I'm very lucky to have recently bought brand new BB58 Black/Gilt and the Navy Blue versions. In fact I bought the blue first in early Nov 21 and I'm so delighted with it, but I still hankered for the black for its warmer, more vintage personality and I picked it up one last week in late Dec 21. Both are stunning and while identical in specs etc, they do have very different characters. They now share wrist time with one another and my classic 2002 Rolex 16610 Submariner Date - which is still the king IMHO before anyone asks. But you cannot argue with the Tudor BB58's sheer quality, accuracy and overall class at barely 40% of a current steel Sub's retail price - if you could actually get one that is! Not so sure about the all-black ceramic version yet.
Congrats there Andy Williams. Agree with you there. The Tudor definitely punches above it's weight. I like how the BB58 Blue has that thin case profile. The Ceramic just give a very different feel for a different occasion...rugged style. Most importantly, they are so much more less expensive than a Rolex. Don't know if it will be like that forever though....😅
The unique thing about this watch it's unlike any other Tudor, Rolex etc. Ever made... First of it's kind design so it's METAS cert is fitting... Also ceramic is better at resisting changes in temperature.
I'm very lucky to have recently bought brand new BB58 Black/Gilt and the Navy Blue versions. In fact I bought the blue first in early Nov 21 and I'm so delighted with it, but I still hankered for the black for its warmer, more vintage personality and I picked it up one last week in late Dec 21. Both are stunning and while identical in specs etc, they do have very different characters. They now share wrist time with one another and my classic 2002 Rolex 16610 Submariner Date - which is still the king IMHO before anyone asks. But you cannot argue with the Tudor BB58's sheer quality, accuracy and overall class at barely 40% of a current steel Sub's retail price - if you could actually get one that is! Not so sure about the all-black ceramic version yet.
Congrats there Andy Williams. Agree with you there. The Tudor definitely punches above it's weight. I like how the BB58 Blue has that thin case profile. The Ceramic just give a very different feel for a different occasion...rugged style. Most importantly, they are so much more less expensive than a Rolex. Don't know if it will be like that forever though....😅
Is a beautiful unique watch, I only wish they had also a ceramic bracelet option.
A ceramic bracelet option would be dope.
The unique thing about this watch it's unlike any other Tudor, Rolex etc. Ever made...
First of it's kind design so it's METAS cert is fitting...
Also ceramic is better at resisting changes in temperature.
Tudor "Dark Vader"
Bro, sorry but of cause one of the keepers is going to be a little wider the band tapers no
It looks better than bb58
personally i still prefer the black bay. maybe someone with a bigger wrist will be able to pull this off nicely.
Hahaha...which black bay are you referring to? Both also black bay....
@@watchat888 i believe its the bb58?
the price of this watch
presenter need more sun tanning to keep up with black bay watch coolness :)
😂Got it mate. Couldn't pull it off if I wanted to. It's a genetic defect 🤣
need a ceramic bracelet...
Get a Rado
Looks a bit basic...
It's a time only watch. Which do you find basic? The blue or black?