Not disabled but closely monitored to delete anything reasonable that disagrees with them. They keep deleting my scientifically solid RUclips video on the age of the universe, Genesis and the Bigbang. :-(
@@head_banger and Stephen Hawkings said it was string theory. But flipflops on that. So beyond the universe creation. I'm sure u can explain how one dinosaur evolved to a completely different looking and size dinosaur...with absolutely no fossil records to show the extreme transitions that would have to have had occured for them to get to the different kind of dinosaur. Much less turn into a bird. Lmbo. If it was a Big Bang. God did it
There are thousands of religions each one with it's own creation myth. Since you haven't proven that your creation myth is true how do you know that one of the other creation myths that lies out there isn't the true creationi myth?
Would he even admit that if he were brought up in a different country or time and was taught a different creation myth from a very young age he'd believe in that other creation myth?
There will only ever be one truth. Say there’s a tree. One person says its blue the other yellow. It’ll never change the true color of the tree which is green.
You know what's so hilarious about people talking about a 'creator' and 'intelligent design' and all that stuff? The just don't read their bibles! In Genesis there is no mention of a 'intelligent designer', designing all the wonderful stuff around us, no there is just the mention of a .... drumroll.... magician or wizard! Read for yourself! This 'God' only speaks, he says 'THE MAGIC WORDS' like 'let there be light', 'let the earth be full of...' etcetera. And when he creates Adam, he takes clay from the ground, makes a figurine and breathes life into it's nostrils... That's no friggin' design, that's MAGIC, that's more like voodoo. God is introduced to us in the bible as this omnipotent magician or wizard, not a designer, let alone an intelligent designer. So 'intelligent design' falls flat on it's face, is dead on arrival from the viewpoint of 'biblical christians' because it does not in any means reflect the way God is introduced in the bible itself! Hilarious! Intelligent design is per definition at odds with the biblical account of creation!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
How is that voodoo if he didn’t sacrifice anyone or anything like these satanic people who kill children or animals etc. God did not make nothing wrong when he created everything, everything was perfect with no flaws.
Why is it important for a belief in God and a Divine Essence in the World and Universe, to have Creation take place 6,000 years ago based on genealogy with people hundreds of years old plus dinosaurs thrown in to this time scale? Why? Why when you were born on the ancient island continent of Australia would you chuck out the evidence of the animals unique to Tasmania with separated from the mainland 15,000 years ago, plus kangaroos, koalas and platypus on the mainland and Aboriginal culture of over 50,000 years? To say your book was irrefutable? Why is this a valid interpretation of scripture and not wishful thinking that destroys credibility??
THANK YOU. The severity of the event would have been recorded in the Bible, undoubtedly. Any living thing above ground was cooked alive and beaten by falling rock shortly after impact. Yet the only global disaster in the Bible is Noah’s Ark…and that could not have possibly been connected to the KT event.
@Soldier Many dinosaurs especially had air sacs in their bodies that provided a source of buoyancy, so that explanation does not make any sense. How do you explain how smaller species, such as Fruitadens (a small ornithopod), was discovered in a rock formation (Morrison Formation )that underlied the rock formation (Cedar Mountain Formation) that a large brachiosaurid sauropod, Cedarosaurus, was recovered in?
@Soldier 'that's literally explained by the fact..' 'Global flood' was falsified a long, long time ago. Please, let it go and move on. There is no evidence anywhere on planet Earth demonstrating a global flood occurred a few thousand years ago, and much evidence demonstrating that it didn't. Please be honest, have some integrity, and accept the data and evidence from planet Earth which indicates there was no Global flood.
You got that completely wrong. Dinasour fossils are found above the KT. Often severe winds have partly uncovered Dino fossils. Probably best to get your facts right before commenting.
Yep. It's such an astronomically absurd calculation, it has to be correct... even if radiometric dating has only been around for just over 100 years. lol
@@funkster007 Yes, earth rocks have been dated an absurd number of times -- many thousands. The age has been correlated among tests and also compared and confirmed with meteorite testing. The facts are undeniably at odds with the kindergarten interpretation of the Bible that is so prevalent today in the media. Why we keep hearing that stuff is anybody's guess.
What could also be mentioned that Genesis mentions "day and night" for each of those days. As far as I'm aware, "day and night" only refers to a 24-hour period on Earth, and I'm not aware of anything suggesting that this cycle was substantially longer than 24 hours or at least what is normally considered a 'day' in modern times.
It doesn't mean millions of years. Even in the Hebrew it's specific when it's says day meaning 24 hours. Scores of other statements in the Bible all use the same language and it's a 24 hour day. So yes there is no reason to think millions of years. It's just a way for gullible people to try to rationalize it and make themselves feel better. Yet it's kind of silly to think God created everything he did but couldn't do it in a short time frame.
@vikingskuld yeah why would God need all this time as if he isn't omnipotent. "Yom" in hebrew does mean time and can be interpreted in different ways but in this context the Bible makes it super clear to define what "Yom" is. Evening and Morning was a "Yom". So the translation to call it a day is accurate. Every single one of those 6 days of creation it repeatedly says that it was evening and morning. It was as if the Bible wanted to make it clear what exactly a day is. Its not a thousand years. Its not an indefinite eon of time. It is specific. It doesnt change its description when God creates the sun moon and stars. Its still evening and morning make a day. So how we view a day by using the sun to tell time lets us know that, that is what a day is. Then the commandments talks about this first week starting the weekly cycle which we see are 24 hour periods. Unfortunately, this is predicted. The wisdom of God is foolishness to man. Something so simple and repeated 6 times isn't believe, then how can one believe the rest of the Bible. It's sad.
@@mobulis that's nonsensical. sorry, but not is the word Bible in the Bible nor the word Trinity in The Bible. however once i began reading it it's understandable. and this earth will soon be put to an end also. we are in the last days. time to get right with God of this universe and confess with your mouth your sin, Jesus died on the cross for your personal sin as he did for myself and the whole world, Amen.
How do you explain breeding then? People have been breeding plants and animal for thousands of year. Go to the supermarket. Everything in there comes from human selections. Natural fruits and vegetables and animal don't look anything like that. We don't need millions of year to see change. Just a few decades. Probably even less.
Just imagine believing that the Earth is only a few thousand years old and ignoring or cherrypicking what "science" to believe or not to believe. I should start selling bridges to these people.
Just imagine believing that the Earth is millions of years old and ignoring or cherrypicking what the Creator said about Himself and us to believe or not to believe. "These people" aren't stupid, dont wait for the end of your self or Christ return to realize that.
@@ronniewagner5368 the ~6,000 year old earth has so many holes and contradicts the logic they try to use against scientists. I'll stick to my belief that we have yet to fully grasp the universe or our planet, but will continue to learn and stay open minded.
@@valdezfam If your a believer, your leaning "away" from scripture "toward" what man says. I lean "toward" the Bible and think that disciples of Christ should as well.... Here are some examples; I believe when Eve was made, she was capable of thinking, eating and reproducing..at one day old, although she may have looked 16 or 28 or 35, as soon as God made her. No "science" is capable of replicating that, testing that or theorizing how it may be true..... So if you are a believer, where do you start? Science won't prove Jesus resurrected Lazarus from the dead,, they could interview him,, watch him eat,, check his blood and heart rate...wouldn't help,, it was a supernatural event.. do you believe that? If so why that and not what the Bible says in face of what man assumes to be true? If God made Eve with age, why not the universe? If not, do you believe Christ rose from the dead? If so, why that and not Lazarus? If not, then your not a Christian, you got much bigger problems than how old the earth is. Where do you start to believe God? Chapter 11 of Genesis? The biggest problem with old earth is death before sin. If we evolved death was here before Adam, eliminating the fall because of sin and eliminating the need for Christ and His work for our salvation. The fall, the need for redemption, and God Himself can not be proven beyond looking at creation and realizing there was a Creator. God designed it that way so that salvation will be by what? By faith, the conviction of believing things unseen... If your a Christian You should be thinking on things like, why the tree in the garden? Why the animal covering as opposed to plant? Sovereignty of God and the responsibility of man... Why will Satan be released after the mill kingdom once he's bound.... We are told as Christ followers to make disciples (learners), not how we can reconcile the Bible with the theories of fallen men, no matter how smart our culture deems them to be. If your not a christian you have much worse difficulty to overcome, unless you can be everywhere in the universe at the same time from eternity past to eternity future, you can't prove God doesn't exist. It's logical if you think it thru.
This whole BELIEF falls apart when you consider the following: 1. Radiometric dating is undoubtable proof that earth is older than 6000 years old. 2. We have in fact observed evolution happening on bacteria and some insects, also on birds and reptiles on a much smaller scales. 3. Let's suppose that evolution is not real.. then you guys would have to explain a lot of things, because that would mean serious implications to several unrelated fields of Biology that all fall on the same conclusions all using different pieces of evidence, observations and experimentation. The main problem is the fossil record and genetics, as both of them serve the strongest evidence to back up evolution, in the fossil record having several different fossil from different species or group of animals that among many things show a clear evolutive timeline and how different traits developed and genetics as genetic sequencing and comparison further proves the genetic relation and the absolute ancestry between all living organisms, and that the closer we are in the taxonomic tree the more genetic similitudes we will have (let's remember also, that the taxonomic tree, the system of animal classification purely runs on evolution and if evolution isn't real then we would also have a problem with that, because for the taxonomic tree to be created a lot of other evidences and proofs of several more fields of science, some not even relating Biology came together)
Yeah it's odd that they always say we haven't observed it. We have. Over just 50 years we have dropped birds on a island, and come back to find they have grown extra body parts in their stomachs that help them digest the plants there. Creationists are a wild breed
Are they still birds though? They didn’t turn into fish and swim away. Adaptation is built into our genome but has boundaries that don’t allow evolution. Adaptation is seen all the time and is built into our DNA design. Evolution has never been documented or prove. Not one transitional animal dead or alive has been found and you should expect to see millions of them if the the theory, or belief I should call it, were true. Creationism is firstly based on an eyewitness account that can be tested and verified
Yay Ken ive never heard anyone else say that the “millions of years” being deliberately incomprehensible!!! No one seems to understand me when I say it 😂
*Deliberately* incomprehensible? So Ken Ham is a conspiracy theorist and thinks that the world's geologists and other scientists are all lying about the subject? Scientists do not simply pull figures like millions or billions out of their butts, you know that, right? Science is not about going to a job and making stuff up..
Asking people how they come to understand an incompressible amount of time ... Well, the Universe is of incomprehensible size with hundreds of billions of trillions of stars. Check out the evidence we can see with the Hubble and James Webb space telescopes and open your minds to enormity. Mind blowing... Creation is surely a similar Eternity...
The only reason you cling onto the young Earth notion is because it fits with your magical thinking. You have drawn a conclusion about the universe. Namely, that it was created by some kind of omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent thing. And you have to jam in nonsense to support this conclusion, despite the fact that you have no evidence for it.
We have literally seen wolves turn into both chihuahuas AND Great Danes within recent memory. We have the pedigree records of these dogs to prove it. Selection can alter an animal’s form dramatically.
How many billions (not millions) of years ago was it that the earth's atmosphere had no free oxygen? The earth existed, and it had an atmosphere, but the atmosphere had no free oxygen. How long ago was that? It was before any air breathing animals, obviously.
@@shipwright6122 i agree. science is a method for understanding the physical world through testing and verifying hypotheses. science is secular by nature.
@@shipwright6122 science is not a tool or a method that can possibly allow a 'divine foot' in the door. Science is only capable of studying the natural. Science cannot possibly address anything 'supernatural'. Many scientists are religious, or follow some sort of belief system, but they keep that separate from their work as scientists.. except for the scientists who write articles for sites such as AIG. Those scientists adhere to AIG's 'statement of faith'.. which means they aren't actually conducting proper science.
I always like to think of the scripture in Second Peter3:8 where it says that with the Lord a day is as a thousand years and a thousand years as a day. The six days time of Adam is almost over and Messiah is coming soon to redeem his people into the seventh day millennium of his kingdom!
So, you "put aside" the question whether those six days were ordinary days or millions of years, and came back to "if those were six ordinary days, the earth and universe are 6000 years old" - fade out. ???
If I didn’t see it rain last night, but I wake up in the morning and my street and grass are wet, I believe that’s circumstantial evidence it rained last night. Circumstantial evidence can prove a point just as convincingly as direct evidence can prove it. You need to explain that principle and deal with its consequences when arguing for a young earth. Thanks.
@@densincomprehend8879 It makes total sense. These guys are making the argument that because scientists were not there to observe something, their conclusions are suspect. My rain example makes the point that circumstantial evidence proves a point just as powerfully as watching it happen (direct evidence).
there are literally man made structures older than 6000 years. BTW its amazing how entire civilizations (china, egypt, india, central africa, peru, etc) lived right through noahs flood without a scratch, huh?
How do you know those man made structures are actually as old as you've been taught? How do you know they're using the right dating methods? There are many other dating methods which give younger dates that fit with Young Earth, mainstream academia just doesn't choose them
What would the evidence be? Billions of dead laid down in a SINGLE sedimentary rock layer that covered the entire globe. Something akin to the KT boundary which leaves a record in a single rock layer observable all over the earth with a clear geologic date.
How about not deleting my comment and the link to my YT video on the Biblical age of the universe. Instead, maybe watch it and tell me where it is incorrect, scientifically, or Biblically.
Theories about the age of the earth are wrong because we weren't there to observe. However, anything put forth is the Bible is true because we weren't there to observe all the events described in the Bible (um, wait a minute?)
The Bible was inspired by the one who created the Universe. The book of Genesis hasn't changed to suit some discovery. Old Earth however changed a lot.
