Roland Jupiter-8 | Can a synth be worth this kind of money?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- Is the Roland Jupiter-8 really worth what the market is commanding these days? In my opinion, not a chance. It's a fantastic synth, but no synth is worth those prices, musically.
Of course, any object is worth whatever anyone is willing pay. That's the whole idea behind capitalism, but again, not musically. Period.
The way it looks made it the obvious "poster" synth to be used in all those music videos in the 80s and that has made it so desirable, the looks. That's my firm belief. If you want the Jupiter-8 sound in a hardware form without going bust, get the MKS-80.
Again, a big thanks to Joakim Tysseng for letting me enjoy it for so long. Thanks man!
Support this channel on Patreon:
/ espenkraft
Reverb used in this video: Valhalla VintageVerb & Lexicon 480L
Find my music here:
iTunes Apple music: apple.co/35ZTdfR
Spotify: spoti.fi/38aoWMB
Bandcamp: espenkraft.ban...
Google Play: bit.ly/2NrgXD9
Find my patches and sample packs through these links:
thepatchbay.co...
sound7.co.uk/p...
My favourite Jupiter. Like you, I borrow them from generous people. I also weap when I hear what they paid for them 20 years ago, but the prices now are not a reflection of what the instrument actually is, as you were saying.
Thanks for the shout out btw.
My pleasure Alex, keep going! :)
I'd have to play around with the CS80 for some time to be able to give a solid assessment of it, but of course it's not worth 100K, for the sounds it can make or otherwise. As a desirable object it can of course fetch such sums, but not from me. ;-)
About 8 years ago I was always on the hunt for these soviet "Jupiter 8" camera lenses, having to scroll through these weirdly coloured keyboards was annoying. I seem to remember they weren't even a quarter of the price they are now. Now I'm sitting in front of my late father's Jupiter 4 and I totally get it.
@@ProSimex84 Love the Jupiter 4 but it's a totally different beast and truly unique. Arguably Roland's strongest character synth. Check out this video if you want to find out what makes it sound so special -
ruclips.net/video/_AuU-8udv3w/видео.html
@@ProSimex84 The Jupiter 8 might be nice but soundwise I would prefer the Jupiter 4 (although the prices are much too high for me for this wonderful instrument).
I met the great Andy Richards circa 1988 when I purchased my new Fairlight Series III. He came to my studio to perform the set up and initiation - a man of massive talent and inspiration.
Sounds like an awesome day. :)
@@EspenKraft I recall you had a video comparing an MKS80 to this JP8, A/B testing patches, but I can't find that video now. What is the title? Thank you.
I own one and it is not only a very capable and beautiful sounding instrument, it is a piece of history as arguably the greatest analog poly of all time. You haven’t lived until you built a bass patch and pressed the Unison button.
can I borrow it
@@westbethkid I had a crazy idea actually for a product that allowed synth owners to rent out their synths over the internet. Like Access Analog but for synthesizers. All of us collectors could put our beasts to work when we weren’t using them! How cool would that be.
@@williamtell1477 I thought about that too. Some places actually do something like this - typically studios or music stores. But you could allow people to connect to your synths over the internet and get the audio out fairly easily these days albeit it with latency so real time playing would be a challenge.
@@williamtell1477 I think that's a great idea--the problem is if they damage it--some kind of insurance would be necessary...
@@chrismurphy9750 I have a Juno 60, and it sounds cool blah blah blah--but I'm sure that the Roland boutique version is super close... Maybe someone sends a keyboard part played on another instrument, and the owner of the "supersynth" plays the part and sends it back? Not sure if this is a great business model
I‘ll never understand Roland. The P5 Rev4 and the OB-X8 clearly prove that there’s a market for reissues of legendary vintage *analogue* synths, not only wannabes like the ZenCore stuff.
What many don’t understand is that they’re simply too expensive to reproduce.
@@vukpavlovic5617 Of course the actual enhanced replicas aren’t cheap, still by far less expensive than the original vintage gear plus a lot of maintenance. I‘m sure there are people who‘d spend 7 or 8k for a modern Jupiter-8; they do pay it for a Moog One.
Roland just doesn’t have the in-house analogue know-how to pull off such a project since a long time ago. The know chip design but they ditched discreet electronics 25 years ago. For the System-500 they had to partner with Malekko and for the SE-02 boutique they worked with Studio Electronics. I’m sure they wished they could re-release the Jupe 8 and even the SH-5. But don’t hold your breath on that ever happening. We’ll have to do with the System-8.
@@juanespinosa1259 Good point. Ikutaro Kakehashi, who had the know-how, already died in 2017, while Dave Smith and Tom Oberheim carried on until this year (and Tom hopefully even longer).
