Will would love to win but I couldn't even afford to buy the glass for it. I bought the cannon rebel series t6 for my wife because she wants to start this new endeavor but we soon found out how expensive this long life dream of hers can get and that's as far as it goes. But at least we are trying. That said we love your content and she has learned a lot in the short time she has had the t6. Keep them coming cause she looks forward to your videos.
I have the old version of both these lenses at work, and they’re awesome. I gotta say though, the Sigma is really impressive. Sigma lenses have gotten so good!
After watching Id say both lenses did great and Im impressed with what 3rd party lenses have been doing as of late.. focus speed & accuracy... sharpness and color are on point.. Spending less on such lenses no longer means sacrificing quality.. I feel pros could feel confident using these lenses.
I think 15-20 years ago there was a bit of a stigma about buying third party lenses and using them on pro body cameras (people would say there's no point, or it's a waste of money). But now Sigma has come on a long way... the 24-105 art lens is fantastic, and Sigma lenses are a great alternative.
This is so amazing. Today I read a comment from a guy on the Sigma 60 600 video: "Looking forward to see a real world review of the Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 Sports " Now you upload this. Excited to watch this.
Something to remember: Simga lenses, in my extensive ownership, have difficulties focusing consistently on Canon DSLRs. They've been flawless on the EOS R. Sigma and Tamron have greatly improved in build quality and optical quality over the past 5-8 years. Sigmas original 85mm f/1.4 and 70-200 f/2.8 OS lenses were the start of something big for them. Finally, the build quality and design have gotten to top levels.
Just got the Sigma last week and thrilled I saved the money. Got to use it on my t3i and had some focus issues in low light, but that’s the 9 focus points on the t3i. We will see how it does with my 90D once I get it (on preorder). As a higher level amateur the sigma really fit the bill!
You're so honest man! WOW! I truly appreciate you, the way you explained which one is the best for someone just starting out. Good luck in everything man.
14:20 I actually prefer the look as it is, you can see the hopes and dreams in the audience if you so choose to, and if it was a decisive moment in the game it would have been a really good thing to include. It's not distracting, there's a clear separation, but if you completely blow out the audience, what's the purpose of the game? The audience is an important part of team sports and a good component to include to contribute to the atmosphere of the photo.
I love Jared’s content! Always quick to the point and he explains everything with perfection. Solid content! I give this a 10 out 10. His podcast are dope too! A real person, doing real quality content! My go too!
This lens is the latest I have in my bag from Sigma having already purchased a number of Art Series lenses as well as the 100-400mm Contemporary. I tested it this past weekend at a Cycling event here in Perth, Australia with amazing results. Even with head on downhill speeds approaching 60 kmh and filling the frame, this lens didn't miss. It is an outstanding piece of equipment.
I think the best test for comparison would be to shoot these lenses outdoors because I believe the version III canon 70-200 has updated lens coating and I wonder how it holds up against sun flares/haze over the Sigma. I think anyone looking to buy these lenses are mostly going to be wedding photographers that sometimes shoot outdoor weddings
I used it indoors in a tough lighting situation. You can not assume that mostly wedding photographers will be buying this lens. This is a staple or should be a staple of every full frame photographers bag. 24-70 and 70-200. Following down the road would be other specialty lenses.
@@Darthbishop no way: 70-200/2.8 II is really the same as the III version, just 1 coating missing. not worth upgrading to the mkIII and since this Sigma sport and Tamron G2 looks very similar for picture quality - why would you upgrade? (I have the mkII and won't spend money changing it :D )
Tremendous real world comparison, as usual, Jared. You're the best out there at testing, comparing and reviewing cameras and lenses. Even someone like Michael the Maven, who puts in a tremendous effort with his comparisons, doesn't do truly real world reviews. He shoots "set up" scenarios. A girl jogging on a field is nothing like a bunch of overlapping people moving erratically and competing for a ball (and competing for the camera's AF attention at the same time). I love the way you demonstrate that almost any camera can get the job done, while other reviewers try to convince us we need the latest and greatest camera to capture a good shot, which is utter nonsense. Your efforts are truly appreciated.
@Jared Polin .. i gotta say i really love your Reviews as there is no BS nor bias towards one Lens or the other just good honest feedback on how they perform in real world situations ..
The review I have been waiting for. You made the choice pretty easy! I'll be picking up the Sigma soon and cannot wait to get it. Keep up the great work and thank you!
I'm so glad you found the sigma to be solid. I've been looking forward to this lens for a long time. Now I just need to pull the trigger on a body upgrade. lmao.
Korey Bartos check Facebook marketplace religiously. I just got my new 1Dx mk ii for a great price. There’s always some nice bodies from people who are updating, or switching brands
Luke Zacharias photography and videography. Plus it was my favorite of canon’s line up. Basically I got it because I liked it lol. Definitely wouldn’t recommend it for stuff like portraits, etc, even though it holds up beautifully. At the end of the day it’s still a specialty camera for sports and wildlife.
Really care about the glass quality, and better, long-lasting usage ? Put the bucks in and go for Canon. Canon glasses are the best in market, no doubt about that.
I bought the Sigma today, I am definitely a beginner level and have two cropped cameras, my original Rebel t7i which I loved to learn on, and now my Canon 90d. This is the one I will be using with the lens. I have being doing some wildlife and outdoor desert shooting so I bit the bullet and added the 70-200mm 2.8 to my bag. Like you the store guy who has the Canon couldn’t justify the extra $600 for my level and needs. Thank you the video did calm me down after dropping a lot of money!!
I bought the Sigma 70-200 in early January I doubted myself for not buying the Canon 70-200. I couldn’t find very many if any video or written reviews on it. Just a bunch of content hyping it up. This video made me feel 10000x better about the purchase.
Yap Vi Seng I ended up purchasing the canon from a guy how used it 3 months for $1400 😬😬😬. With the written warranty from B&H. A year after, the Canon is a superb lens 😍😍😍 one of my favorites. Always search ebay for a good deal.
