Bryan Kohberger's Fiery Hearing, "Not TODAY Judge!"
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 апр 2024
- Watch the full stream: ruclips.net/user/liveoHn513XsKZ8
Bryan Kohberger had a hearing on potential juror surveys. The hearing escalated quickly as the lawyers and witness felt very strongly about their positions. The TikTok Psychic was mentioned by the survey expert, Bryan Edelman, as part of misinformation that is floating around about the case. A video of the prosecutor, Bill, was used as an example of disseminating information. Bill accused Edelman of tainting the jury pool and Edelman said he was so angry it made him cry. The judge didn't make a ruling but did push back the Change the Venue Hearing to June 27, 2024 and kept the May 14, 2024 Hearing to go over a Motion to Compel.
STAY IN THE LOOP WITH EMILY D. BAKER
Download Our FREE App: lawnerdapp.com
Get the Free Email Alert: www.LawNerdAlert.com
Join the community for exclusive content: www.LawNerdsUnite.com
Case Requests & Business Inquiries: emilydbaker@cesddigital.com
Help with the shop: help@emilydbaker.com
Mailing Address: Emily D. Baker 2000 Mallory Ln. St. 130-185, Franklin Tn 37067
LAW NERD MERCH!
www.LawNerdShop.com
LONG FORM CONTENT / @theemilydbaker
The Emily Show Podcast on RUclips: emilydbaker.com/TheEmilyShowP...
Apple Podcasts: emilydbaker.com/AppleTheEmily...
Spotify Podcasts: emilydbaker.com/SpofityTheEmi...
On your favorite podcast player Wednesdays
QUICK CONTENT?
Quick Bits Podcast: emilydbaker.com/quickbitsplay...
Apple Podcasts: emilydbaker.com/AppleQuickBits
Spotify Podcasts: emilydbaker.com/SpotifyQuickBits
Quick Bits Channel: / @emilydbakerquickbits
EMILY ON SOCIAL @TheEmilyDBaker
Instagram: / theemilydbaker
Twitter: / theemilydbaker
Facebook: / theemilydbaker
MY RUclips TOOLS
**My Favorite RUclips TOOL VidIQ vidiq.com/LawNerd
WHAT I USE TO STREAM: www.emilydbaker.com/streamyard
Follow My Cats on Instagram:
/ fredandgeorge_cat
Emily’s glasses lenses are Irlen tint www.irlen.com
This video is not legal advice; it is commentary for educational and entertainment purposes. Some links shared are affiliate links, all sponsorships are stated in video. Videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise stated. Sharing a resource is not an endorsement; it is a resource. Copyright 2020-2023 Baker Media, LLC 
Развлечения
Judge Judge has forgotten he is the judge, not a spectator.
Judge Judge’s behavior concerns me a whole lot
If all they did was ask about things that came from the media, then how could that be violating the non-dissemination order? Makes no sense.
i believe it’s because the judge defines “public information” as information that is revealed in the legal documents from the court. neither the prosecution nor defense have filed anything that accuses kohlberger of stalking, only the media has made those allegations. the media’s allegations aren’t “public information” under the judge’s interpretation, thus the non-dissemination order was violated. like in most legal disputes, the definition of a word is the crux of the issue.
And it's the way the questions were structured in a bias way.
@@disco.heaventhe judge cannot be considering only the public record. False narratives and speculations shared in the media are even more dangerous when it comes to fainting the jury pool. I am in complete shock
@@vikkideanegomezwere they? How do?
The funny thing is that they actually got santa to admit that bk never stalked any of the victims
You are literally THE BEST at explaining law things to us laymen. Thank you!
This case is getting wild as heck. I can't wait for the trial to get started.
it is never going to happen apparently
It was presented as an open an shut case by the prosecutor but the more we learn about it, it seems they do not have a single shred of evidence.
@@ingeborgsvensson4896 the entire story is desperately been forgotten by the national media you really have to search for updates. They knocked down the house where the murders happened. Why? Why aren’t they treating this like a normal slaying? What makes it so different
Bill is so unprofessional
I'm with the defense on this one. After hearing from the expert, I'm satisfied with his scientific method.
