High Altitude Balloon Flight - Over 117K Feet
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 дек 2017
- This video shows the flight of a high-altitude balloon that I helped launched in Sept 2017 for the Astronuts Kids Club in Newmarket Ontario. The balloon was launched from Goderich Ontario and reached a peak altitude between 117K and 118K feet. The payload was composed of a MT-1000 APRS transceiver from Byonics as the primary tracker and a SPOT Gen3 satellite locator as the backup tracker. It also included primary and secondary HD cameras mounted at right angles. The purpose of the flight was to carry kid’s DNA samples to the edge of space. The balloon landed in Lake Eric and was retrieved by local boater that volunteered to recover to payload.
APRS data from:
aprs.fi/#!mt=roadmap&z=11&call=a%2FVA3FBB-10&timerange=10800&tail=10800
Astronuts Kids Club
www.astronutskidsspaceclub.com 
Наука
I don't understand why some insist on posting offensive comments, using inappropriate or insulting language about how we conducted this flight. This event and video was completed to support a kids club. These kids and their parents are viewing this video and reading these offensive comments.
If "YOU" feel that "YOU" can do better, then please invest in equipment that you may never recover, complete the flight and then post "YOUR" own video.
The flerfers are like a cancer of the internet
Great video 👍 block those dummies ... they are frustrated by their religion and don’t like science, the reality. Keep going
Yeah unfortunately a new flat Earth religious cult has sprung up, they are attracted to balloon footage. It is like a light to a moth they can't resist. Just ignore them hopefully they will go away.
Flat believers that I've come in contact with are very mean spirited people. I once asked why would SpaceX or NASA lie & was immediately attacked. I was told that I didn't deserve to be woken & much more that I'll keep to myself. I really enjoyed your video though & am glad I saw it in my recommendations. Keep em comin!
Yes, I've seen the hate between both sides but since I've begun paying attention to the launches on youtube livestream by SpaceX (the Tesla), it was the flats instigating the hate. As far as me asking why would they lie, the topic on flat earth livechat at the time was, "You've all been lied to". But I choose to believe in the globe NOT just because of what they show us but because of what I see with my own eyes. From the shape of our sun, moon & the three planets that I've observed through my own telescope. So therefore, the earth must be similar in shape but you know, in my mind. Heck, I've even seen the International Space Station pass over my house on schedule. Look, if the world is in fact "flat" then yea, I too would like to see a real pic of an entire flat earth. It would be amazing & change a lot but we'd all would continue on about our lives. You're not going to quit your job or stop paying taxes & bills etc... Or will you?
Why can't someone use a 50mm lens instead of a lens that distorts everything?
117k feet,.. and the horizon is still at eye level,.. hmm
i'm tired of all the debates... i'm just going to say this is beautiful footage!
I agree.
Yes. But there are no debates, if you like being lied to or dont care your being lied to keep believing we live on a spinning globe. If you believe in true science look at the real tests being done to disprove curvature pseudo math.
That's fine. Continue to stand by and allow your life to be dictated.
@Lorenzo Lamas You try and explain that to me with no God. Obviously a God created everything for a reason not by random chance.
@Lorenzo Lamas and I answered your question. FE is more realistic and logical than the GLOBE.
So cool that you're helping the kids foster a love of space. Just awesome!
Well, it seems cool until you realize space doesn't actually exist.
@@lightbeforethetunnel wt..
@@lightbeforethetunnel Then prove it.
@@msidc1238 The Second Law of Thermodynamics proves it. All gas pressure requires a container. We are breathing gas pressure right now.
Gas expands in all directions, so it must be contained above us or it would expand to fill the available space and we'd all be dead.
@@lightbeforethetunnel It's called gravity you idiot. The air undeniably gets thinner with increasing altitude.
It looks as if the sun is literally a couple miles from the camera that is amazing
Probably because it is and it would only be like that on flat earth. I’m mostly a globe believe so far but I consider flat earth possible
it is
@Fach Yutuob fr i wanted to say that too my homie bless you , merry christmas!
@@Sealedservant I agree with you
@@Sealedservant probably flat earth is just a viral trend in these days, doesn't mean its real
where humanity has gotten is crazy. a single person or a group investing a fairly worth amount of money and being able to capture the earth all the way above the atmosphere, to where you can see the beauty of this planet. im just amazed.
Amazing! What fantastic work. Blew my mind how far up you went. That sky got real black as you went up too. Wow.... Just wow! Way to go!
The earth spinning so dam fast at a 1000 mph that it look still lmao
Ok flat tard
The balloon is still in the gravitational field so its spinning with the earth as you would on the ground
@@AlyxAesthetics😂
But only on the assumption that the Earth was round and really spinning.
Earth rotates. Observably and measurably.
Hour hand in your mom's clock rotates twice as fast as earth.
Think.
@@AlyxAestheticsBut it doesn't rotate In relation to the sun. Sun is on the same place, camera or balloon is rotating. Also it is filmed with fish eye lense, which compromise it all. I am not scientist, always was pretty bad student, but I can see that in relation to the sun, earth doesn't move, and horizon looks flat, when is in the middle of the picture.
It is still very nice footage for us who knows that the earth is flat. Appreciate it.
This is just amazing. I love these videos...
Very well done, thank you
Over 20 miles up. Impressive. I am more impressed with your images of earth than nasa cgi. Thanks guys.
Absolutely amazing. Excellent job.
Hey, no rotation of the earth??
The camera is spinning too, piece of shit
@@Science_Atrium Why insult the guy for no reason ? Probably in real life you would say nothing.
@@lyrickoner My mentality 2 years ago is not the same as today.
What do you mean you cant see that even if you are in iss because our planet is to big massive to see this and the rotation is actually slow in our spherical globe earth
@@lyrickonerwho insulted who
who cares what shape the earth is. It's beautiful, it's our home. Lets take care of it, treat each other well, and live happily. From up here, it looks like it is a place where happiness is possible. Maybe we can be happy if we see what is important about this place: it has everything we need to live.
