Sunscreen is BAD!? | New Research Explained
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 май 2019
- Is sunscreen and sunblock good or bad for you? In recent months, we've seen new data and articles suggesting that perhaps blocking the sun's UV rays from reaching your skin may not do much good for you. Here's the research explained.
00:49 Sunscreen is Bad!?
04:22 The Details Count
04:39 A Brief Science of Sunscreen
05:54 Should I Care About Skin Cancer?
07:03 The Verdict on Sunscreen
LINKS:
Australian Gold Sunscreen: geni.us/sunscreenspf50
How to Read Research Articles Quickly and Easily: • How to Make Research E...
SOURCES:
Original article: www.outsideonline.com/2380751...
Lindqvist 2016: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2...
Jovanovic 2017: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2...
Petersen 2014: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2...
Heerfordt 2018: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2...
Marks 1995: jamanetwork.com/journals/jama...
Dermatologist's perspective: www.teawithmd.com/2019/01/no-...
===============
Connect with me!
WEBSITE: medschoolinsiders.com
TWITTER: / medinsiders
FACEBOOK: / medschoolinsiders
INSTAGRAM: / medschoolinsiders
AMAZON STORE: www.amazon.com/shop/medschool...
===============
May include affiliate links to Amazon. As an Amazon Associate, I may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through them (at no extra cost to you).
Disclaimer: Content of this video is my opinion and does not constitute medical advice. The content and associated links provide general information for general educational purposes only. Use of this information is strictly at your own risk. Kevin Jubbal, M.D. and Med School Insiders LLC will not assume any liability for direct or indirect losses or damages that may result from the use of information contained in this video including but not limited to economic loss, injury, illness or death.
What is the next controversial topic you want me to do a Research Explained video on!? Let me know =)
A video on vaccine
Acne please!!!(Face and Body)
Is zinc oxide and titanium oxide commonly use in sun screen, carcinogen?
@@lancelance1513 as well as avobenzone and other chemical sunscreen ingredients safety
Not to go against a man who's far more educated than me, but the sunscreen he uses scores one of the worst ratings on ewg website..... Both the safety of the ingredients, and the actual protection that youre getting is poor. EWG are one of the only unbiased genuiine sources of information out there, so I assume they're accurate on this.
Here is the base issue I take. If sun exposure is this dangerous, how did we evolve the way we did and why didn't we evolve better? My hang up still comes to this goes against every facet of the theory of evolution. Why do I need something that hadn't been around very long to survive?
Likely because of colonialism. There is a theory that postulates that people started getting lighter skin when they migrated from Africa to Europe thousands of years ago. This was favorable because it made vitamin D easier to absorb. However because of colonialism many Caucasian people now live in environments where the sun is much more intense than their ancestors were used to. Think about how dark the aboriginals are in Australia vs European descended Australians.
Do you brush your teeth?
Stop wearing clothes in the winter, stop cutting your nails, stop using soaps, no vaccines, no antibiotics... you know, the list goes on...
(I am not saying this because I am pro or against wearing sunscreen, but because the evolution argument is often misused as in this case)
Because we live way longer than we used to so diseases that build up over the course of your life are way more important now than when we evolved
I always say if sun was bad then we would sleep during sunlight
I have multiple sclerosis, which is related to vitamin D deficiency. For many years I used sunscreen everyday, and I now think that it had a lot to do with the development of my disease.
My dad has that I didn't know it was related to a vitamin d deficiency, I thought it was only about your nervous system or something
Valentina RP: even tough you used a lot of sunscreen for many years, you probably didn't cover your whole body with it. UV rays still get through normal clothes
@@dabtican4953 Yes, it is recognized as a risk factor and the blood tests showed vitamin D was low
@@NicoXBT Yes, that's true, but I was also very careful with the sun in other ways. It was a combination of factors. I know have to be exposed to the sun without sunscreen for a few minutes everyday.
@@dabtican4953 Since Canada has a high rate of MS, we believe a lack of vitamin D plays a role. We do NOT know 100%.
I lived in riyadh, Saudi Arabia for about 14 years and I haven't heard of anyone having issues with the sun, that being said UV is still quite high here and even weather apps mention it..
Honestly I think it has to do with the food you eat and America has horrific food for their country. That’s why they mention in America 1/5 will get skin cancer
@@raehd you've been bamboozled. Sunscreen is the cause of skin cancer not the sun.
@@Sentinel_Daniel then why do pale white people get skin cancer when they don’t wear it?
As a Moroccan I can relate .
