OK Dumbledore is Gryffindor's Heir.. Kowolski is Hufflepuff's.. Voldemort is Slytherin.. WHERE IS OUR RAVENCLAW??? ... (unless... is it.. pretty obvious? (It cant be (right? (no... ))))
Could McGonagall be an heir of Ravenclaw? (Quick refresher: Helena is Rowena Ravenclaw's only known child. She moved to Scotland after fleeing Hogwarts with the diadem only to be hunted and killed years later by the baron who was sent to retrieve her. He got mad when she didn't want to marry him, he kills her, and then guilty, so he kills himself) It takes a couple leaps but as y'all said, Rowena's family history is kinda missing. I don't think this is because Helena didn't have kids but that she would keep her life private and because she died before anyone knew. She hid the Diadem while she was alive, in an Albanian forest and I doubt that was because she didn't know a way to defend things magically or have an heir to pass it to. I suspect this is because Helena knew she would be hunted and that magic would only make finding her/it easier. On top of that, any heirs she left would have little chance with a target that big. (Sidebar: If Helena wasn't a ghost, the diadem would likely never be found. Also, Tom Riddle hiding it in the room of hidden things because he thought he was the only one clever enough to have found it is wildly dumb. Who hid all the other things Tom???? Terrible wedding planner) The first big issue is that McGonagall isn't a Ravenclaw but I think this actually helps her. McGonagall is one of the two true Hatstalls we know of and both of them were because the person's value structure was different than their ambitions. (Pettigrew valued courage but was more cunning and McGonagall believed in bravery and conviction but was brilliant beyond her years) I think this wasn't only because she is so wise but because she is the Ravenclaw heir. Ambitious Slytherins are only made stronger by the rivals they form. A Hufflepuff's loyalty only grows when their friends remain true. Ravenclaw's questions are answered when surrounded by scholars. And a Gryffindor's bravery is forged when they rally together. If you're right about Kowolski, I think he would have been a Hatstall too. The hat has two usually parallel priorities when sorting. It puts you where you'll strive and where your values are reflected. McGonagall might have been equally as strong if she had more scholars at her side but I think the hat eventually realized McGonagall would be driven further with people to protect and a cause to rally behind. (To our knowledge Hatstalls have a lot to do with the wishes of the person being sorted. Hermione, Neville, and Harry are the three longest sortings I can think of and we know that the decision was largely to do with their desired house. As far as why I think they're blood-related, largely because of her intelligence but also because what little we know little about the McGonagall family tree lines up perfectly with the Ravenclaw tree. We only know that one side of the McGonagall family is likely pure-blooded, the other side is muggles and both sides are Scottish. Helena ran from Hogwarts with the Diadem and hid in Scotland for presumably years if not decades. She ran to Scotland while still in school but in most depictions, she is at the youngest in her twenties, when she became the Grey Lady. That leaves enough of a gap to start a family. (Likely with a muggle. Not because we know Rowena's position on muggles but just if she did that would be most likely) When she is murdered by the baron, all chances of that family being on any wizard records are dashed. Now the only big gap I have is which side is the Ravenclaw side and there's a problem. I don't know. Both are plausible. A powerful witch mom dying at the start of the 11th century with one of the biggest family names in existence. I wouldn't be deeply shocked if her line were powerful and eventually became blood purists who have no one to point to at one of the most crucial times for blood purists. They likely didn't know who that line came from. On the other hand, Helena likely married a muggle man and in a time in her life where she would likely avoid magic. It wouldn't be terribly shocking if their line either didn't realize they were magic for most of it or had some generations of squibs. Almost certainly some would be magical but we don't really know when Hogwarts letters were sent to children by sensing magic potential. Along with that, this potential assumes the Ravenclaw line is in many ways accepting. An Obscurus wouldn't really be an issue. (One last problem: Why didn't Helena ever say she had a kid as a ghost? I don't know but she also didn't tell people about the Horcrux but she knew about it and who Tom Riddle was. Also, the lore surrounding ghosts is weird. [I wouldn't be upset if you think Luna is the heir. I just think this lines up better personally. [Sorry for how long this is. I don't really care too deeply if this gets likes but they make it more likely the SuperCarlinBrothers will see this. If you want to hear their thoughts make it more likely.
Does it though? It could also be just to notify Harry and gang about the significance of the sword and maybe get it to them, if that would have worked.
Though Scrimgeour claims he had no right to do so and that the sword belonged to the public/Hogwarts - of course possible explenations are general unawareness of the lineage or the fact that Harry, in turn, is not related to Dumbledore causing the sword as an important historical artifact only then in absence of a natural heir to revert to/be claimed by the state (though in that case it would have been easier for Dumbledore to bequeath the sword to Aberforth for safe keeping?); or Scrimgeour lying for whatever reason. And anyway, putting it on the will when it might have been obvious in no way would the ministry allow it to pass to Harry and with the sword having vanished at that point already (plannedly?) it was more of a shoutout to Harry that the sword is a crucial part of his quest, whether Dumbledore was a Gryffindor by blood or not.
"Sirius Black killed thirteen people!" "No, it wasn't me it was Peter Pettigrew" "How could it be him? He's dead, you killed him" ✨ Sirius Black was not The Impostor ✨
I really like this. Personally, I'm thinking that somewhere between Godric and Albus one of the heirs, probably female, decided that she didn't want to lose the Gryffindor name and courageously asked her fiance Mr Dumble if they could combine their names into Dumbledore, instead of her just taking his name. Her courage won him over and he agreed. They became the first Dumbledores!
@@iambadatnamingthings3547 The man would be part of the decision though, no? He is taking part in the ceremony, 50/50, with her, and would be sharing his name or part/none of. If you don't ask your "to be husband" if he would consent in you taking part of his name, it would make you appear selfish.
Known only by a few, but despite Griffyndor's openmindedness for muggleborn wizards, they were pretty selective and rather elitist when it came to who they arrange marrigies with. It must've always been a dor/dore/door. That's how the young heir, Lady Gryffindor joined the Dumbledore family.
@@iambadatnamingthings3547 You do realize that after last names became commonplace, it was a part of status for their bloodline to continue? What is more, it's not like they had tests that easily proved their lineage, it was almost entirely in the last name. What is more, since the man always carried it, and the wife bore it to symbolize a conjoining of families, it wasn't just done because "Men are Superior". So finally, it is through bravery, because majority of the world would look at this as neither passing down lineage, nor symbolizing the conjoining of families (as in the typical ritual, I understand that mixing the name makes sense as a mixing of the families literally, but that isn't how it was seen traditionally.) My final point is that we are talking about Wizarding families. To the purebloods it makes absolute sense that they wouldn't want the name lost, and we are talking about the potential descendants of Godric who was all for the freedom of magic to anyone that had shown a connection to it, which could be why they so willingly combined the names. All I'm saying is you can pull this notion of "Women Opression" as if she was really undignified by having to ask, but for someone of that time period that would be such a foreign ideal. It just wouldn't make sense.
sociologists prove that bearded people dont have long term relationships. beardless ones tend to have long term ones ... hence more chance of having kids.
I personally like the idea that the Weasleys are the heirs of Gryffindor. It's an unusual coincidence that they all end up there, we know they come from old pureblood lines, and they even have the red hair to match!
@@JuanMataCFC but that doesnt matter because we know that all weasley kids and parents were in gryffindor but when you look back a the family tree one of there ancestors was a black which means that they have slytherin ancestors which in turn shuts the theory of house related heirs.
Actually, everyone in the European Harry Potter universe is a direct descendant of Gryffindor - in fact ANY EUROPEAN is of direct descent of another European who lived 1000 years or more before now. Let me explain: On a basic family tree, as you go up, you multiply each side by 2 - 2 parents, 4 grandparents, 8 great-grandparents, so on. As you keep on going back the number will continue to grow exponentially, until after less than 30 generations, you get to an unreasonably huge number, far more than the population at the time. This means two things; many people are on the same family tree more than once, and there are in general many people in the tree. Additionally, a 2013 genetic survey conducted with 2000 individuals spread from Ireland to Turkey found that each and every single person tested of whom DNA they'd tested could be traced back to the same common ancestors who lived 1000 years ago. There are a bunch of other mathematical concepts that I don't understand which prove the same thing, but at the end of the day, it's safe to say that there is a direct ancestral relation between pretty much everyone in the European Harry Potter universe, considering they are all from the same cultural background.
Well that is at least for lines that never died out entirely but to be fair for a line to die out it usually has to do so fairly quickly for the same reason. Because there are a growing number of people involved with each generation the chance of them all dying childless drops. It is less likely that a single individual survives and has children than it is that at least one of their children do which is still less than any one of their children surviving etc. In general a lot more people have to die for a bloodline to go extinct the more time that passes.
It's not that everyone is descended from everyone, it's that certain family lines, like Gengis Khan are particularly fecundi. There are about a dozen mothers up to around 50,000 years ago most people inherited their mitochondrial DNA from.
so I did the math… and 1) you 2) 2 parents 3) 4 grandparents 4) 8 great grandparents 5) 18 great great grandparents 6) 32 great great great grandparents 7) 64 great great great great grandparents 8) 128 great great great great great grandparents 9) 256 great great great great great great grandparents 10) 512 great great great great great great great grandparents 11) 1024 great great great great great great great great grandparents 12) 2048 great great great great great great great great great grandparents 13) 4096 great great great great great great great great great great grandparents 14) 8192 great great great great great great great great great great great grandparents 15) 16384 great great great great great great great great great great great great grandparents 16) 32768 great great great great great great great great great great great great great grandparents 17) 65536 14x great grandparents 18) 131,072 15x great grandparents 19) 262,144 16x great grandparents 20) 524,288 17x great grandparents 21) 1,048,576 18x great grandparents 22) 2,097,152 19x great grandparents 23) 4,194,304 20x great grandparents 24) 8,388,608 21x great grandparents 25) 16,777,216 22x great grandparents 26) 33,554,432 23x great grandparents 27) 67,108,864 24x great grandparents 28) 134,217,728 25x great grandparents 29) 268,435,456 26x great grandparents 30) 536,870,912 27x great grandparents 536.9 million people english population 1000 years ago 1,250,000…
The sword will present itself to any worthy Gryffindor. It doesn't matter who they are or who they are related to. Fawkes the pheonix comes to Harry because he stayed loyal to Dumbledore in the 2nd book and movie.
