Conditional probability tree diagram example | Probability | AP Statistics | Khan Academy

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 дек 2024

Комментарии • 36

  • @aaronastolfi7478
    @aaronastolfi7478 5 лет назад +38

    Sal got me through my engineering degree, thank you!

  • @bivshiyzek
    @bivshiyzek Год назад +7

    Fascinating! Thanks, Sal, I'm your biggest fun. I skipped a lot at school, and you're helping me to fill in the gaps. Greetings from Brazil.

  • @sasi849
    @sasi849 5 лет назад +14

    I love this the best probability video I've ever played. Thanks

  • @ethanmartinez836
    @ethanmartinez836 4 года назад +10

    The way he explains math better than anyone else

  • @asdfire
    @asdfire 7 лет назад +30

    Great hitmarker cursor

  • @MrNecropolice
    @MrNecropolice 7 лет назад +3

    Nice explanation. Thank you.

  • @mathteacher2651
    @mathteacher2651 4 года назад +1

    Well done!
    thank you

  • @rafansyed8420
    @rafansyed8420 Год назад +2

    Sal tryna explain that he didn't do drugs
    You're not fooling anyone

  • @billyboi1662
    @billyboi1662 11 месяцев назад

    Thank you

  • @udaygawande104
    @udaygawande104 3 года назад

    Good explanation

  • @aqsavidhra7488
    @aqsavidhra7488 5 лет назад

    thank you sal

  • @Sukant98
    @Sukant98 5 лет назад

    Really helpful thanks

  • @dawitdereje2690
    @dawitdereje2690 4 года назад

    You are the best

  • @obeytheMIGHTY
    @obeytheMIGHTY 3 года назад +1

    shouldnt you multiply the 500 on drugs by the true positive rate not the true negative rate

  • @3a9im27
    @3a9im27 Год назад

    Better call Sal:-)

  • @Jim99O
    @Jim99O 3 года назад +1

    Did he mix up false negative and positives, or am I just confused?

  • @yassinovo
    @yassinovo 2 года назад

    if it is stated that 5% of the applicants are actually on drugs, shouldn't the test be irrelevant when selecting randomly?

    • @rithvikthachappilly8088
      @rithvikthachappilly8088 3 месяца назад

      no because there is a 5% chance that the guys were actually on drugs. sorry for replying 2 years later im studying for an exam

  • @Graces_tunes
    @Graces_tunes 5 лет назад +2

    R U TAKING DRUGS?

  • @elnurmmmdov436
    @elnurmmmdov436 5 лет назад

    why didn't we divide by 500+190?

    • @richidubey8301
      @richidubey8301 5 лет назад

      Because we arent checking for the case where the test shows +ve.

  • @marianedaguno9709
    @marianedaguno9709 3 года назад

    Is this a dependent or independent pls someone tell me

    • @BananaSocks-101
      @BananaSocks-101 3 года назад

      Dependent.
      First event is whether applicant on drugs or not. Second event is whether test positive or negative. Second event's probability depends on outcome of first event, so events are dependent.
      Hopefully this is useful after 7 months )

  • @12345Hossam
    @12345Hossam 5 лет назад +1

    But aren't the 2% actually on drugs also since they tested positive? Since the 2% is a false positive rate, they got the result of not being on drugs incorrectly. So given the applicant tests positive, the probability they are actually on drugs are 100%. (I'm overthinking this maybe..)

    • @sd-xk7qr
      @sd-xk7qr 5 лет назад +7

      2% false positive rate means that the test shows someone who is NOT on drugs is on drugs 2% of the time

  • @sirjoshuafaw
    @sirjoshuafaw Год назад +1

    bro this is wrong.

  • @anthonyjake15
    @anthonyjake15 7 лет назад +5

    first :)