Quick steps through the Double Diamond

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 фев 2025

Комментарии • 26

  • @籍明鑫
    @籍明鑫 8 лет назад +2

    An experienced teacher with patient and humor. This video is clear and organized. LIKE!!!

  • @CaerelsJan
    @CaerelsJan 6 лет назад +2

    Nice explanation. To-the-point & very clear. Thank you Paul

  • @purewater77887
    @purewater77887 4 года назад +1

    The best I've seen so far. Thanks

  • @amirathana4455
    @amirathana4455 2 года назад +1

    nice explanation , simple and clear thanks you

  • @MrSibate
    @MrSibate 4 года назад +1

    Great video Paul, thank you for sharing!

  • @gerroverkerk
    @gerroverkerk 3 года назад +1

    Great, Paul! Very clear!

  • @kylehamm7287
    @kylehamm7287 8 лет назад +3

    very nice, simplistic way of teaching this method. thanks.

    • @paulhartogobsolete4787
      @paulhartogobsolete4787  8 лет назад

      You are very welcome! I'm aware that it can be improved but this 'quick and dirty' thingy might do the job eh?

  • @OpaPaulHartog
    @OpaPaulHartog 2 года назад +1

    Dear viewer, At the time of production I was very focused on keeping this vid short and simple. Now I realise that I should have mentioned that iterations (jumping back before jumping forth again) will most probably be needed and welcomed!

  • @sergioarielgodoy8388
    @sergioarielgodoy8388 6 лет назад

    Great explanation about the double diamond Paul. It is a quite new model for me. Thank you! Im interesting in learning more about it.

    • @paulhartogobsolete4787
      @paulhartogobsolete4787  6 лет назад

      Spread the word! It's my absolute fave and I kinda like that this is NOT a Stanford thingy :)

  • @erronwhite8771
    @erronwhite8771 11 месяцев назад

    Straight to the point

  • @RockyBalboa2024-w9r
    @RockyBalboa2024-w9r 5 лет назад +1

    Excellent!

  • @emrahy.849
    @emrahy.849 Год назад

    thnx a lot🎯

  • @abdulkarimkazzaz3404
    @abdulkarimkazzaz3404 6 лет назад +1

    Great explanation.
    Thank you.

  • @sharonvos6031
    @sharonvos6031 6 лет назад +1

    Great video Paul! You make it very clear. It would be great to use this in my class on service design theory, if that's ok!

    • @paulhartogobsolete4787
      @paulhartogobsolete4787  6 лет назад +1

      Thanks! You are very welcome! Note: the model is not my intellectual property. I like that it's easy to recognise when to divert and convert, I ♥ the alliterations and I also 'secretly' enjoy that this is a step out of the 'Stanford doctrine'.

  • @buskinglankans
    @buskinglankans 5 лет назад

    Why not so much about quality ? we need to think about of quality right ? Which phase are we doing the feasibility study ?

    • @paulhartogobsolete4787
      @paulhartogobsolete4787  5 лет назад +1

      Quality is typically in the divergent parts. That is where 'chaff and wheat' are divided.

    • @paulhartogobsolete4787
      @paulhartogobsolete4787  5 лет назад

      The feasibility study is typically the Deliver-phase. You 'do' or 'act' your new service (process) and find out how good it is.

    • @buskinglankans
      @buskinglankans 5 лет назад

      @@paulhartogobsolete4787 thanks for explaining

    • @paulhartogobsolete4787
      @paulhartogobsolete4787  5 лет назад

      @@buskinglankans You are most welcome!

  • @paulhartogobsolete4787
    @paulhartogobsolete4787  5 лет назад +1

    www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/what-framework-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond?fbclid=IwAR2Beo5RnfnxkxenKEr372Tyd5MG0WjEWUPVDPmkL53xHXEv45jIpx1Ao3g

  • @paulhartogobsolete4787
    @paulhartogobsolete4787  6 лет назад +1

    facebook.com/groups/M5.2012/