One part to note is if you lose combat and your unit strength is doubled you auto break no dice (baring any dwarf special rules) So if you end up in any flanked combats or are whittled down eventually dwarves will break still.
It’s so nice seeing Matt’s tomb kings. Growing up with their videos you have a love for their respective armies, mine are his TK, tyranids and necrons. When I get my old world stuff, I’m going to do a month challenge like Matt did when necrons got their revamp.
I might be incorrect, but I believe you are doing the loss of supporting attacks incorrectly. It says specifically "a model cannot fight during a phase in which it stepped forward into the *fighting rank*, regardless of its Initiative." So the models that stepped up would lose their attacks, but the models that replaced those models would be able to make supporting attacks, since they aren't in the fighting rank. Not sure, since obviously the game hasn't fully come out yet
Yeah after seeing all the reports that came out this weekend (5-6 of them), that's the one thing that strikes me the most. It's full of back and forth, and the game is never called early. Really like that.
"I cannot go first" is a common misconception . The opponent chooses if he goes first or not and if he chooses the bretonnians to go first, then they still have the blessing.
An easier way to explain the new morale. You can fail, succeed, or partial succeed. You succeed if you roll under your modified leadership. You fail if you roll over your unmodified leadership. You get a partial success and do the new thing if you roll higher than your modified but lower than your unmodified.
If I'm understanding it correctly that's incorrect. Combat res doesn't modify leadership but things like terror or spells do. Therefore rolling over modified leadership does break you (for example rolling 9 on dwarfs when faced with terror which reduces ld by 1). You obviously understand it but it's not as simple to explain. It's basically: Succeed old normal break test -> you hold. fail old normal break test -> you fall back fail with old stubborn -> you break
@@jajaxaxa I feel like that's being fairly pedantic. There's a reason that we specify when something modifies your leadership characteristic rather than specifying that somebody is modifying your morale check, most people collogially just refer to morale as "leadership" checks because they're a subset of leadership checks. Like if you take my exact post and change only the words "modified leadership" to "morale check" it fits your criteria; I just think it's less grokable for the typical warhammer player. You want to call out the fact that it's the modified version, I.E. combat modifiers. *Edit to add* or "Break test" or whatever they've chosen to call it in this edition, the specific test this is that is post combat rest previously referred to as a morale test in some editions.
@@garbagecan755 You're right, it's absolutely pedantic. I was kind of just pointing out that the reason Steve and Matthew were having problems explaining it is because they wanted to explain it correctly to the smallest detail. That's why they were tripping up. As I said, you obviously understand how it works.
Steve's explanation of combat resultion (47:17) is good, but if you still prefer Matthew's perspective, there is an equivalent method: After losing combat by a margin of X, you roll a leadership test against your *unmodified* leadership. 1. If you fail, you break. 2. If you pass the test, but by less than X, you fall back in good order. 3. If you pass by X or more, you give ground. So in the first combat, Steve lost by 3 and had an unmodified leadership of 6. If he rolls more than 6, he breaks. If he rolls between 4 and 6 (passes, but by a margin of less than 3), he falls back in good order. If he rolls 3 or less, he gives ground. Edit: unmodified means not modified by X, it can be modified by other factors of course.
You can always use other models. I am planning to buy some Victrix vikings for Marauders. They are cheap and great looking. If GW wants me to play their games they need to look at their price first. ^^*
Great battle report guys! Much better than the first one on MWG, probably as you are learning the intricacies of the new rules. Great to see Matt at it with a fantasy army too! This showcased what the Tomb Kings can do much better, feeling better about their power level now.
shout out to Matt: I'm still using your intro video which you made with Dark elf and Skeleton, a decade ago, to welcome new people into the world of fantasy, the only way Warhammer should be played.
Number one Rule I've seen every BatRep fail so far: If you Fall Back in Good Order (or would) but are outnumbered Unit Strength 2 to 1, you Flee. So at the end, both the Knight and the Duke would actually Flee. This is how you break Units in The Old World, yes they can Break via badly failing the Break Test but Leaderships are much higher in this Edition. Just trying to mention since it was done incorrectly but is HUGE for playing the game.