The Defense also pointed out Bill Thompson was misleading the media.
@@lindarobinson8827 The media misleads itself. They are not a source of anything but allegations and shade, frankly.
100%
'Go ahead and be as angry as you want" Passive aggressive much?
Bill Thompson just admitted that BK didn’t stalk the victims, contradicting everything said about the case since the arrest. It will be interesting if this case goes to trial.
I think that the judge didn't expect the expert clear, well founded explanation and had to think about it.
I’m sure the Judge always expects clear precise well thought out explanations for what anyone is doing in his courtroom.
I tried to listen to all of the court hearing. Judge Judge got on my nerves and I had to stop listening. I appreciate the quick bits.
Is that because he still hasn't ruled? I was shocked when they left this hearing with no decision.
The Judge got you mad? How about the defense lawyers?
@@kgrachjudges are held to a higher standard because they are referees, the defense is supposed to be an zealous advocate for their client which entails doing literally everything they possibly can to ensure their client’s constitutional rights are protected. you might not like AT but she’s doing her job, the judge is not. he needs to schedule the damn hearing already!
@@disco.heaventhey are actually allowed to have feelings, crazy right? Judges are humans! They can’t just schedule the trial when the defense is filing a bunch of motions that create delays. This trial will take place when all the details are hammered out and not a minute before that.
The attorneys sound like asses that probably wasn’t cool with the Judge…nor should it be.
I grew up in a town 1 square mile in NJ, graduated high school with apx 38 others. There are very little secrets. If i messed up in school, my mom usually found out at the grocery store or local bank that same week.
This case should be moved.
Thank you for putting out this separate video on this. This is gonna be a wild one.
The problem with the news is that in today’s world we get news everywhere through lots of media. There’s no real place to go to get away from it. So if if people people have heard it in Moscow, they will also know it in Rooster Rock, Idaho. You can’t find a place that wouldn’t know.
Everyone in America knows about this case! This was national news for weeks!
And then there are folks that don’t watch news. I’ve a friend in Pullman and she knows nothing about it
Latah County has 39,876 residents 1/4 are either under 18 or over 65 and we can subtract out police, court staff, medical personnel (because real communities are whoafully understaffed) and educators with two colleges as well as primary and secondary schools (once again substitute teachers are in short supply), how pray tell will they find enough unbiased citizens to fill a jury and alternates? If they hold the trial in the summer another good portion of eligible adults from the 11,000 college students will have gone home. With only three counties having populations over 100,000would it seem wiser to reserve a court room in one before they start jury selection?
@gothgammyboo I think law and crime individuals know about it….but lots of people don’t follow this kind of news. None of my friends or family know about this case (California). I’d probably have to keep adding details about it to jog their memory, if it even gets jogged at all. Most people in my life don’t even know about it. Maybe one coworker who is into true crime?
I think it would be possible to find a jury but I agree with the defense that in can’t be in Moscow and the county
So sick of Brian Hoeburger already. 🤢🤮
The questions don't consist of anything the public doesn't already know (media, social media, reports).
Exactly. I don’t see the issue, especially since the objection from the prosecution had made it clear these types of polls are matter of standard practice
I originally had an issue with it because of some of the false questions. But that is what they have to prove for a change of venue. So the expert got me on his side with this one. Also he was willing to tweak the intro to indicate some of these things I ask may be true or untrue. That is only issue I had. Move on and let them do their work.
Will we be getting "not today, judge" merch?
When I heard that statement yesterday, I immediately thought how on-brand that exclamation and sound bite was for EDB merch.
😊PLEASE PLEASE, WE NEED THIS MERCH... Great idea
😂😂😂
Santa says “not today Judge” Judge😂
Oh we may need it....
Albeit in a lawyerly way, the fur is flying on this day.
The fur was for sure flying.
Santa should have had his own expert witness.
"NOT TODAY JUDGE" Definitely new merch!!!🎉
Love your insight on this. You are such a pretty breath of fresh air in all this confusing banter! Thanks!