Neville did not show loyalty to Dumbledore. The man was dead and buried at that point. Harry showed loyalty to Dumbledore and Fawkes was able to bring him the hat. Valor is what reveals the sword to a true Griffindor.
@@yawninglion1677 Though the Weasleys' might be the Gryffindor heir beyond that, if you also include that they all have Red Hair like Godric Gryffindor and remembering that Mrs. Weasleys' brothers fought so well & hard that it took 5 Death Eaters to defeat them and Godric was known to be an extremely great Duelist himself.
All good teachers know what their kids are into. It's not trying to be 'hip'--I'm a teacher myself, and kids trust you more when you speak their language.
My advisor saw us playing among us and got mad but then we explained that we were playing a community game that builds friendship. We even convinced her to get it! I hope she doesn’t play it and see the neck snapping.
Hey I'm in Pennsylvania why didn't I find the sword :( if a Slytherin could find it fittingly a Hufflepuff should've found it. I mean. It's what we do.
Bruh imagine there’s a tragic backstory of Slytherien losing his entire family to anti-wizard people and the only thing he had left was his locket. He goes to stay with his family’s friends the hufflepuffs who give him a bed and a place to stay until the anti-wizards track him there and burn down the house where Slytherien leaves with their only kid, a young girl named Helga who is obsessed with a cup for some odd reason. Right at the final confrontation there’s no escape as he and Helga are backed into a corner. The man raises how sword and prepares to cut them down, until there’s a clash as a young Godric comes to the aid of people who he doesn’t even know as wizards but he just sees as people in need. Also throughout the season we work in Ravenclaw somehow
It's weird to me that a big theme of the books is that people put way too stock into bloodlines, and yet the fandom is constantly wondering about who is a descendant of which famous witch/wizard. What happened to, "it's our choices that make us who we are"?
I think part of it is because the books contradict themselves. Harry’s, and Voldemort’s bloodlines end up mattering a *lot*. Despite how Harry is supposed to represent the idea that where you come from doesn’t matter at all.
@@karabelle617 Harry sn't special because of his Peverel blood, though. The fact that he has the Cloak matters to the story, but it's his big heart, leadership and tremendous selflessness that makes the difference. The fact that Voldemortalso has Peverall ancestry only reinforces the theme of personal choice.
@@colinvandenberg3446 I find that it takes away the theme of Bloodlines not mattering. Our Hero wasn't someone with an unknown bloodline, like Neville or someone without one like hermione (who is often quoted as the reason they don't matter). Our hero is the sole known heir to the peveral brothers, and therefore the sole known heir to the deathly hallows. But even more recently from a timeline perspective, his money comes from one of his ancesters who made a potion and became rich. The only reason harry never wants for money unlike Ron is because of his bloodline. additionally it's heavily implied that Voldemort made harry his equal partially because harry was half-blood. One could say "well he still became an amazing person and that's the point" but I think its a cop out that harry is at an advantage in half the story over Voldemort. The same Voldemort who was effectively disowned by his family due to his no-mag father. Whose bloodline was full of inbreeding and other issues to the point that it just fell apart. The same Voldemort who had nothing, came from nothing. Voldemort had a sucky bloodline, and he was sucky. Harry had a very different story, which a family who cared and loved for him, even if they died early. Which one of these people turned out "good?" And which one of these turned out "bad"?. Who had a lineup of adults who loved their parents and ready to help them? And who had none of that? I'm not saying the intention wasn't to focus on choices mattering more than blood. But akin to how The Creator "Accidently" made a pro slavery joke in the form of the house elves' and Hermione's attempts to free them, once you look at it beyond what is told to you... there is some iffiness.
@@karabelle617 Yes, characters put a lot of stock in bloodlines, and the fact that Harry is a half-blood is important to his character. My point is that as strong as the theme of bloodlines is in the books is equally prescient the theme that choices define the characters more than their lineage. James Poter had the same kind of exceptional lineage as Marvolo Gaunt, but he and his family judged people by their actions instead of their blood status. It's no accident James lived in a mansion while the Gaunts lived in a shack. There's also the Malfoys and Weasleys, who were both pure-blood families but while one household was held together by love the other was governed by hate.
I think Dumbledor could have easily “fulfilled the requirements” to wield the sword by making it back to Hogwarts and up to his office after putting the cursed ring on in the gaunt’s shack.
@@MaryAlx it May be that way in the movie but in the book. He tells Harry that when he found it he tried to use it to see his parents and his sister . He says “it didn’t occur to me that it was now a horcrux, that it was sure to carry a curse”
@@taberquigley I know what you are referring to, but in Snape's memories, he is asking Dumbledore if he thought that by breaking the ring he would also break the curse. Dumbledore says that it was something like that. That is why I think that he first used the sword on the ring, and then tried to use it to see his family.
@@MaryAlx If he is using the sword to break the curse then he has already put on the ring otherwise there is no curse to break. There is no difference in how events played out in the books and the movies (at least in this case)
When I first read the books , my headcanon was that Gryffindor was the Sorting Hat Consciousness. That's why he was a good judge of character, and that's why the Sword of Gryffindor would always come out. I thought because he was inside the Hat, he couldn't have any kids.
GET INSPIRED: ruclips.net/video/8gHwP0UgaDA/видео.html Seriously, i have something to say, so Listen! We, as a community, need to Tweet towards J.K.Rowling that she should allow the Copyright for Harry Potter to be losened a bit. Cause we need some Sort of Reboot, as almost all books are Lost in Adaptation. The movies just do not represent the franchise right; evidend by Dobby alone. If you know what i mean... And even if we wouldnt need a reboot, the creativity of the fans is still limited too much, if you get what i mean! Like it is, no one can give us what we need and/or want: A lot people want a Series about the 4 Founders! A lot understand how lost in Adaptation all the books are and want all the Movies remade, maybe as a Cartoon, maybe not. And lastly, a lot of people love the idea of a ‚All generation at once’-Cartoon, as the AMV above shows. Isnt it epic? These 3 things should ALL come to fruition, in my opinion. Not to mention at least 1!! Currently, the franchise is limited too much... Fans should be allowed to make Animations about Hogwarts and all ist generations and Magical secrets. ...If you agree the creativity is restrained too harshly, tweet to Rowling! And also discuss! And yeah, i know Rowling gets Tweets about a whole other subject nowadays, but lets get away from that for a second, to help the Harry Potter Franchise, ok?!
@@ishitaasen3733 he said griffindor not Dumbledore... Also Dumbledore only hired them because of the curse of that position because he knew they wouldn't last more than 1 year and also because no one else wanted the job because they all knew about the curse and it was getting harder for him to find a teacher
As a medieval enthusiast, I’ve always found it hilarious how Hogwarts was supposedly built during the Anglo-Saxon era, but has enormous gothic architecture etc. In the 990’s A.D, you’d be lucky to find a castle with a keep bigger than a modern large suburban house!
they had time turners so they could go and checkout the future architecture, but the muggles couldn't see the castle so it didn't influence the fashion in their time, it's all clear :)
It’s known that the castle was updated constantly as the years went on so it’s not intended that it looked the way it does now when it was first built.
Hang on, didn't Dumbledore explain this already? IIRC he said that nothing but the fact that Harry showed him true loyalty in the chamber of secrets could have summoned Fawkes.
I feel like since there’s always new people getting on the internet for the first time, there’s always some trend/slang term being claimed by the new generation even though most of the time it’s recycled sometimes from like 3 years ago lol
@@frostyskeletons8950 Yes yes yes it's especially annoying because I'm in one of the younger generation and people will claim things that existed before but they acte like it didn't
kind of true cause theres only at least 50 families to chose from, and considering most of them are just branches of others, at the time of the founders, there was at most 10 branches to chose from if you want to marry, so.... whole wizarding world is a descendent beside the muggleborns, issue is you need a worthy heir, so not the whole wizarding world can. however not true for the muggle world
@@AnComZharptitza You are right to point out that common ancestry seems much more likely within the wizarding world. But I do like the idea that even muggles might be more likely to be related to the Hogwarts founders than we would expect. The idea that anyone of European descent alive today is in some way related to Charlemagne (or any other European around 1000 AD, for that matter) is basically a numbers game, and it may be an oversimplification, but genetic evidence seems to at least suggest that any two Europeans alive today might have a large number of common ancestors when you go back 1000 years. If you could apply the same to the wizarding world, "pure blood" fanaticism would appear rather pointless... www.nature.com/news/most-europeans-share-recent-ancestors-1.12950
I also thought that Harry and Neville were distant cousins and descendants of Gryffindor. Albus said it himself; “only a true Gryffindor could have pulled that out of the hat.”
One year later and I’m almost done paying off my upstart loan. Literally a miracle that they sponsored you and I took my chance. No other bank would take a second look at me due to my age.
