@@jerry4706yes!! Until folks experience working with cinema/broadcast cameras, they won't understand that all that rigging leads to failure and time that could be used in other areas of production.
You forgot the most important part, the FX6 image is different despite the sensor being the same. The way it processes the information is different. Going back and forth between fx3 and fx6 the fx6 tends to have better deeper shadows and more recoverable highlights.
This is true. I was the AC on the Netflix doc "Sly" about Sylvester Stallone's life, and we shot the whole thing on FX6's with only one interview with Quentin Tarantino on the FX9. That camera is awesome, such a perfect doc cam
From my editing experience when matching the FX3 and FX6 I mostly noticed that the FX3 exaggerates brigtness when compared to the FX6. When recording in SLOG-3 you basically need to turn down the whites on the FX3 or turn them up on the FX6 and then they look basically the same.
Sure it can - but it has anywhere from a 3-5 frame variable delay on that timecode input, so it’s utterly useless. I only run audio timecode when I have the misfortune of encountering an FX3 on set.
Got the FX3 because there’s no way I’d be able to sneak the FX6 into the crowded, run-and-gun shoots I mostly shoot in. I won’t often be syncing multiple cameras, and when I have to I can still sync timecode with the FX3. I’ll miss the internal ND’s but I already have variable ND’s for my lenses. I’ll miss all the extra buttons (a sign of a truly professional camera) but again, I need a small, discreet form factor, something I can keep in a bag, grab quickly for some shots then quickly put away.
Its like comparing a Van with a City Car. It just serves different purposes and therefore isn‘t really compareable. Tbh the FX6 for me is „just“ a low budget version of the FX9, whereas the FX3 is a great run and gun option or traveling option.
yeah, they definitely serve different purposes, but the big thing here is that the final results look so similar, it's just what kind of body do you need. Even the Fx9 footage looks very similar.
I now have both am yet to use the fx6 Love the fx3 it does it all ! A cam B cam gimbal heck I take stills for our digital stories for work I work work a tv station in Australia
The Creator was shot on FX3's with P+S Technik anamorphic PL mount lenses using E-PL lens adapter and recorded via HDMI onto Atomos Ninja RAW recorders. Looks incredible
One thing not mentioned that I’ve learned from owning an FX3 and FX30 is that while you can use an external monitor with them, they’re really not made for it and not the most user friendly.
Год назад+3
aaaaand the internal processing is different. imo i prefer the mp4 container over the mxf container of the fx6 because the fx6 has 8 bit long gop because of that while the fx3 can give you 10 bit long gop of longer periods of shooting, which is nice for a day full of interviews etc
Its also important to notice, that you cannot input any audio into the FX6 if its on a gimbal like the DJI Ronin RS4 Pro. But all the extra buttons and especially the integrated variable ND filter that is not polarizing but electrochromatic (it wont mess with your reflections like screw on VNDs would, which is a gigantic advantage) make it incredible for more run and gun like shooting because you dont have to swap ND filters all the time. If you want a gimbal setup, you might also want to consider getting either an FX3 and a Ronin gimbal or just get a Ronin 4D while you're at it. The 4D will also stabilize your up and down movement, what no other gimbal does enabling you to RUN, while recording but your footage looks like it came from a steadicam. You can put an FX6 on a gimbal but it comes with the disadvantage of not having audio - sure you can record it externally, but it is extra work that you have to do and depending on your workflow, your customers might not like that. Its easier to just import all the footage and have synced audio, that is already kinda mixed but recorded seperately (PFL of each channel and the stereo mix recorded in camera already synced with the footage is the easiest workflow since all the work of syncing is already done before you even start Premiere, Davinci or After Effects). So if you got some time on set to swap NDs - you'd probably want to prefer the FX3. If you might get into situations where things "just happen" like when recording documentaries or news, you are better of with the FX6. But both can do the job of the other.
you can, with RS4 pro FX6 can be balance very well with the audio handle and a dji or rode wireless lav reciever without using any counter weight, I used this setup all the time.
@@disco.jellyfish No problem at all, I can do high to low shots, and its super smooth. I moved the evf to the rear mount on the handle, which helps with balancing and also avoid blocking when using the gimble up side down. Its only possible with RS4 pro tho, I used to have RS2 which is nearly impossible to use with the handle.