Noah Hornberger For Earth the camera is as if it were the size of ant, because the earth is huge and the earth is round.
Well i guess for you it doesnt matter if you re being lied to or to know where the hell you came from.
You re on a pursuit of happiness. Im on a pursuit of truth.
It would be alot better without 20 Billion coming out of our tax money for fakeass NASA !!
If you find the earth is really flat that means we have been lied to for 400 years. Why should we care? Your tax dollars have been funding NASA space fraud. The big secret is we, the taxpayers, are funding the lies. Really are you OK with that. Oh, When they penetrate the dome, the elite are prepared in their dumb housing. Dumb means Underground military bases. You probably have a ticket.
Patricia Howell um no... I'm not in that camp. I just don't believe we're on a spinning ball
Dave VE3001..that was an awesome video. I loved the calm experienced once air was no longer a factor. Keep up the great work. I wish I had a teacher like you when I was a youngster! Thank you.
Es la camara ojo de pez por Dios 😂 si que se creen todo
I just love to watch the sky darken the higher the balloon gets and vice versa. Waiting to watch a video clip of such a flight without so much wobbling and interruptions with the timespan.
A good video and thanks for the effort put into it.
It's a trip how the sun is just right there
It’s actually 92,958,412 miles away.
@@realmccoy you done the math on that yourself?
@@realmccoy hotspot detected , meaning its local, you got debunked by science.
@@RM-ly7kc I did! A+ is Astronomy in 1997. I also CALCULATED the rottation of the Sun by tracking Sun spots for 3 months.
@@ricardotabone3231 what do you know about sun spot cycles
Congratulations. Fantastic effort and well done. I love how you can see that at above 100000ft, you are above most of the atmosphere and can clearly see the thin blue line that is the atmosphere.
Thank you for allowing us this adventure
WOW gorgeous. It got so close to the sun at some points. Amazing :D thank you for posting this
Obviously the sun isnt 93 million miles away then
@@veilbreak5867 it's still far af I imagine. Mabey thousands
Holy cow ,the higher the camera goes the smaller the sun gets wow
Wow! and at at 5:46 it goes from ridiculously huge to ridiculously small in about a second.
My whole life is a lie. I thought duct tape was the Chuck Norris of handyman accessories.
Wonderful footage, the kids must of loved seeing the results of their work.
I bet the kids loved this. Awesome job!
The thumbnail shows the WONDERFUL CURVATURE of the Earth GOOD JOB!
Es la camara ojo de pez por Dios 😂😂
Really🤦♂️ you really buy this 💩there’s no hope for you buddy.
Lmao the earth must be tiny as there a curve before lift off and just after 😂🤣😂 this is a joke yet the globetards still buy this 💩😂😂😂🤦♂️
Sweet! You need more subscribers.
3:08 wow the earth is actually concave up👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
thats just how the camera lens is bended on the edges of it so it can fit into the camera itself
The concaveness of the camera to make the curvature of the earth seem like a straight line at high altitudes.
The concaveness of the camera to make the curvature of the earth seem like a straight line at high altitudes
SWAAAG : \ yup fish eye lenses to make people believe in a curve
Braelon Banger nope it's a go pro fish eye to distort a curve that dosnt exist
Absolutely beautiful thanks for that, anyone who likes nature will surely appreciate your efforts.
Appreciate the video.its amazing what we live on.thanks
is amazing such a huge heavy ball is floating in space like that,,,, and we live on it,, we are so fortunate
Where’s the upside down people in Australia
Not really floating. But okay.
@Looking To Trigger its a joke Иисус xристос, calm down m8y
@@jameswatsonatheistgamer kinda is, since theres no ground in space, but its orbiting so idk
@@viveka2994 No it isn't floating. It is suspended there and gravity keeps it in it's place.
If a Fish eye lens were in fact used in the craft, then the images of the people it was photographing prior to launch would have been "fish eyed" as well. So yeah.
Ricki Keith I got that too, the effect looks quite weak, and moreover the 2 cameras even have different effects
Exactly, its not a fish eye lens lol.
It's a wide angle lens or a fisheye lens one. The Earth is concave is some of this video and it's round in other parts. I've seen video from 150,000 with a regular lens, and it is undeniably flat 360 degrees.
Beautiful view. Great job.
Awesome video....really enjoyed it...I thank you who participated in this.....round OR flat its our world....and it is beautiful...
Question for the flat earthers that are spamming this comments section: If your model is correct, then how come people on different continents don't see different lunar phases? It's hard to explain this with words, so here's a picture explaining what I'm talking about: i.imgur.com/zFVJOkY.png (This image is not mine, it is from a series of daily flat earth debunks)
You can't deny that this is how Moon phases should work on the FE model, it's completely obvious. So I'm curious, are there any explanations for why we don't see this happening?
Lol they probably would say that. Either that or they'll say it's somehow a result of perspective.
Official Flat Earth Answer:
Moon phases don't even make sense in the heliocentric model. A Full Moon supposedly occurs when the Earth is located directly between the Sun and the Moon, and is within the Earth's umbra (shadow) eg. wwwcdn.skyandtelescope.com/wp-content/uploads/Umbra_color_schematic_simple.jpg
So explain how the Moon can be fully illuminated when the Moon is completely within the Earth's shadow. My understanding when something is within something else's shadow, there is no light, that's why they call it a shadow in the first place. Keeping in mind the diameter of the Earth is 7918 miles compared to the Moon's diameter of 2,159 miles, therefore light would have to bend 5759 miles around the Earth for your model to be correct.
A person standing on the equator can see Polaris slightly above the horizon. However this would be impossible if the Earth was a globe because Polaris would be obscured underneath the curvature of the Earth. To see Polaris slightly above the horizon from the equator would only be possible on a Flat Earth.