Nice report, and good to see the TK being played a little more successfully. Other videos I've seen have completely failed to take into account having to play differently against Brettonians! However, you are making the break tests way more complicated than they need to be. If you roll under modified leadership: Give ground. If you roll under your unmodified: Fall back in good order. If you roll over your leadership: Break. You can explain it the other way round too, if you prefer. :p
Soooo much fun, I havent had this much fun watching a battle report in which someone else appeared to be genuinely having a great time in......I guess, going on 10 years now. I seriously hope this game comes back strong and is here to stay!
Sooo much nostalgia tingling down my spine right now! I remember starting to watch the MWG WH Fantasy BattlesBatreps back in the days when you guys still had the shop. Those were awesome. Hope to see more stuff like this in the future from all of you guys
I'm enjoying this but i needed to pause to say that the two of you have probably managed to give the least clear explanation of break tests that will ever exist. Well done! 😂 Right, back to the video.
Thanks for the game, great fun! That skeleton unit should have given ground after that round of combat against the Duke and the knights, then the tomb guard would not have been able to charge the knights in the back, though.
Man, you guys really complicated the explanation of the break test. xD Three tiers: rolling under modified Ld, rolling between modified Ld and base Ld, and rolling over base Ld.
So the Lance has changed? If I remember correctly, in the last editions the lance increased the number of models the Bretts could bring in without increasing the width of the unit - so a 6-knight lance (1+2+3) would be considered a 3-model wide unit but 5 knights would be considered in combat. So in the Chariot vs Lance + Foot-troops combat all 3 chariots would be in combat vs all 6 knights.
Hey Steve. One thing I wanted to point out, cause it seems like it makes quite the difference. So, I was watching the battle report that Warhammer + put out, and in it the one guys Duke was in a challenge and even though he killed the guy he was fighting, he still did the rest of his pegasus’ attacks and its stomps cause those seem to still count towards combat rez. Just wanted to point you towards that as that could’ve made a difference for you in this one. Regardless, great batrep and loving the Old World!!!
Combat at 1:12:34 - horsemen vs men at arms. Shouldn't the horsemen have counted as having charged as they followed up after the peasants fell back in good order?
Great battle report guys, I did have 1 question. Is Fear still in the game or did the mechanics for it change? Might have missed it if it was already addressed in the video.
Heads-up dudes - from what I saw from the maneuvers page, you can wheel multiple times in a move (you just can't mix maneuvers). And Lumbering makes you close order but also get a free pivot after moving (if you didn't charge/march). So the bone giant (and really any unit) CAN wheel multiple times. Just needs to spend the movement to do it.
It is good to see some things streamlined and toned down from 8th. Somethings still seem a bit rough for new players or those of us that haven't played in years.
its fascinating how varied the tomb kings range is after all the relases they've ha over the years the bretonians by contrast only have units they had in 5th.
I gotta say. The combat resolution is very simple. Roll the dice compared to Ld, fail=flee If you pass, modify the dice by the CR value, if this would cause you to fail, you fall back in good order. That’s it guys, that’s the whole thing, just use the raw dice for the flee test, then modify them for the fallback test.
Great to watch, and the armies look excellent. Can’t wait for more Old World. One thing to note is that I’m pretty sure the Duke should have always been issuing challenges, because of his Grail Vow.
So the wh report got it right that the flammable rule prevents Regen. And there's a number of TK units with flammable/dry as dust. I'm wondering if they were going off a slightly different ruleset where the whole army has flammable.
great batrep, something that I think you both missed was the casket giving a 12" aura of +1 to cast for the priest and ALL (friend or foe) bound spells including his own so that may have swung a few casts on the TK side by +1 and got them off, but still very good batrep regardless
@@lukapavicevic335 just checked a page view, its any model friend or foe, not other so yea it would effect it. it does say of A not this model so you cannot stack 2 caskets together to get +2 but still would give the inbuilt bound spells to a +4 instead of +3 and makes the hirophant a +5 to cast in range before items so...yea
So a bit confused, in the beginning I was under the impression that instead of rolling to see who goes first, if your bretonnia you can give up your roll and instead get the blessing of the lady. Instead you rolled, rolled again after a tie, then when you lost did blessing of the lady?