@@isaija7943 it's been mostly great! It's super sharp, sharper than anything I've ever used before. Image stabilization paired with my Lumix IBIS makes filming at 200mm no problem at all, very stable footage. The colors are good, but not very saturated. My cheaper lenses give me much more contrast when filming. It's not a bad thing but something to consider. The focus is fast and accurate, the zoom ring feels kind of stiff but is becoming smoother as time goes on. The custom buttons can be very handy too. It's heavy and kinda big (my 150-600 feels lighter) and with the adapter I'm using, the length feels like a 400mm 5.6. The images I get from it are so good though, that I don't really care about the weight. Although I did recently purchase a 100mm 2.8 as a lighter short telephoto option, to make my backpack a bit lighter and to attract less attention when I take my camera out on the street. I would still 100% recommend this lens. Best one I've bought so far.
Awesome review Jared! They both look really good. As a Canon shooter I personally would get a Canon 70-200 II used. Besides that we all should consider Sigma and Tamron.
One critical point I’d love to see covered - how well the Warranty’s are covered and how quickly repairs are made.. Canon’s CPS Service is fantastic and often “on site” at major events. CPS is one major reason for some of the price differences in these products, and why you see so many real Pro’s are sticking with Canon. Coupled with their “loaner program”, their Pro Service means money in the bank.
On one of your videos you were able to review the contemporary lens for Sigma then that's when I decided to go for it. Some of us have photography as hobby and not able to afford expensive lenses. A year I got the Sigma contemporary lens 150-600mm ; then few days ago I purchased a used Canon 70-200 2.8 USM without IS. Thank you for taking the time to review both lenses.
Perfectly timed video Fro! I'm looking at upgrading to a f/2.8 lens for my Canon EOS-R to shoot high school lacrosse. I'm not entirely sure the 70-200 gives me enough reach (currently use Canon 100-400) but it might be my best option since games are in the evenings, under the lights and I really need a f/2.8 lens. Not sure there's another lens out there (under $2,000) that's going to match up. Any suggestions??? Thanks for all the great content!
Honestly like you said, these are two greats lenses. It depends on the personal choice of the buyer. Like me, my equipment is Canon since always. Thank you Jarod for all your tecnical informations, I never miss one! Have a nice day! Guy
Great review Jared. I'm currently in the market for the canon 70-200 but I plan to buy a used lens. There is a lot of pretty good deals out there for around $1100 bucks. Keep up the great reviews!
I currently own the Sigma Sport and I absolutely love it!. I find it hard to believe that the Canon lens can produce better/sharper images. I think I might loan the Canon lens and try my own real life review
I made my decision for a few weeks for the Canon in via Amazon and the Canon winter sale and get for 1870 € compared to price of 2300€ in the Canon online store. And it’s a great lens! I really enjoy the photos made with this lens.
Came back to this Video since I see a Sigma 70-200 close with good price... forget the glass.. I appreciate you being human and missing focus on the eye a few times and comming clean and saying.. it's not the lens.. that is why we follow you. Thank you Jared. keep it up!
Ok Jared. At 17:40, when I look through the viewfinder that single point focus marker isn’t differentiating between the eye and eyelash. I’m not sure I agree with that point. I wouldn’t see how you you could say YOU missed that focus by that little. I’d say the canon prolly hit a little better there.
I had the original 70-200 from sigma, always had trouble to get consistent focus on my 7D. I once rented the canon 70-200, non IS, mark I. consistent focus, sharpness even at 2.8. I kept my beloved sigma for 16 years (because heh, even if many shots were missed even if the af points were ok, i wont lie : i could manage to get nice pictures on a full event), but i moved to the canon mkIII version.
I was waiting for this video, since Nikon version just being released, would be great to see a real world review with that one against the nikon 70-200 versions VR versions. Anyone else agree?
One little thing you didn’t touch on but I think makes a difference... all of these cameras *nailed* the skin tone on these players. Yes darker skin is tougher to shoot but I’m willing to bet you didn’t do any EV adjustments. Both lenses and cameras handled it very well. All of your other points are solid and it does matter that you can flat out shoot. In the hands of a newbie they may see the difference with the weight and handling of the Sigma vs. the Canon. Plus the psychological effect of spending $2k on a lens makes it seem to perform better overall. Your review cut right though that. Great vid!
Just got my Sigma today, image quality is superb but I can’t stand how the tri pod collar can’t be taken all the way off. It would also be really helpful to have the zoom ring up front where the focus ring is instead
@@thewritinglefty4889 Leica, Sigma and Panasonic are all L mount lenses, meaning they are interchangeable. Therefore you do not need an adapter. That's one heck of an alliance! Big savings there if you have more than one L-Mount brand.
Jared & FroKnows Team, thanks for this comparison video. I pleased to hear that the big third party names are improving their offerings. Although the Sigma is heavier and has a larger filter thread size, Sigma gives 3-year warranty compared to 1-yr for Canon. QUESTION: Jared, are the buttons on the Sigma programable to toggle between AF Single and AF Servo or initiate the viewfinder level? Thanks in advance.
@@bamit1979 rumor is that the 70-200 and 100-400 for native e mount were going to be released after the 24-70 which was just released last month. no point adapting it for a video if it's going to have a native variant released shortly
I don't get it! Why no steady studio or outside tripod shots to establish which renders best? How can a subjective view of their resolving performance be established at ISO 3200 and moving subjects in a dimly lit gymnasium? Speed of AF and ease of use ok but what about resolving power?
I just bought the new Sigma to replace my old SIGMA which weighs in at 2lbs. 9oz. This new lens is a TANK! I don’t think I’ll keep it. It’s very unwieldy for the fast moving action of ice hockey. Now conflicted between this Canon lens or the RF Canon 70-200 as I’ve purchased and waiting for a CANON EOS R6 to arrive...Two concerns...price of the RF version ($2,700!) and the extending lens when zooming. It’s great to have in the bag to make it easier to carry, but often I have to take photos from behind the glass at games and use a rubber hood to press against the glass. If my lens is extending and retracting all the time, I’ll have to wear rollerblades to keep moving since I don’t want to push through the glass! So, I think I may have answered my own question..get the EF lens with the adapter and have fun.
Jared - Awesome video, as usual. I have an EOS R with the EF adapter. I'm looking at getting the Sigma 70-200 with the 2x extender. Any concerns for image quality with all this on the camera at once?
The lenses from the EF mount should work natively on the RF mount when using a native EF to RF adapter. What will you use this combination for, especially with the extender? I would never recommend a 2x extender. If you need the also reach, get another lens, use a 1.4x or crop a bit. If it’s for sports, you might be better with a Sigma 120-300mm S or Canon 300mm f/2.8L. If it’s for wildlife photography, I wouldn’t get anything less than 400mm. 70-200mm + 2x extender is not a good choice for wildlife photography. It would be better just going for the 100-400mm II or Canon 400mm f/5.6L.
