ATSC 3.0 DRM News: Zapperbox, HDHomerun updates, no plans for in-home streaming and more
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 май 2024
- See more on this topic: • ATSC 3.0 TV Patent Fig... - It's been a few weeks since I've done an update on the status of ATSC 3.0 DRM. The good news is that more and more consumers are letting the FCC know their thoughts, but the bad news is that broadcasters continue their efforts to encrypt over the air television. It's becoming increasingly clear they never had a plan for in-home streaming and other gateway functions.
Link to the FCC Docket: lon.tv/fccinstructions
Petition Link: lon.tv/atsc3petition
VIDEO INDEX:
00:00 - Intro
00:41 - Status of our petition and docket campaign
02:04 - ASTC 3.0 Comes to New York City - With DRM
02:39 - ATSC 3.0 in 10 million devices by holiday 2023?
03:52 - Antennaman Discovers Many DRM Devices Don't Work
04:24 - DVR Rules Released by the A3SA
07:26 - Zapperbox DRM Update
10:11 - Industry Regulation Worse than the Government!
11:32 - HDhomerun update
13:01 - Where we're currently at with ATSC 3
14:31 - Why Broadcaster Scripps bailed on ATSC 3 for the Tablo 4th Gen
17:10 - What about the FCC?
18:33 - Conclusion
Visit my Blog! blog.lon.tv
Subscribe to my email lists!
Weekly Breakdown of Posted Videos: - lon.tv/email
Daily Email From My Blog Posts! lon.tv/digest
See my second channel for supplementary content : lon.tv/extras
Follow me on Amazon too! lon.tv/amazonshop
Join the Facebook group to connect with me and other viewers!
lon.tv/facebookgroup
Visit the Lon.TV store to purchase some of my previously reviewed items! lon.tv/store
Read more about my transparency and disclaimers: lon.tv/disclosures
Want to chat with other fans of the channel? Visit our Facebook Group! lon.tv/facebookgroup, our Discord: lon.tv/discord and our Telegram channel at lon.tv/telegram !
Want to help the channel? Start a Member subscription or give a one time tip!
lon.tv/support
or contribute via Venmo!
lon@lon.tv
Follow me on Facebook!
/ lonreviewstech
Follow me on Twitter!
/ lonseidman
Catch my longer interviews and wrap-ups in audio form on my podcast!
lon.tv/itunes
lon.tv/stitcher
or the feed at lon.tv/podcast/feed.xml
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites. 
Наука
No DRM on the public airwaves. If the rights owners can't agree to that, kick them off the public airwaves.
Ditto in my location just want Antenna tv moved in Connecticut market
This should be a requirement by the FCC to broadcasters of TV and Radio.
Agree, DRM on off air is not the way to go. We the people have the power. Seniors and the poor with little or no internet will be the losers!!!😢😢😢😢 They need to be protected from big business.
💯💯💯
The FCC is supposed to regulate the public broadcast airwaves for the public interest, convenience and necessity and DRM goes against that. It should be disallowed on the broadcast bands. They can still use 5G broadcast for encrypted content.
Take away their right to broadcast over the public air waves if they do not remove drm
Amen
It seems like the FCC is ceding control of the airwaves to the private broadcast companies and their consortium, as if the air waves belong to them.
Lon thank you for being the voice of this community. No DRM.
And less complicated!
How is this legal? These are public airwaves. Thank you for bringing this to everyone's attention!
It is legal because the people with the big bucks say it is legal. The FCC doesn't regulate in the public interest.
It shouldn’t be.
Great video as always. Let's keep up the fight against DRM!
antenna man, just wanted to say you gave us excellent information on choosing a new outdoor TV antenna. Highly recommend your skill set for others who are cutting the cord and want to get an outdoor antenna that will actually work.
Movie moguls fought the VCR. But Fred Rogers (Mr. Roger's Neighborhood) spoke before the Supreme Court about how important it is to allow people to record all broadcast content. They agreed with him.
