Just one part of their lies. This is a project for centuries. It will also be a start to more security and decease of Bosporus traffic since all scientists agree on that the current ship traffic is too much for safety and ecology. Today the traffic is about 43K large vessels. When Montreux was signed it was a mere 3K! And projections show it will only grow to numbers like 78K or 90K in the next 30 to 50 years. The traffic will ultimately will be slowed down to 25K a year and all others will have no choice but to take other routes.
@@kaiserkhan9832 erdogan is better than imamoglu. He destroyed terrorist PKK He discovered natural gas He defeated gezi park crazy protests He builds akuyu He will defeat imamoglu and chp
@Ezra Kızıl well said. all Id add is that Turkey is NATO's 2nd largest military by men. UNCLOS is not signed by USA or Israel. Turkey is good enough to protect europe... but not partake in its economy.. (NATO, but not EU)
As a Pole, what would you say if Denmark charged Polish ships money for passage through the natural waterways of the Store Belt and Øresund? In principle, it would be like Turkey asking for money from ships sailing across the Bosphorus. There are differences in international law between artificial and natural sea waterways. Natural sea waterways are considered international waterways around the world and are free of charge even if they are located in national territories. The only thing that states can require is the obligation to have a pilotage and that pilotage services have to be paid for by vessels. The situation is different with the use of artificial waterways (Canals), as these have to be financed and maintained by the fees. I live directly on the Kiel Canal and know what constant maintenance work is necessary. That's why a small sailing boat pays 12 euros and a 200 m large freighter costs 2,500 to 3,000 euros. In addition, there are similarly high costs for pilots and canal helmsman. That looks at 42,000 passages like a lot of money the state makes, but at least two-thirds of it goes to maintaining the canal. It will be similar with the Suez Canal, because it often silts up and the water depth has to be constantly adjusted. Greetings to the neighboring country.
Ha ha, Didn't Panama canal harmed environment? It didn't because of American dream. But any Turkish dream is the night mare of jealous Western countries .
Doesn't serve the narrative Remember we couldn't get rid of Erdogan with a coup from the outside now we must use our every media outlet to try and destroy him from the inside this includes sh*ting on every single accomplishment he might make
With the only one Big difference, this three highway is not used by citizens of the state but by foreigners who can cross it at any time without paying a penny, which is something that doesn't happen anywhere in the world.
It takes a strong leader to make brave decisions for it's nation and it's future, and not to be manipulated by some who don't want said nation to grow and be strong. Some don't like it just out of spite, he was refering to them. Every gigantic project like this has problems which needs solving, but that shouldn't stop them from doing it.
@@Anda146 the fact is istanbuli citizens hasn't had their opinion heard althought people will be displaced for that canal im sorry but you can't tell em erdogan hasn't become a dictator.
@@tessforbes8687 then maybe i am biased. I didn’t saw any one saying that it is a good project which somewhat prove that majority are happy with this project.
@@barbalsalazar8019 I was unaware of this project, so I’m unaware of any geopolitical factors. I agree that we didn’t see an interview with citizens who support the canal, however, it did explain the purpose of the canal. The negative aspect of this piece was the potential environmental damage. I didn’t get the sense that they were speaking for Germany or the EU or any other country. Outside pressure or influences aside it’s normal to assume, as I did, that with a huge project like this there will be people for and against.
They specifically said the people of Istanbul, not other parts of the country who probably favour it because they think it will bring them money. Damn sure I wouldn't want it going through my city when a route already exists.
That's why Turkish navey is protesting this project wright ? If it comes to progressing we have many trade deals, so no we can see trade with other, but that doesn't change the fact that this project is going to be unprofituble.
@@varangianguard4726 that's not true at all. There was always a Eurasianist part of military, that was close to Russia. But they are just a tiny part of past navy officials. Currently, we are in the beginning of a new doctrine which is Mavi Vatan and Turkey can't be binded by the agreements of over 80 years ago. Ask any Turkish jurists who are experts in international agreements. Lausanne and Montreux are outdated for many reasons and need to be fixed. Look at Greece, they certainly don't care about Lausanne. And Russia thinks what was hers in Tsarist era can be annexed today. These ain't nations who are upholding any old agreements.
@Agron 11 France, England, Armenia and Greece were swallowing the lands. So yes, under that reality they signed the treaty. If they are strong enough they can scrap the agreement, since only the powerful sets the rules. Till then, they can open a new canal.
They have an agreement signed till 2023 that the strait is considered international water. In 2023 it will be monetized...hence why the West is getting a stomach ache
@@emreaka3965 does Germany allow visa free entry for non erdogan supporters? You are all turks (non european) for them if u don't need that a lot of poor Turkish people would need that opportunity. They didn't allow it now or even with militarily secular Turkish governments
@@RealCherry8085 good or bad it's their own country....if it bad,bad for their people.....if it good then no problem....why other people form other care about Turkey anyway....
Let's get this straight. Turkey wants to make a new navigation channel to relieve traffic and still earn some money, but DW has taken a stand against it for environmental reasons. So that's because it must be really good for Turkey. DW's opposition is a strong indication that it will be good for Turkey and the world.
@@RedHair651 if Germany cares so much about ecology they can shut down nuclear reactors in all around europe(Since Germany is the backbone of European Union and Industry ) and stop mass producing and manufacturing cars and they should stop exporting cars to all around world.
They showed the same reason when the 3rd airport of Istanbul was being built. The migration of the birds will be in danger!! LOL!!! Yeaaaah, birds which have been living for several million years on earth are just dumb enough to not plan an alternate route. That's why they have been surviving through all these ages, right? :))))))) I mean a german media which does not give any attention to the corruption and delay of the new Berlin airport but instead focuses on Turkey's airport is really heartwarming. They do care more about the well-being of Turks and their birds than about the well being of their own population (!) :)
No this is not something that you can just make like an airport this thing is going to ruin nature and make a new city just so he can get money from arabs and katar this is a project THAT SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN
@@pho4328 İ just said the same thing in Turkish but these guys dont get it. This canal has the potential of dangering the ecosystem in the sea of marmara, which is already in danger because of the pollution.
Why DW news (I mean germany) is interested about this project anyways ? Turkey is a sovereign nation and it has every right to do whatever it wants in its territory. Periodt.
Brother, our hearts with Pakistan, we want the same thing as Turkish citizens to be stronger enough but in different perspectives. It will be more likely to spend so much money by wasting it. We want first peace in our geography and then trade. As a civil engineer of master degree, I don't suppose that its cost, secondary cost and other problems are resolved. It becomes a political stubborn which is unscientific due to the fact that it is cluelessness to insist on wrong things. Take it easy that we should defend and consider our own rights without leaving universal values such as science. 😉
you gusy from Qatar? bcuz Qatar people bought these lands before canal... the canal for Qatar people and Erdogan fans. bcuz they already boguht lands before canal. so Turkish people dont want it
People will export the cash distributed on them and that will weaken the country , not to mention that its just a bandage not a solution , turkey have changed much to the better since the current president took over , i can only say that , its a respectable country now unlike how it was before him
Everyone against it except Turkey . At the moment, no one is paying turkey when ships pass by the strait of bosphorus . So they dont earn a dime at all , unlike Egypt in Suez Canal. Hence, Turkey, is taking advange of this new project, creating a new Canal.
@@sharifmasum6360 Militiary vessels cant use the bosphorus. So they will have to pay to use the canal. Also, even though turkey cant stop ships from using the canals, they can create blockage: lenghthy inspections, health checks etc to make it too much trouble to use the bosphorus
Even as a foreigner know this project is only a nightmare to other countries but not turkey. After you build this you can make some "accidents" and close the so called public channel and make money from this canal like Suez. DW is only a biased media representing Germany.
Turkey gives away 8 billion dollars as foreign aid. They should cut 50 % of this aid money in order to support this project. , Once Canal Istanbul is completed I belive displaced residents will be provided with better housing facilities and they will have a good opportunity of trade and business. Its will be a benefit for the residents of this particular area and the nation as a whole. Most importantly it will attract more foreign investments and more tourist in turkey
@Mehmat BloodÀXE Invading ?? Do you really think future wars and conflicts will be done through invasions and conquest ?? That's so early 20th century and is outdated.
This! This comment should be pinned up. We all know why Europe is so against this project. But yeah, let's keep tell Turks it's about environment and earthquakes :)
@@egeaydn2794 Imagine you have more ships per year than the suez and panama canal combined but you dont collect fees. Thats billions of loss per year. For me the istanbul canal sounds like a really good idea.
@@egeaydn2794 I'd imagine the vast majority of people making statements pro Canal and anti Canal have no idea what they're talking about. The pro canal people are only pro canal because they're pro AKP. The anti canal people are only anti canal because they're anti AKP. This canal for better or worse will affect the nation far more than any short sighted political belief either side currently has. I don't know enough about the canal to know if it's a good thing or bad thing. What I do know that a project this large should be discussed with some intellectual honestly which I simply don't see. You strike me as the kind of person who would be for this canal if your "tribe" was in power.
pff. I remember When Erdogan was building the biggest airport of Turkey DW once again was typing silly about the situation. And than after a few month of compeleting the airport, the biggest airline company of Germany went bankrupt. Stop trying to save Turkey DW, save yourself.
I'm taking a wait and see approach. This report doesn't include the views of engineers attached to the project. The project may be expensive but it has huge ROI potential for Turkey and Istanbul in particular.
