Rebutting Genesis Apologetics - Debunking John n Jane 9o12
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 мар 2022
- Rebutting Genesis Apologetics = Debunking John n Jane
Here is a link to the whole playlist:
• Rebutting Foundations ...
I am addressing this pseudoscience apologetics video, "Debunking Evolution with John and Jane":
• Debunking Evolution (F...
If you like what I do, please consider supporting my efforts.
PATREON► / aronra
PAYPAL► www.paypal.me/AronRa 
Развлечения
Aron Ra, years ago I commented on your video as a full blown evangelical Christian. I am now deconverted thanks to your videos. It took time but I am now living in freedom
Congratulations, Welcome back to reality.
Good to see there are still those with reason
Good for you. No longer a Slave.
A liberated man...
Faith in humanity that we can overcome our own flaws on our own without the mandate of a heavenly power, or the threat of external damnation from that power, is liberating. But now the hard work begins. Without the mandate of God you must now find you're own purpose and meaning. To do good because it is good and right because it is such. And if not you who? And more importantly when? Welcome back brother.
John and Jane’s entire basis for their argument is: “I don’t understand how this works, therefore science is wrong and you shouldn’t bother doing the research yourself because god.”
That really isn't their basis. Their basis is that their god created the entire universe 6-10 thousand years ago, and therefore any evidence that contradicts must be dismissed. They're pretending to think their way to that dismissal, but their "thinking" is scripted, right down to their furrowed brows.
ALL creationists arguments come down to the same thing "I don't don't know, therefore god".
@@Andre_XX Your evidence is?
Just trust the scientists. Get your shots.
@@walnutoil100 My evidence? Just listen to any, and I really do mean ANY, creationist.
Every time Jane starts with "is it just me, or", it's always followed by something really stupid.
Every time she says that, my first reaction is "Yep."
It's never the latter, not usually the former, and it never seems to make Jane think.
It has to be something so incredibly stupid that it seems dumb even to creationists, to set up John to correct the simple minded female as is the man's duty.
Even when she doesn't start with "Is it just me, or"...
@@TheReaverOfDarkness her sinister child like ego gets in her way
To add to Jane and John's many other crimes against humanity's brain cells, I now find myself fuming over the abomination that is Jane's pullover - it's hard to imagine that a worse representation of my national flag has ever been created...
And yet it’s still the best thing on screen ! Lol
FYI it’s my flag too 👍
@@budd2ndLove from Canada
The true miracle of this series is that Aron has made these creation videos watchable. I don’t know how someone could produce John and Jane and think it could actually classify as either educational or entertainment.
The producers are a viral variant on fundamentalist Christianity and have been thoroughly brainwashed.
So have their followers.
Keep in mind that these aren’t intended for a broad viewing audience but rather their own bubble. It’s propaganda to reinforce their own beliefs.
@@dr.floridamanphd Oh I know. I compare these to the old DARE videos from back when I was in school. They are meant to "relate" to the audience, regardless of how small it is, but come off as so corny. I wouldn't be surprised if these videos actually had the opposite impact than intended. I know I'd be asking question out of spite after being forced to suffer through this trash.
@@ecpracticesquad4674 I remember DARE.
“If you smoke marijuana… you’ll end up sucking dick for coke.”😂😂😂
Ok. They didn’t say that to a group of 5th graders but that’s the gist of it.
Reefer Madness movies, do you remember?
At this point, I truly wonder if John and Jane are secretly atheist trolls trying to spoof fundamentalist Christians. I cannot imagine them not realizing how idiotic they sound (and how much worse they look when Aron exposes their disingenuity).
Jane: "Is it just me-"
Me: "-Yes"
Jane: "-or does [misunderstanding]?"
Me: "No"
I do the exact same thing.
Instead of "is it just me or is it impossible to line up animals in the way they evolved?' a more relevant question would be "is it evidence for any theory to simply categorize life forms in different orders while attaching unproven assumptions based on that?"
@@lightbeforethetunnel What unproven assumptions?
@@tomjackson7755 For one, the idea that all life forms have a common ancestor. Second, that a process exists in which life forms obtain increasing genetic complexity (gain of new information) through reproduction, when this supposed process has never been observed occuring. And many more.
@@lightbeforethetunnel imagine talking about unproven assumptions while believing in a literal magical genie😂👍
I’m not at all happy about her wearing my flag, it rather devalues it.