Always respect your lack of bias when looking at gear Jared. Good review. Both pretty incredible lenses, the Sigma is astounding for the price. I have a Canon 6D Mark ii and think it is pretty remarkable for the price
Hey Jared. Thanks for the enthusiastic video on this lens.. I shoot with the Crop lens of a 70D and have this lens. It's my first go-to lens since I purchased the Camera 4 years ago. Great lens!
Thanks man for the very detailed but non-boring analysis. I'm a big fan of Sigma on EOS but you're right, the focus on moving subjects is not easy. Sometimes I focus manually.
Jared, I need you to know something. Please? I recently bought my M50. I'm the kind of dude that investigates, that does the due diligence, the puts in the time for the crime, baby! Reviewing hundreds of RUclips's on photography ....You are not like ANY of the other's. At all. If there was an Oscar to be given for performance, for truly embracing 'what the worlds most perfect vlogger' would be like. You would win. FROM: your overall production of the video's themselves, to the brand, to the explanations, with perfect speed, rhyme & tempo & pause, on delivery, knowledge & thought, to name just a few things! You're IT! Thank you for putting in your one of a kind passion into these video's. I blame you for my newly found passion, addiction. You're kinda like photo-knowledge porn. ..............
Fantastic video, Jared! You were thorough and fair. And everyone knows that as Tony and Chelsea always say, “Canon glass is awesome!” Yet you make a great case for the Sigma and for a non-professional, that might be the way to go. Also loved the way you put the EOS R to work in Temple’s gym. Great photos!
I think the main issue with Sigma has been that they haven't had the necessary access to get a similar level of integration. I personally haven't had issues with 3rd party lenses.
Jared love your videos. I seeking a 70-200 for my Nikon, I Can not Chose betweetster the Tamron one or the Sigma one. In one video (baseball) you testen the tamron one and in a video (basketball) you tested the sigma. You never tested this thirdparty lensjes in one test. I’m looping for a good pinnsharp lens (thirdparty). Can you help me chose? Regards Daniel (Netherlands) and I shoot RAW ;)
This is probably a dumb question but I currently have a canon 5D mark 3, I would love to upgrade to a mirrorless canon or Sony in the future (late 2024). until then I have to buy a 70-200 mm lens and these are the two I am debating between. If I get this lens for my current canon will it work on the Sony Mirrorless camera if I choose to go with Sony instead on canon? Thank you for your help.
I own the 70-200 mm sigma 2.8 Non IS and although it's an oldy, it still stands its ground!! Great lens made by a great manufacture! I still don't understand why ppl would spend the colosal $$ on a red circle!
Hey Jared i just wondering would you put the sigma 70-200 with the MC-11 on a sony a7iii? do you have pros and cons. as the sony 70-200 f2.8 is crazy money here in Ireland
I've been shooting with the sigma 70-200 sports on my A7Rii with the MC-11 for about a month, and for the most part it feels native. In low (REALLY low) light it can hut a tad, but I had the same problem with the 70-200 2.8 G Master. It would perform amazingly on the A7III, and even on my A7Rii, eye Eye AF works great. The video AF works in continuous, but on my camera it always micro-adjusts the focus, all the time. You can't tell in the finished video, but it is audible through the mic. Let me know if you have any other questions, as I don't really think Jared will revisit this lens.
Thanks Jared, I found this very helpful. I bought the Sigma and use it on the EOS RP. It works fine and the images are as super sharp as you say, the bokeh is nice and the weight is actually ok. I found the autofocus to be sluggish though and I'm still contemplating, if I can live with that, but probably will, because the image quality is so fantastic and the price is right.
@@damjanstijovic1208 Yes, that was my impression. I traded it for the Tamron a week later and found it worked better with the autofocus. But that's just me.
This is an older video, so not sure if I will get a reply BUTT............ )) I have a Sony A7R4 and no where near the budget to get the Sony 70-200 lens. I have been waiting 10000 years for Sigma to bring out their 70 - 200 but there is no sign of it being released any time soon. (Unless you listen to Sony Rumors, who rumor it will be out this coming last decade ago) I'd love to take some quality Sports (Biking/Skiing etc) and Landscape photography but I don't know which cheaper glass to invest in? You have a video reviewing the 70-180 Tamron, but I'm not sure how that would cope in a sports environment (plus missing out on 20mm feels like it could be annoying) ((That's what she said)) Maybe I could buy the Cannon 70 - 200 F4 with an adapter, but that's still pricey and I might need that better 2.8 aperture in wood/shaded environments. OR The Sigma 70 - 200 2.8 with the Canon to Sony Adapter? Would the auto focus be fast enough? Do you have any future plans to help us mere miniscule money mortals? I would love a real world review so I could see what the best alternative options are.
As usual, fantastic review. You give all keys to do the best choice, thanks. 600$ cheaper but 300g heavier than the canon III that’s the question. We have to consider also the old canon version II which is very good too.
Also keep in mind that these are high end lenses, you're not likely to be replacing them unless they're destroyed, stolen or you switch systems. Over the course of a career, or even just hobby, the cost of a lens of this price isn't that much. Back in the days of film when you had to be paying per shot, you could easily hit this kind of cost in a couple years if you were doing a lot. Developing, even at home, isn't the cheapest thing in the world.
Jared, you should do a comparison between 70-200 2.8 Tamron G2, Sigma Sports, or Nikon VR2. G2, Sports and used VR2 are all very similar in price, once the Sigma for Nikon is released
Thanks Fro. I went to two different stores today and just about put down my money to take the Canon home but thought I would watch a few more videos and came across this one. $600 is a big difference. I only want to buy it once. Ultimately, I think we justify what we want anyway but I do like other Sigma products that I have or have had. At the end of the day, using it with my SkyGuideer Pro, the lighter weight does make a difference and I will probably get back in my car and go by the Canon anyway. Seems like the sharpness, clarity, and noise were better with the Canon.
