about love and acceptance. It was mostly angry young kids spewing hate, entitlement. When you cite stats or facts they try to shout over top of you like a two year olds, or they pivot to their favorite place - the victim. Victimhood is all any of them know. These are toddlers who have mastered the fine art of being comfortable in a shitty diaper
Yeah...nothing says "We are the rational ones" like implementing always failed Right Wing policies over and over and over again hoping for a different result, trying to elect a bumbling, criminal, treasonous Reality TV show clown to the presidency and always ending up on the wrong side of history.....oh...wait...
Now imagine if they had real power. Not merely to cancel someone, but to minecraft someone... How high do you think their count would be, if they could get away with it?
You do realize the first book burnings by the Nazi's included books discussing gender and sex before later exterminating many homosexuals and transgender people, regardless of ethnicity, right?
@TheHare-rv3hjThis is often said as a joke, but it is true. I’ve been on the receiving end of so many outbursts by this type, prone to it due to my social grouping, and it’s wild. Stay indoors or don’t engage with people when you know you’re off your rocker. They say “I’m off those currently” like it’s empowering. With some, it’s actually like dealing with two people or half of one. When off meds. It’s not healthy for them, for what they want, or the rest of society. It’s just a free for all and it needs to be reigned in so that people who are actually a THEY have the best chance at life, which currently many THEYs are ruining just for the sake of chaos (for whatever reason I’ve independently heard many Thems say they love chaos and not in an Ian Malcolm way). Chaos is literally the opposite of society. We live in a society. And plenty of THEYs are actually rational and normal contributors. It’s always the loud ones who demand they represent everybody else. The ones who sit around silently need to stand up and tell them to sit down.
Probably because they're a big tall man, and that directly contradicts their entire belief system that they're somehow this smol petite waman they identify as.
Undamaged, healthy adults is a term I believe just does not exist. Everyone is damaged. Most of us just don't realize it thus don't heal from their wounds. A damaged mature adult who is aware of his or her wounds and capacity for evil and tries to heal the wounds and do good. Damaged immature adult who is unaware of his or her wounds and capacity for evil ands thus does not try to heal them and blames everyone but him or herself while doing evil things under the guise of doing good things. Pick one.
@@peetstf6654 You're quite the professional at splitting hairs. What is your average success rate when it comes to dodging questions? And have you been practicing long enough to have compiled a comprehensive data set?
Echo chambers are very powerful brainwashing techniques. Tied to a carrot and stick, they are devastating. Google appears to have all three. Life is too short to work in such an environment.
To be fair the green haired girl and the black guy tried to say that they omitted parts that they thought were important, but their fragile ego seems to prevent them from debating those points during the Q and A time. The only option that they think they have is to make a scene. It's really quite pathetic.
Emotional people rarely have a solution nor reasonable detail on why they're upset. They just see it through the eyes of emotion and eagerness for feeling a morality high. They think something is wrong. They only know how to react. They're enforcers, not the brains. Useful fools for an agenda.
@@RB-ib3nf I think green haired guy and black girl, you mean? 😂 🤷🏼♀️ That's why the basic biological differences mentioned by the speaker upset them so much.
You can see the gears turn inside its head, but the output of it is so garbage that even it seems to gain some weird form of self-awareness for only a fleeting moment.
Like, like , like hardly a sentence without that repetitive word. Can hardly string a sentence together. So yes you have wasted your college education 😂😂
CORRECTION: Liberal females tried to silence this guy and liberal females of peace and tolerance were throwing violent tantrums again. The rot from within...
All of you want that though. Both "sides" are pro corporate and pro authoritarian. Who cares which one is 'worse", when it is tribalistic denialism regardless of which establishment stooge they vote for. All of you are in a cult.
Yeah, I’m confused. Was something out of context or did they really get upset when the panel pointed out the objective biological differences in men and women in regard to height, muscle mass, fat distribution? How on earth is that offensive?
@@jaquevius They showed up to protest the event and were being beligerant early in the talk. They had headphones on as an act of protest and I think thier walk out was timed so they could make a scene.
@@bradpnw1897 Not just fired, but your career prospects are destroyed to make sure you are never hired again by even someone else. These people are no joke.
To clear up your confusion, the reaction has to do with the deliberate confusion of gender and sex. Sex is biological and can be male, female, or intersex (rare). Gender is a social construct and whether or not purposefully, typically boxes one's sex into a set of social norms. Conservatives want to control females into a submissive second class citizenship, whereas progressives want anyone, regardless of sex (or ethnicity while we are at it), to be free of rigid social constructs. What she should have said is males are taller on average; Presumably, her being on a panel would infer she understands that distinction.
@@BicycleFunk First thing to understand is that the reason people oppose what you said is because gender roles are not an arbitrary social construct. It is built on top of the biological reality. Second thing you need to realize is that the notion of women as second class citizens is a modern notion. Most men and women in history simply had roles they tried to do their best in to simply survive. Women didn’t get involved in hunting, soldiering or farming necessarily because they weren’t allowed. They were simply not interested and frankly would find it infuriating to have to raise the children and educate them while them also having to do such tasks. Speaking of the issue of submission, everyone in society was subject to another. Even today, this is no different. A woman would have to submit to her superiors in the work place and follow their lead on decisions. So the idea that submitting to her husband or her father back in the day was an atrocity lacks the argumentative power you seem to think it has. After all, men were also living in submission to other men and even women when the monarch was a Queen and so forth. So it appears that you are a soul who has the knowledge, but lacks the critical thinking ability to properly arrive at conclusions and make connections with the knowledge you possess. That is not good. Please do try to rectify that habit.
No, they walked out because there was no one in authority to shut down the speaker, which translates into the couple not being in control. This is classic psychosis. They can't discern reality from happy dream. Reality threatens their mental security so they turn to abusive control to preserve their insanity. This couple (and the others) lost the control-battle during this gathering and reacted predictably as delusional people will.
Those blue haired people were really upset about men being taller than women. It’s insane that those are the kind of people that somehow had a stranglehold on corporate ideology for like 7 years.
But that’s also free speech, the fact that someone else can get mad at what you say is free speech. Idk if you understand what free speech is. Free speech is being able to say what you want and if you can say what you want someone else can also say what they want even if it makes you feel sad, they are not the government they are another person like your self so they are exercising their free speech and if you don’t like what they say someone something else to them. Simple
They aren't a minority, they are a product. You refuse to see what is right in front of you. People who are a product of the US corporate monopoly system. And there's going to be a LOT more of them.
@kekie3703 Wow you're disingenuous. Yes they're free to dissent but they're not free to block somebody else's speech. Think about what you're writing ffs.
I am female and engineer, when I was in school, there were only 3 more females on engineering program with me. It was overwhelmingly male. And as he said, for a reason. Not to be able to say that man and females are different without someone getting offended is insanity.
Hey, I'm from India, when i was pursuing my bachelor's degree, there were 8 women in my class compared to 38 men, including myself, which is better compared to my masters degree with 15 men and 2 women.
The few women in my physics programs turned out to be the most insufferable, most overcompensating individuals too...Even when they are there, they aren't shaping up to be good scientists / engineers.
I started programming computers about 1972. Went through a trade-type school. Almost half the class was women. I read articles in trade publications describing how balanced the profession was because it didn't have a long male-dominated history like other disciplines. But over the years, more women would leave for other careers than men. It wasn't a lot, but over time it added up until there were mostly men. Then I think the word got out and fewer women pursued the field. When I earned my Master's degree, there were still a decent percent of women, though less. Where I worked, the women were accepted just like everyone else. I saw no difference. But women still drifted away at a high rate than men.
that WOMAN got upset about the quote "men on average are taller, correct?" raises her hand to have an issue, walks away. why is it those people who claim to be unique always look like they are wearing a uniform? you already know their political stance, and moral compass. they have none.
Yeah, they actually want to destroy society as we know it. They are brainwashed by those who are pushing communism and socialism. I think it's a symptom of the still ongoing part of the cold war. In a sense these are brainwashed into being traitors to their own heritage.
His firing was challenged but to no avail. Google has never admitted that they did anything wrong, and James Damore was left without fair compensation and had to move on to the next chapter in his life, which he did. It's over now. Google committed a heinous act and paid NO price for it. Solution is to not use google products. I only use Maps and Translate, NEVER the search engine.
James Damore is a democrat who has voted for and empowered evil his whole life. The logical conclusion of what democrats strive for (communism) is being reached. He is not a victim... he is Dr. Frankenstein... Of as Stalin said, a "useful idiot". This video is years old and is a repost. We could hope that James has learned he was on the wrong side and has cast all his trash democrat ideas in the garbage where they belong, but I have no idea if he has... I doubt it, but he is smart so maybe. I do know that I have ZERO sympathy for democrats who get what they voted for.
Another fact (my sister is Native American) native Americans also have the wrong issues many tribes actually eat those that they killed for multiple reasons but still. Many nations were constantly at war and acted like barbarians. Yes, they lived with one with the land and respected the land but there are some negatives. I have many Native American friends aside from my sister, and I have learned a lot in my over 50 years of life about many cultures Native Americans did the same things that of many other nations did.
@@ProxyAuthenticationRequired The pre-industrial average is very largely skewed by child mortality. Fifty may have been old for them but that's the point.
I'm convinced that bright day-glo hair dye is just the 21st Century version of brown shirts and arm bands. Exact same prejudices, tactics and reactions.