I apologise if I’m ignorant but Saudi Arabian women are beautiful. Because they don’t expose their bodies sexily and cover up as much skin as possible, including the face. I live in a touristy place and that’s how I observe…
My grandfather is in the sun daily and he is very healthy and he’s 91. He never use sunscreen and He smoked but stopped 10 years ago . He uses allot of self made olive oil and no mayonese and ketchup . He still dives in the sea and can still walk and run. How ? Vitamine d with the combination of staying busy (not on a stressfull level) keeps your brain healthy too. I wish u all much health
i agree so much,
It depends on his skin color and where he lives, if he has dark skin then it makes sense, but I can’t imagine he is fair skin and lives nearer the equator.
bless you and your grand father
Does he have skin moles?
My grandpa was the same from 5am till 8pm he was out in the sun on the farm only ate his own food at 93 he was still riding his motorcycle to go tothe farm he only passed early after my grandmother passes he had a broken hart and went fast after that but he was a machine
No other creature uses or needs sunscreen so it's weird that we're told to stay covered and wear sunscreen. I think the burning has more to do with the heat created so damage may depend on the temperature of the skin not the rays itself.
They dont use sunscreen but they do certain things which protect them from the sun. particularly overheating wise. We do the same thing though with houses and well 90% of people dont spend much time in the sun so I get what you’re saying
Nah sunburning is almost entirely caused by ultraviolet light. The heat of sun is caused by infrared light and not only is infrared pretty harmless except for maybe overheating/heat stroke, it’s very good for you and could probably facilitate the healing of a sunburn
i thought this was going to be smth like "this component used in most sun cream was found to be carcinogenic". not "not being exposed to sun hinders vitamin D function". really. for real. did they truly have to publish an article about that.
You only need a limited amount of sun exposure to get your vitamin D. After that your body should stop producing it. When your body stops producing vitamin d I would think would depend on genetic mutations but the assumption is that the body stops producing vitamin d when it doesn't need anymore. Its good research but it's not relevant to the public at all. I was interested to know if components in sun cream at their dosages were carcinogenic which would have been relevant for consumers so they can pick better brands, or the bad sunscreens can be regulated. Note Studying carcinogenicity may be difficult because the sun itself is carcinogenic
@@chadliampearcy i completely agree (although components could be tested in other ways, statistics are often fishy). although i dont know why i complained abt the vitamin D thing, considering i have an insufficiency lol. i should probably go out more in the sun
@@asserm.8047 I'm interested in what ways the components could theoretically be tested to inform whether to use such an otherwise effective component in our sunscreens.
@@chadliampearcy animal testing, for example. If u administer lab rats with a chemical compound (i guess in this case it should be topic application) you can assess whether that compound is carcinogenic or not for mice... however, our bodies dont work the same way, and i dont yet know what lab research fully involves :/
@@asserm.8047 We could take a human cell culture?
"The article ... is largely based off the research of Richard Weller ...", "Weller is a dermatologist ... and Chief Medical Officer of RelaxSol, a sunscreen company that ...". These 2 things are a huge red flag from this video for a start and they are right at the beginning.
One of the golden rules is to NEVER trust anyone that is trying to SELL you something. Obviously the ones selling a certain product will not tell you that you don't even need the product. Scientists that are involved in skincare products have been KNOWN to even fake their reports, sometimes with money involved.
Don't blindly believe things you see or hear online.
EXACTLY
Valid point, but who would you trust more to manufacture a superior sunscreen: a dermatologist who has the medical knowledge that would be required in creating a highly effective sunscreen, or some random businessman whose main interest is maximum profit? There are always two sides to every coin, or if you have an unique perspective, then there are an infinite number of sides to every coin. A conflict of interest alone is not sufficient to invalidate any fact they may purport, yet it is also not adequate grounds for confirmation of another's pre-existing biases. However, a conflict of interest is a warning sign, but that it is all it is, a warning sign. It's not stating that all things sourced from a conflict of interest will only serve the stronger interest of the source whether it be the truth or not. Which is the stronger interest? What means does the conflict serve, if it even serves one of the means? It is a warning sign that most should heed. If you want to know if you can trust certain research, you need to follow the source of the money all the way back to its origin, and not merely back to the funding entity. From whence does that entity receive most of its money?? Then, does that entity's major source of money receive money from elsewhere? One must trace the source of money all the way back to a source that creates its own wealth and is not reliant on other sources of money outside of what it produces. Then one can assess the source of money in regards to elements and attributes of that entity: the function of said entity, their goals, their beliefs, the types of donations they make, etc. With that knowledge, one can make a fairly reasonable, and accurate assessment of the degree of bias a specific study, or research, may contain.