Better is relative at this point! Now this might not matter to you if you upgrade your gear every year but the one thing with 3rd party lenses is reliability. How will the lens perform 6 months later after purchase How often do i have to calibrate that's really where the main difference is. Reliability and longevity
First off great video! What are your thoughts on buying a lens for a newer photographer when trying to decide between the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM vs. Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 sport. My wife plans to use it primarily for video footage of our son playing lacrosse, but plans to use it for photos as well. The price point difference between the two appears to be around $600 to $800. Based on my research the sport has weather sealing and 11 aperture blades vs 9 blades on the EX, along with some other minor differences (lens length and diameter). Wondering if it makes sense to spend the extra money on the sport version as it would be primarily for sports. We plan on pairing it with a Canon EOS R10. Thanks for your input in advance!
I've also heard it works well with the MC-11, but would like to see a review like this that puts it to the test in a real world sport shooting condition, on either the A9 or A7III.
16:50 I actually like the sigma it's Boka looks nicer with a smooth roll-off were as the canon has a weird cut out looking thing around the woman in the background it looks awful and the woman in the foreground looks way more cut out and the border doesn't look pleasing at all
It seems the biggest complaints from those that have purchased and reviewed their Sigma lenses through Amazon, Adorama, B&H is the inconsistency of quality control. Some copies are better than others. I'd like to see some lab testing with different focus charts, particularly with Sigma, for resolution, aberration and vignetting. For the budget minded this would be a good start, or Tamron.
how you're doing i just got my canon 80d and i want a good zoom lens like the sigma 70-200 and it's all black and i see it takes great pictures. i want a few lens but i don't want to kill my pockets you understand. but i'm in love with sigma products and plus it's cheaper than canon. i guess those photographers can buy them cause they get paid i do this for fun and i want to be good at what i do ya see.i want to get this 70-200 f2.8 over the canon 55-250 so i want your opinion i'm going to buy the 18-35 sigma lens the 35mm 1.4 sigma lens and the 70-200 that's a good combination right? i was thinking 24-105 and the 24mm pancake lens and my collection is complete
Sigma has a strange fascination with making their gear HEAVY. Even here they give their lens a bigger front element than everyone else - likely to improve corner sharpness and vignetting. Personally I'd prefer not to break my back carrying it around, but that's going to be a highly subjective thing. Good to have the option I guess.
With modern cameras, you can usually fix the vignetting during raw conversion. Having that larger lens does cause issues that are more of a pain than running a filter to fix the vignetting.
Good lens. I'd probably still pick the Canon out of the two because it's a warranty it's gonna do well, on the Nikon side however seeing the price I'd pick the Sigma
Nice review, I have the Cannon 2.8 70-200 II and it's the best and worst lens I have. The best: because you can use it everywhere. The worst: It's so heavy. But all in all - I can't live without it.
Hey man, congrats on your work! From this day I will follow your videos. I think you explain yourself so clear and your tests and knowledge are so helpful. I think I'll go with the Sigma, I'm used to carry weight in my photography journeys in the mountains. ;)
How does this new Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 DG OS HSM | S compare to the ~10 year old Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM? Are the results comparatively that it's worth it to save more for the newer one?
OK Canon 70-200 Version 2 or Sigma Art Sport.. they are both the exact same price right now if I was to buy one today. Which one is better? All around better lens?
Do you want to WIN a camera? I'm giving away one right here WIN A CAMERA Mega FRO Giveaway froknowsphoto.com/megafro/
@Jared can you test it with the MC-11 to see how it performs on the new Sony bodys? THANKS!!!
Really want a full frame camera.
Yes please!
Very nice of you Jared! Gratz for reaching 1mill subs, you deserve it! :)
Will would love to win but I couldn't even afford to buy the glass for it. I bought the cannon rebel series t6 for my wife because she wants to start this new endeavor but we soon found out how expensive this long life dream of hers can get and that's as far as it goes. But at least we are trying. That said we love your content and she has learned a lot in the short time she has had the t6. Keep them coming cause she looks forward to your videos.
The haters gonna hate, but these real world reviews are exactly why I watch your show. Keep it up, big homie!
I just got the Sigma and it's totally awesome. The lens is super sharp and the optical stabilisation is the best I've used!
I am planning to buy sigma 70-200mm lence hope it’s better buy
I have the old version of both these lenses at work, and they’re awesome. I gotta say though, the Sigma is really impressive. Sigma lenses have gotten so good!
After watching Id say both lenses did great and Im impressed with what 3rd party lenses have been doing as of late.. focus speed & accuracy... sharpness and color are on point.. Spending less on such lenses no longer means sacrificing quality.. I feel pros could feel confident using these lenses.
I think 15-20 years ago there was a bit of a stigma about buying third party lenses and using them on pro body cameras (people would say there's no point, or it's a waste of money). But now Sigma has come on a long way... the 24-105 art lens is fantastic, and Sigma lenses are a great alternative.
This is so amazing. Today I read a comment from a guy on the Sigma 60 600 video: "Looking forward to see a real world review of the Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 Sports
"
Now you upload this. Excited to watch this.
Something to remember: Simga lenses, in my extensive ownership, have difficulties focusing consistently on Canon DSLRs. They've been flawless on the EOS R.
Sigma and Tamron have greatly improved in build quality and optical quality over the past 5-8 years. Sigmas original 85mm f/1.4 and 70-200 f/2.8 OS lenses were the start of something big for them. Finally, the build quality and design have gotten to top levels.
Just got the Sigma last week and thrilled I saved the money. Got to use it on my t3i and had some focus issues in low light, but that’s the 9 focus points on the t3i. We will see how it does with my 90D once I get it (on preorder). As a higher level amateur the sigma really fit the bill!
How did it end up performing on the 90d?
@@rowen0fstrataright
The Canon lens is white, makes you look like a pro, nuff said. :)
Haha you can fake it with a white lens but at end of day is final images that count anyhow I get your point
KEN HUANG It’s a joke
Are we lens racist now? :D :D
Just spray paint the sigma
Unless you use it for video and you want to stay in the shadows. Sigma for the win. Black Lenses Matter.
Great review - I've got an EOS R and I'm trying to decide between these exact lenses. Sigma takes it
Sigma made a huge name for themselves with the sigma 18-35 1.8
Indeed
@@divil2273 Exactly
Yes! Yes! Yes!!
I just got that I love it already
Beautiful lens
You're so honest man! WOW! I truly appreciate you, the way you explained which one is the best for someone just starting out. Good luck in everything man.
Great review thanks Fro team your content is always a treat and I appreciate the work you put into your vids for people
thank you.