Views of engineers attached to the project are nonexistent. They are just being told to do their job to get paid. There are countless studies done on the subject, no credible scientist is in favor of this project.
Reporting about strong voices and opposition due to water quality and safty concerns against the project by people in instanbul = the western world is upset? Maybe get your brain checked
Just think that Berlin was once covered in beautiful trees and water sources and then they cut everything and started building. Germans should protest for Berlin to be returned to its former state. Don’t you think so, DW.?
Here in Germany, every infrastructure project always is controversial because "trees, birds...". so the entire country looks like 1960. now we are jealous of other countries who are building modern buildings and infrasturcture. Embarassing!
That one canal is used by the whole world without paying a dime, all the pollution is a bonus for Türkiye. Of course it HAS to change. This cannot continue.
Your report has not mention how dangerous is the current situation by passing the Oil and chemical huge vessels to Istanbul city this will create a desister to Istanbul in case of any accident or canal blockag be realistic
Ok because dislocating thousands of people, polluting the sea with the construction of the canal, and charging turkish people with billions of dollars is good. Wake up and dont try to justify your dictators moves.
You fail to mention that having 1 canal and increasing ship traffic will be even more dangerous for Istanbul. Also, according to captains of tankers, the new canal should suffice regarding safe passages... What is your source? Don't tell me it is the opposition... They lack scientific knowledge...
@@polydorosvogiatzis5120 Like you care Türkish people so much , you write these all just to oppose against the government of Turkey , when i look at you all i see is the dead childs killed in bath tub in cyprus by eoka and only fault they had was being Turk and they are unforgatten, you dont write these comments because of pollution or because you are so sad about dislocated Turks , there are hundreds of property owner Turks whose properties stolen and taken by force in aege islands. why dont you start giving them back or send some money to Turkey , or pay a visit as you care about Turkey so much, you can start funding atleast the Greeks in Turkey therefore we can see how much you care
@@turukatrak1721 Well looks like you kids dont learn enough at school. Turks lived in aegean islands and greeks lived at cities like cesme Constantinople and smyrni but after the greek revolution in 1821 all those people(both greeks and turks) were forced to move at the other side by the greek AND the turkish government. Also what happened in cyprus was a crime since you captured half the island. Greece was just there to help Cypriots. You started that conflict so you cant complain. That turkish cypriot state is still not recognised by most of the countries in the world
@@polydorosvogiatzis5120 hahaha kid ? Let me explain for you then old Man since i am a kid , but let me tell you , during ww1 and even the time after ww1 There were enough Turks in the islands such as kos,crete,mittilni and almost all islands had Good amount of Turkish people in it, my grandmom who is from mittilni, they were one of the richest family in the island and everything forcibly taken and they are forced to move or be killed if not..her family had a palace in island this happened around 1900s all their wealth , shops, houses and everything left , Nobody cares who lived where greeks did it , you are even too afraid to teach rotten greek soldiers in aege in your education system, how your soldiers became sands in the coast of aege because of that so called megali idea, why it has no place in your education system , you dont teach anything about this failed campaign , because you was only lapdog and the imperialists that stirring you against the Turks didnt support you when things Gone bad , you just left used and your people died for nothing , greek military archives accepts that so even if you dont , wouldnt change lot for me
Bosporus is not a canal it is a strait like gibraltar, you can't get a passing fee from a natural strait. How could you make such mistake? Other than new canal is totally useless.
The only hole is that the waiting time will be longer and longer and shipping companies would pay to use the canal. Means, you can wait several days in istanbul to pass the bosporus for free or you pay and pass via canal.
@@ac4633 how? Maximum waiting time is 14 hours currently and You can't force anybody to use canal. Each year numbers of passing ship from strait declining, how could you so sure? Have you got a shipping company?
@@risingsun8609 The narrowest part of the strait is 680 m , I think it cost too much for that kind of structure just for narrowing and I'm pretty sure there are international law against that. The funny part is the new canal's widest part is 300 m, less than half of the narrowest part of strait. And people claims it is safer passage. An accident could be dissasterious.
Montrö yüzünden ücret alınmıyor. Bu şartla boğazlar Türkiye'nin denetiminde. Yoksa orada boğazlar komisyonu olacaktı. Bayrağı ayrı ve her ülkeden üyenin yönetimde olduğu bir komisyon.
Not greed. Traffic in Bosphorus is too much. And turkey can't earn even 1$ from it. Canal istanbul will boost turkey's economy. Offering jobs and investment
This analogy works only if you have ads that goes for hours without a addon or app that blocks them. Ultimately Turkish govt. already gave out a number of scientists that put the number of passings through the Bosporus at 25k/year for a healthy environment and risk free passing of the straits. Which is already half of what is now going through. Therefore, put on some more unskippable ads to your RUclips and some off days for server maintenance, and you're good to go!
@@bulutuss ottoman empire had no arabic music,influenced mostly by greek and ancient sumers and armenian instruments.Turkish music culture influenced minimal on arabic culture and i myself never heard this kind of music in my life as a turk.
@@narxes Yes we did influenced but not heavily.Our culture is so much similar to balkans or armenians.Because instead of get influenced by the southern arabs,we influenced where we settled;anatolia.Anatolia had a rich culture and we mixed our cultures with them,mostly greek or armenian or ancient sumer and hittites etc. Even our well-known desert baklava is from sumer-mesopatimian origin.And our music influenced may the least from other segments of social life. Greek or armenian influence is so much more in our music culture and arabic is veeery little.I never heard this kind of music in my life as a turk.Yet these kind of news channels tries to make people think like this is the turkish music. And i hate that.
@@bulutuss i mean you say ottoman music is not arabic and you are right,but this is not ottoman music,this is definitely arabic music.That was my point man
@@bulutuss yahu allah allah çok bilmiş gibi durup niye konuşuyosun dostum.Tarih okudum osmanlı müziğiyle arap müziğinin uzaktan yakından alakası yok,türk miletinin en az etkilendiği alandır bu.İkincisi Bu videoda kullanılan def,sistrum gibi çalgılar türk-osmanlı müziğinde yoktur.Darbuka hariç arap müziği enstrümenlarıyla çalınmış bir müzikle osmanlı müziğinin ne alakası olabilir?Hayır niye kabul etmek zor arap taşağı aşığımısın kardeşim bezdirdin be.
The Bosphorus, through which approximately 43,000 ships pass annually, is a natural waterway with a narrowest point of 698 m. The increase in tonnage in ship traffic, the increase in ship sizes as a result of technological developments, and the increase in the number of ships (tankers) carrying fuel and other similar dangerous/toxic substances pose a great pressure and threat on Istanbul. In the Bosphorus, there are sharp turns, strong currents, and vertically intersecting urban maritime traffic with transit ship traffic that risk waterway transportation. Hundreds of thousands of residents live on both sides of the Bosphorus. The Bosphorus is a place of commerce, life and transit for millions of Istanbulites during the day. The Bosphorus is becoming more dangerous every year in terms of the risks posed by the passing ship traffic. The annual number of ship transits, which was 3-4 thousand 100 years ago, has increased and has reached 45-50 thousand today. Due to the one-way traffic organization implemented to increase navigational safety, the average waiting time in the Bosphorus for large ships is approximately 14.5 for each ship stuck in hold. is the hour. The waiting time can sometimes take 3-4 days or even a week depending on the ship traffic and weather conditions and sometimes an accident or malfunction. In this framework, it has become mandatory to plan an alternative transit corridor to the Bosphorus. Safe travel for our people will be ensured by preventing the risk of fatal accidents caused by the 90-degree vertical intersection of the ships transiting the city lines, which carry 500 thousand passengers a day, with Kanal Istanbul.
@@bastiananuss1727 If someone doesn’t take the time and research to find Turkish music, then what should I expect on the rest of the video? Obviously poorly done with minimal effort.
Earth to series movies.. turkey used to write I arabic alphabet before the collapse of the ottoman empire.. they are pretty much the same. Same religion too sooo.. It's ok don't be ashamed about it!
1:14 "... and majority of its people (istanbulies) oppose this project." while @DW shows a hundred people protesting against this project. Grow up! Show some real survey report. Even conducted by some western ngo.
If Germany have the same opportunity to build something like this they would just build it and everyone would hear for it once when it’s done lol. but here we are talking about Turkey and their own good because we “love” Turkey 😅
Completly wrong. Politicans try to build Highways (for example the A20 in northern germany) but the politicans are not able to complete the Highway because of protesting citizens.
Ever heard of the power line through Bavaria, the progress of which is extremely delayed and disrupted by citizen protests? Did you notice that nord stream 2 was stopped?
Well that‘s typical about german journalism: Interview three people on the street who are against the venture and thus create the feeling that everybody in the country is against the project. I‘m no friend to the turkish government and not supporting this project at all. I just think that good journalism should be neutral as possible. Not onesided like this.
I work in a tv station until several years ago, usually we interview 20-30 people but only show maximum 5 with majority shown the most with at least 1 opposite view. The rest is filled with expert's view
You are contradicting yourself in this video, listen to yourself carefully and you would know. It explains you also can not find strong flaws in this project for Turkey but gains and loss for EU.
What loss for the EU? Romania and Bulgaria are the only EU countries there. If the tax on the channel becomes too much they will just drive down to Greece and ship their stuff from there.
I have only see tens of people in ur report ! Where is the majority of Istanbul residents ?! Did you made an public poll ? Such way you use in your report without evidence regarding salt water 💦 and other concerns confirm that Erdogan was right when he said that Europeans doesn’t like such big project .
