As a wee lad I was obsessed with LEGO HP. I think my nostalgia will win over my willpower and make the steep purchase. This set is amazing but also could be used as a mean castle MOC parts pack. Same with the new HP mini Hogwarts castle. Both are cool sets on their own and make great supplementary part packs! Awesome review Ash
It’s called the “Sorcerer’s Stone” in the land of freedom because the book publishers didn’t think the children are smart enough to want to read a book based on a Philosopher. True story
Nah I'm American and I say philosopher's stone. That's what it is in the movie and I thought that's what it was in the books, or I might have just got the British version. Anyway, it sounds better and if you say sorcerer's stone you're just wrong.
32:44 So Griphook’s face cut is not from Gringotts scene but from the Malfoy Manor scene before when Bellatrix cut his face because she was mad cause he wasn’t sure if the Sword of Gryffindor is forgery or not. Does that mean we are getting the Malfoy Manor set with his face print reused??? I hope so….
I really think that the underground section should be a separate set or even done somehow different - I think they needed to put a lot of effort into "construction" side of it and the design effect is nice, but not that crazy good... Gringotts itself from the outside looks beautiful, maybe inside I would like little little more space, but it's really good anyway... The dragon I would also skip if I could - maybe again another set. A lot of thrown into the one set which is making it spectacular for sure, but have the feeling that all separated could have done great job and be more affordable for fans and allow "crazy fans" to have all the sections...
Plus the price, for not much more you are able to have whole Diagon Alley (not mention that historically it was way cheaper) - really difficult to justify and display is another issue because of how tall it is as a whole set
20:00 is the intent to somehow attach the dragon over the front of the building. edit: Might explain the broken glass around too. Also its ontop on the front of the manuals
Diagon Alley remastered done. Gringotts remastered done. How about Knockturn Alley? Would be cool to connect it from the back of Weasley's Wizard Wheezes or Gringotts - have never got a Leaky Cauldron set too!
I saw somone fix it by cutting off the inward edges of both of the stickers and it didnt look too bad but its a shame they couldnt just make it a print
You put so much time and effort into this review, thank you, I appreciate how thorough you were, Didn’t rush it or anything, recently watched a review by swiftbricks and it was SUPER rushed and missed absolutely everything. Thanks Ash!
I feel like they should have gone the jabba’s palace route and sold the two sections separately for people who want to display the bank with the rest of diagon alley, since people who would do that would have to have the underground section off to the side somewhere
What an awesome review! I was advised to come see it while watching Topic Bricks and Lauren live build of Gringotts and I am soo glad I did! Wonderful review! ❤🎉
Love your videos mate just realised I wasn’t subscribed so I am now! When you do the prices at the start of the review any chance you can include it in £? Don’t know how easy you can get this info just means us over the pond don’t have to look it up
Anyone else find it kinda lazy from Lego to include 2 faces on one head I think when you spend this much on a set you should get 2 facial expressions per character
I think the complete opposite. They could’ve just left the other side blank, or just slightly change the expression. Raise an eyebrow, close a smile etc. I think this is incredible.
I love how you go into so much detail for each part. I definitely think this is an amazing set and I think they did it perfectly. Nice job on the video ashnflash!!!
19:10 the Roman numerals are 1: 4714 (Gringott's Bank, 2002) 2: 10217 (Diagon Alley, 2011) 3: 40289 (Diagon Alley, 2018) 4: 70417 (this set.. with a typo?) LXX (thousands) CDXVII is 70, 417, I suppose the full number should be LXXVI with bars over them, then CDXVII. Seems like the number 70417 is an unused gap between Pirates III and Hidden Side. idk
Would the second heads for the goblin represent the goblins from the first Harry Potter and the other heads are for the goblins in the deathly hollows?
I love this set! It looks genuinely so great, and the fact they put it on a baseplate AND included the Minecart system just makes this phenomenal!!
As a wee lad I was obsessed with LEGO HP. I think my nostalgia will win over my willpower and make the steep purchase. This set is amazing but also could be used as a mean castle MOC parts pack. Same with the new HP mini Hogwarts castle. Both are cool sets on their own and make great supplementary part packs! Awesome review Ash
Ahah give in to your nostalgia! And thank you!
Дешевле купить детали отдельно, чем переплачивать за лицензию и разбирать на части...
8:30 wow! That is so cool how they did that “everything you touch will multiply” look to Bellatrix’s vault! Mind blown 🤯!
Its very impressive. Definitely going to pick it up at some point. Id love a playset inside Bellatrix's vault at some point
As a British person, I am very impressed by you calling the Philosopher’s Stone by its correct term.
