(CAA) Citizenship Amendment Act 2019 Explained!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024
  • This video is on Citizenship Amendment Act CAA 2019. The objective of this bill is to give citizenship to illegal migrants of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan belonging to Hindu, Sikh, Christian, Parsi, Buddhist and Jain communities.

Комментарии • 583

  • @Ektakundla
    @Ektakundla 4 года назад +97

    Best explanation of CAB i have seen in past few days.

  • @dinesh12981
    @dinesh12981 4 года назад +26

    Sir the language of your every lectures are so comfortable that even a layman can easily understand complex topics, thankyou for such videos.

  • @allnone7278
    @allnone7278 4 года назад +22

    I watch almost many videos to understand CAB. This is the full explanation and anyone can understand .
    Thankyou sir

  • @milanpatel6736
    @milanpatel6736 4 года назад +34

    I watch adds on your video, a little bit of payback.
    Thank you for this wonderful video. We all love you a lot. Always awaiting for your videos. ♥️

    • @PradhumnShandilya
      @PradhumnShandilya 4 года назад +1

      You need to click those if they're skippable, else skipping ad doesn't fetch money.

  • @sbaranwal978
    @sbaranwal978 4 года назад +66

    Sir if you have some time then let's start the hindu analysis because your voice is god gifted which is so clear ....

    • @ankita2170
      @ankita2170 4 года назад +1

      Yeah literally

    • @Adi-qj6ci
      @Adi-qj6ci 4 года назад +1

      What's "hindu" analysis ?

    • @kmcyasaswi243
      @kmcyasaswi243 4 года назад

      @Pooja Sharma you have misconceptions in understanding Sanatan dharma

    • @SohamAmbekar21
      @SohamAmbekar21 4 года назад +4

      @M Azad you think her thoughts are noble but you conviniently say Muslim community cannot be convinced to this type of thinking.. i am not playing a blame game here.. but this just doesn't feel right.. its like muslims don't even wanna make an effort for peace...its always my way or highway... if you believe there is "no other but allah" other faiths are fine by it... But the Muslim community should atleast respect other faiths and others beliefs... If only this change happens... There will be little or none communal clashes.. and the hatred and this stupid competition will end... Please act like an individual and dont be blind in following your faith... No Hindu,jain,buddhist wants to convert you... Just show acceptance and see where India will be.
      Peace ☮️

    • @SohamAmbekar21
      @SohamAmbekar21 4 года назад +1

      @Pooja Sharma i think he was reffering to your 1 god statement... Cause hinduism is polytheistic/monotheistic/atheistic depending on the follower and dharmic in nature...and others are monotheistic and Abrahamic.

  • @ashoksekar8300
    @ashoksekar8300 4 года назад +21

    Thanks for coming such interval with relevant and nut shell information, Teacher.
    Thanking you..

  • @rosythakur1923
    @rosythakur1923 3 года назад +18

    Much appreciation for such a precise and lucid take on the citizenship bill .Great work.

  • @mangalchandmondal4314
    @mangalchandmondal4314 4 года назад +126

    sir make a telegram channel for your lecture 's pdf

    • @user-sn6dj8sx2p
      @user-sn6dj8sx2p 4 года назад

      ruclips.net/video/TAwqaOAwtbU/видео.html this video clarifies many doubts

    • @Glitzwithme
      @Glitzwithme 3 года назад

      @@user-sn6dj8sx2p hey....😀... R u from which state?

  • @jarpulaakhil2726
    @jarpulaakhil2726 3 года назад +4

    Great explanation ever on CAB.. Whate flow your having!! Even a small kid can understand if he's aware of English. You have great voice.. and regarding the content It was massive # I have watched all your videos. They are simply rocking🔥in very less time bountiful information is given.. At last ## wish you a very all best.. Keep doing videos for us

  • @Glitzwithme
    @Glitzwithme 3 года назад +4

    Powerful voice...best class ever ❤️... lots of love and prayers from Kerala

  • @Bm-kp6ek
    @Bm-kp6ek 4 года назад +10

    This is not a good analysis, you didn't mention the main point,the Assam accord 1985.