Circus. SMH
What are the odds that rhe prosecutor will be removed from the case?
wtf? not today judge wow oh wow
A county with only 30,000 adults who could possibly sit on a jury and the existing survey showing 80% of those having extensive knowledge and strong opinions about the case would argue for a change of venue to one of the three Idaho counties with populations over 100 thousand. 💜
Emily, does Bills comments to the Judge and expert (Not Today) demonstrate his unspoken "authority" over the judge based on a long history of friendship and knowing each other in a small town?
at: my client is trimming his eyebrows before every hearing.
jj: already noted
My eyebrows have left my face and joined my hairline 😅, how did I miss this the first time thanks Emily for all you do💜💜💜
🙋♀️ Thank you for the bits on a case that just keeps on giving. I hope you’re having a lovely Friday. Appreciate you. 💜
Thank you! You too!
Thanks!
You bet!
I'm glad you added in the TikTok psychic!
PS - Simply watching *your* reactions on this video, brings me so much joy. 😅
I so agree with you. All these people talk about cleaning house or something while they listen. I'm like, what? When Emily does a live first read, I'm all the way in for it. Her reactions, both physical and oral, are to live for. Gotta watch her face, the best part.
@@ronniweatherford4232 😅 So true!
TBH, there is not a single thing MSM says or prints that I believe. I will sometimes listen if there is an update on a case which usually turns out to be wrong!
so you don't believe Trump's first criminal trial is starting Monday? So you don't believe that the witnesses will include the woman he paid $130,000 to just stay quiet about his affair with her? Well that's so convenient isn't it? That way you never have to change your mind about anything. Sooo,you don't believe murder reports? You don't believe local news reports? you don't believe traffic reports or car crash reports? I guess it's a lot like being illiterate
Very true and bc of it I've went back in history and researched everything I ever believed and over 90% was all lies!!!
“Stay mad.”😅
Stay mad was something I didn't expect in court....same with 'not today judge'
I love you so much for calling the prosecutor Santa!😂😂😂 I have never heard a prosecutor speak to a judge in this way. Judge Judge is going on the naughty list 4 sure! If I was called and asked about something I hadn’t heard about- I would Run to google and find out what they were talking about. I personally would be immediately poisoned by a survey about the case.
Wow. This trials gonna be interesting
Have lived in Idaho 30+ years... The repartee was AMAZINGLY LOL...so very Idaho.
Fiery hearing, still boring.. can we get to trial already?
Beckon Bill his RED face then his Ghastly White face and back to Red again .. he was Shook. Good for Anne. JJJ is not in my opinion good enough to take on this case he seems lazy and Offensive with his Sarcasm in a DP case Very Unprofessional all around. MY Opinion
I agree with you all points. Really disappointed in JJJ behaviour so far
the victims and their families deserve better-let’s see what Kohberger drums up for an alibi- Anne sure is bossy toward Judge Judge!!!
You need a laugh button on here! Lol!😂
Bill sounded like he didn't understand. I have a doc level edu in same areaas eexpert & he was accurate. State sounded a little liike "rubes".If JJ does his reseach hopefully he learns this is normal & they look backwards actiing like this is unusual (ot is for them, not across US).
I have a question but seemingly invisible here coz no money to join, imma ask anyway . Everyone has phones/AKA COMPUTERS in their hands. How in todays time you finding ANYONE who hasn’t seen SOMETHING? What happens then??? How is a jury supposed to be unbiased anyway?!?! Thanks🙏🏻
Linda...there are no members on this channel, only my live channel. Seeing something isn't the issue, it's more about how much they have seen and if they've made up their mind or can be fair. The Depp case found jurors who weren't paying attention to the case. There are news stories I pay little attention too even if they are big stories.
💜👋🇳🇱 Love from the Netherlands.
Do we have court today? I feel like we do🤞
it was all pretty wild, it just topped it off that the judge didn't make a ruling, that did me in lulz
At this rate, the trial won't take place until next year!