I don’t believe animagi can take the form of magical creatures. That said, I really like this idea. I would argue that instead, Godric transfigured himself into a phoenix. It is incredibly dangerous for a witch/wizard to transfigure themself into an animal form. This is because when they do so, their mind also takes on the properties of that animal. So if Godric were to transfigure himself into a phoenix, he would have the brain of a phoenix and it would be irreversible. My head-canon is that he was probably close to death and transfigured himself as a final act, and as a phoenix he was immortal. Also, if the theory that Dumbledore is a Gryffindor is true (which I feel that it is) then the idea that Fawks is Godric adds a whole new layer to the “a phoenix will always come to a Dumbledore in need” thing. If Fawks is Godric, and the Dumbledore are just descendants of Gryffindor, than the phoenix that comes to Dumbledores is just Godric helping his heirs in phoenix form.
To quote Sir Terry pratchet: "It's a Sword. It's not suppose to be safe." And I don't think the sword has a safety feature that prevents people from using it.
It's a weapon though, and weapons tend to have features to prevent people from using them. Slytherin's wand is a great example of that. Its allegiance was with the bloodline, and it even had a specific spell/password that disabled it completely, which ended up rendering it permanently useless after Gormlaith Gaunt used it and died without passing on the secret. That wand has been buried in Ilvermorny's garden, dying with that branch of the Slytherin bloodline, further proving that the relics of the Founders stay in their respective families.
@@DeeSnow97 But we already know "the Wand chooses the Wizard", so we already know that wands have some intelligence of their own. However, the sword is not a wand, thus we can't expect it to act like a wand. Plus, we don't have any examples of relics like Hufflepuff's cup, Slytherin's locket, or Ravenclaw's Diadem being able to think for themselves. Lastly, we know that the sword was owned by people other than Gryphondor. i.e. Goblins.
I would say that with magic involved, there's another possibility that would be almost both. The sword takes on that which makes it stronger. So, maybe anyone can use the sword as a standard sword, but only a true gryffindor or master of the sword (whichever you would like to say) can bring out those aspects, and have it be a strong weapon. Like with the elder wand, working for Voldemort, but not working extremely well. The other thing is that there is clear evidence the sword has a level of the intelligence that wands do. Otherwise, how would it appear to true gryffindors in need?
@@cliffritch7304 We also need to consider that the sword "Always appears to a worthy Griffondor" through the sorting hat. The sorting hat is known to be intelligent and able to see into the minds of people. So is being a "True Griffindor" decided by the hat or the sword?
The second object Dumbledore left to Harry was the Sword of Gryffindor, but Scrimgeour refused to give it to him, saying it was a historical artifact and not Dumbledore’s. So, maybe he wanted Harry to get the sword as an heir pice and not to destroy the deadly hallows since he knew the MM would not give the sword to Harry.
"Only to pull out the sword .. oh god I hit something..." *said as sparks fall* Me: 'Tis barely a scratch ... *SCB, I quite literally shot soda through my nose on this, as I had just taken a drink ... and this made me laugh at the same time.*
He may not have been married, though, and was just "sowing his wild oats". Note that none of the present-day teachers at Hogwarts are married. I've long wondered why not.
@@PhilBagels strange detail. Maybe it's just that it would be a strenuous relationship considering the teachers are at school for 10 months of the year.
@@The_Jovian In the real world, there are plenty of boarding schools where some of the teachers are married. A teacher's spouse could easily live in the castle - there's plenty of room. Or in Hogsmeade village, where it's not that difficult for married couples to get together.
He just did that so Harry/Hermione knew the sword was useful for something, destroying horcruxes. Also there was a big thing that it wasn’t his property to give away, hence Harry not getting it.
Possible candidate for heir of Ravenclaw: Quirrell. -He met Voldemort in the forest in Albania, which is where Helena hid the diadem - maybe he was looking for it? -He was tempted by Voldemort and what he could offer, much like Helena was tempted by the diadem -The diadem is worn on the head, and Quirrell had Voldemort on the back of his head
"Godric is described as being the most outspoken of accepting muggle borns into Hogwarts." Um, this is false. Hufflepuff actually has that distinction. Godric merely defended her point when Slytherin tried to make it an ultimatum.
@Peri Uluırmak It's the trait of gryffindor and hufflepuff but wormtail, a gryffindor, betrayed his friends so hufflepuff is more worthy to say 'loyal'.
I bet when Godric enchanted the sword to appear to Gryffindors in need that he got a lot of joy knowing the goblins would never be able to hold on to it.
I always thought that Dumbledore was able to use the sword because giving up on the oportunity to see his late parents and sister by destroying the ring was a tremendous act of courage
But Dumbledore *did* try to use it! He told Harry that’s why his hand got messed up and he only had a year to live! Only after that did he have the strength to remove the Resurrection Stone and destroy the ring
Maybe Griffendor was gay like albus.... and he views all his house as his kids and thats why the sword goes to any griffendor unlike the other house items that stay in the family
So building on this, maybe he was estranged from his biological family due to his sexuality, and even if he had blood relatives he willed all his belongings to Hogwarts, so the school is the only heir.
I thought maybe the Weasleys would be somehow the misfit heirs of Gryffindor, which is a why they are so well known in the magical community, yet so made fun of for being so poor. They all make it it to Gryffindor house, easily. etc etc
Also they have a crazy big house, their family is obessed with herilooms as if they know they are missing a gigantic one, like the Sword of gryffindor??
Chamber of secrets deleted scene: Harry feels the hat is heavier he reaches inside and he takes out a... cup... Tom: is that, Hufflepuff's cup? Harry still in shock gets killed by the basilisk, ginny dies and tom becomes a full human.
My personal headcanon is that Godric is actually the father of Helena Ravenclaw after falling in love with Rowena, he could still have modern descendants if Helena had kids before being killed by the Bloody Baron
Also also actually actually, isn’t Harry distantly related to Salazar Slytherin??? Like he is related to Ignotus Peverell, one of the three brothers. He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named is the descendant of the second brother, Cadmus Peverell. You-Know-Who is also a descendant of Salazar Slytherin. Sooooo you do the math. Wait that makes sense right? They should really pay more attention to the math budget. Comment your thoughts!
One brother died the night his wand was stolen, the other brother died after using the stone. Wouldn't only the one harry was related to have descendants? The cloak got passed on in the surviving line...
I think the phoenix metaphors are more literal. I think Albus Dumbledore is a literal reincarnation of Gryffondor. He probably doesnt know it and it probably has nothing to do with the Dumbledore family tree. Gryffondor has no heirs because he himself is born again whenever he dies. Maybe part of the magic used makes him sterile and cant retaining old memories, but will undeniably always be the same person
"How could Godric not have kids with that beard?" While discussing Albus in the same breath..maybe Godric was also gay with Slytherin? But I believe Fawkes was Godric. Like a guiding angel for his descendants. Can see when it was Fawkes who brings the hat and sword to Harry in the chamber. Especially in your video if you say Salazar is the basilisk and Fawkes fights it.come to think of it, harry could be a descendant as well, as Fawkes comes to his aid.... Dumbledore answers how Harry could pull out the sword, but not why Fawkes came to his aid.
The reason why he was able to use the sword was because it was where it always belong when it’s not being used in Godrich Gryffindor‘s old room or “his secret room”
I think that's definitely up for debate, considering that Fawkes is Dumbledore's constant phoenix. It's hard to say the level of control or lack thereof the Dumbledores have over their phoenix companions. Dumbledore was also technically in need because of his suspension as headmaster by the school's board of governors. By assisting Harry and preventing the deaths of more students, Fawkes ensured that Dumbledore could return to Hogwarts and continue his life's work. Additionally, Fawkes knew of Dumbledore's investment in and particular regard towards Harry. I guess it depends on how aware you believe phoenixes are. I imagine they're very wise beyond most creatures (even in the Wizarding world), or you could say that Dumbledore simply ordered Fawkes to help Harry should he ever be absent. Then I imagine Fawkes' magical protective instincts then transferred to Harry. I like to think that a phoenix has wisdom beyond other creatures and has greater perception rather than just acting on the order of its wizard. That seems a little too owl-like for a fantastic beast with the majesty of a phoenix.
i'm currently working on this playlist, "Harry potter | Super Carlin Brothers" And your line about gryffon-door as in the gryffon door knockers was pretty clever. I love this playlist because i'm such a huge fan of harry potter
This is a pretty good theory, but Dumbledore wouldn't have necessarily needed the sword to destroy the ring. We all know Dumbledore had an insane arsenal of magic at his command. Me guess is he probably used that fire spell that got him and Harry out of that terrible lake, maybe even that fire spell that destroyed the diadem. We certainly wouldn't have to be worried that he wouldn't be able to control it the fire like Crabbe (or Goyle ) can never remember who is who. I'm not trying to disprove the theory or anything, I just wanted to point out that Dumbledore would probably have no need of it. Him being an heir is still really cool though!
The fact that fawks came to Harry's aid on multiple occasions, and that Dumbledore tried to leave the sword of Gryffindor to him makes harry in many ways Dumbledore's adopted son. Really wish Fawks had pledged his allegiance to Harry after Dumbledore died. It just seemed so obvious.
Ok, but can we talk about how there was a major missed opportunity for Draco to have some serious Zuko-like character development? Can’t you imagine him helping them because he was on the inside, and knows things? Harry could also have gotten character development out of it in learning to forgive and let go of his hatred of Draco, because we all know he had a serious fixation on Draco for a while.