  • @eternity9691
    @eternity9691 4 года назад +49

    Omg I love your voice. It's crazyyyy good !

    • @sakshipal9638
      @sakshipal9638 3 года назад +5

      His voice makes me to concentrate even more❤❤😂😂😂😂

    • @sakshipal9638
      @sakshipal9638 3 года назад

      @Ash P ,😂😂😂

    • @janer7772
      @janer7772 3 года назад

      @Divyansh Jadli hahaha :D he is my asmr

  • @arjungurjar4600
    @arjungurjar4600 4 года назад +1

    Hello Sir , Little suggestion , if you reading this comment , if possible please try to make videos in mix of hindi + English that would be more interactive . Because your videos are a boon to the all civil service aspirants .Thanks for all your videos !!!

  • @vish0929
    @vish0929 4 года назад +24

    Tq so much sir....... Your voice is so much crystal clear... I really love ur explanations sir... Very helpful

  • @gautamudayabhanu7424
    @gautamudayabhanu7424 4 года назад +8

    Sir, IMPORTANT: The article 14 text that you have shown in VIDEO is wrong. Someone had edited the site purposefully after this CA ACT came into force. The actual text of the act ends at "........ territory of INDIA." There is nothing beyond that.

    • @akashpatel70239
      @akashpatel70239 2 года назад

      Edited the site it seems. Does some has changed all the textbooks available in the world as well

  • @nishtasharma6025
    @nishtasharma6025 3 года назад +5

    wow!! your explanation actually blew my mind, I have been trying to get facts from here and there but there is always a bias. thank you

  • @ilarikasethi7877
    @ilarikasethi7877 4 года назад +55

    #mythought on article 14. It says "state shall not deny any person". the bill is only reducing the years of some community.other communities can still enter through legal means if they want citizenship.

    • @chandrashekharhindu9433
      @chandrashekharhindu9433 4 года назад +26

      Exactly......pr kuch anpadho ko kon smjhaaye ?? Unko bas modi ka virodh krna h.....

    • @NoneOfTheAbove123
      @NoneOfTheAbove123 4 года назад +15

      I concur, other's aren't being denied citizenship, so the argument of opposition stands falsified. Also, claim over citizenship isn't even a right, the grant of which depends solely on the statute legislated by Parliament and discretion of executive government.
      Rather bestowing citizenship upon those who are persecuted on the basis of religion is in coherence with the recognized principle of non refoulement of refugees save infiltrators/illegal immigrants.
      On the second note, SC can't question the wisdom of Parliament regarding the intent behind the passage of any legislation.

    • @shanthalakshmi2082
      @shanthalakshmi2082 4 года назад +2

      @@NoneOfTheAbove123 Reasonable classification test and conditions under article 14 is met, so the legislature have had given strong case for providing exception to the minorities of these 3 Islamic countries.

    • @sidhueducationzone
      @sidhueducationzone 4 года назад +6

      Actually this bill is introduced after NRC in NE,,,and in this 1.9mn have been declared illegal migrants,,by this amendment all communities still can become indian citizen and what about muslims they will either be thrown out or will be jailed.

    • @nuunuu246
      @nuunuu246 4 года назад +10

      @bscrazy007 in the NE the protest against CAB is not based on religion. The protest is to protect their delicate and distinct culture and language. And the protest is based on demographic facts found in Census 2011 and Tripura is the lesson learnt.

  • @s.kumari113
    @s.kumari113 4 года назад +6

    Wonderful explanation as always.
    About Article 14, I'll clarify here that "any person" includes non-citizens as well. This isn't a loophole in the constitution. Constitution uses word 'citizen' specifically wherever required, you may check Art. 19 for an instance.
    Also, Prohibition of discrimination is in Article 15 and not in Article 14 as mentioned here in the video.

    • @zesu4u
      @zesu4u 3 года назад

      Agreed Article 14 is available to everyone irrespective of his nationality.