@@joshb6993 So you think that the people holding tiki torches chanting "Jews will not replace us" in Charlottesville are not the 21st century brown shirts? You seem as rational as the blue haired people.
and this is a strong reason why tech should spread out beyond California, which is corrupting it to the point where it will create enemies in the form of regulatory control. Also, California has too many NIMBYs and regulations itself to allow for the growth needed to accommodate the tech sector. Spread that wealth to other places; it should never be concentrated physically or ideologically. There is security in being spread out.
@@backtoschool9760 I wish. Unfortunately it is still heavily concentrated, as is VC. You will know it’s done when the left finally gets voted out after property values fall significantly and they start begging companies to return. They are still in the denial stage.
I was a programmer and I never received any support from mgmt. Matter of fact, it was the opposite. P.S. I would never work for Google. Too many lawsuits for doing illegal and sneaky things.
@@purdysanchez The Iron Cross has nothing to do with the SS. The Iron Cross was the highest military commendation in Germany for over 100 years before the NawtZees even existed. Also, the double lighting bolts were insignias on their uniforms, not tattoos on their skin (although, some may have gotten tattoos of it, that is neither here nor there). How can you be right and yet so wrong at the same time?
@@pigpuke, I'm referring to what the tattoos generally mean in America. Not the Historical use of them by the German military. In America these are usually prison tattoos associated with white supremacists.
The less attention the blue hair things get, the darker and cleaner the blue hair gets . It's usually a "transition" that starts with obnoxious light shitty blue and ends in violence once the transition to full dark blue takes place.
Colored hair is their freedom of expression, just as choosing your gender is an attempt to being free from social constructs. Is the world you want to live in one where people are afraid to express themselves?
It's not Red vs Blue, it's the rational vs irrational extremism that can be found all across the political spectrum. It's the disconnect between a simulated reality we immerse ourselves in through online "discourse" and the tangible, practical reality of interpersonal cooperation. We've become far too comfortable in our echo chambers to the point where even hearing something we dont immediately agree with has become intolerable. Such a society cannot keep itself together for very long. We have to rethink our collective relationship with social media if we want to save our nation.
In my class of 85 males and 24 females, a company came for placements and recruits 6 females and only 2 males. Not even a single women is in top 10 and only 3 in top 20 in class.
Well not exactly, it appears they were annoyed by downplaying of something. But when you stomp your feet we don't get to learn what exactly are you taking issue with
Those who walked out in response to hearing: "men are on average taller than women" should consider working on a farm and living off the gird for a week; only eating food they cultivate and/or kill. It'll help with perspective on what's important.
Fucking how exactly will that work? Can you please explain? I'm annoyed that they walked out to men being on average taller, but fail to see how a farm solves it.
@@BuckysKnifeFlip Because it will show the differences in biology. Men are expected to be strong enough to do most of the labor in a farm and as a result bulk up, become taller.
All this cancelling of people is feminine and cowardly, all done from a keyboard. Microaggression is just a feminine pretend word, one of many. Behold the rot from within.
@@hajovonta6300 I can't wrap my head around why more people have not grasped this fact. There are so many articles and documentation, even admissions from H.R. reps that they are there to mitigate Liability for the Company, not the employee. Think of a Lawyer; They represent the Organization, NOT YOU.
I'm training as an electrician. At trade school there were 3-4 women in my class at the beginning. Now there are 2. I never heard anything disparaging from teachers or other students. Those women never mentioned any difficulties with discrimination at work. They simply found the profession not to their liking. So already few women are interested in being electricians, and the few that are sometimes find that they don't enjoy it. This is ok!
“You can’t just argue against… against fact” Yep. Someone told them something wrong, with absolute certainty. Sociologists must be stopped, we let them think they’re real science for too long.
@@donk8961 Marxist sociologists, to be specific. And Marxists of many other disciplines. Violent disruption and "activism" is what they're about. My question is why is the teaching of this ideology being tolerated (if not promoted) by our government? Do THEY have some kind of agenda?
@aspensulphate Idiot puppets are easy to sway into voting for [insert party]. What's nefarious is that they give the illusion of an opposition as well. There are things normal today that are so insane that they're borderline unfathomable.
@@aspensulphate - The agenda of the modern day communist is to destroy the nation and re-create a new totalitarian slave/police state (a new Soviet Union). The useful idiots (followers / NPCs) just recite the words they have been taught (the one's we see on youtube). They have been brain washed to believe they are ushering in a new era of "Social Justice, Freedom, Peace, Democracy, Liberty, etc". All communist movements start off as "Social Justice" to correct the wrong doings of the past. The end is always a brutal communist regime i.e., the USSR.
That is not education, it is re-education like totalitarian societies use to get people "right". If this bullshit gets a foothold it will then become indoctrination. If that happens, we're all screwed.
How are you offended by someone saying that men tend to be taller? Especially since women who are attracted to men, normally want men who are taller than them?
Because when a man pretends he is a woman and someone else says the truth which refutes his identity it causes the man that is a fake woman to go into a crisis of identity which is very uncomfortable and makes him melt down. These confused people should be taken to a safe place and provided the treatment they need..
EDIT: Since some of my comments are being deleted, I'll simply incorporate them into this one going forward. @johnabbotphotography 1. I doubt that was their sole reason for leaving. Human action is usually more nuanced. 1.1 Shortly after leaving the auditorium, they mention that this guest speaker was a "paid" guest speaker -- by student money. They may have known beforehand what his speech would entail, and simply showed up in protest. 1.2 The contents of his memo consisted of harmful stereotypes. I read some of his memo. Personally, it's largely pseudo-scientific drivel. Why? Because the studies he cites to make claims about sexual difference are not only NOT definitive, but he extrapolates from them to conflate sexual difference with gendered difference. The studies he cites do not make this conflation; they speak to sexual difference: biologically male and biologically female participants. In order to draw conclusions about gendered difference, the studies cited would need to involve participants that identify as man or woman, and as you may or may not disagree with, this is a wide spectrum. Nonetheless, studies that elucidate patterns about gender are not equivalent to those that elucidate patterns about sex. 1.3 Like most people, he doesn't grasp that the ethos, or ethics, of diversity campaigns is social justice; his memo insists on "demoralizing" diversity, effectively making it financially driven -- which would never work to commiserate those historically and institutionally discriminated against. His point of view on this particular issue can be considered malicious because it erases the very real, and targeted institutional harm that minorities and queer folk are subjected to on account of their identity, or immutable attributes, rather than talent, skill, or merit. 1.4 The woman beside him follows with a false-equivalence to the effect of 'women are shorter than men,' rather than 'males are taller than females.' It is a dogmatic framing of gender and sex, and one that attempts to erase the possibility of gender non-conformity. Furthermore, not all scientific facts are scientific law, certainly as it pertains to something as malleable and adaptable as human biology. Lastly, his memo was hardly scientific. To follow his speech with a claim about height difference between genders, as if it is factual, can be upsetting. It illustrates that the conversation is ideologically driven, and not earnest. Hope this...helps? @markaurelius61 Everything is thoroughly intertwined. That is an ambiguous claim. The proposition here isn't whether they are intertwined, but that they a) should not be confused, and b) are distinct conceptually, and under the purview of different fields of inquiry: genetics versus psychology. You are entitled to believe that queer-identity is bad. That is the value judgement many of you operate on, for reasons only you can speak to. What I am here to share is that, regardless of it being bad: it and sex exist in different realities. No human expression can change the reality of sex. Sex is genetic, chromosomal. But language, cultural practice, and convention -- social constructs -- have always shaped gender identity, gender expression, and gender roles across several civilizations throughout human history. Edit: I should also add, if your underlying concern is population growth, or the possibility of human extinction, there are far more pressing existential threats than the self-expression of 0.002% of the global population. Climate change, economic inequality, war, pollution are more impactful areas to focus on.
They thought a man was a woman so if you challenge that by saying that men and women are real things in reality it destroys their false identity which is based on a lie.
@zasterheffor the blue-haired gentleman literally raised his hand in response to Heather's "does anyone take offense to this fact [that men, as a group, are taller than women, as a group]"? So, I think it's safe to say that he did, in fact, take issue with that basic statement of empirical truth?? (I can put question marks after affirmative statements too!) Also, James' memo was making statements-- whether you believe them to be scientifically sound or not-- on what *is* : observing the reality of our sexual dimorphism-- both morphological and psychological-- is not necessarily a statement of what *ought* to be; e.g. if I state that women, as a sex, are more drawn to people rather than things in how they go about choosing careers, this doesn't mean that I'm also somehow implying that a woman who *does* have an aptitude and interest in robotics, for example, *shouldn't* be allowed to or encouraged to go into that field. You can't on the one hand claim that you have no issue with an empirical discussion on sex-specific differences, but then on the other hand claim that do so is to "promote harmful stereotypes".
@@sonmi2246 I made a couple comments that were censored... I try again. Reality refutes their false identity which offends them. James was 100% right in his memo and to say otherwise is to be confused about reality like the the blue man.
The common intollerance of the people who can't explain their reactions, because they are based entirely on feelings, which stem from never being checked, or never resolving their trauma.
Especially when their "trauma" is not being as attractive, intelligent, or financially advantaged as other people . We are not born with the same gifts and capacities, and thus, you can be equal or you can be free .Naturally, those that feel that they were born at a disadvantage are perfectly willing to give up freedom to feel that they are more equal . Much of the sexual identity issue has it's basis in the same issues of choice; they wish to argue over or try to subvert all choices that were made without their bidding.It is an absurd obsession, that guarantees that their lives will be wasted chasing that never intended to be .
They have no "trauma" these are upper-middle class suburban kids. What? They got a green bike when they were 10 instead of a blue one and now they are traumatized? No, they are just whiney little crybullies who are used to getting their own way all the time.