I have a headcanon where when Dumbledore used to live in Gryffindor Tower as a student, his dormitory would eventually be the same one Harry and Ron would live in.
@@idiot528 I don't think Harry is Slytherin's Heir because Tom embodied the Slytherins more than Harry does. He had magical heritage - not pure but apparently that doesn't matter despite what Malfoy says- he was ruthless and cruel and cunning even before he started school on top of being part of Salazar's bloodline through the Gaunts, which Harry is not, and possessing the Parseltongue which Harry only got from the Horcrux.
I feel like these guys are so underrated. They are so hilarious and make my pea sized understand these theories. Like why can’t YOU be my teacher?! Also they should have like way more subs-
Yeah but here he meant she was the last person to have known the whereabouts of the diadem before Tom tricked her into telling where she hid it and made it into a horcrux not when Harry asked her about it. Just like how Hepzibah was the last to have to cup before Tom killed and stole it from her. All in all he meant the relics always had been with the descendants of the founders.
![Where Does The Sword Of Gryffindor Hide? [Harry Potter Theory]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/oF9f5582PNs/mqdefault.jpg)
![Is Snape Still Alive? [Harry Potter Theory]](/img/1.gif)
OK Dumbledore is Gryffindor's Heir..
Kowolski is Hufflepuff's..
Voldemort is Slytherin..
WHERE IS OUR RAVENCLAW???
...
(unless... is it.. pretty obvious? (It cant be (right? (no... ))))
Ok i literally almost exactly commented this 😂
Isn't it the Gray Lady or are you guys talking about the new generations?
Is it Ben? Also where is Ben??? He wasn't here last week
NEXT PROJECT!!!!!
It’s obviously Gilderoy Lockhart
Could McGonagall be an heir of Ravenclaw?
(Quick refresher: Helena is Rowena Ravenclaw's only known child. She moved to Scotland after fleeing Hogwarts with the diadem only to be hunted and killed years later by the baron who was sent to retrieve her. He got mad when she didn't want to marry him, he kills her, and then guilty, so he kills himself)
It takes a couple leaps but as y'all said, Rowena's family history is kinda missing. I don't think this is because Helena didn't have kids but that she would keep her life private and because she died before anyone knew. She hid the Diadem while she was alive, in an Albanian forest and I doubt that was because she didn't know a way to defend things magically or have an heir to pass it to. I suspect this is because Helena knew she would be hunted and that magic would only make finding her/it easier. On top of that, any heirs she left would have little chance with a target that big.
(Sidebar: If Helena wasn't a ghost, the diadem would likely never be found. Also, Tom Riddle hiding it in the room of hidden things because he thought he was the only one clever enough to have found it is wildly dumb. Who hid all the other things Tom???? Terrible wedding planner)
The first big issue is that McGonagall isn't a Ravenclaw but I think this actually helps her. McGonagall is one of the two true Hatstalls we know of and both of them were because the person's value structure was different than their ambitions. (Pettigrew valued courage but was more cunning and McGonagall believed in bravery and conviction but was brilliant beyond her years) I think this wasn't only because she is so wise but because she is the Ravenclaw heir.
Ambitious Slytherins are only made stronger by the rivals they form. A Hufflepuff's loyalty only grows when their friends remain true. Ravenclaw's questions are answered when surrounded by scholars. And a Gryffindor's bravery is forged when they rally together.
If you're right about Kowolski, I think he would have been a Hatstall too. The hat has two usually parallel priorities when sorting. It puts you where you'll strive and where your values are reflected. McGonagall might have been equally as strong if she had more scholars at her side but I think the hat eventually realized McGonagall would be driven further with people to protect and a cause to rally behind.
(To our knowledge Hatstalls have a lot to do with the wishes of the person being sorted. Hermione, Neville, and Harry are the three longest sortings I can think of and we know that the decision was largely to do with their desired house.
As far as why I think they're blood-related, largely because of her intelligence but also because what little we know little about the McGonagall family tree lines up perfectly with the Ravenclaw tree. We only know that one side of the McGonagall family is likely pure-blooded, the other side is muggles and both sides are Scottish. Helena ran from Hogwarts with the Diadem and hid in Scotland for presumably years if not decades. She ran to Scotland while still in school but in most depictions, she is at the youngest in her twenties, when she became the Grey Lady. That leaves enough of a gap to start a family. (Likely with a muggle. Not because we know Rowena's position on muggles but just if she did that would be most likely) When she is murdered by the baron, all chances of that family being on any wizard records are dashed.
Now the only big gap I have is which side is the Ravenclaw side and there's a problem. I don't know. Both are plausible. A powerful witch mom dying at the start of the 11th century with one of the biggest family names in existence. I wouldn't be deeply shocked if her line were powerful and eventually became blood purists who have no one to point to at one of the most crucial times for blood purists. They likely didn't know who that line came from. On the other hand, Helena likely married a muggle man and in a time in her life where she would likely avoid magic. It wouldn't be terribly shocking if their line either didn't realize they were magic for most of it or had some generations of squibs. Almost certainly some would be magical but we don't really know when Hogwarts letters were sent to children by sensing magic potential. Along with that, this potential assumes the Ravenclaw line is in many ways accepting. An Obscurus wouldn't really be an issue.
(One last problem: Why didn't Helena ever say she had a kid as a ghost? I don't know but she also didn't tell people about the Horcrux but she knew about it and who Tom Riddle was. Also, the lore surrounding ghosts is weird. [I wouldn't be upset if you think Luna is the heir. I just think this lines up better personally.
[Sorry for how long this is. I don't really care too deeply if this gets likes but they make it more likely the SuperCarlinBrothers will see this. If you want to hear their thoughts make it more likely.
+
Very nice
Very nice indeed
Extremely RUBBISH even more RUBBISH than these videos
@@KopKing11 dosen't matter its still RUBBISH
Also, Dumbledore puts the sword in his will, almost like it was a family heirloom to be passed down.
Excellent point! That really lends credence (no pun intended) to this theory!
Does it though? It could also be just to notify Harry and gang about the significance of the sword and maybe get it to them, if that would have worked.
Could’ve been either reason. It’s food for thought.
I think the griffindore magic thing is just a hoax created by dumbledore so harry has a reason to belive he is a true griffindore
Though Scrimgeour claims he had no right to do so and that the sword belonged to the public/Hogwarts - of course possible explenations are general unawareness of the lineage or the fact that Harry, in turn, is not related to Dumbledore causing the sword as an important historical artifact only then in absence of a natural heir to revert to/be claimed by the state (though in that case it would have been easier for Dumbledore to bequeath the sword to Aberforth for safe keeping?); or Scrimgeour lying for whatever reason.
And anyway, putting it on the will when it might have been obvious in no way would the ministry allow it to pass to Harry and with the sword having vanished at that point already (plannedly?) it was more of a shoutout to Harry that the sword is a crucial part of his quest, whether Dumbledore was a Gryffindor by blood or not.
"Sirius Black killed thirteen people!"
"No, it wasn't me it was Peter Pettigrew"
"How could it be him? He's dead, you killed him"
✨ Sirius Black was not The Impostor ✨
Underrated comment
Sadge
Although Sirius didn't have visuals so.....
@@fabiomora6491
also sirius didn't even try to defend himself, he just stood there and laughed.
He didn’t turn into a rat, he vented! It all makes sense now
"peter pettigrew, he's the imposter? everyone voted wrong." i am cackling.
And the hacker
Black 9 votes Peter 1 vote .black was not the imposter.
I really like this. Personally, I'm thinking that somewhere between Godric and Albus one of the heirs, probably female, decided that she didn't want to lose the Gryffindor name and courageously asked her fiance Mr Dumble if they could combine their names into Dumbledore, instead of her just taking his name. Her courage won him over and he agreed. They became the first Dumbledores!
Imagine them ending naming theirselves 'Gryffindumble'...
Courageously asks her fiancé for a favour, *sarcasm on* yes because women can do nothing if a man doesn’t allow them to
@@iambadatnamingthings3547 The man would be part of the decision though, no? He is taking part in the ceremony, 50/50, with her, and would be sharing his name or part/none of. If you don't ask your "to be husband" if he would consent in you taking part of his name, it would make you appear selfish.
Known only by a few, but despite Griffyndor's openmindedness for muggleborn wizards, they were pretty selective and rather elitist when it came to who they arrange marrigies with. It must've always been a dor/dore/door. That's how the young heir, Lady Gryffindor joined the Dumbledore family.
@@iambadatnamingthings3547 You do realize that after last names became commonplace, it was a part of status for their bloodline to continue? What is more, it's not like they had tests that easily proved their lineage, it was almost entirely in the last name. What is more, since the man always carried it, and the wife bore it to symbolize a conjoining of families, it wasn't just done because "Men are Superior". So finally, it is through bravery, because majority of the world would look at this as neither passing down lineage, nor symbolizing the conjoining of families (as in the typical ritual, I understand that mixing the name makes sense as a mixing of the families literally, but that isn't how it was seen traditionally.)
My final point is that we are talking about Wizarding families. To the purebloods it makes absolute sense that they wouldn't want the name lost, and we are talking about the potential descendants of Godric who was all for the freedom of magic to anyone that had shown a connection to it, which could be why they so willingly combined the names. All I'm saying is you can pull this notion of "Women Opression" as if she was really undignified by having to ask, but for someone of that time period that would be such a foreign ideal. It just wouldn't make sense.
"I have no beard and 3 kids. The math doesn't add up."
sociologists prove that bearded people dont have long term relationships. beardless ones tend to have long term ones ... hence more chance of having kids.