That's not an answer, you dodged the question and said "but round Earth doesn't make sense either". I was asking if you could explain how the Moon works on *your* model. *Do you have an explanation for why we don't see different sides of the Moon depending on the location?*
Also the Moon *isn't* fully illuminated when it's in the Earth's shadow. The only time the Moon is in the Earth's shadow is during a total lunar eclipse, and when that occurs it's blood red. (Due to the atmosphere of the backlit Earth glowing and lighting up the Moon.)
As for the Polaris question, can you link to some evidence showing Polaris being visible from the equator? And by from the equator I mean the literal equator: 0° latitude. Even if you're observing from 1°N Polaris will be visible. This is due to the fact that Polaris' height above the equator is always equal to the latitude from which you are observing it, which on its own is actually proof that the Earth is round. (So at 37° N polaris will be 37° up in the sky.)
+Timothy Fatburg you can actually see a little more than half of the moon as it wobbles slightly from its tidal locked position. The moon is tidally locked in orbit facing the earth due to tidal forces of the earth keeping the moon from rotation. It rotates bu that is based on tidal lock with the gravity point of the earth being the focus point of that lock. This tidal force and gravity explains many observations of real objects, like planets and asteroids and comets all of which can be predicted and have been by astronomers. Flat earth theory must deny gravity because it destroys their imaginary model. Flat earth is a form of 2d retarded theory and can’t explain the setting of the sun. Why if the moon is a round object which it is we can’t see over 70 percent of it at the same time during the same night at its prescribed flat earth distance. Why stars revolve around the South Pole. Why stars rotate in reverse around the South Pole compared to the north, etc,
Jeez the amount of flat earthers in this comment section is insane. While you guys are here, I might as well ask some questions that I have yet to get a good answer for:
1) Using only the flat earth model, can you predict when the next transit of Venus will be, where it's visible, and when it happens?
2) Using only the flat earth model, can you predict the next total solar eclipse, where it will be, what the path of totality looks like, and when it will happen?
3) Using only the flat earth model, can you tell me when the next opposition of Mars will be?
If your model is correct, it should be easy to accurately make these predictions. I don't even need you specifically to figure it out, just ANY flat earther will do. Just make sure to explain the steps you took to get to your answer.
or how they dont crash and die with their gps which uses longitude and latitude of a Spherical (ROUND) earth.................
Ever hear of an Astrolabe? Ancient cultures have accurately predicted these things using a flat-earth model. It's amazing what you can learn when you do a little research.
An early astrolabe was invented in the Hellenistic civilization by Apollonius of Perga between 220 and 150 BC, often attributed to Hipparchus. The astrolabe was a marriage of the planisphere and dioptra, effectively an analog calculator capable of working out several different kinds of problems in spherical astronomy.
SPHERICAL
Timothy.....why don't you continue living on your magical spinning ball and say hi to the easter bunny for me. Venus and mars are just light orbs in the sky, they are not physical entities. You are trying to mix your spinning ball nonsense with supposed flat earth models and are asking for answers that make no sense. Go back to your fairy tale world of magical spinning balls dipshit.
Hey great job guys, love it! Science for the win!
It is a beautiful video. Nice work team. Thankyou.
fish eye view of the earth.. yeah.. now I'm convinced that it's a ball...... *NOT!*
ruclips.net/video/edsUrLXrlLg/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/edsUrLXrlLg/видео.html
Where's the curve?
one you get flat, you never go back
Theres clearly a curve you blind dipshit
There's no flat earth.
saying the earth is flat is the equivalent of denying math and saying that 2 + 2 = 5.
All Glory To The Almighty, our Creator, Amen. Awesome work Dave and faculty. Thank you.
Very enjoyable. Thank you for posting
4:20 I thought my phone screen was cracked lmao
😂😂😂😂
Where's the 150 foot wall or Antarctica?
Try Game of Trones
it was the white line around the earth you see
@Bomboy Fred nice a FE. Pls stop spreading your dumbass propaganda
@Bomboy Fred because the sun is massive dumbass, and they are barely up in space.
Thanks for the video. A pal did this project with school and university students but they took stills. It's nice to see how the actual motion was.
Dave VE3001...This was done for a kids club? That is so awesome. Back when I was a kid in 6th grade (many moons ago) we built little payload boxes way smaller than the one your team built, made parachutes and attached them to our boxes and placed an egg inside the box, went to the local park climbed up the bleachers to the top and let our experiment go...mine didn't have a chance. SPLAT!! KUDOS to all of your club members. The footage was so beautiful. Very serene. Great Job!!
Where are the thousands of satellites that science claims are in space? Anyone please?
They're spread out over millions of cubic miles.
Rabid Pogoista Why can't we see at least one? That's all I'm claiming, just one in this vast expansion of the video?
Israel Urban It's not high enough and the Earth is vast.
Because the nearest one's orbit is at least 70 miles above this balloon's highest altitude, and that's just at the _closest point_ in its orbit. If you could see it, it would appear at least as small as a star (likely much smaller), and since they're not even able to capture stars in this video, they certainly won't be capturing any satellites.
Israel Urban it's a big ass sky.
nice fish eye lens bro
yamamoto genryusai Hi. İs this video is genuine or falsehood..? İ dont see stars. Why dont see in the space stars..? Maybe musn't see..? How i can believe this video..? Plz explain me:((
its real. you dont see stars bc there is sun. but the camera lens is fish-eye lens so you see curved horizon which is completely a straight line.
here is a high altitude balloon footages with wide lens: ruclips.net/video/Pv4Hwk17F8Y/видео.html
yamamoto genryusai Thnx dear. God bless and contrive you entire time. 🌷🌷🌷🌷
Kamran Abbas ty sir. god bless you too.
ruclips.net/video/3y0nHhFGXDo/видео.html
Well done excellent project very enterprising with beautiful shots of earth wish we had done projects like that at school would inspire !
Well done and thankyou for sharing the film.
the flat is earth.