Someone needs to remind Congress. Show that testimony of the late Fred Rogers to Congress and the FCC.
I had no idea mr rodgers made the vcr possible. Mr rodgers was a great man. 😢😢
Is there a recording on RUclips about that?
It's a neighborly day in my beautywood. For now only ATSC1.0 signals reach my home. My neighbors are welcome to share it over my rather overbuilt wLAN.
It's a neighborly day in my beautywood. For now only ATSC1.0 signals reach my home. My neighbors are welcome to share it over my rather overbuilt wLAN.
DRM should not be allowed on over-the-air broadcasts. Any channels that encrypt their signal should not be allowed to collect rebroadcasting fees from cable companies because they're forcing viewers to use those cable companies in order to receive those broadcasts.
No DRM. Thanks Lon for your work on this issue.
No DRM. Public airwaves need to remain open.
The public airwaves for OTA free TV, and Radio should be DRM FREE, period, end of story!!
Imagine what happens when these devices stop getting firmware updates, thus rendering them unable to playback content when the broadcasters periodically change their DRM keys.
my gess get it and grab it.
They technically shouldn't need firmware updates just to grab new keys. But if that's the way they want to play it, then this technology deserves to die. No one should adopt it and it should be left to die. That's the only way they're gonna get the message that we don't want a future where ads are everywhere around us (and injected into our dreams). A petition of 10k is just going to tickle a little bit and maybe stave off the inevitable for a few years.
@@timramich Good luck getting ordinary robots to agree to this. Our jobs are so horrible that we just want to go home and sit and stare at the screen. Most people do not have an original thought in their heads and do not read anymore so do not have any other option but watch tv. All is lost. The vast majority of people are sheep to one shepherd or another. But they think they are free because they follow a different shepherd. Just stop watching tv let us all cancel our subscriptions to whatever corporation we are now enslaved to.
I'm sure that firmware updates will be readily available, as long as you continue to pay the subscription fees.
Continue to pay? Who's paying now?
One antenna per screen, in the age of networking - unbelievably short sighted.
They don't mean that literally. You can distribute RF signals easily with an amplifier made to do so, and it has no idea about the underlying modulation and digital information that's buried in the actual analog carrier.
@@timramich An interesting thought would be, I wonder how hard it would be to build a box that receives the signal with DRM and then retransmits a copy without DRM. This way you can have rabbit ears on the other TV and watch the content.
Crazy. Hello FFMPEG, how's it going today? How's your friend over there VLC doing? Ready to defend fair use? Of course you are.
@@duracell80 VLC, eww
@@timramich Heh, right? Much better that they don't restrict the technology. The tech is actually really good, an outernet of sorts which is exactly what we need for broadcast media. Internet bandwidth is saturated by video.
It’s all a bunch of BS. They want total control of whatever you do. Great video Lon. Over the air stations should be free period.
Thanks for keeping us up to date on this mess. No DRM is the only ideal.
Here an idea people contact every business that advertise on these DRM encrypted networks. Tell them you can’t see their ads. Once they realize people can see the ads that they pay big $$$$ to the networks for people to see. They will stop paying the networks. Watch how fast things change when the money dries up.
makes perfect sence
Yep if there is an ATSC 1.0 feed, and an ATSC 3.0 feed that's encrypted of the same channel/s in your market(none in mine yet) then I say take photos of every local business you catch advertising on there say during the 5 or 6 o'clock news, and let them know people can't see them on the ATSC 3.0 feed because of this once the ATSC 1.0 feeds go dark, and yep the money will start to dry up for the tv stations for ads!!
I was about to buy a new TV for $1000.00 but I watched you latest video, and I decided to not to purchases one until they fix the DRM. Thanks for your video update.
I have often thought that the whole DRM mess was to force external tuner box and TV set manufacturers to pay the Nextgen conglomerate big bucks for licenses rather than the content protection mantra they keep parroting.
Shitty TiVo been charging monthly fees for years for the use of your personal DVR. NO ONE SAID SHIT ABOUT THAT.