@@themiataboy909 and you "know" this because someone told you so, or because you are able to communicate with the creator of the universe and said creator confirmed this for you?
Sean I suggest you come at this from the most recent point of view. Thousands of manuscripts that affirm that Jesus lived, died and rose from the dead. It's not difficult to believe the living and dying part, but it takes faith to believe the raised from the dead part. The miracle of DNA is just one unexplainable phenomenon that miracles. It's not hard to become a theist, but it's quite difficult to see your need for a Savior. Good luck mate.
There is a difference between create and make. Create means to form from nothing but make means to transform for service. The first day was with a pre existing universe. The 4th day was the day the purpose and authorship of the celestial bodies was announced not the day they were placed because there was a 4th day. If one says that God created rather than made everything in six days it creates a stumbling block to keep unbelievers from believing.
Sorry I don't believe the earth is only 6000 yrs old , Archeologists hv dug up below the earth surface both human and artifacts that say much different
He is wrong. Had he read and respected the bible, he would gave known that Adam was created in a second creation, so counting back to Adam doesn't give any information about the age of the earth.
"I can't comprehend it - So, it must be incomprehensible." Arrogant hubris based on a total misunderstanding of how evolution works - Just because Ken doesn't understand it - Does not make it false - Most of what he says is simply wrong - He's creating Straw Men left and right - "No one has ever seen one animal change into another animal" Evolution DOES NOT say that it does - That's a false claim based on a lack of understanding -
Your comment is about a month old, and not a single person has responded to it until now.. These people conveniently skip over uncomfortable comments on RUclips just like they conveniently skip over uncomfortable facts about reality that we learn through science.. (well, I guess in this case, those two things are one and the same.. anyway, thanks for the facts 👍)
@@lifeofbrilliance4494 it doesn't *say* anything. Anyway, where did you hear that evolution involved animals changing into different animals? If you're interested, just start by learning some of the basics with a simple online search Berkeley University has an excellent biology section on their site specifically set up to explain and answer the basic questions people have concerning biological evolution, so that would be a great place to start. You'll want to learn about natural selection, and things like Gene duplication, genetic drift, gene flow, horizontal Gene transfer; there's a lot to learn just to understand the basics, really.
@@lifeofbrilliance4494 here is a very brief, basic definition: 'Biological evolution is the change in inherited traits over successive generations in populations of organisms. Adaptation is a key evolutionary process in which variation in the fitness of traits and species are adjusted by natural selection to become better suited for survival in specific ecological habitats' -- sciencedirect
@@lifeofbrilliance4494 It says that over periods of time the whole population gradually evolves to respond to the environmental pressures they live with - If those changes are helpful for survival then those creatures will survive - If the changes are not helpful - The creatures will not live to reproduce - Survival of the fittest is not about who is the biggest and strongest - It is about being the most fit to survive and thrive under given circumstances - Some folks seem to think evolutions says that at some point a couple of monkeys gave birth to a modern human - That's not at all what evolution claims - Humans and other Modern Apes come from one of those groups - We share common ancestry - and We are still apes - Still evolving - The other apes in our tree are still evolving too - In parallel - Not directly from oner to the other - And over millions of years - Not in a single birth event - And again - It's not about individuals but the whole population of a given species -
Why would Richard Dawkins go berserk? What happened to the idea that the six days of creation might not have been just days? Would you not return to it? You haven't made me crazy, just bored. You are wrong, missing essential knowledge that is generally accepted and proven. What is your point? Proving that you don't understand logic and science?
@@JonS Thank him for sharing the right perspective of looking at the world and it's history. If there is anyone lying it's the mainstream science community, with there inaccurate dating methods and their absolutely absurd evolution theory.
@@johnlewis8934 whether it benefits him or not, he is a chronic liar when it comes to science related topics. (It benefits him :-) young-earth creationist books, ark encounter, Creation 'Museum', etc..)
i mean truth that the world is millions of years old. lying is a sin grind, and the secular gnostic science HAS been doing that for decades now. moreover the blood al disorder has also rebelled terribly against God. and satans doom is sure!
Ken Ham is a young earth zealot. The age of the earth has nothing to do with our salvation and his interpretation of the scriptures is not a sound doctrine you must believe in.
@@chrisyoung9653 Yes. Truth upset me at first but then I realized it was really what I needed to hear. The hardest thing I’ve ever done was change my mind. I needed God’s help. 🙏🏼✝️
@@shipwright6122 As I said before. Kent Ham’s interpretation is not something one must believe in order to be a Christian. The age of the Earth has absolutely nothing to do with Truth which leads to salvation or freedom. Truth is Jesus Christ Himself, and He is the one that sets us free. And as a Christian who has his own mind, I do not agree with Ken Ham. Genesis 1:2 is represented in 2 Peter 3:5. God did not create the earth in darkness and then said “let there be light”. Genesis 1:2 is not the beginning stages of an unfinished Creative process. The Heaven and the Earth was originally created in Genesis 1:1. Then in Genesis 1:2 the earth was “standing out of the water and in the water” as it was destroyed through judgement. The Earth BECAME without form and void. If you read 2 Peter in context, you will see that Peter was not referring to the flood In Noah’s day. There is a contrast between the “heavens were of old” and the “heavens and the earth WHICH ARE NOW”. The flood in Noah’s day had absolutely no affect on the heavens above. The fake model of a “water canopy” did not exist and had nothing to do with the flood in Noah’s day. The flood waters came from under the earth, and it was only after the fountains of the deep broke, then the windows of heaven opened. Meaning powerful geysers erupted into the earth’s atmosphere which caused it to rain for the first time. Why is the water canopy false? The waters above the firmament did not only form the earth’s atmosphere but it also include outer space. For God placed the sun, moon and the stars within that same FIRMAMENT that was formed when God separated the waters. And as we all know, the sun, moon and stars are not residing within the earth’s atmosphere. Psalms 148:4 mentions the waters above the heavens. Those who falsely claim the earth was flooded by the waters above the firmament which they say created a water canopy, are dead wrong according to Psalms. Those waters are still above the heavens. When Peter says “the heavens and the earth “which are now” he was referring to Genesis 1:3-31. This is when the Lord began the restoration process. Which means the earth is both old and young at the same time. Therefore I reject Ken Ham’s interpretation.
The flood caused their extinction I believe. Marine life found buried with hundreds of dinosaurs. Also most dinosaur graveyards in us is inland almost as if they were trying to escape the flood coming.
From an early age I’ve always thought the Bible was factually incorrect but metaphorically true in many ways. The problem is that if the Bible can lie about one thing it can lie about everything. I try to seek truth and not ideology.
Thank God there’s not one lie in the Bible. Scientists the majority being naturalistic often cannot prove their theories are true yet are willing to risk their whole life on something they can’t prove with an absolute certainty Many Scientists are basing their conclusions on Secular interpretations of present day observations YET call Christian’s crazy for believing in a creator that they say cannot be proven with an absolute certainty .. the contradiction in that .. when are they going to admit that they KNOW nothing more than they accuse us falsely of not knowing ? While they ignore the very undeniable evidence of both prophetic fulfillment and archeological findings as well as the actual historically recorded miracles of Jesus. They’ll believe in an uncreated bang but not an uncreated God.. their hypocrisy is seen plainly and their eyes are blinded by it.
The Bible is not factually incorrect about anything. Men are, though. If you find your worldview conflicts with the worldview taught in the Bible, research the matter fully with an open mind (and remember not to blindly believe the current consensus of mainstream academia like a religious text) and you'll realize there are actually a lot of false views being taught to the public as science when they're actually just false Naturalistic philosophies posing as science
Hi. Nice one Ray, you're onto it, the Bible can indeed lie. It was adulterated by Rome. Literalists ignore that Jesus spoke in parables order to obscure truth, not to expose it. That's dishonest. (Matt 13:13), and (Mark 4:10-12). This is why his disciples often asked him to explain his parables. Another lie, (a half-truth actually), is (Luke 16:10), where Jesus concludes that "people who are honest (faithful) in small things, are honest in big things". It's true sometimes, but Jesus completely ignores that con-men are deliberately honest in small things in order to gain your trust and rip you off in big things. Jesus' spouts a half-truth that help crooks and disadvantages honest people. His weasel words conclude a parable about a dishonest steward whom Jesus commends. Christians have a great deal of trouble explaining this parable, and so they should. Truth can only be found by intellectual honest people, which you seem to be. We can be perfectly honest (in principle it's possible), and perfect honesty has a perfect relationship with truth, which is God. Honesty is the Holy Spirit of God. So keep seeking truth, and I'll leave you with one of Jesus' true sayings, "know the truth, and the truth shall make you free". (John 8:32) Cheers, P.R.
@@tiffsaver “Fundamentalist” the word is not in the Bible…..6000 yrs not in the Bible….the number 6 in the Bible…extract. Many people (primarily Jewish religious leaders), toward the end of Christ Jesus’ ministry ..believed he was guilty of political subversion / blasphemy a total of 6 people, however, are recorded as stating that he was innocent of all the charges leveled against him. The 6 people who found Christ innocent were Roman Prefect of Judea Pontius Pilate (Luke 23:14), Herod (Luke 23:15), Judas (after the devil left him - Matthew 27:3), Pontius Pilate's wife (Matthew 27:19), one of the thieves on the cross next to Christ (Luke 23:41) and a Roman Centurion who was at the crucifixion (Luke 23:47)…..
We are about to go into the 7 thousandth year, the 1000 year reign! 2 Peter 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
@@betsieswartz Bible doesnt claim to be scientific. it is historical and can be verified historically from outside accounts. science is based on direct observations. thus by definition, the theory you believe in is unscientific. "Are you really going to say that every fossil beyond that has been dated past 6,000 years ago is untrue?" looks like you dont know the difference between direct observational evidence and indirect evidence. please take a basic science course
@@betsieswartz we can directly observe transitional species in the fossil record, which is direct evidence" no, this is direct observations of indirect evidence. like I said please take a basic science course.
@@betsieswartz The B clearly doesn’t state anything scientific, because creation and many other things can be directly disproven." Why would it state anything scientific? it is a history. "Also, paleontology and evolutionary biology are absolutely sciences..." science is based on direct observations. paleontology and evolutionary biology are not based on direct observations. they are not science. they are historical science.
iam astonished at the ignorance and scoffers in these comments just as the Bible tells us would occur. don't listen then, or rather, i pray for your discernement all you who come here simply to attack and jeer with empty atgument 🙏🏼📖🗡🇮🇱⏰
I used to be a hardcore creationist. Studied the science as much as possible. I watched Ken Ham as a kid; met him at an event (in Cleveland, I believe). I also loved Kent Hovind, AKA “Dr. Dino.” And to this day, I cannot believe I actually fell for it. This is a cult, and it’s harmful to the progression of science. There are so many flaws in creationism. Granted, their are flaws in the current model of evolution as well. The difference is, modern day evolutionists can at least say, “well, we don’t know the answer quite yet, but we will keep researching, and trust the scientific process.” Meanwhile, creationists just say, “well, we don’t know the answer, but we trust that God already knows the answer.” It’s harmful to science, and harmful to the kids that are taught creationism. Tell me, where in the Bible does it mention the horrendous natural disasters that have happened throughout our history? Mass extinctions have come about through ice ages, massive volcanic events, climate change, and the most well known, the Chicxulub impact. Where in the Bible does it mention the 6 mile wide asteroid that smashed into the Yucatán peninsula? We know there is a crater there, almost 100 miles wide. That event was so powerful, air temperatures around the globe reached hundreds of degrees. It burned any living thing above ground. Fire and rock rained down around the entire globe. The only GLOBAL disaster mentioned in the Bible is Noah’s Ark, and there is no possible way it was connected to that asteroid impact. (However, Noah’s ark could possibly be explained by a smaller asteroid that struck the Indian Ocean, causing immense coastal flooding…but certainly not global flooding). The pieces just don’t add up. We know that there are countless events in history that would have been recorded in the Bible, because given the severity, the people would have assumed it was judgement from God. For example, stories of raining fire and brimstone exist, and everyone thought it was “Yahweh’s” doing. When in fact, it was most likely a smaller volcanic eruption. So, if they took the time to record that, why would they not record massive global disasters? I should also add in the KT boundary caused by the asteroid impact…that separation of life below vs life above entirely debunks the notion that humans ever existed with dinosaurs, and we were in fact separated by quite some time. (However, it needs to be said that if any of you truly believe dinosaurs and humans EVER coexisted, I doubt you’ll be able to grasp any of the concepts I mention in this entire comment) REAL science follows a process. We obtain all of the evidence, and come to a rational theory. Creationists assume they already KNOW the conclusion, and try desperately to find evidence for it. That’s not how science works, people. Folks, don’t fall for this stuff. Honestly, I would beg you to leave religion in general. But since people have a tendency to gravitate toward wishful thinking, that’s unlikely. So I would AT LEAST ask you to leave creationism and young earth theory. Sure, maybe there IS a god. We won’t know until we’re dead. But that god CLEARLY uses natural processes to shape history. Faith may “move mountains,” but it doesn’t cure cancer. It doesn’t put people on the moon, or lessen global warming. SCIENCE does all of that. And that same science tells us that the earth is at least 4 billion years old, and has seen amazing things that happened long before the arrival of modern man.
I've seen lots of times where scientists throw out evidence because it conflicts with their beliefs. Ever seen the footprints of dinos and man in the same strata? There is a whole field of objects called "ooparts" (out of place artifacts) that don't make "scientific" sense. Like the many modern objects found in coal mines etc... For all we know, Noah's flood could have been the result of an asteroid impact. No - science can be just as much of a "cult" as anything else trying to explain where we came from and where we are going....
