Salomon QST 98 Ski Review (2023)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 июл 2024
- Salomon QST 98 Review: the 2022/2023 QST is a best-in-class progressive All-Mountain ski, featuring lightweight construction, a spoony tip, and advanced multi-radius geometry. Despite its non-traditional design, the ski's edge grip and hard snow performance is outstanding. A very strong offering from Salomon.
From the 2022 WWSRA on-snow demo at Mammoth Mountain, California.
Andy's 2022 WWSRA ski review playlist:
ruclips.net/user/playlist?list...
Follow me at:
/ @andylewicky
www.sierradescents.com
/ andylewicky
Camera Gear:
Sony RX100M5 amzn.to/3oGUMvf (affiliate link)
GoPro Hero10 Black amzn.to/3GF5tof (affiliate link)
Rycote Micro Windjammer amzn.to/3uAEesG (affiliate link)
#wwsra 
Спорт
Demoed a pair last weekend and agree 100%. Very surprised how much I enjoyed the float and feel of the qst.
Really good review man thank you I’ve had my eye on theses. They look awesome I’m trying to find a place to demo them
Really like your review of the QST 98 and M-Pro 99, I'm advance intermediate 57 5'11" 210lbs east coast, currently have a 2019 Enforcer 100 185 that I actually love for cursing, but the weight is tearing the knees down after 6 hours out torn between QST 98 and M-Pro 99, have heard the M-Pro skis similar to the enforcer, what's your thoughts. Thanks
I am thinking the M-Pro would be the more similar ski to the Enforcer. The QST is quite light and lively--though with surprisingly excellent edge grip.
Hi Andy-
Of all the all mountain skis reviewed recently which do you feel would be the best in deep powder? Looking for a one quiver ski.
I think the honest answer is...there is no one answer. I like a more traditionally-shaped ski with less floatation in powder because that's the feel I like. I know a lot of people like more floatation (ie, width) paired with rocker because that's what they like. Of all the AM skis I tried, I'd probably pick the Rustler 9 for powder. But that's because the Rustler 10 is my powder ski. If you're trying to answer this question for yourself, I'd ask: (1) do I want more or less floatation? (2) do I want a heavier or a lighter ski? (3) do I want progressive geometry (a spoony tip) that makes skiing powder easier? That should get you close to the right ski for you.
i did talk to you about the Salomon QST 106 188... i tried them and they could go through anything but i couldn't go through it.. the skies wore me out.. i broke my arm that day but it was a fluke.. i was on the top of a mogul and i came out of the binding.. not sure when i will be able to get back on the slopes.. how does the 98 compare to the 106 and what length 98?
Sorry to hear it! I like the narrower widths because I like a ski with less floatation in powder and better carving performance overall -- so I was not comparing skis in the 106mm range. I think I was demoing around a 180 length. The skis sound similar in construction. Would expect the 98 to be quicker and more powerful on its edges.
@@AndyLewicky We will see how long I am laid up. I still do want a ski that handles crud, powder, and slush for spring skiing. For early season I can use my skis that are over 20 years old that all have a very short turning radius so that I can avoid all the people on the crowded runs. My 88s under foot seam good when more of the hill opens up but it is still mostly hard pack.
I am sure I could use all of my skis that are over 20 years old for the bumps but for the most party I have transitioned away from the bumps.
Andy, does tip/tail rocker do any favors for carving on groomers or crud? I'm used to a full camber ski (don't upgrade skis very often) and have never ridden a rocker ski. I do enjoy carving low and high speed, but would like to find myself off groomers in powder sometimes, without sinking or tail riding.
They first began introducing rocker into performance carvers a while ago, but it tended to make the skis feel "soft". Modern rocker has gotten very good, so unless you want a FIS racer, you'd probably actually prefer some tip/tail rocker, even on a directional ski. And if you want soft snow performance, rocker is king. I def encourage you to try out some of the new skis--think you'll like them. :)
The question is do I buy a 92 or 98? I’m more beginner than I am intermediate, but I learned pretty fast. I don’t like narrow and icy blues, which i experienced recently. I’m thinking a 92 will help in those conditions and still thrive in other situations, making it a true all around quiver ski. What are your thoughts? Thx in advance
I in general recommend developing skiers go narrower rather than wider. That will help you progress in your skills
@@AndyLewickyI rented a 104 atomic bent and it felt better having more control over it than a 90c mindbender. I prefer a little wider now but under 100. 104 felt too much on a groomer
Would you take the QST 98 over the Rustler 9?
I tend to favor more traditional geometry (vs the spoony-tip) so personally I would lean toward the Rustler, but these are both outstanding skis that hit different niches. Both are well worth trying!
Hey Andy - Im curently on the Rossi Blops Escaper 93. love it - you reviewed a couple years ago. If possible - how would you compare to the QST 98? thinking up getting them. thanks!
I guess my take would be currently, Salomon does this kind of ski (complex/progressive geometry) better than Rossignol does. The QST really is outstanding, if that's what you're looking for
wow thanks for the super duper fast reply!!! sounds good! Can never have enough skis in the quiver anyway! thanks again! hope your having a great season!