More money to be made for crap for content.This is why I dumped fish.Cut channels And put nothing in it's place.They would also churn programs
Thanks Lon! I am glad you are here to report on this!
I'm not understanding how the FCC would allow a licensened TV station to require Internet to receive television broadcasts. There is still a large portion of our nation who doesn't have internet and they will be locked out.
Imagine DRM when the TV broadcasts are being used for Emergency Alert System. Yet another reason to require unencrypted television broadcast.
DRM is a non starter. It's only there to completely kill the product to force more people to subscription streaming services.
No DRM on the public airwaves!! Thank you for covering this Lon!
The requirement to have Internet to watch over the air signals is ridiculous. My Internet went out 11/3/23 at430am. It's expected to be on tonight (11/6) at 10pm assuming they don't push it out again. How would I watch TV? 🤷♂️. It was hard enough as it is with the fire stick not loading the home screen, then the siliconedust app crashing when it couldn't download the guide data. I luckily had Kodi installed with the addon for siliconedust installed and that worked.
To add to that, there are so many issues, it will be years (if ever) for 3.0 to take over. The thought of dropping 1.0 in 5 years is crazy. That is unless they want to lose millions of OTA viewers.?
What I don't understand is that DRM has been defeated on HDMI/HDCP so any devices, even being a non gateway atsc 3 device, can have its output captured. So why spend so much resources on something you can't protect anyway.
They have to learn that lesson the hard way. They have always had a stick up them about program recording ever since the VCR and it never worked.
Some of it is legal maneuvering. It’s easier to sue people for violating IP rights if they bypass DRM, even if it is easy to actually do so.
Really@@sweepingdenver ?
I'll put it this way.
The only way that they will really sue is if you take that recording and post it on the internet for public viewing or rebroadcast it for public viewing.
Otherwise recording broadcasts and tv programming whether it be encrypted or unencrypted becomes private viewing options and there is a thing called Fair Use for that. Look at Cable and Satellite Television. That's encrypted but it's still recordable and capturable and I have never heard of anyone getting sued over recording off television, etc. Now if you try to do it through the HDMI Cable and not the RCA audio video composite then it will prompt a warning screen but if you are using the RCA audio video composite to capture and record , no. I have recorded and captured from satellite television and that is DRM encrypted and I use the RCA audio video composite with My Video Capturing Device and nothing ever happened to me.
What happens if you don't have Internet or Internet goes down.
that's what I'm thinking I have T-Mobile 5G Home Internet that's been really reliable so far, but what if a tornado hits my area, and takes out the towers, but leaves me with power, then what are we to do for information besides radio which often times is no help at all just shoving 24/7 billboard crap, or whatnot down your throat, and the one good talk radio station here 80% of their day is syndicated radio shows like Glenn Beck that are no help me on a local level.
My thinking is that we will find our selves listening to radio plays and the like again. They used to be a thing before there was TV. Some of them were really good.
As a HDHomerun user, no DRM! I have a cablecard in my home and love it. I know this may go away too. Support what consumers want.
Public airwaves are just that "public". If "we" cannot view them, then take their license to broadcast away. NO DRM. Cable is different as you "subscribe" to view certain channels and your cable box controls everything. You don't get anything if "they" don't have your cable box "number". NO DRM.
Thanks Lon for keeping us informed. I'm only here because I started looking into the HD Home Run option to configure and use with the Plex Channels feature. So annoyed that DRM for OTA is even a thing. Doesn't seem right. Keep up the good fight and I'll be here watching ever update.
Consumers have been abandoning the cable companies for years. So now big corporations are following their own age-old advice: If you can't beat them, take them over. That's what DRM is all about.
Removing DRM from ATSC 3.0 would be best for the general public, especially the economically challenged. Today it's early adopters and those that have bad ATSC 1.0 stations that are impacted. So if you are in both those categories, it really sucks.
Thank you for your activism on this!