In fairness I'd say it's be hard to tell the difference between the two on a blind test. Though this does sound amazing
Take the four most sought after programmable polysynths from the 80's--the Jupiter-8, OB-Xa, Prophet 5, and Memorymoog--and compare them feature for feature. The Jupiter is the only one that checks all these boxes: Bi-timbral (the Prophet and Memorymoog aren't), oscillator cross mod (the OB-Xa doesn't have it), and an arpeggiator (the OB-Xa and Prophet-5 don't have one). It's arguably the most reliable of the bunch as well, which along with its versatility may explain why it commands a premium over the others.
My first three analog synths were all Rolands: First the Juno-106, then the JX-8P, and finally the Jupiter-8. The Jupiter is the only one I kept. It's nothing special in Whole mode, but it sounds massive in Dual mode with the same patch selected for upper and lower when the left and right outputs are used, as Espen illustrates at the beginning of this video. If that isn't fat enough for you, try mixing in the mono output run through a true bucket brigade stereo chorus with only the wet signal output--I use the Boss CE-300 Super Chorus with the Direct Mute switch on. It adds even more movement between the left and right channels.
It's the dual mode that is the fun of the Jup8, totally agree. That and the arp. I find the arp of the Jup-8 very musical and playable, more so than any other synth.
One of my favorite synthesizers ever, and I just got it this year for an unbelievably low price ($700) in pristine condition, all white keys and no blemishes. In short, the person did not know what they had and probably didn't bother to Google it. Such a workhorse, and man is it heavy. No plugin could ever replicate the low end that this monster produces, it truly was the flagship of its time and still holds up to this day. I'm incredibly lucky to own one, let alone have played one in my lifetime.
You sir, must have one of the best poker faces ever.
It was a choice of an JP8 or first car for me back in the day. I worked and got a Mini Cooper S as my father had always had minis. I'd still love a JP8 though.
One of the all time classics. Amazing but no way I'd pay 30k for a synth even if I could
I own an Jupiter 8 12 Bit with Grooves Midi and 8 Bank expansion since 1992 which i bought for 1050 Deutschmark.. It will never Leave me. Some VSTs are Sounding nearly the same. But sitting in font of a JP8 an playing it and the workflow isn't replaceable.
100%. I have quite a few vintages my self and software is pretty much as good honestly but the inspiration and joy the real thing gives you no software can give you.
Great video as usual Espen! If you lived closer, you could borrow mine although not for a year and a half - generous friend! There are a lot of ways to get the sound these days so everyone can enjoy it. But like you said there is something about the look and the physical knobs. With VST emulations becoming better and better, someone should just make the hardware case that looks just like it and use it to control a VST.
You simply don't understand that the green LED monster was made in heaven for cool guys wearing sunglasses all the time.
Thanks for the offer! I'm done with this now and I don't need to play one again.
I owned, played and recorded a little with the JP8 some 10+ years ago. I totally agree with Espen. The combination of sonic quality, power and ease of use makes it incredibly inspiring to use. That's what you pay for.
I actually used to have one of these. 25 years ago I tried to sell it and couldn't give it away. Now I wish I had it.
Hi Espen. Agreed, the prices on this synth are out of control.
I agree with you, Espen. It's a solid synth, to be sure, but I've always felt it was a bit generic sounding - many different ways to get the sound these days, and even some vintage Roland (MKS-70 and JX3P can get close for some, MKS-80 and Jupiter 6 get pretty close too) - but 30K is just not musically justifiable. I'm a bit of a collector (I own a Jupiter 6 for example), and even I can't justify spending that kind of money. So I'm not denying that it's useful and even good sounding with a great versatility, but no way at that price.
Every year there are only ever FEWER of them. Of those, there are only ever few that are in working order. It's sad but also amazing that a synthesizer once that proliferated the used section of the music shop and dusty stock areas came back in value with a VENGEANCE.
It sounds so generic, it's actually it's signature. Very cleverly done by Roland and core to it's usefulness in actual mixes.
Great video, loved the opening... am I the only one who gets a pang of nostalgia hearing it? I'm pretty sure its been scientifically proven that the release of the Jupiter 8 was the pinnacle of humanity's achievements, beating out the invention of the steam engine and the moon landing by a healthy margin!
Cheers!
Possibly. Maybe. Definitely. 😁
The TR-808 and 909 were more useful to humanity as it meant that drummers had to get proper jobs down the coal mine, and artists could make music without drummers, just as God intended.
I've never thought of hearing the Terminator theme on a Jup-8 as I know the original was done on an Oberheim, but it totally worked!