Yes, the master manipulators, the ones who pull the strings behind all major global events have a system in place where, outside of a few key issues, the research will prove one side of an issue one week, and then the following week some other research will prove the opposite of the previous research, and it will go back and forth. Researchers have shown that drinking coffee regularly is beneficial for one's health, then the following week, new research has proven that as much as drinking a single cup of coffee daily is detrimental to one's health, coffee is good, coffee is bad, coffee is good, coffee is bad. We can never keep up with the currently information, and in seeing that the perspective on any subject matter usually changes back and forth every week, we naturally grow tired of trying to keep pace with the most recent research. Yet, in witnessing the research persistently flip-flop back and forth, we can never see nor sense any definitive conclusion in sight. We can not see any final answer stating that something is either good for us, or it is bad for us, or even if it is neutral. Although unintended, most of us eventually reach a threshold where we are tired from the matter, and we simply create an apathetic attitude. We simply become too tired to care about the issue any further. As we reach this state of apathy with each successive issue, our overall apathy increases, eventually reaching a state where we are indifferent to whether or not something may or may not be bad for us. This is a tactic they employ to reduce all of our cares or concerns, ultimately rendering some of us to be completely apathetic. If we no longer care about issues that were once important and significant to us, then why should we care what some theorized small group of people are doing to us? Apathetic people are easier to manipulate and to control, and they make the easiest victims.
Things are definitely not as they appear! Regarding most minor issues where the populace's beliefs bear no effect upon any of the nefarious agendas of the manipulators, they are either left alone (meaning we, the populace, may actually see them as they truly are), or they are perpetually seen within the tennis match of research such that they persistently switch back and forth from being viewed as either good or bad, this being utilized as a tactic to increase the overall apathy of the general populace. Then, for most other issues, typically the ones consider by most to be major because they affect people on a global or national level, are almost always being pushed under a false narrative by the mainstream media. The way in which people perceive these issues have the potential to affect the success the manipulators will have in achieving their various agendas. These issues need to be perceived in a manner that deviates from reality and the truth. Thus, they are persistently pushed, or presented, under a false narrative intentionally to cause a false perception of them by the populace. Thus, when one sees an issue being frequently pushed across all aspects of mainstream media (music, movies, plays, radio, newspapers, periodicals, television, including various types of shows and especially news), for an extended period of time, and in a consistent manner to paint only one possible perspective of said issue, then one is safe to assume that this perspective being intentionally pushed is assuredly a false narrative. Furthermore, I have found that the reality of these false narratives to be nearly the exact opposite of the perception that is being pushed. Thus, when the mainstream media pushes a specific viewpoint upon any issue, and they do so in a consistent manner across the entire gambit of the media, and in a fashion that leaves no alternative viewpoint for the viewer to have, one can safely assume that said viewpoint is a false narrative, and the reality of said issue can be approximated merely by taking the exact opposite of the viewpoint that is being pushed. No, things are definitely not as they appear to be.
@@ThinkerOnTheBus First of all: Thank you for your huge reply.
It's not about which sunscreen is better. It's about whether or not sunscreen is even needed at all. We already know that sunscreen in general can cause skin cancer. Cancer and other such health issues have existed less in the past, meaning that a lot of the things that we consume or use these days (including sunscreen) must actually be making things worse for us. Sunscreen should be used when you are spending long times in strong sun, like at the beach, but not daily.
Your second and last paragraphs both talk about a back and forth thing that you are trying to explain, so I'll answer them together. It depends on what kind of media you choose to follow. No, we can never trust a scientist/an organization 100%, but it does, as you said, depend on where the funds for said scientist or organization come from. The pharma-industry is known to be one of the biggest industries world-wide, especially now with covid-19. A lot of the things this industry is trying to make us think is 'normal' and needed (like even toothpaste and sunscreen and even shampoo and soap) are filled with chemicals or irritants that a lot of people get bad reactions to. Yet in this day and age people learn early on that these things are 'normal'. Toothpaste industries will show ads and supermarkets are full of these products, yet the majority of these products are not exactly good for us.
So the question is ... do we even need these things? Just because some scientist or company might be 'better' than others at creating something more or less irritating?
I have stopped using sunscreen for daily use. I say that if you try not using a certain product for a while and experience a good change/it works for you then that proves the point of this product not being necessary. And you have found this out without having to listen to a single 3rd party/media/other information source.