I have been using the A1 for video for the past couple of years, mostly shooting stage and studio rehearsal dance performances. Noise in low-light situations was a constant struggle. I recently purchased an FX3 body. It is a game changer! Low-light performance, even at a ridiculously high ISO, is amazing.
My biggest hurdle is the lens.. I keep hearing most cinema lens are made for super 35 and these are full frame. So I don’t want to buy a camera and be limited on the lens options but I no also don’t know if that’s a thing because surprisingly finding it hard to find the information
that's not true anymore. years ago, before full frame cameras were as widely available, you're right that cinema lenses were mostly APS-C. But now, there are hundreds of full frame cinema lenses.
@@chadwin hmmm so then it pretty much Comes down to whether I would want to spend the money or not. Because all things considered, there doesn’t seem to be crazy amount of difference in quality between APS-C and full frame.
Correction: they only have slightly over 12 stops of DR since the sensor is only readout in 12bit mode diring video recording. In photo mode it kicks back up to 14bit, closer to 14 stops
How's the cam in 2024? Considering I currently use an 8yr Nikon D5200 crop sensor and want to shift to the Sony lineup with my first full frame which I m thinking abt buying this year.
@@jatinpopliI still use it. With a couple g master lenses. Looking to upgrade to get 60&120fps 4k but besides that a7iii still looks great. Lenses and lighting are more crucial
@hassan7569 yeah I dod say not just because I'm poor. But also vheep8ng out on the camera also means I can spend more on lenses. Because good lenses are more important then a good camera. Pluss my 24 - 70 is now a 35 - 105 and it's amazing
I think it all comes to the ability to break the rig down to super small components allowing a film-maker to travel light and possible go to locations that wouldn't be possible with a large rig. The Sony FX3 made it's name with The Creator and there's really nothing left to say about it.
Recently had a multicam setup with multiple FX3's and FX6's combined and I have to say, not having timecode in (without adapter) is a huge loss on the FX3.
Could you supply a reliable test that supports the 15+ stops of dynamic range for fx3? Gerald undone and cine D tests do not support this claim. In fact I believe Gerald undone found the Fujifilm xh2s had more dynamic range than fx3 if I'm not mistaken
Also not to mention on the fly it’s better to have built in nd and use a matte box for filters like mist/ etc…. But I’m just a meme channel and I don’t work as a dp on set as my full time job
The struggle for me is … small with IBIS … vs large with that sweet sweet variable ND system. I want the best of both … I know … the Sony Burano can do it all (IBIS + ND + 8K) …for a small fee of $25,000 🙄
Yes! The FX3 with IBIS is perfect for so many things, especially gimbal and quick run and gun work as long as you have a VND. Yeah, That new Burano looks incredible but holy cow 💰 💵
That 15+ DR number is complete BS. Bang that thing on a Xyla 21 and you get 12.4 clean with a SNR of 2, and a max of 13 at SNR 1. You're doing some insane post NR if you're getting above 14 off that sensor.
For image quality, absolutely FX9 or more cinematic bodies. For portability and affordability, absolutely FX30. I don’t use FX3 or FX6 because, I think they offer no real merit. Unless you're shooting in extreme low-light conditions, their image quality doesn’t seem impressive at all.
Neither, they’re both outdated. No open gate, no 6k and no anamorphic modes like Super 35 or 3:2 full frame anamorphics. It’s good some Sony cameras are getting BRAW.
If only the fx3 had internal nd’s. Imagine the fx3 ii comes with internal nds and a global shutter. What a power house that would be. Probably wishing for too much.
Moral of the story, Sony is limiting the capability of their "high end" cameras in order to segment the market. Adding these features are not expensive but as long as the people are willing to pay for it then they will stay in the higher models
On one of my recent projects my dop brought both for an interview situation with proper lighting. FX6 for A Cam, FX3 for B Cam. Both looked really good, however we all had the feeling that the FX6s Image was slightly better. But not enough to justify the higher price. Both are great, but for typical content creators the fx3 seems like the better option while the fx6 is a cheap and very good choice for small professional productions I guess
![Overrated: Camera features that don't matter [ft Gerald Undone]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SlLbkeNH9to/mqdefault.jpg)
![Overrated: Camera features that don't matter [ft Gerald Undone]](/img/tr.png)
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
What would you use: Sony FX3 or Sony FX6?