As for Jupiter-8s and the secondhand prices - as lovely as it sounds - and looks, we need more colourful synths! - it wouldn't be impossible to recreate these sounds with similarly-specced polysynths, either real or virtual.
And the Jup-8, being around 40 years ago and counting, is going to need maintenance too at some point, so there's that...
Thanks for Video. Yes the Roland Jupiter 8 sound great but i would not willing to pay so much as just hobby musician for the original geaervin good condition. So thats why i still happy to have the Roland Jupiter8, Juno-106 and JX-3P Sound in my Roland System-8. For me personal they Sound great in the System-8 and i spare als space in my small Flat to have 3 classic Roland Synths in 1 Keyboard.
Cheers!
Great video! They have become investment assets as the Gibson goldtop synth and are overpriced IMHO. I never got on with mine, no velocity of aftertouch, massive weight and heat, sounded like a poly SH-2, so I was pleased to sell it - 25 years ago for under £1k, with a MKS80 replacing it. Owning a JX-8P at the time really made a difference, not the exact same sound but lots of expression and patch naming. The Jupiter 8 is a fantastic technical achievement, massive thanks to the Roland dev team from 1981, and I am sure we can keep them going with the new AS662 and AS3109 chips. ☺️☺️
Thanks!
I owned the MKS-80 w/ MPG-80 and sold it. Just didn't get along with it. Felt I had to use it in 4-voice mode too much.
Amazing synth for sure, but most of us average joe's with average income may never be able to afford to even touch a Jupiter 8 - so it makes it hard to say. I do have vintage instruments that are worth money, but I have a hard time justifying any music instrument that costs almost as much as a low mileage used car LOL! In the past few years, anything retro or vintage has gone up tremndously in price and that trend may stay awhile. In the meantime, us average joes live thru folks like you Espen who generously share their time and resources so we can get an accurate idea of amazing synths like this one. Keep up the good work my friend.
Cheers!
I paid 5000 quid for mine in 2012 and thought that was outrageous. It is probably the most overrated synth of all time. It doesn't really sound anywhere near like the hype would have you believe. It's just that the whole of music industry has become a big collectors arena unfortunately and hype is an essential component of driving the price up.
I agree it's not worth the current price. It sure sounds great, but at the end of the day it's just a 2 VCO, 8 voice polysynth with a fairly standard architecture. You pay a premium because it's a rare and iconic collector's item, but objectively as a musical instrument there isn't enough to set it apart from synths that are a fraction of its price.
One of the Best Looking & Sounding Synths Ever..... I think this Video will only make it go higher in price 😆
Ah, I feel for you. It's a beautiful instrument, but you know that you'll never pay the crazy asking prices, so this is really it.
For me, there are two kinds of synths that command absurd prices. The first kind is the likes of the Jupiter-8, Prophet 5, etc, because they're lovely instruments and everybody wants them. Personally, I'm convinced that it's the rich sound of the Jupiter-8 that made me fall in love with synthesisers.
The second kind of crazy prices synths are the likes of the Yamaha FS1R, Kawai K5000 and Ensoniq Fizmo. Those prices are high because they are rare. But then you have to wonder why they're rare, and that's because nobody bought them when they came on the market. And the logical next question is: why didn't anybody buy them? Were people in the 1990s all deluded?
No, nobody bought them because they're essentially useless in a mix. They're just too weird. And that basic fact hasn't changed in the past 25 years.
In conclusion, I do yearn for that Jupiter-8 sound, but I'm not willing to part with the kind of money that bought me a brand new car in 2013. And while the synth will retain its value and more, contrary to the car, it's just too much.
I've an idea about Yamaha and Kawai, for Yamaha the main problem is the difficult FM synthesis and for Kawai the brand is underrated a bit like Casio while both of them produced great synths. Remember in the 90's new brands and new synthesis appeared like Quasimidi or the Roland JP8000 (a virtual analog one) just to name two. For Ensoniq after the disastrous VFX serie, not because the transwave synthesis didn't produce super sounds but it wasn't reliable at all. My VFX SD died after a fatal overheating and we were many to have this ptoblem so I have never bought Ensoniq again (E-MU did ;-) )
@@Brumairevideo Thing is, I demoed all three in the shop: the FS1R, the K5000S and the Fizmo. None of them convinced me with my hard-earned cash.
Mind, I'm not contradicting any of your statements, but this is my personal experience, and I'm willing to bet that I wasn't the only one not overly impressed by the sounds.
Like the CS-80, the Jupiter-8 has a soul - very few synths have one.