Ok. I agree with you because God says a thousand days is as a year and a year as is a thousand days. But there has to be a God. Look at how well every creature’s body is designed and how everything keeps a system and time. And the Bible says that God knows the future. So God knows the patterns of earth -what will happen in nature - and plan accordingly. And I’m sure the Creator can also set things in motion to make events happen as well. P.s. I’m only here because I got hate from some other Christian today saying I hate God for not being a young earther. Sigh. Most who claim to be Christians either aren’t or don’t realize how hateful they can be too.
_"If the Bible gave a date of creation, that would be a problem. If the Bible give a date of creation, then it would have a mistake in it, and it would be fallible"_ And then you go on to derive a date of creation from the Bible. So you are saying that the Bible has a mistake in it, and it is fallible?
Some characters are omitted in the old testament genealogies because only people of note are mentioned, not every single descendant. But yes, even if all of them were mentioned it would probably not add up to millions of years.
Don't Christians also look at God's work, you know, nature, instead of just reading words in the book? Didn't God create nature? Can we not also learn about God's work by studying nature, as well as reading the Bible?
@@travisbicklepopsicle The Bible also speaks of God putting His word above even His name. So while yes a person can look at nature and learn from it His holy word has precedence over nature. Let God be true and every man a liar.
@@charlesfuller2998 Just curious why you care? I mean, you are here making comments in the chat, so this topic appears to be something of importance to you.
@@tzgardner I refuse to live in a world where people actually go against science and believe the earth is 6000 years old. This is ridiculous. It’s 2022. And people actually believe this stuff after watching a RUclips video.
Hi. Yep, once it's up and running you"ll have a nice little business. Tee shirts to sell, cafe, accommodation, even the flat earthers make a pile out of their nicely packaged twaddle. Way to go, Mecca, Jerusalem, it's always been about milking pilgrims. Cheer$, P.R.
Please, the Bible mentions the Flood, but there is no mention of Chicxulub impact crater for the earlier and far larger Deniliquin impact crater. No mention of the formation of the Moon by impact with Earth. Please when do these appear in young Earth models?
@@2l84me8 yes it takes faith to believe that the names and ages that are mentioned are true. Same as it takes faith to believe our history textbooks I school.
@@waynejamel6703 Wrong for multiple reasons. Faith is not a virtue nor a reliable pathway to truth. Literally anything can be taken on faith. Historical documents must be credible and consistent, which is what we can observe and verify. Mundane history and outrageous claims regarding religions and magic are not 2 halves of the same coin.
@@2l84me8 and look at how all the many books collected in the Bible are aligned and consistent with each other. I'm not trying to convince you. I am making point for believers in the Bible. I'm not sure if you believe in the Bible. But those who believe in the Bible should simply believe that when the Bible says that a day was an evening and morning to take that literally. Why pick and choose what we believe in the Bible
Welllll, tholins on Sedna, Makemake and Pluto dwarf planets take long to form in a lab in small amounts, if ya scale it up and include radiation speed of heat and approaimate time of formation, ya get a reaaaaaly old pluto and sedna and makemake, genesis says earth is older than those, therefore, earth is old.
I kinda agree. See time is determined by how things degrade. Degrading only happens if sin has already corrupted creation. So since Adam's sin it has been roughly 6,ooo yrs. We don't know how long Adam was in the garden & remember Adam was created sowhere else & moved to the Garden. So we don't know exactly how old the Earth is. My opinion Adam was around a couple hundred yrs before Eve ever arrived. And then, he had to teach her everything he did & the names of all the animals, plants, fish, fruits, nuts, ect. My hope in our original parents (giving them a lot of credit) the earth before sin till now id about 10,000 yrs.
I’ll stick to the 6k yr old earth. Makes more sense with the 6 to 1 ratio. 6 day work with 1 day rest. 6 year till the land with 1 year land rest. 6k year of human history and 1k as the Millennial kingdom of Christ on earth.
I have heard theory and I stress it is only theory nothing really to back it up so take it with a grain of salt - That Adam was probably in the Garden of Eden for 33.5 years as being a picture of Jesus living a sinless perfect life and then taking the sin of the world upon Himself. Adam willfully took of the fruit for Eve's sake being a picture of Jesus taking on the sin of the earth. Eve may have been created the last .5 years thus being naive and not having the experiences that Adam had and thus was easier to be deceived. Again I stress this is only a theory I have heard - take it or leave it.
Saying it takes millions or billions of years is a cop out for scientist. Thats a really big theory. They throw big numbers because they think people wont question it. You got a degree so i have to believe you.
But the Earth is Flat, we live in a snow globe-type earth, an enormous pond with a dome over us like the bible says, so it's not a Planet, but a plane!
I believe in creation, but there are two big flaws in this hypothesis. Firstly, if you take the account in the bible as being literal, God told Adam that in the day he ate of the fruit he should surely die. Adam lived to be nearly a thousand years old….. seems to point to the idea that a “day” to God is about a thousand earth years. So if God created the earth in six of His days it would be six thousand of our years. Then there is the fact that we dont know how long Adam and Eve were living in the Garden before they fell from grace…….. They could have been in there for many days…… Secondly, it seems that assuming God created the universe at the same time as the earth make the whole creation process very earth centric, like the old idea of the earth being at the centre of everything. It makes the earth the only planet with any of God’s creations on it in a vast empty universe. Why would God go to all that trouble to make empty galaxies billions of lightyears away and never use them. The fact is the universe is billions of years old because it is full of earths just like us. God’s creations are without end and the idea that this earth is the only one is limiting God’s creation. This earth is not the first and it wont be the last of God’s creations, but the earth is quite young….. perhaps 12 thousand years, or slightly more. The earth was not created in the place where it is now, and when it says God placed the stars in the heavens, it is describing the time the earth was moved to its current location orbiting our star, and it will be moved again when Christ returns.
Between Billions of billions of billions of years ago.........................................................................................................................................................to 2022 (this year I'm typing this) we would have seen an example of species evolving to New species by now!!
@@indistructi-bill9770 Non avian dinosaurs to avian dinosaurs, the finches Darwin based his whole theory on, therapsids into modern mammals, Guanlong to T-Rex, to name a few.
(Disclaimer, this is not a hate comment, more of an explanation) So evolution HAS been proven to exist, looking at the embryo of different animals (Including human) They look very much alike, this is not a coincidence if it's based off of evolution. Everything that happens is a slow process that includes evolution. Bones have been found proven to be millions of years, and they have been proven to be descendants from animals we have today. We also have several organs that don't serve any purpose, but did when we're still in our hunting stages till about 12,000 years ago. The example I'm trying to give is our third eyelid, we don' t use it ANYMORE, but we did when we were hunting 50,000 years ago. The appendix is also a great example with people living healthy lives without it. Also, not to mention, being all decedents from 2 people would mean that we are all a result of inbreeding, which is a sin (according to the bible). Everything takes, time it doesn't just happen like that. Not to mention that Christians also use time as their hero. Noah took about 120 years to build the ark, that's more than about any human has lived before. So to make up for that they made Noah crazily old, I'm talking almost a millennia old. It couldn't' t have been shorter because the technology wasn't there to build it faster considering it's over 140 meters long 24 meters wide and 14 meters tall, it's crazy stuff. Once again, this is not hate, I'm just pointing out what I find the most reasonable answer. The earth being 6000 years old I find unbelievable. Since there is so much evidence older than 6000 years old.
God made the earth and heavens in 6 days. So that means he also made all the stars and galaxies in 6 days. Say the Earth is roughly 6k years old according to the Bible. How did the light from a star millions of light years away be seen in our night sky , if the earth is only 6k years old?
I've heard three theories on this. I sought it out because I had the same question. One is that light doesn't travel the same speed both directions. Dr. Jason Lyle is a proponent of this. It sounds odd, but veritasium actually did a video about this concept, and he wasn't addressing the age of the universe at all, since he is a nihilist. Another theory is the spreading of the universe like a canvas would have caused a riple that would fall outside time so there was a timeless window on the day God created the stars and light travelled in that time that wasn't measured by time. The most viable theory I've heard (and accept) is that light has been slowing down and used to travel much faster. There has been so much evidence of this until recently when they started measuring light with an atomic clock, which is subject to the same slowing as light. If you are interested in this, look up Barry Setterfield GSR on RUclips. He has a video about light and the formation of the universe. He has been able to run the math and timeline where all the major events like meter craters, flood of Noah, fossils etc all fit a cohesive timeline
@@cameronnebe stars are still forming, galaxies are still forming.. the universe is very dynamic and in a constant state of change. The Milky Way produces an average of about 7 stars per year. Remember they go through life cycles; they live and die. Once iron production begins in the core.. boom! Supernova:-) Of course not all stars explode; depends on the class of star, mass, all that stuff.
Hey sir thanks for your opinion but um, uh you shouldn't be lying and please dont sin (9th commandment) at least you said you believe that which is just a personal truth. Look up molecular clocks and how that correlates with the fossil record. Im sure you will deny it though but even Darwin had faith in God.
The key here, though, is that those 6 days are likely not “regular” 24 hour days because those are based on the Earth rotating around the Sun. Before the creation, the Sun and Earth were not there yet in order to have 24 hour days.
But they _were_ "regular" 24-hour days, because there was the distinction made of each day beginning in the morning and ending in the evening, with each day being numbered 1-7.
I would like to share with you the gospel of our salvation in the dispensation of God's grace. “Grace can be defined as the undeserved favor of God for people who deserve His condemnation.” God does not hold sins against us because they have already been paid for (every sin for every person.) Christ was made to be everyone's-every-sin (2 Corinthians 5:21). However, full reconciliation is not achieved until an individual "reconciles himself" to God (2 Corinthians 5:20). This happens upon belief of the gospel of our salvation. All humanity is forgiven but not all believe it. Being forgiven does not equal being saved, salvation comes by faith. Salvation is appropriated by faith, forgiveness of sins is NOT. Your sins were forgiven regardless of your belief. God did not need your faith at Calvary, He only needed His Son. SALVATION is only gained by trusting Christ - via belief in the word of truth (the gospel of our salvation.) Salvation IS by works, just not our own. It is not of ourselves, but through the gift of God's grace that we are saved. Upon HEARING the gospel, if we BELIEVE the gospel, we are sealed with the holy Spirit of promise unto the day of redemption (Ephesians 1:13-14). A lost soul can only be saved by trusting Christ to have done everything necessary for our salvation though His finished cross-work. Romans thru Philemon are the only books in the bible that explain salvation for today. In those books we find salvation is by faith alone, in Christ alone, without-any-works-of-any-kind-at-anytime. Christ died for your sins, and has risen for your justification (1 Corinthians 15:1-4) Put your faith in what He did rather than what you have done, are doing, or are going to do. Salvation is not getting-your-sins-forgiven, it's believing they already are. (2 Corinthians 5:19) Truth Time Radio, also on youtube and facebook, is here to help you better understand your bible and better articulate your faith to others.
I got my hopes up when I saw the cover image for this video saying "Earth is __________________" (since I thought this channel was going to stop suspiciously ignoring Flat Earth) but then I saw the word "old" and the CGI globe beneath it and remembered this is controlled opposition
The Earth is round. It is very ignorant at this point to say it’s flat. The evidence for this is endless, but for any simpleton, all you have to do is look at the clouds. They form a dome shape around the Earth and look like they are lower and in front of you when looking at the horizon (when doing this on the ocean, it looks like the clouds are “touching” the water in the horizon) If the Earth was flat you would see a straight line of clouds above as far as the eye could see, followed by black space, which would indicate where the Earth’s “edge” would be.