Venis
Burano
FX6 ❤
Both
FX3 for tight spaces, FX6 for quick shoulder rigging
I’ll just take a couple FX3’s and rig them out as big or small as I want for the given scene 👌🏻
That’s a good plan. The FX3 is so fun to rig out and you can always break it down for light gimbal work when you need to
@@chadwinand creator was shot on it 😂. Thats my big excuse
Not worth time of rigging out. Form factor of fx6 plus built in NDs wins
Folks don't realize, the fx6 actually isn't that much larger or heavier than the fx3.
@@jerry4706yes!! Until folks experience working with cinema/broadcast cameras, they won't understand that all that rigging leads to failure and time that could be used in other areas of production.
You can get control handles for the fx3... And you can save preset white balances with the custom white balance options...
That’s true, some handles have R/S via USB. And I just found out you could save custom WB presets 😂 I was late to the game on that revelation
You can also stabilise fx6 footage using catalyst browse
I didn’t know about presets being set and saved on the FX3
@@MegaIrgendetwasonly if shooting on certain stills lenses - doesn’t work with manual lenses at all unfortunately.
They’re both extremely useful for different situations
You forgot the most important part, the FX6 image is different despite the sensor being the same. The way it processes the information is different. Going back and forth between fx3 and fx6 the fx6 tends to have better deeper shadows and more recoverable highlights.
It was what I thought too.
I could be wrong but that'd be thanks to the full XAVC format rather than XAVC S AND HS?
This is true. I was the AC on the Netflix doc "Sly" about Sylvester Stallone's life, and we shot the whole thing on FX6's with only one interview with Quentin Tarantino on the FX9. That camera is awesome, such a perfect doc cam
From my editing experience when matching the FX3 and FX6 I mostly noticed that the FX3 exaggerates brigtness when compared to the FX6.
When recording in SLOG-3 you basically need to turn down the whites on the FX3 or turn them up on the FX6 and then they look basically the same.
So better dynamic range
I have the FX30 and I love it! Not a full frame sensor but still gets me amazing results.
The FX3 has a full frame sensor. How was the workflow on the FX 30?
@@WOZCINEMA I use full frame lenses that I use on my A7IV. The image gets cropped on the FX30 (zoomed in 1.5 times) that's the only difference.
*forgets to mention that the FX3 can accept timecode-in via an adapter that connects to the camera's Multi-in port*
Sure it can - but it has anywhere from a 3-5 frame variable delay on that timecode input, so it’s utterly useless. I only run audio timecode when I have the misfortune of encountering an FX3 on set.
FX9 is long overdue for an update.
FX60 should be no surprise.
That a9 sensor still has lots of video potential.
What kinda potential
@@tysonchickennuggets uncropped downsampled 4k60p, low rolling shutter, at a affordable cost due to economy of scale
@@frankfeng2701low rolling shutter? No there is no any rolling shutter mate. It has a global shutter sensor.
@@OUCGN I'm obviously talking about the original a9, not a9iii duh.
For something as expensive as fx9 l, it better have a comparable or a better sensor than the a1.
Got the FX3 because there’s no way I’d be able to sneak the FX6 into the crowded, run-and-gun shoots I mostly shoot in. I won’t often be syncing multiple cameras, and when I have to I can still sync timecode with the FX3. I’ll miss the internal ND’s but I already have variable ND’s for my lenses. I’ll miss all the extra buttons (a sign of a truly professional camera) but again, I need a small, discreet form factor, something I can keep in a bag, grab quickly for some shots then quickly put away.
Why not the A1
@@J_blox much worse rolling shutter, worse base ISO
After working with both, I'd take the FX3 for personal shots but the FX6 for big budget work
I’m really looking forward to seeing the new a9 global shutter coming to this cinema lineup. I will go with whichever camera gets the global shutter
Yes!! That would be awesome if they add global shutter to the next generations of these cameras
FX9ii would most likely be the first to get this 24MP GS sensor.
I hope we get a S35 one… else my next cam will be a Red
What's global shutter
Its like comparing a Van with a City Car. It just serves different purposes and therefore isn‘t really compareable. Tbh the FX6 for me is „just“ a low budget version of the FX9, whereas the FX3 is a great run and gun option or traveling option.
yeah, they definitely serve different purposes, but the big thing here is that the final results look so similar, it's just what kind of body do you need. Even the Fx9 footage looks very similar.