I think Roland has made it pretty clear that they have no interest in designing new analog synths or investing in a team of analog circuit designers (not programmers). Despite what viewers of this channel may think, most people are plenty ok with just having emulations.
As long as people continue to buy emulation hardware synths, and collectors/analog cork sniffers lust after the original hardware, these will only continue to increase in price. Aging components and expensive repairs will also continue to influence the price.
It is a great synth! Maybe to me the greatest ever🥰 Totally agree it’s about history for many rather than its sound/capabilities, only very rich would pay for an original on now.... totally beyond reason why Roland haven’t met this demand and remade it (not just digital versions). Great you’ve had your hands on one for a while!
Roland won't chase the analog synth-ghosts of the past...but they will cash in on their name, lol.
@@Aetila yes, even though I'm a big roland fan it seems pretty hypocritical stance to take I think.
Great sounds! What is the more affordable alternative and closest synth to the Jupiter-8 soundwise?
MKS-80 is my choice.
I agree that the JP8 is not worth the current price, but neither are a lot of items sold through Sotherby's. You have to want this like a piece of fine art, and it is one of the most beautiful synths ever made in my opinion. There's also a sort of prestige that goes with owning one. I wouldn't trade my OB8 for it however.
The MKS-80 is your option for not going bust?? Heartily disagree - those are going for upwards of $5,000! If you want a piece of hardware that gives you the genuine Jupiter-8 sound, you need to look at the System-8.
Yes, if you're into emulations that is an option.
I wouldn’t take a system 8 if it was free.
@@phillymopwater I would :)
The MKS-80 is easier to find and a better choice overall.
The Roland Jupiter 8 is the Ferrari of synths. I owed one when they were new and words cannot describe what it was like to own one. Music heaven! 😎
"my time with the Roland Jupiter 8 is now coming to an end" --probably the saddest sentence I've ever heard on RUclips 🤔 😥
I'm not sad so no tears necessary. ;-)
This is the only synth I remember having seen as a kid. The reason is obvious: the colours make it look like a toy.
Buying one, maintaining it, having it repaired, ... indeed not worth the ridiculous asking price.
lol, some one on ebay just now trying to flog it for £27,500 ... what the actual f....
That's quite low actually so it should go very quick with that price.
I LOVE your interpretation of the Terminator theme that you did there! Sounds great Espen!
Thanks!
@@EspenKraftI really wish it was longer! I keep playing it on repeat!
Relax by Frankie Goes to Hollywood really is a great example of what the Jupiter-8 can do best, in my opinion. It has some amazing Linndrum programming aswell. Awesome that you mentioned it! The Jupiter-8 indeed isn't worth the price at all, but looking at its history and the amount of songs that it was used in, it still is a dream synth of mine, no matter what the price. I'm glad that you've been able to enjoy the Jupiter-8 for so long! Great video as always Espen!
Thanks Luka! It's a classic for a reason for sure. So many hits, especially from the early 80s. I'll miss it more for the looks than anything else though. ;-)
That was produced by Trevor Horn who also had a Synclavier setup. So I don't think it's just Jupiter 8.
@@6581punk The Fairlight was in the mix too. The bass sound includes a piano sample from the Fairlight.
@@6581punk Yeah I believe that he used a Fairlight to sample the kick of the Linndrum combined with a single note on the piano to create the body of the bassline. Almost all the other parts were pretty much recorded with the Jupiter-8 I think.
I ordered my Jupiter-8 with Encore MIDI back in the 90ies from Jean Michel Jarre Studio Paris. Sold it for 2,2k to get a brandnew Nordlead in 1995. I am fine with my Nordlead today, so no regret.
😳
When I was 16 I was looking for my first synth, I remember the Jupiter 6 (not the 8) cost 32000 Francs (I'd say DM 20000 in mid 80's, at this price you got a small car). Of course I couldn't afford it. The Jupiter 8 even cost more but didn't have the MIDI implementation just the DCB system. Well I thought I could buy it later cheaper but the price remains super high on the second hand market. So I bought the Jupiter XM 2 years ago as it sounds great and gives even more with its 5 machines in one. I only kept it few months because I realized I was mistaken, I wanted it for the vintage Roland sounds and it makes it great but finally I didn't use it much, these kind of sounds I loved when I was teenager didn't fit anymore with the kind of music I want to do. And if I want an analog sound like a JP8 I can get it easily with one my digital softwares. I can't say if the JP8 is overpriced because this is the law of the market but check the price here it's crazy! With 25000 euros you can get so many valuable vintage machines, we have to think twice before buying. It's my humble opinion fr.audiofanzine.com/synthe-analogique/roland/jupiter-8/petites-annonces/
It's a firm classic, and the numbers of working models dwindle each year. Scarcity pushes the price up, and the most wealthy and successful musicians want to keep one around after their own one breaks.