@AnnaSanclement Let's take a look at what prominent scientists have to say about whether your observation works to verify the Heliocentric model over competing options, shall we? *There is no planetary observation by which we on Earth can prove that the Earth is moving in an orbit around the sun* Physicist, I. Bernard Cohen *Whether the Earth rotates once a day from west to east...or the heavens revolve once a day from east to west...the observable phenomena will be exactly the same. This shows a defect in Newtonian dynamics since an empirical science ought not to contain a metaphysical assumption, which can never be proved or disproved by observation* - Physicist, Dennis Sciama *People need to be aware that there is a range of models that could explain the observations. For instance, I can construct you a universe with Earth at its center, and you cannot disprove it based on observations. You can only exclude it on philosophical grounds. What I want to bring into the open is the fact that we are using philosophical criteria in choosing our models. A lot of cosmology tries to hide that.* Physicist, George F.R. Ellis *So, which is real, the Ptolemaic or Copernican system? Although it is not uncommon for people to say that Copernicus proved Ptolemy wrong, that is not true...one can use either picture as a model of the universe, for our observations of the heavens can be explained by assuming either the earth or the sun to be at rest* Physicist, Stephen Hawking *The struggle, so violent in the early days of science, between the views of Ptolemy and Copernicus would then be quite meaningless. Either CS (Coordinate System) could be used with equal justification. The two sentences, the sun is at rest and the earth moves, or the sun moves and the earth is at rest, would simply mean two different conventions concerning two different CS* - Physicist, Albert Einstein *Let it be understood at the outset that it makes no difference, from the point of view of describing planetary motion, whether we take the Earth or the Sun as the center of the solar system. Since the issue is one of relative motion only, there are infinitely many exactly equivalent descriptions referred to different centers - in principle any point will do, the Moon, Jupiter...So the passions loosed on the world by the publication of Copernicus' book, De revolutionibus orbium caelestium libri VI, were logically irrelevant* - Astronomer, Fred Hoyle *we can take either the Earth or the Sun, or any other point for that matter, as the center of the solar system. This is certainly so for the purely kinematical problem of describing the planetary motions. It is also possible to take any point as the center even in dynamics, although recognition of this freedom of choice had to await the present century* - Astronomer, Fred Hoyle *It is possible to describe the entire universe using any chosen point as the unmoving center - the Earth will do very well - and no one can prove that choice is wrong....Scientists today prefer to picture everything in motion and nothing as being the center. If you haven't given much thought to the implications of twentieth-century science, you may be chagrined...to realize that because of the concept of relative motion, no one can prove that the Earth moves* - Kitty Ferguson *Thus we may return to Ptolemy's point of view of a 'motionless Earth' This would mean that we use a system of reference rigidly fixed to the Earth in which all stars are performing a rotational motion with the same angular velocity around the Earth's axis...one has to show that the transformed metric can be regarded as produced according to Einstein's field equations, by distant rotating masses. This has been done by Thirring. He calculated a field due to a rotating, hollow, thick-walled sphere and proved that inside the cavity it behaved as though there were centrifugal and other inertial forces usually attributed to absolute space. Thus, from Einstein's point of view, Ptolemy and Copernicus are equally right. What point of view is chosen is a matter of expediency* - Physicist, Max Born "The ancient argument over whether the Earth rotates or the heavens revolve around it (as Aristotle taught) is seen to be no more than an argument over the simplest choice of a frame of reference. Obviously, the most convenient choice is the universe....Nothing except inconvenience prevents us from choosing the Earth as a fixed frame of reference....If we choose to make the Earth our fixed frame of reference, we do not even do violence to everyday speech. We say that the sun rises in the morning, sets in the evening; the Big Dipper revolves around the North Star. Which point of view is "correct"? Do the heavens revolve or does the Earth rotate. The question is meaningless."- Physicist, Martin Gardner *the Earth-centered system...is in reality absolutely identical with the system of Copernicus and all computation of the places of the planets are the same for the two systems* - Astronomer, J. L. E. Dryer "...it is very important to acknowledge that the Copernican theory offers a very exact calculation of the apparent movements of the planets...even though it must be conceded that, from the modern standpoint practically identical results could be obtained by means of a somewhat revised Ptolemaic system....It makes no sense, accordingly, to speak of a difference in truth between Copernicus and Ptolemy: both conceptions are equally permissible descriptions. What has been considered as the greatest discovery of occidental wisdom, as opposed to that of antiquity, is questioned as to its truth value."- Physicist, Hans Reichenbach “Such a condition would imply that we occupy a unique position in the universe, analogous, in a sense, to the ancient conception of a central Earth…This hypothesis cannot be disproved, but it is unwelcome and would only be accepted as a last resort in order to save the phenomena. Therefore we disregard this possibility…. the unwelcome position of a favored location must be avoided at all costs…. such a favored position is intolerable…” Edwin Hubble "In order for the Earth to be at rest in the center of the system of the sun, planets, and comets, there is required both universal gravity and another force in addition that acts on all bodies equally according to the quantity of matter in each of them and is equal and opposite to the accelerative gravity with which the Earth tends to the sun...And thus celestial bodies can move around the Earth at rest, as in the Tychonic system."- Physicist, Isaac Newton *I have come to believe that the motion of the Earth cannot be detected by any optical experiment* - Physicist, Albert Einstein
@AnnaS1371 Did my post above show? I'm just curious if it's visible. I listed numerous prominent scientists explaining why we can't verify the Heliocentric model through observation YT has a pattern of randomly not showing important posts from FEers.
Saving repentance is realizing that you are a sinner deserving of God's just punishment in Hell and turn (repent) from whatever you trusted in before, if indeed you trusted in anything; to trusting in the person and finished work of Christ alone for salvation.
Sumerian civilization first took form in southern Mesopotamia around 4000 BCE-or 6000 years ago-which would make it the first urban civilization in the region. 6000 years ago doesn't mark the creation of Earth, but the destruction and fall of mankind.
For Adam was eternal before the fall and lived only 930 years as a mortal. On the cosmic scale acquiring the knowledge of 'good and evil' came forth only murder, civil inequalities, and weapons of mass destruction. THE END
@@israelcarrasco6777 no human being ever lived to be 900 + years old. Come on, man. Think. People live longer lives now than they did in the past. We know from genetics, anthropology, and other fields that humans never lived to be multiple hundreds of years old. Data and evidence don't lie. Your interpretation of ancient texts is simply wrong, at least regarding humans living to be hundreds of years old.
God created everything in His mind in eternity past. He put it all in real matter, real time in the first six days of ' time '. He set it all in motion in the first six days.
Perhaps. But there are hundreds of some species. Why would it be such a sin to believe one day is as a thousand years like the Bible says? Not saying you said it’s a sin, but some people do say that and say people hate God because they disagree with your opinion. But at least you believe God thought it all out. All the young earth ears I have heard or read comments of all thing God thought up and created everything in seven days without thinking it all out before.
@@reflectionsinthebible3579 the ' day as a thousand years ' refers to God being outside of time. A day having as much stuff in it as a thousand years. Knowing all the details of millions and even billions of people all at the same time would relate to a thousand years worth of things , of happenings, of living occurring in the space of one day. At the same time, the ' thousand years as one day ' refers to God being eternal and in the endless eternity of God the real ' time ' span of creation and the physical universe is but a drop in the bucket. It is like yesterday when it is past. The way we might look at one day out of last month is the way God can look at a thousand years.
@@betsieswartz the Bible. It doesn't say any of it in detail, it just says things were created within a six day time span. You can do with it like you want. Myself I like to take into account how the Creator God is eternal and outside of time. He lives in a timeless, matterless realm. Time and matter are His creation. Even empty vacuum of space is a creation of His. Even empty space light- years away from us is a place where the elements can exist and light and gravity Before He created anything material there was not even a single hydrogen atom nor even the place to put it or even the SCIENCE for it to exist. You might ask where does it say this in the Bible, well it doesn't spell it out in detail but it does say that ' without Him there was nothing made that was made ' or similar. I suppose the Creator could have both thought everything up and created it in real matter as well in an instant, but I like to think that in the timeless realm of eternity past He gave it all a considerable amount of thought. Also the thoughts of trying to create beings that will fellowship and love Him with free wills to do so will require a lot of painfull possibilities. Being ' all- knowing ' the Creator had to know how everything and everyone would turn out in advance, even knowing how the SON would have to sacrifice for everyone before a single thing was ever created. It's hard to fathom the mind of God.
I'm a believer in Christ Jesus, No I do not believe in evolution (evil-ution); but I believe that the Earth is much older than 6-7 thousand years old, not because of science. Genesis 1:1 says (in the beginning), it does not state when the beginning was. And from my understanding the original text does not read (in the beginning). Secondly where is the darkness and the flood upon the Earth in Genesis 1:2? Could this be the kingdom of darkness casting it's fallen shadow on the earth, (the beginning of the deep state). Why was the Earth in a flooded state? 2 Peter 3:5-6, this is not the flood in Noah's day of Genesis 7-9; also referenced by Peter in 1 Peter 3:20. The scientist say that the universe is 13.7 billions years old don't know if it is or not and they probably don't know either. Either way we are here in TIME for a short time trust in the Lord Jesus He is our Only hope. Additionally I believe that the Earth's fossil record speaks to generations of the earth.
To be fair though, there is the issue of not knowing whether the 6-day creation period is actually 24 hours each. especially if you pick other passages of the scriptures, 'a day' can be 'thousand years'. So you could even go and claim that the 6-day period actually were 6000 years, which would make the Earth 12.000 years old. But it's also 'interesting' that the entire creation process in Genesis is called 'the day god created etc etc'. Not day-S in plural, but DAY. The thing here is that regardless whether evolution would be a false and incorrect teaching in atleast the case of the age of the Earth, let's be honest and also admit that there neither is undeniable proof the Earth is created in just 6 days.
The oldest copy of the Tanakh (Old Testament) known today is the greek translation, called Septuaginta. The Book of Genesis was written down around 350 B.C. This means that Septuaginta's Genesis predates the Masoretic Bible, which is read by most people today, by about 1350 years. The Septuaginta adds an additional 650 years to the age of the patriarchs from Shem to Serug when they have their first son. This means that the earth or the universe is about 6650 years old. In Jesus' day EVERYONE (including Flavius Josephus, all New Testament writers, etc.) followed the Septuagint or the origin Hebrew scriptures (which were unfortunately lost) at the time by which it was translated. Even the writings of Qumran have more in common with the Septuagint than with our contemporary Masoretic Bible.
![Megan Thee Stallion - Neva Play (feat. RM) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TpYTyAaTRts/mqdefault.jpg)
Wow comments aren't disabled... something is fishy here.
Not disabled but closely monitored to delete anything reasonable that disagrees with them. They keep deleting my scientifically solid RUclips video on the age of the universe, Genesis and the Bigbang. :-(
@@head_banger the Big Bang theory the scientist themselves have already said is incorrect. Lol
@@kuiama23Ya thats what the headlines say. Bigbang theory still holds, albeit universes appeared way earlier than originally thought.
@@head_banger and Stephen Hawkings said it was string theory. But flipflops on that.
So beyond the universe creation. I'm sure u can explain how one dinosaur evolved to a completely different looking and size dinosaur...with absolutely no fossil records to show the extreme transitions that would have to have had occured for them to get to the different kind of dinosaur. Much less turn into a bird. Lmbo.
If it was a Big Bang. God did it
God measures in days before he makes the sun now that’s impressive
There are thousands of religions each one with it's own creation myth. Since you haven't proven that your creation myth is true how do you know that one of the other creation myths that lies out there isn't the true creationi myth?
Would he even admit that if he were brought up in a different country or time and was taught a different creation myth from a very young age he'd believe in that other creation myth?
Do you want people to speak a language where they are incapable of refuting your assertions?
There will only ever be one truth. Say there’s a tree. One person says its blue the other yellow. It’ll never change the true color of the tree which is green.
You know what's so hilarious about people talking about a 'creator' and 'intelligent design' and all that stuff? The just don't read their bibles! In Genesis there is no mention of a 'intelligent designer', designing all the wonderful stuff around us, no there is just the mention of a .... drumroll.... magician or wizard!
Read for yourself! This 'God' only speaks, he says 'THE MAGIC WORDS' like 'let there be light', 'let the earth be full of...' etcetera. And when he creates Adam, he takes clay from the ground, makes a figurine and breathes life into it's nostrils... That's no friggin' design, that's MAGIC, that's more like voodoo. God is introduced to us in the bible as this omnipotent magician or wizard, not a designer, let alone an intelligent designer.
So 'intelligent design' falls flat on it's face, is dead on arrival from the viewpoint of 'biblical christians' because it does not in any means reflect the way God is introduced in the bible itself! Hilarious!
Intelligent design is per definition at odds with the biblical account of creation!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
That's the most ridiculous word salad that I have read today!
God is the intelligent designer!
Your education is lacking!😂
How is that voodoo if he didn’t sacrifice anyone or anything like these satanic people who kill children or animals etc. God did not make nothing wrong when he created everything, everything was perfect with no flaws.
Why is it important for a belief in God and a Divine Essence in the World and Universe, to have Creation take place 6,000 years ago based on genealogy with people hundreds of years old plus dinosaurs thrown in to this time scale?
Why?
Why when you were born on the ancient island continent of Australia would you chuck out the evidence of the animals unique to Tasmania with separated from the mainland 15,000 years ago, plus kangaroos, koalas and platypus on the mainland and Aboriginal culture of over 50,000 years?
To say your book was irrefutable?
Why is this a valid interpretation of scripture and not wishful thinking that destroys credibility??
Can you give an answer to the KT boundary? No dinosaurs above it, & no humans below it.
THANK YOU. The severity of the event would have been recorded in the Bible, undoubtedly. Any living thing above ground was cooked alive and beaten by falling rock shortly after impact. Yet the only global disaster in the Bible is Noah’s Ark…and that could not have possibly been connected to the KT event.
@Soldier Many dinosaurs especially had air sacs in their bodies that provided a source of buoyancy, so that explanation does not make any sense. How do you explain how smaller species, such as Fruitadens (a small ornithopod), was discovered in a rock formation (Morrison Formation )that underlied the rock formation (Cedar Mountain Formation) that a large brachiosaurid sauropod, Cedarosaurus, was recovered in?
@Soldier 'that's literally explained by the fact..'
'Global flood' was falsified a long, long time ago. Please, let it go and move on.
There is no evidence anywhere on planet Earth demonstrating a global flood occurred a few thousand years ago, and much evidence demonstrating that it didn't. Please be honest, have some integrity, and accept the data and evidence from planet Earth which indicates there was no Global flood.
Dinosaur bones are often found on or just below the surface in several areas.
You got that completely wrong. Dinasour fossils are found above the KT. Often severe winds have partly uncovered Dino fossils.
Probably best to get your facts right before commenting.
The earth is about 4.5 billion years old.
Yep. It's such an astronomically absurd calculation, it has to be correct... even if radiometric dating
has only been around for just over 100 years. lol
@@funkster007 Yes, earth rocks have been dated an absurd number of times -- many thousands. The age has been correlated among tests and also compared and confirmed with meteorite testing. The facts are undeniably at odds with the kindergarten interpretation of the Bible that is so prevalent today in the media. Why we keep hearing that stuff is anybody's guess.
What could also be mentioned that Genesis mentions "day and night" for each of those days. As far as I'm aware, "day and night" only refers to a 24-hour period on Earth, and I'm not aware of anything suggesting that this cycle was substantially longer than 24 hours or at least what is normally considered a 'day' in modern times.
Bob... this is debated all the time. Check out debates between Hugh Ross and Ken Ham.