Clearly his favourite character and role model is Arthur Weasley
@@user-we7go7ed3l well beards make people uglier, so makes sense
I want 0 kids and 3 money
@@elizabethrose644 I think that's a personal opinion
Plot twist: Harry is the chosen one but Neville is Gryffindor’s descendant
This should be a video they do
@Damian Ocampo I don’t think it’s canon but it would be a cool theory!
exactly plus Godrick could've slept around
Harry was chosen by Voldemort to defeat Voldemort, Neville was chosen by the death eaters to defeat the death eaters
@@gloriamcinerney7383 that's not a theory, thats a cannonical fact xD
Dubz tells that to Harry in the end of OotP
Last time I was this early, Slytherin and Gryffindor hadn't fought yet.
Lol
So, the beginning of time?
@@joemullarkey5719 no. ~1000 years ago
@@joemullarkey5719 Yes
oh so your that old
Won’t that mean Aberforth who didn’t die would be the only living heir
True
which also means that he needs to get BI-ZAY!!
@@Johnrich395 with a goat perhaps
@@harmanjotsingh4230 NO PLEASE NO!
@@loseftheman9474 yes please
I personally like the idea that the Weasleys are the heirs of Gryffindor. It's an unusual coincidence that they all end up there, we know they come from old pureblood lines, and they even have the red hair to match!
Well you could say literally the same about the dumbledores
@@caimanaraujo479 why not both? it could be that both dumbledore's and weasley's are gryffindors descendents
and the dad is interested in muggers and gryffindor liked muggers and mixed wizards , but you'd think they wouldn't be poor if they were the heirs
@@andrew-rn9uipoor in purse, rich in heart
Redirecting funds to the dance budget was an ingenious idea
Best investment
Stocks, it's simple math
Stonks
Best investment to make
I don’t think the payments have gone through yet...
alternatively, weaslys are griffindor descendants. i mean look at how the hat reacts to them in sorting
And ron used the sword to destroy slytherin's locket
That would be amazing:)
for what it's worth, the only Weasley we get to see Sorted is Ron ... so i'm not sure we can take too much from that.
@@JuanMataCFC but that doesnt matter because we know that all weasley kids and parents were in gryffindor but when you look back a the family tree one of there ancestors was a black which means that they have slytherin ancestors which in turn shuts the theory of house related heirs.
@@Raze-Halo And also: ‘Another Weasley! I know just what to do with you...’ the hat sorts him based off his family, not him.
J: "We recommend that you always do your homework"
Me, ignoring my literal homework: Oh. I guess I should do that now...
Procrastination. My worst enemy
Thanks for reminding me 😔
Same😂
Dude same
I love your profile picture
Actually, everyone in the European Harry Potter universe is a direct descendant of Gryffindor - in fact ANY EUROPEAN is of direct descent of another European who lived 1000 years or more before now. Let me explain: On a basic family tree, as you go up, you multiply each side by 2 - 2 parents, 4 grandparents, 8 great-grandparents, so on. As you keep on going back the number will continue to grow exponentially, until after less than 30 generations, you get to an unreasonably huge number, far more than the population at the time. This means two things; many people are on the same family tree more than once, and there are in general many people in the tree. Additionally, a 2013 genetic survey conducted with 2000 individuals spread from Ireland to Turkey found that each and every single person tested of whom DNA they'd tested could be traced back to the same common ancestors who lived 1000 years ago. There are a bunch of other mathematical concepts that I don't understand which prove the same thing, but at the end of the day, it's safe to say that there is a direct ancestral relation between pretty much everyone in the European Harry Potter universe, considering they are all from the same cultural background.
So does that mean.............sweet holy Alabama
Well that is at least for lines that never died out entirely but to be fair for a line to die out it usually has to do so fairly quickly for the same reason. Because there are a growing number of people involved with each generation the chance of them all dying childless drops. It is less likely that a single individual survives and has children than it is that at least one of their children do which is still less than any one of their children surviving etc. In general a lot more people have to die for a bloodline to go extinct the more time that passes.
It's not that everyone is descended from everyone, it's that certain family lines, like Gengis Khan are particularly fecundi. There are about a dozen mothers up to around 50,000 years ago most people inherited their mitochondrial DNA from.
so I did the math… and
1) you
2) 2 parents
3) 4 grandparents
4) 8 great grandparents
5) 18 great great grandparents
6) 32 great great great grandparents
7) 64 great great great great grandparents
8) 128 great great great great great grandparents
9) 256 great great great great great great grandparents
10) 512 great great great great great great great grandparents
11) 1024 great great great great great great great great grandparents
12) 2048 great great great great great great great great great grandparents
13) 4096 great great great great great great great great great great grandparents
14) 8192 great great great great great great great great great great great grandparents
15) 16384 great great great great great great great great great great great great grandparents
16) 32768 great great great great great great great great great great great great great grandparents
17) 65536 14x great grandparents
18) 131,072 15x great grandparents
19) 262,144 16x great grandparents
20) 524,288 17x great grandparents
21) 1,048,576 18x great grandparents
22) 2,097,152 19x great grandparents
23) 4,194,304 20x great grandparents
24) 8,388,608 21x great grandparents
25) 16,777,216 22x great grandparents
26) 33,554,432 23x great grandparents
27) 67,108,864 24x great grandparents
28) 134,217,728 25x great grandparents
29) 268,435,456 26x great grandparents
30) 536,870,912 27x great grandparents
536.9 million people english population 1000 years ago
1,250,000…
not necessarily a ‘direct descendent’ either but yeah other then that
Also, the sword came to both Harry and Neville right after they showed loyalty to Dumbledore.
The sword will present itself to any worthy Gryffindor. It doesn't matter who they are or who they are related to. Fawkes the pheonix comes to Harry because he stayed loyal to Dumbledore in the 2nd book and movie.
Neville did not show loyalty to Dumbledore. The man was dead and buried at that point. Harry showed loyalty to Dumbledore and Fawkes was able to bring him the hat. Valor is what reveals the sword to a true Griffindor.
@@megsesvids Yep; also though, what if Neville is Gryffindor's Heir or maybe the Weasleys'?!
@@morrigankasa570 I thought of Neville too. He's the truest lion in the lion house.
@@yawninglion1677 Though the Weasleys' might be the Gryffindor heir beyond that, if you also include that they all have Red Hair like Godric Gryffindor and remembering that Mrs. Weasleys' brothers fought so well & hard that it took 5 Death Eaters to defeat them and Godric was known to be an extremely great Duelist himself.
I was so confused when I saw J in the Gryffindor shirt
Then I read the title
I was just going to say “nice touch with the shirt J”
why lol
@@Rachel-uy7pv I didn't read the title
Lol
Them talking about among us is like a teacher trying to be “hip”
ikr 😂
All good teachers know what their kids are into. It's not trying to be 'hip'--I'm a teacher myself, and kids trust you more when you speak their language.
My advisor saw us playing among us and got mad but then we explained that we were playing a community game that builds friendship. We even convinced her to get it! I hope she doesn’t play it and see the neck snapping.
@@missflite74 a teacher that watches Harry Potter theories cool
I think you mean “HYEEEP!!!”
Radagast Ganondorf, the wizard who values oddity and malice. His animal is a Rhosgobel Rabbit.
Also, the Dumbledore family live in Godrics Hollow.
Yeah but they moved there after their dad Percival killed those three Muggles and moved from Mould on the Wold
The Potters literally lived and died there.
@@lynnerose7891fr
The we found it “it was in Pennsylvania” call back had me wheezing I was laughing so hard
very underrated part of the video😂😂
Definitely
Hey I'm in Pennsylvania why didn't I find the sword :( if a Slytherin could find it fittingly a Hufflepuff should've found it. I mean. It's what we do.
Still waiting on a SuperCarlinBrothers produced, directed and written Hogwarts founder TV series
It'll never happen if they keep attacking jk Rowling who owns the copyright.
Definitely
@@drewpamon sadly that might be true
Bruh imagine there’s a tragic backstory of Slytherien losing his entire family to anti-wizard people and the only thing he had left was his locket. He goes to stay with his family’s friends the hufflepuffs who give him a bed and a place to stay until the anti-wizards track him there and burn down the house where Slytherien leaves with their only kid, a young girl named Helga who is obsessed with a cup for some odd reason. Right at the final confrontation there’s no escape as he and Helga are backed into a corner. The man raises how sword and prepares to cut them down, until there’s a clash as a young Godric comes to the aid of people who he doesn’t even know as wizards but he just sees as people in need. Also throughout the season we work in Ravenclaw somehow
Pancakes every Saturday!
It's weird to me that a big theme of the books is that people put way too stock into bloodlines, and yet the fandom is constantly wondering about who is a descendant of which famous witch/wizard. What happened to, "it's our choices that make us who we are"?
I think part of it is because the books contradict themselves. Harry’s, and Voldemort’s bloodlines end up mattering a *lot*. Despite how Harry is supposed to represent the idea that where you come from doesn’t matter at all.
@@LangThoughts yeah, if they don't then the whole deathly hallows part is just useless.
@@karabelle617 Harry sn't special because of his Peverel blood, though. The fact that he has the Cloak matters to the story, but it's his big heart, leadership and tremendous selflessness that makes the difference. The fact that Voldemortalso has Peverall ancestry only reinforces the theme of personal choice.
@@colinvandenberg3446 I find that it takes away the theme of Bloodlines not mattering. Our Hero wasn't someone with an unknown bloodline, like Neville or someone without one like hermione (who is often quoted as the reason they don't matter). Our hero is the sole known heir to the peveral brothers, and therefore the sole known heir to the deathly hallows. But even more recently from a timeline perspective, his money comes from one of his ancesters who made a potion and became rich. The only reason harry never wants for money unlike Ron is because of his bloodline.
additionally it's heavily implied that Voldemort made harry his equal partially because harry was half-blood.