It’s a beautiful example of its genre and there’s no doubting the quality. Does it sound as amazing as values would suggest? Not in my opinion. But then, I’m not a huge analogue nut. I prefer digital as that’s what I grew up with and the tonal palette is much greater than analogue. Many later synths can get as phat as the Jupiter. Lovely instrument though it is, the prices are pure speculation and grossly exaggerated.
Oh...how I use to drool over this KB in the early 1980's!!!
.
There is a "Rolland" Jupiter 6 on Ebay right now for £27.500 in very nice condition. A bit steep I must admit.
they had one in the guitar center near me recently for like 6k.
Relax.. how can such a profane song be so awesome.
Have you seen the original video? It's massive.
@@Michael_Smith-Red_No.5 Once.. and I had to wash my eyeballs with soap and water afterwards.
If Sequential could produce a Prophet 5/10 Rev4, and now Oberheim an OB-X8, what’s stopping Roland doing the same with the Jupiter-8 … it’s not like it runs on fairy dust and rocking horse poo 🙄 … Do you think it is just a matter of time until Roland does so, Espen?
I don't think they ever will. Roland is now a company that exists for consumers. In the past they were a company for musicians.
Roland don't "chase ghosts". But are happy to use the cachet of the Juno 106 aesthetic :)
Roland Jupiter 8 is the King of Synths.
Bought a new one in 1981. It's a good one as synths of the analogue nature go. But it's not worth anything instrisically today. Anything is only worth what anyone is willing to pay for it.
Now. who'd imagine the Jupiter 8 could even sound like Holly Johnson?
Lol, I thought the same thing.
Goosebumps all over my body! ❤️🍻
Excellent choice of attire for this presentation. The sartorial taste you demonstrate here is parallel to your taste in synths, Espen. The watch with the webbed band is a particularly pleasing and sophisticated accent piece which echos the synth: a literally analogue timepiece with literal complementary colors to that of the both shirt and the Jupiter's predominant color scheme, as well as which match the synth's own accent colors. This is recursive Sound and Vision, kinda like an album cover that just looks the way the music sounds. Well done all around! 🙌👏👏👏
Many thanks for noticing. I appreciate it as I always try to match up the visuals in my videos, sometimes subtle, sometimes more obvious. ;-)
FGTH was great example, back in the day I used my MKS80 to recreate the sounds, sampled some into EII, sequenced others w mc500 for live gigs.
Like many other Roland synths: It's all about the chorus, isn't it?
Well, depends on what chorus you put on it, as the Jupiter-8 has no chorus on it's own. ;-)
The Roland Cloud version just got an important 2.0 update, because in addition to the age/condition knob there's also a circuit mod knob that adjusts through different component variations and it makes such a big difference in how much more organic it sounds now.
I did a patch bank for the V2 of the Jupiter-8 recently. You'll find it at Roland Cloud and I did a video about it too. It's right here on the channel.
Great sounds ! Thank you for the amazing demonstration.
Cheers!
I really love the Jupiter and Juno lines, but holy cheeses, the prices people are asking these days is INSANE!
As a collector's item, maybe a Jupiter 8 is worth $2000 - $3000, but even still, that's a high price. As a studio or performance tool, you can get a similar-sounding and functioning contemporary instrument for much much less.
Its worth what it sells for though, thats how markets work. Price can go up or down based on supply (only getting lower) and demand (at a peak last year for sure). "I would not pay X" is a more useful way to think about it than "its not worth X" in my opinion.
@@williamtell1477 there's a sucks born everyday. Just because someone paid x doesn't mean it's worth it.
adjusting for inflation, it’s new price today would be closer to 20k. We’re spoiled for mass production/modern capitalism prices.
@@phillymopwater expecting a synth in today's world to less 20k is not spoiled. It's commonsense
I remember lusting after a Ferrari Testarossa when they cost a hundred grand. I still don't have the money for one, but even if I did, there are about a thousand better - and more practical - cars I'd spend the money on first. Even back in the day, Ferrari owners said the Testarossa was a pig to drive around town. I shouldn't think 40 years of rust and corrosion would improve the matter!
Overrated? HECK NO! Too expensive? Yes, because it's now a collector's item, and people buy them to collect and as investments, not to use.