You don't understand what's happening at all... You think they have "zero self-awareness"? This implies you think they don't understand what they are doing. Surely you heard "do not underestimate your enemy"... I've been watching democrat filth for 22+yrs... They know EXACTLY what they are doing, so correct your thinking, and assume your enemy is strong not weak.
As soon as they / them say “If I were to tell you any thoughts on this event, it would be more than this event is worth”, while taking the time to attend the event, you know they have no thoughts…
If there’s one thing I’ve learned during my time in Corporate America is that you can be right at the wrong time, some battles you have to know how to politically move around, diversity, women really any “woke” agenda has to be treated with care it’s often not a hill worth dying on
I guess if you can suppress your feelings, but that’s soul crushing for a lot of people. I’d rather work minimum wage than pretend the nonsense is normal. I don’t know how people go to work everyday just to pretend like this shit is all good. 🤢
I worked at Google at the time he was fired. Even though I'm liberal, a minority, it was a disgrace our CEO to ignore the valid points he raised and simply fired him for writing that memo (and latch on to a single word he used, which was OK in clinical world but not acceptable in today's woke culture).
And his motive was for diversity, just completely ignored simply because of words and people taking offense. It's as simple as hatred towards one person, and they are incredibly stupid not to see it.
@@sandhya2024 you can Google his memo it's posted online, it's very long and windy, maybe ask ChatGPT to summarize it. Basically it's asking why so few women chose computer science major and even fewer chose it as a profession. Unfortunately he used the wrong word
He made the explicit point as to why a growing number of individuals who side with a particular viewpoint "Can't" and "won't" speak up or be a part of the discussion due to repercussions, his fate at google was precisely the undisputed truth.
More accurately, Portland, Seattle, etc are hotbeds of communism. These people are this way because they have been indoctrinated by communists... this is how it's always been done. The democrat party is now the communist party. The entire education system is 100% democrat controlled... it's the first institution they captured many many decades ago. These kids parents were indoctrinated already. It's a new kind of commie revolution. And they have almost total control of the media and big tech and the government.
They are indoctrinated communists... they are taught to not listen... that's THE POINT of communist propaganda... They were taught by their professors.. probably same in K-12, and most likely their parents who were also indoctrinated in the democrat controlled education system.
0:45 “Jimmy! Jimmy! Pan the camera to the blue hair! Pan the camera to the blue- Perfect! Hold it there! That’s thumbnail worthy!… This thing is gonna get triggered. Just wait for it.”
Grown adults acting like they're lack of parenting is everybody else's problem. Most people hit the bottle or do heroin but these freaks just like to tard rage in public.
It’s his speech at Portland State - this is the actual one I think, the cameras are just cinematic. He’s just a guy who doesn’t know when to keep to himself. People will cite this as proof that ‘conservatives are discriminated against’ while ignoring you can be fired for anything here.
I remember this guy and this incident. He spoke at Portalnd State University about what happened while I was living in that nut hell hole of a city. It was the start of my awakening. I left portland shortly after and have never been happier and so grateful.
Those kids at the end can't even conjure basic language to defend their positions because I think they know somewhere deep down that their positions are indefensible.
I forgot about this guy!!!! He has a point about being able to bring your self to work as conservative or Christian. While see progressive ideas implemented and room made for Islam, we see the majority of working class in ideas and beliefs repressed!!!
The fact that there are so many people who walked out after hearing facts terrifies me. The comment about the rejection of reality is something they really need to think on. They really just proved his point so well though. People like that will not listen to reason.
No, he should be head of "hiring and firing" while DEI is defunded and removed from existence. THEN, he should be hired as an engineer so he can then solve problems that aren't common sense, basic reality and that he actually enjoys doing (which is what he wanted to do in the first place).
"Diversity" shouldn't exist at all in society. Not as a "department" or agency, anyway, and by-and-large not in society itself as it has been repeatedly proven by history that "diverse" cities and states collapse due to in-fighting, not external forces.
this 'google memo' thing, was the moment I woke up. I actually read it before I knew the nature of the controversy, hadn't heard any editorializing, found it to be ... a non issue, then I kept hearing how the media was spinning it, went back and read it again, because I must have been missing something... nope. All I saw was ideological intolerance from activists and journalists
Now you need to look closer... it's NOT "ideological intolerance from activists and journalists". These people are this way because they have been indoctrinated by communists... this is how it's always been done. The democrat party is now the communist party. The entire education system is 100% democrat controlled... it's the first institution they captured many many decades ago. These kids parents were indoctrinated already. It's a new kind of commie revolution. And they have almost total control of the media and big tech and the government. You aren't totally wrong, it's virtue-signaling... you just need to zoom out and see the bigger picture... it's much worse than you think.
What makes it to the headlines or sound bites or snippets of video presented to the public through media channels is usually altered, filtered, framed, or spun. The raw video, raw interviews, raw text, raw events if recorded are always much more detailed, nuanced, or otherwise accurate. They just are not summarized or concise, so the job fell onto editors to choose what's important for the audience. Originally, journalism formed as a decent profession with ethics and honor to the truth, not to agendas or biases, but much of that has been eroded away with the long-term daily grind of agendas causing attrition, the ratings boon of political framing, inserting commentary, spinning the events to match an ideology, or omitting/downplaying certain aspects to make the events fit into the boxes they want.
I’ve been in the software business since the late 90s. Women do not like tech. They like using it, but they don’t like developing it. Why is this such a bad thing?
Imagine the mental sickness of a powerful group behind the scenes who would want to engineer a culture of young people to think this way. That's the only way these ideas could come to have more importance than facts and reality itself to large amounts of people. Nothing natural about this phenomenon, it has been willfully engineered into society.
Do religions need "a powerful group behind the scenes" with "mental sickness" to bring them into existence/prominence? No. Now, this particular faith does have a fairly powerful group pushing it, but one that is very much NOT behind the scenes. Academics and educational administrators. If you are alleging any other conspiracy, show me the evidence, otherwise you're just a conspiracy theorist.
We don't need to imagine it, it's not new. These people are this way because they have been indoctrinated by communists... this is how it's always been done. The democrat party is now the communist party. The entire education system is 100% democrat controlled... it's the first institution they captured many many decades ago. These kids parents were indoctrinated already. It's a new kind of commie revolution. And they have almost total control of the media and big tech and the government.
They don't actually care about creating a more inclusive workplace. They do this to create an authoritarian culture where people are afraid to go against management and to not get sued. This is such an annoying culture and I experienced it at school. All the kids who enjoy power tripping go up to you and make you do some performative gesture in the name of tolerance.
Many people felt the same way about Woodstock and the sex drugs and rock and roll culture that appeared out of nowhere in the 60s. A lot of similarities in how the culture shifted. After Charles Manson exposed the evil behind that rhetoric, culture calmed down for a while. We're back at it again, just with some modern twists.
Blue haired crybaby made me sick because of how much they wanted to 'blame and run'. Anyone can run off and be a crybaby during a fight. Warriors stand their ground. You have to stand and fight. No respect for that individual.
@@Denniss7420 Nope just some people that their parents failed in raising them properly. They are the examples why you need to take an interest in your child’s life.
I remember discussing this firing in my business ethics class. I made some statement about how the exact demographics of a job are rarely going to exactly match the demographics of the population, and that it’s not necessarily racism or sexism causing that. Some woman in the class claimed that sexism was why less women are in software engineering jobs. I asked her why she wasn’t majoring comp-sci. 🤷♂️
So much money and effort has gone into bringing girls and women into Comp Sci. And the ratios stay the same. I guess they need to force these obstinate women to do what's good for them. You will code, ladies!
No worries. Plenty of recent interest in the political ghost in Google's search engine. It's relevant again because it seems so few people understand how deep it all runs and for how long. www.michaelnayna.com/p/gemini-is-a-committee
@@MikeNaynabut we understand the impact it is having on the wider society. From a distance it looks like generational facism as a reaction to being barred from economic resources. Housing, jobs, family etc. I am 63.
Notice how when he asks it "What are your thoughts" and it seems confused by that question as if it couldn't understand the context and had to be further clarified about what just happened less than 3 minutes ago. These people truly live in an alternate reality and can't seem to put two and two together.
The fact you are referring to the creature as "it" (gender-neutral, of course) rather than "they" (grammatically incorrect) is great. Much easier to follow along than using a plural pronoun for an individual 😂
@@bofa722 Thank you! When an intelligent living creature, a coyote for instance, wanders through my yard and I don't know its gender, "it" is perfectly acceptable. I don't see why the same shouldn't hold for humans. Pronoun problem solved!
@@bucc5207 agreed. Even one of my English language professors in uni who's very liberal said it was complete garbage and a butchering of the English language lol
Years ago, like 2007, 2008, before blue hair thing had become SO prevalent, we were walking down the Main Street of in a little village in Upstate NY. Along came a trio of teenagers. The girl in the middle had a fresh color of REALLY intense ROYAL BLUE hair. As they walked toward, and past us, they seemed to be discussing their financial situations and the difficulty of getting a job, and the blue-haired girl, said, "I just don't understand why no one will take me seriously!" Oh, boy.
This is part of a much larger documentary project about the state of the humanities. If you'd like to see more - www.michaelnayna.com/p/the-reformers-recommended-viewing
Is this comment pinned? If not it should be.
@@mountbara Yep. Pinned. Did you not see it on first pass?
@@MikeNayna When I changed to newest, it dropped way down the page. No, but glad it was!