One could say "well he still became an amazing person and that's the point" but I think its a cop out that harry is at an advantage in half the story over Voldemort. The same Voldemort who was effectively disowned by his family due to his no-mag father. Whose bloodline was full of inbreeding and other issues to the point that it just fell apart. The same Voldemort who had nothing, came from nothing.
Voldemort had a sucky bloodline, and he was sucky. Harry had a very different story, which a family who cared and loved for him, even if they died early. Which one of these people turned out "good?" And which one of these turned out "bad"?. Who had a lineup of adults who loved their parents and ready to help them? And who had none of that?
I'm not saying the intention wasn't to focus on choices mattering more than blood. But akin to how The Creator "Accidently" made a pro slavery joke in the form of the house elves' and Hermione's attempts to free them, once you look at it beyond what is told to you... there is some iffiness.
@@karabelle617 Yes, characters put a lot of stock in bloodlines, and the fact that Harry is a half-blood is important to his character. My point is that as strong as the theme of bloodlines is in the books is equally prescient the theme that choices define the characters more than their lineage. James Poter had the same kind of exceptional lineage as Marvolo Gaunt, but he and his family judged people by their actions instead of their blood status. It's no accident James lived in a mansion while the Gaunts lived in a shack. There's also the Malfoys and Weasleys, who were both pure-blood families but while one household was held together by love the other was governed by hate.
Dumbledore is a great wizard because he inherited Gryffindor's magichlorians
lol great star wars reference
How dare you
Hahahahahahahahaha!
I was mad at first but now im pissing myself laughing 🤣
100%
J: we don’t know more than 1 generation back for one of the most important characters
Hermione: first time?
I think Dumbledor could have easily “fulfilled the requirements” to wield the sword by making it back to Hogwarts and up to his office after putting the cursed ring on in the gaunt’s shack.
From what I remember, he put on the ring after using the sword to destroy the horcrux
@@MaryAlx it May be that way in the movie but in the book. He tells Harry that when he found it he tried to use it to see his parents and his sister . He says “it didn’t occur to me that it was now a horcrux, that it was sure to carry a curse”
@@taberquigley I know what you are referring to, but in Snape's memories, he is asking Dumbledore if he thought that by breaking the ring he would also break the curse. Dumbledore says that it was something like that. That is why I think that he first used the sword on the ring, and then tried to use it to see his family.
@@MaryAlx If he is using the sword to break the curse then he has already put on the ring otherwise there is no curse to break. There is no difference in how events played out in the books and the movies (at least in this case)
@@MaryAlx he said that because he couldn't tell Snape it was a horcrux.
Salazar Slytherin was not a direct descendant of the Peverells but his lineage got mixed with them eventually.
Exactly! And Salazar Slytherin (born in 993 ce) lived hundreds of years before the Peverell brothers (born in 1214 ce)!
When I first read the books , my headcanon was that Gryffindor was the Sorting Hat Consciousness. That's why he was a good judge of character, and that's why the Sword of Gryffindor would always come out. I thought because he was inside the Hat, he couldn't have any kids.
Wow, that's some Galaxy-brain level theorizing. Good one!
Even if the Sorting Hat was Griffindor's consciousness, he could have still had descendants before he became the Hat.
GET INSPIRED: ruclips.net/video/8gHwP0UgaDA/видео.html
Seriously, i have something to say, so Listen!
We, as a community, need to Tweet towards J.K.Rowling
that she should allow the Copyright for Harry Potter
to be losened a bit.
Cause we need some Sort of Reboot,
as almost all books are Lost in Adaptation.
The movies just do not represent the franchise right;
evidend by Dobby alone. If you know what i mean...
And even if we wouldnt need a reboot,
the creativity of the fans is still limited too much,
if you get what i mean!
Like it is, no one can give us what we need and/or want:
A lot people want a Series about the 4 Founders!
A lot understand how lost in Adaptation all the books
are and want all the Movies remade, maybe as a Cartoon,
maybe not.
And lastly, a lot of people love the idea
of a ‚All generation at once’-Cartoon, as
the AMV above shows. Isnt it epic?
These 3 things should ALL come to fruition,
in my opinion. Not to mention at least 1!!
Currently, the franchise is limited too much...
Fans should be allowed to make Animations
about Hogwarts and all ist generations and
Magical secrets.
...If you agree the creativity is restrained too harshly,
tweet to Rowling! And also discuss!
And yeah, i know Rowling gets Tweets about a
whole other subject nowadays, but lets
get away from that for a second, to help
the Harry Potter Franchise, ok?!
@@ishitaasen3733 he said griffindor not Dumbledore... Also Dumbledore only hired them because of the curse of that position because he knew they wouldn't last more than 1 year and also because no one else wanted the job because they all knew about the curse and it was getting harder for him to find a teacher
The sorting hat was gryffindor’s hat imbued with the mind of all four founders.
As a medieval enthusiast, I’ve always found it hilarious how Hogwarts was supposedly built during the Anglo-Saxon era, but has enormous gothic architecture etc. In the 990’s A.D, you’d be lucky to find a castle with a keep bigger than a modern large suburban house!
they had time turners so they could go and checkout the future architecture, but the muggles couldn't see the castle so it didn't influence the fashion in their time, it's all clear :)
Yeah, but it’s a school. The keep wasn’t intended to house a family
It’s known that the castle was updated constantly as the years went on so it’s not intended that it looked the way it does now when it was first built.
Perhaps once a muggle got to see the castle, became inspired and created the first gothic design.
But they had magic..
Plot twist: Harry is related to Dumbledore because a Phoenix came to him when he was in need.
Hang on, didn't Dumbledore explain this already? IIRC he said that nothing but the fact that Harry showed him true loyalty in the chamber of secrets could have summoned Fawkes.
Well no its because fawks is Dumbledore's horcrux so Dumbledore came and helped Harry through fawks
Dumbledore doesn’t have a horcrux or he’d still be alive
@@cristiano.manchesterunited3972 did SCB say something about fawks flying in front of Dumbledore when Voldemort used the killing curse towards him
@@GamerLord-ro3sf jk Rowling confirmed that dumbldore doesn't have a horcrux
Sus was definitely a thing before among us lol
So I've heard from Australians.
Sus has been around for at least 15 years I used to say that when I was like 8 haha
100%. Me and my boys have been using "sus" since 2013
I feel like since there’s always new people getting on the internet for the first time, there’s always some trend/slang term being claimed by the new generation even though most of the time it’s recycled sometimes from like 3 years ago lol
@@frostyskeletons8950 Yes yes yes it's especially annoying because I'm in one of the younger generation and people will claim things that existed before but they acte like it didn't
Thing is, after 1000 years, everyone in Europe, wizard and muggle, is a descendent of Hogwarts founders, as long as their line didn't die
Tbh especially because everyone of european descent are descendents of charlemagne
kind of true cause theres only at least 50 families to chose from, and considering most of them are just branches of others, at the time of the founders, there was at most 10 branches to chose from if you want to marry, so.... whole wizarding world is a descendent beside the muggleborns, issue is you need a worthy heir, so not the whole wizarding world can. however not true for the muggle world
@@AnComZharptitza You are right to point out that common ancestry seems much more likely within the wizarding world. But I do like the idea that even muggles might be more likely to be related to the Hogwarts founders than we would expect. The idea that anyone of European descent alive today is in some way related to Charlemagne (or any other European around 1000 AD, for that matter) is basically a numbers game, and it may be an oversimplification, but genetic evidence seems to at least suggest that any two Europeans alive today might have a large number of common ancestors when you go back 1000 years. If you could apply the same to the wizarding world, "pure blood" fanaticism would appear rather pointless... www.nature.com/news/most-europeans-share-recent-ancestors-1.12950
@@haukenot3345 it is pointless but i mean people have done this irl about being royal so its not unrealistic lol.
I also thought that Harry and Neville were distant cousins and descendants of Gryffindor. Albus said it himself;
“only a true Gryffindor could have pulled that out of the hat.”
One year later and I’m almost done paying off my upstart loan. Literally a miracle that they sponsored you and I took my chance. No other bank would take a second look at me due to my age.
Did you accomplish what you want to do with the loan?
@@fleetskipper1810 I needed to pay off some previous debts
My theory, Fawks is Godric Gryffindor. He became a phoenix animagus and never died.
I don’t believe animagi can take the form of magical creatures. That said, I really like this idea. I would argue that instead, Godric transfigured himself into a phoenix. It is incredibly dangerous for a witch/wizard to transfigure themself into an animal form. This is because when they do so, their mind also takes on the properties of that animal. So if Godric were to transfigure himself into a phoenix, he would have the brain of a phoenix and it would be irreversible. My head-canon is that he was probably close to death and transfigured himself as a final act, and as a phoenix he was immortal.
Also, if the theory that Dumbledore is a Gryffindor is true (which I feel that it is) then the idea that Fawks is Godric adds a whole new layer to the “a phoenix will always come to a Dumbledore in need” thing. If Fawks is Godric, and the Dumbledore are just descendants of Gryffindor, than the phoenix that comes to Dumbledores is just Godric helping his heirs in phoenix form.
Yeah but no
@@lukenewton2830 Well Dumbledore’s Patronus is a Phoenix and your Patronus is also your Animagus form so…you probably can turn into magical creatures
@@soo1579 no it doesn't work like that it was never canon that they need to be the same
Wasn't Sirius Black's animagus a grim......