As a person lucky enough to have owned a Jupiter 8 since 1998 when you could buy one cheap. I paid $300 USD with Anvil flight case, I wasn't the first person to look look at it and the seller had even lowered the price to get rid of it. Not uncommon at the time. I think the current prices are for several reasons and not just its sound. The number made, who used them and the number of hit songs they were on. But mostly the number made. If it were the number or hit songs, then the DX7 should be worth the same or more. Just just my opinion. Also, we can't forget that vintage analog synths are in vogue right now.
As for same sound with other gear, newer gear, I was editing some sounds on my Roland VR-730 on my iPad. It has several factory preset sound labeled JP-8: Strings, Brass, Bass ect. I told the app the "read" the settings. In the case of JP-8 Strings the patch used the Super Saw wave sightly detuned on 2 of the 3 partials (oscillators in the SuperNatural Engine) and chorus in the effects. I can't remember exactly which effect and the instrument isn't handy for me to check and see right now. The point is that there's, of course, no super saw on the JP-8. I think Roland introduced that on the JP-8000. In reality, it's just one of many string sounds in that instrument that will either fit your needs or not. Does it sound like a Jupiter 8? Well there's me something to do a video on. I would say it would be close enough. I'll have to set them up see how close I can get the Jupe to sound like the VR. Same for the FA-08 I have as it share the same sound engine and, from what I can tell, some of the same presets as the VR.
And lastly, in later videos you posted, I could see the DCB on the back. My Jupiter 8 was made January 1984 and the Cetronics DB-9 DCB port sits in a higher location than when it was and edge connector style plug close to the bottom.
The SuperSaw is one of the most annoying sounds ever so every synth without it has something going for it in that way.
I think that often the success of a record is projected onto the synthesizer, and not vice versa. Roland is known for releasing underrated and commercially unsuccessful devices that then spawned whole new genres of music. I bet if someone makes a platinum album using the JD-Xi, this synth will become the next classic (well, it's already a legend, but among amateurs at the moment).
Great vid, always love a bit of J8 action. Andy Richards was fresh from producing Windows by White Door, one of the lost classic 80s synthpop albums, which has achieved somewhat cult status.
Cheers!
Really like your JP8 sounds! You should make a JP8 patch bank for Roland Cloud as you did with Juno 106!
Thanks! They know where they can find me. ;-)
@@EspenKraft Heck sell us some encore midi dumps for the real thing, Id def buy them :)
I only sell samples off the Jupiter-8 at this point. ;-)
I agree about the look, I will get a Jupiter X instead ;-)
The intro is such a spellbinder! 👏 Pertaining to it, I could never tell where one can draw the lines that differentiate a good synth, apt sound design, skillful performance and the right combination of notes.
Cheers!
It’s is an object of art that will likely never be produced in its current form again. Like any desirable and rare good the value of these will skyrocket over time.
The first arpeggiated sequence starting at 2:50 reminds me of Merry Christmas Mr Lawrence. Very nice
Cheers!
Overrated because of the price......well.... not much to say about this statement, but ...... quality can´t be measured by price.
Since the captain of the SS Roland is asleep at the wheel while Korg, Sequential and Oberheim make their old gear new again, and have decent sales numbers, I’m really looking forward to seeing some reviews of Black Corporation’s Ee-seh-nin to see if it is equal to the Deckard’s Dream in satisfying gear nostalgia GAS. Getting Jupiter 8 sound in the studio that comes with warranty and new fully tested components is a lot more appealing than buying a decades old thing hanging on by dubious threads.
My older brother has his, I used it a lot. His best friend was a famous musician and gave them all to him just because my brother liked music. His best friend is a wealthy realtor today and my brother a lawyer. He has those synths for nostalgia but he has no clue about midi. I am more a 90s person.
I used to use the Jupiter 8 with my high school band, I had a Roland JV 80 and the JP8 was good because you can hear it clearly in the mix, while the JV-80 was that fake digital thing in the back, but I managed to make it worth a lot once you mess up with the patches.
Does the Jupiter 8 is worth it? nah, not at all. If you have it good. But I would not pay more than $4K for it ever! on eBay there is one for $36,000!!!! for get it!!! never in a million years!!!!! You can have a massive studio with a third of that amount instead of wasting it on something that will be giving your problems every year and t won't resolve any problem either.
It seems to me at least that Roland have no interest in listening to customers (musicians) anymore and responding to our asks. Clearly the demand for a new JP8 is there but needs to be true analogue - not a digital emulation. That's what we want, but Roland aren't interested sadly. I suspect my last Roland purchase was my V synth in 2004.......
On my planet, digital technology is more popular than analogue and that's why multinational companies with shareholders and thousands of employees tend to invest in the present and the future rather than the past. Jupiters are becoming museum pieces, like Hendrix's guitars and Ferrari Testarossas; bought by collectors, not real people.