I say be wary. Go as natural as is possible. Don't trust everything the pharma industry or its scientists say. There is a lot of fraud in the science world too, especially from "doctors" or scientists that are trying to sell something.
If they are the only ones that understand enough to know if something is good, then they are also the only ones that know that something is bad (but cheap for them) and therefore they can sell it to everyone that isn't a scientist and have them believe things.
No, being suspicious (I assume this is the word you were talking about instead of 'apathetic', which is something entirely different) doesn't mean we are easier to manipulate. It means we don't blindly go trusting everyone. We take a look at their goals, product and so on first and think about things.
Yep, exactly. I was so pissed at the end of this video, hearing that he's selling sunscreen. As with almost everything these days, follow the money to find the source of the lies and propaganda we are being manipulated with. If money or any kind of power are being exchanged, you have to be skeptical about what you are being told, and think for yourself.
Precisely. Always ask, who funded the study. That's usually a red flag when it's the very company saying you need thier product.
Vitamin d or cancer your choice
LMAO
@Johana liebert True like vitamins and fruits
And why y'all being Rude to one another like calling
people dumb and don't come for me
@@jerrlitoyee9514 yet.... it can still damage your skin even if you don't feel or see it
@Vineterria Barrington since sunscreen was created there's has been an increase of skin cancer.
Direct exposure to sunlight is very essential and beneficial up to a certain point.
Agree completely with every single word in this video. Thanks for sharing! I wasn't aware that "sunscreen being bad for you" was going around. I'll remember that if any of my patients ask me! Great content, keep it up.
my great grandmother had bone cancer and so my grandmother inherited vitamin d deficiency. my mother doesn't wear sunscreen so i shouldn't either. in fact, i should get as much vitamin D as possible and only use sunscreen when i go to the beach. too much sunscreen can actually cause a deficiency in vitamin D which leads to other problems.
Same here. Thats an important point. Not everyone is susceptible to the same problems but often times this one issue gets toted even though the vast majority of people will never have an issue with skin cancer in their life
Your videos have helped me a lot.. Whether it is for school or my heigine! Keep up the good work 😊💕
Love these videos! You take every factor into account. Would love to see a video related to carcinogens and what the media claims can cause cancer.
This is another reminder why it’s important to read and understand the details of a study
@Google User simping hard dem
@@oraoraoraoraora2709 nothign wrong this that
You know that at least 30% ish people will just read the title and assume sunscreen is bad and wont use it anymore, not even having watched the video.
They would assume he would be talking about that sunscreen is carcinogenic then. Rather then the video's point that sunscreen blocks vitamin D creation. Which is a ridiculous point btw
Time Axl if they make a choice like that without looking for more information then it’s just natural selection at that point
Deadass looked this up because I heard it was bad........ after watching the video I now feel like I've wasted my time
and those people will be saved
Do a video on vaccines. A lot of controversies there and I'm sure your deep literary analysis would be helpful.
Unfortunately most this likely this would change no anti vaxxer's minds. They already think vaccines are part of public brainwashing that the "big pharma" do. Theres no way in hell they're going to watch nor listen to a video made by doctors.
No controversy. Just stupid people
The thing about vaccines is, as a concept, its the most groundbreaking advance humans have made since the wheel.
But there will most likely be vaccines that are somewhat harmful and doesnt do much for the greater good. Just look at opiod medicaments. No one says that medicine is harmful as a whole, but there are preparates(?) that will be extremely harmful.
if some of them were harmful(and like any other medicine, there was at least one) they would have not reach the biggest pubblic or would have been taken out from selling like any other drugs
The fact that there’s even a controversy about vaccines is a shame
There is also the option of wearing UPF clothing or jackets when repeated application of sunscreen is impractical or irritates the skin.
I had melanoma removed from my arm a couple years ago. I burn through sunscreen so my risk for more is already higher. Daily use of my sun jacket and switching to a zinc oxide/titanium dioxide sunscreen for my face and exposed skin has been a game changer. Super easy to grab a jacket and go. Sunscreen goes on just under my tinted moisturizer or powder. Ive yet to have another sunburn. The sun jackets are surprisingly cool and can be dipped in water on hot days as they air dry quickly.
Wow, I did not know this! Thanks for this video!
Chemicals + Light Exposure = Oxidation of Chemicals.
Great video! - would love to see more videos of this kind!