Do Questing Knights re-roll Terror tests too? Also, I am pretty sure that the men-at-arms should have taken a fear check for the Skeleton Cavalry in round 3 - they might have suffered an additional -1 to hit. Cool battle though. I enjoyed it.
Hmm a devil core being the light of the lord in the ark, how interesting. Gold is close to lead... what are its radition blocking properties? Steve may be onto something, maybe minus the future thing.
Ha! I remember that discussion they had about the Casket of Souls: 'that was inspired by Indiana Jones'. 'No you millennial, that's from the bible!' :D
I think how stepping up works for Lance Formation might need to be FAQ'd; since all of the models on the sides count as being in base contact, you could argue that it's the guy in the back center that steps up to take any of their places not one of the ones in the second rank.
I've not read the rules. It should work as is, but an FAQ could help stop arguments if people are being silly. You are either removing something "in base contact" or something not in base contact. You lose attacks for removing models not "in base contact". You don't lose any attacks for "base contact" models removed, as it won't have been counted as an attacking model.
@@Yasmirr these rules makes no sense anyway, better mix some of the good stuff with the good old rules (unless it is better explained in the rulebook, but for now on every video i've watched this rule is just painful to watch and nobody knows what's correct)
Going from what I remember of old Warhammer Fantasy, don't Sepulchral Stalkers have a ranged attack they could have used at 39mins into the video or did I miss that? Edit: Nevermind, they figured that out at 1hr17mins.
great video but I need to say I absolutely despise the dice Steve is using, SKULLS ARE ONES NOT SIXES. It's not really that big of a deal but I still don't like it ):
I've watched several old world battle reports and I'm learning that ranged units are absolute garbage. Just shot with 32 archers and 2 trebuchets and caused 1 wound. Like would the points not be better spent on just more knights or infantry or something thats actually going to contribute?
When you were talking Indiana Jones, I took some time to reflect that I’ve been watching you all forever. Ever want a guest dwarf general (to be fair new edition I’d paint something new) to swing through for a game… 🤙📲
Absolutely. You don't even have to print anything. Just a blank piece of paper, a ruler and a pen/pencil -- create your own grid with the correct base size in 15 seconds voila, a perfect tool for figuring out everything template related.
So awesome! I made a huge order for a Big Tomb Kings Army. Im really excited!❤ thanks for the Battlereport Guys! 1.22.10😂Tomb Three for the Turn Kings!
You don't get the blessing if you choose to roll for initiative, because by doing so you have gone passed the stage to declare you are praying. It stops Bret players cheating and only declaring to pray once they have lost the initiative.
![Run Away - Tzuyu(TWICE) ツウィ 쯔위 [Music Bank] | KBS WORLD TV 240906](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KnHNNyAYiu0/mqdefault.jpg)
This was actually a much better battle report than the one you two did on the miniwargaming page. You just seemed to have so much more fun with this.
Those knights are beautifully painted; I particularly liked Sir Alph Alegion.
The new combat resolution means dwarfs are literally never going to break... which I guess is pretty thematic!
@@grlmgormakes up for the great initiative and no step up.
One part to note is if you lose combat and your unit strength is doubled you auto break no dice (baring any dwarf special rules) So if you end up in any flanked combats or are whittled down eventually dwarves will break still.
The number of Brett-Onions in the AI intro is fantastic
It’s so nice seeing Matt’s tomb kings. Growing up with their videos you have a love for their respective armies, mine are his TK, tyranids and necrons. When I get my old world stuff, I’m going to do a month challenge like Matt did when necrons got their revamp.