The shift from Carrie to homologous structures was far-fetched, even for John&Jane.
Ya think? ;-) This is what they consider to pass as "clever".
It was pretty predictable though.
Like, creationists only have so many arguments, so it's easy to predict what they are going to say.
Yea I got whiplash from how sharp that turn was
He should debate James Tour if he wants a challenge.
What. The. Fuck. Is this shit?
Hi AronRa, I spoke with you on the Creaky Blinders show. As some of your other comments mentioned, I too have left the ministry because of your words. I was so mad at you for a minute! I went OFF on Creaky! I sent him an angry email because I couldn't send one to you! Lol the poor Welsh bastard.
I luv you guys and I am so grateful for my freedom, even though it's scary.❤️
I feel like Aron’s even more annoyed with these two than we are, so he decided to have some fun and bring in some pop culture references. Not sure if it’s the right place for it, but I got a good chuckle out of it.
You need to check out the video where John gets his eyes dilated and talk about natural selection. Aron has a lot of fun with that one.
I would love to see John and Jane in Pulp Fiction in an awkward meeting with Jules Winnfield and Vincent Vega! Hahahahaha!!
I want to see Aron debate these two.
@@Sonjacrow Yeah, his eyes were dilated cause he was smoking crack, that's what all crackheads say "I just got back from the eye doctor"
Of course it's the right place for some pop culture references - even if I don't get all of them. (I probably know less about film than anyone else on the planet.)
We need more rational people like you Aaron
Aron*.
Autocorrect gets me too.
@@dr.floridamanphd Aerhon*
But, I am not here to correct anyone, even though I am obviously the correctest of the lot of us.
If we want more rational people, we should simply be those and show to the people around us that it is the best alternative to having faith as a way of thinking, which it demonstrably is. Faith teaches to avoid and to sugar coat and to stick our heads in the clouds and wish problems away, which does nothing but burden the next generations with them when we could've just set an example of trying to solve problems, sometimes together.
I, evidently, am here to kick our dead theistic and otherwise superstitious ancestors in the face and to present you with an opportunity to not join them when my grandchildren learn about faith and start kicking dead people and religions and other superstitions. I wonder if my integrity will be enough to not be considered a coward for kicking dead people. I wonder if I should care.
Is it rational to think your ancient ancestor is hydrogen gas?
As a man of science, I believe humans have only human ancestors, not hydrogen gas.
It’s called biochemistry and genetics - that’s rational.
@@dr.floridamanphd Mutaions do that.
@@BillMorganChannel "Is it rational to think your ancient ancestor is hydrogen gas?"
What kind of misrepresation of the processes involved in abiogenesis is that ?
"As a man of science, I believe humans have only human ancestors, not hydrogen gas."
I suppose then that the last ancestor we had with chimpanzees was also human. Making them human then, no?
You know I once spoke to a creationist about evolution and they said ;'Science hasn't found 'the missing link'. Before pointing out anything I asked them. What would this missing link look like? What features would you expect in such a skeleton. They said they don't know what such a link would look like. My reply was, Then how do you know it hasn't been found? Because they said, they'd know... The then proceeded to list off several intermediary examples..but yeah it went exactly like that futurama episode.
again this is probably what happens when you have Kent Hovind teaching people science.
John and Jane videos are merely Christian masturbation; it's more about self-satisfaction than reality.
Have we ever seen any of Hovind's alleged students? I would imagine that he would bring all least one onto his shows, if they ever actually existed.
@@Captain-Cosmo I think that it's a combination of masturbation and sedation.
@@lnsflare1 Hovind's minions tend to be the ones on the other side of the camera during his videos. I think he's much more interested in having an audience to stroke his ego than having any one of them take the reins.
There are zero fossils that qualify as transitional fossils when properly investigated & evaluated. There are, however, numerous examples of proven forgeries and fakes along with verifiable convictions of fraud for them over the last 160+ years. Where are these millions and millions of transitional fossils that would exist if Evolution is true? Darwin himself wrote about how he didn't know of any back then, but expected them to be found. He specifically wrote that if they aren't found, that would be a problem for his theory. Well, they haven't been. Yet people still believe Evolution? It's a religion.
Any man that’s ever had a kidney stone knows that the “design” sucks.
One thing I really like about this series and others like it is watching the arguments can help you understand something you may not have fully understood before. Someone who's trying to teach you may not know what you do and don't understand. But watching people like Aron correct someone who perpusly or ignorantly misrepresent an argument or teaching has helped clear up a lot about the finer details in topics I personally misunderstood or didn't know about.