DW and Germany have they ever seen any positive act in Turkey all your reports are attacking Turkey even if they do well. This is not fair and not professional
@@Levo_D_Angelo I don't think Germany should be compare with turkey. Turkey has nothing in front of Germany. Neither they have economy neither they have a influence like Germany
Ne ekonomik avantajı. Ön cepleri zaten paradan taşanların göt ceplerini de doldurmak istemeleri, sen ben gibi Ali'ye Mehmet'e yarar sağlamaz. Vatandaş çocuğunu besleyemediği için intihar ederken Araplar İstanbul'un keyfini sürecek orada. Hayal kurmayı bırakın, gerçekelere bakın.
@@alp3909 O kanala verilecek para olası İstanbul depremi için kullanılabilecekken ve ülke bir ton sorunla boğuşurken bu kanalın yapılması birden ülkeyi kalkındıracak sanıyorlar. Ekonomi çöp olmuş, işsizlik diz boyu, gelecek için umutsuzluk var, Marmara denizi resmen ölmüş ama sözde kanal daha önemli. Ek olarak bu kanalın yapılması Möntrö sözleşmesini de çiğneyecek ve dünya barışını da etkileyecek. Amerika Rusya ve Ukrayna arasında olan bitenlere karışmak istese parasını verip karadenize savaş gemisi bile sokabilir. Ülkeyi kalkındırma adı altında Katarlılar için Türkiyenin en güzel ve en çok tarihi değere sahip şehrini ortadan ikiye ayıracaklar ve bunu bu arkadaş destekliyor. Şaka gibi.
@@erhansolhan9564 ya Erhan Bey, yap-işlet-devretin nesini anlamıyorsunuz? Devlet yapmıyor burayı. Özel bir konsorsiyum yapıyor. Devlet para vermiyor. Vermediği paranın nesini aktaracak İstanbul depremine? Montrö'nün etkileneceğini nereden çıkardınız? Bu salak dw'ye filan mı inanıyorsunuz? Marmara denizi ve Çanakkale boğazı yerinde durmuyor mu? Buralar anlaşmaya dahil değil mi? Rica ederim... Kalan söyledikleriniz de ya yanlış, ya alakasız, ya saçma. Ama nihayet kanalla ilgili olmadıklarından, istediğiniz gibi düşünebilirsiniz.
The project will be beneficial for only some people who bought the lands that are located at the construction site. This is the missing part of the news. We should look at those people while talking about the project. Short-term economic boost is not mattered after destroying the nature of Istanbul and putting millions of people at the risk of an earthquake. Whereas the short-term economic boost is very controversial for the country's economy. You can't find any experts who speak in favor of the Canal Project. Besides, Turkey will lose the geopolitical importance gained with the treaty of Montreux. There is no government in Turkey that is capable to solve the economic crises and other problems.
they will probably stop and accuse the west of sabotaging their plans when they realize its not feasible only for them to victimize themselves when the economy hits rock bottom.
When there were 2 Suez canals, wouldn't it be a welcome thing for all the shipping companies ? And especially a few weeks ago ? And the Bosporus is on itself a historically rich natural canal and the heart of Istanbul. With every passing ship, there are a lot of dangers to the city and the historical objects inside it. When there would be a second canal, the Bosporus could breathe the first time. It is more than understandable that Istanbul needs its 2nd canal.
Turkey isn't allowed to monetize it, basically they can limit the passage in the Bosporus for safety reasons so that transits are forced to happen mostly through the canal.
@@mardbenzmura1446 None of what you said is correct. Polls of ship captains show that captains will prefer the HUGE one instead of taking a risk with canal. It is too narrow.
Today 45.000 ships go trough Bosporus. Pay nopfing nu do wait at least 3 days and does lose 50.000 dollar because they wait. When the Canal is build only 25000 ships Will be allowed to pass Bosporus... The others need to wait An week or pay 50.000 dollar and use the Kanal.
@Antime Canal Istanbul might be a good thing but i suppose that you're not really aware what this governments doing to Turkey for a long time. They make mega-projects likes canal, then they spend like 2x-3x the money needed to build these stuff so they can get their own profit. So they actually rob turkish citizens. I won't get into it deeper in a youtube comment but i have never seen an educated man or woman that is pro-canal. At least with AKP.
@Antime "don't believe in anything you hear from the opposition" - most naive thing I've heard in a while. Do you think the government would tell you about their mistakes and corruption in their own media? Get your facts from different sources and don't believe just one channel, especially if it's financed by your government. Or you will end up brainwashed.
Every project has some problems I agree with you but that water way help Turkish people for more job opportunity 🌲 was also cut in Panama canal but without infrastructure projects no country grow
Panama Canal splited central America and cut down transportion time in have this will not cute anything aspecialy when the port of triest will connect to the danube by railway.
Why would he want to build that? Oh, money! More money, more money! The people build it, private interests( Erdogan?) will run it and make all the money.
The thing is yeah it is about money but it is not about passing fees some fellows bought lands nearby of new channel so theye planning to make money from this lands
Love my Turkish Brothers and Sisters 🇸🇴🇹🇷 keep the good work and Make Turkey and Islam Proud. inshaAllah you guys will make it. no matter what the western media says about you. keep it up
this is sacrifice by Turkish people for future Turkish generation.... So many countries are obstructing means you are on a right path... Also imagine ship containing Ammonium Nitrate caught fire in Bosporus that like of the coast of Sri Lanka or Beirut..
Already Turkey has a right to inspect each ship which carries dangerous explosion materials. There are also some safety precautions on this issue. Each accident can be prevented beforehand why the accident is such a science.
@@volkanerkan3910 ah yes but they know they have a corruption problem and those who need to bribe also are the ones putting others in danger. So that option goes out the window.
German media, specifically. Germany is heavily involved in international trade, and much of that trade passes through the Turkish Straits, so of course, they aren't going to appreciate new tolls. The potential military application of this project could actually be beneficial to NATO as a whole, but Germany has shown how willing it is to disregard the interests of its allies.
1:13 the reporter said, "and the majority of Istanbul’s citizens are against it", how a small organized group politically motivated seems to you as a majority of Istanbul’s citizens? Neutral journalism Should be the standard DW. U may not like Erdogan but report neutrally as It's the main Base of Journalism.
@@sharequsman596 it is bad for nature AND the economy in turkey is already bad because of erdogan but he keeps investing in useless projects. there was no need for a canal! trust me, if you lived in turkey you would say something else. you only see the cover of the book but not whats inside of it…
DW was against the new Istanbul airport also 😅😂😂 . Imagine German news stopped anything and cares about Turkey s projects 😅 . If you care about Turkey stop supporting pkk ;)
Ahaha again German media and again a critic about one of big projects in Turkey. Why Germans so interested in this? Also try to find canal project supporters too, not just opposites. What kind of journalism you do!!!
What a nightmare. Reform the Montreal Treaty instead. Goodness, there is nothing more important than potable drinking water and good agricultural land. How dangerous are these "Strong men".
@@ThisandThatj What kinda scale is this?So every western journalist makes news just because they are enemy of Turkey?Oh no wonder you blaming every problem in Turkey as doings of " DIJJ güçler".Take that period and buy yourself a brain ok?Yeah I'm sure goverment sided journalist definitely thinking benefit of Turkey not their cut.Just like Presidental election you are deciding just base on your fanatism.THİS İS A PROJECT BENEFİT NOONE BUT AKP AND CONTRACTİON COMPANİES.
Wow, every aging politician has it's own megalomaniac plan. This reminds me of a plan here in Czech republic. Our president has a vision of cutting a canal through Moravia which would connect rivers Danube, Oder and Elbe. Nobody needs it, it is a disaster from an environmental point of view and economic benefits are overestimated at best. At the same time we are in dispute with Poland over their mining operation that is most likely draining water from the border region. I am sure Erdogan would not risk water supply for Istanbul over a dream project. Surely it is not about his ego and him trying to be bigger than Ataturk.
@@based9 Of course, it would be foolish to expect you to understand the impact of the project on the nature, as you just dismissed the entire local nature as "a lake and a few hills". You're a kid after all. Your mental capacity has not matured yet. But don't worry, you'll soon understand how pointless of a project this is. Open your eyes and see the truth, kid. You've got a long life ahead of you.
I mean it effectively removes influence from people already in Istanbul and diverts it to those who own the land around the canal being built, who are all people in Erdogan inner circle.
@@anonymusgnc8572 it is not useless... Each day of waiting costs the avarage tradeship about 3000 dollars... So if a tradeship waited 3 or 4 days it will lose about 10,000 dollars... Which means that any fee less than 10,000 dollars will be financially beneficial for the the avarage tradeships ( the bigger the ship, the more costly waiting becomes, so most small ships will keep using the Bosporus, while big noisy traderships will go to the new canal)
@@مالكالقطيف well 200 years ago most Egyptians probably didn't even know about this project. It's important do look out, if mega projects are done properly.
An abrubt ending that could be better edited.
mi mi mi
"short term economic boost", no my friend when you build something like a canal it is considered *long* term.
Just one part of their lies. This is a project for centuries. It will also be a start to more security and decease of Bosporus traffic since all scientists agree on that the current ship traffic is too much for safety and ecology. Today the traffic is about 43K large vessels. When Montreux was signed it was a mere 3K! And projections show it will only grow to numbers like 78K or 90K in the next 30 to 50 years. The traffic will ultimately will be slowed down to 25K a year and all others will have no choice but to take other routes.