🙂😷😷
Got to be honest if I had the money I’d have one no question about it. Regardless of the cost. It’s a piece of synth history and it’s value will only increase.
and in the end of video, running up that hill- Kate Bush
Congrats! You're the first to mention that. ;-) It means you watched until the end. Thanks!
@@EspenKraft you'r welcome
No, he's not worth that much money.
This is only because the rich people are unfortunately able to set the prices.
This is not intended for normal people. In the early 90's this synth cost around €250.
But that doesn't matter. There are now enough good softsynths.
such immature takes. It cost $5300 when it was released. People are willfully ignorant that fine musical instruments used to cost serious paper. If you have/had something to say, rest assured you found a way to say it.
Jupiter 8, ARP Quadra, very similar, don't play mine as much anymore but will never part with them, either.
I’d love to know your thoughts on the Jupiter-X and Juno-X. I know you are a retro guy and I totally respect that, but I wonder if those two new synths are retro enough…
I did check out the Jupiter-X when it came and it was on its way, sort of, but I've completely lost interest in it and the Juno-X does not interest me enough. I have no nostalgia attached to them, or any emotional ties to new synths, and as such I don't desire them. They can of course be used to make great music, but I want to use old stuff to make MY music. ;-)
@@EspenKraft Fair. Thanks Espen!
I owned a JP8 86-93 when it was my workhorse. Huge love to it, but times are definitely better. If I still owned it I would likely not use it in music production anymore. To big, heavy, lack of connectivity etc.
Hi Espen, didn´t you have a video comparing the Jupiter 8 with a JX3p?... well I can´t find it, it was great.
It's gone.
@@EspenKraft why? It was so good
I wasn't happy with it.
Great synth and very powerful. is it worth the price?.... well... its like classic cars in a way. Pay lots of money, take it for a spin and then return to your normal setup
The Roland Jupiter 8 is more a piece of art than a musical instrument. Hence the price trend.
True. Would be interesting to know the sales figures for TR808 reproductions from Behringer. Even though the sound is almost entirely the same some people want an original one in their setup to pose with. Status symbol mentality.
I gambled with a deposit on the Black Corporation ISE-NIN J8 homage - still expensive but less expensive than a MKS-80 these days... or a serviced Juno 60.
Personally I don’t like the Jupiter 8 or the flowing Juno series.
They have a certain sound in the filter (I think) that I feel hollow (exiting lower frequencies).
Jupiter 4 is something else and feels more to my liking.
That’s me.
Think about a Jupiter 4 with all the whistles and bells of the 8 or 6? 😉
Jupiter 8 overpriced? Sure!
It looks fabulous to my eyes.
But then again, if there are buyers out there still willing to but out these kind of money asked now? …. Well.😂
One of the best polysynths ever.
It's easy to forget that just allowing for inflation alone that it cost the equivalent of £17-18,000 in today's money and that's not allowing for it being a low supply, antique collectible
Go by wages and it's 40k plus
Lol Inflation doesn't apply to synths
Is it worth it? Yes. How many people pay 50k for a car? Many. Why wouldn't be an instrument be worth 20k? Have you seen the prices for classic electric guitars from the 1950ies?
If you can't hear the difference between the resonance behaviour of the series pair of 2 pole state variable filters in the MKS80 and the 4 pole cascaded OTA filter in the JP8, virtually any polysynth with 4 pole analogue filters will give you the "Jupiter 8 sound".
The MKS80 is a Jupiter 6 with 2 extra voices and the filters stuck in low pass mode.
I've spent so much time with both the Jup-8 and the MKS-80 (rev.5) that I know I can get much of the same sound between them. There are differences of course, that sets them apart in some areas.
"much of the same sound" is a matter of opinion. I've had a Jupiter 8 for 20+ years, owned a Jupiter 6 for a couple of years, and currently own an MKS80.
Most of the fundamental character of an analogue synth comes from the filters. That's why a Jupiter 6 and a Memorymoog sound so different, even though they have exactly the same oscillators.
My MKS-80 is modified to switch between all of the Jupiter 6 and Jupiter 8 filter modes, and they clearly sound different. Even if you leave all patch settings exactly the same, the switch between filter modes with resonance any more than a third to halfway up is totally obvious.
Sure, I don't disagree with any of that really. My main concern are what I need to do to get the job done and having fun while doing it. I've been making patches for a living for over 30 years and I have my workflow and beliefs, and I'm more than willing to share them on my channel. If people agree or not is up to them. ;-)
legend
The MKS-80 is NOT a Jupiter 8. It's DNA is more like the Jupiter 6.