What it's done for me personally is bridge the gap of understanding towards religious apologetics. Oftentimes, these arguments feel like Skrulls trying to pass off as human. What enough of them, however, and patterns start to emerge - fundamental gaps in the cognition of apologists. This video demonstrates the "randomness fallacy" - the binary fallacy which asserts that a thing must either be intelligently created or occur entirely randomly, with no option in-between. The failure to acknowledge the concept of "emergence" - of things emerging out of uncontrolled interactions between fundamental laws - is pervasive and explains a lot.
Thank you Aron for the consistent quality content.
14:35 I suddenly realized that the world needs an audiobook of "The Origin of Species" read by Aron Ra.
I second that motion!
😂 that would be great
Loved seeing Aron having fun with the Carrie dream thing. Nearly choked on my drink when I saw the "bear."
Surely that was an innocent audio glitch riiiiight?
(Looks back it the video he was just listening) Oh my. Not just a glitch.
Yeah it was good to see him poking fun.
_If we compare this rock to this laptop computermachine, we can clearly see that both are designed! One by my imaginary friend, and the other by people! In fact, there's no difference between them, so I'm not even sure how I picked these two separate designed objects, because they appear identical to me!_
This is what the "common design common designer" non-argument leads to if the creationist is honest. But saying 'honest creationist' is like saying 'ethical Republican' or 'sane Qanon cultist'.
Jane: Is it just me or -
Me: It’s just you, honey.
Come on, I have no doubt that it is impossible for our friend to line up "animals in the way they evolved", given her obstinate dedication to ignorance.
If she says "is it just me, or..." one more time, I'm going to lose my sh!t
I can’t help it, I’ve started saying loudly - “yes it is you, you complete idiot!”
I'm going to make a bold prediction that we will hear it at least four more times before the series ends.
I was a Biology TA several years ago and I taught in a room full of vertebrate skeletons. Just by looking at the various skeletons from birds to turtles to rats to horse legs the homology was incredibly striking. Why are there always the same number of vertebrae? Why are the different limbs made of the same same or similar arrangements of bones? Why is the end of a horse's leg made of three obviously fused bones instead of a single bone? And so on and so on.
I think these nitwits would greatly benefit from a hands on biology course instead of a scripted critique of high school level science textbooks.
You’re forgetting that they are WILLFULLY ignorant. They actually know better, but they like to pretend they don’t.
Too bad that wouldnt do anything for any serious creationists. They would just assert that they are similar cuz they have the same designer...
So can you present evidence evo can create the information required for new species?
Common designer. Similar design.
@@wilsontexas
Yes. God is indeed common.
The problem with John and Jane (like most YEC) is that they are so wrong, it takes time to counter them.
It's not just a correction.
You have to waste time just to explain how and why they are lying about evolution.
Your evidence they are wrong?
The preferred term nowadays is "truthfulness-challenged" instead of "lie".
Thank you for your cooperation.
@@walnutoil100 Play the video perhaps. And then the other videos about them
@@Conan-Le-Cimmerien He don't dare to watch, because then he might learn something, and knowledge is the enemy of religion.
In order to correct a creationist, you must first invent the universe
*Jane [every fucking episode]:* "Is it just me, or..."
Yes, it's just you!! It's always just you!! No matter what it is, it's just you!!!
The creationist's 'circular logic' assertion was projection with a carbon arc lamp. Creationism is an assumed conclusion, without supporting evidence. The use of the false dichotomy fallacy makes it look like the creationist's assumed conclusion is the only alternative option to the scientific analysis.
Creationism is an assumed conclusion, without supporting evidence.- Your evidence is?
@@walnutoil100 The entire history of this lie. Creationists never explored, never discovered, never produced new evidence or knowledge about the world. They've only ever come after scientists has done the hard work of science and seek only to undermine what they see as competition. They are in the business of spreading propaganda; not trying to understand anything.
@@walnutoil100 BTW, I'm talking about creationists actually opposing science; not the scientific minds who happened to believe in creation because they didn't know any better, so leave Newton, Bacon Copernicus, Gallileo, etc. out of this.
@@zemorph42 I had previously blocked 'New Hope Enterprises', because he refuses to accept that he has no evidence to support his assertions. I only found your response to New Hope Enterprises when browsing through. There is no substance to the claims of such creationists.
