PreSonus Faderport 8 Review In the DAW

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 янв 2025

Комментарии •

  • @colaboytje
    @colaboytje 4 года назад +1

    A firmware was added to add banks for plugins. It also had a firmware update for midi-control (you can now map everything to the faders or another button).
    The 1 fader one, isn't only a daw controller, it's an audio interface. It is awesome if you are alone, and you want to record a live instrument: just take it to the place your instrument is placed. Arm, record, stop, listen, not happy, just return to marker and record again without getting up.

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  4 года назад

      Thats great! When this video was made that was not the case. I went and purchased the 32sc console from presonus instead dude to the extra control and the added avb expansion but this is a amazing controller.

  • @negador
    @negador 4 года назад +1

    Hello there, is the Faderport now able to control more than 8 parameters of a plugin?

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  4 года назад +2

      Hello yes As of Studio One version 4.5.5, banking of plugin parameters is possible with the FaderPort 8 and FaderPort 16.

  • @Planetugm
    @Planetugm 2 года назад +1

    Great tutorial and review bro! Subscribed😊

  • @Isaacthompson
    @Isaacthompson 5 лет назад +1

    Thanks for this! Blessings

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  5 лет назад

      I'm glad you found it useful. Keep in mind the new updates have added a ton of new features if you use studio one.

  • @spieglass3211
    @spieglass3211 4 года назад +1

    I assume I can assign any button to an action in Reaper? Like on the single fader model, I assigned the WRITE button to render the project. Can the 8 work the same?

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  4 года назад

      Yes sir you can and it works exactly the same as the single channel just more functions

    • @spieglass3211
      @spieglass3211 4 года назад

      @@IntheDAW nice, I figured that was the case. Now to check on Reverb.

  • @officialWWM
    @officialWWM 5 лет назад +1

    I usually just record my own band but would typically use 10 to 12 channels in a typical mix/recording. I'm an old school producer from the analog world and I'm used to mixing down an a desk. If I understand this product correctly, I could mix down in that fashion from my daw but using the faders. Wouldn't I need the 16 channel version in order to mix down that way and accomodate all my channels that I'm using?

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  5 лет назад

      Yes thw 16 channel would be the one for you. Or you could buy onenof the studiolive consoles i ended up. Buying one of those after using this

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  5 лет назад

      Yes thw 16 channel would be the one for you. Or you could buy onenof the studiolive consoles i ended up. Buying one of those after using this

    • @officialWWM
      @officialWWM 5 лет назад +1

      In the DAW thanks for your reply. I'm currently researching my options, don't want to buy the wrong thing :/

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  5 лет назад

      @@officialWWM what interface do you currently own? I really liked this unit but after using it i really wanted the workflow in a interface and bought the studiolive 32sc because it combined with my 24r. But if you want a channel interface that can be expanded to 32 channels and have the same control as a faderport 16 i would look onto the series 3 original 16 channel consoles

    • @officialWWM
      @officialWWM 5 лет назад

      In the DAW my current setup is pretty basic. I use a Soundcraft UI24 digital mixer which allows 24 simultaneous channels of recording. I do my editing/mixing in Reaper. The Soundcraft is great because it can also do multitrack recording to a USB stick and I can simply drag and drop the files into Reaper. I'm thinking a Studiolive setup may be the best for me but I was just looking for a daw controller as a cheaper alternative and to allow me to use what I already have.

  • @IDEALTUNS
    @IDEALTUNS 3 года назад +1

    Can we link it with Cubase ?

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  3 года назад +1

      yes it can at least it did the last time i tried it.

    • @IDEALTUNS
      @IDEALTUNS 3 года назад

      @@IntheDAW Thanks my friend, The review is very helpful 💐

  • @nyambe
    @nyambe 4 года назад +1

    How about the iostation 24c

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  4 года назад

      The isostation 24c is amazing for anyone who does not need plugin control its a interface and a daw controller. for my uses I ended up buying a studiolive 32sc and combined it with me 24r and love it but the isotation is amazing for a portable rig

    • @nyambe
      @nyambe 4 года назад +1

      @@IntheDAW Now I understand. I mostly track my bass and guitar and play with samples from maschine. The iostation 24c should have had 4 outputs(monitors and main) . It would have been perfect. I mean, who here does not own at least two 2x2 digital interfaces. On well

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  4 года назад

      Yes i own a out 3 lol. If you want a small flexible unit i honestly recommend this.

  • @MustacheVerra
    @MustacheVerra 4 года назад +1

    That sounds like really good advise.

  • @The72Rabbit
    @The72Rabbit 4 года назад

    Just curious if I can do this. I have three tracks, one for omnisphere, one for swams sax, and one with swams violin. I have one Roli Seaboard. What pad controller device do I need to purchase to change tracks in a live performance between the roli keyboard and my laptop using Studio One 3 without touching the laptop. I have purchased No Maschine Mk 2 but am not sure I can designate 3 pads from Maschine 2 to the 3 tracks on Studio One 3. I just want to have pads from a midi instrument like roli keyboard to interchange tracks when in a live setting. Would Faderport 8 do this?