Even with a fisheye ....proves what you need to see
Exactly, not flat when you pause at center of frame, the expected curve shows.
Centre of frame is more curved even on ground though
Settling this debate is easy. Just watch the hundreds of examples of amateur high-altitude balloon footage that *doesn't* use a fish eye lens. No need to guess. Try searching for "DogCam's 110,000 foot balloon footage" to see what it really looks like up there. A normal lens is used.
Flatter than a starched uniform shirt!
I enjoyed this video sooo much, and all the best with the kids club.
Can someone please explain this. If they say the Earth spins really fast, why is it that from out of space you can't see it spinning???
This is an excellent representation of what a fisheye lens does to the horizon. Notice when the Horizon is above the middle of the screen it curves upward. And when it is below the middle of the screen it curves downward. I was just watching the NASA live feed from space so to speak. And I noticed that they never let the Horizon below the middle of the screen. This gives the illusion to the viewer that the Horizon is curved when in fact it is not. If the Verizon was directly in the middle of the screen it would be absolutely flat.
Even the famous flattard Rob Skuba did the same experiment with a non fish eye lens and showed the curvature of the horizon.
Yes we are still analyzing those videos. You can see and say anything you want. But when you manipulate the non fisheye lens footage with Photoshop you will find a flat Horizon. If you don't believe me just try it. And does mr. Skiba think the Earth is a ball? No I'm afraid he doesn't. Check out Dwight one-ups video on flight routes and the Flat Earth map. This might Enlighten you if you care enough to be.
Brad Beach
There are nothing wrong with flight routes, may i suggest you visit wolfie6020 channel his an international pilot for 30+ years and fly up 51k feet, lots of video's and explanations of flight routes. ruclips.net/video/Vss6zPpfHQo/видео.html
Better here lunar eclipse :). ruclips.net/video/jV0n4JseQT8/видео.html
elonesnah yes I've watched all of his videos and continue to do so and was a subscriber of his at one time.
Very stationary.
NOPE. It is rotating at 0.0007 rpm. Twice as slow as a clock's hour hand. The earth is no more "stationary" than a clock's hour hand which, I hope you do realize, actually turns without your seeing it.
+Ajit Pai
I'd lovr to see you refute what I said, idiot. Go ahead. Try. Oh wait - you cant. Don't you people get educated in the shithole where you live? LMAO
Yes because the balloon moves along with the earth. Do you notice yourself moving? No you don't, you see the clouds and that is proof that the earth is rotating
Elian Iorio Farrell no offense but thats not proof. The winds are nonstop they just keep moving. Like the sea.
Amanda Cardona imagine overtaking a car on the interstate; say you're doing 62mph and the car you're overtaking is doing 60. Firstly, I have problems with your decision to overtake so slowly, but secondly and more to the point, to tge other car it looks like you're only doing 2mph. This is clearly not to be taken as evidence that you actually were only doing walking pace (but I would genuinely love to see someone argue a sleeding ticket in court using that argument).
So a real fish eye lens has a focal length of maybe 20 feet can you explain how it captures an image many miles away with minimal distortion. Do you know what a lens is? Do you know what a camera is? Do you know what photography is? Tell us what would happen if you used a panoramic lens??
Looking at travel path, would you say that the balloon left the jet stream around Mount Brydyes where the dots are tightly grouped?
6:10 clearly fish-eye
No shit.
Yes, and............?
no shit Sherlock. and you're gonna tell me the earth is flat because of this.
No rotation, no curvature. Amazing.
Andre Luiz Batista
you're an idiot.
Even if the balloon wasn't rotating with the earth, a spin rate of 0.0007rpm would be undetectable to the human eye.
No functional eyes, your mother has something else to answer for..
Andre Luiz Batista 100%eaeth is not rotating at site 1000miles. It's hike hy nasa to consider tgta way
It's joke by nasa to consider earth is rotating
If the earth is flat, why do things fall?
Why are there seasons? Why do the days last longer in the Summer and last less in Winter?
How does the Midnight Sun happen at the poles and even in Antarctica, if the Sun is on the other side at midnight?
Why is atmospheric pressure lower at higher altitudes?
Why in a flat terrain does an object disappear on the horizon when it moves away about 50km?
Why at sunset does the sky turn red?
Why does the moon have phases? Why does it shine even at night?
Why is the crescent moon in the Southern Hemisphere turned to the left, in the Northern Hemisphere is it turned to the right, and in Ecuador is it facing down?
Why are there solar and lunar eclipses?
Why in a lunar eclipse is the shadow of the Earth on the Moon round, not flat?
Why do the constellations appear more and more right at the same hour and minute of the night, until they disappear to the right and a year later they reappear to the left if the Earth does not move in circles?
How do compasses work? Why is the north magnetic pole in Canada, not in the middle, and the south magnetic pole is on the edge, not underside?
Why are there volcanoes and eruptions if the Earth is flat and has no mantle and core?
How does your GPS and Google Maps work and know your location if there are no satellites?
Why are the planets increasingly right to the stars if they orbit Earth?
Why are there tectonic plates? Why do they move if it has no mantle and core?
Why are some stars and constellations only visible in the Northern Hemisphere and some only in the Southern Hemisphere?
Why are the planets in different places in the sky every year and sometimes we can't even see them?
How do meteors fall on Earth if there is a dome? What are the Chicxlub crater in Mexico and Vredefort crater in South Africa?
How does the Sun illuminate exactly half the Earth, what prevents the light from passing to the other side?
How do the northern and southern auroras happen?
Explain that, flat earthers!
If the Earth is flat, explain these videos:
ruclips.net/video/W9ksbh88OJs/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/NGZEXkSX9wI/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/FTBaOmJEQg0/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/o_W280R_Jt8/видео.html
Earth curvature videos without fish-eye lens below:
ruclips.net/video/zyq5eN9C4Cc/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/88So6i0-YHQ/видео.html
Why did not anyone ever take a photo of the edge or dug it to fall on the other side?
