Printing a Problem
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 окт 2024
- The plaintiff hired the defendant to print logos on hundreds of shirts. He says the defendant botched the job and printed the wrong logo on all the apparel. The plaintiff had to pay for new shirts out of pocket, so he’s suing for his money back. The defendant argues he’s been in business for years and isn’t at fault.
Subscribe to our channel:
/ @peoplescourttv
Case # 28-424
#PeoplesCourt #RealityTV #Court 
Развлечения
I was in the commercial printing industry for almost 50 years. I don't care how good technology gets, you treat artwork like it's dynamite. You get signed proofs in every way possible. On paper and electronically.
Yes. This was a PE--printer error. And why the printer *always* sends a proof and waits. Nothing moves without a signature and explicit approval.
So it doesn't really matter it's just a drop in the bucket but you went through all this instead of just taking the L
LOL Why in the world would the defendant go on TV knowing his company was about to get embarrassed? Does he think bad publicity is better than no publicity?
That’s why he only wanted his first name used and didn’t want his busy name said. lol
When she said “Go tell your uncle how well you did here today.” I was so happy.
I like judge so much and watch so often, I'm starting to express myself like her - I'm done, I'm done, Check please", LMAO
i hate when people are like i’ve been in business for x amount of years like no one cares…mistakes happen its how u handle the mistake and how often they happen
I just want to know what the defendant’s defense was. Like seriously, everyone makes mistakes. But when you make a mistake, you have to make right by it. This never needed to go to court.
My old job included ordering items with specific logos on it and the amount of emails back and forth to make sure it was placed and printed exactly like we wanted was annoying at the time. Now watching this I'm so glad the printing company asked so many questions. The drop in the bucket was just rude and if it was so little he should have paid quickly.
The defendant should be embarrassed.😂
I worked at a printing company before and we always had sign off approvals with signature before any production proceeds and for this company to just (non-shalantly) "ehh pur business is doing good so this is just a drop in the bucket, is a poor way of doing business. How they managed to run like that for 30 years is beyond me.
This defendant would NOT take responsibility for anything...even with the evidence staring him in the face. I could not do business with him for long.
I've never heard of a printer not getting a signed proof, before going ahead with the order...
If it doesn't matter how come he didn't paid him before going to court?
Exactly
Probably used to getting his way all the time.
Either that is just a drop in the bucket and he’s a terrible business man, or it’s not a drop in the bucket and he’s a terrible business man.
My thoughts exactly. Everyone makes mistakes, admit it and learn from it.
Yay!! A case I’ve never seen before!! 🎉
Now everyone who places smaller orders with this company knows, that they “don’t really matter.”
Good job judge ... If the defendant was wrong why couldn't he just admit it .
I wish Doug had asked him “If the amount is trivial, what’s the value of looking like an ass on national TV?”
He was way too easy on him.
Defendant after losing: “It’s a drop in the bucket. It doesn’t really matter”. Then why didn’t you just reprint the shirts at the start and save all the hassle? 🤨 🤦♂️
From Defendant's first statement he is toast..
Being asked to approach the bench, just to be repulsed and told to GO, GO BACK TO YOUR PLACE. Gotta love JM
"drop in the bucket" but I am going to fight you tooth and nail in court and make a fool of myself.
With the wife owning a promotional business that is mainly busy with screen printing and embroidery, I've had the pleasure of being the screen printer for a few years now and love watching these t-shirt cases!! The first thing you do is write up an art approval with the exact graphic being printed, there is a review option and we STRONGLY encourage you to go over every detail with or without us and double check what you see is what you want! There can be a problem with matching colors since computer colors and real ink colors are not an exact match at times. Regardless we give a qote, art approval, and my butt won't let a bad print go out the door EVER!! I get in trouble with being too much of a perfectionist, 😉. If you're ever in need SHIRTSMITH, Jefferson City, Mo!! We got your back!!
Abby is getting fired!! 🫣🥴
The defendant needs to get fired. That's no way to run a business.
She's the only judge who just lets the litigants approach the bench/comes over to them herself.🤣🤣🤣
what a crappy businessman; wish we knew what his company is called. All the worst Ted.
The defendant said he had no signature approval for the revised proof. That simply wasn't true.
Abby, you're fired! 😂
wjy ios it sooo hard for people to just say they made a damn mistake...... a drop in the bucket? I would say incompetence.
Right but admitting it isn’t the thing, it’s having morality about the situation and rectifying it that’s important!
It's everywhere. From local businesses to government agencies. A person sitting in jail for years found out their innocent but the justice system doesn't release them instantly, it takes months and a act of God to get them released.
Just a drop in the bucket. We just like wasting everyone's time.
Printing guy looked ready to cry lol
Well the defendant really doesn't care because it's the show the one that pays the plaintiff so he really didn't lose any money he gained money
Exactly and I have pointed this out for years..