@@kaiserkhan9832 yeah, then try and debunk götveren
@@kaiserkhan9832 keep civil the comment section. And just answer with commen sense arguments.
@@raytanxo609 are jihadis going tot teach me civility? Lol you are on some drugs my man.
@@kaiserkhan9832 erdogan is better than imamoglu.
He destroyed terrorist PKK
He discovered natural gas
He defeated gezi park crazy protests
He builds akuyu
He will defeat imamoglu and chp
If turkey could tax bosforus then they won't build new canal. Egypt have huge revenues from Sues canal.
Greetings from Poland
@Ezra Kızıl well said. all Id add is that Turkey is NATO's 2nd largest military by men.
UNCLOS is not signed by USA or Israel.
Turkey is good enough to protect europe... but not partake in its economy.. (NATO, but not EU)
As a Pole, what would you say if Denmark charged Polish ships money for passage through the natural waterways of the Store Belt and Øresund? In principle, it would be like Turkey asking for money from ships sailing across the Bosphorus. There are differences in international law between artificial and natural sea waterways. Natural sea waterways are considered international waterways around the world and are free of charge even if they are located in national territories. The only thing that states can require is the obligation to have a pilotage and that pilotage services have to be paid for by vessels. The situation is different with the use of artificial waterways (Canals), as these have to be financed and maintained by the fees. I live directly on the Kiel Canal and know what constant maintenance work is necessary. That's why a small sailing boat pays 12 euros and a 200 m large freighter costs 2,500 to 3,000 euros. In addition, there are similarly high costs for pilots and canal helmsman. That looks at 42,000 passages like a lot of money the state makes, but at least two-thirds of it goes to maintaining the canal. It will be similar with the Suez Canal, because it often silts up and the water depth has to be constantly adjusted. Greetings to the neighboring country.
Ha ha, Didn't Panama canal harmed environment? It didn't because of American dream. But any Turkish dream is the night mare of jealous Western countries .
So dumb on so many levels.
if there wasn't the panama canal, ships would have had to detour thousands of kilometers. same for the Suez. what's bosphorus excuse? money?
@@rusu989
The traffic jams, accidents waiting to happen. Just remember Lebanon.
Absolutely correct bro..
In Germany we call that a MASSIVE tax wasting
its an investment. ships will pay for it
@@amziw7251 but well there is the Bosporus, where ships can cross for free...
@@kentrosyt turkey could probably block bosporus so canal istanbul will be the sole canal but idk its not my country
In Germany there is NO Bosphorous...so don't talk about something you dont know of.
@@archhangell well, we have also really wasted tax money. Like BER or Stuttgart 21. But yes, we have no Bosporus
Why didn't you interview any proponent/supporter of the Canal?
What happened to journalistic objectivity?
Doesn't serve the narrative
Remember we couldn't get rid of Erdogan with a coup from the outside now we must use our every media outlet to try and destroy him from the inside this includes sh*ting on every single accomplishment he might make
Don’t be dumb. This video is an opinion piece so it gets to express opinions. I bet if they only included proponents you would be fine though
yeah, because they have no problem with the canal they have problem with Erdogan.
Deep pockets
lol there aren't much supporters. i'm turkish and people who support erdogan mostly don't want it too...
This is like building parallel highway to existing free one just so new one can have a toll.
Let's say it's sophisticat way to make money
or maybe its so more trafic can be managed than with just 1? and better safety as well
@@Anda146 Bosphorus is wider and shorter than Panama and Suez.
Check out the Dulles Toll Road in Virginia. It's exactly that.
With the only one Big difference, this three highway is not used by citizens of the state but by foreigners who can cross it at any time without paying a penny, which is something that doesn't happen anywhere in the world.
"Whether you like it or not" doesn't sound like a democratic leader
It takes a strong leader to make brave decisions for it's nation and it's future, and not to be manipulated by some who don't want said nation to grow and be strong.
Some don't like it just out of spite, he was refering to them. Every gigantic project like this has problems which needs solving, but that shouldn't stop them from doing it.
if u listen to All.. i believe theres LGBT in turkey rn
@@Anda146 the fact is istanbuli citizens hasn't had their opinion heard althought people will be displaced for that canal im sorry but you can't tell em erdogan hasn't become a dictator.
@@egyptian3682 you mean animal?
@@dedekkurniawan5741 wdym?
Opposition says that it is “Qatar İstanbul” project not canal.
typical greeks...
@Abdülhamid allah ikinci bi kanal isteseydi öyle yaratırdı, o yüzden kanalı yapmak şirk
@yarı hamsi yarı insan Karadeniz tanrısı Madem ingilizce bir şey yazacaksın bari çeviriyi kullan be adam
@yarı hamsi yarı insan Karadeniz tanrısı Dedi bir Istemezüükcü
@@thegreatdouble5913 Kardeşim, sen şirkin ne olduğunu hiç biliyor musun? Kanalın dini açıdan hiç bir sakıncası yok. Doğayı tehdit ediyor sadece.
When present only one side of the picture then you become bias media. You may lose credibility.
It did explain both sides.
@@tessforbes8687 then maybe i am biased. I didn’t saw any one saying that it is a good project which somewhat prove that majority are happy with this project.
@@barbalsalazar8019 I was unaware of this project, so I’m unaware of any geopolitical factors. I agree that we didn’t see an interview with citizens who support the canal, however, it did explain the purpose of the canal. The negative aspect of this piece was the potential environmental damage. I didn’t get the sense that they were speaking for Germany or the EU or any other country.
Outside pressure or influences aside it’s normal to assume, as I did, that with a huge project like this there will be people for and against.
They specifically said the people of Istanbul, not other parts of the country who probably favour it because they think it will bring them money. Damn sure I wouldn't want it going through my city when a route already exists.
@@tessforbes8687 agree
Problem with Europe is they cannot see anyone else progressing....controversy is only on the minds of europeans
what is a good thing Europe FIRST
That's why Turkish navey is protesting this project wright ? If it comes to progressing we have many trade deals, so no we can see trade with other, but that doesn't change the fact that this project is going to be unprofituble.
@@varangianguard4726 that's not true at all. There was always a Eurasianist part of military, that was close to Russia. But they are just a tiny part of past navy officials. Currently, we are in the beginning of a new doctrine which is Mavi Vatan and Turkey can't be binded by the agreements of over 80 years ago. Ask any Turkish jurists who are experts in international agreements. Lausanne and Montreux are outdated for many reasons and need to be fixed. Look at Greece, they certainly don't care about Lausanne. And Russia thinks what was hers in Tsarist era can be annexed today. These ain't nations who are upholding any old agreements.
Do you know how I know Turkey is doing the right thing? When DW says otherwise.
Erdogan & co. are not Turkey.
and bbc
@@TheLastTocharian As far as the definition of democracy is concerned, yes they are Turkey as they have been elected by the people of Turkey.
This is a bad project. DW is right. You are wrong
@@chumkrimson8161 DW is right, we are left. This is the way!
If the European media is against it then it is good for Turkey
Reasoning like a child.
Hahaha, exactly. Instant thought I had. Lol
@@xazax2641 Then, you haven't watched enough of western media.
You logic is also very impressive.
As a european I agree. Only fools do mot see that the west lies about russia china turkey and vice versa
Funny how EU news criticism of turkeys plans for the canal when it would give a long term economic and political boost
💯
But tbf i don't think the volume of trade for nations in the bosphorus can bring in that much benefit
After opening of canal istanbul, no ship will be able to go through the bosphorous...because there will be the turkey navy military.... 😄
@@Matt_pitter 💯
@Wake No. Whose truth and to whose benefit that is what I'm trying to point out
You are using current Bosporus passage without paying for the past 90 years. Why not pay since you care for the environment?
@Agron 11 France, England, Armenia and Greece were swallowing the lands. So yes, under that reality they signed the treaty. If they are strong enough they can scrap the agreement, since only the powerful sets the rules. Till then, they can open a new canal.
They don’t want turkey doing well
They have an agreement signed till 2023 that the strait is considered international water.
In 2023 it will be monetized...hence why the West is getting a stomach ache
@@ertugrulbae46 completely not true. It has no expiration date.
@@ertugrulbae46
You are taking stupidity to new levels.
Here is a suggestion: up the volume of the background music even more so we do not hear a single word.
I had no trouble hearing everything. Maybe you have to switch off your potato if you don't want to hear words.
If DW is against this Canal, Turkey has to construct it for sure.
Your logic is very impressive.
😂😂😂👏🏻👏🏻
OMG YOU ARE GENIUS
@@emreaka3965 does Germany allow visa free entry for non erdogan supporters? You are all turks (non european) for them if u don't need that a lot of poor Turkish people would need that opportunity. They didn't allow it now or even with militarily secular Turkish governments
@@ArchieReviewsUKDeals What are you talking about?
It is a big lie to say that the majority of Istanbul residents are against Canal Istanbul
They are
50/50
Def arabs that forpurchased the surrounding acres want it
Canal İstanbul is a good project for Turkey it should be continue. Yes it is not good for EU.
It would be an ecological disaster primarily for Turkey.
Why its not good for EU?
It's not good for Russia, Bulgaria and Romania m.b rest of EU don't need to Export from Bosporus xD
@@RealCherry8085 good or bad it's their own country....if it bad,bad for their people.....if it good then no problem....why other people form other care about Turkey anyway....