The fact that people ran to the Prosecution with news of the survey is very disturbing. The community is perhaps overly invested in every little thing. While they are horribly affected, a fair trial is not likely IMO. “Not today Judge” seems to be Judge Judge’s modus operandi.
Are we going to get a live stream on the 16th for TikTok physic zoom court?
I am going to re-cap the hearing after it's done. It won't be streamed.
Judge Judge giving slight "Ito" vibes.
Maybe there are lots of experts that do not believe that their expertise will be able to benefit the defence. Maybe there is nothing wrong with their ability to smell bs that the defence wants to present
B I N G O I had TikTok psychic as my middle square!! lol 😝 I found it really amusing when I thought of the survey, that gentleman didn’t even register. We all pointed the finger at Anne. Didn’t blame the “expert” at all in my head. He isn’t a lawyer.
Hi!
lol those questions weren’t anything we haven’t heard a million times put out there by Steve Goncalves and News Nation it’s pure gaslighting to claim a violation of the gag order came from defense
💜💜💜💜
Can they move the trial to Nottingham
Bill flaming the expert could be strategy,.. to get other experts/witnesses to fear joining their defense team or else get dragged ?
That's actually simple SOP, for _both_ sides.
Lol he didn’t drag anyone he looked like a fool
😂😂😂such a funny court hearing. But really not funny😅😅😅
We want to know if we live here or a different zip code.
Is that tainting the survey pool? By asking people about the case?
Not if it’s asking what’s already been out. But it seems the judge, the prosecution and the defence aren’t aligned
Go ahead and be as angry as you like 😂 5:28
This would go a lot easier if they took the death penalty off and just did life in prison. Quite frankly, life in prison would be a lot worse for me. Rip the bandaid off quickly. But I'm extremely neurdivergent. However, Ann Taylor is right - it's so difficult to get all the things they need on time or at all. And then she has to go thru them. Then, experts are hard to come by because the world is watching this case. It seems like it is so much more difficult for this case than others. However, I am surprised by how unprofessional law enforcement investigations are in other states. CA is so litigious that law enforcement and courts need to be exacting. At least EDB gets the CA thing. Oftentimes, others are wondering why we're so careful here. Having friends and family in law enforcement, we know everyone gets sued for everything. We also know that everyone has a portable camera in their hands.
IMHO the judge is acting reasonably. I apologize in advance if I misunderstood anything. The defense was told to provide a copy of the questionnaire to the prosecution and the Judge Judge (gotta love the name) for review. Prosecution only found about the questionnaire dissemination after they were contacted by people receiving calls.
Some questions were were based on Reddit and other forums that contain speculation (theories, leaked information, rumors, speculation and conjecture) which could taint the jury pool.
💜💜💜
It was one of two best days in court for BK so far w/o saying a word so far. So, this is what we know - BK wasn’t stalking and is not the stalker, no connections found between BK and victims, no physical evidence of victims found in any of BK’s realms, can’t prove any of the suspect vehicles were BK’s or they were at the crime scene or BK was in them, the County has a biased jury pool. It keeps getting a steeper climb for this so-called “slam dunk” case…. So, is there a secret CI witness ready to testify against BK for a better outcome for themselves? And, even if so, how could anything that CI be proved or believed?
I lived in Idaho. Small potatoes.
My question is why didn't the defense go over these questions or the judge? It was blindly sent out without any editing.
Uh yeah that’s the point
Oof spicy level 10000
UM..... " to show more ..you have to feed more misinformation into the jury pool?" 😳
I’m exhausted by both sides in this case. It’s gross sometimes.
That being said, I always try, emphasis on try….. to take a breath and remind myself that these things are important, and that the American justice system system while flawed is amazing.
But my lord the victims circle of friends and family. I feel for them more and more as this drags on.
I feel for them being lied by Santa and now they look like they on purpose spread a false narratieve. They got a document of Santa where it got implied BK stalked 1 of the girls so they said that in interviews. To hear Santa admit that bk never stalked them. This case is a mess thanks to Bill Thompson. And I'm not convinced BK did it but if he did and walks it's only Santa to blame
The expert works with opinions every day but he sure doesn’t like negative opinions about himself. I found him thin skinned- he should allow his impressive resume and experience to speak for itself.