This comment will shut the mouths of the flat earthers, now what are their arguments to prove that the Earth is flat? The Earth is round, this is *FACT* , it took several years to be studied and proven, and you draw these conclusions just because you see the Earth flat, you do not have to see something for it to be real, flat earthers are imbeciles, they're the cancer of the world, I can't believe there are still imbeciles who believe the Earth is flat in 2018 we are not in the years -6000c anymore, evolve, monkey!!! 🐒🐵🍌
Eh I don't know if this is stupid but I have looked and can't find a camera facing up towards space,, I like the cameras facing out but I wanna see how it looks when it hits the top
Nice experiment for the kids. Greetings from Austria, Europe.
the sun is local af
Whats Underneath the sun @ 8:50? Is that the moon?
@@sigimaya9194 it could be
fisheye lens used in this video. you cannot say the earth is curved based on this video.
no one can argue your second sentence
looked flat to me
It isn't fish eyed tho, everyone is in denial, its sad
Mr E right!! Lmao! Once they've seen them hobo hippies talkin bout flat earth, they should've jump ship,
like cmon
You cannot claim they're using a fisheye lens without actually knowing if they are. That SHOULD be painfully obvious! Flat earth is a wreck!
And u cant say it is flat either ur answers gos both ways
First off I would like to say I don't see any curvature in this video except when the camera starts to distort due to the light but I don't believe the camera is high enough to see curvature. You can't even see passed lake Huron so I don't even know why you would think to see one. Anyways question is if the earth is flat wouldn't you be able to see more land from this height? I'm not taking a side here I'm just curious.
Maybe a daft question but do you have to check flight path of planes before release ???
Forget the curve.. where's the 1000 mph surface speed motion....??????????...?...?.?????????
Zechariah Williams s the earth is that big we wouldnt notice it moving in that short amount of time, it would have to go a lot higher to get pulled into earths orbit, come on this flat earth shite is getting old, simple science tells us this, sick of having to show flat earthers how n where their logic sucksthe
Craig Cowell don't be dumb.
25,000 mile circumference requires 1040mph SURFACE speed to complete one revolution at the equator. No experiment has ever measured or detected motion of any kind. Period and end of discussion 😀
Zechariah Williams First of all, we're talking about Ontario, Canada, which is closer to the pole than to the equator, so the surface there isn't moving anywhere near 1000 mph.
More importantly though, the balloon is moving with the Earth. It was matching forward velocity with the Earth when it was on the ground, so without any opposing forces to resist it after leaving the ground, it will keep moving at that same velocity.
"*No experiment has ever measured or detected motion of any kind. Period and end of discussion"*
That's a statement of pure faith on your part. There is so much irrefutable proof of the Earth's motion you'd have to be a shut-in in your mother's basement to ignore it.
Rabid Pogoista post the experiment that proves motion for one.. I'll wait 😚
Two.. if you agree that at different lattitudes the Earth's rotational velocity must with to zero at the polls or speed up to 1040mph at the equator, how do we not feel that change? Planes are completely unaffected flying north and south.
Three, if you say that the balloon is taking on the rotational velocity of the earth (and thus moving with it), take the following experiment which has been done already and which completely destroys the notion of a moving earth:
At the equator, place a cannon perpendicular to the sky. Fire the cannon straight up and measure the time it takes to come back down. For simplicity, let's say it's airborne for a total of 30 seconds ,(15 up and 15 down). Where does the ball land with respect to the cannon, if the Earth is moving 1040mph (surface speed), West to East? Next, fire the cannonball in all cardinal directions and at varying fixed degrees for each (same angle for all directions). Again, measure the time the ball is airborne, then measure the distance traveled when fired from the cannon and make note. What do we get?
You can sit there all day and talk about angular momentum, yada fricking yada... Till the cows come home... And then some. This is an inextricably, unexplainable phenomena of the rotating fairytale ball earth. The fact of the matter is, the ball comes straight back down when fired perpendicular and the ball goes equal distances no matter the direction (with the rotation, against it, north and south etc).
The Bible declares the earth FIRM and IMMOVABLE in Psalms TWICE. Ancient civilizations such as Egyptian, Norse, Hindu, Aztec, Mayan and the Hebrews proclaim the earth flat and motionless.
It is you, my dear uninformed friend that is the deluded one. Wake up. Either you're deceived or you're a deceiver.
"It's easier to fool someone than to convince them they have been fooled." Amirite?
"where's the 1000 mph surface speed motion."
Below camera, which is also going with same speed together with atmosphere and balloon.
So it's daytime everywhere at the same time on a flat earth?? The Sun is a undirected light source.
Paul Woeszczak For Earth the camera is as if it were the size of ant, because the earth is huge and the earth is round.
João Antonio Gomes ,,Yes I completely agree spherical. I'm stating that in these shots it would be day time every where on a flat earth. Wheres the shadows, where is it night time in these shots? You can see the so called "edge"(CURVE) Totally illuminated all 360º of it. When has the earth been completely illuminated at once?
Paul Dude,
Yup, in fact its mid nite sun all over the flat earth every day.
Just for your information both cameras attached to the balloon use a fish eye lens, which distorts the image giving a false impression of the horizon as being curved. At times when the horizon runs through the centre line of the lens it will appear exactly as it is, flat and level.
Y did the earth concave upwards when the lense moved up... i think I have a good idea
its a fisheye lens. its supposed to do that.
Check out that hot spot from the sun
Whats Underneath the sun @ 8:50? Is that the moon?
At 5:20 the horizon goes from concave to convex. This is an effect of the lenses use to continue the globetard reality. Infact, if you open your eyes and look each time the camera pans around it switches from concave to convex.
Mary Shaw Exactly..
It does, but whenever the horizon runs through the very centre of the screen, it is not distorted at all. I haven't the time or energy to download the video, use software to find the centre of the screen, freeze it at the right point, and check, but I'll make a prediction: The horizon arcs downwards even when it is not distorted by the lens.