@@RealCherry8085 now came patanjali economist....🤣..better focus on ram rajiya up
Let's get this straight. Turkey wants to make a new navigation channel to relieve traffic and still earn some money, but DW has taken a stand against it for environmental reasons. So that's because it must be really good for Turkey. DW's opposition is a strong indication that it will be good for Turkey and the world.
Didn't you hear the ecologist in the video? He clearly stated why this would be problematic.
@@RedHair651 if Germany cares so much about ecology they can shut down nuclear reactors in all around europe(Since Germany is the backbone of European Union and Industry ) and stop mass producing and manufacturing cars and they should stop exporting cars to all around world.
They showed the same reason when the 3rd airport of Istanbul was being built. The migration of the birds will be in danger!! LOL!!!
Yeaaaah, birds which have been living for several million years on earth are just dumb enough to not plan an alternate route. That's why they have been surviving through all these ages, right? :)))))))
I mean a german media which does not give any attention to the corruption and delay of the new Berlin airport but instead focuses on Turkey's airport is really heartwarming. They do care more about the well-being of Turks and their birds than about the well being of their own population (!) :)
I remember a video of DW criticizing Istanbul Airport. Well it's currently the most used airport in Europe. How similar the things are.
No this is not something that you can just make like an airport this thing is going to ruin nature and make a new city just so he can get money from arabs and katar this is a project THAT SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN
@@happybutsad7066 Wow ruining nature and making money, the same arguments.
not the same thing amk geri dönülemez bir hasar verecek bu kanal bize.
the slight fact that an airport can be demolished while a man made canal can not
@@pho4328 İ just said the same thing in Turkish but these guys dont get it. This canal has the potential of dangering the ecosystem in the sea of marmara, which is already in danger because of the pollution.
Turquia is beautiful. Friends from Brazil.
abrigado.. mi amor mucho bueno Brasilia
Is Brazil a corrupt country?
ı love brazil rio de janeiro
too arabic, not turkish anymore
@@egeaydn2794 yes, it’s. It’s one of the worst problems in Brazil.
Why DW news (I mean germany) is interested about this project anyways ? Turkey is a sovereign nation and it has every right to do whatever it wants in its territory. Periodt.
Why do you care Oussama, you are not Turkish, we Turks know that this canal is waste of our taxes.
@Huso Ucar and how do you know that ? Interviewing 3 random people in istanbul. A city of 16 million people is far from being a representative sample.
@@oguzb.7033 you do realise that turkey is a multiethnic society. There are arabs greeks armernians persians kurds etc.
@Huso Ucar how do you know the majority oppose the canal?
@@TheBooban wrong
I am from Pakistan and we want a stronger Turkey. Canal must be built if it will benefit Turkey in future.
Brother, our hearts with Pakistan, we want the same thing as Turkish citizens to be stronger enough but in different perspectives. It will be more likely to spend so much money by wasting it. We want first peace in our geography and then trade. As a civil engineer of master degree, I don't suppose that its cost, secondary cost and other problems are resolved. It becomes a political stubborn which is unscientific due to the fact that it is cluelessness to insist on wrong things. Take it easy that we should defend and consider our own rights without leaving universal values such as science. 😉
Why don't you improve your own country too?
@@citizen-27 Because majority of our population is corrupt and a corrupt nation can never progress. Where do you belong?
Literally we are corrupt too
What a biased report ; the majority of its resident?? What you did a statistical study??
Long live Sultan Erdogan
you gusy from Qatar? bcuz Qatar people bought these lands before canal... the canal for Qatar people and Erdogan fans. bcuz they already boguht lands before canal. so Turkish people dont want it
@@kayacenk4164 you again came with your propganda..... uncle find a wife
@Ghost Ghost this guy kaya cenk is alevi from anatolia, not alwaite....
he's a troll.
Supporting high inflation in the country and investing in the livelihood of the people, rather than Canal Istanbul, affects the country well
The West is doing basically the same as Turkey
People will export the cash distributed on them and that will weaken the country , not to mention that its just a bandage not a solution , turkey have changed much to the better since the current president took over , i can only say that , its a respectable country now unlike how it was before him
Imagine being funded by the German government and still don't know how to do simple editing
What was it that noticed? Genuinely curious BTW.
Why don't the stakeholders consider renegotiating and revising the terms of Montreux Convention?
because West is against
Everyone against it except Turkey . At the moment, no one is paying turkey when ships pass by the strait of bosphorus . So they dont earn a dime at all , unlike Egypt in Suez Canal. Hence, Turkey, is taking advange of this new project, creating a new Canal.
@@rmetal2792 and why would anyone going to use new canal just to pay fee while there is free route which is also shorter?
@@sharifmasum6360 the same method apply to Highway.. There are people willing to pay toll then saving more time and hassle
@@sharifmasum6360 Militiary vessels cant use the bosphorus. So they will have to pay to use the canal. Also, even though turkey cant stop ships from using the canals, they can create blockage: lenghthy inspections, health checks etc to make it too much trouble to use the bosphorus
A very biased report from DW. You should represent both sides.
And poor editing at the end of the video.
dw is showing concern..!
it means this canal is very good deal for Turkey 🇹🇷
🤣🤣
Even as a foreigner know this project is only a nightmare to other countries but not turkey. After you build this you can make some "accidents" and close the so called public channel and make money from this canal like Suez. DW is only a biased media representing Germany.
Exactly
Enjoy Island Istanbul :))
Exactly! I am from Turkey and I support this project
Even allies and american military ship can cross new canal is can turn into political problem with Russia!
Nope, American ships still cant cross dardanelles, another straight under same Montrose convention.
@@muhammetatsyz6658 If there building New canal treaty will getting broke or bypass
It is problem between US & Russia, not turks business.
@@comander1242 no it wont, convention includes straights, not any other waters.
@@aanandika9975 Russia might make it turkeys problem
❌Canal Istanbul
✅Qatar Istanbul
I dont think Turkey could afford such a thing. they cant just use imaginary money. we are still paying for Edogan's private palace.
Nice dream
Turkey can afford, but so much amount of money will be wasted.
Turkey gives away 8 billion dollars as foreign aid. They should cut 50 % of this aid money in order to support this project. , Once Canal Istanbul is completed I belive displaced residents will be provided with better housing facilities and they will have a good opportunity of trade and business. Its will be a benefit for the residents of this particular area and the nation as a whole. Most importantly it will attract more foreign investments and more tourist in turkey
Wdym. Turkey is a rich country they can easily afford that 15 billion for that canl
@@eren6362 it's not 2012 anymore the economy is declining
If west is saying its bad it must me good for Turkey 🇹🇷
Kendi fikrin iraden yok mu hayırdır? Onlar da İsa peygamber ve tanrısı tanrımızdır diyor, Şirk koşmak istiyorsan buyur bu fikirle devam et.
Think logically even i don't like west but the project is dangerous even i have turkish friends from turkey they are also against it lol
@@wwemusicworld3837 . I'm from Turkey and I support it..its our country and our decision I don't understand why you guys have to comment on everything
That's the point!
@Mehmat BloodÀXE
Invading ??
Do you really think future wars and conflicts will be done through invasions and conquest ?? That's so early 20th century and is outdated.
Don't know about turkey but definitely a nightmare for european countries.
This! This comment should be pinned up. We all know why Europe is so against this project. But yeah, let's keep tell Turks it's about environment and earthquakes :)
USA loves this project !
Turkish dictator is a nightmare for us turkish people too.
@@danijelamali8467 My real Turkish acquaintances disagree. You must be a supporter of pkk or ypg.
@@Nox1ous147 You can have your ''acquaintances'' in your country.
Lol.whenever any country finds a way to progress west have headache.
They know their time is over. Western world is doomed since colonial times are over.
This is not progression. It is regression.
@@egeaydn2794 Imagine you have more ships per year than the suez and panama canal combined but you dont collect fees. Thats billions of loss per year. For me the istanbul canal sounds like a really good idea.
"the west" don't care about this. Russia are the only ones with objections.
@@egeaydn2794 I'd imagine the vast majority of people making statements pro Canal and anti Canal have no idea what they're talking about.
The pro canal people are only pro canal because they're pro AKP.
The anti canal people are only anti canal because they're anti AKP.
This canal for better or worse will affect the nation far more than any short sighted political belief either side currently has.
I don't know enough about the canal to know if it's a good thing or bad thing. What I do know that a project this large should be discussed with some intellectual honestly which I simply don't see.
You strike me as the kind of person who would be for this canal if your "tribe" was in power.
If DW says it is not good for Turkey, it should be something wonderful for Turkey! Most people are aware of this truth ;)
pff. I remember When Erdogan was building the biggest airport of Turkey DW once again was typing silly about the situation. And than after a few month of compeleting the airport, the biggest airline company of Germany went bankrupt. Stop trying to save Turkey DW, save yourself.
Thier is big difference between Germany and turkey man
If you want my opinion on istanbul canal,remove the c and you get it.
If your enemy say this is not good for you do it
Who is enemy? Turkey gets the most export to Germany. They are partners in trade and politics.
I'm taking a wait and see approach. This report doesn't include the views of engineers attached to the project. The project may be expensive but it has huge ROI potential for Turkey and Istanbul in particular.
There are other costs besides financial though, like environmental damages.
@@WouldntULikeToKnow. True. Earthquake concerns.
The scientists views are unanimous.
Views of engineers attached to the project are nonexistent. They are just being told to do their job to get paid. There are countless studies done on the subject, no credible scientist is in favor of this project.
@@UmmadikTas yalancisin.... The professionals all say IT is okay.