@@clemstevenson I enjoy responding to some of them sometimes; it amuses me and helps me to practice countering the nonsense.
How anyone can believe these John and Jane videos after watching Aron’s rebuttal videos is beyond me. He crushes it every time.
It's one thing when you're watching these in the sterile environment of your local institution of indoctrination, but when placed in some context, yah, no.
In the unlikely event that a creationist watched one of these videos, they would probably run off to their pastor or to Answers in Genesis in hopes of finding a rebuttal. Deconversion is usually a gradual process. I think of these videos more as a seed than as something that will lead to a sudden epiphany.
Unfortunately, those who watch John and Jane believe they they are getting good information, and they heartily embrace it in order to prop up their theology. They have been fed a steady diet of religion v science nonsense since Scopes.
@@Captain-Cosmo For some strange reason, thinking critically is not a taught skill in those communities.
@@inyobill For some "strange" reason, indeed! :) I grew up in a small town in Georgia where science is openly derided in their churches and communities. Their idenities surrendered to their theogical beliefs, they insulate themselves from anything which might threaten those very identities. Their god and their own identities become one, and a threat to their god is a threat to them. It is insideous brainwashing on a massive scale.
Another big dunk against YEC, thank you aron, for you consistent, detailed, explanations. Systematically debunking each and every point in these videos
@@raysalmon6566 can ya elaborate? I don't think i understand what you mean
@@raysalmon6566 several? You're the first reply to this comment... Idk what you mean..
@@raysalmon6566 go back to your talking snake and donkey, will ya?
@@eh9618 "I don't think i understand what you mean" That's no problem, he doesn't either.
@@johnscaramis2515 ah, no wonder
"Imagine the job evolutionists have!" I rather want to ask creationists this. Ask ten creationists, get twelve wacky answers.
So present evidence nature caused life to begin
@@walnutoil100 Other way round dude.
The onus is on Religion to present evidence that life was caused by supernatural claims like "God breathed life into a lump of clay"
We all observe nature, we live in a natural world. It is the supernatural that has yet to be proven.
@@walnutoil100 here's the difference:
Science has shown that abiogenesis (which is not evolution) is likely, and life is here now so we can easily reason that it happened at least once. If we don't yet know exactly how, that's not a barrier to the FACT that chemistry favors organic molecules.
On the other hand you have religion, which in lieu of using actual facts will encounter something unknown, and instead of trying to understand it, will simply declare "god did it". That isn't an answer. It's a cop-out. Lazy thinking. It's what frightened primitives do to explain the scary world around them in a desperate attempt to assert some sort of control.
Here it's 2022. It's the age of flight, space flight, computers, and all sorts of technology and knowledge that 20 years ago was science fiction.
And yet religious people would rather think as though they were frightened primitives huddling in a cave pretending spirits control the lightning because the very notion of lightning being uncontrolled makes them crap themselves.
Maybe join the rest of us in the present? In reality?
@@walnutoil100 I do somewhat understand this viewpoint. Consciousness, as I see it, is basically modern science's #1 most confusing unanswered question. Many theories are thrown around about how consciousness exists, but in the end, I'm sure most people would admit they simply don't know... including me.
However, Creationists have just as little of an answer to that as anybody else does. Their solution is that God created consciousness... but that isn't a solution at all, given they'd first have to answer how God got there in the first place in order for it to be a valid proof.
I personally doubt anybody alive on the Earth right now is aware of how existence came to be in the first place. Logically, nothing should exist... not even empty space, or any concept of nothingness or anything at all. Yet things very clearly do exist, that cannot be denied as you are experiencing it right now (I assume... I at least know that I am). It's quite a thrilling question... one that Creationists don't have an answer to, nor do Evolutionists, nor do anybody else. It being unanswered cannot possibly be used as a valid disproof of anything in any way until somebody else gets it figured out, and I honestly doubt that'll happen any time soon.
To paraphrase Get Smart:
'Did you get all that, Jane?'
'Not really.'
'What part didn't you get?'
'The part after 'Now listen very carefully.'
A "Fiddler" reference? AND a Beavis and Butthead reference? Seriously?
AronRa, you're amazing.
A few episodes ago Jane was wearing a Triumph top and I, as a Triumph rider, felt personally threatened. Now she has a Union Jack top! This girl is living in my head. If she has a Harlequins rugby jersey on before this series is done they'll be hearing from my (imaginary) lawyers.