PLEASE, you, and EVERYONE, if you haven't already, embrace the One True Only God YHWH Jehovah, Only One Jesus Christ His Only Begotten Son and Lord and Savior of our souls and the Only One Holy Spirit. God is good. God is love. Jesus is Lord. Jesus IS coming. Your soul depends on it!
I have seen God act in my life. He saved my soul, changed my heart, changed my mind, helped people through me, took care of people in my life, people I hurt before I found God. God is the only reason I was able to reconcile with my dad before he died.
God worked through Jesus Christ to save our souls. Jesus Christ died on the cross for our sins. Believe in your heart and confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and that God raised Him from the dead and you will be saved. Be baptized in The Holy Spirit, and if He wills, water as well. Repent of your sins, accept God, Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit into your heart, that Jesus Christ died on the cross for your sins.
For God so loved the world that He gave His only Begotten Son Jesus Christ, that all who believe on Him shall not perish but have eternal life. Jesus Christ is The Way, The Truth and The Life. No one comes to the Father Jehovah God but through Him.
Not long after I got saved I prayed to God for help understanding the Holy Bible, and that same day someone knocked on my door asking me if I wanted to understand the Bible.
The Holy Bible says, "love thy enemy", "turn the other cheek", "If your enemy is hungry, feed him", "if he is thirsty, give him a drink", "pray for those who persecute you", "do not repay evil for evil".
LORD willing, all humans may commit sin of almost every kind (gay, straight), and that's wrong, and all humans sin, as God tells us through the The Holy Bible, "for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and all are justified freely by His grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus." The Holy Bible also says, "If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness."
I saw this in 2014, this problem on college campuses. I was in college in 2014 in Los Angeles, I saw the active recruitment by the Revolutionary Communist Party, a group of very wealthy older white women, divorced from powerful men and almost universally dumped as bring too old to stay with their powerful spouse, who indeed had younger women now. Using their money available from divorce settlements they "Grey Wives of Hollywood" were now political.
There were active cliques that searched for professors and students they could dislike. They approached black and other minority groups and gave monthly stipends as recruitment tools. They bought young, poor, students who needed the extra money to get through college.
Within 1 year, I noticed the white student minority(LosA Angeles City college), was being ostracized by peers who until the last semester were friends but now universally shunned.
When a straw poll for President was done by my Communications class on this very topic, we asked for a campus election of Presidential candidates. Trump, a non competitor by media pundits, was included at the time as well as the usual suspects in both main party's.
We did 2 'elections', one a vote by ballot done on the campus yard in person, with anonymity. The other was done electronically via school email. Funny, the number of respondents was very similar where I expected much higher turnout on the e-ballot.
The results were universal.
In public, Hillary Clinton was a strong runner with Bernie Sanders, while Trump became a wildcard victor as nobody cared for or liked ANY of the Republican candidates. There were a total of 7 candidates though, 3 Dem 4 rep.
While Trump was never seriously considered publicly he won universally in the e-balloting before the Republican primary!
Bernie Sanders became the next best candidate.
But in public forum at the physical voting booth, only 1 candidate had a chance. Hillary Clinton.
I noticed, mainly, the actual fear already shown by those against the prevailing socialist dictatorship arising in our future.
This guy is such an engineer. Tries to solve the problem rather than realising it's a social game of BS.
Exactly. This guy likes facts in an era obsessed with feelings.
He's young. Eventually he'll realize logic and reason have been flipped on their head in society. You can't reason with unreasonable people.
@@keyser456 The cornerstone of modern Western society has been feelings over reason for quite sometime. We have just reached the point in recent times where this rejection of reason has started manifesting as an opposition to even basic truths we used to know and hold from common sense and experience.
@@eufrosniad994 Even speaking basic truths has been forbidden in much of our new public square. It's deemed "disinformation" and/or "hate speech". Straight out of 1984.
You cannot control people to do what is not rational with the truth. That is why rejecting the truth through broken logic delivered by narratives is always apparent. In this case It’s a fight for power by the weak against the dominant.
They evacuate the room the moment facts reach their ears.
Their fairy tale must go on
And then they are asked for their thoughts and in a moment of self-realization, realize they have none.
It might be a fact, but the upset has to do with the deliberate confusion of gender and sex. Sex is biological and can be male, female, or intersex (rare). Gender is a social construct and whether or not purposefully, typically boxes one's sex into a set of social norms. Conservatives want to control females into a submissive second class citizenship, whereas progressives want anyone, regardless of sex (or ethnicity while we are at it), to be free of rigid social constructs. What she should have said is males are taller on average; Presumably, her being on a panel would infer she understands that distinction.
Yeah, because they are spoiled children who feel throwing a tantrum is an acceptable way to respond to anything they don't like.
@@BicycleFunkthat’s Heather Heying, so yes she’s competent to be on that panel commenting on such things, and yes she did say ON AVERAGE. Moreover, she’s not a conservative and most people on that panel aren’t, not that it should even matter.
I love how professionally this was done. They weren’t trying to make the protesters look dumb, or ask them loaded questions. Rather, they asked the protesters for their take on the matter. This really was the best way to let the actions speak for themselves. Hats off for good journalism.
Ya, they couldn't even articulate anything.
@@Q5000 In what they did articulate was empty nonsense
@@kuroitsukidaThat’s the point, instead of the interviewers trying to bait, they made fools out of themselves by not even being able to articulate why they are upset.
These kind of protesters don't need any help making them look dumb!
Because when you believe insane things it's like dividing by zero. So if you ask the right questions you will lead them by their own answers to a contradiction showing that they don't believe what they are saying.
“Just because you’re offended, doesn’t make you right.” -Ricky Gervais
Exactly that's why basketball players aren't typically short DUH. These people r plain dumb and so called educated also they talk with a lisp and end sentences sounding like a question whatever
The gals walking out r overeducated people who think they r too good to work like the rest of us!
Tell that to 2024 progressives 😂
Yes
Um yes it does, excuse you. That’s a fact
They literally walked out after hearing men are on average taller than women
No-IQ NPCs
No doubt many had to get back to their kindergarten class. "Teaching" the next generation is important.
REEEEEEE 😂😅
The disgusting thing is, these people are taking up child psychologist careers, child therapists, teachers, and more.
"My thoughts?"
so ignorant
I work for a large health insurance organization, with women making up 70% of the employee population, with a female president, and with mostly female executives.
Guess what, when they talk about diversity and inclusion, they still are making the case for having more women everywhere in the company.
For all its platitudes, 'equity' is just identity groups binding together to secure resources within overcrowded labour markets.
@@MikeNayna It's not just about resources; it's about gaining an unfair advantage. This is a clear attempt to achieve more power by using identity as a means of discrimination. The opposite of what it claims, which is fairness of opportunity.
Psychologically it’s “unconscious projection”. People are most critical of faults within themselves
@@MikeNayna I like this take.
@@haroldberman1341 Of course you do! You probably like Trump, too.
@@patricias5122 Excellent stuff
They profess love and acceptance, but their actions say otherwise.
Intolerance and inability to regulate emotions.
Whatever a Marxist professes is most assuredly the opposite of what will be produced.
Very true. God bless you 🙏
Quite often projecting violence, while simultaneously claiming to be the victim.
I took first year sociology based in conflict theory. I never heard them talk about love and acceptance. It was mostly angry young kids spewing hate, entitlement. When you cite stats or facts they try to shout over top of you like a two year olds, or they pivot to their favorite place - the victim. Victimhood is all any of them know. These are toddlers who have mastered the fine art of being comfortable in a shitty diaper
"men are taller on average"
"You've been brainwashed!"
??
facts?! OH NOooooooooooooooooooo. :D
Just a three-year-old having a tantrum.
You might need to translate that to "males are taller on average than females" before you get agreement on the language from the blue haired crowd.
"Of course, chances are pretty good that they'll still throw a hissy fit. Emotional maturity is not strong with that crowd."
For the most part the people that work at google personify the people who are contributing to Kamala Harris‘s election campaign
Being oppressed by the physical reality of the world means one is delusional.
Well said.
Uhh, no. Most suffering is caused by the physical reality of the world. Would you call people who are oppressed by hunger delusional?
@@xa1551 Oppressed by hunger? Suffering is oppression? No. Oppression by abstraction for this conversation maybe.
@@xa1551expecting physical realities to change and getting mad at people for pointing them out is very delusional. Dont play dumb mate use your brain
They never can reasonably explain themselves….they just get offended
Yeah...nothing says "We are the rational ones" like implementing always failed Right Wing policies over and over and over again hoping for a different result, trying to elect a bumbling, criminal, treasonous Reality TV show clown to the presidency and always ending up on the wrong side of history.....oh...wait...
cult like behavior.
Now imagine if they had real power.
Not merely to cancel someone, but to minecraft someone...
How high do you think their count would be, if they could get away with it?
There's no explanation for rejecting reality.
@@dystopiandream7134
Madness...
Insanity...
Nothing screams anti-facist like preventing opposing ideas from being heard.
Well, they're really just Communists, so it's not a surprise.
Communists have a history of putting people into camping situations and environments.
You do realize the first book burnings by the Nazi's included books discussing gender and sex before later exterminating many homosexuals and transgender people, regardless of ethnicity, right?
Then they vote for their party, regardless of who's running 🇩🇪
Are those people even Antifa? Less monolithic, more categorical.
"Anti-fascist" = communist. Yes, communists do prevent opposing ideas from being heard.
That blue haired person had no idea why they were upset
Or what they them were saying
Lacking a chromosome will do that to a manlady
@TheHare-rv3hjThis is often said as a joke, but it is true. I’ve been on the receiving end of so many outbursts by this type, prone to it due to my social grouping, and it’s wild. Stay indoors or don’t engage with people when you know you’re off your rocker.