Don’t they have to pay the show back ?
@@britanyvonhall505 No.
@@britanyvonhall505 I don't think so. My understanding of the deal, thanks to some Chat GPT research last year 😂, is that TPC pays the plaintiff and each side gets a $250 show appearance fee.
Gotta add that being able to print the nfl, and official logos is a matter of paying for the ability to print them not that you're such high quality that you alone have earned the right or privilege to do so!
I worked for a print shop and we messed lots.
Then the new policy nothing gets done until
it has been signed for approval.
That was quick. Easy, peasy, lemon squeezy.
A drop in the bucket… but you’d much rather get sued???
If it's just a drop in the bucket, then why didn't you give him his money? You knew it was your fault? Ego!
Judge interrupts so much. Its annoying AF. Sometimes I think its better if she didn't have all the facts upfront. She ask a question then answers for them. Why not just go over the case and mail them a verdict 🙄
agreed
It would kill the defendant admit fault.. He said they tried everything to make it right If they did they wouldn't have had to go to court. They could adjust it by hey drop off the wrong shirts I'll make you the right shirts and boom done just like that. The defendant was just trying to rip off the plaintiff.
Whad defendant say to Doug abt plaintiff missing something shoulda brought that up during case. I’m glad he lost.
Check the fine print. The 84 stayed the same, but then they changed those tiny tiny letters it looks like, from the sales agent to print was a mistake, this is why I don't do rush jobs personally. These things happens.😂
defendant is running a sloppy business and is dishonest to boot. Everyone knows you get a proof and sign off. Come on! I feel badly for Abby because she was likely dismissed. The defendant knew he was wrong and should have made the order right for the plaintiff. The plaintiff had all his ducks in a row and did a great job of documenting his communications and keeping good records unlike the dishonest defendant.
Why didn't Doug ask the plaintiff what the defendant meant when he said he would meet up with him to fix the issue?
Pippi Longstocking is giving everyone the eye of judgement.
The defendant is a jerk. Hate to work for him.........
who thought the purple eyeshadow was ok? OFF WITH THEIR HEAD! LOL
Who got the tee shirts
People lose a case and still try to justify their dumb ass position
The couple in "Pretty Woman" would have broken up after two or three days together.
like big mistake, huge!
They weren't a couple until their contract ended. So the relationship didn't even start until after the credits. Up until that part, they are business partners.
This was an easy case lol fair judgement
I hate when Harvey names the case after pc already named it during the intro! 😠
The defendant reminds me of Trump.
Great prep work and presentation by the Plaintiff.
All fat white rich guys look alike I guess
DId anyone else notice that @3:31 the guy behind the defendant sniffs something very SUSPECT and then gets all crazy eyed slowly through the rest of the video? If not, and you just found out then enjoy.
Idk kinda looks like he is just biting his nails
He picked his nose, d__ummy.
If she shut up and stop interrupting we might can understand litigants the first time.
The guy at 3:30 forgot he was on camera
lmfao!!! was he smelling his finger???
He was biting his nail
Defendant has lived his entire life entitled and with privilege.
Is that his fault? Should he give away all his money and go live in the projects to earn respect? Would you?
@@TopherGrant I think we found another one of Adrian's alt accts lol
🚫Accountability
@@TopherGrant Are you triggered. Its no insult to say that something is the thing it is.
@@Meister_de_Nicts haha! Birds of a feather whine together
Milian is always so eager to please and respectful when it's a case involving what she perseves as professional people. Completely the opposite when dealing with others. Completely different. She even called the plaintiff sweetheart for goodness sake.
Maybe because the Plaintiff was straight to the point, she wasn't so kind to the defendant because he was doing what so many litigants do, dodging the questions.
Attention seeking troll 🧌
Yeah, because exactly what you said, they were professional and respectful, and the plantiff had their proof. Give the same attitude you're given.
If the plaintiff were BLACK he would have lost and she probably would have awarded the defendant more money!
It's probably easier for her to be respectful when people are respectful to her and present their cases with ease and without her having to beg for every piece of evidence. What she perceives has little to do with it. Litigants should come dressed for court in proper clothing, not club wear or street wear as litigants often do. These guys are obviously businessmen, so they have suits they can don for court. They dressed appropriately. Good for them. Either way, one side is going to lose. She's a good judge, she'll make the right call based on the law and facts, not on what they're wearing.
JM can be so condescending and sexist at times, calling the male plaintiff sweetheart and telling him to GO, GO GO BACK TO YOUR PLACE. Also, she constantly talks crap about her family, especially her husband.
Calm down Matt. We already have an Adrian. The position of racist cry-baby has been filled.
No, she doesn't. But I'm pretty sure you wish you had a husband. 😂
defendant really screwed up
Drop in the bucket we are fine. As a customer that take me you don’t gaf and have no problem screwing people.