It’s called the “Sorcerer’s Stone” in the land of freedom because the book publishers didn’t think the children are smart enough to want to read a book based on a Philosopher. True story
GREAT LEGO HARRY POTTER GRINGGOTTS WIZARDING BANKS REVIEW ASHNFLASH EXCELLENT,
Yeah the British always call people “ignorant Americans” when we use the term “sorcerer” idk, in my opinion “philosopher” sounds cooler
Nah I'm American and I say philosopher's stone. That's what it is in the movie and I thought that's what it was in the books, or I might have just got the British version. Anyway, it sounds better and if you say sorcerer's stone you're just wrong.
@@AJFromBatuuit’s not your ignorant. It’s more your speaking English!! American is just your way of saying our language
It’s about time Lego did this
Just got it, so nice🔥🔥🔥
21:45 I think you accidentaly reversed the doorframe while building. Great in depth review 😁
32:44 So Griphook’s face cut is not from Gringotts scene but from the Malfoy Manor scene before when Bellatrix cut his face because she was mad cause he wasn’t sure if the Sword of Gryffindor is forgery or not. Does that mean we are getting the Malfoy Manor set with his face print reused??? I hope so….
I hope so! There was one that was in the works back in the 2010s. So I’d love that!
I really think that the underground section should be a separate set or even done somehow different - I think they needed to put a lot of effort into "construction" side of it and the design effect is nice, but not that crazy good... Gringotts itself from the outside looks beautiful, maybe inside I would like little little more space, but it's really good anyway... The dragon I would also skip if I could - maybe again another set. A lot of thrown into the one set which is making it spectacular for sure, but have the feeling that all separated could have done great job and be more affordable for fans and allow "crazy fans" to have all the sections...
Plus the price, for not much more you are able to have whole Diagon Alley (not mention that historically it was way cheaper) - really difficult to justify and display is another issue because of how tall it is as a whole set
@marcinkaniaburka3422 4800 pieces for £370 is very good in my opinion. Just because the price is high does not mean the price is bad
The new torso prints for the two guards, would work pretty good for my city, since they don't have radios on their belts. Thanks for sharing!
Best set of the year
I absolutely love this and even though it'll hurt my wallet I'm definitely picking this up as soon as I can
If I wasn’t sent this, I would be there Day 1! I love it!
same ive been saving since April
Cool glitch at 31:10 and 31:57
20:00 is the intent to somehow attach the dragon over the front of the building.
edit: Might explain the broken glass around too. Also its ontop on the front of the manuals
Such an impressive set. Really commend Lego for this detailed and quite extensive set
I'm not normally bothered by small missing details or inaccuracies, but that Gringotts sign looks so bad.
This set looks amazing!! Love this review, thank you for sharing! Can’t wait until sept 1st 🤩🥳
Thanks for watching!
@@Ashnflash thank you so much for replying! My favorite RUclipsr just made my whole week, thanks Ash!!
Does the Lego 10217 set part of the Diagon Alley to be connected to the rest of the set?
Diagon Alley remastered done. Gringotts remastered done. How about Knockturn Alley? Would be cool to connect it from the back of Weasley's Wizard Wheezes or Gringotts - have never got a Leaky Cauldron set too!
I need this lego set
I feel like the dragon annoyed at the prise of the set😂
The quill and coins are referencing the old chrome coin pieces. And the Roman numerals translate to the various sets that feature Gringotts
Ahhhh very cool!
This set is amazing! Sadly the worst part for me is the sticker.
Yeah it’s a shame they didn’t make an print for this price
I saw somone fix it by cutting off the inward edges of both of the stickers and it didnt look too bad but its a shame they couldnt just make it a print
Yeah, @CheesyStudios review did just that and it looks really fantastic.
@@tckchez9310 yeah i will definitely be doing that when i get the set
What was that 2003 set that put a baseplate on bricks exactly ?
3 mins ago!nice😎
Hi, do you think it is worth the money???
Maybe you could trim the edges of the stickers on the bank sign
Ya you could for sure
As a LEGO fan, I think the bats need an upgrade, especially with the new spider mold
You put so much time and effort into this review, thank you, I appreciate how thorough you were, Didn’t rush it or anything, recently watched a review by swiftbricks and it was SUPER rushed and missed absolutely everything. Thanks Ash!
Awesome video ashnflash
I personally think they should’ve included the cloak of invisibility
Awesome review!!! (3rd)
Thanks!
@@Ashnflash no problem!