This is a reason I don't watch TV anymore. (I cut the cord in 2004, before cord-cutting was cool.) I say that FCC should revoke the broadcast license of any broadcaster who encrypts OTA broadcasts. The broadcaster either broadcasts in the clear, without encryption, scrambling, or DRM, or they lose their privilege to broadcast over the public airwaves.
I agree. In many places there are not enough open channels for all the broadcasters so weeding a few out would be fine.
A broadcast manager friend of mine thinks a big player behind DRM and A3SA and locking down any streaming etc are the large sports groups -- The NFL, the NBA etc who want to carefully control where their live sporting events can be seen.
They've already won that battle. In my home market (San Diego) there are zero Padres/MLB games on OTA networks - they all moved to the RSN. There are also zero NBA or NHL games - they all moved to cable. We still get NFL - but those games are slowly migrating to private streaming networks (NFLN, Amazon Prime) and I suspect will be gone from OTA after the next couple of TV agreements.
I have a great solution: Go watch the local high school games. The skill level may be lower but the teams are evenly matched making for an interesting contest.
@@christeague6681in arizona, las vegas, and utah their teams are available over the air due to the fallout of rsns.
Thanks for the update / video... I cannot go with DRM for over the air TV. We will stay with 1.0 until it is no more then that is it.
The OTA broadcasters realized that the real money is in the cable/streaming rebroadcast fees. The ATSC 3.0 transition is an opportunity to force viewers to get their signal through cable/streaming if they want to be able to use DVR capability. ABC, NBC, Fox, and CBS can afford to spend millions on lobbying, while the individual viewers can't compete with that.
Thanks Lon! NO DRM is the best outcome.
Thank you and the antenna man for helping us fight against DRM which is very bad for us who love to watch ota antenna TV stations recorded watch later. I do have gateway sling TV tuner so I can ota on my cellphone and my fire stick. It's going very bad future when a disaster like hurricanes, tornadoes, fires earthquakes and etc. No way the reaching out to people about important information with no internet and cell service how the DRM going to work? Anyway no DRM please!!!
No DRM and single Tv only operation. People want to be able use gateway devices so they can stream to their tvs. Also what happens if broadcasters get what they want and the Internet fails during a disaster. No one will be able get public information.
Thanks for keeping up with this, Lon! NO DRM!!
Fantastic explainer Lon; technical but totally accessible. Great job. Also, yeah-- no DRM would be ideal, though I'm not going to hold my breath on that. I'm guessing the end game here is OTA PPV and subscription channels that function like PS+ and other gaming subscriptions do... There are so many ways in which that is certain to go wrong-- validating saved (and even purchased) content when a broadcaster goes out of business for example... oof. Nightmares man.
No DRM.
NO DRM on broadcast TV, the encryption would only lock us OTA viewers out and encourage the broadcasters to use a pay perview model on all sporting events and first release movies. We have all cut the cord for a reason
Here's how this plays out Lon.....The BIG broadcast companies have money to pay the powers that be to side with them on this. In 5-10 years you won't be able to turn on a TV without paying, plus ads plus any upgrades such as DVR or multiple home network streams. They will keep the economically challenged quiet by subsidizing them like they currently do with cable companies. It's all about increasing profits.
I agree and to a degree it is also about control of the market. They will keep the little guy with the great new idea out of the market by making it expensive to do anything.
Eventually they will cause the decimation of all TV and its final collapse. TV WILL BE NO MORE. However, other forms of entertainment will arise.
@@malcolden7788 People will go back to reading and sewing and knitting, and churning butter, etc. etc. Anything but watching television. The future children of the world will ask, What is Television?
There is no reason at all for DRM, unless you want to make it much more complicated. If broadcasters don't want you to watch, they will encrypt, otherwise why would they do it? Encryption and decryption add processing overhead and complexity as we see now. They just need to remove it all together, there is zero reason to do this. 😵🤦♂
Cynically, I think the broadcasters want to get/force you to stream their feed, not get it OTA. That way they are in control of your experience, no commercial skipping allowed.