Great video! Would love to see more of these types, if possible. It's like research myth busting
Love this video, and you should do a video on the effects on running and which is better sprinting or long marathon races for the body
He probably would if he could find a sports equipment company to sponsor him, so he could make some money out of selling their products with his cherry picked research.
Long marathon, that's we are built for and evolved for. We are the land animal with the longest stamina. We evolved to hunt by exhausting our prey over long distances, thanks to sweat and funnily enough our ass.
Long marathon much better for the body but also can beat your body up. An extreme marathon will put you put of commission. But in general, training for endurance running is healthier than sprints. Why? Many reasons. You become heavier if you train for sprints because you grow large muscles . Large muscles sound healthy but are not healthy. You have to eat more, you have to expend and use more energy, you use more growth pathways and therefore you die sooner. This is actually well researched. Whereas endurance running, your muscles become small but very practical and enduring. You get more cardiovascular benefits because you keep your heart rate raised for a longer time. Your heart is going to become ultra efficient, have a huge stroke volume and your VO2 max will go througg the roof. The one thing you have to look out for in endurance sports is your joints though. If you prioritize recovery, don’t overtrain, don’t run extremely long races as they take a toll on your body and can put you out of commission for weeks, practice proper form, you will likely not struggle with joint injury.
Tl;dr long marathon training actually increases your lifespan and anaerobic/lifting/sprinting you can argue has the potential to decrease your lifespan
*The hype of vitamin supplements do they actually work?*
Yes and no they can be toxic if you just use them because “you’re suppose to”. If you don’t actually have any vitamin deficiency that you know about from a reliable source like a doctor, this is when vitamins can actually be very harmful. There is many evidence (which I don’t have links to you’ll have to do your own research ) that in some cases vitamin supplements actually caused cancer. If you eat a normal diet you most likely won’t need any kind of vitamin supplement you get PLENTY of vitamins for the normal foods you eat there’s no need for vitamin supplements which could actually cause more harm then good.
Said Abdi *vitamin supplements can become harmful
Said Abdi but for other vitamins like hair vitamins or something else I’m not really sure
@@lomein222 thats not true, if your in normal level you always can take to to get to higher levels withoud overdosing, let's say the normal range is to be between 200-600 units in blood, and your in 300, if your take vitamin d to bump up those levels to the higher end, 500-600, thats perfectly fine and nothing bad will happen.
@Gabagool All essential vitamins and these days sadly those things like meat also contain a lot of medications that the animals get to stay healthy (more meat production and less loss of money for industries).
You are freaking amazing. Your contents Never disappoint!
Great video! I am curious what you think of some of these dietary trends like the ketogenic diet, or a video on BPA in plastic bottles, and their effect on the endocrine system.
Good suggestions! I am interested as well
Keto is crap for weight loss. I mean it works, obv. Blocking your body from an essential nutrient will do that. But at what cost? And it's not sustainable for most. It was originally designed as a diet for epilepsy sufferers. Because the risks of seizures outweighs the limitations of keto. Sure, if I had to drop some pounds in a hurry for an event, yeah, I'd consider it. But keto being touted as a perfectly fine healthy life style is misleading. It's crash dieting, and makes fat intake easier to increase.
@@asideofaioli4630 keto:
[our kidneys and liver have left the chat]
Keto is a suicidal diet.
Heard BPA is terrible for men, prob for women too, as far as keto it has its cons but the saying "The best diet is the one you can stick to" always has a good amount of validity to it imo
Yay Doctor J. Thanks for making great videos.
Good series. Hope to see you cover different topics in the future.
It would seem that rates of skin cancer have increased in the last 50 or 60 years, while prior to that, this disease wasn’t an issue. Since the sun hasn’t changed in the last 50 or 60 years then clearly something else has (and I don’t think it’s because we spend more time in the sun). The reason for the increase in skin cancer is probably related to a change in the diet that occurred over the last few decades. I would say almost certainly an increase in Omega 6 oils in the diet and a reduction in saturated fats. This has resulted in a change in the physical make up of cell membranes and, as unsaturated fats are easily oxidized and more inflammatory than saturated fats, caused us to burn more easily under the sun. Indeed, people today burn much more quickly than they did in the 60s.
Sunscreen is a non issue.
What you need to do is reduce the Omega 6 oil in your diet - drastically. However, the half life of fat in the body is about 2 years, so if you start today you might be able to get down to a decent level in about 7 years. Unfortunately, omega 6 oils are in just about every kind of processed food available so eliminating them is very difficult.
Could be because it is getting more attention now and it was underreported before.