14:20 I actually prefer the look as it is, you can see the hopes and dreams in the audience if you so choose to, and if it was a decisive moment in the game it would have been a really good thing to include. It's not distracting, there's a clear separation, but if you completely blow out the audience, what's the purpose of the game? The audience is an important part of team sports and a good component to include to contribute to the atmosphere of the photo.
I love Jared’s content! Always quick to the point and he explains everything with perfection. Solid content! I give this a 10 out 10. His podcast are dope too! A real person, doing real quality content! My go too!
Sigma Killin it! We need more third party options!
This lens is the latest I have in my bag from Sigma having already purchased a number of Art Series lenses as well as the 100-400mm Contemporary. I tested it this past weekend at a Cycling event here in Perth, Australia with amazing results. Even with head on downhill speeds approaching 60 kmh and filling the frame, this lens didn't miss. It is an outstanding piece of equipment.
I should add, I had it on my 1DX
I have a 100 100 400 and I'm considering getting the 70 - 200
I think the best test for comparison would be to shoot these lenses outdoors because I believe the version III canon 70-200 has updated lens coating and I wonder how it holds up against sun flares/haze over the Sigma. I think anyone looking to buy these lenses are mostly going to be wedding photographers that sometimes shoot outdoor weddings
I used it indoors in a tough lighting situation. You can not assume that mostly wedding photographers will be buying this lens. This is a staple or should be a staple of every full frame photographers bag. 24-70 and 70-200. Following down the road would be other specialty lenses.
Jared Polin if you’re already a Canon 70-200 2.8 IS II owner, would you upgrade or change to the Sigma or Canon....or just keep your version II?
@@Darthbishop no way: 70-200/2.8 II is really the same as the III version, just 1 coating missing. not worth upgrading to the mkIII and since this Sigma sport and Tamron G2 looks very similar for picture quality - why would you upgrade? (I have the mkII and won't spend money changing it :D )
Tamás Szügyi good points!
way less flaring than the ver2 of the canon L lens. photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1503975 Reviewed it a month ago
Tremendous real world comparison, as usual, Jared. You're the best out there at testing, comparing and reviewing cameras and lenses. Even someone like Michael the Maven, who puts in a tremendous effort with his comparisons, doesn't do truly real world reviews. He shoots "set up" scenarios. A girl jogging on a field is nothing like a bunch of overlapping people moving erratically and competing for a ball (and competing for the camera's AF attention at the same time).
I love the way you demonstrate that almost any camera can get the job done, while other reviewers try to convince us we need the latest and greatest camera to capture a good shot, which is utter nonsense.
Your efforts are truly appreciated.
Glad the 6DII is getting some love. Despite it's flaws, it's such a good camera, in the right hands.
Wanako Plays! Same :) I love mine
But sony fanbois be like BUT DR!
Love mine too!
I got to use one with the signs art 50 f1.4 and it was a pretty good camera. Not nearly as good as a d850
the d850 blows the 5d mark iv away spec and performance wise though, so its not really comparable to the 6d mark ii
@Jared Polin .. i gotta say i really love your Reviews as there is no BS nor bias towards one Lens or the other just good honest feedback on how they perform in real world situations ..
The review I have been waiting for. You made the choice pretty easy! I'll be picking up the Sigma soon and cannot wait to get it. Keep up the great work and thank you!
Did you bought it?
I'm so glad you found the sigma to be solid. I've been looking forward to this lens for a long time. Now I just need to pull the trigger on a body upgrade. lmao.
Korey Bartos check Facebook marketplace religiously. I just got my new 1Dx mk ii for a great price. There’s always some nice bodies from people who are updating, or switching brands
@@micklemons8885 Curious, what did you get the mk ii for?
Luke Zacharias photography and videography. Plus it was my favorite of canon’s line up. Basically I got it because I liked it lol. Definitely wouldn’t recommend it for stuff like portraits, etc, even though it holds up beautifully. At the end of the day it’s still a specialty camera for sports and wildlife.
I'd love to see a direct comparison with the Canon, Tamron and Sigma now that all of them have a "newer" version out.
Really care about the glass quality, and better, long-lasting usage ?
Put the bucks in and go for Canon.
Canon glasses are the best in market, no doubt about that.
I bought the Sigma today, I am definitely a beginner level and have two cropped cameras, my original Rebel t7i which I loved to learn on, and now my Canon 90d. This is the one I will be using with the lens. I have being doing some wildlife and outdoor desert shooting so I bit the bullet and added the 70-200mm 2.8 to my bag. Like you the store guy who has the Canon couldn’t justify the extra $600 for my level and needs. Thank you the video did calm me down after dropping a lot of money!!
I bought the Sigma 70-200 in early January
I doubted myself for not buying the Canon 70-200.
I couldn’t find very many if any video or written reviews on it. Just a bunch of content hyping it up.
This video made me feel 10000x better about the purchase.
Did the weight bothers you a lot?
Am choosing between the tamron and sigma and I am still choosing between those 2😂
Thanks bro! This will be my first 70-200 and Im going for the sigma thanks to your review!
@harolsblog How is the 70-200 after a year of using?
Yap Vi Seng I ended up purchasing the canon from a guy how used it 3 months for $1400 😬😬😬. With the written warranty from B&H. A year after, the Canon is a superb lens 😍😍😍 one of my favorites. Always search ebay for a good deal.
Don't worry, I got you. I just ordered the sigma, I'll post a review here in a few days letting you know how it is. @@hunterVworld
@@yeanisch how is it
@@isaija7943 it's been mostly great! It's super sharp, sharper than anything I've ever used before. Image stabilization paired with my Lumix IBIS makes filming at 200mm no problem at all, very stable footage. The colors are good, but not very saturated. My cheaper lenses give me much more contrast when filming. It's not a bad thing but something to consider. The focus is fast and accurate, the zoom ring feels kind of stiff but is becoming smoother as time goes on. The custom buttons can be very handy too. It's heavy and kinda big (my 150-600 feels lighter) and with the adapter I'm using, the length feels like a 400mm 5.6. The images I get from it are so good though, that I don't really care about the weight. Although I did recently purchase a 100mm 2.8 as a lighter short telephoto option, to make my backpack a bit lighter and to attract less attention when I take my camera out on the street.
I would still 100% recommend this lens. Best one I've bought so far.