I might be incorrect, but I believe you are doing the loss of supporting attacks incorrectly. It says specifically "a model cannot fight during a phase in which it stepped forward into the *fighting rank*, regardless of its Initiative." So the models that stepped up would lose their attacks, but the models that replaced those models would be able to make supporting attacks, since they aren't in the fighting rank. Not sure, since obviously the game hasn't fully come out yet
That was one heck of a battle. Glad this new edition made it such a back and forth without making it look like a one sided affair after 2 turns
Yeah after seeing all the reports that came out this weekend (5-6 of them), that's the one thing that strikes me the most. It's full of back and forth, and the game is never called early.
Really like that.
"I cannot go first" is a common misconception . The opponent chooses if he goes first or not and if he chooses the bretonnians to go first, then they still have the blessing.
An easier way to explain the new morale. You can fail, succeed, or partial succeed. You succeed if you roll under your modified leadership. You fail if you roll over your unmodified leadership. You get a partial success and do the new thing if you roll higher than your modified but lower than your unmodified.
If I'm understanding it correctly that's incorrect. Combat res doesn't modify leadership but things like terror or spells do. Therefore rolling over modified leadership does break you (for example rolling 9 on dwarfs when faced with terror which reduces ld by 1). You obviously understand it but it's not as simple to explain.
It's basically:
Succeed old normal break test -> you hold.
fail old normal break test -> you fall back
fail with old stubborn -> you break
@@jajaxaxa I feel like that's being fairly pedantic. There's a reason that we specify when something modifies your leadership characteristic rather than specifying that somebody is modifying your morale check, most people collogially just refer to morale as "leadership" checks because they're a subset of leadership checks. Like if you take my exact post and change only the words "modified leadership" to "morale check" it fits your criteria; I just think it's less grokable for the typical warhammer player. You want to call out the fact that it's the modified version, I.E. combat modifiers.
*Edit to add* or "Break test" or whatever they've chosen to call it in this edition, the specific test this is that is post combat rest previously referred to as a morale test in some editions.
@@garbagecan755 You're right, it's absolutely pedantic. I was kind of just pointing out that the reason Steve and Matthew were having problems explaining it is because they wanted to explain it correctly to the smallest detail. That's why they were tripping up. As I said, you obviously understand how it works.
Steve's explanation of combat resultion (47:17) is good, but if you still prefer Matthew's perspective, there is an equivalent method:
After losing combat by a margin of X, you roll a leadership test against your *unmodified* leadership.
1. If you fail, you break.
2. If you pass the test, but by less than X, you fall back in good order.
3. If you pass by X or more, you give ground.
So in the first combat, Steve lost by 3 and had an unmodified leadership of 6. If he rolls more than 6, he breaks. If he rolls between 4 and 6 (passes, but by a margin of less than 3), he falls back in good order. If he rolls 3 or less, he gives ground.
Edit: unmodified means not modified by X, it can be modified by other factors of course.
The break down at 42:00 was EXCELLENT and well explained- I never thought about the stepping up supporting attacks being lost as well! Fun batrep
We still thinking that this is correct?
Stiv, hell of a job on the Brettonnians man.
I'm so excited for the old world! But alas...I cannot afford it. But at least I have this channel to satisfy my nostalgic needs!
You can always use other models. I am planning to buy some Victrix vikings for Marauders. They are cheap and great looking. If GW wants me to play their games they need to look at their price first. ^^*
Great battle report guys! Much better than the first one on MWG, probably as you are learning the intricacies of the new rules. Great to see Matt at it with a fantasy army too! This showcased what the Tomb Kings can do much better, feeling better about their power level now.
Awesome Work guys. Love seeing Matthew involved and hearing all your plans. Can't wait for more old world!
shout out to Matt: I'm still using your intro video which you made with Dark elf and Skeleton, a decade ago, to welcome new people into the world of fantasy, the only way Warhammer should be played.
Hmm I like the new give ground thing, makes the battle more fluid.
Huzzaah! The real and original Warhammer is back!