0:28. I can’t tell if he actually hit something with the sword or if Scott is just amazing at editing. 😂😂😂
Me either
Can we get them to make a movie series of the founding of Hogwarts with Mark Hamill as Gryffindor?
i would be so down for this
Yes, please.
And Harrison Ford could be Salazar Slytherin.
Not Hamill. Kurt Russell. With Andy Serkis as Slytherin, Cate Blanchett as Ravenclaw, and Michelle Fairley as Hufflepuff.
@@Backyardpastor come on. Chris Hemsworth as Gryffindore, Tom Hiddleston as Slytherin. Rachel Weisz as Ravenclaw, Miranda Otto as Hufflepuff.
I personally would’ve preferred Neville be the heir to Gryffindor... his story is that of a young cub learning it’s roar.
Oh, yeah.
To quote Sir Terry pratchet:
"It's a Sword. It's not suppose to be safe."
And I don't think the sword has a safety feature that prevents people from using it.
It's a weapon though, and weapons tend to have features to prevent people from using them.
Slytherin's wand is a great example of that. Its allegiance was with the bloodline, and it even had a specific spell/password that disabled it completely, which ended up rendering it permanently useless after Gormlaith Gaunt used it and died without passing on the secret. That wand has been buried in Ilvermorny's garden, dying with that branch of the Slytherin bloodline, further proving that the relics of the Founders stay in their respective families.
@@DeeSnow97
But we already know "the Wand chooses the Wizard", so we already know that wands have some intelligence of their own. However, the sword is not a wand, thus we can't expect it to act like a wand.
Plus, we don't have any examples of relics like Hufflepuff's cup, Slytherin's locket, or Ravenclaw's Diadem being able to think for themselves.
Lastly, we know that the sword was owned by people other than Gryphondor. i.e. Goblins.
I would say that with magic involved, there's another possibility that would be almost both. The sword takes on that which makes it stronger. So, maybe anyone can use the sword as a standard sword, but only a true gryffindor or master of the sword (whichever you would like to say) can bring out those aspects, and have it be a strong weapon. Like with the elder wand, working for Voldemort, but not working extremely well. The other thing is that there is clear evidence the sword has a level of the intelligence that wands do. Otherwise, how would it appear to true gryffindors in need?
@@cliffritch7304
We also need to consider that the sword "Always appears to a worthy Griffondor" through the sorting hat. The sorting hat is known to be intelligent and able to see into the minds of people. So is being a "True Griffindor" decided by the hat or the sword?
"It will teach her things."
"What if she cuts herself?"
"Then that will be an important lesson."
The second object Dumbledore left to Harry was the Sword of Gryffindor, but Scrimgeour refused to give it to him, saying it was a historical artifact and not Dumbledore’s. So, maybe he wanted Harry to get the sword as an heir pice and not to destroy the deadly hallows since he knew the MM would not give the sword to Harry.
Harry not being Gryffndor's heir plays up the whole 'its not who you are born, but your choices that count' school of thought.
"Only to pull out the sword .. oh god I hit something..."
*said as sparks fall*
Me: 'Tis barely a scratch ...
*SCB, I quite literally shot soda through my nose on this, as I had just taken a drink ... and this made me laugh at the same time.*
Yeah.... I think he broke something like the whole celling... XD
I wasn't sure this was real, it was too epic.
"A scratch? The ceiling's broken!" (I hope this reference makes sense)
@@siennastra8718 it makes sense
Yeah, there's no way Godric Gryffindor couldn't get laid.
Yeah sure he could’ve but what makes you so sure he would want to?
He may not have been married, though, and was just "sowing his wild oats". Note that none of the present-day teachers at Hogwarts are married. I've long wondered why not.
I heard he had a girlfriend, but she dumped him when he suggested her letting him hide his sword in her sorting hat.
@@PhilBagels strange detail. Maybe it's just that it would be a strenuous relationship considering the teachers are at school for 10 months of the year.
@@The_Jovian In the real world, there are plenty of boarding schools where some of the teachers are married. A teacher's spouse could easily live in the castle - there's plenty of room. Or in Hogsmeade village, where it's not that difficult for married couples to get together.
Not to mention, Dumbledore left the sword to someone in his will as if he knew it were his property to give away
O that actually makes sense
He just did that so Harry/Hermione knew the sword was useful for something, destroying horcruxes.
Also there was a big thing that it wasn’t his property to give away, hence Harry not getting it.
Possible candidate for heir of Ravenclaw: Quirrell.
-He met Voldemort in the forest in Albania, which is where Helena hid the diadem - maybe he was looking for it?
-He was tempted by Voldemort and what he could offer, much like Helena was tempted by the diadem
-The diadem is worn on the head, and Quirrell had Voldemort on the back of his head
This actually makes so much sense.
The moment he said “it’s just math” made me think they didn’t pay the math budget 🤣
Edit to add at 7:32 he literally says they didn’t pay it 😂🤣
"Godric is described as being the most outspoken of accepting muggle borns into Hogwarts."
Um, this is false. Hufflepuff actually has that distinction. Godric merely defended her point when Slytherin tried to make it an ultimatum.
@Peri Uluırmak It's the trait of gryffindor and hufflepuff but wormtail, a gryffindor, betrayed his friends so hufflepuff is more worthy to say 'loyal'.
i agree
@@thegryffinclaw7541 No Recklessness, Chivalry+ Bravery were the Gryffindor traits.
The Hufflepuffs got Hard Working, Loyalty, and Friendliness .
@Top Lobster you are eight
Hufflepuff is the best House
I bet when Godric enchanted the sword to appear to Gryffindors in need that he got a lot of joy knowing the goblins would never be able to hold on to it.
Anyone else find J's lack of knowledge of the term sus as being kinda sus?
Very sus
OMG YES
. 。 • ﾟ 。 .
. . 。 。 .
. 。 ඞ 。 . • •
ﾟ J was The Impostor. 。 .
' 0 Impostors remain 。
ﾟ . . , . .
@@JuanMataCFC woah
I always thought that Dumbledore was able to use the sword because giving up on the oportunity to see his late parents and sister by destroying the ring was a tremendous act of courage
But Dumbledore *did* try to use it! He told Harry that’s why his hand got messed up and he only had a year to live! Only after that did he have the strength to remove the Resurrection Stone and destroy the ring
He took the stone out first so no
@@larrytinsley4247 no he didn’t. The resurrection stone was cracked after Dumbledore destroyed the ring
@@lukenewton2830 Harry dropped the working resurrection stone in the forest before the final battle
Could you imagine the reaction of Godric in the afterlife as he watches a descendent get sorted into Slytherin? Salazar would have a field day. 🤣
Maybe Griffendor was gay like albus.... and he views all his house as his kids and thats why the sword goes to any griffendor unlike the other house items that stay in the family
Ooooh, and maybe Slytherin and Griffindor's relationship was kind of a parallel to Dumbledore and Grindlewald's!
Maybe? 🤔
Love this theory
Also an heir/next of kin does not need to be a child of the deceased- the line could have continued through nieces or nephews, etc.
So building on this, maybe he was estranged from his biological family due to his sexuality, and even if he had blood relatives he willed all his belongings to Hogwarts, so the school is the only heir.
That sparkssome questions
Your brother Ben has a beard and no kids as of yet. Slipping on the Math Ben haha
love you both just had to make the joke
Should've paid the math budget lol
Where is Ben?
I thought maybe the Weasleys would be somehow the misfit heirs of Gryffindor, which is a why they are so well known in the magical community, yet so made fun of for being so poor. They all make it it to Gryffindor house, easily. etc etc
Also they have a crazy big house, their family is obessed with herilooms as if they know they are missing a gigantic one, like the Sword of gryffindor??
also same name!!!! hahaha
@@prestonjohnson8805 Dude no way! my twin in the comments
We must be Fred and George, which makes us also heirs of Gryffindor??
HEEEYYYY BROTHER!
I'd like to think that in a moment of extreme loyalty to friends a Hufflepuff could pull the cup from the hat
and have a cheers with all the guys, not to forget the pancakes :)
Chamber of secrets deleted scene:
Harry feels the hat is heavier he reaches inside and he takes out a... cup...
Tom: is that, Hufflepuff's cup?
Harry still in shock gets killed by the basilisk, ginny dies and tom becomes a full human.
The "griffin... door, if you will" line earned my like. Perfect
9:40 I feel like I can not relate to having a father doing this but I’m scared
“Hey guys guess where we found it?”
“It was in Pennsylvania” 😂 yessss
I think the Weasleys could be Gryffindor's ancestors.
Descends *. I mean Descendants* Yeah I am correcting myself too sometimes 🤣😂😂😅
*Time Travel
@@MrPhillipcmartin 🤣😂😂 Yeah no , I don’t subscribe to that theory !
*Descendants
My personal headcanon is that Godric is actually the father of Helena Ravenclaw after falling in love with Rowena, he could still have modern descendants if Helena had kids before being killed by the Bloody Baron
Plot Twist: What if weasley's are descendants of griffindor
Direct our by marriage I wonder if prewett is another name for peverell that got changed by marriage
We took a gamble on Nevada, but found the sword in Pennsylvania
😂😂😂
lol
Referencing last weeks video.. nicely done ;)
After a looong search in Arizona and Georgia
Even though like 99.9999999999 percent won’t see this. I love y’all and hope you have a great week
Thank you and you too!