I brought the canon version 3 right when it came out and it is a great lens, but sigma is really stepping up their game.
Awesome review Jared! They both look really good. As a Canon shooter I personally would get a Canon 70-200 II used. Besides that we all should consider Sigma and Tamron.
One critical point I’d love to see covered - how well the Warranty’s are covered and how quickly repairs are made.. Canon’s CPS Service is fantastic and often “on site” at major events. CPS is one major reason for some of the price differences in these products, and why you see so many real Pro’s are sticking with Canon. Coupled with their “loaner program”, their Pro Service means money in the bank.
On one of your videos you were able to review the contemporary lens for Sigma then that's when I decided to go for it. Some of us have photography as hobby and not able to afford expensive lenses. A year I got the Sigma contemporary lens 150-600mm ; then few days ago I purchased a used Canon 70-200 2.8 USM without IS. Thank you for taking the time to review both lenses.
Perfectly timed video Fro! I'm looking at upgrading to a f/2.8 lens for my Canon EOS-R to shoot high school lacrosse. I'm not entirely sure the 70-200 gives me enough reach (currently use Canon 100-400) but it might be my best option since games are in the evenings, under the lights and I really need a f/2.8 lens. Not sure there's another lens out there (under $2,000) that's going to match up. Any suggestions??? Thanks for all the great content!
Honestly like you said, these are two greats lenses. It depends on the personal choice of the buyer. Like me, my equipment is Canon since always. Thank you Jarod for all your tecnical informations, I never miss one! Have a nice day! Guy
Great review Jared. I'm currently in the market for the canon 70-200 but I plan to buy a used lens. There is a lot of pretty good deals out there for around $1100 bucks. Keep up the great reviews!
Hi Jared: the question is: how does this Sigma compare to the Tamron 70-200 G2 ?????? Eager to know (please)
Thank you!! I feel like that comparison is way more useful since they're both new lenses, both third party and both at a similar price point
I currently own the Sigma Sport and I absolutely love it!. I find it hard to believe that the Canon lens can produce better/sharper images. I think I might loan the Canon lens and try my own real life review
I made my decision for a few weeks for the Canon in via Amazon and the Canon winter sale and get for 1870 € compared to price of 2300€ in the Canon online store. And it’s a great lens! I really enjoy the photos made with this lens.
Came back to this Video since I see a Sigma 70-200 close with good price... forget the glass.. I appreciate you being human and missing focus on the eye a few times and comming clean and saying.. it's not the lens.. that is why we follow you. Thank you Jared. keep it up!
Ok Jared. At 17:40, when I look through the viewfinder that single point focus marker isn’t differentiating between the eye and eyelash. I’m not sure I agree with that point. I wouldn’t see how you you could say YOU missed that focus by that little. I’d say the canon prolly hit a little better there.
Just the review I needed. Thanks for the effort and putting this videos out, Jared, much appreciated!
I had the original 70-200 from sigma, always had trouble to get consistent focus on my 7D. I once rented the canon 70-200, non IS, mark I. consistent focus, sharpness even at 2.8. I kept my beloved sigma for 16 years (because heh, even if many shots were missed even if the af points were ok, i wont lie : i could manage to get nice pictures on a full event), but i moved to the canon mkIII version.
I was waiting for this video, since Nikon version just being released, would be great to see a real world review with that one against the nikon 70-200 versions VR versions. Anyone else agree?
One little thing you didn’t touch on but I think makes a difference... all of these cameras *nailed* the skin tone on these players. Yes darker skin is tougher to shoot but I’m willing to bet you didn’t do any EV adjustments. Both lenses and cameras handled it very well. All of your other points are solid and it does matter that you can flat out shoot. In the hands of a newbie they may see the difference with the weight and handling of the Sigma vs. the Canon. Plus the psychological effect of spending $2k on a lens makes it seem to perform better overall. Your review cut right though that. Great vid!
thank you so much for testing the sigma with the EOS R as I'm going to do the same for sports photos.
Just got my Sigma today, image quality is superb but I can’t stand how the tri pod collar can’t be taken all the way off. It would also be really helpful to have the zoom ring up front where the focus ring is instead
The “L Mount Alliance!” Never gets old! 😂😂
context?
@@thewritinglefty4889 Leica, Sigma and Panasonic are all L mount lenses, meaning they are interchangeable. Therefore you do not need an adapter. That's one heck of an alliance! Big savings there if you have more than one L-Mount brand.
@@a.deraville362 i think in the feture tamron is also goning to make l mount lenses.
Jared & FroKnows Team, thanks for this comparison video. I pleased to hear that the big third party names are improving their offerings. Although the Sigma is heavier and has a larger filter thread size, Sigma gives 3-year warranty compared to 1-yr for Canon.
QUESTION: Jared, are the buttons on the Sigma programable to toggle between AF Single and AF Servo or initiate the viewfinder level? Thanks in advance.
Hope you do this test with the MC11 adapter for us sony guys aswell!
Yep. You owe us! I bought A7iii after your review :D
@@bamit1979 rumor is that the 70-200 and 100-400 for native e mount were going to be released after the 24-70 which was just released last month. no point adapting it for a video if it's going to have a native variant released shortly
@@ynwadhd The 70-200mm E-mount will only be F4.
I don't get it! Why no steady studio or outside tripod shots to establish which renders best? How can a subjective view of their resolving performance be established at ISO 3200 and moving subjects in a dimly lit gymnasium? Speed of AF and ease of use ok but what about resolving power?
I just bought the new Sigma to replace my old SIGMA which weighs in at 2lbs. 9oz. This new lens is a TANK! I don’t think I’ll keep it. It’s very unwieldy for the fast moving action of ice hockey. Now conflicted between this Canon lens or the RF Canon 70-200 as I’ve purchased and waiting for a CANON EOS R6 to arrive...Two concerns...price of the RF version ($2,700!) and the extending lens when zooming. It’s great to have in the bag to make it easier to carry, but often I have to take photos from behind the glass at games and use a rubber hood to press against the glass. If my lens is extending and retracting all the time, I’ll have to wear rollerblades to keep moving since I don’t want to push through the glass! So, I think I may have answered my own question..get the EF lens with the adapter and have fun.
Great video. The "lens alliance" always makes me laugh. You mentioned the Tamron G2. How does that compare to the Sigma?