You are absolutely right. This video makes no mention of that. People are consuming shit food and not enough animal fats. Their omega 6 is so high from the seed oils that they cook are food in today. And people are so used to going to buy a product that will offer up a quick fix but in reality makes things worse such as sunscreen.
Carcinogenic plant oils/linolenic acid.
Great video, incredibly informative! At 8:50 did you mean to say 'melasma' instead of 'melanoma'?
my dad says sunscreen is a scam, and media says sunscreen is good and stops wrinkles.. HELP
My dad have never used sunscreen in his life,and we live in a coutry when it hits 50c°in summer ,and he's good n healthy 😅
i really like this new direction for med school insiders
love this series!!
Could you do a video about the actual health effects of protein supplements/powder that are not FDA regulated?
May I subtitle your great video so more people can get this important information?
Please, that would be great!
So I posted this in a group on Facebook. Facebook took it down saying it goes against community standards? Why?
Hi! What are the effects of oxybenzone on your body? I use sunscreen everyday but I just realized they have that ingredient.
New video topic request: Do recreational use of marijuana cause brain degeneration?
Hi Dr. Jubbal! Thanks for the information! Could you do a video on Lasik surgery safety and side effects? Thanks!
Great video
Can you talk about how iron supplement bottles from the pharmacy and the hospital say "CONSUME WITH FOOD OR MILK" when you are not supposed to take iron with milk!!
Could I suggest a topic area/s? Inflammation. Specifically, after a very bad sunburn in my youth, my GP who specialises in mole mapping can see the subdermal inflammation 20yrs later in the places that were affected. I also have post- traumatic arthritis. Long term inflammation is considered bad, but how bad? Treatable? Diagnosable? Does it have implications chemically that go on the affect other systems or mental states? Or is it under a threshold of bother when compared to other ailments?
I would look into red light therapy or infrared light therapy
I honestly don’t know too much about this issue and I just so happened to stumble upon this video while binge-watching your channel. However, I had read some articles claiming the ingredients in sunscreens were bad for you since they have properties that aid absorption of the lotion into the skin. The articles said these ingredients might cause skin cancer instead of the sun itself.
As someone who uses sunscreen daily, it was concerning for me to read those articles.
Now all this information is just off the top of my head and I’d read those articles a few months ago so my memory might not even be accurate.
We can tell from this video that the article “Is Sunscreen the New Margarine” is pretty much a fallacy. But how do we spot inconsistencies in articles or research that seem much more sensible?
Please discuss abt the truth behind using vitamin c serum against fighting free radicals on applied topically to the skin
New video topic request: skin anti-aging modalities?
would love to have a video about the following topics: AI as an aid in med vs replacing certain jobs like radiologist? supplements: so many new companies that ask you questions and then send daily supplements for you based on your needs- just a scam? efficient napping. your take on genetic testing like 23 and me
Not sure if you already have done a video on the Ansel (?) hypothesis but if not please do
People that go outside (get sun exposure) are more likely to be active and therefore lower their CVD risk
The sun isn't that bad as people say it is
Yesss
Omg please do apple cider vinegar once and for all🍅🥃🏃🏿♀️
[how the mechanism of a chemical works to block the suns rays: how the skin functions with that blocking chemical] that is what I'm looking for
Is the sunscreen your currently using good for people with eczema?
The sunscreen he's currently pushing is good for his bank account.
@@Jen.K 🤣👌
Now sun screen is good or not ?
I've come to believe it's not as good for you as touted. If you protect your skin, it becomes more delicate (like a baby's bottom). So imagine what happens...you protect it on day and not another. Your actually making your face more vulnerable for damage. I think it's definitely a must when your at the beach exposing yourself to excess sun.
So, That's why Drs. say you must wear it daily...because you've created a vulnerable situation. I noticed when I wore sunblock, I actually developed tons of freckles. Maybe because it was a poor product or on the days I didn't wear it..I got burned. Maybe there's that saying of protective layer, let your body protect itself.
or plan on daily wear.
I really wish my parents would use sunscreen. They saw one article about how using sunscreen can give you a higher risk of cancer and since then they only use it when it's like 30°C or more and they fear being sun burned. My mom just says that she has darker pigment so she doesn't need the higher spf. She still looks very young for her age so I think that's why she doesn't make the connection. The same can't be said about my dad. He has lighter pigment and his skin looks awful. He insists that every skin product that exists does not work and that they everyone is in it for the money. He grew up in the southern parts of Sweden and his family were farmers. All of them have the same skin problems. No one has been diagnosed with skin cancer yet so I guess that is why he has not made the connection.