@@robertalverson3398 I think you are correct for sure. I think if it we up to them, they would just want to shut off the broadcast side and just have streaming boxes. Would save a fortune in just power costs alone. Then they can track you for sure and know exactly what your watching etc. And then force you to watch commercials and not be able to skip or anything. I really hope that the FCC steps in and stops the madness with encryption. It's free over the air broadcasts. If they want to encrypt move to cable and then charge me for it. Its suppose to be for everyone to watch who might not be able to afford new 80" top of the line TV's and special hardware. Brings me back to the days of digital TV and everyone having to get coupons for free converter boxes so they could watch TV on their older sets.
Totally agree with you, re: DRM. I think it’ll have a chilling effect on both consumers and businesses alike. It could be _yet another_ example of large profitable companies extracting more value to line their pocketbooks.
IMHO, the writing is on the wall: If we can’t stop or at least dramatically improve this buggy and poorly implemented DRM, then broadcast may continue to die away. I don’t know. Maybe that’s the point?
No DRM. Put a solid state battery in it. That’s always a positive answer in tech.
Thanks for championing this effort. IMHO, there should be no DRM on broadcasts over public airwaves. First, this breaks a decades old standard and second, it unnecessarily disrupts established sidecar technologies.
To quote Mr. Scott: "The more you complicate the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain".
Even the disclaimer before NFL games that are broadcast OTA includes something along the lines of "this broadcast is for private use of its audience." Which means it can be recorded and watched freely by said viewer. They don't rely one bit on revenue from streaming. They rely on advertising live in real-time. And as far as serial programming goes, no one is pirating OTA broadcasts anymore, what with the advent of streaming services. Every single show on TV that is pirated and put up on torrent sites is done so from a streaming platform, and IS NOT from an OTA capture. What I believe this whole scenario really is is just a small investment into something that will fail. Roll out of ATSC 1.0, make everything 3.0, and get people pissed off enough to just abandon it and go back to either cable or streaming. It got people to stop buying music in physical form. Physical video media is almost dead. OTA is almost dead.
Speaking of Plex, nothing would make them happier to get rid of DVR stuff and to get rid of personal media libraries. They push their stupid low-budget free content and push their stupid conglomeration/integration of third-party streaming services.
Here in Canada the providers wanted to do away with the over the air signals but I believe the CRTC ruled against that for now. Only thing I use OTA here is 6PM news and most of the time I nod off during the news. I axed cable here 4 years ago and don't miss it. Only get 3 OTA channels with 2 being sporadic.
Excellent video report on the DRM mess that's part of ATSC 3.0!! These companies seem to forget that the airwaves belong to the public and as such we are all entitled to free over-the-air content without encryption!! I believe what Lon Seidman says when he says the FCC is waiting until all of this gets played out before they do something about this fiasco. Once again, Excellent video!!!
dont hold your breath for the FCC. they are bought and paid for
HDHomerun4k flex user here. Love the quality of ATSC3.0 but am also frustrated by the DRM. I live in the Nashville market and ATSC3.0 is available for all major networks. NBC and CBS are currently DRM so can't see those channels. Lon, thanks so much for keeping us updated on progress. Maybe one day we will be able to watch and record like the days of old with VHS machines. IMO it is greed driven like everything. I just think it is terribly unfair that consumers are restricted in this manner. What about folks who can't afford pay TV services? They should be able to buy a box that allows recording and ad-skipping.
DRM... At least the primary channel on the licensed broadcast frequency should legally be required to be free-and-clear, unencumbered by DRM. I could see some flexibility to allow subchannels to be encrypted in order to offer additional services. The primary channel however needs to serve the public interest and the strings that come with the broadcast license.
We are finally away from needing rabbit ears on all tv's, and now the industry wants to drag us backwards digitally requiring separate boxes per tv again....just insane.
Since the fees are so lucrative for broadcasters, does anyone think that they want to keep free OTA TV? They either want it so complicated that few will bother, and they will stay with cable/satellite or down the road, they will figure a way to charge the viewer.
All current atsc 3.0 tvs are screwed... what a waste of money....