Number one Rule I've seen every BatRep fail so far: If you Fall Back in Good Order (or would) but are outnumbered Unit Strength 2 to 1, you Flee. So at the end, both the Knight and the Duke would actually Flee. This is how you break Units in The Old World, yes they can Break via badly failing the Break Test but Leaderships are much higher in this Edition.
Just trying to mention since it was done incorrectly but is HUGE for playing the game.
Nice report, and good to see the TK being played a little more successfully. Other videos I've seen have completely failed to take into account having to play differently against Brettonians!
However, you are making the break tests way more complicated than they need to be.
If you roll under modified leadership: Give ground.
If you roll under your unmodified: Fall back in good order.
If you roll over your leadership: Break.
You can explain it the other way round too, if you prefer. :p
Soooo much fun, I havent had this much fun watching a battle report in which someone else appeared to be genuinely having a great time in......I guess, going on 10 years now. I seriously hope this game comes back strong and is here to stay!
Awesome, while watching this, I scored the Bret box, the Forces of Fantasy, the Bret Arcane Journal, and the BSB on pegasus!
What a treat to see Matthew playing a game!! Epic armies and paint jobs...
Sooo much nostalgia tingling down my spine right now! I remember starting to watch the MWG WH Fantasy BattlesBatreps back in the days when you guys still had the shop. Those were awesome. Hope to see more stuff like this in the future from all of you guys
I'm enjoying this but i needed to pause to say that the two of you have probably managed to give the least clear explanation of break tests that will ever exist.
Well done! 😂
Right, back to the video.
Please play some Wood Elves with The Old World rules. Love these.
Thanks for the game, great fun! That skeleton unit should have given ground after that round of combat against the Duke and the knights, then the tomb guard would not have been able to charge the knights in the back, though.
Man, you guys really complicated the explanation of the break test. xD
Three tiers: rolling under modified Ld, rolling between modified Ld and base Ld, and rolling over base Ld.
lol yup!
Minute 57, love seeing the new step-up and the implications
So the Lance has changed? If I remember correctly, in the last editions the lance increased the number of models the Bretts could bring in without increasing the width of the unit - so a 6-knight lance (1+2+3) would be considered a 3-model wide unit but 5 knights would be considered in combat. So in the Chariot vs Lance + Foot-troops combat all 3 chariots would be in combat vs all 6 knights.
Hey Steve. One thing I wanted to point out, cause it seems like it makes quite the difference. So, I was watching the battle report that Warhammer + put out, and in it the one guys Duke was in a challenge and even though he killed the guy he was fighting, he still did the rest of his pegasus’ attacks and its stomps cause those seem to still count towards combat rez. Just wanted to point you towards that as that could’ve made a difference for you in this one. Regardless, great batrep and loving the Old World!!!
Combat at 1:12:34 - horsemen vs men at arms. Shouldn't the horsemen have counted as having charged as they followed up after the peasants fell back in good order?
I thought the same! Maybe because the distance was too short?
Luka you are a king for that WoW reference
A big narrative Warhammer campaign! I am so here for it.
Great battle report guys, I did have 1 question. Is Fear still in the game or did the mechanics for it change? Might have missed it if it was already addressed in the video.
Heads-up dudes - from what I saw from the maneuvers page, you can wheel multiple times in a move (you just can't mix maneuvers). And Lumbering makes you close order but also get a free pivot after moving (if you didn't charge/march). So the bone giant (and really any unit) CAN wheel multiple times. Just needs to spend the movement to do it.
It is good to see some things streamlined and toned down from 8th. Somethings still seem a bit rough for new players or those of us that haven't played in years.
My first Mountain Miniatures YT video. Immediately thought - 'They've recruited Epic Voice Guy!'. Subbed.
Did skeletons forget to fall back all those times they lost combat and crumbled?
when you indirect fire with a trebuchet do you still remove ballistic skill? I'm getting conflicting information from different channels.
1:07:40 actually, all 10 where hit (well, on 4+ anyway 😅). Just because 3" is simply more than 75mm sum of the size of the bases of the archers 😘
What a blast from the past I remember Matt playing the TK years and years ago
So glad I was able to spend way too much on all the stuff I wanted! Had to use two different stores, but im good!