@@joshtischler6461 Well, either one believes the Bible or s/he doesn't.
It doesn't mean millions of years. Even in the Hebrew it's specific when it's says day meaning 24 hours. Scores of other statements in the Bible all use the same language and it's a 24 hour day. So yes there is no reason to think millions of years. It's just a way for gullible people to try to rationalize it and make themselves feel better. Yet it's kind of silly to think God created everything he did but couldn't do it in a short time frame.
@vikingskuld yeah why would God need all this time as if he isn't omnipotent. "Yom" in hebrew does mean time and can be interpreted in different ways but in this context the Bible makes it super clear to define what "Yom" is. Evening and Morning was a "Yom". So the translation to call it a day is accurate. Every single one of those 6 days of creation it repeatedly says that it was evening and morning. It was as if the Bible wanted to make it clear what exactly a day is. Its not a thousand years. Its not an indefinite eon of time. It is specific. It doesnt change its description when God creates the sun moon and stars. Its still evening and morning make a day. So how we view a day by using the sun to tell time lets us know that, that is what a day is. Then the commandments talks about this first week starting the weekly cycle which we see are 24 hour periods. Unfortunately, this is predicted. The wisdom of God is foolishness to man. Something so simple and repeated 6 times isn't believe, then how can one believe the rest of the Bible. It's sad.
@@waynejamel6703 hey I just wanted to say thank you foe the more detailed clarification of scripture. It's definitely appreciated
Nowhere in the bible does it say how old the universe is.
That’s because they were shepherds not astrophysicists
@@billypilgrim4816 All they had to do was write down what god said.
@@mobulis
that's nonsensical.
sorry, but not is the word Bible in the Bible nor the word Trinity in The Bible. however once i began reading it it's understandable. and this earth will soon be put to an end also. we are in the last days. time to get right with God of this universe and confess with your mouth your sin, Jesus died on the cross for your personal sin as he did for myself and the whole world, Amen.
How do you explain breeding then? People have been breeding plants and animal for thousands of year. Go to the supermarket. Everything in there comes from human selections. Natural fruits and vegetables and animal don't look anything like that. We don't need millions of year to see change. Just a few decades. Probably even less.
And that took intelligent to do right?
Young earth creationists exist so scientologists have someone to laugh at.
really? well that's a pretty shitty thing to say.
"Scoffers" as the Bible says.
do you mean "scientists"? not sure Scientologists care :)
@@SincerelyBradley scientologists will always be overjoyed to find groups more unhinged than they are.
@@IIrandhandleII 😂 touché
Just imagine believing that the Earth is only a few thousand years old and ignoring or cherrypicking what "science" to believe or not to believe. I should start selling bridges to these people.
Just imagine believing that the Earth is millions of years old and ignoring or cherrypicking what the Creator said about Himself and us to believe or not to believe.
"These people" aren't stupid, dont wait for the end of your self or Christ return to realize that.
@@ronniewagner5368 the ~6,000 year old earth has so many holes and contradicts the logic they try to use against scientists. I'll stick to my belief that we have yet to fully grasp the universe or our planet, but will continue to learn and stay open minded.
@@valdezfam If your a believer, your leaning "away" from scripture "toward" what man says.
I lean "toward" the Bible and think that disciples of Christ should as well....
Here are some examples;
I believe when Eve was made, she was capable of thinking, eating and reproducing..at one day old, although she may have looked 16 or 28 or 35, as soon as God made her.
No "science" is capable of replicating that, testing that or theorizing how it may be true.....
So if you are a believer, where do you start?
Science won't prove Jesus resurrected Lazarus from the dead,, they could interview him,, watch him eat,, check his blood and heart rate...wouldn't help,, it was a supernatural event.. do you believe that?
If so why that and not what the Bible says in face of what man assumes to be true? If God made Eve with age, why not the universe?
If not, do you believe Christ rose from the dead?
If so, why that and not Lazarus?
If not, then your not a Christian, you got much bigger problems than how old the earth is.
Where do you start to believe God?
Chapter 11 of Genesis?
The biggest problem with old earth is death before sin.
If we evolved death was here before Adam, eliminating the fall because of sin and eliminating the need for Christ and His work for our salvation.
The fall, the need for redemption, and God Himself can not be proven beyond looking at creation and realizing there was a Creator. God designed it that way so that salvation will be by what? By faith, the conviction of believing things unseen...
If your a Christian You should be thinking on things like, why the tree in the garden? Why the animal covering as opposed to plant?
Sovereignty of God and the responsibility of man...
Why will Satan be released after the mill kingdom once he's bound....
We are told as Christ followers to make disciples (learners), not how we can reconcile the Bible with the theories of fallen men, no matter how smart our culture deems them to be.
If your not a christian you have much worse difficulty to overcome, unless you can be everywhere in the universe at the same time from eternity past to eternity future, you can't prove God doesn't exist.
It's logical if you think it thru.
This whole BELIEF falls apart when you consider the following:
1. Radiometric dating is undoubtable proof that earth is older than 6000 years old.
2. We have in fact observed evolution happening on bacteria and some insects, also on birds and reptiles on a much smaller scales.
3. Let's suppose that evolution is not real.. then you guys would have to explain a lot of things, because that would mean serious implications to several unrelated fields of Biology that all fall on the same conclusions all using different pieces of evidence, observations and experimentation. The main problem is the fossil record and genetics, as both of them serve the strongest evidence to back up evolution, in the fossil record having several different fossil from different species or group of animals that among many things show a clear evolutive timeline and how different traits developed and genetics as genetic sequencing and comparison further proves the genetic relation and the absolute ancestry between all living organisms, and that the closer we are in the taxonomic tree the more genetic similitudes we will have (let's remember also, that the taxonomic tree, the system of animal classification purely runs on evolution and if evolution isn't real then we would also have a problem with that, because for the taxonomic tree to be created a lot of other evidences and proofs of several more fields of science, some not even relating Biology came together)
Yeah it's odd that they always say we haven't observed it. We have. Over just 50 years we have dropped birds on a island, and come back to find they have grown extra body parts in their stomachs that help them digest the plants there. Creationists are a wild breed
Are they still birds though? They didn’t turn into fish and swim away. Adaptation is built into our genome but has boundaries that don’t allow evolution. Adaptation is seen all the time and is built into our DNA design. Evolution has never been documented or prove. Not one transitional animal dead or alive has been found and you should expect to see millions of them if the the theory, or belief I should call it, were true. Creationism is firstly based on an eyewitness account that can be tested and verified
So, Adam died around the time Stonehenge was built…?!
You mean the silly theory that says you were goo, that went to the zoo, and then to you?
Yeah, what a silly idea. Much better that a timeless immaterial supreme being just thought us into physical existence.
@michaelwmauser1 Romans 1:18-23, is something you should read. Romans 10:11-13 as well. Where you spend eternity depends on your choice.
Yay Ken ive never heard anyone else say that the “millions of years” being deliberately incomprehensible!!! No one seems to understand me when I say it 😂
Probably because it's a really dumb statement 🤷♂️
*Deliberately* incomprehensible? So Ken Ham is a conspiracy theorist and thinks that the world's geologists and other scientists are all lying about the subject?
Scientists do not simply pull figures like millions or billions out of their butts, you know that, right? Science is not about going to a job and making stuff up..
Asking people how they come to understand an incompressible amount of time ...
Well, the Universe is of incomprehensible size with hundreds of billions of trillions of stars. Check out the evidence we can see with the Hubble and James Webb space telescopes and open your minds to enormity.
Mind blowing... Creation is surely a similar Eternity...
The only reason you cling onto the young Earth notion is because it fits with your magical thinking. You have drawn a conclusion about the universe. Namely, that it was created by some kind of omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent thing. And you have to jam in nonsense to support this conclusion, despite the fact that you have no evidence for it.
It's not magical. It's miraculous
Never seeing one species turn into another species, the magical thinking of evolution.
We have literally seen wolves turn into both chihuahuas AND Great Danes within recent memory. We have the pedigree records of these dogs to prove it. Selection can alter an animal’s form dramatically.
i'm curious why you are on this post in the first concern?
How many billions (not millions) of years ago was it that the earth's atmosphere had no free oxygen? The earth existed, and it had an atmosphere, but the atmosphere had no free oxygen. How long ago was that? It was before any air breathing animals, obviously.
So I guess all those galaxies the James Webb telescope discovered are only 6,000 light years away. This is just ridiculous logic.
A Geocentric universe solves all those problems but secular science will not have that. That would mean letting a devine foot in the door.
@@shipwright6122 there is no distinction between science and secular science. all science is secular science.
@@Skyfoogle
How about just science?
@@shipwright6122 i agree. science is a method for understanding the physical world through testing and verifying hypotheses. science is secular by nature.
@@shipwright6122 science is not a tool or a method that can possibly allow a 'divine foot' in the door.
Science is only capable of studying the natural. Science cannot possibly address anything 'supernatural'.
Many scientists are religious, or follow some sort of belief system, but they keep that separate from their work as scientists.. except for the scientists who write articles for sites such as AIG. Those scientists adhere to AIG's 'statement of faith'.. which means they aren't actually conducting proper science.
light was created after earth , how is that possible earth was created before sun ?
I always like to think of the scripture in Second Peter3:8 where it says that with the Lord a day is as a thousand years and a thousand years as a day. The six days time of Adam is almost over and Messiah is coming soon to redeem his people into the seventh day millennium of his kingdom!
So, you "put aside" the question whether those six days were ordinary days or millions of years, and came back to "if those were six ordinary days, the earth and universe are 6000 years old" - fade out. ???
If I didn’t see it rain last night, but I wake up in the morning and my street and grass are wet, I believe that’s circumstantial evidence it rained last night. Circumstantial evidence can prove a point just as convincingly as direct evidence can prove it. You need to explain that principle and deal with its consequences when arguing for a young earth. Thanks.
That's the most dumbest example ever....... you cannot compare one day to a billion years like come on now makes no sense
@@densincomprehend8879 It makes total sense. These guys are making the argument that because scientists were not there to observe something, their conclusions are suspect. My rain example makes the point that circumstantial evidence proves a point just as powerfully as watching it happen (direct evidence).
or somebody ran a water hose or spilled buckets of water on your yard. Do better. You also have SEEN rain. That's why you know what it does.
Dino-bones with soft tissue that can't be even be a half a million years old, is the rain you didn't see coming, huh?
due.fog.humidity. come on bro atleast try.
i beleive in god but this is alot of crap.way to let the side down
it's capital G God, and this is truth. the Word of God is living and sharper than any double edged sword. will you read it?
@@fabbrofamily7038 will i read what? and who made you the grammar police. and the reality is that the word of god is not living it is dying
there are literally man made structures older than 6000 years. BTW its amazing how entire civilizations (china, egypt, india, central africa, peru, etc) lived right through noahs flood without a scratch, huh?
Maybe they held their breath for 40 days and nights?
Tht is not true.
@@eddyvos2628 what isnt true?
@@davidm1187 Eddy *needs* the Earth to be only 6,000 years old.
How do you know those man made structures are actually as old as you've been taught?
How do you know they're using the right dating methods? There are many other dating methods which give younger dates that fit with Young Earth, mainstream academia just doesn't choose them
I would take my kids there, but I would make it plain to them before going that it's all just myth and make believe.
What would the evidence be?
Billions of dead laid down in a SINGLE sedimentary rock layer that covered the entire globe.
Something akin to the KT boundary which leaves a record in a single rock layer observable all over the earth with a clear geologic date.
heaven is the breatable atmosphere beyond earth? did angels shouted for joy upon creation? spiritual world not included?
How about not deleting my comment and the link to my YT video on the Biblical age of the universe. Instead, maybe watch it and tell me where it is incorrect, scientifically, or Biblically.
So the Bible can’t give exact dates but it can give exact dates?
Theories about the age of the earth are wrong because we weren't there to observe. However, anything put forth is the Bible is true because we weren't there to observe all the events described in the Bible (um, wait a minute?)
exactly
just what I thought
The Bible was inspired by the one who created the Universe. The book of Genesis hasn't changed to suit some discovery. Old Earth however changed a lot.
@@themiataboy909 and you "know" this because someone told you so, or because you are able to communicate with the creator of the universe and said creator confirmed this for you?
Sean
I suggest you come at this from the most recent point of view.
Thousands of manuscripts that affirm that Jesus lived, died and rose from the dead.
It's not difficult to believe the living and dying part, but it takes faith to believe the raised from the dead part.
The miracle of DNA is just one unexplainable phenomenon that miracles.
It's not hard to become a theist, but it's quite difficult to see your need for a Savior.
Good luck mate.
There is a difference between create and make.
Create means to form from nothing but make means to transform for service.
The first day was with a pre existing universe. The 4th day was the day the purpose and authorship of the celestial bodies was announced not the day they were placed because there was a 4th day.
If one says that God created rather than made everything in six days it creates a stumbling block to keep unbelievers from believing.
Sorry I don't believe the earth is only 6000 yrs old ,
Archeologists hv dug up below the earth surface both human and artifacts that say much different
There are many videos on this channel which refute those claims in a very rational, logical and scientifically correct manner.
@paxvobiscum9859 no, there are not.
@@vladtheemailer3223 though spiritual meditation I trust my spirit quid not man or science fiction 🙏
@artcook1976 trusting your meditation is trusting man.
@@vladtheemailer3223 u are a misguided Lost soul
He is wrong. Had he read and respected the bible, he would gave known that Adam was created in a second creation, so counting back to Adam doesn't give any information about the age of the earth.
"I can't comprehend it - So, it must be incomprehensible."