Jane's still wearing a cursed item: the Hat of Befuddlement. Only powerful logic can remove it.
More commonly known as the "ass hat"
I don’t think the hat is cursing her, I think she’s cursing the hat. She’s charging it.
@@johnbiggscr Wow yeah good point.
The HOB self charges from the wearer.
Nasty.
I guess this is what happens when you can't get a job as Sorting Hat.
@@goldenknight578 Poor grammar. What does 'sorting hat' mean?
I'm Aron's age, and I still find myself discovering (sometimes obvious) connections between words for the first time. For example, before watching this, I'd never noticed the etymological similarity between CREATure and CREATE.
If you speak to Catholics, they are likely to point it out to you. I really pisses them off if you call God a critter.
@@rembrandt972ify critter actually also evolved from "creature" through French though in this case...
Language and its history/evolution is a truly beautiful thing.
@@memesarekeem and a beautiful analogue for biological evolution in many ways
There is a theist moron that trolls around atheist sites and whines about us all being creatures because we were created. The dude actually thinks that the words are this way because god exists. Theists are weird sometimes.
That bear joke had me in stitches. Thanks for the quality content Aron. keep it coming 😊😂❤❤
@Account NumberEight you see, when 2 men or 2 women love eachother very much.... Nothing really happens other than a fun time
Worst Ginger Spice cosplay ever.
The least convincing argument: "I don't understand it, therefore, it's impossible."
I don’t understand it, therefore Mickey Mouse did it.
Same thing really.
@@dr.floridamanphd There is better evidence for M. M., is the only semi-cogent reaction I can come up with.
@@inyobill we know a Mickey mouse exists, and therefore it is possible for a Mickey to exists. There must exist other Mickeys in other possible worlds. There are infinite possible worlds, therefore some possible world hosts a maximally powerful Mickey. A Maximally powerful Mickey exists in all possible worlds, therefore the great Mickey exists and watches us from above with hatred all lovingly.
@Aron Ra thank you for this series and all your other videos… because of you and people like Dapper Dino and Gutsick Gibbon I have been able to express my views of religion and science to people who are extremist … I know have the knowledge to properly represent the geological column and the process of evolution and can do it confidently … I am currently in the process of getting my high school diploma ( 20 years late ) and because of you guys I am more then sure my science class is going to be a breeze … thank you again
Have a look at Jackson Wheat's channel as well.
@@vestafreyja yep he is great also I also like SciMan Dan
@@jeremykoerperich4779 Another great content provider is Creation Myths.
@@vestafreyja yep I like him also
@@vestafreyja when I really started to watch these videos about evolution and things about 3 years ago I jumped down all kinds of rabbit holes lol and the thing that got me hooked is no matter who’s videos you listen to it’s always the exact same proven evidence … since then I have probably watched 100s of debates with lots of Christians Vs evolution and the Christians can’t even agree on the same information they can take the same verse and get a hundred different things from it ( like Ken Ham and Kent Hovind they cant even agree on half of what the other one says but feel they have enough knowledge to open to different attractions that cant even agree on the message) but every person in the evolution side always has hard data that is peer reviewed and doesn’t differ by the person’s opinion which is why I love all these guys content … I’m personally not a very smart person but people like @Aron Ra and @Dapper Dino and all there buddies explain their sides of the argument directly and with unarguably information which makes it easy to understand and because it’s the same information if you don’t understand something in a @Dapper Dino video @Gutsick Gibbon may have explained it differently but it’s still the same information so you still learn it
well researched, clear, concise and honest rebuttal of these 'actors' bullshit. As always Aron.
???? What research - all he did was repeat evo talking points.
@@walnutoil100 you have to be joking mate, for starters Aron has dedicated a big chunk of his life to the study of evolution so I concede he could counter all the points the video put forth off the top of his head, but I bet he had to put in some research as I don't think he has an eidetic memory. Arons's responses are always educated on the subject whereas religitards come off like bumbling fools when talking with him.
I have nothing to add, all the other commenters here have said exactly what I think, only more eruditely, so I’ll just leave this comment for the Great Algorithm.
Excellent work, as always.
True story: I’m a college student. While in Biology 103 we got to the chapter of evolution when the professor asked the class, “who believes in evolution?” I was the only student to raise my hand. The professor then announced to the class that he’s a minister and a young earth creationist. At that point I decided I needed to transfer to another class. Sadly, I wasn’t able to and had to suffer through the rest of the semester with a professor that didn’t believe in the product he was teaching. Talk about a weapons grade face palm.