If you find him thin skinned what on earth would you think of Bill ??? lol
I concur. He was crying. Poor baby.
Wwooww
It seems to me that the people surveyed who weren’t all that familiar in the beginning, are now. I mean realistically speaking, if I got a phone call, I’d be on the computer as soon as I hung up. It’s a betrayal and the Judge is pissed. He may feel backed into a corner and have to grant the defenses motion in order to avoid a mistrial.
What if . . . The stories swirling around about fraternity shenanigans are true? Should we continue to ignore them just because we really don't want to believe that?
Rumors have no place in a court of law.
Blahblahblah
Kohberger is gonna fight. This is his area of expertise.
I think he had a defense plan for as long as he had his victims chosen, or longer.
Did you not even listen to the hearing? Bill T stated BK did not stalk the victims. You must have a rock for a brain. How many ways does it have to be repeated before you understand? The phone pings mean nothing by LE's own admission as BK wasn't stalking anyone at the King Rd house. Their "evidence" is dwindling as more facts come out. Even after clarifying that BK didn't stalk the victims you proceed to state the exact opposite and it's because of people like you who no matter what believe MSM misinformation and why the venue needs to change. Double Duh.
It's really has nothing to do with his "expertise". His attorney creates the strategy for defense.
@@mtz6198 True but I am sure this dude is giving input.
Dealth penilty
Too expensive. Life in prison is cheaper, overall.
EDB💜Thank you for always being you and your viewpoints! My 🐾 pawnerd went to the 🌈 bridge and somehow listening to this is so soothing for the mind. Thank you
So sorry 😢
I'm so sorry for ur loss😢 I also lost a furbaby last night😪
I am so very sorry for your losses💔💔
😢 this is devastating. I am so sorry I will be praying for your comfort!
I am so sorry for your loss. Losing a pet is so so hard.
Him saying he was angry doesn't negate him crying. Some people cry when they're angry.
Ann Taylor wears the pants in this courtroom. Judge needs to take control & quit allowing all the delays!! Santa’s voice doesn’t match his physique 😄
⚖️🕵️🧑🔬
Stop wasting time. Send Kohberger to Oklahoma and Texas; down here we have an express lane to Death Row
I say, that's all Brian's idea about the survey. Do you all remember when we first heard about him? And when he was attending his criminal Justice classes or teaching off. Whatever he was doing at that time he had sent out or wanted to send out a survey to prisoners and have them answer questions about how they Felt about committing the crime and getting ready to go commit the crime and all sorts of silly questions and I believe it was stopped. But it was supposed to be answered by people in jail and I just think this is all in his head and that attorney he's got. We'll go along with anything. She may have even said. Didn't you prepare survey before? Let's do another one. If I were the parents of those 4 kids, I would be furious at what this defense attorney is doing with this case.She's a disgrace
This is literally common practice in high profile cases.
This was exactly my thought too.
Duh. It wasn't BK idea. Commonplace to do these surveys in high profile cases. God, if people like you are on a jury no wonder there are so many wrongful convictions.
His attorney is doing her job.
She's giving him the most vigorous defense she can and she's doing a good job. I understand what it's like to live alone, do things alone, not have an alibi for something. That's always been my fear: that I would be falsely accused because of people like you.
Please don't talk over the clips you post. It's a bad practice.
Who is this message for
Linda....the Quick Bits are summaries and clips from streams which are legal commentary...so talking is best practice.
@@EmilyDBakerQuickBits I truly don't wish to be a troll, but I watch a lot of true crime channels and I think it is unusual for the commentator to make sounds in the background while the clip is playing. It reminds me of the two guys talking in the wings of The Voice while someone is performing. It is distracting and unprofessional. Just some honest feedback, well intended, honestly. I would respectfully disagree that it is best practice. Play the clip, let us watch it, then comment on it. That's my preference.
There’s something about this “expert” witness I don’t like, and I can’t put my finger on it. Might have to do with the fact that he doesn’t seem to see how his survey question about BK **allegedly** stalking the victims could very well taint the jury pool if in fact the people questioned had NOT heard that allegation or that it may or may not be true.
