Do I still Love the Salomon QST 106 1 year Later? : Long Term Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 июл 2024
  • Elliott Reviews his 182 Salomon QST 106's after owning them for 1 year. Do The Salomon QST 106's Hold UP? Elliott also talks about how they compare to the Black Crows Atris and the Atomic Bent 110.
    Music: Maxzwell - Bonne Vie
    Support the Channel and Buy These skis Here:
    Salomon QST 106 2024
    www.avantlink.com/click.php?t...
    2024 Atomic Maverick 95 TI
    www.avantlink.com/click.php?t...
    0:00 Do I still Like the QST 106?
    1:45 Similar Skis
    2:25 Damage over time
    3:00 The Bindings I use
    3:30 QST 106 Vs QST Blank
    4:00 Length
    5:15 Snowboarding's Distant Cousin
    6:20 Zach's Thoughts
    7:15 Buy Last year's skis for a Deal

Комментарии • 24

  • @RicketySkiReviews
    @RicketySkiReviews  Месяц назад +6

    Thanks everyone for watching, hopefully you enjoy these long term reviews, it's a new concept I'm testing with skis that I've gotten more mileage on since my initial review.

  • @charliemcmonagle
    @charliemcmonagle 11 дней назад +1

    Just pulled the trigger on a pair of these. Selling for under 300eur here in Europe right now. Cheers Elliott

  • @bearclaw5115
    @bearclaw5115 Месяц назад

    I just picked these up in a 189cm. Haven't skied them yet but I can report that they are overweight. Salomon says the 189 is 2080g and shows it right on the ski. Mine weight 2290g. Other outlets have confirmed higher than stated weights as well. The are surprisingly stiff and feel like powerful planks. If your after a lighter alternative that would be the RMU Apostle 106 at sub 2,000g.

  • @Drwatcherman
    @Drwatcherman Месяц назад +1

    Picked up a pair of QST 98 demos for sale near the end of season after your (and Ski Essentials) raving about them (East Coast/ VT). So good! We had a couple of late powder days and they were great in bumps and trees. Also was blown away at how well they carve groomers (esp since no metal/ carbon). Thanks!!!

  • @gmanchenko
    @gmanchenko Месяц назад +1

    Elliot- thanks for the review; I bought the ski early in the season partially based on your first review and love them. Felt comfortable immediately; tons of float; super friendly to maneuver. Just need more powder.

  • @frederikvermote1960
    @frederikvermote1960 Месяц назад

    After struggling a little with my Mantra's in deep Sierra "cement" powder, your review brought the 106s to my attention and (after some more research) I bought my first designated powder ski - this year's 106 in a 173cm (a tad shorter than my 177 Mantra's but same as my Blizzard Brahma 82s). I also got the Pivot spx12 bindings but haven't been able to set it all up yet. So keen I'm actually considering going to Chili cos the season is done on this side of the planet

  • @alainbrouillaud484
    @alainbrouillaud484 Месяц назад +2

    Hi Elliott 😊 Since when can people not ski in deep powder with a 106cm ski? Good skiers should be able to manage in deep snow with any ski over 100cm… just my two cents.
    I can’t wait to go skiing next winter 😊⛷️

    • @ludwig.o
      @ludwig.o Месяц назад +1

      I mean he just said the QSt blank would make sense over the 106 in "really" deep powder, or maybe i missed something he said

  • @carterfan80
    @carterfan80 Месяц назад +1

    Agree about the spx. Great value. Enough binding for 90% + of skiers. A great option if you don't have the budget for pivot

    • @RicketySkiReviews
      @RicketySkiReviews  Месяц назад

      It's wild, it's like the perfect mix of value and quality imo

  • @GreatBearProductions
    @GreatBearProductions Месяц назад +1

    You should have a video on how to buy a powder ski. Kinda like your "what ski width should i get" video. Im in the market for some now lol

  • @darinsmith2458
    @darinsmith2458 Месяц назад +1

    I demoed the 106 in a 188 length.. This was before they changed the shape a little.. I think the turn radius was 23m... I am pretty sure that the turn radius is shorter now.. I would probably be fine with the 182 length.. I agree with everything that you have said with these skis.. With that being said I would compare them to my DPS Wailer F100 x 184.. The thing that I think is different is that the tails on my DPS are very turny and if you lean back the skis will spin.. Other than that the shape is very similar.. There is no metal... Some carbon but not in a reactive sort of way.. I really would compare these skis to water skis... I used to slalom and I even did some slalom courses.. They absorb really good and they float really good.. Great skis..

  • @andreschoonhoven9495
    @andreschoonhoven9495 Месяц назад

    hi Elliot, i bought the qst 92 after you talked about them. After skiing narrow carving skis for my first 10 years on snow, i really liked their performance on and off trail. To expand my quiver, i was looking at some even wider freeride options. I was looking at the Atris , but also considered the qst 106 or even the ranger 102. What would the best option in your opinion. Greatings from the Alps

  • @RaulTT1812
    @RaulTT1812 Месяц назад

    How about the QST echo? Have you skied those? Would be interesting to see what difference does just construction and weight make.

  • @jonschmitt232
    @jonschmitt232 Месяц назад

    Curious about the new Maverick 115 powder skis.

  • @JoelBass68
    @JoelBass68 Месяц назад

    How is it when the snow gets chopped up and tracked? Does it cut through well, or would the 98 width be better for those conditions?

  • @kangsterizer
    @kangsterizer Месяц назад

    but but qst 92 vs maverick 95? ;)

  • @carterfan80
    @carterfan80 Месяц назад +1

    You don't have to justify 2 pow skis, You're an influencer!😂

    • @RicketySkiReviews
      @RicketySkiReviews  Месяц назад +2

      haha I will try this explanation on my wife and report back

  • @charliemcmonagle
    @charliemcmonagle Месяц назад +1

    Just for reference, how tall are you Elliott?