You fool! You complete and utter bafoon, you absolute saddlegoose! I did see it! (And also thank you)
Thanks! I asked a girl I used to go to High School with on a date today and she said yes! I hope it goes well
You too! :)
When do young witches/wizards get the trace placed on them? Theorize, brothers!
wooooaaaah
I assume similarly to the book and quil as soon as they’re born
They get it once they start school, before that parents are responsible for their childrens magic!
@@zoeaesir3080 this. Which is why it's real weird they don't show up sooner for Muggle-horns.
@@lyndsaybrown8471 That is truue! I didn´t even think about that!! That IS weird
Also also actually actually, isn’t Harry distantly related to Salazar Slytherin???
Like he is related to Ignotus Peverell, one of the three brothers. He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named is the descendant of the second brother, Cadmus Peverell. You-Know-Who is also a descendant of Salazar Slytherin. Sooooo you do the math.
Wait that makes sense right? They should really pay more attention to the math budget. Comment your thoughts!
One brother died the night his wand was stolen, the other brother died after using the stone.
Wouldn't only the one harry was related to have descendants? The cloak got passed on in the surviving line...
That's only true if it was through the paternal line. His mother could have been a Slytherin.
We know cadmus was an distant direct ancestor of gaunt mean he marry slytherin descendants so ignotus peverell wife could be godric Gryffindor?
I think you guys should do a "who is a descendant of Ravenclaw" video because it couldn't have stopped so early.
It’s me y’all. Mystery solved
Luna's mother is descended from ravenclaw??? Maybe????
"It was in Pennsylvania." LOL
"He was sus. Everyone voted wrong." You guys are killing me with the jokes tonight. I love them all!
I think the phoenix metaphors are more literal. I think Albus Dumbledore is a literal reincarnation of Gryffondor. He probably doesnt know it and it probably has nothing to do with the Dumbledore family tree. Gryffondor has no heirs because he himself is born again whenever he dies. Maybe part of the magic used makes him sterile and cant retaining old memories, but will undeniably always be the same person
A little bit of math leads to nearly all purebloods being related to everyone in the founders time that had magical descendants.
"If he did know it would have come up".
Yeah, because Dumbledoor is so good at telling Harry things.
"How could Godric not have kids with that beard?" While discussing Albus in the same breath..maybe Godric was also gay with Slytherin?
But I believe Fawkes was Godric. Like a guiding angel for his descendants. Can see when it was Fawkes who brings the hat and sword to Harry in the chamber. Especially in your video if you say Salazar is the basilisk and Fawkes fights it.come to think of it, harry could be a descendant as well, as Fawkes comes to his aid.... Dumbledore answers how Harry could pull out the sword, but not why Fawkes came to his aid.
Doesn’t Dumbledore say that Flawles came to Harry’s aid because Harry showed Dumbledore real loyalty in the chamber of secrets?
@@fleetskipper1810 never understood that. Maybe the @SuperCarlinHeyBrothers should do a video on that lol
Fawkes came to harry because harry showed his loyalty towards Dumbledore in the chamber of secrets.. And Dumbledore tells this reason to harry..
@@yitziyyb there is no point to do a video on it if it is stated in the series.
I appreciate that you guys work hard to help make every Potter fan feel welcome! Keep up the good work! It does not go unrecognized :)
Gryffin door
Dumble door
Yes I’m sold lol 😂
1:34 that just made me realize that harry and voldemort are very extended family
"You're telling me this guy with this beard had no kids, i have no beard and three kids!" 🤣🤣
Pettigrew was sus and he even escaped through a vent, but the real impostor is Barty Crouch Jr hands down
Lol 😂
There is an imposter among us!!
XD
True
Among us Is dead I’m not tryna be rude tho
@@SowDah_ does anyone care
The reason why he was able to use the sword was because it was where it always belong when it’s not being used in Godrich Gryffindor‘s old room or “his secret room”
Since Fawkes went to Harry, does that mean that he's a true Dumbledore?
I think that's definitely up for debate, considering that Fawkes is Dumbledore's constant phoenix. It's hard to say the level of control or lack thereof the Dumbledores have over their phoenix companions. Dumbledore was also technically in need because of his suspension as headmaster by the school's board of governors. By assisting Harry and preventing the deaths of more students, Fawkes ensured that Dumbledore could return to Hogwarts and continue his life's work. Additionally, Fawkes knew of Dumbledore's investment in and particular regard towards Harry. I guess it depends on how aware you believe phoenixes are. I imagine they're very wise beyond most creatures (even in the Wizarding world), or you could say that Dumbledore simply ordered Fawkes to help Harry should he ever be absent. Then I imagine Fawkes' magical protective instincts then transferred to Harry. I like to think that a phoenix has wisdom beyond other creatures and has greater perception rather than just acting on the order of its wizard. That seems a little too owl-like for a fantastic beast with the majesty of a phoenix.
What happens if the great grandfather that had the pheonix was a peveral who had two daughters. One married a Dumbledore the other married a potter.
i'm currently working on this playlist, "Harry potter | Super Carlin Brothers" And your line about gryffon-door as in the gryffon door knockers was pretty clever. I love this playlist because i'm such a huge fan of harry potter
This is a pretty good theory, but Dumbledore wouldn't have necessarily needed the sword to destroy the ring. We all know Dumbledore had an insane arsenal of magic at his command. Me guess is he probably used that fire spell that got him and Harry out of that terrible lake, maybe even that fire spell that destroyed the diadem. We certainly wouldn't have to be worried that he wouldn't be able to control it the fire like Crabbe (or Goyle ) can never remember who is who.
I'm not trying to disprove the theory or anything, I just wanted to point out that Dumbledore would probably have no need of it. Him being an heir is still really cool though!
Hold on. If the sword presented itself to Jay... then that means he is a true Griffindor, FALSE SLYTHERIN!
Or he so true a Slytherin that he stole it
It's a fake sword he got from his aunt Bellattix. 😂
I love that were making conspiracy theories for the conspiracy theorists
"The griffin, the griffin door, if you will."
Ok, that convinced me.
J- "of course you do you read the title!"
Me- didn't read the title because I watch every video 👀
The fact that fawks came to Harry's aid on multiple occasions, and that Dumbledore tried to leave the sword of Gryffindor to him makes harry in many ways Dumbledore's adopted son. Really wish Fawks had pledged his allegiance to Harry after Dumbledore died. It just seemed so obvious.
Ok, but can we talk about how there was a major missed opportunity for Draco to have some serious Zuko-like character development? Can’t you imagine him helping them because he was on the inside, and knows things? Harry could also have gotten character development out of it in learning to forgive and let go of his hatred of Draco, because we all know he had a serious fixation on Draco for a while.
I have a headcanon where when Dumbledore used to live in Gryffindor Tower as a student, his dormitory would eventually be the same one Harry and Ron would live in.
My fav part of every episode is when jay mentions his kids. He’s such a proud dad 😁
Oooohhh so this is what it feels like to be early. Hi mostly empty towel section! 👋
Hi😊
@@notahappyelf671 hello!
I’ve always wondered why they call it the towel section 😂
@@catpiratepewe-ah3136 it started in a super early video of theirs entitled "42 uses for a towel" and it just stuck lol
@@nathanjplatt you have no idea how much it has driven me crazy looking for the video that started that saying
Things I learned in the first two minutes: Salazar and Harry are relatives via the Peverells... I am so inexplicably glad to learn this.
so harry technacly is also slitherens air bc the peverals came AFTER salazar
bc harys grandad was a peveral and he whent to hogwarts
@@idiot528
I don't think Harry is Slytherin's Heir because Tom embodied the Slytherins more than Harry does. He had magical heritage - not pure but apparently that doesn't matter despite what Malfoy says- he was ruthless and cruel and cunning even before he started school on top of being part of Salazar's bloodline through the Gaunts, which Harry is not, and possessing the Parseltongue which Harry only got from the Horcrux.
I feel like these guys are so underrated. They are so hilarious and make my pea sized understand these theories. Like why can’t YOU be my teacher?! Also they should have like way more subs-
Neville is the heir of Gryffindor!
* When you want a SCB, Twoset, and Seamus Gorman crossover but you know it’s never going to happen* 😶
Well at least u got two thirds of your wish since SCB and Seamus have worked together a few times
Hey guys? Could you do some Percy Jackson stuff? I think you would make some great theories or quizzes.
Ok so “sus”: literally just short for “suspicious”. Probably used to type faster in public servers in among us.
its been around before among us
I used it and saw it get used years ago in Town of Salem, and it was probably around before that too
Yeah, even I've heard the term "sus" being used for a long time. It definitely has been a thing long before among us.
that’s sus
it's been used since the time when Hogwarts was founded
13:05 Helena didn’t know where the diadem was, only in the movies she did, in the books she didn’t.
Yeah but here he meant she was the last person to have known the whereabouts of the diadem before Tom tricked her into telling where she hid it and made it into a horcrux not when Harry asked her about it. Just like how Hepzibah was the last to have to cup before Tom killed and stole it from her. All in all he meant the relics always had been with the descendants of the founders.
literally one of the best channels out there!
Oooh
I do partly like the idea of having characters related to the founders
“A Phoenix will appear to any dumbledor in need” *faux comes to Harry in the chamber* HMMMMM
That’s because (according to a theory) dumbldore sent fawx
I always thought that the phoenix was related to Gryffindor!!!
Does every House have to have an heir? And what exactly they inherit? The Founder’s favorite potty and a bunch of pupils? Lol
10:48 “when Dumbledore destroys the Ring”
Yer a Hobbit, Harry
I read this while taking a drink and now I know the pain of Twisted Tea coming out of my nose. 😆