Fun fact: *Most of the erdogan fanboys passionately attacking anyone who are criticising him, are not, actually from Turkey!*
They are from South Asia.
Just because it is easy to fool south Asian
@@antonio7497 Pakistan se hi hai bhai. Aur kaha milenge ummah ummah wale mand buddhi
Nope, more than half of the people in turkey voted for him, that's why he is the president.
@@antonio7497 if you think you are not easy to fool then you are already fooled
Yea boi 😂
If Europe says its not good than It must be good.....
western world is crying seeing turkey prosper. It is actually DW's nightmare
Reporting about strong voices and opposition due to water quality and safty concerns against the project by people in instanbul = the western world is upset?
Maybe get your brain checked
@@muhammetaydemir6019 there is this thing called logic, pretty old concept actually but more than ever relevant today
Maybe give it a try
Just think that Berlin was once covered in beautiful trees and water sources and then they cut everything and started building. Germans should protest for Berlin to be returned to its former state. Don’t you think so, DW.?
Berlin has a lot of forest and lakes
Turkey already decided to take a lead internationally and from this report it looks it is on right path
Hahahhahaa
Decided to take 2 leads. Maybe even 4 leads. If you’re gonna dream, dream big. 800 leads. 10000 leads
Long Live Turkey. Inshallah Canal will be completed and Turkey will become more strong.
Salam and Respect from Pakistan.
Here in Germany, every infrastructure project always is controversial because "trees, birds...". so the entire country looks like 1960. now we are jealous of other countries who are building modern buildings and infrasturcture. Embarassing!
When one canal is not enough, so you want another one
That one canal is used by the whole world without paying a dime, all the pollution is a bonus for Türkiye. Of course it HAS to change. This cannot continue.
@@YavuzSelim1981 sooo they decided to build another one, what a great solution to the polution
@@YavuzSelim1981 Boğazdan geçiş ücretini artırabilirsin. Geçmişte yapıldı ancak uluslararası baskı yüzünden yeniden eski geçiş ücretine dönüldü.
@@frenki6271 meanwhile the majority of people living at the east Turkey cant even afford food
@@YavuzSelim1981 if the bosphorus is free why pay for passage from another canal
Your report has not mention how dangerous is the current situation by passing the Oil and chemical huge vessels to Istanbul city this will create a desister to Istanbul in case of any accident or canal blockag be realistic
Ok because dislocating thousands of people, polluting the sea with the construction of the canal, and charging turkish people with billions of dollars is good. Wake up and dont try to justify your dictators moves.
You fail to mention that having 1 canal and increasing ship traffic will be even more dangerous for Istanbul.
Also, according to captains of tankers, the new canal should suffice regarding safe passages...
What is your source? Don't tell me it is the opposition... They lack scientific knowledge...
@@polydorosvogiatzis5120 Like you care Türkish people so much , you write these all just to oppose against the government of Turkey , when i look at you all i see is the dead childs killed in bath tub in cyprus by eoka and only fault they had was being Turk and they are unforgatten, you dont write these comments because of pollution or because you are so sad about dislocated Turks , there are hundreds of property owner Turks whose properties stolen and taken by force in aege islands. why dont you start giving them back or send some money to Turkey , or pay a visit as you care about Turkey so much, you can start funding atleast the Greeks in Turkey therefore we can see how much you care
@@turukatrak1721 Well looks like you kids dont learn enough at school. Turks lived in aegean islands and greeks lived at cities like cesme Constantinople and smyrni but after the greek revolution in 1821 all those people(both greeks and turks) were forced to move at the other side by the greek AND the turkish government. Also what happened in cyprus was a crime since you captured half the island. Greece was just there to help Cypriots. You started that conflict so you cant complain. That turkish cypriot state is still not recognised by most of the countries in the world
@@polydorosvogiatzis5120 hahaha kid ? Let me explain for you then old Man since i am a kid , but let me tell you , during ww1 and even the time after ww1 There were enough Turks in the islands such as kos,crete,mittilni and almost all islands had Good amount of Turkish people in it, my grandmom who is from mittilni, they were one of the richest family in the island and everything forcibly taken and they are forced to move or be killed if not..her family had a palace in island this happened around 1900s all their wealth , shops, houses and everything left , Nobody cares who lived where greeks did it , you are even too afraid to teach rotten greek soldiers in aege in your education system, how your soldiers became sands in the coast of aege because of that so called megali idea, why it has no place in your education system , you dont teach anything about this failed campaign , because you was only lapdog and the imperialists that stirring you against the Turks didnt support you when things Gone bad , you just left used and your people died for nothing , greek military archives accepts that so even if you dont , wouldnt change lot for me
Bosporus is not a canal it is a strait like gibraltar, you can't get a passing fee from a natural strait. How could you make such mistake? Other than new canal is totally useless.
The only hole is that the waiting time will be longer and longer and shipping companies would pay to use the canal. Means, you can wait several days in istanbul to pass the bosporus for free or you pay and pass via canal.
@@ac4633 how? Maximum waiting time is 14 hours currently and You can't force anybody to use canal. Each year numbers of passing ship from strait declining, how could you so sure? Have you got a shipping company?
@@Ahmet-yu7jr do you think it is possible to create or build obstacle in the bosforus strait so that large ships can't pass anyway?
@@risingsun8609 The narrowest part of the strait is 680 m , I think it cost too much for that kind of structure just for narrowing and I'm pretty sure there are international law against that. The funny part is the new canal's widest part is 300 m, less than half of the narrowest part of strait. And people claims it is safer passage. An accident could be dissasterious.
Montrö yüzünden ücret alınmıyor. Bu şartla boğazlar Türkiye'nin denetiminde. Yoksa orada boğazlar komisyonu olacaktı. Bayrağı ayrı ve her ülkeden üyenin yönetimde olduğu bir komisyon.
Human greed knows no boundaries irrespective of religion or nationality
Not greed. Traffic in Bosphorus is too much. And turkey can't earn even 1$ from it.
Canal istanbul will boost turkey's economy. Offering jobs and investment
@@newbsidian said the guy in pakistan lmfao sure man
sultan erdoğanın askerleri
Bosphorus Strait and Canal Istanbul are like free RUclips and RUclips premium!
What you want!😂😂😂
This analogy works only if you have ads that goes for hours without a addon or app that blocks them. Ultimately Turkish govt. already gave out a number of scientists that put the number of passings through the Bosporus at 25k/year for a healthy environment and risk free passing of the straits. Which is already half of what is now going through. Therefore, put on some more unskippable ads to your RUclips and some off days for server maintenance, and you're good to go!
Well the free one is going to have major maritime traffic!
DW has long lost its credibility!!!
They try their best to show biased reports
Stolen comment from RealLifeLore channel....
@jaep struiksma my pleasure bro!
Great project! Greetings from Serbia. 🇹🇷🇷🇸
You western media just love the critics of other countries but didn't allow your critics that challenge western imperialistic project
What are you talking about? Western media as you put it is far more critical in it's own countries than others on this type of issue.
@@annoyedaussie3942 yes may be that's true but they pick and choose another country on their western friend or foe
Oh my god STOP ADDING ARABIC MUSIC TO TURKISH VIDEOSSS FFS. YOU DO IT ON POURPOSE I BELIEVE
You...do realize Turkish culture is heavily influenced by Arab culture?
@@bulutuss ottoman empire had no arabic music,influenced mostly by greek and ancient sumers and armenian instruments.Turkish music culture influenced minimal on arabic culture and i myself never heard this kind of music in my life as a turk.
@@narxes Yes we did influenced but not heavily.Our culture is so much similar to balkans or armenians.Because instead of get influenced by the southern arabs,we influenced where we settled;anatolia.Anatolia had a rich culture and we mixed our cultures with them,mostly greek or armenian or ancient sumer and hittites etc. Even our well-known desert baklava is from sumer-mesopatimian origin.And our music influenced may the least from other segments of social life. Greek or armenian influence is so much more in our music culture and arabic is veeery little.I never heard this kind of music in my life as a turk.Yet these kind of news channels tries to make people think like this is the turkish music. And i hate that.
@@bulutuss i mean you say ottoman music is not arabic and you are right,but this is not ottoman music,this is definitely arabic music.That was my point man
@@bulutuss yahu allah allah çok bilmiş gibi durup niye konuşuyosun dostum.Tarih okudum osmanlı müziğiyle arap müziğinin uzaktan yakından alakası yok,türk miletinin en az etkilendiği alandır bu.İkincisi Bu videoda kullanılan def,sistrum gibi çalgılar türk-osmanlı müziğinde yoktur.Darbuka hariç arap müziği enstrümenlarıyla çalınmış bir müzikle osmanlı müziğinin ne alakası olabilir?Hayır niye kabul etmek zor arap taşağı aşığımısın kardeşim bezdirdin be.
The Bosphorus, through which approximately 43,000 ships pass annually, is a natural waterway with a narrowest point of 698 m. The increase in tonnage in ship traffic, the increase in ship sizes as a result of technological developments, and the increase in the number of ships (tankers) carrying fuel and other similar dangerous/toxic substances pose a great pressure and threat on Istanbul.