Nobody seems to make a comparison yet? I would like to see side by side
Jared - Awesome video, as usual. I have an EOS R with the EF adapter. I'm looking at getting the Sigma 70-200 with the 2x extender. Any concerns for image quality with all this on the camera at once?
I'm in the same boat and would like to know as well!
The lenses from the EF mount should work natively on the RF mount when using a native EF to RF adapter. What will you use this combination for, especially with the extender? I would never recommend a 2x extender. If you need the also reach, get another lens, use a 1.4x or crop a bit. If it’s for sports, you might be better with a Sigma 120-300mm S or Canon 300mm f/2.8L. If it’s for wildlife photography, I wouldn’t get anything less than 400mm. 70-200mm + 2x extender is not a good choice for wildlife photography. It would be better just going for the 100-400mm II or Canon 400mm f/5.6L.
I just purchased Canon R6 because of you :) Great review again! :)
Always respect your lack of bias when looking at gear Jared. Good review. Both pretty incredible lenses, the Sigma is astounding for the price. I have a Canon 6D Mark ii and think it is pretty remarkable for the price
Hey Jared. Thanks for the enthusiastic video on this lens.. I shoot with the Crop lens of a 70D and have this lens. It's my first go-to lens since I purchased the Camera 4 years ago. Great lens!
Hi, you mean the Sigma?
Thanks man for the very detailed but non-boring analysis. I'm a big fan of Sigma on EOS but you're right, the focus on moving subjects is not easy. Sometimes I focus manually.
Jared, I need you to know something. Please? I recently bought my M50. I'm the kind of dude that investigates, that does the due diligence, the puts in the time for the crime, baby! Reviewing hundreds of RUclips's on photography ....You are not like ANY of the other's. At all. If there was an Oscar to be given for performance, for truly embracing 'what the worlds most perfect vlogger' would be like. You would win. FROM: your overall production of the video's themselves, to the brand, to the explanations, with perfect speed, rhyme & tempo & pause, on delivery, knowledge & thought, to name just a few things! You're IT! Thank you for putting in your one of a kind passion into these video's. I blame you for my newly found passion, addiction. You're kinda like photo-knowledge porn. ..............
Jared outstanding breakdown! Thanks for taking the time to provide such detail analysis it helped with figuring out which one I am getting.
Fantastic video, Jared! You were thorough and fair. And everyone knows that as Tony and Chelsea always say, “Canon glass is awesome!” Yet you make a great case for the Sigma and for a non-professional, that might be the way to go. Also loved the way you put the EOS R to work in Temple’s gym. Great photos!
I think the main issue with Sigma has been that they haven't had the necessary access to get a similar level of integration. I personally haven't had issues with 3rd party lenses.
Northrup. Is ANYONE still taking these guys seriously?
Jared love your videos. I seeking a 70-200 for my Nikon, I Can not Chose betweetster the Tamron one or the Sigma one. In one video (baseball) you testen the tamron one and in a video (basketball) you tested the sigma. You never tested this thirdparty lensjes in one test. I’m looping for a good pinnsharp lens (thirdparty). Can you help me chose? Regards Daniel (Netherlands) and I shoot RAW ;)
Very helpful as always! Thank you so much Jared!
So would this fit my eos rebel t7i. I kinda want something for indoor sports 🏀. And weddings indoors and outdoors
This is probably a dumb question but I currently have a canon 5D mark 3, I would love to upgrade to a mirrorless canon or Sony in the future (late 2024). until then I have to buy a 70-200 mm lens and these are the two I am debating between. If I get this lens for my current canon will it work on the Sony Mirrorless camera if I choose to go with Sony instead on canon? Thank you for your help.
I own the 70-200 mm sigma 2.8 Non IS and although it's an oldy, it still stands its ground!! Great lens made by a great manufacture! I still don't understand why ppl would spend the colosal $$ on a red circle!
cant wait for the next 1dx.
Is there a review of the Sigma compared to the Nikon yet? Can’t wait and thank you!! Great stuff!
Great review Jared! Based on this review and your knowledge, how do you think the Sigma would handle shooting concerts and live shows? Thx!
Hey Jared i just wondering would you put the sigma 70-200 with the MC-11 on a sony a7iii? do you have pros and cons. as the sony 70-200 f2.8 is crazy money here in Ireland
I've been shooting with the sigma 70-200 sports on my A7Rii with the MC-11 for about a month, and for the most part it feels native. In low (REALLY low) light it can hut a tad, but I had the same problem with the 70-200 2.8 G Master. It would perform amazingly on the A7III, and even on my A7Rii, eye Eye AF works great.
The video AF works in continuous, but on my camera it always micro-adjusts the focus, all the time. You can't tell in the finished video, but it is audible through the mic. Let me know if you have any other questions, as I don't really think Jared will revisit this lens.
Does sigma have focus breathing issue like Tamron or Nikon?
nice review and thx for testing on the eos R
Thanks Jared, I found this very helpful. I bought the Sigma and use it on the EOS RP. It works fine and the images are as super sharp as you say, the bokeh is nice and the weight is actually ok. I found the autofocus to be sluggish though and I'm still contemplating, if I can live with that, but probably will, because the image quality is so fantastic and the price is right.
Slugish???? 4 real... Fist time i read this???
@@damjanstijovic1208 Yes, that was my impression. I traded it for the Tamron a week later and found it worked better with the autofocus. But that's just me.
@@Yankeededandy62 now you really scared me 😔
@@damjanstijovic1208 Just try it. You don't have to rely on my comment. I didn't do scientific testing.
@@Yankeededandy62 i would if i could 😔
This is an older video, so not sure if I will get a reply BUTT............ ))
I have a Sony A7R4 and no where near the budget to get the Sony 70-200 lens. I have been waiting 10000 years for Sigma to bring out their 70 - 200 but there is no sign of it being released any time soon. (Unless you listen to Sony Rumors, who rumor it will be out this coming last decade ago)
I'd love to take some quality Sports (Biking/Skiing etc) and Landscape photography but I don't know which cheaper glass to invest in?
You have a video reviewing the 70-180 Tamron, but I'm not sure how that would cope in a sports environment (plus missing out on 20mm feels like it could be annoying) ((That's what she said))
Maybe I could buy the Cannon 70 - 200 F4 with an adapter, but that's still pricey and I might need that better 2.8 aperture in wood/shaded environments.