What??
Mary Shaw (straight) lines that run through the centre of a fish-eye lens are not distorted. If you freeze the image at the right point you'd be able to see, if the Earth is flat, a total lack of distortion. But you won't, because there'll be a curve.
The curve going from concave to convex and a momentary straight line between the two is not evidence of curve.
Can someone explain to me what exactly is the thin blue strip on the horizon?
The atmosphere
Hello and thanks for sharing your experience
would you please tell me if you had any control on the position of your baloon and tell us about the approximate of investment you had on your project
thank you
Its simple, Planet earth is a globe, for a sense of scale It's diameter is about 8000mi and its
circumference is about 25000mi, so it's easy to say it'd be hard to spot curvature at only about 26mi(educated guess) away from earth.
Haha thats funny Nasa says we can see curvature from a plane? And on the ground our eyes can't see past five miles? Yet get a zoom camera annnnnnnd magic! We can see over the CURVE! SHOCKING
Fish eye lens is the only curve..we have to honest here.
CrazyRobots 2 its not a globe simple You never ever find the curve
The lens distorts the image making it look BENT when in reality it's a horizontal horizon.
STOP USING THE "FISH EYE MANTRA". Please read up on "barrel distortion" that is the product of wide angle lenses and fish eye lenses in particular. Any straight line passing through the center of the frame REMAINS STRAIGHT. Ergo, if you freeze the video when the horizon is perfectly straight, check to see whether or not it crossed the frame at its exact center. If yes, the horizon is indeed flat and the curvature is the sole product of fish eye distortion. If, OTOH, when you freeze the horizon so that it is perfectly straight you see more sky than land, i.e, the horizon is NOT on the center of the frame, then you are looking at a curved horizon in spite of the fish eye lens. That is how it works.
Dont be an idiot, if the the lens was fish eye why did the the horizon look flat during the initial accent?
Your not supposed to detect curve until 150 miles up
And YOU KNOW what kind of lens they're using? I can't imagine why people would laugh at flat earthers!
U kno a fish eye lens will make a straight look bent but the same gos for a curve if a fish eye lens is at the right angel it will make a curve look straight just like a straight line would look curved so u would have to see it with ur own eyes to really know if its flat or not btw planes dont go high enough to fully show u the curve or flatness. Untill us citizens go to space we wont really know the truth but keep an opened mind about everything
Wow thank you so much
No matter how high the camera was, the Sun looked like it was at the same angle. Clear proof that the Sun is VERY far away. From this, I'd estimate it to be about 93,000,000 miles away. Good video!
There's usually not much work to show for an assumption, although I did watch this RUclips video, which seems to be generally acceptable as a scientific study in the flat-Earth community.
My comments were mostly sarcasm, meant to mock what I see many flat-Earthers do; to call some half-baked experiment "clear proof" of something, and even attempt to make a calculation from it.
I stand by what I said though - the Sun looked like it was pretty much the same angle, no matter how high the shot was taken from. That's a pretty good indication that the Sun is freakin' FAR, FAR away. Not far like a light tower across the ocean, a sky-scraper across the city - not even 10's, 100's, or 1000's of times further away than that. I'm talking unimaginably far.
where are all the stars?
Thats the question i have never seen under those videos about view from high distance, and also been bothering me ... where the fck are all the stars ? they are never seen ??
Red Ninja Korus The camera is scaling down the brightness because of the sun.
Ok so explain to me how in this video link below ,there is a sun and stars in the same video
ruclips.net/video/RiGeqsGjhoY/видео.html. So Space Agencies can see stars with their cameras but a amateur one can't ,according to your claims this video link is wrong. P.S please watch the whole video and see how some video shots have the sun and the stars in them. Oh one more thing fuck fish eye lens bullshit curve.
alienbeliverearth bro you belive the earth is FLAT... u are ill in the head. U are Crazy.
Go watch the ISS " live " feed ??? Lol ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha . Daniel-san , the idiot here is clearly YOU .
Please don't use this video to help you determine the shape of the horizon, a 'fishy' eye lens was used on the camera making it look BENT! Have a look at my non fish eye balloon video if you like, it will give you a better idea what it really looks like.
+DAVE FULFORD
STOP USING THE "FISH EYE MANTRA". Please read up on "barrel distortion" that is the product of wide angle lenses and fish eye lenses in particular. Any straight line passing through the center of the frame REMAINS STRAIGHT. Ergo, if you freeze the video when the horizon is perfectly straight, check to see whether or not it crossed the frame at its exact center. If yes, the horizon is indeed flat and the curvature is the sole product of fish eye distortion. If, OTOH, when you freeze the horizon so that it is perfectly straight you see more sky than land, i.e, the horizon is NOT on the center of the frame, then you are looking at a curved horizon in spite of the fish eye lens. That is how it works.
Don't embarrass yourself by making a claim you can't backup. Find out for sure first. That's what honest people do.
DAVE FULFORD Hi. İs this video is genuine or falsehood..? İ dont see stars. Why dont see in the space stars..? Maybe musn't see..? How i can believe this video..? Plz explain me:((
+Kamran Abbas
You don't see stars because the camera exposure setting is set to show the sunlit ground below. If the camera exposure setting were set to show stars, the ground below would be a bright white overexposed blob of light. That is why.
corisco tupi Ok. When time i can see stars in space..? For ex we look sky from eath and see stars in night time. Why we dont see stars dark space..? Maybe space dont dark..?
Nice to see something from Canada!
the surface of earth wobbles around. its round to flat to concave... so many shapes,this earth is wonderful. such a moving planet :D
The SUN is Not a million miles away
Prove it to me!!!
it is dude it is
@@HerrUnfug proof
Proof
he right, its actually 93 million miles away.
earth seems pretty much steady, no rotation at all...
(update)
2/23/18
and yet, it still motionless, sill flat.
If, only if we were living in a globe then why we don't have a moon rise or a moon set?