That step up rule for close combat looks like a kind of pain to keep track of.
I love how Steve is such a good sport no matter how the game is going, he just loves it and I love that about him.
Flaming attacks was preventing regeneration abilities on warhammer tv's battle report
Rules specifically say flaming attacks only negate regeneration if the model has the "flammable" rule.
I'll trust MM over Warhammer channel any day of the week
Suffering through a bad case of the flu, and I really appreciate all the Old World / Fantasy content yall continued to produce!
its fascinating how varied the tomb kings range is after all the relases they've ha over the years
the bretonians by contrast only have units they had in 5th.
I gotta say.
The combat resolution is very simple.
Roll the dice compared to Ld, fail=flee
If you pass, modify the dice by the CR value, if this would cause you to fail, you fall back in good order.
That’s it guys, that’s the whole thing, just use the raw dice for the flee test, then modify them for the fallback test.
The voice over for the armies at the start was brilliant 😂.
Only thing better than the paint job on the Knights is the voiceover at the beginning.
Heck yeah baby. This is what we have been waiting for 🎉
Great to watch, and the armies look excellent. Can’t wait for more Old World. One thing to note is that I’m pretty sure the Duke should have always been issuing challenges, because of his Grail Vow.
That movie wasnt called Indiana Jones at all!
It is Raiders of The Lost Ark
So did GW screw up with their battle report and not getting regeneration from the brettonian flaming arrow attacks?
So the wh report got it right that the flammable rule prevents Regen. And there's a number of TK units with flammable/dry as dust.
I'm wondering if they were going off a slightly different ruleset where the whole army has flammable.
Oh my dayz didn't realise TOW was being released so soon!
great batrep, something that I think you both missed was the casket giving a 12" aura of +1 to cast for the priest and ALL (friend or foe) bound spells including his own so that may have swung a few casts on the TK side by +1 and got them off, but still very good batrep regardless
The casket only effects OTHER wizards/bound items I believe.
@@lukapavicevic335 just checked a page view, its any model friend or foe, not other so yea it would effect it. it does say of A not this model so you cannot stack 2 caskets together to get +2 but still would give the inbuilt bound spells to a +4 instead of +3 and makes the hirophant a +5 to cast in range before items so...yea
Great to see TK being played to their full potential instead of getting stomped every other batrep hahaha
So a bit confused, in the beginning I was under the impression that instead of rolling to see who goes first, if your bretonnia you can give up your roll and instead get the blessing of the lady. Instead you rolled, rolled again after a tie, then when you lost did blessing of the lady?
Cool to see someone with GW Store Opening Dice!
I stopped using mine. They were super unlucky and I wondered if there was a weighting issue?
Fore the leadership check test for CR on Brackets I would refer to it as Succeed Leadership, Fail Leadership; Pass with Modifiers (middle bracket)
Why does the chariot make supporting attacks? Doesnt all the "front rank" get to fight?
Steve pranking Matt there at the end, poor Matt haha
Do Questing Knights re-roll Terror tests too? Also, I am pretty sure that the men-at-arms should have taken a fear check for the Skeleton Cavalry in round 3 - they might have suffered an additional -1 to hit. Cool battle though. I enjoyed it.
I cannot imagine that the step up thing should work this way. To me it‘s 10 models who could fight, minus the models that died.
I think a good way of explaining after combat could be like passing in blood bowl, order would be
Pass
Fail with modifier
Fail
Hmm a devil core being the light of the lord in the ark, how interesting. Gold is close to lead... what are its radition blocking properties? Steve may be onto something, maybe minus the future thing.
Ha! I remember that discussion they had about the Casket of Souls: 'that was inspired by Indiana Jones'. 'No you millennial, that's from the bible!' :D
What kind of basing material is that? Pumice gel? it looks pretty consistent and great
Well sir, these are all 3d printed bases with the texture already on them. Check them out here:
miniwargamingforge.com/collections/bases
Did not men at arms have the warband rule, so their leadership should be 6+2 ranks in that combat in minute 47???