We need to start boycotting all stations that have encrypted stations!!!
Between locking content to devices , the big issue is still requiring an internet connection for television…Could also see them forcing fees on previously free to air television as well as selling content beside free to air similar to the old over the air pay tv systems… starcase, prevue,select tv,on tv….
Connecting to the internet to watch OTA TV? That is crazy. What about people that do not have access to the internet?
@@patrickmartin4996 Maybe renting video tapes will come back or something.
More likely streaming. I doubt many are interested in even DVDs these days. I love them, but many don't care as much.
@@patrickmartin4996 Believe it or not I read a few things years ago that broadcast TV companies were mulling over of doing exactly that. Using the Dish TV method. Basically turning Broadcast TV into a cable service with a monthly fee while still serving you ads.
If they do this with TV the only thing they’re gonna do is encourage someone out there to develop an anti-DRM box just like they used to do for Dishnet work and DIRECTV as they usually say, if there’s a Will there’s a way
BTW, Lon, two stations in San Diego owned by Nexstar have gone ATSC 3.0, but we can't receive those channels any more. Even after the switchover we could receive the channels for a few days, on the channel indicator it would say 51 1 in addition to the regular 51-1. But eventually both went away. They keep advising people to rescan their TVs, but that is not working.
I wholeheartedly support your campaign to get the best possible deal for consumers from all the parties involved in drafting the ATSC 3.0 regulations. I'll also admit that I'm ambivalent about the status of TV in the future. There's scarce programming on TV I actually want to watch, and so much material is available through other media sources that interests me more.
Thank you for your and Tyler's videos. Most of us dont even understand this DRM nonsense. I wrote the FCC, using your link, and told them this... For over 40 years I have been watching OTA tv. Now my SiliconDust HD Homerun with ATSC 3.0 support cannot view public network TV because of "DRM". I asked them why my 1939 RCA radio can still play AM radio, and when will I need to upgrade it for "DRM" 😂?. Seriously though, this is all complete nonsense on behalf of the TV stations. We don't need to watch them or their commercials/revenue streams. And our companiea do not need to advertise on them.
I would never purchase a TV with ATSC3 tuner and expect the manufacture to support it for more than a year or maybe two. After that, that model won't get any more updates. Good luck with those older TV's ever to work after a year or two. Make it through the warranty period and then support will be dropped.
this is how we as a people really talk, REFUSE the new equipment, If nobody is watching nationwide, they will go bankrupt
Class action lawsuit is needed.
Love to go with anyone to sue
I am low income and FORCING me to pay expensive Internet for airwaves I already own is a class action waiting to happen
@@CrimsonTideGuy complain to the FCC to stop DRM Incription.
Lots of interesting info here...thanks. Every now and then I break out the simple little tuner they used to make for Android devices, or even windows but to no avail. It used to work fine but after watching this video, It's easy to see why they will likely never work again.
I recall thinking that little set up was just too easy so it makes perfect sense they no loner supporting it.
Make it work like ATSC 1.0, with better quality!
I would like to express my thanks to the WDAF Fox station in Kansas City for their decision to omit DRM from their ATSC 3.0 broadcasts. This allows me to continue enjoying their content seamlessly using my HDHomeRun Flex 4K tuner.
I don't despair. I know that I am strong enough to take the TV out to the curb. When I need to connect my TV to the internet to watch OTA TV or I can't record the movies from the small hours of the morning, I will cart my TV to the curb and call it the end of an era. I can get a small computer and a big screen and put it there to play videos if I have a reason to play them. There is no reason for me to "upgrade my TV" with a new TV or even a 3.0 tuner as far as I can see.
I live in the Bronx! and we just got aTSC 3.0 channels! I got the ATDH box! but I was getting fewer channels with it! and return it! I hope HDHomerun finally can get the DRM approval! waiting for you and Antenna Man to review "Zinwell ATCS 3.0 top box" coming in December
dont buy the boxes ppl that will encourage them to do worse.