Why the sun is bigger in the sunrise an in the sunset?
I give you the info, you figure it out what to do with the truth...
And how would you expect to see rotation when atmosphere with baloon is also rotating with Earth? and BTW Earth rotation speed is 1cycle/24h => 0,0006944 rpm, and you have a guts to call this spinning ball?
You're not gonna notice any movement at 15 degrees per hour! Why do you think you should notice it rotating at such a slow speed? Once again, misinformation! And you people STILL refuse to do any research. WTF!
Its takes the earth 24 hours to spins around once, you know >)
Annette Sanches
so how is the correct math make believe? you would never be able to detect visually such a slow spin especially in the few minutes of video here. Just keep repeating earth is flat NASA evil earth is flat NASA evil.......thats what they want.
Ivan Reuchon Are you fucking dumb? The balloon is rotating with the earth you fucking plum!!
Great Job Guys and Gals...Very Good!
My question is!! Can someone tell me how high can one send up the high altitude baloon actually? Is this the max altitude or it is possible to send it further? Thank you
+Jan Choi
You an send it higher if you reserve empty space inside the balloon to allow for further expansion of the gas inside. The usual way of doing this is filling only the minimum amount of helium that will actually lift the balloon. This is why large balloon experiments look like they are only partially filled at launch - they will keep expanding at altitude without bursting. See image below.
tinyurl.com/partially-filled-balloon
This video only confirms a flat plane. Lens distortion aside, ie when the camera stabilizes and does not show a warped horizon in either direction, it is very clearly a completely flat horizon in all directions terminating at mid point as the vanishing point. At that height on a sphere the size of earth the fall off on all sides to the eye would clearly show to the observer (camera). A little art class 101 on perspective shows that spheres fall away from the observers perspective and a flat plane will always disappear at midpoint, hence "vanishing point".
Another thought, how is it that the rotation works with this object so high in the atmosphere? Everything including the reduced atmosphere is still being pulled along with earth's gravity at hundred's (something a bit smaller than the 1034 at equator) of miles per hour? Or is the balloon now more free of the atmosphere and therefore would have reduced effects of being pulled with the rotation of the planet? Wouldn't the balloon then lag far behind the rotation of the earth and end up landing hundreds or more miles away? Or is that just gravity that is accelerating the balloon with it's special magic? Seems pretty calm up there...
Not enough good answers for all the problems on either side of this diametric debate. There are never just two sides to anything. Open minds, open forum people. It's so disappointing to read the wretched comments by people that prefer to attack, insult and obfuscate.
G Get your self a glasses you idiot i can see slight curviture the more it went up
vanishing point? stupid!
That because when the curve comes, the guy controlling the camera on the ground adjust for the curve to make it appear straight.
U can notice this everytime the camera tilts when controller is moving camera slowly and not violent.
The earth is not flat!!!!!!
This not high enough to see the curvature of Earth, but it doesn't mean the Earth is flat. The horizon looks like a flat line, which is geometrically EXPECTED when you look at a sphere when you are close enough. The vanishing point, from the observer's perspective, is the same from every direction. Because it's the same distance all around, it looks like a flat line no matter your orientation.
G Hi. İs this video is genuine or falsehood..? İ dont see stars. Why dont see in the space stars..? Maybe musn't see..? How i can believen this video..? Plz explain me:((
0:11 making curvature out of everything lel
Same thoughts 😂
very kool, thank you for sharing
The curve is fantastic 🤙🏼
Kansas is about 400 miles long...and 210 miles wide... AND WAS OFFICIALLY DETERMINED TO BE FLATTER THAN A PANCAKE. No curvature there.. when there should be.. given the math formula for determining the earths curve.
An American geography professor has shown the landscape of the state of Kansas is "as flat as a pancake." In fact, geography Prof. Mark Fonstad of Southwest Texas University concluded the topography of the wheat state is flatter than a pancake.Jul 25, 2003
So water.. which lies flat in it's natural state... can be manipulated.. but it will always revert back to it's natural state... FLAT.
Why is it that so many.. cannot figure this out ?
It is because of the magic of the imaginary theoretical force called gravity.. that has been pounded into peoples brains for centuries.. that claims to make water adhere to a spinning ball in motion.
It cannot be physically possible given what water does and how it behaves in it's natural state. Not to mention.. the globe earth is surrounded by the "vacuum of space".. and yet nothing gets sucked off the surface of the earth... and since "space" is more vast... just what is producing the vacuum in the first place? hmmm.
NASA is untrustworthy.. and the heliocentric model.. was touted as fact.. waaaaaaay before there was ANY evidence that it was true...... and it's not.
Go pro cameras... are not the right equipment to use for such a venture as this.
There are plenty of real videos taken without barrel or fish eye distortion.. showing the earth to be flat in a 360 degree radius from the camera's position.
*WAKE UP PEOPLE*
Pancakes aren't that flat.
Common Sense Hill How stupid are you? Water wont be sucked off because of earths core and its "magnet", jump and you wont be floating in the air, jump from a building and you will be going down in seconds. Also this balloon wasnt even high enought to show curviture, its under 400km altitude to even show 3 degrees of curviture let alone more
Please don't reproduce
The earth is 100% STATIONARY!
Sorry but no, troll.
Just pointing out the OBVIOUS.
+DAVE FULFORD
Please explain why the relative motion of stars is not around one but TWO DISTINCT poles - and in opposite directions (CW, CCW) at that.
Please explain two high and two low daily tides.
Please explain how the Foucault's Pendulum changes its plane of oscillation exactly according to the rotation of the earth corrected by the local latitude.
Please explain the optical gyroscope detection of the earth's rotation in this university lab experiment:
tinyurl.com/large-optical-gyroscope
Please explain why the navigation systems in every modern airliner such as Boeing, Airbus and Embraer NEED to detect the earth's rotation in order to function properly.
Bonus:
Explain how it feels to ride in an airliner whose mere functioning proves something you idiots deny.