Just bought my fx30. I love it. ❤️❤️
I love mine!
You can add variable nd to FX3 but you cannot add IBIS to FX6
But the internal variable ND inside the fx6 is soooo convenient
I think arguably, if you're dropping $10k on a cinema camera, you'll probably have a gimbal or more for it
IBIS doesn't mean gimbal quality. Because of the economics and weight distribution of the fx6, it's easier to get stable footage.
But you can still do stabilization on the F6 in post with the gyro data. Which works better when IBIS turned off.
what are you talking about?
I have a side handle with a focus wheel and a run/stop button for my FX30.
Bro honestly I'm lowkey jealous tho
The fx30 also down samples from 6k its a lovely camera
I now have both am yet to use the fx6
Love the fx3 it does it all ! A cam B cam gimbal heck I take stills for our digital stories for work
I work work a tv station in Australia
that's awesome! both really great cameras!
The Creator was shot on FX3's with P+S Technik anamorphic PL mount lenses using E-PL lens adapter and recorded via HDMI onto Atomos Ninja RAW recorders. Looks incredible
One thing not mentioned that I’ve learned from owning an FX3 and FX30 is that while you can use an external monitor with them, they’re really not made for it and not the most user friendly.
aaaaand the internal processing is different. imo i prefer the mp4 container over the mxf container of the fx6 because the fx6 has 8 bit long gop because of that while the fx3 can give you 10 bit long gop of longer periods of shooting, which is nice for a day full of interviews etc
Love the video! Great job on this!!!
thanks!
I’ve used fx6 in a project. İt has really cinematic image and view, awesome..
I have the FX6 and I love it. ❤❤❤
such a great camera!
Its also important to notice, that you cannot input any audio into the FX6 if its on a gimbal like the DJI Ronin RS4 Pro.
But all the extra buttons and especially the integrated variable ND filter that is not polarizing but electrochromatic (it wont mess with your reflections like screw on VNDs would, which is a gigantic advantage) make it incredible for more run and gun like shooting because you dont have to swap ND filters all the time.
If you want a gimbal setup, you might also want to consider getting either an FX3 and a Ronin gimbal or just get a Ronin 4D while you're at it. The 4D will also stabilize your up and down movement, what no other gimbal does enabling you to RUN, while recording but your footage looks like it came from a steadicam.
You can put an FX6 on a gimbal but it comes with the disadvantage of not having audio - sure you can record it externally, but it is extra work that you have to do and depending on your workflow, your customers might not like that. Its easier to just import all the footage and have synced audio, that is already kinda mixed but recorded seperately (PFL of each channel and the stereo mix recorded in camera already synced with the footage is the easiest workflow since all the work of syncing is already done before you even start Premiere, Davinci or After Effects).
So if you got some time on set to swap NDs - you'd probably want to prefer the FX3. If you might get into situations where things "just happen" like when recording documentaries or news, you are better of with the FX6. But both can do the job of the other.
Yeah, these are all really great points! thanks for the detailed response here. I def think the FX3 and FX6 each have their place and best use cases.
you can, with RS4 pro FX6 can be balance very well with the audio handle and a dji or rode wireless lav reciever without using any counter weight, I used this setup all the time.
@@qiyuxuan9437 Okay, hold the gimbal upside down for a low shot and say that again.
@@disco.jellyfish No problem at all, I can do high to low shots, and its super smooth. I moved the evf to the rear mount on the handle, which helps with balancing and also avoid blocking when using the gimble up side down. Its only possible with RS4 pro tho, I used to have RS2 which is nearly impossible to use with the handle.
@@qiyuxuan9437 I assumed that you'd need to move the VF but I dont see how that handle is supposed to fit even on that bigger gimbal.
Fx3 supports V mount as well with a cage I thought?
Yeah, you can technically add a v-mount battery to any camera!
I have been using the A1 for video for the past couple of years, mostly shooting stage and studio rehearsal dance performances. Noise in low-light situations was a constant struggle. I recently purchased an FX3 body. It is a game changer! Low-light performance, even at a ridiculously high ISO, is amazing.