    • @anubhavmishra32
      @anubhavmishra32 2 года назад

      Yes reading bare act with supreme court comments....this is correct 💯💯💯

    • @furiousgaming275
      @furiousgaming275 Год назад

      ​@@zesu4u where is it mentioned

    • @Sv-iophj90
      @Sv-iophj90 8 месяцев назад

      And as per Article 11 Indian Parliament has the right to do so when it is about it's security and limitations. And i hope you do agree that Parliament is a constitutional body lawfully made!

    • @s.kumari113
      @s.kumari113 8 месяцев назад

      @@Sv-iophj90 Parliament does not exercise absolute power of making laws. Please read Article 13 sub clause (2).

  • @manas4709
    @manas4709 4 года назад +11

    "Reasonable classification under article 14, to achieve a particular goal is permitted" is being cited in support of the Act.

    • @kamilraza8722
      @kamilraza8722 4 года назад

      Yes and the reasonable classification should be not based on religion..it should be .intelligible differntia

    • @manas4709
      @manas4709 4 года назад +6

      @@kamilraza8722
      Thanks for commenting.
      I'm not here to defend. Also it's already now a matter of hon'ble SC.
      In my understanding - There was no better way to address the problem.
      👉We have similar provisions, like
      1. reservation is based on caste, because backwardness is somehow related to caste based differences/discriminations (of past).
      2. Minority status is based on religion.
      In this (CAA) case persecution is based on religion.

    • @kamilraza8722
      @kamilraza8722 4 года назад

      @@manas4709thanks for replying
      ... if you read out the whole CAA bill or act ...you will not find "religious persecution" there...not even word "persecution" written in the bill.

    • @manas4709
      @manas4709 4 года назад +3

      @@kamilraza8722 true. Neither (religious) persecution nor (religious) minority is mentioned in the CAA. In fact, they clearly mentioned 6 religious groups.
      My view :
      1. Is it possible for someone to prove that he/she is persecuted? It may be possible for someone. But definitely not possible for everyone.
      Suppose one house has been burnt by persecutors and the whole family got killed and then rest of the villagers crossed the border in fear (or to escape) of their persecution. [maybe it sound hypothetical but DATA and News shows the worst situation of them. ]
      So they are deemed to be persecuted.
      2. We can't be dependent on the parliaments of these three countries. If we use a term like 'religious minority of Pakistan' and then they amend their constitution and give a minority status to a small number of people (hypothetically some 5000 people's group) or they can assign a non-Muslims group to a second majority/ non-minority. This can become a loophole in the Act itself and we will be dependent on their constitution while applying our Constitution's Act.
      So the government is saying different things and the Act shows a mis-match in their words. What's their intention ?
      To know the intention of the government we need to refer the 'on record ' discussions of the parliament.
      I hope you find it logical.
      Thanks.

    • @kamilraza8722
      @kamilraza8722 4 года назад

      @@manas4709 ok ..i take ur point bro..and it might be the reason..
      Other picture ..
      If they had written persecution in bill they had to include other persecuted groups like Ahmediaa in pak..,Hazaras in Afghanistan (persecuted by Taliban .), Rohingya in myanmar which they not included i dont know why( becz 2013 UN said ..word most persecuted people)..
      I hope u understand intentions

  • @kanishkrawat9322
    @kanishkrawat9322 4 года назад +11

    India's GDP can shoot up by several per cent points if we can, legally and socially
    1) end caste system
    2) end gender inequalities
    3) end inter-religious friction
    Think about it. More prosperity, more wealth, more peace. Naturally, some won't like it. But most would benefit.

    • @lokeshkatal46
      @lokeshkatal46 4 года назад +1

      You might be right on your pact brother but this statement is like "I want to take the fragrance of flower from it "
      Is it anywhere possible

    • @shaners1591
      @shaners1591 4 года назад +1

      Uniform civil code will help with most of it. and religions will always exist as long as islam exists. entire world is suffering from islam disease

    • @mr.possible401
      @mr.possible401 4 года назад

      These are comes to happen in dream but not in reality.when top 3 happened when we eliminate politics

    • @julianasimte3712
      @julianasimte3712 4 года назад

      @@shaners1591 Islam is not the only religion in the world. And nor is any religion better than another.