They say “I’m off those currently” like it’s empowering.
With some, it’s actually like dealing with two people or half of one. When off meds. It’s not healthy for them, for what they want, or the rest of society.
It’s just a free for all and it needs to be reigned in so that people who are actually a THEY have the best chance at life, which currently many THEYs are ruining just for the sake of chaos (for whatever reason I’ve independently heard many Thems say they love chaos and not in an Ian Malcolm way).
Chaos is literally the opposite of society. We live in a society. And plenty of THEYs are actually rational and normal contributors. It’s always the loud ones who demand they represent everybody else. The ones who sit around silently need to stand up and tell them to sit down.
Probably because they're a big tall man, and that directly contradicts their entire belief system that they're somehow this smol petite waman they identify as.
Do those protestors have any clue how insane they seem to undamaged, healthy adults?
Undamaged, healthy adults is a term I believe just does not exist.
Everyone is damaged. Most of us just don't realize it thus don't heal from their wounds.
A damaged mature adult who is aware of his or her wounds and capacity for evil and tries to heal the wounds and do good.
Damaged immature adult who is unaware of his or her wounds and capacity for evil ands thus does not try to heal them and blames everyone but him or herself while doing evil things under the guise of doing good things.
Pick one.
@@-.-Monster literally.
no
@@peetstf6654 You're quite the professional at splitting hairs. What is your average success rate when it comes to dodging questions? And have you been practicing long enough to have compiled a comprehensive data set?
Echo chambers are very powerful brainwashing techniques. Tied to a carrot and stick, they are devastating. Google appears to have all three. Life is too short to work in such an environment.
Shocking that the angry oppressed people can’t articulate ANYTHING that’s oppressive.
Like the guy on the stand
@@dilutioncreation1317 The guy who was fired for raising a valid point at Google? That guy?
To be fair the green haired girl and the black guy tried to say that they omitted parts that they thought were important, but their fragile ego seems to prevent them from debating those points during the Q and A time. The only option that they think they have is to make a scene. It's really quite pathetic.
Emotional people rarely have a solution nor reasonable detail on why they're upset. They just see it through the eyes of emotion and eagerness for feeling a morality high.
They think something is wrong. They only know how to react. They're enforcers, not the brains. Useful fools for an agenda.
@@RB-ib3nf I think green haired guy and black girl, you mean? 😂 🤷🏼♀️ That's why the basic biological differences mentioned by the speaker upset them so much.
Micro-aggressions = aggressions that never happened.
The cameraman saw the trademarked blue hair and already knew that dude was going to cause a problem 😂
On point
I thought it was more the fact they had headphones on and were generally not listening
Yes
They really show how tolerant and open minded they are 😂
It’s like in nature when toxic animals have evolved bright colors as a warning
Poor guy was just way too normal & intelligent for the cult to cope with.
That blue hair thing does not possess any original thoughts.
You can see the gears turn inside its head, but the output of it is so garbage that even it seems to gain some weird form of self-awareness for only a fleeting moment.
"cognitive dissonance bla bla bla"
@@morpheusjones4384They call it “garbage in, garbage out”
Like, like , like hardly a sentence without that repetitive word.
Can hardly string a sentence together.
So yes you have wasted your college education 😂😂
Imagine calling a person "it". Absolutely disgusting behavior.
people actually tried to silence this guy as he was talking about being silenced. People of peace and tolerance throwing violent tantrums again
CORRECTION: Liberal females tried to silence this guy and liberal females of peace and tolerance were throwing violent tantrums again. The rot from within...
Amazing! Unbelievable!
It's like the rude troll who insulted me then demanded my source....yet he wrote a counter statement and didn't provide his own source.
"I'm oppressed." Translation: "I want to oppress you."
Indeed
You can only respond, “Yeah, me too!”
Trust me, they want to do more than oppress you…
i remember reading "being offended don't mean you are right" :) so true
All of you want that though. Both "sides" are pro corporate and pro authoritarian. Who cares which one is 'worse", when it is tribalistic denialism regardless of which establishment stooge they vote for. All of you are in a cult.
Wow that is actually shocking. Utter disbelief. Wtf.
The rabbit hole continues if you're game... www.michaelnayna.com/p/the-reformers-recommended-viewing
Yeah it's so shocking, you almost believe it's not real.
Oh wait, it isn't.
@@gigaus0 What's not real about it?
Yeah, I’m confused. Was something out of context or did they really get upset when the panel pointed out the objective biological differences in men and women in regard to height, muscle mass, fat distribution? How on earth is that offensive?
@@jaquevius They showed up to protest the event and were being beligerant early in the talk. They had headphones on as an act of protest and I think thier walk out was timed so they could make a scene.
It’s hard to believe it takes courage to speak the truth about biology.
Really? Try to call a man a man, when he identifies as a woman...
In a lot of places you are fired for that. God bless you 🙏
@@bradpnw1897 Not just fired, but your career prospects are destroyed to make sure you are never hired again by even someone else. These people are no joke.
To clear up your confusion, the reaction has to do with the deliberate confusion of gender and sex. Sex is biological and can be male, female, or intersex (rare). Gender is a social construct and whether or not purposefully, typically boxes one's sex into a set of social norms. Conservatives want to control females into a submissive second class citizenship, whereas progressives want anyone, regardless of sex (or ethnicity while we are at it), to be free of rigid social constructs. What she should have said is males are taller on average; Presumably, her being on a panel would infer she understands that distinction.
@@BicycleFunk First thing to understand is that the reason people oppose what you said is because gender roles are not an arbitrary social construct. It is built on top of the biological reality. Second thing you need to realize is that the notion of women as second class citizens is a modern notion. Most men and women in history simply had roles they tried to do their best in to simply survive. Women didn’t get involved in hunting, soldiering or farming necessarily because they weren’t allowed. They were simply not interested and frankly would find it infuriating to have to raise the children and educate them while them also having to do such tasks. Speaking of the issue of submission, everyone in society was subject to another. Even today, this is no different. A woman would have to submit to her superiors in the work place and follow their lead on decisions. So the idea that submitting to her husband or her father back in the day was an atrocity lacks the argumentative power you seem to think it has. After all, men were also living in submission to other men and even women when the monarch was a Queen and so forth. So it appears that you are a soul who has the knowledge, but lacks the critical thinking ability to properly arrive at conclusions and make connections with the knowledge you possess. That is not good. Please do try to rectify that habit.
So the couple walked out because men are, on average, taller than women? I'll take a cabin in the woods please, maybe.
Lol apparently truth is evil
@@P-39_Airacobra The local government will follow you out there, in most states.
@@shawnjones4347 better the government than a blue-haired clown
No, they walked out because there was no one in authority to shut down the speaker, which translates into the couple not being in control. This is classic psychosis. They can't discern reality from happy dream. Reality threatens their mental security so they turn to abusive control to preserve their insanity.
This couple (and the others) lost the control-battle during this gathering and reacted predictably as delusional people will.
@@TXDudeyes, the idea of there being a platform publicly not subservient to their narrative is unendurable for them
They are oppressed in their minds while they enjoy the freedoms to act out and enjoy the benefit of living in America. Good job, whistleblower.
Google working hard at turning 2024 into 1984
The Google/Damore incident actually happened in 2017.
Vote Trump and fight the lies. Obama getting Biden to drop out is proof of behind the scenes dictatorship
Probably more like Harrison Bergeron by Vonnegut, but also I agree with your sentiment
They have trouble arguing because they dont have any valid points.
Those blue haired people were really upset about men being taller than women.
It’s insane that those are the kind of people that somehow had a stranglehold on corporate ideology for like 7 years.
Had? In what way is it past tense?
What you just witnessed is the minority turning violent for speaking, and why true free speech is so important, without fear of repercussions.
But that’s also free speech, the fact that someone else can get mad at what you say is free speech. Idk if you understand what free speech is. Free speech is being able to say what you want and if you can say what you want someone else can also say what they want even if it makes you feel sad, they are not the government they are another person like your self so they are exercising their free speech and if you don’t like what they say someone something else to them. Simple
@@kekie3703very true but also the liberal left is known for shutting down events at colleges just because they dont like the speaker 😂
They aren't a minority, they are a product.
You refuse to see what is right in front of you.
People who are a product of the US corporate monopoly system.
And there's going to be a LOT more of them.
@kekie3703 Wow you're disingenuous. Yes they're free to dissent but they're not free to block somebody else's speech. Think about what you're writing ffs.
@@kekie3703 Getting mad isn't free speech. And they proved it by not being able to say anything cogent.
Google's "don't be evil" did not stick.
They removed that motto
That motto was their first and it only lasted 5 minutes.
It don't be evil… and get caught.
Imagine taking a motto seriously
@@kylespevak6781 what's the point then?
Wild. Can't even talk about simple reality without people having a temper tantrum. And these kids want a seat at the adult's table? Unbelievable.
Yea thes children need to sit the fuck down and listen to their elders, they should be ashamed with acting that way.
I am female and engineer, when I was in school, there were only 3 more females on engineering program with me. It was overwhelmingly male. And as he said, for a reason. Not to be able to say that man and females are different without someone getting offended is insanity.
penn state circa 2005 -- of the entire engineering program... 2% female
Hey, I'm from India, when i was pursuing my bachelor's degree, there were 8 women in my class compared to 38 men, including myself, which is better compared to my masters degree with 15 men and 2 women.
The few women in my physics programs turned out to be the most insufferable, most overcompensating individuals too...Even when they are there, they aren't shaping up to be good scientists / engineers.