I think how stepping up works for Lance Formation might need to be FAQ'd; since all of the models on the sides count as being in base contact, you could argue that it's the guy in the back center that steps up to take any of their places not one of the ones in the second rank.
I've not read the rules. It should work as is, but an FAQ could help stop arguments if people are being silly.
You are either removing something "in base contact" or something not in base contact. You lose attacks for removing models not "in base contact". You don't lose any attacks for "base contact" models removed, as it won't have been counted as an attacking model.
I doubt they way it is played is as intended. Not being able to fight with the second rank with spears when the first rank dies makes no sense
@@Yasmirr these rules makes no sense anyway, better mix some of the good stuff with the good old rules (unless it is better explained in the rulebook, but for now on every video i've watched this rule is just painful to watch and nobody knows what's correct)
Huzzah! This plus managed to order a starter set - sadly no BSB or Damsel but I'll get one eventually!
This edition seems fun. Might have to sell a kidney to get back into Fantasy.
55:48 is wrong, all 3 chariots are in base contact with the lance.
Great looking game. Where did the mat come from?
Man those rules are overcomplicated... Nostalgia is strong but still.
Going from what I remember of old Warhammer Fantasy, don't Sepulchral Stalkers have a ranged attack they could have used at 39mins into the video or did I miss that?
Edit: Nevermind, they figured that out at 1hr17mins.
Who did the army list voiceover?
A.I.
@@Fenristhegreat VO is George
I'm confused is this mini wargaming? Or did they separate and this is a new channel?
What dice is Steve using?
great video but I need to say I absolutely despise the dice Steve is using, SKULLS ARE ONES NOT SIXES.
It's not really that big of a deal but I still don't like it ):
Everyone complaining about the ai voice…i liked it and wouldn’t have mind a full coverage in that
Can matt come back to play some more games in the future? :)
I love old world so far! But what about fear tests?
I think you have to outnumber to cause fear.
Ooooooohhhhh right! Thanks @@Luciusthestorms
I've watched several old world battle reports and I'm learning that ranged units are absolute garbage. Just shot with 32 archers and 2 trebuchets and caused 1 wound. Like would the points not be better spent on just more knights or infantry or something thats actually going to contribute?
When you were talking Indiana Jones, I took some time to reflect that I’ve been watching you all forever. Ever want a guest dwarf general (to be fair new edition I’d paint something new) to swing through for a game… 🤙📲
So impetous is worse than frenzy now?
great tip with the grid but could you not just print out a grid to us? same effect but without paying for those trays which are like $70 AUD :(
Absolutely. You don't even have to print anything. Just a blank piece of paper, a ruler and a pen/pencil -- create your own grid with the correct base size in 15 seconds voila, a perfect tool for figuring out everything template related.
So awesome! I made a huge order for a Big Tomb Kings Army. Im really excited!❤ thanks for the Battlereport Guys!
1.22.10😂Tomb Three for the Turn Kings!
Matt complicated the new leadership test rule. it is so simple.
Nice battle but I started to get some motion sickness 15 minutes in with all the camera movement.
What was the little arrow device Steve used please?
Is it possible to 'reserve' move into combat or does it have to be wrote? Thinking about the scorpion. Ps where are all the dispel scrolls? 😂
Super fun battle report! Thanks😀
hes not flammable? hes made of 1000 year old bones...
A model that steps up into a supporting rank can still fight, can't it?
they can not
Hi,
How many knights can you have in a lance formation?
Only six or can you still have max 10 knights?
I've seen a different battle report with 10.
Did you guys custom print your own spell cards or are they going to be retail items?
Retail Items! Though you will want to Sleeve them, they are not the BEST quality.
@@lukapavicevic335Oh snap, guess my preorder just got a bit larger. Thanks, Luka!
You don't get the blessing if you choose to roll for initiative, because by doing so you have gone passed the stage to declare you are praying. It stops Bret players cheating and only declaring to pray once they have lost the initiative.
Loving the return of WFB!