    • @shaners1591
      @shaners1591 4 года назад

      @@julianasimte3712 I beg to differ. Islam is cancerous with their ideology. And this is after I have spent 4 years studying religions. Overall, dharmic religions (hindus, buddhism, sikhism) are much better than abrahamic religions with their approach to a belief system.

  • @shubham-pawar
    @shubham-pawar 4 года назад +3

    You explained it really well. Everyone needs to know what it is all about before making conclusions and spreading hate and misinformation.

  • @sasiseeram9174
    @sasiseeram9174 4 года назад

    Sir i have watched thousands of videos but i never impressed this much. Your explanation skills are too high. I will watch every video from your archives. Afterall your english fluency is marvelous. Great job sir. You must be in the rank of civil services.

  • @francisralte4194
    @francisralte4194 4 года назад +2

    sir, i would like to suggest something about your videos. you have a soft-spoken voice, very crisp and clear to listen, but many ads are annoyingly loud, so when i listened to your videos at a preferred volume level, when ads come in, we have to rush to turn down volume. so, my suggestion is to edit your video sound volume a bit higher by default., so they are at the same sound volume level as annoyingly loud google ads.

  • @khushiarora1670
    @khushiarora1670 4 года назад +2

    I am so thankful you made this video!!! Great skills of narrating and explaining.

  • @frankylamare1684
    @frankylamare1684 3 года назад +1

    I love your teaching Sir ,very straight to the point.Love the fact also you've explained in English. I am that person who understand Hindi a little bit.

  • @actuallyarvind
    @actuallyarvind 4 года назад

    Sir, that was the most lucid exposition of CAA and problems surrounding it, thanks for that. 🙏

  • @anamikaponiyan3896
    @anamikaponiyan3896 3 года назад +1

    The explanation was really very awesome sir
    Thank you so much

  • @gauravkumargupta1347
    @gauravkumargupta1347 3 года назад

    No one is like you on the you tube.
    You have nice way to understand.
    🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @balajyo1996
    @balajyo1996 4 года назад +1

    Sir clear explanation 👌👌👌👌👌guys stop fighting....!
    India is not only for Hindus or Muslims..
    it's all for humans to spread humanity....

  • @PraveenKumar-lk6kp
    @PraveenKumar-lk6kp 3 года назад +2

    Thank you for explaining in such an articulate manner

  • @ashutoshtiwari9225
    @ashutoshtiwari9225 4 года назад

    Excellent communication and presentation with clearity of topic and make it in a vry simple language...
    I personally like to see your all videos been a civil aspirant...
    Thank u so much sir with due respect...

  • @peace4368
    @peace4368 4 года назад +3

    I was eagerly waiting for your lecture on this topic. Thank you so much Sir.

  • @ujwaldhone3555
    @ujwaldhone3555 4 года назад +4

    You said you are not giving opinion but here you are giving opinions. Make sure you just educate the students and don't form opinions because there are already Media channels which are doing that in return for money.

  • @shadows2909
    @shadows2909 3 года назад

    Ohh god!!!
    Where were all this time
    With the shit going out all around
    YOU HAVE EXPLAINED THE ISSUE THE BEST!!!

  • @Lomou
    @Lomou 4 года назад

    Luckiest are they who will be lectured by you sir.... What a clear lecture!

  • @hswankhede
    @hswankhede 4 года назад +3

    Article 15, 16, 19, 29, 30, are applicable only to Indian citizens. While rest of the articles in part 3 of the constitution are applicable to both indian citizens and foreign nationals. Refer for 9:10 .