I started programming computers about 1972. Went through a trade-type school. Almost half the class was women. I read articles in trade publications describing how balanced the profession was because it didn't have a long male-dominated history like other disciplines. But over the years, more women would leave for other careers than men. It wasn't a lot, but over time it added up until there were mostly men. Then I think the word got out and fewer women pursued the field. When I earned my Master's degree, there were still a decent percent of women, though less. Where I worked, the women were accepted just like everyone else. I saw no difference. But women still drifted away at a high rate than men.
My first thought too. What % of googles work demands are from fields that have like 90% male graduation rate?
Ashamed about nothing. Offended by everything.
I liked the bit where the girl said that “even” the women INSIDE the room had been brainwashed.
I wonder if she can define the term “irony”.
that WOMAN got upset about the quote "men on average are taller, correct?" raises her hand to have an issue, walks away. why is it those people who claim to be unique always look like they are wearing a uniform? you already know their political stance, and moral compass. they have none.
That's not a woman....
It's not a woman. It's a guy trying to look more feminine.
I think it was a man, actually. Looked like a man, but weird.
Yeah, they actually want to destroy society as we know it. They are brainwashed by those who are pushing communism and socialism. I think it's a symptom of the still ongoing part of the cold war.
In a sense these are brainwashed into being traitors to their own heritage.
That was a dude
That poor man has been traumatized. He should seek relief from Google for work place harassment.
Trauma is made up
He's autistic, not traumatized. Too autistic to be traumatized. He simply learned a fact.
His firing was challenged but to no avail. Google has never admitted that they did anything wrong, and James Damore was left without fair compensation and had to move on to the next chapter in his life, which he did.
It's over now. Google committed a heinous act and paid NO price for it.
Solution is to not use google products. I only use Maps and Translate, NEVER the search engine.
If any good millionaires out there want to do good. They should find the legal actions by people like this guy to sue google to the moon.
James Damore is a democrat who has voted for and empowered evil his whole life. The logical conclusion of what democrats strive for (communism) is being reached. He is not a victim... he is Dr. Frankenstein... Of as Stalin said, a "useful idiot". This video is years old and is a repost. We could hope that James has learned he was on the wrong side and has cast all his trash democrat ideas in the garbage where they belong, but I have no idea if he has... I doubt it, but he is smart so maybe. I do know that I have ZERO sympathy for democrats who get what they voted for.
"Does anyone take offense?"
Purple hair mafia "that's our cue."
I still hold fast to my belief that this is all a conspiracy by the BIG HAIR DYE COLOR industry.
🤣
Damn straight
Big Product.
Lmao they’ve been doing great if so
I am oppresed because my hair colour is natural.
This is why the Native Americans wouldn't allow anyone under the age of 50 in the council tent.
i did not know that, but it makes perfect sense now! thanks!!
Another fact (my sister is Native American) native Americans also have the wrong issues many tribes actually eat those that they killed for multiple reasons but still. Many nations were constantly at war and acted like barbarians. Yes, they lived with one with the land and respected the land but there are some negatives. I have many Native American friends aside from my sister, and I have learned a lot in my over 50 years of life about many cultures Native Americans did the same things that of many other nations did.
@@amechealle5918 Yes from my small amount of research, the Native Americans fought/wared against one another (same as anywhere on the globe).
That's just factually not true. Maybe it's true of some tribes but by-and-large, it is flat-out false.
@@ProxyAuthenticationRequired The pre-industrial average is very largely skewed by child mortality. Fifty may have been old for them but that's the point.
“Not gonna engage in that shit”, zero valid points just foaming like a rabid animal.
I'm convinced that bright day-glo hair dye is just the 21st Century version of brown shirts and arm bands.
Exact same prejudices, tactics and reactions.
You're wrong, brown shirts and arm bands were replaced with tiki torches
@tijtij you have no grasp on history or current events
Exactly. There is malicious ideas at work here.
@@joshb6993 So you think that the people holding tiki torches chanting "Jews will not replace us" in Charlottesville are not the 21st century brown shirts? You seem as rational as the blue haired people.
dont forget the mask
Doesn’t take a whistle blower to know Google is left as f
and this is a strong reason why tech should spread out beyond California, which is corrupting it to the point where it will create enemies in the form of regulatory control. Also, California has too many NIMBYs and regulations itself to allow for the growth needed to accommodate the tech sector. Spread that wealth to other places; it should never be concentrated physically or ideologically. There is security in being spread out.
@@RM-dc6zd oh california is done. theres no "silicon" in silicon valley
@@backtoschool9760 I wish. Unfortunately it is still heavily concentrated, as is VC. You will know it’s done when the left finally gets voted out after property values fall significantly and they start begging companies to return. They are still in the denial stage.
@@backtoschool9760 There is, it's just not where you'd expect it.
It should’ve been apparent when their AI began spitting out inaccurate historical images unprompted.
I was a programmer and I never received any support from mgmt. Matter of fact, it was the opposite. P.S. I would never work for Google. Too many lawsuits for doing illegal and sneaky things.
Have you seen the compensation packages? I'd work for Google or Apple for 500k easily.
@@Zhcwumany folks are completely disinterested in money lol
I knew the blue haired one would kick off 😂
Weird colored hair and septum piercings are the lefts equivalent of SS lightning bolt tattoos and iron crosses.
When you see that, run away.
@@purdysanchez The Iron Cross has nothing to do with the SS. The Iron Cross was the highest military commendation in Germany for over 100 years before the NawtZees even existed. Also, the double lighting bolts were insignias on their uniforms, not tattoos on their skin (although, some may have gotten tattoos of it, that is neither here nor there). How can you be right and yet so wrong at the same time?
@@pigpuke, I'm referring to what the tattoos generally mean in America. Not the Historical use of them by the German military. In America these are usually prison tattoos associated with white supremacists.
Why wouldn’t she just offer a counter argument if she had one?
The blued hair creatures aren't getting enough attention...poor babies
The less attention the blue hair things get, the darker and cleaner the blue hair gets . It's usually a "transition" that starts with obnoxious light shitty blue and ends in violence once the transition to full dark blue takes place.
Colored hair is their freedom of expression, just as choosing your gender is an attempt to being free from social constructs. Is the world you want to live in one where people are afraid to express themselves?
Their hair color is a warning. Just like colorful poisonous snakes.
@@MrDavidheinemann like a pokemon, a woke one
🤮
It's not Red vs Blue, it's the rational vs irrational extremism that can be found all across the political spectrum. It's the disconnect between a simulated reality we immerse ourselves in through online "discourse" and the tangible, practical reality of interpersonal cooperation. We've become far too comfortable in our echo chambers to the point where even hearing something we dont immediately agree with has become intolerable. Such a society cannot keep itself together for very long. We have to rethink our collective relationship with social media if we want to save our nation.
Toddler-grade logic with toddler-grade tantrums.
Those 'rejectors of reality' are unhinged bullies. They have to be stopped, because they're the very last kind of people we should pander to.
"crybullies"
@@pigpuke Professional victims who weaponize their wimp behavior.
In my class of 85 males and 24 females, a company came for placements and recruits 6 females and only 2 males. Not even a single women is in top 10 and only 3 in top 20 in class.
It's a shame that these children are willing to admit that what Heather was saying was factual, but unable to come to terms with those facts 😥
As they would say-
"Feelings don't care about facts."
Well not exactly, it appears they were annoyed by downplaying of something. But when you stomp your feet we don't get to learn what exactly are you taking issue with
this must explain why their search engine gives worst results nowadays.
Try using Gemini and the bias they try to train out of people has somehow made it into their AI.
@@tacticaltruthteller It's all duckduckgo for me from now on.
@@oaim50 It sure is foul that it's come to this. Duckduckgo FTW!
@@tacticaltruthteller I know U meant fowl, but I herd ya. Onward to victory with the quack quacks! Down with monopolies!
@oaim50 lol Yes fowl! Down with monopolies! Birds of a feather flock together!
Those who walked out in response to hearing: "men are on average taller than women" should consider working on a farm and living off the gird for a week; only eating food they cultivate and/or kill. It'll help with perspective on what's important.
Fucking how exactly will that work? Can you please explain? I'm annoyed that they walked out to men being on average taller, but fail to see how a farm solves it.
@@BuckysKnifeFlip Because it will show the differences in biology.
Men are expected to be strong enough to do most of the labor in a farm and as a result bulk up, become taller.
@oompalumpus699 bulking up doesn't make you taller, though...
Microaggression is just a buzz word that means "shut up or I'll have you cancelled."
Indeed, plenty more words and terms where that came from, too. (eg. transphobic, antisemitism, extremist, conspiracy theorist)
It means "the truth is evil" and therefore it is Satanist.
All this cancelling of people is feminine and cowardly, all done from a keyboard. Microaggression is just a feminine pretend word, one of many. Behold the rot from within.
Or I can call any imperceptible movement aggression now and you're screwed
@@badadviceforfree Everything that you don't like. It's super cool.
Google is evil for firing this guy.
Shut up and let us take care of you, we can do no wrong.
HR always protects the company, not the employee.
@@hajovonta6300 I can't wrap my head around why more people have not grasped this fact. There are so many articles and documentation, even admissions from H.R. reps that they are there to mitigate Liability for the Company, not the employee. Think of a Lawyer; They represent the Organization, NOT YOU.
Misandry
they lost a good engineer
I'm training as an electrician. At trade school there were 3-4 women in my class at the beginning. Now there are 2. I never heard anything disparaging from teachers or other students. Those women never mentioned any difficulties with discrimination at work. They simply found the profession not to their liking. So already few women are interested in being electricians, and the few that are sometimes find that they don't enjoy it. This is ok!