Arrogant hubris based on a total misunderstanding of how evolution works -
Just because Ken doesn't understand it - Does not make it false -
Most of what he says is simply wrong - He's creating Straw Men left and right -
"No one has ever seen one animal change into another animal"
Evolution DOES NOT say that it does - That's a false claim based on a lack of understanding -
Your comment is about a month old, and not a single person has responded to it until now..
These people conveniently skip over uncomfortable comments on RUclips just like they conveniently skip over uncomfortable facts about reality that we learn through science.. (well, I guess in this case, those two things are one and the same.. anyway, thanks for the facts 👍)
I just need a little clarification.....
If evolution DOES NOT say that one animal changes into another animal, then what does it say?
Thank you 😊🙏
@@lifeofbrilliance4494 it doesn't *say* anything. Anyway, where did you hear that evolution involved animals changing into different animals?
If you're interested, just start by learning some of the basics with a simple online search
Berkeley University has an excellent biology section on their site specifically set up to explain and answer the basic questions people have concerning biological evolution, so that would be a great place to start.
You'll want to learn about natural selection, and things like Gene duplication, genetic drift, gene flow, horizontal Gene transfer; there's a lot to learn just to understand the basics, really.
@@lifeofbrilliance4494 here is a very brief, basic definition:
'Biological evolution is the change in inherited traits over successive generations in populations of organisms. Adaptation is a key evolutionary process in which variation in the fitness of traits and species are adjusted by natural selection to become better suited for survival in specific ecological habitats'
-- sciencedirect
@@lifeofbrilliance4494 It says that over periods of time the whole population gradually evolves to respond to the environmental pressures they live with - If those changes are helpful for survival then those creatures will survive - If the changes are not helpful - The creatures will not live to reproduce - Survival of the fittest is not about who is the biggest and strongest - It is about being the most fit to survive and thrive under given circumstances - Some folks seem to think evolutions says that at some point a couple of monkeys gave birth to a modern human - That's not at all what evolution claims - Humans and other Modern Apes come from one of those groups - We share common ancestry - and We are still apes - Still evolving - The other apes in our tree are still evolving too - In parallel - Not directly from oner to the other - And over millions of years - Not in a single birth event - And again - It's not about individuals but the whole population of a given species -
Why would Richard Dawkins go berserk? What happened to the idea that the six days of creation might not have been just days? Would you not return to it? You haven't made me crazy, just bored. You are wrong, missing essential knowledge that is generally accepted and proven. What is your point? Proving that you don't understand logic and science?
Thank you dear Ken Ham, in Jesus name, Amen.
Thank him for lying?
@@JonS Thank him for sharing the right perspective of looking at the world and it's history. If there is anyone lying it's the mainstream science community, with there inaccurate dating methods and their absolutely absurd evolution theory.
Jon Stern Why would it benefit him to lie ? He already faces rejection from the scientific community? He doesn't get any benefit to lie.
@@johnlewis8934 whether it benefits him or not, he is a chronic liar when it comes to science related topics.
(It benefits him :-) young-earth creationist books, ark encounter, Creation 'Museum', etc..)
@@johnlewis8934Just plain deluded.
i thought lying was a sin? misleading is lying too.
truth!
i mean truth that the world is millions of years old. lying is a sin grind, and the secular gnostic science HAS been doing that for decades now. moreover the blood al disorder has also rebelled terribly against God. and satans doom is sure!
Ken Ham is a young earth zealot. The age of the earth has nothing to do with our salvation and his interpretation of the scriptures is not a sound doctrine you must believe in.
Truth gets most sinners panties in a wad. The Truth will set you free. Genesis 1 is historical narrative in context.
@@shipwright6122 You are right.
@@shipwright6122 arent we all sinners? you arent? dont be a hater be a debater
@@chrisyoung9653
Yes. Truth upset me at first but then I realized it was really what I needed to hear. The hardest thing I’ve ever done was change my mind. I needed God’s help. 🙏🏼✝️
@@shipwright6122 As I said before. Kent Ham’s interpretation is not something one must believe in order to be a Christian. The age of the Earth has absolutely nothing to do with Truth which leads to salvation or freedom. Truth is Jesus Christ Himself, and He is the one that sets us free. And as a Christian who has his own mind, I do not agree with Ken Ham. Genesis 1:2 is represented in 2 Peter 3:5. God did not create the earth in darkness and then said “let there be light”. Genesis 1:2 is not the beginning stages of an unfinished Creative process. The Heaven and the Earth was originally created in Genesis 1:1. Then in Genesis 1:2 the earth was “standing out of the water and in the water” as it was destroyed through judgement. The Earth BECAME without form and void. If you read 2 Peter in context, you will see that Peter was not referring to the flood In Noah’s day. There is a contrast between the “heavens were of old” and the “heavens and the earth WHICH ARE NOW”. The flood in Noah’s day had absolutely no affect on the heavens above. The fake model of a “water canopy” did not exist and had nothing to do with the flood in Noah’s day. The flood waters came from under the earth, and it was only after the fountains of the deep broke, then the windows of heaven opened. Meaning powerful geysers erupted into the earth’s atmosphere which caused it to rain for the first time.
Why is the water canopy false? The waters above the firmament did not only form the earth’s atmosphere but it also include outer space. For God placed the sun, moon and the stars within that same FIRMAMENT that was formed when God separated the waters. And as we all know, the sun, moon and stars are not residing within the earth’s atmosphere. Psalms 148:4 mentions the waters above the heavens. Those who falsely claim the earth was flooded by the waters above the firmament which they say created a water canopy, are dead wrong according to Psalms. Those waters are still above the heavens. When Peter says “the heavens and the earth “which are now” he was referring to Genesis 1:3-31. This is when the Lord began the restoration process. Which means the earth is both old and young at the same time. Therefore I reject Ken Ham’s interpretation.
Im curious as to what happened to dinosaurs? Were they made extinct in flood? Or before or after flood?
Gen 1:2
Watch "is Genesis history?" It will answer everything brilliantly with reputable scientists.
The flood greatly explains the extinction of the dinosaurs.
The flood caused their extinction I believe. Marine life found buried with hundreds of dinosaurs. Also most dinosaur graveyards in us is inland almost as if they were trying to escape the flood coming.
Most during, I believe others were hunted and killed after
Where is this video from? Or how can I watch the whole thing, and not just a portion such as this?
From an early age I’ve always thought the Bible was factually incorrect but metaphorically true in many ways. The problem is that if the Bible can lie about one thing it can lie about everything. I try to seek truth and not ideology.
Thank God there’s not one lie in the Bible. Scientists the majority being naturalistic often cannot prove their theories are true yet are willing to risk their whole life on something they can’t prove with an absolute certainty Many Scientists are basing their conclusions on Secular interpretations of present day observations YET call Christian’s crazy for believing in a creator that they say cannot be proven with an absolute certainty .. the contradiction in that .. when are they going to admit that they KNOW nothing more than they accuse us falsely of not knowing ? While they ignore the very undeniable evidence of both prophetic fulfillment and archeological findings as well as the actual historically recorded miracles of Jesus.
They’ll believe in an uncreated bang but not an uncreated God.. their hypocrisy is seen plainly and their eyes are blinded by it.
The Bible is not factually incorrect about anything.
Men are, though.
If you find your worldview conflicts with the worldview taught in the Bible, research the matter fully with an open mind (and remember not to blindly believe the current consensus of mainstream academia like a religious text) and you'll realize there are actually a lot of false views being taught to the public as science when they're actually just false Naturalistic philosophies posing as science
Your logic could therefore be applied to _anything_ you read/hear, so your argument destroys itself.
@@Embrachu Not true because science is based on evidence while what the Bible says is just claims with no evidence you need to believe at face value.
Hi. Nice one Ray, you're onto it, the Bible can indeed lie. It was adulterated by Rome. Literalists ignore that Jesus spoke in parables order to obscure truth, not to expose it. That's dishonest. (Matt 13:13), and (Mark 4:10-12). This is why his disciples often asked him to explain his parables.
Another lie, (a half-truth actually), is (Luke 16:10), where Jesus concludes that "people who are honest (faithful) in small things, are honest in big things". It's true sometimes, but Jesus completely ignores that con-men are deliberately honest in small things in order to gain your trust and rip you off in big things. Jesus' spouts a half-truth that help crooks and disadvantages honest people. His weasel words conclude a parable about a dishonest steward whom Jesus commends. Christians have a great deal of trouble explaining this parable, and so they should.
Truth can only be found by intellectual honest people, which you seem to be. We can be perfectly honest (in principle it's possible), and perfect honesty has a perfect relationship with truth, which is God. Honesty is the Holy Spirit of God. So keep seeking truth, and I'll leave you with one of Jesus' true sayings, "know the truth, and the truth shall make you free". (John 8:32) Cheers, P.R.
My mother in-law is 6,000 years old.
The earth is and that's it
How is she doing?…
@@donmac5918
Thank you for asking. She became a fundamentalist Christian so she could claim that she's only six days old.
@@tiffsaver “Fundamentalist” the word is not in the Bible…..6000 yrs not in the Bible….the number 6 in the Bible…extract.
Many people (primarily Jewish religious leaders), toward the end of Christ Jesus’ ministry ..believed he was guilty of political subversion / blasphemy a total of 6 people, however, are recorded as stating that he was innocent of all the charges leveled against him.
The 6 people who found Christ innocent were Roman Prefect of Judea Pontius Pilate (Luke 23:14), Herod (Luke 23:15), Judas (after the devil left him - Matthew 27:3), Pontius Pilate's wife (Matthew 27:19), one of the thieves on the cross next to Christ (Luke 23:41) and a Roman Centurion who was at the crucifixion (Luke 23:47)…..
We are about to go into the 7 thousandth year, the 1000 year reign! 2 Peter 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
Ken, if you want to bring people to God, you have to educate yourself about nature and God.
As a European I love to listen to Ken Ham. He’s a psychotic Loony. But I think he’s harmless…
i pray your eye gates and ear gates will be opened to the truth, in Jesus name, Amen.🙏🏼✨✝️🩸📖🗡
If someone really believes the earth is young, why do they use lies to support their position?
If someone really believes the earth is old, why do they use lies to support their position?
@@betsieswartz lack of direct observational evidence and assumptions that cannot be verified
@@betsieswartz Bible doesnt claim to be scientific. it is historical and can be verified historically from outside accounts.
science is based on direct observations. thus by definition, the theory you believe in is unscientific.
"Are you really going to say that every fossil beyond that has been dated past 6,000 years ago is untrue?"
looks like you dont know the difference between direct observational evidence and indirect evidence. please take a basic science course
@@betsieswartz we can directly observe transitional species in the fossil record, which is direct evidence"
no, this is direct observations of indirect evidence. like I said please take a basic science course.
@@betsieswartz The B clearly doesn’t state anything scientific, because creation and many other things can be directly disproven."
Why would it state anything scientific? it is a history.
"Also, paleontology and evolutionary biology are absolutely sciences..."
science is based on direct observations. paleontology and evolutionary biology are not based on direct observations. they are not science. they are historical science.
iam astonished at the ignorance and scoffers in these comments just as the Bible tells us would occur. don't listen then, or rather, i pray for your discernement all you who come here simply to attack and jeer with empty atgument 🙏🏼📖🗡🇮🇱⏰
I used to be a hardcore creationist. Studied the science as much as possible. I watched Ken Ham as a kid; met him at an event (in Cleveland, I believe). I also loved Kent Hovind, AKA “Dr. Dino.” And to this day, I cannot believe I actually fell for it. This is a cult, and it’s harmful to the progression of science.
There are so many flaws in creationism. Granted, their are flaws in the current model of evolution as well. The difference is, modern day evolutionists can at least say, “well, we don’t know the answer quite yet, but we will keep researching, and trust the scientific process.” Meanwhile, creationists just say, “well, we don’t know the answer, but we trust that God already knows the answer.” It’s harmful to science, and harmful to the kids that are taught creationism.
Tell me, where in the Bible does it mention the horrendous natural disasters that have happened throughout our history? Mass extinctions have come about through ice ages, massive volcanic events, climate change, and the most well known, the Chicxulub impact. Where in the Bible does it mention the 6 mile wide asteroid that smashed into the Yucatán peninsula? We know there is a crater there, almost 100 miles wide. That event was so powerful, air temperatures around the globe reached hundreds of degrees. It burned any living thing above ground. Fire and rock rained down around the entire globe. The only GLOBAL disaster mentioned in the Bible is Noah’s Ark, and there is no possible way it was connected to that asteroid impact. (However, Noah’s ark could possibly be explained by a smaller asteroid that struck the Indian Ocean, causing immense coastal flooding…but certainly not global flooding). The pieces just don’t add up. We know that there are countless events in history that would have been recorded in the Bible, because given the severity, the people would have assumed it was judgement from God. For example, stories of raining fire and brimstone exist, and everyone thought it was “Yahweh’s” doing. When in fact, it was most likely a smaller volcanic eruption. So, if they took the time to record that, why would they not record massive global disasters?
I should also add in the KT boundary caused by the asteroid impact…that separation of life below vs life above entirely debunks the notion that humans ever existed with dinosaurs, and we were in fact separated by quite some time. (However, it needs to be said that if any of you truly believe dinosaurs and humans EVER coexisted, I doubt you’ll be able to grasp any of the concepts I mention in this entire comment)
REAL science follows a process. We obtain all of the evidence, and come to a rational theory. Creationists assume they already KNOW the conclusion, and try desperately to find evidence for it. That’s not how science works, people.