  • @simranmonga3960
    @simranmonga3960 4 года назад

    Highly eloquent and informative lecture ,you posit everything so well sir , highly influenced by your articulative explanantions thankyou sir🙂

  • @rimalashkari2358
    @rimalashkari2358 4 года назад +1

    In the article 14 they also elaborate the word 'person' which includes legal person, viz, statutory corporation, companies, registered societies or any other type of Legal person.....

  • @sampathr2
    @sampathr2 3 года назад

    Wonderful explanation about CAB. Very simple and vivid. Tks for sharing.

  • @aditipal6053
    @aditipal6053 2 года назад

    Sir darun...apni ki Kolkata e thaken?...I am from north Kolkata...sob theke sundor explaination

  • @_Psycho_Facts
    @_Psycho_Facts 3 года назад

    Sir.... Really ur language of speaking is so soft and comfortable which anyone can understand.... Sir i have a request to u that plz make videos of 11th & 12th class in english of social studies......

  • @pravinnichit3426
    @pravinnichit3426 4 года назад

    Wow..! Short and crisp, fluid and fluent, and still informative and balanced!

  • @RajveerSingh-zq1bo
    @RajveerSingh-zq1bo 4 года назад

    Amit Bhagwan ne apko adbhut aawaj di h....Very Attractive.....I can't explain how much I luv Ur voice

  • @purnimagupta3270
    @purnimagupta3270 4 года назад

    Sir your voice is so clear and the way u explained is too good!!

  • @aditimishra8231
    @aditimishra8231 4 года назад +6

    u'er amazing and one in a million... u'er guidance is a boon

  • @krishangisingh
    @krishangisingh 4 года назад +3

    I fully support CAB 2019 ..there are so many Islamic countries in this world ...they can go anywhere right from Pakistan to Malaysia and middle East ...why to stay in India ??? No way just go where you belong to .

    • @wings_of_fire123
      @wings_of_fire123 4 года назад

      Because this is the unique Nation that every religion has its equal importance and this is the greatness of this country and we have to keep it like that and if you make it a one religion Nation then there will be no difference between Pakistan and India.

    • @sunilsehrawat2574
      @sunilsehrawat2574 4 года назад

      👍👍👍

  • @anumeetsingh6218
    @anumeetsingh6218 4 года назад +3

    Plz upload such informative current based videos more often.

    • @neetumishra1819
      @neetumishra1819 4 года назад +1

      ruclips.net/video/yfWT0D9jQhQ/видео.html

    • @neetumishra1819
      @neetumishra1819 4 года назад +1

      ruclips.net/video/yfWT0D9jQhQ/видео.html

  • @ayushipandey981
    @ayushipandey981 4 года назад +1

    Best explanation for CAB. Thank you so much

  • @aditibarde4083
    @aditibarde4083 4 года назад +1

    Such clarity of thought. Appreciated!

  • @AbhishekKumar-gz9hq
    @AbhishekKumar-gz9hq 4 года назад

    Thanks sir. Your videos are to the point having balanced approach . Saves lots of time.

  • @freejinsfryingpan4haters145
    @freejinsfryingpan4haters145 Год назад

    Thankyou so much sir your words are crystal clear and pronunciation is just 👌 👏

  • @arijitbiswas6478
    @arijitbiswas6478 4 года назад +5

    I don't know why don't you mention "Reasonable classification"!

    • @mohdatif6651
      @mohdatif6651 4 года назад

      It's a different test given by SC here he is explaining only citizenship not RC impact on this

  • @ShubenduMukherjee
    @ShubenduMukherjee 4 года назад

    Thanku so much dada. Crisp and Sorted gist. Loved it.
    Could you please tell me which software do you use for making these notes?