OR
The Sigma 70 - 200 2.8 with the Canon to Sony Adapter? Would the auto focus be fast enough?
Do you have any future plans to help us mere miniscule money mortals? I would love a real world review so I could see what the best alternative options are.
As usual, fantastic review. You give all keys to do the best choice, thanks. 600$ cheaper but 300g heavier than the canon III that’s the question. We have to consider also the old canon version II which is very good too.
Also keep in mind that these are high end lenses, you're not likely to be replacing them unless they're destroyed, stolen or you switch systems. Over the course of a career, or even just hobby, the cost of a lens of this price isn't that much. Back in the days of film when you had to be paying per shot, you could easily hit this kind of cost in a couple years if you were doing a lot. Developing, even at home, isn't the cheapest thing in the world.
Great review its so detailed and realistic! I allways love your reviews and kodus to your team for the hard work God bless you Fro!....
Jared, you should do a comparison between 70-200 2.8 Tamron G2, Sigma Sports, or Nikon VR2. G2, Sports and used VR2 are all very similar in price, once the Sigma for Nikon is released
Thanks Fro. I went to two different stores today and just about put down my money to take the Canon home but thought I would watch a few more videos and came across this one. $600 is a big difference. I only want to buy it once. Ultimately, I think we justify what we want anyway but I do like other Sigma products that I have or have had. At the end of the day, using it with my SkyGuideer Pro, the lighter weight does make a difference and I will probably get back in my car and go by the Canon anyway. Seems like the sharpness, clarity, and noise were better with the Canon.
Better is relative at this point!
Now this might not matter to you if you upgrade your gear every year
but the one thing with 3rd party lenses is reliability.
How will the lens perform 6 months later after purchase
How often do i have to calibrate that's really where the main difference is. Reliability and longevity
Hey Jared I know this is an old video but did you have OS on when shooting the action? If so at what shutterspeed would the OS be not worth having on?
Not sure where you're located but it's great to see ECU in action! Thank you for that. Also enjoyed the thorough and informative review.
First off great video! What are your thoughts on buying a lens for a newer photographer when trying to decide between the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM vs. Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 sport. My wife plans to use it primarily for video footage of our son playing lacrosse, but plans to use it for photos as well. The price point difference between the two appears to be around $600 to $800. Based on my research the sport has weather sealing and 11 aperture blades vs 9 blades on the EX, along with some other minor differences (lens length and diameter). Wondering if it makes sense to spend the extra money on the sport version as it would be primarily for sports. We plan on pairing it with a Canon EOS R10. Thanks for your input in advance!
I'd like to see this lens made for Sony E
that would be cool.
it works fine with the mc-11 adapter
@@froknowsphoto If you tested this lens on the a9 with the mc-11 sony users would be very grateful!
That's exactly what I want too. I understand it is FF. Would it work well on an a6500?
I've also heard it works well with the MC-11, but would like to see a review like this that puts it to the test in a real world sport shooting condition, on either the A9 or A7III.
Great video as usual! I got the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 ex os hsm on my old Canon 6D and I'm happy with the result.
16:50 I actually like the sigma it's Boka looks nicer with a smooth roll-off were as the canon has a weird cut out looking thing around the woman in the background it looks awful and the woman in the foreground looks way more cut out and the border doesn't look pleasing at all
It seems the biggest complaints from those that have purchased and reviewed their Sigma lenses through Amazon, Adorama, B&H is the inconsistency of quality control. Some copies are better than others. I'd like to see some lab testing with different focus charts, particularly with Sigma, for resolution, aberration and vignetting. For the budget minded this would be a good start, or Tamron.
I don't do lab testing.
Just picked up a demo Sigma 70-200 f2.8 (sport) with an Mc-11 to play with (thank you Sigma) looking forward to taking it out for a test run...
Great review. Ok- so between Tamron G2 and this Sigma Sport, which would you choose?
It's super hard to say. The Tamron is lighter and less expensive. The Sigma is larger and a few bucks more.....
how you're doing i just got my canon 80d and i want a good zoom lens like the sigma 70-200 and it's all black and i see it takes great pictures. i want a few lens but i don't want to kill my pockets you understand. but i'm in love with sigma products and plus it's cheaper than canon. i guess those photographers can buy them cause they get paid i do this for fun and i want to be good at what i do ya see.i want to get this 70-200 f2.8 over the canon 55-250 so i want your opinion i'm going to buy the 18-35 sigma lens the 35mm 1.4 sigma lens and the 70-200 that's a good combination right? i was thinking 24-105 and the 24mm pancake lens and my collection is complete
Really great job with this review Jared! This is a lens that I’m definitely looking forward to purchasing.
Sigma has a strange fascination with making their gear HEAVY. Even here they give their lens a bigger front element than everyone else - likely to improve corner sharpness and vignetting. Personally I'd prefer not to break my back carrying it around, but that's going to be a highly subjective thing. Good to have the option I guess.
With modern cameras, you can usually fix the vignetting during raw conversion. Having that larger lens does cause issues that are more of a pain than running a filter to fix the vignetting.
Good lens. I'd probably still pick the Canon out of the two because it's a warranty it's gonna do well, on the Nikon side however seeing the price I'd pick the Sigma
Would the sigma work on the 32mpxl 90D?
Nice review, I have the Cannon 2.8 70-200 II and it's the best and worst lens I have. The best: because you can use it everywhere. The worst: It's so heavy. But all in all - I can't live without it.
Quality work. And excellent showcase of how a non-sports camera like the R can do it when being used properly.
Hey man, congrats on your work! From this day I will follow your videos. I think you explain yourself so clear and your tests and knowledge are so helpful. I think I'll go with the Sigma, I'm used to carry weight in my photography journeys in the mountains. ;)
How does this new Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 DG OS HSM | S compare to the ~10 year old Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM? Are the results comparatively that it's worth it to save more for the newer one?
If you have to pick between the sigma and tamron
Hey Jared... could you please suggest a better lens between this sigma 70-200 vs tamron 70-200 f 2.8 for Canon full frame dslr...
I'm still a student, looking to make money to invest in this hobby.
Guess I'll stick with the Sigma for now
This is such a hard decision. Do I save money and go for the Sigma or do I go with the lens that weigh less and easy zoom ring?
OK Canon 70-200 Version 2 or Sigma Art Sport.. they are both the exact same price right now if I was to buy one today. Which one is better? All around better lens?