Overrated and stupidly expensive. I used one many years ago and thought it was bland compared to the Jupiter 4, and even my JX-3P can get close on many sounds, for a tiny fraction of the price.
Way overrated machine. I sold mine after conducting a thorough comparison to my Nord lead 2 rack. The Nord runs circles around the JP8. And I am $10k richer.
Nice final show off; I found the Relax breakdown interesting.
Cheers!
Have you seen the full video? It's on the channel Produce Like a Pro.
Overpriced, in much the same way there are CS80s on Reverb asking £50k to £60k. I guess the market sets the price and there are a lot of boomers out there with spare pension cash to throw around.
I sold my 1982 Jupiter 8 recently for twice what I paid for it, and I was happy with that.
Call me weird, but I even like Junos better, Jupiter-6 too, certainly Prophets and Oberheims.
Brilliant, glad you didn't sit on the fence!
Cheers!
Isn't it also a great electric heater for the norwegian winter? There are not many heaters which work for 40 Years!
I have gear here that works a lot better for that. The Memorymoog is one, and let's not talk about preamps. ;-)
@@EspenKraft 🙂 In the 80s with Racks full of synths and FX i never had a heater on in the winter time.😉
@@lab-by-the-sea Wow, another disadvantege of using the VSTs, lol.
@@Acrimonious_Snake Yes, only special old vst and computer-combinations could heat the room without breaking down.🙃
@@lab-by-the-sea Sure. That is why people often say that VSTs are not warm anough :)
You’re 100% correct that the Jupiter-8 is not worth the current going rate. I bought brand new a Moog One 16 voice, Prophet 10 Rev 4, Sequential Pro 3, pre-ordered the new OB-X8 and have the Roland Ultimate cloud annual subscription for less than the going rate of a decent used Jupiter-8. I felt it’s time to move on to modern hardware and software, but I’ll always prefer the real deal, it’s in your blood.
The 2 best Synths were The Roland Jupiter 8, D50 and the Yamaha DX7 80s covered.
Yet the DX7 just costs a few hundred.......for well-known reasons.
I guess it’s very similar to classic cars and other classic older items. It’s worth what someone will pay for it.
You can buy a cheap Kia and get to the store 10 miles away just fine. You can buy a classic muscle car and get there in same time for an extra $30,000.
You like the classic iconic look, feel, and sound? Then, it’s worth it….just like the car.
Are the prices a bit crazy? Yes, because we cannot afford one. There will always be certain items that are classics and thus become very expensive to own.
Exactly. I use this analogy a lot. The ride is more exciting than the end result. How much that ride should cost is up to each person. In this case it's definitely not worth it to me, but to the next guy it might. ;-)
Jupiter-80 64key version that's all I'm saying
It's amazing, there is no doubt. It's legacy is a giant among mountains. Is it worth the prices you see? Maybe not, but if I owned one, I would have to be down and out to sell it for less than a fortune.
When black corporation releases the ISE NIN my Jupiter itch will be gone
Farewell Jupiter 8 You will be missed :)
I’m very fortunate to own all three Jupiters (8, 6 and 4) and for me it is as much about them conjuring up the nostalgia and memories of years gone by (I used to own a studio in the 80s). This in itself is very inspirational when writing music. They’re amazing synths and I can’t imagine selling them (unless I need the money)!
It took me a long time to understand why my dad's workstations never could produce the great sounds of the analogue synthesizers. Here I was playing the latest keyboard on the market, yet the sounds didn't come close to the likes of the 80s classic analogue synths. I just assumed that because they were newer and technology moves on, then that must mean they would be better than the old ones.
I was wrong.
I'm in the same boat my friend . I bought my JP8 for 7.5 k , JP6 for 2.2 k and my JP 4 for 2.2. all around 6 years ago. They're all serviced and laying flat in Flight cases under my bed ! I occasionally bring them out . I feel like I've made a great investment and I know they'll keep going up and up for sure
@@lickopotamusslurperton1944 The newer workstations might not have come close, but they are great synths in their own right.
Go back to, say, 1984/85, as digital was taking over, and everyone wanted the Yamaha DX7. Now, put a workstation in your hands back then, it would have blown you away, as well as anyone working in the music industry. If I had owned a Korg Workstation, or M1, or Trinity, back in '85, it would have blown away anyone listening to it, and every artist would be queueing up to play it, and own it.
Obviously, today, we now know the Jupiter 8, and OB-8, etc.. are classics analogue synths in their own right, which is why they are commanding such insane prices.
But, a Korg Trinity, in 1985, would have blown the world away - it did me, when I got to try one out in the very first week it was released. Nothing sounded like it on earth, at that time.