  • @gangubainmegani7616
    @gangubainmegani7616 4 года назад +2

    ಗುರುವೆ ನಿನ್ನ ಅಡಿಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಎನ್ನ ಶತಪ್ರಣಾಮಗಳು 🙏 😅 very helpful sir

  • @harekrishna6229
    @harekrishna6229 4 года назад

    Very clearly explained as well as not taking any side but just presenting facts, thank you

  • @rajk.9098
    @rajk.9098 4 года назад +8

    By this logic Reservation system can also be called as violation of article 14

    • @unsung_tunes
      @unsung_tunes 4 года назад +6

      But further there is an exemption that for upliftment of sc st and obc state and centre has right to make laws for their benefit.।।।।।। Everything is a matter of votebank.।

    • @poushalinag7942
      @poushalinag7942 3 года назад +1

      @@unsung_tunes if it's a matter of votebank, those who can vote are already citizens and by article 10 those who r already citizens cannot be denied citizenship with any law of parliament. So, those people who are already citizens will not have their citizenship cancelled anyhow, which forms the current vote bank.

  • @Muslimahbhat
    @Muslimahbhat 4 года назад +2

    Thank you so much *sir* I was waiting for your class.

  • @kedarp1448
    @kedarp1448 4 года назад +1

    Thanks a lot to for the video. And thumbs up for your neutral stand.... 🤙

  • @worth_considering
    @worth_considering 5 месяцев назад +2

    Here after amendment of CAA!

  • @kanishkrawat9322
    @kanishkrawat9322 4 года назад +2

    CAB will do this to India -
    1. Give citizenship to 34000 people (yes, that's the number that applied for long-term visa)
    2. Prepare the ground for NRC
    3. Put every Indian citizen in a straight line with documents, at Babudom's (or TCS's!) mercy
    4. We'll all wake up in 2030.
    Cheers :)

    • @sunilsehrawat2574
      @sunilsehrawat2574 4 года назад

      @flying to dreams hey if they have documents then no one can throughout them

  • @sakshimehta7838
    @sakshimehta7838 4 года назад +1

    Clear and concise explanation , thank you so much

  • @adarshpaygan645
    @adarshpaygan645 4 года назад +2

    Where Have you been ??? you tobe pe apki frequency km he..sir aap hamare mentor ho 3 saal se..we come to you when there is confusion in NCERT.. THANK YOU SIRJI

  • @Abhishekkumar-ye7co
    @Abhishekkumar-ye7co 4 года назад

    Very well explained sir🙏🙏 absolutely crystal clear. Much appreciated sir

  • @kovurramesh
    @kovurramesh 2 года назад

    It is really fully analysis of topic exploration. I am so much impressed sir....thank you thank you so much....

  • @googoogaga8566
    @googoogaga8566 4 года назад +3

    Aahhh your voice is so smooth😩👑

  • @debobratamandal5415
    @debobratamandal5415 3 года назад +1

    Sir can you please explain WBCS main question paper pattern and language barrier I mean to say in what language I can answer,,can I used Bengali there??? If you give my question's answer then I will be highly thankful to you.

  • @prosantomukerji3931
    @prosantomukerji3931 2 года назад

    Thanks, Amit Sengupta.

  • @naagraj9252
    @naagraj9252 4 года назад +8

    Sir please history ke mordern history ka please 🙏🙏🙏

  • @joharali9239
    @joharali9239 4 года назад +14

    One thing i found nonsense and want a clarification is that you said both countries were created based on religion.... I think India was from the beginning itself a secular country and that is why we don't have a state religion...

    • @ridhamvyas4104
      @ridhamvyas4104 4 года назад +10

      The word "secular" was added during the emergency,and as amit sir has said, partition happened on the bases of religion, it's the fact whether you like it or not

    • @joharali9239
      @joharali9239 4 года назад +3

      @@ridhamvyas4104 pakistan did formed because of religious ideology not India and second thing is that secular word was added in the preamble later on but you can find it in fundamental rights and DPSP as well which I think u are forgetting...