NO DRM! I live in a high tornado prone area. We need storm tracking available from our local stations. DRM is an unreasonable burden to have imposed on everyone in these bad weather prone areas in households with multiple TVs that will all need a new add-on tuner.
Thank you for explaining a complex, multi-faceted issue in plain language. I'm in favor of no DRM although I'm not opposed to purchasing an ATSC 3.0 gateway device that is software/firmware updateable that offers the ability to record broadcast TV programs and a has a TV program guide.
No paywall or tracking on TV broadcast. No DRM, no internet.
Consumer advocacy groups have to make a lot of noise about the ATSC 3.0 DRM encryption issue. If DRM becomes widely accepted among consumers over a period of years, it will only be a matter of time from then on until over-the-air PPV comes about, and that's not good.
Unfortunately they've all been very quiet on this .. Even the AARP which is usually vocal isn't saying anything.
Very good video.. My only comment is that encryption is a direct violation of public airways broadcasting. One rule of even licensed HAM operators is no encryption if I remember. So if they can let us do that then major broadcasters should not be able to do this either. It should be illegal even for cable broadcasters to do the same, but they do..
Apparently the broadcasters and network owners are at odds right now over who gets to make deals for the local channels with youtube tv, Hulu+live, Fubo TV ETC. Which is telling me where this ATSC 3.0 thing is going. I get this odd feeling broadcasters will charge you to watch or Record there ATSC 3.0 broadcasts. We consumers won't like that.
I was really looking forward to getting a 3.0 DVR. Now there are many roadblocks. I’ll stick to 1.0. It works fine.
so public broadcasters do receive some money from the gov for being a public service. I could see online DRM as grounds for lawsuits to cut these subsidies since these networks will no longer be providing a free over the air service They will need to ask if the loss of that money is worth the drm.
charge them 100x the current cost for licenses to fund new licenses for free OTA from stations willing to air free!
No "Deceptive Revenue Maximization" (DRM for short) please on ota signals, I feel for those who need ota as cable etc isn't a functional option, but if this is the future of tv stations I'd rather we abolish ota tv, revoke all the spectrum, and put it as new unlicenced spectrum, it will grt much more better use for the PUBLIC's benefit that way
So where is the link to the petition... why would you not put it in the show notes?
You should link to the petition in your updates on this topic, sir!
Thank you added them this morning to the description!
Too many links, but Where is link to petition mentioned?
If I can't receive a signal and stream it to my tablet, broadcast is dead to me. Ultimitely a device needs to receive more than 1 signal, record them, and then stream them to my tablet or TV.
What is that site you use the see what channel are using what standard and whether they are encrypted or not?
Hi I have a zapper box with a projector home theater setup. Live in Atlanta metro. I only get half of the ATSC3.0 channels now because half of them are blocked out with DRM
No DRM. I want my hdhomerun flex4k to work witj my plex server and be able to see the 3.0 content on any screen i own in my home or when im away on my phone or with our RV tv
I think it needs to stay the same. No DRM. I want to plug 1 antenna into a gateway and send it to any device i want in the house. What if an antenna doesn't work inside the basement? Now I cant watch tv there? Doesn't seem right to me to have to string coax around.
I don't understand why they are bothering with DRM, as anything broadcast ends up on the Internet within a few hours... and without commercials. Are they trying to reduce their already dwindling audience even more?
And that's why they're trying to make it harder.... for it won't happen. But we know it will.. one way or another. But most people doesn't even know a difference between a WebRip and a WEB-DL for example.
3:23 even direct tv connected to antenna doesn’t guarantee being able to receive the 3.0 signal.
They are renting the airwaves from the American people. At very minimum the primary channels including local news should be DRM free so we have a fallback when the DRM inevitably fails. I can't count on an internet connection or a cellular connection during an emergency and DRM has a history of epic failures since it's inception. If they want a place to host some "premium content" I can live with that but do it on a subchannel.
They are not "renting" airwaves - they pay nothing for it. We own the spectrum and have leased it at zero cost to broadcasters in exchange for them providing a public service - namely the emergency broadcast system and one hour of news per day. They are in breach of the deal.