Added bonus:
When flying in said airliner, please take a selfie shot and post here, so we can all laugh at the face of a flattard in the midst of a cognitive dissonance process.
YOUR questions only serve to demonstrate YOUR COMPLETE and UTTER LACK of understanding of the environment within which you find yourself and YOUR foolishness at accepting the oh so OBVIOUS lie with which you have been presented. YOUR 'bonus' comments convey your CONTEMPT for truth and those who seek the truth.
Of course the earth IS a flat stationary plane so answers to the above exist or you might say explanations exist as to why the questions you ask are built on false presumptions in the first place.
Read these books and you will have your answers:
1. Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe (Fully Illustrated). By Parallax: Samual Birley Rowbotham.
2.The Greatest Lie on Earth Proof That Our World Is Not a Moving Globe. By Edward Hendrie.
3. The Flat Earth Conspiracy. By Eric Dubay.
But I don't expect you will read these books, I think you already know the earth is flat and have a vested interest in preserving the lie.
+DAVE FULFORD
*"the questions you ask are built on false presumptions in the first place"*
Nice try, but even if that were the case, you should be able to give good answers to each question, simply because each and every one of the issues mentioned are real world facts that any person may easily independently confirm by simple observations. It's not like I stated anything that came from NASA or de Grasse's books: they are all plain, everyday FACTS that any person can confirm. Now please go ahead and give your flattie explanation for each. OH WAIT - You cant.
You want me to read "books" by *known charlatans of the caliber of Dubay?* Seriously? LMAO Are you freaking kiddidng me? LOL There is this other one, of the dermatologist, the orthopedist and the neurosurgeon stepping into the autoparts store, that is also freakin hilarious.
Just address the issues, flattie. It's not such a big list. STOP DODGING.
LMAO
-- how the balloon is ensured to come back at the place it begin ?
I appreciate what you have done. But when you're looking at beautiful Mother Earth, and the beautiful horizon, why record vertically?
This proves nothing. STOP USING FISH EYE LENSES
EuphoR1aWESOME first of all READ THE CAPTION DUMBASS this video was not made to prove either argument. It was just some kids launching a high altitude balloon. Maybe instead of yelling at people you could put out some evidence to prove you are right. I believe that the earth is flat. As I said in my post. But at the same time if I were 100% proven wrong I would accept it. And your hollow earth THEORY! Is just that. I looked into the hollow earth for a long time and I couldn't prove the flat earth wrong. So screaming at ppl over internet posts with no real evidence to back yourself up is rediculas. Show me a full shuttle launch from Start to finish from multiple angles NO BREAKS OR CUTOUTS and I will admit that I am wrong. Without screaming at you. You should be open to debate and not so close minded
btw simple proof is every other planets are round..
EuphoR1aWESOME that is a really good debate. I don't have an answer for that. And how do you know there is no dome. And you been to space. I haven't. I'm also not forcing it down peoples throats. I want everyone to research this for themselves. Don't believe me that's fine I'm not going to cry over it
STOP USING THE "FISH EYE MANTRA". Please read up on "barrel distortion" that is the product of wide angle lenses and fish eye lenses in particular. Any straight line passing through the center of the frame REMAINS STRAIGHT. Ergo, if you freeze the video when the horizon is perfectly straight, check to see whether or not it crossed the frame at its exact center. If yes, the horizon is indeed flat and the curvature is the sole product of fish eye distortion. If, OTOH, when you freeze the horizon so that it is perfectly straight you see more sky than land, i.e, the horizon is NOT on the center of the frame, then you are looking at a curved horizon in spite of the fish eye lens. That is how it works.
Kyle Loomis Theres a video of camera mounted on space shuttle which shows all types of angels from launch up to space, it clearly proves how retarded you flat earthers are, you all need to visit pshisycian immidietly
Looks pretty round to me
Fantastic video mate thanks.
What an amazing experience! Thanks for share us. How it all this possible haha! The best for you guys
Where are the stars, like NASA we cannot see them. So.....
The stars aren't visible because the camera is exposed for the sunlit Earth, which is much brighter than the faint stars. This means the stars are incredibly underexposed and thus rendered invisible.
In order for the camera to pick up the stars it would have to overexpose the Earth, which is obviously not what we want as the Earth is the interesting part of the video.
tim beat me to it ^ ronald, i suggest learning a little bit about exposure, dynamic range, the human eye vs camera sensors and what they are able to see, and aperature, and how the human eye changes aperature in light and dark situations. (if you look at a human being's eyes, you can see it actually happening).
photography is a fascinating subject. i recommend it if you wish to learn more about how things work in this lovely world. x
The reason you cannot see stars in space is because, for example, if you stand in a city on a cloudless day and look up, you'll see no stars. Now go out to an isolated countryside area on a cloudless night and you'll see millions of stars. This is because of light pollution. Now this is with the human eye, and it's the same with a camera in space, or a camera anywhere. Try to take a picture of a starry sky and your camera just won't pick it up due over-exposure, which is similar to the light pollution us humans see. Now with the sun, when a camera is in space, the main force of the light it's picking up is from the sun and the light reflecting off large objects. Taking a mixture of both the light pollution answer and the over exposure answer, this is why you cannot see stars in space, through a camera.
Elian Iorio Farrell
Ok, I watched a video the other night. Astronauts are crazy something like that, someone said yes you can see the stars, others said no. I recommend you to watch it. My point here is, probably they can put more cameras with different views. I am looking in the internet from what you said thank you.
So we can assume NASA uses very similar footage to these amateur balloons (from a similar altitude) to fake space flights.
Dear flat earthers, if are not using your brain, stop asking!
Where is the rotation scientist say earth has.@ 7 minute mark camera looks steady. Or is the ballon rotating with the suppose earth?
Is there a lot of prep time to
Do something like this and what is a ballpark cost to do this? I would like to do something like this with my kids! I think it would be a memorable experience 🙂