    • @rimalashkari2358
      @rimalashkari2358 4 года назад

      Yess India was a secular country that's way many leaders opposed the partition at that time and they tried each and everything to not to detache a part from it called Pakistan....but it's the Jinna sir who's obstinate behaviour of creating Pakistan was there to carv out Muslims and create an Islamic state......u may read from the history

    • @niteshthakur9325
      @niteshthakur9325 10 месяцев назад

      No, only one country made on a religious basis

    • @Sv-iophj90
      @Sv-iophj90 8 месяцев назад

      Then India will provide all her rights to the people over the whole world right? Who will provide that infrastructure? I hope it's you. 😂

  • @lubnaabid9694
    @lubnaabid9694 4 года назад +3

    I thought it talked about only persecuted minorities. But you have mentioned illegal migrants. Is it going to save all hindus declared illegal migrant in Assam NRC?

    • @lubnaabid9694
      @lubnaabid9694 4 года назад

      @Shikha Singh I am sorry but you are not clear. Please elaborate. 25000 ppl have what to prove what ? And how does that answer my question.
      The last thing I want to have is an argument with some stupid. It was a genuine question and not to you . It was meant for Amit sir who had made this video.

    • @lubnaabid9694
      @lubnaabid9694 4 года назад

      @Shikha Singh oh you are right. My mistake. Replace hindus with ppl belonging from six religions under this act.

  • @upanisadinfinite
    @upanisadinfinite 2 года назад

    Article 14 : I think this Article does not apply to the foreign indigenous people. It directly says " The state shall not deny to any person's equality before the law " WITHIN THE INDIAN TERRITORY." Means NOT OUTSIDE THE COUNTRY.

  • @samsindhi269
    @samsindhi269 4 года назад

    Excellent sir thank you for the efforts....very clear and unbiased as always hatts off

  • @AnkitaYadav-sv8ix
    @AnkitaYadav-sv8ix 4 года назад

    Sir your voice is so clear thanks for giving your effort😊😊😊

  • @justmusicthing6298
    @justmusicthing6298 4 года назад +1

    No CAB in NORTHEAST
    ...forget about religions
    We don't care what religions are those migrants from.
    If the parliament wants to impose CAB then impose in the mainland.
    Thank you

    • @madhuhitesh88
      @madhuhitesh88 4 года назад

      It's applicable in entire India not only north east . But north east will be mostly effected as there are many numbers of refugees from Bangladesh. Get your facts rights before barking and stop believing fake news

  • @Karryon798
    @Karryon798 4 года назад +2

    You cleared all my confusion!!

  • @letsstudywithsubstance26
    @letsstudywithsubstance26 4 года назад +1

    Sir thank you. Beautifully explained.

  • @Cathy0617
    @Cathy0617 4 года назад

    This was very much needed. Thanks!

  • @rameshas9053
    @rameshas9053 4 года назад +1

    Well explained sir
    We need more lectures really helpful 🖤

  • @azualingente
    @azualingente 3 года назад +1

    Finally in English 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

  • @relentless3727
    @relentless3727 4 года назад +6

    Sir, please make a time line in modern history... After Advent of Europeans

  • @kshamasharma4431
    @kshamasharma4431 4 года назад +1

    Your accent is fusion of UK +Australian+Indian it is quite pleasant to hear you anytime thanks for these valuable videos sir.

  • @bethuzalen1854
    @bethuzalen1854 4 года назад

    Sir,i like urTeaching never miss ur videos thanks for the video👍👍

  • @upscjourneypk
    @upscjourneypk 2 года назад

    Very crisp and detailed. I really like it.

  • @tejkarlapudi5773
    @tejkarlapudi5773 4 года назад

    Brilliant absolutely brilliant. Thank you. I finally understood what the whole fuss is about.

  • @ritanshitrivedi4278
    @ritanshitrivedi4278 3 года назад +1

    Thank you so much

  • @mayurinaskar5237
    @mayurinaskar5237 4 года назад +21

    I strongly oppose this bill....this is Jinnah two nations theory part 2.