@@christeague6681 No need to split hairs. Compensation is compensation whatever form it takes. If you pay for your house in fish don't think the taxman won't come.
No DRM and open-source Dolby AC-4 so ffmpeg can decode it
I live in NYC and using my HDHomerun with the Freecast app I can watch the ATSC 3.0 encrypted broadcasts for CBS (102.1) and Telemundo (147.1). NBC doesn’t work, the screen remains black but for everything else Freecast works for me right now.
So what do we need to do cause I have one of the new roku tvs but it still doesn't pick them up. Do we just haft to wait
I watch very little over-air TV. I use the cable for phone and internet only. If a program or movie is produced that I want to watch, I wait until it is available on DVD or BluRay. I have a library of over 13,000 DVDs, and don't mind paying for the content - but then I have it "forever", and can watch it whenever I take a notion. I just got "Blue Beetle", and I loved it!
DRM is an resaon why I hate that my landlord makes me use Cox Cable TV. Luckly we don't have ATSC 3 here in Lafaytte, La since one of thing's I'm worried about more then the DVR is The Emergency Alert System. The EAS is also an resaon the lost of AM radio in cars is bad news.
I’m highly pissed that the ATC 3.0 in industry just not understand that the consumers do not want nor can they use DRM encryption. The requirements for an Internet connection are stupid and outrageous. In today’s world we still have a lot of non-Connected communities. These communities do not have access to the Internet as well as they are low income. this also means that they’re watching free air instead of paying for other services. This DRM encryption has nothing to do with consumers at all. It has nothing to do with piracy at all. It is only a money grab it is only design to force consumers, who cannot pay for TV to pay for free to Air television.
14:11 What happens to those of us who REFUSE to connect TV to Internet because it only seems to make the TV less helpful? We don’t want ads in our TV menus so we don’t connect it to the Internet.
they can NOT force citizens to do commerce to enable tv airwaves. People own it and see constitutional lawsuit from that
No ATSC here & no plans to add it & glad as I am hearing there encrypting it.
Do I need to get a new Next Gen 3.0 tuner to receive broadcasting in 3.0?
Greed out of control, the government needs to step in and take away these convoluted restrictions, protect consumers.
What is stopping someone like SiliconDust from breaking the DRM? Is there a legal battle to fear?
It has already been broken I have read.
Hi Lon, I own a Samsung 4K ATSC 1.0 TV that can only play 4K movies when attached to a 4K player. So let me get this straight. As long as my TV is connected to wi-fi, will I be able to pick up DRM encrypted ATSC 3.0 TV with a Zapper Box or something similar? According to Rabbit Ears, only the CBS and NBC-owned stations in Los Angeles are encrypted and only the ABC-owned station and a sister CBS-owned sister station have not filed with the FCC.
No the box (zapper, ADTH, etc) needs to be connected to Wifi in order to decrypt - at least at the moment.
@@LonSeidman Thanks! Lol I took notice you had to nuance your answer with “at least at the moment!”
I used to have one of those boxes to get digital OTA TV. Remember the gift cards they were sending out to help us buy them? I hated those boxes. If you lose the signal it doesn't come back quick or seeming or quick at all at times even. Is this more reliable than those were? Of course I would point out that depending on where you live you might not get a lot of channels with those. There is no guarantee that you will get a lot. I also never found cord cutting to be fun either. You don't have a guide you can scroll through and pick something that is on the air at the moment. Instead with streaming service that a lot of cord cutters use you may feel a sense of boredom with it if you are used to regular TV with one TV show coming on after the other. One other thing that annoys me to no end with streaming services is they prompt you every now and then to see if you are still there. I say just play the damn movie and be done with it already!!!!!! Then depending on what you like you may find yourself with multiple services and paying more than if you just stopped torturing yourself and went back to cable!
The A3SA rules plus with a geatway should also apply after the transition! !! I aleady signed the petition. Should II singed it again stating the above? What can we do to influence the A3SA as they are not the FCC?