Started wearing sunscreen but as a young person I found every time I wore it I got burnt?
What about the study saying it enters your bloodstream after and hour?
@9:35 are these the physical vs chemical blockers?
So if I use spf 50 underneath a tanning oil is that safe ?? I’m fair skinned and it’s almost summer in Australia and I want to get a nice tan
A 'nice tan' is good protection from skin cancer, as long as you develop your tan slowly and safely and never allow your skin to burn. Natural, direct sunlight is good for our bodies in so many ways, but as in everything, moderation and balance is the key.
@@Jen.K thank you for this very sensible comment 🌻
Please research and present study about how many times we should eat during the day and what are the benefits of yam to cancer treatment, skin problems, dengue fever. Thanks a lot.
What kind of yam? Dioscorea or Ipomoea. If Dioscorea.
The major varieties/species:
white yam, chinese yam, ube, air potato
Or The minor varieties/species:
lesser yam, bitter yam, cush-cush yam
C Tak you should eat two times a day not more.This is the best for digestion
I’m black, never heard of sunscreen until I came to Europe, never heard of cancer until I came to Europe 🤷🏾♂️
Go make your own county a Nice place!
Keep it natural folks. God don’t make mistakes people do
Very true❤️❤️❤️❤️....God is always right....It's the humans who always go wrong😁😁
Yeah I completely agree. That’s why I stay naked and just cover myself with leaves. My family and I live in the wolf because every chemical in the food and clothes isn’t made by God but humans.🥹
This is quite simple really. People in africa/ india etc... have never used sunscreen the skin cancer rates in india account for 1% of all cancers.
Because they have dark skin, they are adapted for it
@@samanthaw3859 No amount of tan is good for your skin, if you are out in the sun to the point where you tan, you have already caused permanent damage that accumulates over time. It’s good to have some sun exposure but not too much.
Yeah cause they are dark skin
great i wear sunscreen everyday
Same! No wrinkles team
i wear sunscreen but.. my face burn after using it
Inês Silveira lies... I have smile lines on a bad day lmao
Do you reapply during the day?? In winter?
079 yep even in winter UVA/UVB can cause skin damage- especially with reflective snow. Protect yourself with sunscreen. Most have you reapply every 80-90 minutes, but I do every 2hours or so
Question for clarity 🙋🏽, does sunscreen, say on a darker pigmented person, slowdown or inhibit the production of melanin?? 🤔
No, the only thing sunscreen does is block the sun's rays and prevent sunburn/ sun damage. Has nothing to do with melanin production :)
@@ally-sy2br ooooh☺️
Thank you Ally
If you're a brown or black person please stop using that shit.
Yesss let's gooo finnally I have no regrets
Is this relevant to the controversy of sunscreen causing cancer??? I have an assignment in this pls replyyyyyy
Hello Doctor! I am 16 year old high school student and my dream is to become a Doctor. I just want to ask if having a hand tremor/ hand shaking disqualifies me to become a doctor? Thank you!
I just read that last night! I immediatly turned to physical barrier sunscreens hahaha😂
Let's look at the reality here, the real skin cancer epidemic came with the introduction of sunscreen in the 70's, Vitamin D is a hormone your body produces that is essential to support your immune system. Strong immune system = anti cancer (dying cells that are unable to be properly eliminated and discarded by the immune system), the reason why skin cancer is more common amongst the elderly is for 2 reasons, a lot of old people have a poor life style and poor diet, those who DID get damaged skin from prolonged sun exposure, spend a lot of their later life indoors and away from the sun, so poor later lifestyle, weakened body through age- you're going to have a greater likely hood of getting cancer, on the other hand the carcinogenic chemicals are another factor in the mix which are being soaked right into your blood stream and lymphatic system.
Sunscreen can only block certain harmful UV rays, but not the most harmful radiation spectrum of it, so you're blocking your skin from the beneficial rays of the sun that are supposed to support your immune system to aid in protection against the more harmful ones (along with healthy activity, good diet). Therefore.. you're trying to beat nature by protecting yourself against something supposed to make you stronger to make you live harmonious with the harmful exposures of nature.
I had an acquaintance who had to publish a study by using specific mouses that lived under specific conditions. In the course of her study she became aware that one of her mouse batch might have been contaminated. Anyway the specific living conditions of these mouses was not guaranted. Her supervisor was aware of the situation but he pushed her to publish her study asap. When we talk she was facing a dilemna because the supervisor could have a negative impact on the rest of her career. I dont know what she decided to do. But I told this story to another acquaintance who studied veterinary at the same school which by the away is worldwide renowned, he wasnt surprised and reacted like this kind of things happens more often than one might think.