My biggest hurdle is the lens.. I keep hearing most cinema lens are made for super 35 and these are full frame. So I don’t want to buy a camera and be limited on the lens options but I no also don’t know if that’s a thing because surprisingly finding it hard to find the information
that's not true anymore. years ago, before full frame cameras were as widely available, you're right that cinema lenses were mostly APS-C. But now, there are hundreds of full frame cinema lenses.
@@chadwin hmmm so then it pretty much Comes down to whether I would want to spend the money or not. Because all things considered, there doesn’t seem to be crazy amount of difference in quality between APS-C and full frame.
Correction: they only have slightly over 12 stops of DR since the sensor is only readout in 12bit mode diring video recording. In photo mode it kicks back up to 14bit, closer to 14 stops
Good to know, thanks!
The Fx3 does have Timecode in! You need a special Sony cable to Connect to the multi input.
When are they releasing the next gen FX6? It's been out for quite few years now. I feel like they'll release something in 24'
Me with A7III 👀
Same, those a7siii:s never seem to come down in price. Plus i want a gh6 for the stabilization.
How's the cam in 2024?
Considering I currently use an 8yr Nikon D5200 crop sensor and want to shift to the Sony lineup with my first full frame which I m thinking abt buying this year.
@@jatinpopliI still use it. With a couple g master lenses. Looking to upgrade to get 60&120fps 4k but besides that a7iii still looks great. Lenses and lighting are more crucial
Same lmao
@@candyhabits1826i used the A7iii for a whole 1.5years and honestly the 4K 60 10bit is so worth it (upgrade)
The FX3 has the Grip build in and can run on usb-c pd until the card fills up
true! the FX3 is a powerful little beast!
You can save presets on the fx3
you're totally right!
I choose both!
I chose the fx30, not just cuzz I'm pour but also the 6k downscaled sensor. And supper 35 instead of fullfram
sounds like you were just too poor to afford the clearly better fx6
@hassan7569 yeah I dod say not just because I'm poor. But also vheep8ng out on the camera also means I can spend more on lenses. Because good lenses are more important then a good camera. Pluss my 24 - 70 is now a 35 - 105 and it's amazing
Depending on the project one or the other they are different tools for different jobs
I think it all comes to the ability to break the rig down to super small components allowing a film-maker to travel light and possible go to locations that wouldn't be possible with a large rig. The Sony FX3 made it's name with The Creator and there's really nothing left to say about it.
yeah that's true. being able to break the rig down really small and compact is great for travel and run and gun filmmaking. The Creator was awesome!!
Recently had a multicam setup with multiple FX3's and FX6's combined and I have to say, not having timecode in (without adapter) is a huge loss on the FX3.
What about cache recording?
the top and side handles are extra products.. and there are side handles with controlls
I love stabilization so I would go for FX3
I have both and they are both a little difficult to master
I have a7s3 & fx6 and if I was to start over I’d go with fx3 hands down. Internal NDs are overrated. Inbody IS on the other hand is so useful 🙏
picking and choosing a bit.....
Could you supply a reliable test that supports the 15+ stops of dynamic range for fx3? Gerald undone and cine D tests do not support this claim. In fact I believe Gerald undone found the Fujifilm xh2s had more dynamic range than fx3 if I'm not mistaken
Also not to mention on the fly it’s better to have built in nd and use a matte box for filters like mist/ etc…. But I’m just a meme channel and I don’t work as a dp on set as my full time job
Can you make FX6 to play a sound when you start/stop recording?
Use the right tool for the job.
FX3 has timecode input.
That’s true with a usb adapter!
@@chadwin.....or dedicated cable such as the deity one.
Also the sensor in the fx6 looks better like less sharp but in a good way
But in fact you can save pre-sets on the FX3, no? 😮
you're right--you can save some presets on the FX3, but it's not quite the same
They say 15+ stops but they're not all useable , useable would be 12-13
Fx6 is a filmmaker type fx3 is a low profile both can be use for run and gun so on.
If you were shooting handheld, the FX3 is the way to go. Specifically for weight but mostly the built-in stabilization is insane.
I need both, I can’t move with a fx6 like I can with an fx3
I use both of them - so no need for a decision 🤗
So the FX3 needs more rigging, but the FX6 is more suitable for rigging?
I have the FX6 and to this day I don't understand why it doesn't have internal stabilization
Fx3 and Fx6 Both Camera Best One For Vloging Purpose Anna..
