Zohd Dart XL 2
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 сен 2024
- Download my iNav OSD fonts Vision here, in 4 sizes : bit.ly/2RJ0QnW
► FLYING WING : Zohd Dart XL Extreme bit.ly/2S693zl
iNav settings : bit.ly/2Eu0omf
Wingspan : 100cm
Total weight : 1220gr
Flight time : 20-30 minutes
Flight controller : STM32 Matek F405-Wing, software iNav 2.0.1 bit.ly/2BwzzdY
GPS : BN-880 bit.ly/2GpkyjZ
Radio system : FrSky Horus X12S R9M, R9slim+ 868MHz bit.ly/2Ck8Cfq
FPV transmitter : 5.8GHz Eachine TX526 bit.ly/2R12TTJ
FPV 5.8Ghz antenna : Foxeer Lollipop bit.ly/2BvewJ4
Onboard HD camera : Foxeer Legend HD v2+ 1440-30p bit.ly/2CluPK5
Onboard FPV camera : Foxeer HS1177 v2 CCD PAL 2.8mm bit.ly/2EvgKLh
Motor : Zohd 2216 1300kV
Propeller : HQprop 9x4.5
Speed controller : Red Brick 50A Opto bit.ly/2CkgL3i
Batteries : 1x Li-Po 5S-3000mAh or 1x Li-Po 4S-3300mAh
► FPV goggles : Fatshark HD v1 bit.ly/2A1eIzt
Video module : FuriousFPV True-D 3.8 diversity receiver bit.ly/2SSK6Hu
Antenna #1 : Aomway 11db 7 turns helical bit.ly/2S7z1T7
Antenna #2 : Foxeer CP Omni bit.ly/2Cltinb
![Eminem - Fuel (Shady Edition) feat. Westside Boogie & GRIP [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/k1OquBida9s/mqdefault.jpg)
Hey, Oliver. You took a very nice shot.
I don't understand anything about flying, but I'm fascinated by all this: D
now need to let the manufacturer know and they can update and do a V2 with your recommended modifications . Excellent video
Looks wobbly, I thought this was almost eliminated with this wing...
A plane cannot fix the wind :)
Nice work, the increased P and D values were interesting, on my Z84 the P values as suggested are very low in comparison.
Given up on my R9MM receiver at the moment, the 868mhz standard Firmware is just not working, RSSI at only 500mtrs is dropping as low as 50, hopeless. My XM plus on 2.4G is good for 5 kms.
Keen to see it fly again as you iron out the wrinkles.
Mine was ironed out from day one and I just threw a FatShark 1.3GHz 250mW VTX and EzUHF RX in there. Oh and of course, a Vector. I've already had mine out to a mile on the 2nd flight.
I can't set up my flaps on opentx and inav.
Bonjour
Le setting que tu donnes pour Inav, fonctionne directement sur la 2.3.0 ?
Car j'adore tes settings, celui de la z84 est top .
Un grand bravo pour ton boulot sur Inav.
Salut et merci! Oui les settings sont ok pour INAV 2.3 ou 2.4, il n'y a pas beaucoup de difference entre ces versions coté CLI
Thank you the thorough review.
Disappointing and surprising to hear the the L9 is so susceptible to noise. I have a Crossfire nano rx on my iNav nano Goblin. It's a very tight build, all the electronics and FC are sitting right next to each other, but I have zero interference issues with anything.
Since this video I removed the factory servos for some Emax, and no more interferences
@@Olivier-C good to know! Looks like a great plane. I'm considering one myself.
Trop chouette...👍👍👍
Awesome plane. Love it :)
Looking a lot better! There's a little yaw instability (like many wings)? Wonder if fitting the wing fences would make any difference?
It was'nt too bad to be honest, also there was a weird wind blowing random, will know more when the plane is flown on a calmer day. Maybe I'll add 1 or 2 of these at the end of the wing tips. Not where they are planned for sure, I see no point near the leading edge.
Elle fait quand même un peu toc / à la mini Drack ; mais tu vas sans doute gagner en autonomie.
Hi Oliver! Cool video! Why don't you take RSSI from S port?
Thanks! I often test beta firmware builds for the Frsky R9, some have RSSI, or Fport builds etc, others are not. I'm always sure the RSSI analog output is indeed outputting RSSI, whatever the version.
Yours didn't seem to pitch up under throttle as much h as others I've seen, maybe because you don't use the vortex generators. like the new hatch. Quite noisy, trailing edge resonating?
The flight controller deals with any pitch business, it's his job to keep the plane level. The motor angle could be like 20° up or down, I would barely notice. I tried few minutes in full manual mode, didn't feel any weird stuff, but there was a lot of wind so cannot tell for sure.
Salut Olivier. J'ai lu plus de 100 pages sur Rcgroups et j ai vu tous tes posts. Au sujet du Vtx et Rx que je vais aussi mettre dans les ailes, conseilles tu de grouper les masses au niveau des prises d'ailes ? Si je veux mettre le SBUS et le Smartport par exemple (4 fils au lieu de 3) J'ai vu que tu avais fait ça pour 5 fils. Est ce dangereux pour l electronique ?
. Merci
Oui j'ai fait les piquages 5V et GND sur la prise d'aile, c'est le plus simple je pense. Ca evite d'avoir à repiquer sur le fil de servo. Ca craint rien, à part que les servos d'origine sont sensibles aux interferences, et faudra peut-etre les emballer à l'aluminium, ou alors les torsader. Perso je les ai changé, trop sensibles au 900MHz
Merci @@Olivier-C ! Derniere question, la place Vtx et RX en bout d'aile est le meilleur endroit pour les 2 d'après tes expériences ou mieux vaut mettre le Vtx dans le capot ventilé ?
@@GuiOhm_FR D'experience, le VTX n'a pas tellement tendance à perturber le reste de l'electronique, donc oui si il chauffe beaucoup ça peut etre bien de le mettre la ou c'est ventilé. Par contre les RX, surtout les 900Mhz, plus on peut les mettre loin mieux c'est, si on prévoit d'aller un peu loin.
Merci Olivier. Je ne pense pas que cela va desequilibrer l'aile si le Rx est sur une seule et rien sur l autre
Aprés avoir vue la V1 me voila rassuré !