Folks, don’t fall for this stuff. Honestly, I would beg you to leave religion in general. But since people have a tendency to gravitate toward wishful thinking, that’s unlikely. So I would AT LEAST ask you to leave creationism and young earth theory. Sure, maybe there IS a god. We won’t know until we’re dead. But that god CLEARLY uses natural processes to shape history. Faith may “move mountains,” but it doesn’t cure cancer. It doesn’t put people on the moon, or lessen global warming. SCIENCE does all of that. And that same science tells us that the earth is at least 4 billion years old, and has seen amazing things that happened long before the arrival of modern man.
Amen! 🙏🙌
I’m sorry you lost your faith, but your negativity won’t change my faith
God’s word > man’s word
I've seen lots of times where scientists throw out evidence because it conflicts with their beliefs. Ever seen the footprints of dinos and man in the same strata? There is a whole field of objects called "ooparts" (out of place artifacts) that don't make "scientific" sense. Like the many modern objects found in coal mines etc... For all we know, Noah's flood could have been the result of an asteroid impact. No - science can be just as much of a "cult" as anything else trying to explain where we came from and where we are going....
Ok. I agree with you because God says a thousand days is as a year and a year as is a thousand days. But there has to be a God. Look at how well every creature’s body is designed and how everything keeps a system and time. And the Bible says that God knows the future. So God knows the patterns of earth -what will happen in nature - and plan accordingly. And I’m sure the Creator can also set things in motion to make events happen as well. P.s. I’m only here because I got hate from some other Christian today saying I hate God for not being a young earther. Sigh. Most who claim to be Christians either aren’t or don’t realize how hateful they can be too.
Great video!
_"If the Bible gave a date of creation, that would be a problem. If the Bible give a date of creation, then it would have a mistake in it, and it would be fallible"_
And then you go on to derive a date of creation from the Bible.
So you are saying that the Bible has a mistake in it, and it is fallible?
Some characters are omitted in the old testament genealogies because only people of note are mentioned, not every single descendant. But yes, even if all of them were mentioned it would probably not add up to millions of years.
Don't Christians also look at God's work, you know, nature, instead of just reading words in the book? Didn't God create nature? Can we not also learn about God's work by studying nature, as well as reading the Bible?
@@travisbicklepopsicle yes, we should. God reveal Himself in different ways. His Word and Creation probably being the two most accessible of them.
That’s so not true!
@@travisbicklepopsicle The Bible also speaks of God putting His word above even His name. So while yes a person can look at nature and learn from it His holy word has precedence over nature. Let God be true and every man a liar.
The general consensus among evolutionists is that the earth is about 4.6 billion years old, but I say the earth is vigintillions of years old.
Evolutionists? You mean *scientists*
i hAvE bEcOmE eMoTiOnAlLy UnStAbLe!!
This dude never showed any proof
cope
What kind are you looking for. I can provide
@@YoungEarthCreation that the earth is 6000 years old. Prove it without the Bible
@@charlesfuller2998 Just curious why you care? I mean, you are here making comments in the chat, so this topic appears to be something of importance to you.
@@tzgardner I refuse to live in a world where people actually go against science and believe the earth is 6000 years old. This is ridiculous. It’s 2022. And people actually believe this stuff after watching a RUclips video.
I'm trying to build my own museum here in florida, you guys inspire me so much.
How is your museum coming along? Where are you located? I live in Tarpon Springs, Florida and would love to come visit. 🙏🏼✝️ God bless.
Yes how is it going?
You mean Ken Ham’s lies inspire you to set up your own monument to lying?
You're planning to build a natural history museum, no entrance fee, right?
(..hopefully.. fingers crossed..)
Hi. Yep, once it's up and running you"ll have a nice little business. Tee shirts to sell, cafe, accommodation, even the flat earthers make a pile out of their nicely packaged twaddle. Way to go, Mecca, Jerusalem, it's always been about milking pilgrims. Cheer$, P.R.
Does anybody ever sit and ask themselves…why is it the year 2023?
the one creating the calenders were christians
My theory is that the evil rulers have ruled for 2,023 years, resetting time as a new age (year 1)
It's 6010 according to the Bibles calander
Because last year was 2022?:-)
Please, the Bible mentions the Flood, but there is no mention of Chicxulub impact crater for the earlier and far larger Deniliquin impact crater. No mention of the formation of the Moon by impact with Earth. Please when do these appear in young Earth models?
Great questions which need to be asked more
He needs to get 6000years of education
Right!
Same on you
So because your bible doesn’t include the age of the earth, that somehow demonstrates that the bible is factually correct? That makes no sense.
The Bible amazingly has a genealogy from Adam all the way to Jesus with ages of people.
@@waynejamel6703 No, the bible makes claims about characters we can’t even verify were true to begin with.
@@2l84me8 yes it takes faith to believe that the names and ages that are mentioned are true. Same as it takes faith to believe our history textbooks I school.
@@waynejamel6703 Wrong for multiple reasons. Faith is not a virtue nor a reliable pathway to truth. Literally anything can be taken on faith.
Historical documents must be credible and consistent, which is what we can observe and verify.
Mundane history and outrageous claims regarding religions and magic are not 2 halves of the same coin.
@@2l84me8 and look at how all the many books collected in the Bible are aligned and consistent with each other. I'm not trying to convince you. I am making point for believers in the Bible. I'm not sure if you believe in the Bible. But those who believe in the Bible should simply believe that when the Bible says that a day was an evening and morning to take that literally. Why pick and choose what we believe in the Bible
Infinie heat of the singularity cant create the mind in14 billion years i dont have enough faith to be an atheist
Welllll, tholins on Sedna, Makemake and Pluto dwarf planets take long to form in a lab in small amounts, if ya scale it up and include radiation speed of heat and approaimate time of formation, ya get a reaaaaaly old pluto and sedna and makemake, genesis says earth is older than those, therefore, earth is old.
Please what IS evolution?
Science
Im 10 billion years old
I believe there are no gaps in the genealogy of Luke 3.
I kinda agree. See time is determined by how things degrade. Degrading only happens if sin has already corrupted creation. So since Adam's sin it has been roughly 6,ooo yrs. We don't know how long Adam was in the garden & remember Adam was created sowhere else & moved to the Garden. So we don't know exactly how old the Earth is. My opinion Adam was around a couple hundred yrs before Eve ever arrived. And then, he had to teach her everything he did & the names of all the animals, plants, fish, fruits, nuts, ect. My hope in our original parents (giving them a lot of credit) the earth before sin till now id about 10,000 yrs.
I’ll stick to the 6k yr old earth. Makes more sense with the 6 to 1 ratio. 6 day work with 1 day rest. 6 year till the land with 1 year land rest. 6k year of human history and 1k as the Millennial kingdom of Christ on earth.
I have heard theory and I stress it is only theory nothing really to back it up so take it with a grain of salt - That Adam was probably in the Garden of Eden for 33.5 years as being a picture of Jesus living a sinless perfect life and then taking the sin of the world upon Himself. Adam willfully took of the fruit for Eve's sake being a picture of Jesus taking on the sin of the earth. Eve may have been created the last .5 years thus being naive and not having the experiences that Adam had and thus was easier to be deceived. Again I stress this is only a theory I have heard - take it or leave it.
Saying it takes millions or billions of years is a cop out for scientist. Thats a really big theory. They throw big numbers because they think people wont question it. You got a degree so i have to believe you.
Evolution doesn't really qualify as a theory!
It's more of a concept!
@@jacob.tudragens exactly but yet people talk about this concept as fact
@waynejamel6703
I know!
People are 'willfully ignorant', which translates to 'stupid'!
@@waynejamel6703it is a fact
But the Earth is Flat, we live in a snow globe-type earth, an enormous pond with a dome over us like the bible says, so it's not a Planet, but a plane!
I believe in creation, but there are two big flaws in this hypothesis. Firstly, if you take the account in the bible as being literal, God told Adam that in the day he ate of the fruit he should surely die. Adam lived to be nearly a thousand years old….. seems to point to the idea that a “day” to God is about a thousand earth years. So if God created the earth in six of His days it would be six thousand of our years. Then there is the fact that we dont know how long Adam and Eve were living in the Garden before they fell from grace…….. They could have been in there for many days……
Secondly, it seems that assuming God created the universe at the same time as the earth make the whole creation process very earth centric, like the old idea of the earth being at the centre of everything. It makes the earth the only planet with any of God’s creations on it in a vast empty universe. Why would God go to all that trouble to make empty galaxies billions of lightyears away and never use them.
The fact is the universe is billions of years old because it is full of earths just like us. God’s creations are without end and the idea that this earth is the only one is limiting God’s creation. This earth is not the first and it wont be the last of God’s creations, but the earth is quite young….. perhaps 12 thousand years, or slightly more.
The earth was not created in the place where it is now, and when it says God placed the stars in the heavens, it is describing the time the earth was moved to its current location orbiting our star, and it will be moved again when Christ returns.
LOL I’m an “evolutionist” now not a Darwinist😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
What is the point of that comment? I'm just trying to figure out what you mean
This video is clickbait. I didn't go crazy whatsoever.
Between
Billions of billions of billions of years ago.........................................................................................................................................................to 2022 (this year I'm typing this) we would have seen an example of species evolving to New species by now!!
We do
@@betsieswartz examples include??
@@indistructi-bill9770 Non avian dinosaurs to avian dinosaurs, the finches Darwin based his whole theory on, therapsids into modern mammals, Guanlong to T-Rex, to name a few.
@@betsieswartz I meant animals today.
@@indistructi-bill9770 finches, avian dinosaurs, and mammals are all around today. We can’t observe the others because evolution takes too long.
(Disclaimer, this is not a hate comment, more of an explanation) So evolution HAS been proven to exist, looking at the embryo of different animals (Including human) They look very much alike, this is not a coincidence if it's based off of evolution. Everything that happens is a slow process that includes evolution. Bones have been found proven to be millions of years, and they have been proven to be descendants from animals we have today. We also have several organs that don't serve any purpose, but did when we're still in our hunting stages till about 12,000 years ago. The example I'm trying to give is our third eyelid, we don' t use it ANYMORE, but we did when we were hunting 50,000 years ago. The appendix is also a great example with people living healthy lives without it. Also, not to mention, being all decedents from 2 people would mean that we are all a result of inbreeding, which is a sin (according to the bible). Everything takes, time it doesn't just happen like that. Not to mention that Christians also use time as their hero. Noah took about 120 years to build the ark, that's more than about any human has lived before. So to make up for that they made Noah crazily old, I'm talking almost a millennia old. It couldn't' t have been shorter because the technology wasn't there to build it faster considering it's over 140 meters long 24 meters wide and 14 meters tall, it's crazy stuff.
Once again, this is not hate, I'm just pointing out what I find the most reasonable answer. The earth being 6000 years old I find unbelievable. Since there is so much evidence older than 6000 years old.
not a hate come
t either, but these are lies from
the enemy satan.
@@fabbrofamily7038 If these are your only counter argument, then please do not try. It's lazy and not even written right
Just say infinite heat cant create the human mind
God made the earth and heavens in 6 days. So that means he also made all the stars and galaxies in 6 days. Say the Earth is roughly 6k years old according to the Bible. How did the light from a star millions of light years away be seen in our night sky , if the earth is only 6k years old?
I've heard three theories on this. I sought it out because I had the same question. One is that light doesn't travel the same speed both directions. Dr. Jason Lyle is a proponent of this. It sounds odd, but veritasium actually did a video about this concept, and he wasn't addressing the age of the universe at all, since he is a nihilist.
Another theory is the spreading of the universe like a canvas would have caused a riple that would fall outside time so there was a timeless window on the day God created the stars and light travelled in that time that wasn't measured by time.
The most viable theory I've heard (and accept) is that light has been slowing down and used to travel much faster. There has been so much evidence of this until recently when they started measuring light with an atomic clock, which is subject to the same slowing as light. If you are interested in this, look up Barry Setterfield GSR on RUclips. He has a video about light and the formation of the universe. He has been able to run the math and timeline where all the major events like meter craters, flood of Noah, fossils etc all fit a cohesive timeline
Also, why are stars still forming now, if they were *all* already created?
@@travisbicklepopsicle to my knowledge stars are not forming now. At least we have never seen a star form, and it's all theoretical
@@cameronnebe stars are still forming, galaxies are still forming.. the universe is very dynamic and in a constant state of change. The Milky Way produces an average of about 7 stars per year. Remember they go through life cycles; they live and die. Once iron production begins in the core.. boom! Supernova:-)
Of course not all stars explode; depends on the class of star, mass, all that stuff.
@@travisbicklepopsicle Where is the proof stars are forming now. And that is even impossible.
We have only been around for 6000 years or so.
Modern humans have existed for approximately 100,000 years
Say it ain’t so
Hey sir thanks for your opinion but um, uh you shouldn't be lying and please dont sin (9th commandment) at least you said you believe that which is just a personal truth. Look up molecular clocks and how that correlates with the fossil record. Im sure you will deny it though but even Darwin had faith in God.
The key here, though, is that those 6 days are likely not “regular” 24 hour days because those are based on the Earth rotating around the Sun. Before the creation, the Sun and Earth were not there yet in order to have 24 hour days.
But they _were_ "regular" 24-hour days, because there was the distinction made of each day beginning in the morning and ending in the evening, with each day being numbered 1-7.
I would like to share with you the gospel of our salvation in the dispensation of God's grace. “Grace can be defined as the undeserved favor of God for people who deserve His condemnation.”
God does not hold sins against us because they have already been paid for (every sin for every person.) Christ was made to be everyone's-every-sin (2 Corinthians 5:21). However, full reconciliation is not achieved until an individual "reconciles himself" to God (2 Corinthians 5:20). This happens upon belief of the gospel of our salvation. All humanity is forgiven but not all believe it. Being forgiven does not equal being saved, salvation comes by faith. Salvation is appropriated by faith, forgiveness of sins is NOT. Your sins were forgiven regardless of your belief. God did not need your faith at Calvary, He only needed His Son.