I don’t like the questions. Because if they know something about the case then they do hear all 9 questions. There is still a way to write them open. “What, if anything, have you read, seen or heard related to DNA in this case?” You aren’t feeding bad info but still promoting further discussion and things for potential jurors to expand on to show prejudice. I don’t understand how this is currently an accepted practice.
So I guess should have hired you instead of the expert in this field 🙄
I can’t believe the attitude some people are having towards the Judge, um I hope they never serve on a jury nor have to be in a courtroom for any reason. The Judge is the King of his courtroom unequivocally and without question. I know most people aren’t used to dealing with that level of authority as adults. The defense is going to be stuck with shady experts it sounds like. Also the Judge doesn’t need to rule on the same day. We all understand this even if it’s frustrating.
There is absolutely NO VENUE that hasn’t had a crapload of pre trial publicity!
First comment! :)
I feel most for the families who will never get justice for their children. Games being played on the brutal murders of children. And we wonder why no one has faith in our legal system? It's this.
I prefer Santa over Ann Taylor.
I believe that the defense team deliberately misinterpreted the statements made by the judge and prosecutor. It is evident to me that they have a specific venue in mind and are willing to go to any extent to get there. They made false claims by vehemently stating that there was no information in the questionnaire that was not present in The Probable Cause Affidavit, whereas they knew that the problem was with the questions that were not related to the affidavit.
I think Ann Taylor was far more strident, disrespectful, and obnoxious than the prosecutor. I think she is a whiny, sneaky lawyer who is doing everything she can to delay this trial. Her statement about believing in her client's innocence and his rights being "most important" makes me sick. Yes, he deserves a fair trial, but THE RIGHTS OF THE VICTIMS ARE EQUALLY SO and right now, this judge isn't even setting a trial date. I am sick of seeing this defense constantly bending over backwards for BK! Also, this judge need to stop stammering, stop delaying, and set a trial date once and for all. JUSTICE FOR THE VICTIMS.
It is the Defense's job to "bend over backwards" for their client.
I totally agree with you. I absolutely think Bryan Kohberger is responsible for the murders but if evidence came out that shows me differently then I would change my mind. I can still be fair and I don’t see Ann Taylor as a trustworthy person. She is very sneaky and she is so disrespectful to the judge. She has a job to do but she doesn’t have to throw her morals out to do the job. I want him to have a fair trial with proper representation. I don’t want anyone to be able to say that he didn’t get a fair trial. Bill Taylor is getting tired of the defense antics and he is starting to get very upset. I’m glad to see that he is fighting for the victims in this case. Bryan Kohberger is lucky to have Judge Judge because he is trying to make this a fair trial. I look forward to the evidence coming out that’s going to prove his guilt without a doubt.
Sorry, avoiding this case like the plague. I just don't care about this psycho. More interested in the upcoming Baldwin trial!
I liked ‘keep being mad” statement because I think he saying put your anger where it belongs. Maybe he was used by defense and isn’t it getting them what they want a change of venue? Perhaps.
Am I the only one that thinks the defence attorney deliberately tainted the possible jury pool with this questionnaire so she can have a change of venue?? Because it looks so malicious that she didn’t get a change of venue then this questionnaire of questions over and above its intent.
So what this means is that Kohlberger’s family is extremely wealthy.
Absolutely not! The state of ID is paying for his defense. It's *Kohberger*
@@camiburchett9602 really? Why are they doing all that then?
@@timdrake4951 I mean the people of Latah County are paying for his counsel. Taxpayers' $$
@@camiburchett9602 I know what your saying but I don’t recall public defenders going to the lengths of surveys in other cases.
Is it just me or does Bryan Kohberger look like an off-brand Dennis Reynolds from It’s Always Sunny?
you know the shit is way out of the horse when they mention the psychic in this case 🪄🔮👀
i cant wait for the actual trial ,,im over invested ☕️🫖🫖
thankyou Emily!!!!💜💜💜