    • @neetumishra1819
      @neetumishra1819 4 года назад +1

      ruclips.net/video/yfWT0D9jQhQ/видео.html

    • @Diqrah_Ilaan
      @Diqrah_Ilaan 4 года назад +4

      Yes strongly oppose

    • @mayurinaskar5237
      @mayurinaskar5237 4 года назад +11

      @HANUDAS 🤣🤣🤣 I know you are an #andhbhakt...🤟

    • @cultcinema8542
      @cultcinema8542 4 года назад +4

      @@mayurinaskar5237 nhi sudhar sakte aise log😂 #chutiyabhakt

    • @ganeshojha2086
      @ganeshojha2086 4 года назад +2

      Human rights is only for Islamist, No one even talk about suffering of these minorities in islamic countries because they are not muslims. Why Only We hindus have burden to be secular and care for Islamist.

  • @varshasailwal3195
    @varshasailwal3195 3 года назад

    Clear, concise and informative.

  • @mohammadrafique5116
    @mohammadrafique5116 4 года назад +2

    8:59 sir if the non-Indian person will get citizenship of India than he/she will become the person of India (means they have constitutional rights). AND after it the person claim that he/she got citizenship due to his/her Religion ..... THATS CLEARLY VIOLATE THE ARTICLE 14.......

    • @arundhatiroy666
      @arundhatiroy666 4 года назад +5

      It's apply on or all religion except Muslim bcoz they already separate from India bcoz of religion bases... They want citizenship... They can apply by legal process

    • @webenglishretinarevision4944
      @webenglishretinarevision4944 2 года назад

      @@arundhatiroy666 r8

  • @VARINDERSINGH-zn8mp
    @VARINDERSINGH-zn8mp 4 года назад +1

    Sir i say searialy your voice is effective and attractive . this is good way to teach . before watch this video I cover geography from you chanle thanks

  • @EVALUATIONIASANTHROPOLOGYESSAY
    @EVALUATIONIASANTHROPOLOGYESSAY 4 года назад

    superrrrrrrr ......best educator ....please cover current comprehensively amit sir

  • @atulkhaire8726
    @atulkhaire8726 4 года назад

    Awesome Video Sirr
    Keep making videos on Critical Topics
    Thank you

  • @gitikaswami6928
    @gitikaswami6928 2 года назад

    Mind-blown by the crispness of the data.

  • @ramanareddy2308
    @ramanareddy2308 4 года назад +1

    One doubt as per u said in this video ahmadiya muslims agreed for pakistan creation so they r not allowed to claim citizenship in india today then the hindus and other religious communities stayed in Pakistan after partition surely they r pakistan citizens or other countries wherever they are staying or citizens of that nationality how come indian people and indian resources should be given to people based on religion when the existing resources are insufficient for our own indian people and what's the point in bringing in such act or amendment at present? Irrespective of religion so called communities in three countries are nationals or citizens of their countries just because they are hindu or so can't be indian citizen? Please clarify my doubt am confused ?

  • @elamzaihau
    @elamzaihau 4 года назад +2

    Thank you so much sir... i finally got the full idea and knowledge of CAA CAB NRC.Hope to learn more with you. Your New Subscribe. Please do more videos like this related to UPSC.

  • @inderjeet8178
    @inderjeet8178 4 года назад +1

    Many #Respect for you, Sir!!
    Thanks for the video!!
    Please if possible make video on India's foreign policy😅🙏
    Best regards

  • @mukthan2835
    @mukthan2835 4 года назад

    Your videos are very educative n helpful thank u sir

  • @Deaduser28-n7w
    @Deaduser28-n7w 4 года назад

    Thanks sir..u explained it well..I couldnt get a better explanation.

  • @karishmamore2660
    @karishmamore2660 4 года назад +2

    Sir if possible, make video on cases mentioned in M Laxmikant

    • @neetumishra1819
      @neetumishra1819 4 года назад +1

      ruclips.net/video/yfWT0D9jQhQ/видео.html

  • @gurudutt8838
    @gurudutt8838 4 года назад

    VERY NICELY EXPLAINED ...PLZ PROVIDE MORE SUCH CONTAINTS SIR

  • @sasmitasahoo9015
    @sasmitasahoo9015 4 года назад

    Very good explanation👍👍👍👍