SALVATION is only gained by trusting Christ - via belief in the word of truth (the gospel of our salvation.) Salvation IS by works, just not our own. It is not of ourselves, but through the gift of God's grace that we are saved. Upon HEARING the gospel, if we BELIEVE the gospel, we are sealed with the holy Spirit of promise unto the day of redemption (Ephesians 1:13-14). A lost soul can only be saved by trusting Christ to have done everything necessary for our salvation though His finished cross-work. Romans thru Philemon are the only books in the bible that explain salvation for today. In those books we find salvation is by faith alone, in Christ alone, without-any-works-of-any-kind-at-anytime. Christ died for your sins, and has risen for your justification (1 Corinthians 15:1-4) Put your faith in what He did rather than what you have done, are doing, or are going to do. Salvation is not getting-your-sins-forgiven, it's believing they already are. (2 Corinthians 5:19)
Truth Time Radio, also on youtube and facebook, is here to help you better understand your bible and better articulate your faith to others.
belief was formed when something could not be explained and still people prefer magic to common sense explenations.
exactly. Can you imagine what people thought when they witnessed the first solar eclipse?
@@damianwhite504there was no first Solar eclipse. Eclipses were happening long before there were eyeballs to witness them.
I got my hopes up when I saw the cover image for this video saying "Earth is __________________" (since I thought this channel was going to stop suspiciously ignoring Flat Earth) but then I saw the word "old" and the CGI globe beneath it and remembered this is controlled opposition
The earth is round
The Earth is round. It is very ignorant at this point to say it’s flat. The evidence for this is endless, but for any simpleton, all you have to do is look at the clouds. They form a dome shape around the Earth and look like they are lower and in front of you when looking at the horizon (when doing this on the ocean, it looks like the clouds are “touching” the water in the horizon) If the Earth was flat you would see a straight line of clouds above as far as the eye could see, followed by black space, which would indicate where the Earth’s “edge” would be.
@AnnaSanclement Let's take a look at what prominent scientists have to say about whether your observation works to verify the Heliocentric model over competing options, shall we?
*There is no planetary observation by which we on Earth can prove that the Earth is moving in an orbit around the sun* Physicist, I. Bernard Cohen
*Whether the Earth rotates once a day from west to east...or the heavens revolve once a day from east to west...the observable phenomena will be exactly the same. This shows a defect in Newtonian dynamics since an empirical science ought not to contain a metaphysical assumption, which can never be proved or disproved by observation*
- Physicist, Dennis Sciama
*People need to be aware that there is a range of models that could explain the observations. For instance, I can construct you a universe with Earth at its center, and you cannot disprove it based on observations. You can only exclude it on philosophical grounds. What I want to bring into the open is the fact that we are using philosophical criteria in choosing our models. A lot of cosmology tries to hide that.* Physicist, George F.R. Ellis
*So, which is real, the Ptolemaic or Copernican system? Although it is not uncommon for people to say that Copernicus proved Ptolemy wrong, that is not true...one can use either picture as a model of the universe, for our observations of the heavens can be explained by assuming either the earth or the sun to be at rest* Physicist, Stephen Hawking
*The struggle, so violent in the early days of science, between the views of Ptolemy and Copernicus would then be quite meaningless. Either CS (Coordinate System) could be used with equal justification. The two sentences, the sun is at rest and the earth moves, or the sun moves and the earth is at rest, would simply mean two different conventions concerning two different CS*
- Physicist, Albert Einstein
*Let it be understood at the outset that it makes no difference, from the point of view of describing planetary motion, whether we take the Earth or the Sun as the center of the solar system. Since the issue is one of relative motion only, there are infinitely many exactly equivalent descriptions referred to different centers - in principle any point will do, the Moon, Jupiter...So the passions loosed on the world by the publication of Copernicus' book, De revolutionibus orbium caelestium libri VI, were logically irrelevant*
- Astronomer, Fred Hoyle
*we can take either the Earth or the Sun, or any other point for that matter, as the center of the solar system. This is certainly so for the purely kinematical problem of describing the planetary motions. It is also possible to take any point as the center even in dynamics, although recognition of this freedom of choice had to await the present century*
- Astronomer, Fred Hoyle
*It is possible to describe the entire universe using any chosen point as the unmoving center - the Earth will do very well - and no one can prove that choice is wrong....Scientists today prefer to picture everything in motion and nothing as being the center. If you haven't given much thought to the implications of twentieth-century science, you may be chagrined...to realize that because of the concept of relative motion, no one can prove that the Earth moves*
- Kitty Ferguson
*Thus we may return to Ptolemy's point of view of a 'motionless Earth' This would mean that we use a system of reference rigidly fixed to the Earth in which all stars are performing a rotational motion with the same angular velocity around the Earth's axis...one has to show that the transformed metric can be regarded as produced according to Einstein's field equations, by distant rotating masses. This has been done by Thirring. He calculated a field due to a rotating, hollow, thick-walled sphere and proved that inside the cavity it behaved as though there were centrifugal and other inertial forces usually attributed to absolute space. Thus, from Einstein's point of view, Ptolemy and Copernicus are equally right. What point of view is chosen is a matter of expediency*
- Physicist, Max Born
"The ancient argument over whether the Earth rotates or the heavens revolve around it (as Aristotle taught) is seen to be no more than an argument over the simplest choice of a frame of reference. Obviously, the most convenient choice is the universe....Nothing except inconvenience prevents us from choosing the Earth as a fixed frame of reference....If we choose to make the Earth our fixed frame of reference, we do not even do violence to everyday speech. We say that the sun rises in the morning, sets in the evening; the Big Dipper revolves around the North Star. Which point of view is "correct"? Do the heavens revolve or does the Earth rotate. The question is meaningless."- Physicist, Martin Gardner
*the Earth-centered system...is in reality absolutely identical with the system of Copernicus and all computation of the places of the planets are the same for the two systems*
- Astronomer, J. L. E. Dryer
"...it is very important to acknowledge that the Copernican theory offers a very exact calculation of the apparent movements of the planets...even though it must be conceded that, from the modern standpoint practically identical results could be obtained by means of a somewhat revised Ptolemaic system....It makes no sense, accordingly, to speak of a difference in truth between Copernicus and Ptolemy: both conceptions are equally permissible descriptions. What has been considered as the greatest discovery of occidental wisdom, as opposed to that of antiquity, is questioned as to its truth value."- Physicist, Hans Reichenbach
“Such a condition would imply that we occupy a unique position in the universe, analogous, in a sense, to the ancient conception of a central Earth…This hypothesis cannot be disproved, but it is unwelcome and would only be accepted as a last resort in order to save the phenomena. Therefore we disregard this possibility…. the unwelcome position of a favored location must be avoided at all costs…. such a favored position is intolerable…”
Edwin Hubble
"In order for the Earth to be at rest in the center of the system of the sun, planets, and comets, there is required both universal gravity and another force in addition that acts on all bodies equally according to the quantity of matter in each of them and is equal and opposite to the accelerative gravity with which the Earth tends to the sun...And thus celestial bodies can move around the Earth at rest, as in the Tychonic system."- Physicist, Isaac Newton
*I have come to believe that the motion of the Earth cannot be detected by any optical experiment*
- Physicist, Albert Einstein
@AnnaSanclement I could list many more examples, that's just a handful.
@AnnaS1371 Did my post above show? I'm just curious if it's visible. I listed numerous prominent scientists explaining why we can't verify the Heliocentric model through observation
YT has a pattern of randomly not showing important posts from FEers.
i am a christian, but I dont believe your stuff, God can create however he wants
Read you Bible please and get commentary assistance.
thanks
Yep, nuts
Saving repentance is realizing that you are a sinner deserving of God's just punishment in Hell and turn (repent) from whatever you trusted in before, if indeed you trusted in anything; to trusting in the person and finished work of Christ alone for salvation.
Sumerian civilization first took form in southern Mesopotamia around 4000 BCE-or 6000 years ago-which would make it the first urban civilization in the region.
6000 years ago doesn't mark the creation of Earth, but the destruction and fall of mankind.
For Adam was eternal before the fall and lived only 930 years as a mortal.
On the cosmic scale acquiring the knowledge of 'good and evil' came forth only murder, civil inequalities, and weapons of mass destruction.
THE END
@@israelcarrasco6777 no human being ever lived to be 900 + years old. Come on, man. Think.
People live longer lives now than they did in the past. We know from genetics, anthropology, and other fields that humans never lived to be multiple hundreds of years old.
Data and evidence don't lie. Your interpretation of ancient texts is simply wrong, at least regarding humans living to be hundreds of years old.
God created everything in His mind in eternity past.
He put it all in real matter, real time in the first six days of ' time '.
He set it all in motion in the first six days.
Perhaps. But there are hundreds of some species. Why would it be such a sin to believe one day is as a thousand years like the Bible says? Not saying you said it’s a sin, but some people do say that and say people hate God because they disagree with your opinion. But at least you believe God thought it all out. All the young earth ears I have heard or read comments of all thing God thought up and created everything in seven days without thinking it all out before.
@@reflectionsinthebible3579 the ' day as a thousand years ' refers to God being outside of time. A day having as much stuff in it as a thousand years. Knowing all the details of millions and even billions of people all at the same time would relate to a thousand years worth of things , of happenings, of living occurring in the space of one day.
At the same time, the ' thousand years as one day ' refers to God being eternal and in the endless eternity of God the real
' time ' span of creation and the physical universe is but a drop in the bucket.
It is like yesterday when it is past.
The way we might look at one day out of last month is the way God can look at a thousand years.
@@michaelszczys8316Evidence for this claim?
@@betsieswartz the Bible.
It doesn't say any of it in detail, it just says things were created within a six day time span. You can do with it like you want.
Myself I like to take into account how the Creator God is eternal and outside of time. He lives in a timeless, matterless realm. Time and matter are His creation.
Even empty vacuum of space is a creation of His. Even empty space light- years away from us is a place where the elements can exist and light and gravity
Before He created anything material there was not even a single hydrogen atom nor even the place to put it or even the SCIENCE for it to exist.
You might ask where does it say this in the Bible, well it doesn't spell it out in detail but it does say that ' without Him there was nothing made that was made ' or similar.
I suppose the Creator could have both thought everything up and created it in real matter as well in an instant, but I like to think that in the timeless realm of eternity past He gave it all a considerable amount of thought.
Also the thoughts of trying to create beings that will fellowship and love Him with free wills to do so will require a lot of painfull possibilities.
Being ' all- knowing ' the Creator had to know how everything and everyone would turn out in advance, even knowing how the SON would have to sacrifice for everyone before a single thing was ever created.
It's hard to fathom the mind of God.
00:50
1:30
2:10
3:35
Excellent video and makes more sense than evolution.
You’ve never studied it.
well said.
I'm a believer in Christ Jesus, No I do not believe in evolution (evil-ution); but I believe that the Earth is much older than 6-7 thousand years old, not because of science.
Genesis 1:1 says (in the beginning), it does not state when the beginning was. And from my understanding the original text does not read (in the beginning). Secondly where is the darkness and the flood upon the Earth in Genesis 1:2? Could this be the kingdom of darkness casting it's fallen shadow on the earth, (the beginning of the deep state). Why was the Earth in a flooded state?
2 Peter 3:5-6, this is not the flood in Noah's day of Genesis 7-9; also referenced by Peter in 1 Peter 3:20.
The scientist say that the universe is 13.7 billions years old don't know if it is or not and they probably don't know either. Either way we are here in TIME for a short time trust in the Lord Jesus He is our Only hope.
Additionally I believe that the Earth's fossil record speaks to generations of the earth.
Science hasn’t even made a dent into God’s ways.
@@shipwright6122 And science can and will only do what God has allowed. Somehow they think A I. can save humanity,
I was waiting for the words "flat Earth" to make an appearance. I was disappointed. No comedy here, move on.
please do.
@@fabbrofamily7038 who asked you? If I want your opinion, I’ll get it from you your mom tonight
5998 almost 6,000
5783 since Adam to be exact.
To be fair though, there is the issue of not knowing whether the 6-day creation period is actually 24 hours each. especially if you pick other passages of the scriptures, 'a day' can be 'thousand years'. So you could even go and claim that the 6-day period actually were 6000 years, which would make the Earth 12.000 years old. But it's also 'interesting' that the entire creation process in Genesis is called 'the day god created etc etc'. Not day-S in plural, but DAY.
The thing here is that regardless whether evolution would be a false and incorrect teaching in atleast the case of the age of the Earth, let's be honest and also admit that there neither is undeniable proof the Earth is created in just 6 days.
All I know is, the theory of evolution was a convenient way to justify transhumanism as 'the next stage of progress'.
? it's not relevant.
The oldest copy of the Tanakh (Old Testament) known today is the greek translation, called Septuaginta. The Book of Genesis was written down around 350 B.C. This means that Septuaginta's Genesis predates the Masoretic Bible, which is read by most people today, by about 1350 years. The Septuaginta adds an additional 650 years to the age of the patriarchs from Shem to Serug when they have their first son. This means that the earth or the universe is about 6650 years old. In Jesus' day EVERYONE (including Flavius Josephus, all New Testament writers, etc.) followed the Septuagint or the origin Hebrew scriptures (which were unfortunately lost) at the time by which it was translated. Even the writings of Qumran have more in common with the Septuagint than with our contemporary Masoretic Bible.
How can a christian believe in miracles but yet cant wrap their mind the miracle of creation in 6 days
Evolution is a religion not science
This is false