I feel like they should have gone the jabba’s palace route and sold the two sections separately for people who want to display the bank with the rest of diagon alley, since people who would do that would have to have the underground section off to the side somewhere
Yo this set looks Awesome! Great reveiw!
It is awesome! And thanks!
So cool Awesome
NEED!!!!!
Should have been 2 diferent sets couldnt buy simply too big
1st!
This set looks FANTASTIC!
Can’t wait for the combination!
Súper cool LEGO Harry Potter. 🙂😄😊🤗😎👍💯🙏🎉🍕⭐🔥💥💯🏆⚡🎥🎥🍿
Idk but the creature on the fang brush poster kinda looks like the Swooping Evil from Fabtastuc Beats or an Acromantula with those eyes
Great looking set. Too many stickers. 18+ sets should have prints. I would pay more for prints.
Like all white bricks this too will be beige in a couple of years. My 2014 Ecto1 has faded to beige in a room with no windows.
28:31 epic skills getting the brush back in with one finger 🙌
Ahah thank you! One take :P
I can allready tell this set is going to be a must get for fantasy MOC builders part of the fanbase
Hands seems really shaky…. You alright homie?
I have something called “essential tremors”
The First door is an entrance. 😃
I have cut the stickers of GringotTs so there is no gap between them... Scissors: not included in this set.😅😂
Ahaha. I tried to put them as close as possible
An amazing set, very detailed. But... way above what i can afford. Great review by the way
Thank you so much! Hopefully someday you’re able to get your hands on it!
@Ashnflash Is Gringotts compatible with non-diagon alley modulars?
I don’t believe so. Because the original Diagon Alley sets are only half of a baseplate
@@Ashnflash Thank You!
What an awesome review! I was advised to come see it while watching Topic Bricks and Lauren live build of Gringotts and I am soo glad I did! Wonderful review! ❤🎉
How long did it take to build this?
I built it on and off in one day
Am I the only one seeing that dragon head and thinking it looks almost perfect for making Skullcrawlers from Kong Skull Island?
Love your videos mate just realised I wasn’t subscribed so I am now! When you do the prices at the start of the review any chance you can include it in £? Don’t know how easy you can get this info just means us over the pond don’t have to look it up
ugh someone want to send me this set? i really want it but can't afford it lolllll lmao
Harry’s face is not brand new it wasintroduced in the hogwarts express this year
I said “new for this year”
@@Ashnflash oh, my bad i really should be more focused😅
Anyone else find it kinda lazy from Lego to include 2 faces on one head I think when you spend this much on a set you should get 2 facial expressions per character
I think the complete opposite. They could’ve just left the other side blank, or just slightly change the expression. Raise an eyebrow, close a smile etc. I think this is incredible.
Nice pfp BTW 😅
Fabulous in depth review, much appreciated! Enjoy universal studios 😊
awesome video and im pretty sure that the reason the roof pops off like that is for the dragon breaking through.
I think the roof is detachable for the reason that you can play that scene when the dragon comes out.
I love how you go into so much detail for each part. I definitely think this is an amazing set and I think they did it perfectly. Nice job on the video ashnflash!!!
Thank you very much 😊
I know what I santa will bring me
Wow looks fantastic set enjoyed your review ash
Thanks buddy 😊
omg warren I have same pic like you!
we are brother
@@Hether6971 nice
or $630 Australian.....
Excited to see this one! 🍿
Well now we just NEED a Leaky Cauldron set, (That's in London)
I really don’t get how we don’t have one yet
19:10 the Roman numerals are
1: 4714 (Gringott's Bank, 2002)
2: 10217 (Diagon Alley, 2011)
3: 40289 (Diagon Alley, 2018)
4: 70417 (this set.. with a typo?)
LXX (thousands) CDXVII is 70, 417, I suppose the full number should be LXXVI with bars over them, then CDXVII.
Seems like the number 70417 is an unused gap between Pirates III and Hidden Side. idk
Shouldn't the 76,000 be LLXV all with bars over them then M, as M is the Roman numeral for a thousand. 🤔
@@stevored1989 Could be correct either way, the reference I use said they do the whole thousands part, then the hundreds-tens-ones.
This set is incredible
turtle
Im actually amazed by the structural integrity
Ya it’s a very strong build. Which I know a lot of people were concerned about before
31:47 YAAAAS wet Hermione is my favourite Hermione :DDDD
Wth💀
The dragon is bloody awful. Needed to be a moulded piece
Would the second heads for the goblin represent the goblins from the first Harry Potter and the other heads are for the goblins in the deathly hollows?
Horrible set