The struggle for me is … small with IBIS … vs large with that sweet sweet variable ND system. I want the best of both … I know … the Sony Burano can do it all
(IBIS + ND + 8K) …for a small fee of $25,000 🙄
Yes! The FX3 with IBIS is perfect for so many things, especially gimbal and quick run and gun work as long as you have a VND.
Yeah, That new Burano looks incredible but holy cow 💰 💵
And the option not to use the god forsaken hdmi and use sweet sweet SDI
$36,000 for the Burano here in Norway.
Not actually full frame though, 17:9 crop of the full sensor. Get a blackmagic for true full frame!
Most people watching this don't really want a legitimate cinema camera, but a high-end video camera with autofocus.
Kinda like the fx30. But i also love apsc and super 35 😊
So which one should I buy to take cat photos
FX3. The FX6 is for the serious movie maker.
I own both and they are both great.
I'd Sony ever added internal NDs to a memories camera, that would be such a game changer
Doesn't the Sony fx6 have a 10.2mp sensor?
It’s 12 MP, with 10.2 MP effective
LOVING my FX3.
Fx6 or fx3 for movies ,commercials ?
Ok great! Could you send me the FX3 now that your done filming the video? Thanks!
I want the FX9 for Paranormal Ghost Hunting because people always have potato cameras when they “caught” something.
Fx3 is fine for me.... Ready to go cinema camera📷
I would buy an fx6.. but I'm currently just happy with my a6400
What is that matte box?
I'm using the PolarPro Basecamp mattebox
If NDs are basically required for video, why don't all cameras made for video include them? It's like a necessity.
That 15+ DR number is complete BS. Bang that thing on a Xyla 21 and you get 12.4 clean with a SNR of 2, and a max of 13 at SNR 1. You're doing some insane post NR if you're getting above 14 off that sensor.
I was hunting for this response.
I would love an fx3
A person who hasn’t use the fx6 before doesn’t know that the fx3 isn’t the same as the fx6. Image quality of the fx6 highlight roll is 👍
Great video
thanks!
Electric VND is a killer function.
Show up to meeting with a client with the FX6 in hand… you basically got the gig.
Those prices hit different
14.7 stops dynamic range, that's why you should be precise, other wise you look smart.
Thank you for the review. I’ll buy BMPC 6k fullframe than
Anyone have any recommendations for a camcorder around $100? I'm lost in the amount of camcorders for sale.
You’re better off using your phone at that price, you can get something decent used from $500 and up
@_Jame thank you
I’m about to have both 😭
I wish So y would release whatever new camera is on the horizon before I buy a fx6😂. I need built in ND otherwise id grab an fx3
FX3 better for lightweight mounting options on sliders / motorized gimbals ect.
Blackmagic insane but without out focus and low light....staters fx3 good to go
depends how much?
Great comparison
I chose the fx3 for versatility
For image quality, absolutely FX9 or more cinematic bodies. For portability and affordability, absolutely FX30. I don’t use FX3 or FX6 because, I think they offer no real merit. Unless you're shooting in extreme low-light conditions, their image quality doesn’t seem impressive at all.
I'm really looking forward to an AI update to vastly and greatly improved my Eos 1300D
It's same price?
U forgot FX3 has an audio jack without the top handle 😬😬
We own and love them both!!! =)
FX3 has been such a good investment ❤
It’s my favorite small mirrorless camera of all time
FX3 is above and beyond for me.
Neither, they’re both outdated. No open gate, no 6k and no anamorphic modes like Super 35 or 3:2 full frame anamorphics.
It’s good some Sony cameras are getting BRAW.
If only the fx3 had internal nd’s. Imagine the fx3 ii comes with internal nds and a global shutter. What a power house that would be. Probably wishing for too much.
Moral of the story, Sony is limiting the capability of their "high end" cameras in order to segment the market. Adding these features are not expensive but as long as the people are willing to pay for it then they will stay in the higher models
On one of my recent projects my dop brought both for an interview situation with proper lighting. FX6 for A Cam, FX3 for B Cam. Both looked really good, however we all had the feeling that the FX6s Image was slightly better. But not enough to justify the higher price.
Both are great, but for typical content creators the fx3 seems like the better option while the fx6 is a cheap and very good choice for small professional productions I guess