In the Bosphorus, there are sharp turns, strong currents, and vertically intersecting urban maritime traffic with transit ship traffic that risk waterway transportation. Hundreds of thousands of residents live on both sides of the Bosphorus. The Bosphorus is a place of commerce, life and transit for millions of Istanbulites during the day. The Bosphorus is becoming more dangerous every year in terms of the risks posed by the passing ship traffic. The annual number of ship transits, which was 3-4 thousand 100 years ago, has increased and has reached 45-50 thousand today. Due to the one-way traffic organization implemented to increase navigational safety, the average waiting time in the Bosphorus for large ships is approximately 14.5 for each ship stuck in hold. is the hour. The waiting time can sometimes take 3-4 days or even a week depending on the ship traffic and weather conditions and sometimes an accident or malfunction.
In this framework, it has become mandatory to plan an alternative transit corridor to the Bosphorus. Safe travel for our people will be ensured by preventing the risk of fatal accidents caused by the 90-degree vertical intersection of the ships transiting the city lines, which carry 500 thousand passengers a day, with Kanal Istanbul.
Unfortunately, you could get bad actors who intentionally try to jam up a canal.
@@collinwhites9833 ikr
I stopped watching the moment I heard Arabic music on a video about Turkey.
buhuu wrong music such a grave accident xD
@@bastiananuss1727
If someone doesn’t take the time and research to find Turkish music, then what should I expect on the rest of the video?
Obviously poorly done with minimal effort.
Earth to series movies.. turkey used to write I arabic alphabet before the collapse of the ottoman empire.. they are pretty much the same. Same religion too sooo.. It's ok don't be ashamed about it!
@Enigma Codebreaker europe=indian
@Enigma Codebreaker you indian people
Dw always a good reference
When they are against it. Its good for turkey
exactly.
DW = Israel
lmao
Türkiye über alles
1:14 "... and majority of its people (istanbulies) oppose this project." while @DW shows a hundred people protesting against this project. Grow up! Show some real survey report. Even conducted by some western ngo.
Over 70% of people who actually know about the project are against it. I can tell you that as an Istanbulite.
If Germany have the same opportunity to build something like this they would just build it and everyone would hear for it once when it’s done lol. but here we are talking about Turkey and their own good because we “love” Turkey 😅
Completly wrong. Politicans try to build Highways (for example the A20 in northern germany) but the politicans are not able to complete the Highway because of protesting citizens.
Checkout BER airport to prove you are wrong! lol
What about Stuttgart 21 they do what they want to do
Ever heard of the power line through Bavaria, the progress of which is extremely delayed and disrupted by citizen protests?
Did you notice that nord stream 2 was stopped?
This report is impartial, DW's reputation is rock bottom
Well that‘s typical about german journalism: Interview three people on the street who are against the venture and thus create the feeling that everybody in the country is against the project.
I‘m no friend to the turkish government and not supporting this project at all. I just think that good journalism should be neutral as possible. Not onesided like this.
So you want them to interview the millions of Istanbul inhabitants just so they could be seen as neutral in your eyes?
I work in a tv station until several years ago, usually we interview 20-30 people but only show maximum 5 with majority shown the most with at least 1 opposite view. The rest is filled with expert's view
so accurate
Building a canal through water reservoir is beyond idiotic.
Only 3 % will be gone. The rest will be sealed off better with beton.
@@minzblatt Concrete that can break in an earthquake. The whole area is in a seismic zone.
DW "obvious hypocrisy"
You are contradicting yourself in this video, listen to yourself carefully and you would know. It explains you also can not find strong flaws in this project for Turkey but gains and loss for EU.
What loss for the EU? Romania and Bulgaria are the only EU countries there. If the tax on the channel becomes too much they will just drive down to Greece and ship their stuff from there.
I have only see tens of people in ur report ! Where is the majority of Istanbul residents ?! Did you made an public poll ? Such way you use in your report without evidence regarding salt water 💦 and other concerns confirm that Erdogan was right when he said that Europeans doesn’t like such big project .
Lemme tell you that his entire presence is our nightmare!
DW and Germany have they ever seen any positive act in Turkey all your reports are attacking Turkey even if they do well. This is not fair and not professional
Germans see Turkey as their biggest Rival like all other big European States they fear nothiing more than a strong Turkey, ever more than Russia.
@@Levo_D_Angelo I don't think Germany should be compare with turkey.
Turkey has nothing in front of Germany.
Neither they have economy neither they have a influence like Germany
@@Levo_D_Angelo Lol 😂.
They both are Allies in war. There's nothing sensable in your comment.
And Russia is a threat for nato.(also china)
@@user-jj7yh4vb3j China is threats for only usa not for Europe
@@lightyagami9409 i wrote nato.😑
Do u know that USA is in nato? And attack on one country means attack on all.?
Long live Turkey
Love many many thank you.
Love always.
These are the funniest comments i have seen in a long time
Fr, they are all saying"this video is biased, shame on you!". Someone probably bought some comment bot
If you can't handle to be calm against these comments in here, you would not survive in Turkey LoL xD
What an uninformative video. Where are the Research facts and numbers about environmental impact versus economic advantages?
Ne ekonomik avantajı. Ön cepleri zaten paradan taşanların göt ceplerini de doldurmak istemeleri, sen ben gibi Ali'ye Mehmet'e yarar sağlamaz. Vatandaş çocuğunu besleyemediği için intihar ederken Araplar İstanbul'un keyfini sürecek orada. Hayal kurmayı bırakın, gerçekelere bakın.
@@alp3909 Avrupada heryer Kanal dolu, yani Türkiye yaptigi zamanmi kötü oluyor??
@@alp3909 O kanala verilecek para olası İstanbul depremi için kullanılabilecekken ve ülke bir ton sorunla boğuşurken bu kanalın yapılması birden ülkeyi kalkındıracak sanıyorlar. Ekonomi çöp olmuş, işsizlik diz boyu, gelecek için umutsuzluk var, Marmara denizi resmen ölmüş ama sözde kanal daha önemli. Ek olarak bu kanalın yapılması Möntrö sözleşmesini de çiğneyecek ve dünya barışını da etkileyecek. Amerika Rusya ve Ukrayna arasında olan bitenlere karışmak istese parasını verip karadenize savaş gemisi bile sokabilir. Ülkeyi kalkındırma adı altında Katarlılar için Türkiyenin en güzel ve en çok tarihi değere sahip şehrini ortadan ikiye ayıracaklar ve bunu bu arkadaş destekliyor. Şaka gibi.
@@erhansolhan9564 ya Erhan Bey, yap-işlet-devretin nesini anlamıyorsunuz? Devlet yapmıyor burayı. Özel bir konsorsiyum yapıyor. Devlet para vermiyor. Vermediği paranın nesini aktaracak İstanbul depremine?
Montrö'nün etkileneceğini nereden çıkardınız? Bu salak dw'ye filan mı inanıyorsunuz? Marmara denizi ve Çanakkale boğazı yerinde durmuyor mu? Buralar anlaşmaya dahil değil mi? Rica ederim...
Kalan söyledikleriniz de ya yanlış, ya alakasız, ya saçma. Ama nihayet kanalla ilgili olmadıklarından, istediğiniz gibi düşünebilirsiniz.
The project will be beneficial for only some people who bought the lands that are located at the construction site. This is the missing part of the news. We should look at those people while talking about the project. Short-term economic boost is not mattered after destroying the nature of Istanbul and putting millions of people at the risk of an earthquake. Whereas the short-term economic boost is very controversial for the country's economy.
You can't find any experts who speak in favor of the Canal Project. Besides, Turkey will lose the geopolitical importance gained with the treaty of Montreux. There is no government in Turkey that is capable to solve the economic crises and other problems.
they will probably stop and accuse the west of sabotaging their plans when they realize its not feasible only for them to victimize themselves when the economy hits rock bottom.
It's a canal, not a port. Only the government who benefitted from this
why DW is always so anti erdogan?
Maybe because Erdogan is a dictator in disguise, a delusional adolescente with imperial dreams.
@@TheLastTocharian we will elect erdogan again in 2023
@@knowhere9121
He won all elections in turkey and is the most popular politician in turkey
Pkk and Atheists dont Support him
@@knowhere9121
Ağla peach
@@knowhere9121
Yenmişde yenmiş
Yenmişde yenmiş
Hadi s git
When there were 2 Suez canals, wouldn't it be a welcome thing for all the shipping companies ?
And especially a few weeks ago ?
And the Bosporus is on itself a historically rich natural canal and the heart of Istanbul.
With every passing ship, there are a lot of dangers to the city and the historical objects inside it.
When there would be a second canal, the Bosporus could breathe the first time.
It is more than understandable that Istanbul needs its 2nd canal.
No you little sheep
Usual Biased reporting by DW
Hence if DW says it’s bad for Turkey it means it is an excellent project for Turkey
Anything that makes west bark is good for Turkey congratulations and goodluck from Qatar
We Turkish people are rejecting your wishes and asking you to stop interfering in our country's internal affairs.
@@danijelamali8467 your name isn't even Turkish. So be quiet please.
Qatari ahh remind me something.
Isis
@@danijelamali8467 goddamn it indian come with a real account
@@hke.4475 he is Turkish.
Many Turkish don't like Erdogan.
It's not wrong...it will boost Turkey waterways and I'm sure Russia Or Ukraine must be backing this
Anything that makes west bark is good for Turkey ....
Literally
👍😄
Lol you are right. When Istanbul Airport was built, DW was crying again lol :D
@@idkmyname7211 because of covid 19 pendemic.
Agree. They too scared
But why building it? What's wrong with the Bosporus? Why a second strait?
It’s like free account and
premium account! 😂
Turkey isn't allowed to monetize it, basically they can limit the passage in the Bosporus for safety reasons so that transits are forced to happen mostly through the canal.
because they have 53.000 ships going trough it, while suez for example only has 15.000 and it goes trough a mayor city which is a risk.