Keep in mind, you don't have ideas this dumb without being educated into them. They're repeating what their professors have told them.
“You can’t just argue against… against fact”
Yep. Someone told them something wrong, with absolute certainty. Sociologists must be stopped, we let them think they’re real science for too long.
@@donk8961 Marxist sociologists, to be specific. And Marxists of many other disciplines. Violent disruption and "activism" is what they're about. My question is why is the teaching of this ideology being tolerated (if not promoted) by our government? Do THEY have some kind of agenda?
@aspensulphate Idiot puppets are easy to sway into voting for [insert party].
What's nefarious is that they give the illusion of an opposition as well.
There are things normal today that are so insane that they're borderline unfathomable.
@@aspensulphate - The agenda of the modern day communist is to destroy the nation and re-create a new totalitarian slave/police state (a new Soviet Union). The useful idiots (followers / NPCs) just recite the words they have been taught (the one's we see on youtube). They have been brain washed to believe they are ushering in a new era of "Social Justice, Freedom, Peace, Democracy, Liberty, etc". All communist movements start off as "Social Justice" to correct the wrong doings of the past. The end is always a brutal communist regime i.e., the USSR.
That is not education, it is re-education like totalitarian societies use to get people "right". If this bullshit gets a foothold it will then become indoctrination. If that happens, we're all screwed.
How are you offended by someone saying that men tend to be taller?
Especially since women who are attracted to men, normally want men who are taller than them?
Because when a man pretends he is a woman and someone else says the truth which refutes his identity it causes the man that is a fake woman to go into a crisis of identity which is very uncomfortable and makes him melt down. These confused people should be taken to a safe place and provided the treatment they need..
EDIT: Since some of my comments are being deleted, I'll simply incorporate them into this one going forward.
@johnabbotphotography
1. I doubt that was their sole reason for leaving. Human action is usually more nuanced.
1.1 Shortly after leaving the auditorium, they mention that this guest speaker was a "paid" guest speaker -- by student money. They may have known beforehand what his speech would entail, and simply showed up in protest.
1.2 The contents of his memo consisted of harmful stereotypes. I read some of his memo. Personally, it's largely pseudo-scientific drivel. Why? Because the studies he cites to make claims about sexual difference are not only NOT definitive, but he extrapolates from them to conflate sexual difference with gendered difference. The studies he cites do not make this conflation; they speak to sexual difference: biologically male and biologically female participants. In order to draw conclusions about gendered difference, the studies cited would need to involve participants that identify as man or woman, and as you may or may not disagree with, this is a wide spectrum. Nonetheless, studies that elucidate patterns about gender are not equivalent to those that elucidate patterns about sex.
1.3 Like most people, he doesn't grasp that the ethos, or ethics, of diversity campaigns is social justice; his memo insists on "demoralizing" diversity, effectively making it financially driven -- which would never work to commiserate those historically and institutionally discriminated against. His point of view on this particular issue can be considered malicious because it erases the very real, and targeted institutional harm that minorities and queer folk are subjected to on account of their identity, or immutable attributes, rather than talent, skill, or merit.
1.4 The woman beside him follows with a false-equivalence to the effect of 'women are shorter than men,' rather than 'males are taller than females.' It is a dogmatic framing of gender and sex, and one that attempts to erase the possibility of gender non-conformity. Furthermore, not all scientific facts are scientific law, certainly as it pertains to something as malleable and adaptable as human biology. Lastly, his memo was hardly scientific. To follow his speech with a claim about height difference between genders, as if it is factual, can be upsetting. It illustrates that the conversation is ideologically driven, and not earnest. Hope this...helps?
@markaurelius61
Everything is thoroughly intertwined. That is an ambiguous claim. The proposition here isn't whether they are intertwined, but that they a) should not be confused, and b) are distinct conceptually, and under the purview of different fields of inquiry: genetics versus psychology. You are entitled to believe that queer-identity is bad. That is the value judgement many of you operate on, for reasons only you can speak to. What I am here to share is that, regardless of it being bad: it and sex exist in different realities. No human expression can change the reality of sex. Sex is genetic, chromosomal. But language, cultural practice, and convention -- social constructs -- have always shaped gender identity, gender expression, and gender roles across several civilizations throughout human history. Edit: I should also add, if your underlying concern is population growth, or the possibility of human extinction, there are far more pressing existential threats than the self-expression of 0.002% of the global population. Climate change, economic inequality, war, pollution are more impactful areas to focus on.
They thought a man was a woman so if you challenge that by saying that men and women are real things in reality it destroys their false identity which is based on a lie.
@zasterheffor the blue-haired gentleman literally raised his hand in response to Heather's "does anyone take offense to this fact [that men, as a group, are taller than women, as a group]"? So, I think it's safe to say that he did, in fact, take issue with that basic statement of empirical truth?? (I can put question marks after affirmative statements too!)
Also, James' memo was making statements-- whether you believe them to be scientifically sound or not-- on what *is* : observing the reality of our sexual dimorphism-- both morphological and psychological-- is not necessarily a statement of what *ought* to be; e.g. if I state that women, as a sex, are more drawn to people rather than things in how they go about choosing careers, this doesn't mean that I'm also somehow implying that a woman who *does* have an aptitude and interest in robotics, for example, *shouldn't* be allowed to or encouraged to go into that field. You can't on the one hand claim that you have no issue with an empirical discussion on sex-specific differences, but then on the other hand claim that do so is to "promote harmful stereotypes".
@@sonmi2246 I made a couple comments that were censored...
I try again. Reality refutes their false identity which offends them. James was 100% right in his memo and to say otherwise is to be confused about reality like the the blue man.
These types of companies are sick. Glad Google just lost a big case in court.
The common intollerance of the people who can't explain their reactions, because they are based entirely on feelings, which stem from never being checked, or never resolving their trauma.
Especially when their "trauma" is not being as attractive, intelligent, or financially advantaged as other people .
We are not born with the same gifts and capacities, and thus, you can be equal or you can be free .Naturally, those that feel that they were born at a disadvantage are perfectly willing to give up freedom to feel that they are more equal .
Much of the sexual identity issue has it's basis in the same issues of choice; they wish to argue over or try to subvert all choices that were made without their bidding.It is an absurd obsession, that guarantees that their lives will be wasted chasing that never intended to be .
They have no "trauma" these are upper-middle class suburban kids. What? They got a green bike when they were 10 instead of a blue one and now they are traumatized? No, they are just whiney little crybullies who are used to getting their own way all the time.
@@pigpuke If they'd been born in a year 1200 native american tribe, they'd have been left behind at the first migration.
@@pigpukeagain they need to sit the fuck down
"It's all about freedom of speech" says the person who doesn't want them speaking 😅
But when it's time for the left to fuck shit up suddenly "rioting is the voice of the unheard"
When that girl said “I want to keep you safe” to the black security guard was so patronizing and insulting. These people are insane
Thanks for re-posting this Mike!
They've been doing this stuff for quite awhile now, and with zero self-awareness.
You don't understand what's happening at all... You think they have "zero self-awareness"? This implies you think they don't understand what they are doing. Surely you heard "do not underestimate your enemy"... I've been watching democrat filth for 22+yrs... They know EXACTLY what they are doing, so correct your thinking, and assume your enemy is strong not weak.
As soon as they / them say “If I were to tell you any thoughts on this event, it would be more than this event is worth”, while taking the time to attend the event, you know they have no thoughts…
That's all their dialogue is, sentiments. It's all words on how they feel but nothing in terms of decent arguments.
If there’s one thing I’ve learned during my time in Corporate America is that you can be right at the wrong time, some battles you have to know how to politically move around, diversity, women really any “woke” agenda has to be treated with care it’s often not a hill worth dying on
I guess if you can suppress your feelings, but that’s soul crushing for a lot of people. I’d rather work minimum wage than pretend the nonsense is normal. I don’t know how people go to work everyday just to pretend like this shit is all good. 🤢
I worked at Google at the time he was fired. Even though I'm liberal, a minority, it was a disgrace our CEO to ignore the valid points he raised and simply fired him for writing that memo (and latch on to a single word he used, which was OK in clinical world but not acceptable in today's woke culture).
And his motive was for diversity, just completely ignored simply because of words and people taking offense. It's as simple as hatred towards one person, and they are incredibly stupid not to see it.
What word did he use
Could you shed lights on the points he raised in the memo ?
@@sandhya2024 you can Google his memo it's posted online, it's very long and windy, maybe ask ChatGPT to summarize it. Basically it's asking why so few women chose computer science major and even fewer chose it as a profession. Unfortunately he used the wrong word
He made the explicit point as to why a growing number of individuals who side with a particular viewpoint "Can't" and "won't" speak up or be a part of the discussion due to repercussions, his fate at google was precisely the undisputed truth.
Portland State University has to have the most sheltered fools on the planet.
More accurately, Portland, Seattle, etc are hotbeds of communism. These people are this way because they have been indoctrinated by communists... this is how it's always been done. The democrat party is now the communist party. The entire education system is 100% democrat controlled... it's the first institution they captured many many decades ago. These kids parents were indoctrinated already. It's a new kind of commie revolution. And they have almost total control of the media and big tech and the government.
Sheltered = brainwashed = no dissent allowed = fascist = righteous
Are you new to seeing this nonsense? This video has been relatively tame.
The sad fact is that they will eventually receive the inevitable awakening of real life.
They are indoctrinated communists... they are taught to not listen... that's THE POINT of communist propaganda... They were taught by their professors.. probably same in K-12, and most likely their parents who were also indoctrinated in the democrat controlled education system.