Horrible. Ever thought about suing the school?
What college was that?
So you were So bigoted intolerant and close minded you were unwilling to examine another point of view
Was it a Christian college? I went to one my freshman year, but at the same time took a night class in Biology at a community college because the science credits from the Christian school would not transfer towards a science degree at a “real” (aka operating under scientific consensus) school since they aren’t required to teach actual science
@@alisaurus4224 Nope. It’s a standard community college. But it’s in Southern Alabama, so I suppose it’s to be expected being in the “billy belt.”
Uve been one of my fave atheist/science RUclips channel for literally years
Her: "I had the weirdest experience last night."
Me: "Was it buying this fedora?"
Actually, as cladistics in headware go, this is more of a pork pie hat.
The most pleasant of surprises to wake up to a new Aron Ra vid.
I did not know that jellyfish have photo-receptors (eyes) round their bodies. This is why I watch Aron dismantling Jane and John's mindless drivel. The J's teach me nothing, but I always learn from Aron.
Now I need to go fix my broken nose after all the face palming they caused.
3:55 Another short snippet of Beavis and Butt-Head laughing would fit there too 😂
I've learnt more from watching your debunk videos then anywhere else, you've done me a massive service and I could never do enough to properly thank you.
You should watch his 50 part series on the systematic classification of life if you haven’t already.
He breaks down evolution at an 8th grade level so more people will be able to understand it.
@@dr.floridamanphd oh I did, by far my favourite series he has.
@@dr.floridamanphd honestly might watch it again at some point, the ending about human empathy really hit home.
@@theologicalintrospection the only thing I didn’t like about it were the shots he was taking at Hovind during their debate series were put in to some of the videos.
If you weren’t following his channel the jokes would’ve gone over the viewer’s head.
@@dr.floridamanphd in not a fan of it either, but I understand why he does, the alternative to what they want removed from curriculum is absolutely absurd.
Damn Aron went the extra mile and broke out the comedy for this episode
It seems that John and Jane completely ignoring the "structure" part of "homologous structures" when they bring up wings. The function is mostly irrelevant to determining if structures were derived from common ancestry
"Mammoths were mammoth. But mastodons weren't. They were mastodonoth."
---Albert Einstein
Aron, I love how your dog has something to say about these wack-a-doos
I'm sure the dog has had a much better education than Jane and John.
I believe it's a parrot that makes the background coughing/shouting noises on Aron's videos.
I think part of Jane's problem is her brain is filled to the brim with cognitive dissonance. Overflowing even.
I just stumbled onto this channel and I love how no-fucks-given attitude this channel has that is still intelligent and funny. Nice job, subbed
each day i look if aron will upload new debunk of john n jane.
i dont want these series to ever end
I do it several times each day.
Aron's landing these jokes with such a flat affect, I seriously thought he was angry at first, but then the references kept coming.
Mr ra i wish to have at least 1 conversation with you in my lifetime your truly amazing your knowladge in biology and phylogeny is just mind boggling. Thank you sir.
Me too! If Hugh jarsz got it right, there's hope for us😁👍
I know I'd have a blast if I ever got the chance to hang out with Aron. His sense of humor seems to be as warped as mine, so I'm sure we'd have fun.
I don't really think I would have much to talk about... He's kinda smart unlike me -_-
@@nati0598 shouldn't be negative plus then he could educate you
This was so good. I laughed out loud at least three times. Found you through Emma’s channel. You are so great. I bet your lectures are fantastic!
Some people come here for talking points, some people come here to get mad, I just come here for the science.
Well done Aron. As a Biologist I found the evidence and understanding behind homology and convergent evolution to be difficult. I get how J and J get it wrong. Your explanation is bang on and very understandable.
@@raysalmon6566 That's because it is not taught in seminary that it is respectable. Seeing how creationnist are afraid of facts you can't count on them to be accurate
@@raysalmon6566 I see that you completely contradicted yourself because if you went in a place that actually knew about evolution not only would it not be Christian and you wouldn't say evolution isn't supported.
Otherwise how do we do selective breeding? And that's just one of the many facts supporting evolution
That poor girl really can't pull of that hat, sweater, or face.
Ahh the challenge of pulling off your face or one's own self image...