Mind your own business 😂 it's not your country
$
Actually i think it was little bit yellow journalism from dw
Dw slowly turning into left leaning media from center media
Once the new paid canal opens, why would ships choose the paid canal over the free one nearby? I guess I'm missing something?
Well, the other strait is indeed getting too congested, slow, dangerous and polluting. Plus, trade is increasing.
@@mardbenzmura1446 None of what you said is correct. Polls of ship captains show that captains will prefer the HUGE one instead of taking a risk with canal. It is too narrow.
@@mardbenzmura1446 bosphorus strait is mostly empty lol (i live close to it)
Today 45.000 ships go trough Bosporus. Pay nopfing nu do wait at least 3 days and does lose 50.000 dollar because they wait.
When the Canal is build only 25000 ships Will be allowed to pass Bosporus... The others need to wait An week or pay 50.000 dollar and use the Kanal.
@@mardbenzmura1446 no, it js not. The number of ships passing throught bosphorus decreases every year.
Gollum made this project for his son-in-law,'s business empire
@Antime Canal Istanbul might be a good thing but i suppose that you're not really aware what this governments doing to Turkey for a long time. They make mega-projects likes canal, then they spend like 2x-3x the money needed to build these stuff so they can get their own profit. So they actually rob turkish citizens. I won't get into it deeper in a youtube comment but i have never seen an educated man or woman that is pro-canal. At least with AKP.
@Antime For example, ex-prime minister Binali has a worth of 26 billion dollars :D How do you think this guy made this money? By his salary??
@Antime You are delusional
@Antime "don't believe in anything you hear from the opposition" - most naive thing I've heard in a while. Do you think the government would tell you about their mistakes and corruption in their own media? Get your facts from different sources and don't believe just one channel, especially if it's financed by your government. Or you will end up brainwashed.
@TK and you need to see how the turkish economy was going to the best until 2016 , I think you are the one who should make a studies
Every project has some problems I agree with you but that water way help Turkish people for more job opportunity 🌲 was also cut in Panama canal but without infrastructure projects no country grow
Panama Canal splited central America and cut down transportion time in have this will not cute anything aspecialy when the port of triest will connect to the danube by railway.
Why would he want to build that? Oh, money! More money, more money! The people build it, private interests( Erdogan?) will run it and make all the money.
Why all countries makes billions from their canals..and turkey not making any?
Other countries do this but it's a problem everytime turkey does anything 😂😂😂 usa literlly use a whole country as a canal😭😭
Well don’t use it so you don’t have to pay for it then, it’s just that easy. Take another route.
What’s your problem. Why is it such a concern?
Erdogan is constantly collecting taxes from us. And when we speak our mind, we are taken into custody
The thing is yeah it is about money but it is not about passing fees some fellows bought lands nearby of new channel so theye planning to make money from this lands
Love my Turkish Brothers and Sisters 🇸🇴🇹🇷 keep the good work and Make Turkey and Islam Proud.
inshaAllah you guys will make it. no matter what the western media says about you. keep it up
We are not any brothers nor sisters. Turkey is secular country and islam is not welcome here.
@@معاذالسعداوي-ك4ث By the way turkey is the puppet of china only.
@@danijelamali8467 lol....you are from Croatia not even turk
this is sacrifice by Turkish people for future Turkish generation.... So many countries are obstructing means you are on a right path... Also imagine ship containing Ammonium Nitrate caught fire in Bosporus that like of the coast of Sri Lanka or Beirut..
Istanbul would not be spared if a ship explodes in the new canal. yes, damage would be less. but you'll still need to change your windows.
Already Turkey has a right to inspect each ship which carries dangerous explosion materials. There are also some safety precautions on this issue. Each accident can be prevented beforehand why the accident is such a science.
@@volkanerkan3910 ah yes but they know they have a corruption problem and those who need to bribe also are the ones putting others in danger. So that option goes out the window.
@@rusu989 we are aware of the real target 👍
You know that when Western main stream media is reporting against development you are doing something good.
German media, specifically. Germany is heavily involved in international trade, and much of that trade passes through the Turkish Straits, so of course, they aren't going to appreciate new tolls. The potential military application of this project could actually be beneficial to NATO as a whole, but Germany has shown how willing it is to disregard the interests of its allies.
1:13 the reporter said, "and the majority of Istanbul’s citizens are against it", how a small organized group politically motivated seems to you as a majority of Istanbul’s citizens? Neutral journalism Should be the standard DW. U may not like Erdogan but report neutrally as It's the main Base of Journalism.
no its true im turkish and i know that they dont want it
@@user-zc8zb5zr8h Really why is it happening though.Isnt this putting Istanbul in a more vulnerable position
Media = Weapons of Mass Deception
According to polls conducted they don't want it, so what are you talking about?
@@sharequsman596 it is bad for nature AND the economy in turkey is already bad because of erdogan but he keeps investing in useless projects. there was no need for a canal! trust me, if you lived in turkey you would say something else. you only see the cover of the book but not whats inside of it…
He's gonna block DW soon
DW was against the new Istanbul airport also 😅😂😂 . Imagine German news stopped anything and cares about Turkey s projects 😅 . If you care about Turkey stop supporting pkk ;)
İstanbul airport is a big waste and this is also like that.
@@asdjkl4502 Yea yea 😂
Ahaha again German media and again a critic about one of big projects in Turkey. Why Germans so interested in this? Also try to find canal project supporters too, not just opposites. What kind of journalism you do!!!
Lmao exactly what trt news but apparently they are the best journalists
What a nightmare. Reform the Montreal Treaty instead.
Goodness, there is nothing more important than potable drinking water and good agricultural land.
How dangerous are these "Strong men".
Turkey didn't want to sign the UN convention on the law of the Sea. They didn't want to renegotiate with the international community.
@@FOLIPE are you Turk?if you aren't you don't know anything about Turks
I agree. We should always trust news about turkey from a germany government tv channel.
Ok then ask the turkish people? I can tell personally, no on like this
@Dogu Tozlu And as a Turk i firmly believe if a western owned media is bashing it then it's definitely a great project, period
@@meretricioussimp7759 no one? Did you eat your brain with cheese and bread my friend? Please use your common sense
@@ThisandThatj What kinda scale is this?So every western journalist makes news just because they are enemy of Turkey?Oh no wonder you blaming every problem in Turkey as doings of " DIJJ güçler".Take that period and buy yourself a brain ok?Yeah I'm sure goverment sided journalist definitely thinking benefit of Turkey not their cut.Just like Presidental election you are deciding just base on your fanatism.THİS İS A PROJECT BENEFİT NOONE BUT AKP AND CONTRACTİON COMPANİES.
Since most Turkish journalists who aren’t in jail work from Berlin, this is a wise decision.
Wow, every aging politician has it's own megalomaniac plan. This reminds me of a plan here in Czech republic. Our president has a vision of cutting a canal through Moravia which would connect rivers Danube, Oder and Elbe. Nobody needs it, it is a disaster from an environmental point of view and economic benefits are overestimated at best. At the same time we are in dispute with Poland over their mining operation that is most likely draining water from the border region. I am sure Erdogan would not risk water supply for Istanbul over a dream project. Surely it is not about his ego and him trying to be bigger than Ataturk.
People do need to examine each mega project on it's own merits.
These defending protestors are the real heroes of turkey.
@Eden Garcia fuertes we are just trying to save the nature and u are saying that we are BRAINWASHED?!?
Absolutely.
@@asyasaveralph6789 " we are just trying to save the nature " please stop lying. act real. show your colors
@@asyasaveralph6789 what nature? A lake and few hills? LMAO nice try bot
@@based9 Of course, it would be foolish to expect you to understand the impact of the project on the nature, as you just dismissed the entire local nature as "a lake and a few hills". You're a kid after all. Your mental capacity has not matured yet. But don't worry, you'll soon understand how pointless of a project this is. Open your eyes and see the truth, kid. You've got a long life ahead of you.
as a turkish person, I am opposite it like many more
I mean it effectively removes influence from people already in Istanbul and diverts it to those who own the land around the canal being built, who are all people in Erdogan inner circle.
@Enigma Codebreaker kick Erdogan out. That's the real salvation
@Enigma Codebreaker Our religion is not your business you indian....
@Enigma Codebreaker still better than worship cow and stone....
Think positive journalist,be aware from yellow journalism
What is yellow journalism?
I don't understand?
@@RealCherry8085 amazing lady
Welldone Turkey. This will be the Future of Turkey.
pakistani boy go away
@@kayacenk4164 why not u?
A very exotic intro 🙄🙄🙄... The seuz canal also done the same, but there is not a single egyptian that say it was a bad project 😒😒
They are not same incidents. Canal is useless
The Suez canal is 200 years old. Why would they complain about it now?
@@fjellyo3261 exactly, and after 20 years of now, no turk will be opposing the canal... We must learn from the other people experiences.
@@anonymusgnc8572 it is not useless... Each day of waiting costs the avarage tradeship about 3000 dollars... So if a tradeship waited 3 or 4 days it will lose about 10,000 dollars... Which means that any fee less than 10,000 dollars will be financially beneficial for the the avarage tradeships ( the bigger the ship, the more costly waiting becomes, so most small ships will keep using the Bosporus, while big noisy traderships will go to the new canal)
@@مالكالقطيف well 200 years ago most Egyptians probably didn't even know about this project. It's important do look out, if mega projects are done properly.