0:45
“Jimmy! Jimmy! Pan the camera to the blue hair! Pan the camera to the blue- Perfect! Hold it there! That’s thumbnail worthy!… This thing is gonna get triggered. Just wait for it.”
Now imagine thinking you'd get fair treatment in such an awful company.
Yes
The company just doesn't care about equality nor inclusiveness whatsoever.
The cult got them.
The person who left, couldn't wait to be offended.
Huh? What just happened here? This feels like a trailer for a mockumentary.
Just a Thursday in the USA.
Grown adults acting like they're lack of parenting is everybody else's problem. Most people hit the bottle or do heroin but these freaks just like to tard rage in public.
Yeah, the way this is edited seems out of place for what it is.
It’s his speech at Portland State - this is the actual one I think, the cameras are just cinematic. He’s just a guy who doesn’t know when to keep to himself. People will cite this as proof that ‘conservatives are discriminated against’ while ignoring you can be fired for anything here.
@@w4terbucket I wasn’t asking for a literal explanation. It was a question asked as a result of being flabbergasted by what is happening.
I remember this guy and this incident. He spoke at Portalnd State University about what happened while I was living in that nut hell hole of a city. It was the start of my awakening. I left portland shortly after and have never been happier and so grateful.
It seems like nobody really cares that he received a physical threat, maybe because he's a man? Yet, the one who disagreed acted violently.
Those kids at the end can't even conjure basic language to defend their positions because I think they know somewhere deep down that their positions are indefensible.
I forgot about this guy!!!! He has a point about being able to bring your self to work as conservative or Christian. While see progressive ideas implemented and room made for Islam, we see the majority of working class in ideas and beliefs repressed!!!
Imagine the blue haired one being forced to adhere to the hijab.
How are Christians oppressed in the workplaces of America?
The fact that there are so many people who walked out after hearing facts terrifies me. The comment about the rejection of reality is something they really need to think on. They really just proved his point so well though. People like that will not listen to reason.
The brainwashed are claiming others are brainwashed. 😂
applaud this man - he should be head of diversity at google
No, he should be head of "hiring and firing" while DEI is defunded and removed from existence. THEN, he should be hired as an engineer so he can then solve problems that aren't common sense, basic reality and that he actually enjoys doing (which is what he wanted to do in the first place).
No. Someone who is head of dei should not even exist
"Diversity" shouldn't exist at all in society. Not as a "department" or agency, anyway, and by-and-large not in society itself as it has been repeatedly proven by history that "diverse" cities and states collapse due to in-fighting, not external forces.
Tolerance for me, but not for thee. Ditto for freedom of speech.
this 'google memo' thing, was the moment I woke up. I actually read it before I knew the nature of the controversy, hadn't heard any editorializing, found it to be ... a non issue, then I kept hearing how the media was spinning it, went back and read it again, because I must have been missing something... nope. All I saw was ideological intolerance from activists and journalists
Everyone has their 'moment' of seeing that I think
Now you need to look closer... it's NOT "ideological intolerance from activists and journalists". These people are this way because they have been indoctrinated by communists... this is how it's always been done. The democrat party is now the communist party. The entire education system is 100% democrat controlled... it's the first institution they captured many many decades ago. These kids parents were indoctrinated already. It's a new kind of commie revolution. And they have almost total control of the media and big tech and the government. You aren't totally wrong, it's virtue-signaling... you just need to zoom out and see the bigger picture... it's much worse than you think.
@@nicknomski8399not everyone
What makes it to the headlines or sound bites or snippets of video presented to the public through media channels is usually altered, filtered, framed, or spun.
The raw video, raw interviews, raw text, raw events if recorded are always much more detailed, nuanced, or otherwise accurate. They just are not summarized or concise, so the job fell onto editors to choose what's important for the audience.
Originally, journalism formed as a decent profession with ethics and honor to the truth, not to agendas or biases, but much of that has been eroded away with the long-term daily grind of agendas causing attrition, the ratings boon of political framing, inserting commentary, spinning the events to match an ideology, or omitting/downplaying certain aspects to make the events fit into the boxes they want.
@@Hexnilium - It's called Communist propaganda.
Wow! No discussion. Just tantrums. What happened to this generation?
Ideological Subversion - check out the 1985 interview with former KGB Yuri Brezmenov.
They grow up super spoiled
Its everyone in the US, their egos are out of control
@@SernivalCommunist ideology combined with American ego and irrationality is a danger.
No father
I’ve been in the software business since the late 90s. Women do not like tech. They like using it, but they don’t like developing it. Why is this such a bad thing?
Imagine the mental sickness of a powerful group behind the scenes who would want to engineer a culture of young people to think this way. That's the only way these ideas could come to have more importance than facts and reality itself to large amounts of people. Nothing natural about this phenomenon, it has been willfully engineered into society.
Do religions need "a powerful group behind the scenes" with "mental sickness" to bring them into existence/prominence?
No.
Now, this particular faith does have a fairly powerful group pushing it, but one that is very much NOT behind the scenes. Academics and educational administrators.
If you are alleging any other conspiracy, show me the evidence, otherwise you're just a conspiracy theorist.
Folie à one
Folie à deux
Folie à.. manyyyyy (Yassss!)
We don't need to imagine it, it's not new. These people are this way because they have been indoctrinated by communists... this is how it's always been done. The democrat party is now the communist party. The entire education system is 100% democrat controlled... it's the first institution they captured many many decades ago. These kids parents were indoctrinated already. It's a new kind of commie revolution. And they have almost total control of the media and big tech and the government.
They don't actually care about creating a more inclusive workplace. They do this to create an authoritarian culture where people are afraid to go against management and to not get sued. This is such an annoying culture and I experienced it at school. All the kids who enjoy power tripping go up to you and make you do some performative gesture in the name of tolerance.
Many people felt the same way about Woodstock and the sex drugs and rock and roll culture that appeared out of nowhere in the 60s. A lot of similarities in how the culture shifted. After Charles Manson exposed the evil behind that rhetoric, culture calmed down for a while. We're back at it again, just with some modern twists.
Blue haired crybaby made me sick because of how much they wanted to 'blame and run'. Anyone can run off and be a crybaby during a fight. Warriors stand their ground. You have to stand and fight. No respect for that individual.
They? It was one person with blue hair
I'm not surprised by the appearance of the hecklers.
The ugly side of the binary squad was out in full force for this one.
Is there a pretty side?
@@Denniss7420 Nope just some people that their parents failed in raising them properly. They are the examples why you need to take an interest in your child’s life.
You can always see the derangement in their eyes.
I remember discussing this firing in my business ethics class. I made some statement about how the exact demographics of a job are rarely going to exactly match the demographics of the population, and that it’s not necessarily racism or sexism causing that.
Some woman in the class claimed that sexism was why less women are in software engineering jobs.
I asked her why she wasn’t majoring comp-sci.
🤷♂️
Oh I love that.
"Sexism is why women aren't in STEM!"
"So why aren't you in comp sci right now?"
😂
So much money and effort has gone into bringing girls and women into Comp Sci. And the ratios stay the same. I guess they need to force these obstinate women to do what's good for them. You will code, ladies!
Thanks Mike for reposting this as unfortunately this is still a current situation.
No worries. Plenty of recent interest in the political ghost in Google's search engine. It's relevant again because it seems so few people understand how deep it all runs and for how long. www.michaelnayna.com/p/gemini-is-a-committee
@@MikeNaynaGod bless you 🙏
@@MikeNaynabut we understand the impact it is having on the wider society. From a distance it looks like generational facism as a reaction to being barred from economic resources. Housing, jobs, family etc. I am 63.
If that blue haired creature had a thought it would be lonely.
Google’s motto: PRETEND to do no evil.
Obviously some folks are unmedicated.
Or over medicated
0:45 the cameraman panning over to the blue hair and headphones fucking killed me😂
Google---whose original motto was, "Don't Be Evil", understandably changed that motto when they started being evil.
That was removed with the alphabet restructuring
"My thoughts?" It has no thoughts, only feelings.
Notice how when he asks it "What are your thoughts" and it seems confused by that question as if it couldn't understand the context and had to be further clarified about what just happened less than 3 minutes ago. These people truly live in an alternate reality and can't seem to put two and two together.
@@morpheusjones4384 Exactly! That pause after it said "My thoughts?" tells you all you need to know.
The fact you are referring to the creature as "it" (gender-neutral, of course) rather than "they" (grammatically incorrect) is great. Much easier to follow along than using a plural pronoun for an individual 😂
@@bofa722 Thank you! When an intelligent living creature, a coyote for instance, wanders through my yard and I don't know its gender, "it" is perfectly acceptable. I don't see why the same shouldn't hold for humans. Pronoun problem solved!
@@bucc5207 agreed. Even one of my English language professors in uni who's very liberal said it was complete garbage and a butchering of the English language lol
I cackled when the Cookie Monster stood up
This is hilarious! Colour hair always gives them away. They can't even see how stupid they come across!
no mirrors in the home
aposomatic hair. 😂
Years ago, like 2007, 2008, before blue hair thing had become SO prevalent, we were walking down the Main Street of in a little village in Upstate NY. Along came a trio of teenagers. The girl in the middle had a fresh color of REALLY intense ROYAL BLUE hair. As they walked toward, and past us, they seemed to be discussing their financial situations and the difficulty of getting a job, and the blue-haired girl, said, "I just don't understand why no one will take me seriously!" Oh, boy.
What a shocker. Portland state students offended by facts
Criminal corruption
How to Be Offended 101....at a college near you!