Aron, please keep making these logical videos. I do believe they are making a difference, especially with younger generations.
Here's an idea everybody. If you let all the religious ads we see on these videos run out or play for at least 30 seconds then they end up financially supporting Aronra's channel. Every little bit helps, right? And trust me, they're really not that hard to just tune out.
I'm loving this series. It just makes me sad that there aren't too many episodes left of John 'n' Jane for Aron to debunk. Thanks again, Aron. 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
I will never be sad to NOT have one of these monstrosities be published.
I thought they still make these videos with Jane and John. Guess the debunks of their vids hit them too hard
@Richard Waddington John and Jane's videos are the monstrosity! What did you think I was talking about?
Alongside Carrie there were many other great "special guests" this week. Great editing and comedic timing! 😁
Fun video, especially love the cameo from Gamera!
I won't lie, sometimes, I do wish magic existed, but at the same time, knowing people, they would probably mess that up as well.
Your videos are always a sight for sore eyes, long day at work and I see your new video and watch it immediately. Hitchens would be proud of the work that you do.
I listened to their utterly inane opening conversation full of infantile suggestions and "lol we so random" attitude, and thought, "wow, I wholly trust these two characters and the production crew behind them to educate me!"
You are an exceptional teacher AronRa. I really enjoyed this video, even though I've been an atheist for the largest part of my life. It makes me happy to know there are people who fight for the truth. If I would have been a U.S.A.-citizen, I would have been furious if my children were corrupted with fairy tales in school (or online).
@@raysalmon6566 Are you ok ?
@@raysalmon6566 errr...okay. That's not what I asked, but good for you !
@@raysalmon6566 what… does that have to do with anything at all?
@@raysalmon6566 your comment was close to incoherent and had literally nothing to do with the video or this comment thread.
What the hell are you talking about?
It's always hard to wait for another "J and J" debunk video by Aron.
Already looking forward to the next one.
"The bear was on top of him.... his bed..." How did I miss this the first time? Aron, you magnificent bastard.
Perfect timing. Again. Must be all that wizardry! 🤣🤣🤣
Whenever Jane asks "Is it me...?" you can safely ignore the rest of the question. It's her.
Awesome videos
Waiting for Aron to use the quote from Luke "Amazing, every word of what you just said, was wrong."
Aron, you gotta be great and your unique style makes a space for so many of us.
Listening to these two turns my brain into a soup. Thanks Aron for another great debunk of their mythical magic bible story
I just find it hilarious that John and Jane are coutning up how many times a given thing is impossible, but then assert all living species were willed into existence by indescribable untestable unrepeatable unevidenced God-magic. And that is somehow *more likely and reasonable*, in their opinion.
Edit: I have just now gotten to the part where John calls convergent structures a "Fairytale". This from a guy who thinks giants existed, snakes and donkeys used to talk, that winged immortals flutter through the air and that actual literal magic exists, see the Witch of Endor story.
It's like when Kent wants to make fun of evolution by saying "you believe you come from a rock"... And he believes Adam comes from dirt...
@@yannicklucas1836 Depending on which version of the bible you use, Adam was made from clay. And clay is weathered rock...
@@johnscaramis2515 I don't use any...
@@johnscaramis2515 Isn't that basically the same ?
Certainly the most humorous video that I've seen from Aron.
Hahaha! I haven't seen "The Green Door" since the early 80s! What a strange memory flood that little snippet uncovered! 😱🤣
The only thing bad about these outstanding Aronra videos is it's him saying the same thing over and over. That's not Aron's fault: It's that the creationists are saying the same damn thing they've been spouting for decades!
"Flying" fish are possibly leading to a 6th form of flight. They have an extended ventral tail fin that allows them to power themselves out of the water not unlike a hydrofoil on a sailboat. Their pectoral fins then act as wings to allow them to glide over the water's surface. I don't know if they have any musculature to flap their fins, so they're stuck with gliding over the surface at the mercy of any air currents to get higher for now.
I used to see them all the time when I was in the Navy. The ones I saw would just glide a short distance, usually between swells. I never saw anything in the way of flapping.
One of your best!!! Keep making these ...I love the John and Jane series debunking
here we go, Franziskaner time ☝🏽😁
as always, greets from Germany Aron.
love not only for this series but for your content in general.
these two individuals here, never fail to fail 😅🤙🏽
Schoene Gruesse aus Swisttal.