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  4 года назад +1

      You should be able to use machine to do this. The faderport has perfect integration but a machine does have control since it was integrated better inside of studio one with one of the latest updates

  • @bubinga_basher
    @bubinga_basher 4 года назад

    I have Studio One V5 Pro. I'm only looking to record an accustic drum kit. Will this take the place of a Focusrite 18i20?, or can they work together???? Does it have 8 XLR ins? Will a template show up, and ready to record with this? I have a million more ?'s, amd do not trust the "pro audio " people at GC. This vid is almost over, and i really don't know what tbis does???

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  4 года назад +1

      Hi! in the beginning I say its a daw controller. That means it has no preamps. Sorry for not being more descriptive in the video . near the end i say I would personally go for the studiolive series 3 console with faders since it can be upgraded to have 32 input channels and do daw control. Thats actually what I ended up doing. I sent this back and bought a series 3 studiolive 32sc and connected it to my 24r via a cat 5 cable and now I have a 32 channel xlr input console with daw control.

    • @bubinga_basher
      @bubinga_basher 4 года назад +1

      @@IntheDAW The 32 sounds amazing, but like I was saying, I just need something that will make Studio One easier for a newb to record an acoustic drum kit. At most, I’ll only be using 6, or 7 XLR’s. Yeah, I heard you say that at the very end, just as I hit send. I had bought the Tascam Model 24 in late 18. Tascam was misleading about the 24 being a DAW control, so I’m done with them. Anyway, for recording drum tracks, would the Faderport 8 set me up with a template ready to record 8 tracks? Would the Focusrite still serve a purpose? I got a little confused. Is the Faderport an interface. As you already know I’m a brand “newb”

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  4 года назад +1

      Oh okay. if you just need to control studio one. The faderport 8 is a great option and you can easily make templates for your sessions with it incorporated. If you only need a 1 fader control unit tho you should look at the new isostation 24c its a 2 channel interface that has a 1 channel fader port built in.

    • @bubinga_basher
      @bubinga_basher 4 года назад +1

      @@IntheDAW Cool. I’m going to have to do a bit more reading, and watch some more videos on it, but it seems like this would be super helpful. One last ? Does this have 8 XLR inputs?

  • @djjoematt
    @djjoematt 3 года назад

    Thank you. Great video.

  • @Mcbassy
    @Mcbassy 4 года назад +1

    You make me want to buy it!!!!

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  4 года назад

      Its pretty dope i needed more channel's so i bought the console woth faders but man this made me decide i needed faders

    • @Mcbassy
      @Mcbassy 4 года назад

      In the DAW You bought the console? wow. I dont know much about presonus except for the faderports that I have been drooling over for the past several months. What’s the name of your console?

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  4 года назад

      They make so much stuff! I have videos on the channel strip. And all my audio was recorded through the rack console but now i use the rack console with my 16 channel console and get 32 channels total with it. The faders are the same as on the faderport but its a console with a miltitrack usb recorder and miltitrack sd card recorder.

    • @Mcbassy
      @Mcbassy 4 года назад

      In the DAW Wow! Can it work in pro tools?

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  4 года назад

      Yes it can. Its not as integrated as in studio one but it does work well in my version of pro tools

  • @garyshepherd9226
    @garyshepherd9226 5 лет назад

    On a practical level, for tracking and composing, the single fader Faderport is better in my opinion - you click on a channel and you know that is the one the Faderport is referring to - no confusion as to which fader is which. The Faderport 8 and 16 are just too big and would lead to confusion - so I disagree - the Faderport single fader is perfect for most people - unless you are a remixer or sound mixer you don't need anything more.

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  5 лет назад +2

      I am coming at this from the view of a full time mixing and recording engineer who deals with bands on a almost daily basis. but you are right the 1 channel is all you need unless you want the style of workflow as I do. but the 8 and 16 also can control plugins so it makes plugin automation so much fun. its kinda a situation where they are all really good but one is meant for a small portable setup and the others are for people who deal with mixing and recording full bands.

    • @officialWWM
      @officialWWM 5 лет назад

      Are you serious? Have you ever seen a mixing desk? 😂

    • @QrchackOfficial
      @QrchackOfficial 4 года назад +1

      @@IntheDAW Well, you can still do plugin automation. It's literally touch the knob (or move the mouse to it with builtin plugins), Option+M, fader mapped to the parameter.
      Edit: You can also save the mapping so it applies to all instances of the plugin while it is open. I have mapped 8 knobs in my MIDI keyboard to 4 bands of Pro EQ and they work each time I put a Pro EQ on a track, then if I switch to Waves CLA-76, it was also mapped previously so all the knobs get mapped automatically as well. You can do that with any MIDI device and have "plugin automation"

  • @LukaszFrankowski
    @LukaszFrankowski 4 года назад +1

    You do music and still have a wife? 😂 Nice video.

    • @IntheDAW
      @IntheDAW  4 года назад +1

      Surprisingly she hasn't left yet XD

    • @LukaszFrankowski
      @LukaszFrankowski 4 года назад +1

      Awesome happy for you. Sound's like she's a keeper.

  • @IntheDAW
    @IntheDAW  4 года назад +1

    Man my eyes look so red no recording videos at 3am for me