@@inyobill Gruß zurück aus'm Pott
Franziskaner? My translating app came back with “Franciscan” when I typed that in. Is that accurate?
@@dr.floridamanphd I believe he's referencing a Bavarian brewery. They make a fine Weizen, and other brews. I didn't think of this potential collection until I read your comment. Now to check my spelling.
"There were doors, and windows and floors, just like my house!"
"Animals look similar, they couldnt have evolved from the same common ancestor that can be traced back to the only source of life on this planet."
"Animals look similar, they could only have been designed by the same intelligent designer that cant be demonstrated to exist at all."
These are the same people who call only two specific fields of science a belief system while they promote a belief system that defies reality. But dont call them delusional because that would be insulting.
I’d like to know if these guys watch your videos aron!! I wonder what their reaction would be!
They must know by now that they’re just giving you loads of good content!
Octopi have SUCH cool eyes! 😎 😍 Some of those shapes are freaking awesome!
Thank you for all you do, AronRa - it really means a lot to a very, very many of us! Oh, and you're damned sexy to look at _and_ listen to, with that hair, mustache, beard, and voice, as well! Big bonus!
The Recommending Holiness comment you to engage with this video.
25:00
i like how they show cheetahs as a example of an animal that was tailered to fit it's system
despite..you know, reality showing that cheetahs are..not fitted for their "system"
because you know..they're going extinct, due to their adaptions for running fast
well..that's some of the reasons anyway
Yep, the species is stuck in a bottleneck and cannot get a genepool wide enough to adapt to changing life. Lions, leopards, and other species are literally pushing them to extinction. Their prey meanwhile has a wide enough genepool that their adapt faster to counter them, with them fearing lions and hyenas a lot more than cheetahs. Add humans putting pressure on their species.
The "Bear" joke brought me to tears as you said it with that shit eating grin on your facing lol. Damn that was funny! Cheers!
AaronRa, the OG. I watch a lot of atheist videos, and have been watching for about 15 years...and I am still blown away by the level of detailed knowledge you casually drop to shut down these shallow creationist arguments. Keep doing what you are doing man
I like how they basically go off into Last Thursdayism.
Homologous structures can be explained by a common designer.
But analogous structures? Oh, that's a common designer, too. See, the same designer used a different approach for the same function.
The question isn't why do eyes show up in both squid and humans. The bigger question is why are they different?
It's been noted that simplicity is the hallmark of design. Designers use interchangeable parts when they can. Making parts different for no reason is an example of bad design, not intelligence.
"God can do anything he wants" is a content-free statement. There is nothing that can contradict it. Even if they agree with descent with modifcation, they can just say, "God made it look that way"
It's dumb.
Getting my weekly fix. :)
It was nice to see a gay reference in here when you were referring to Jane's brother!! Thanks for all your hard work and making evolution easier to understand!!
Another great video! Imagine all the people who were probably forced to watch John n Jane as a study course for reality. I hope they realize how wrong they are or reminisce then search on RUclips for them and find your videos to learn the truth.
The fact they turn off comments proves they have a closed mind, and their website sucks
I wonder if John and Jane have watched this series, I'd love to see their reaction.
Me too!
I doubt it. They seem like the type that don’t venture out of their echo chamber.
I wonder if the bear joke would go over their head..?
Work is always better when listening to you. Great video as always.
The freeze-frame on Jane's face at the end looks like she's just discovered the bear in her brother's bedroom....
I doubt they know what bears are in that sense.
I didn’t know what a bear was until I saw American Wedding.
Aron Ra you work tirelessly and critical thinkers of the world (absent of magic) owe you so much - thanks.
I wasn't expecting a Fiddler on the Roof reference.
Nobody expects the Spanish In...wait what?!
I lost it with the Behind the Green Door reference. I love Aron's sense of humor.
This comment is for Aron Ra. The Institute For Creation Research appears to have stopped using the term "young Earth creationism" and started using the term "recent creation." It appears that YEC has such a bad reputation that a relabeling needed to take place!
Recent creation, not resent. If it's resent creation you suggest they are anti creationism
@@idaniluz652 I changed the spelling. Thank you for pointing that out.
(Edit: Aron this one may be your best of the series. Definitely my favorite!)
I think that second eye, the one with more color amd being held by someone wearing gloves, is from a large swordfish or marlin. Not a squid.
I Like how this one is just Aron doing funny edits, it's the best. Love the facts too