That is why you cannot purely form your opinions on statistical studies, rather use them as one data point to reach a reasonable opinion.
@@chadliampearcy ok, thanks!
@@chocolatefudge5263 Try studying logic starting from propositional logic or a discrete mathematics course then basic game theory If you have the time.
@@chadliampearcy looks difficult. But i like math and game theory seems to be exciting so I'll look into it. Thanks! Are you a teacher?
@@chocolatefudge5263. I'm planning to be but at at the moment I'm only a student. Do not get into any complicated games. Start simply. There's a two player game where you both share ten fingers in total and each turn you, then your opponent may close one or two fingers. You win by being the player to close the last finger. Is there a way to guarantee a win in such a game?
My ancestors survived without sunscreen for thousands of years, I think i can survive without it too.
I read this same article.
Thank you
Yeah I rather don't get enough vitamine D than a itchy red skin with rosacea. No, no.
All the sunscreens really piss off my seb derm. 😔
Electromagnetic Radiation and Cancer 🤔
Im curious about this bcs today we live in a world full of wifi
Take chem! Search up ionizing vs non-ionizing radiation. Wifi would be non-ionizing and is not able to penetrate your skin and break your DNA, so it would not result in any cancer.
@@lenablueberry52 Thank you, this comment was made 2years ago. Now I know the truth since I'm now in medschool. 😊 Hahaha I already forgot abt this comment
@@athirahsalmin9402 congrats on getting into medschool!!! I’m going to start studying for the mcat soon. Do you have any tips?
@@lenablueberry52 Ohmy hahhaha.. I never knew I would make friends here on YT 😂. TBH I don't know much abt MCAT bcs the system is a bit different here in Malaysia.. I went to do my foundation in local university, and now am currently in 2nd year of medschool. IDK, just study smart and make sure to take care of your health and social life too~. After all, medicine (career) is not everything life has to offer. Trust the process and enjoy the journey along the way. Medicine is not a sprint, it's always a marathon. It's not about who'll be the first one to finish, but rather more about perseverance. Once you get your MBBS degree, all the past failure does not matter much. You can do this!! XOXO
@@athirahsalmin9402 I always wanted to visit Malaysia! Thank you for the advice. I’m definitely going to use it!
All my elderly reletives are farmers or where construction workers who spent all their lives in the sun and none of them got skin cancer. Then there is a 23 year old neighbour who got diagnosed with skin cancer. How does "science" explain this???
Life is strange..
People with darker skin have a chance of not having skin cancer than people with lighter skin.
what if it’s just people who take better care of their health are more likely to use sunscreen? causing an illusionary correlation?
also, i would love to see a video on the effects of air pollution (especially cuz we are surrounded by cars)
Not to go against a man who's far more educated than me, but the sunscreen he uses scores one of the worst ratings on ewg website..... Both the safety of the ingredients, and the actual protection that youre getting is poor. EWG are one of the only unbiased genuiine sources of information out there, so I assume they're accurate on this.
Huhhh!!! Someone tell me how do I protect my face from sun while being in the school assembly without using suncreen
Wait wait wait.... If the synthesis of Vitamin D only occurs if people do not properly put sunscreen on, then wont putting sunscreen the way its intended prevent Vitamin D for being produced?
Dr Jubbal back at it again!
Yeah sure, meanwhile I know ppl who don't bother with self-care regimens who look unfazed (age gracefully). Were all told we need this or that yet some ppl will always have deformities; whether, if it's their skin or their hair won't grow etc. Scientists love to preach a potion that works for all.
Sunscreen is bad melanin is good.
superduperjoi melanin
Even having a ton of melanin wont protect u from harsh UV rays but lol I see what u mean
Kaml9819 black also get damage
Desert Moon if you read it correctly I wrote “melanin is less than sunscreen” meaning everyone should wear sunscreen💕🧴
Funny that the sunscreen of choice for you provides "little kickbacks"
I had low vitamin D.. I got breast cancer
This isn’t fair I only wore sunscreen because I had terrible acne scars
So is it good or bad to use sunscreen ??
So if you keep replying every two hours what is the effect of those chemicals sinking in to your skin? Something bad in sure
Endocrine disruptors
I thoght this video was good until you said to avoid parabens
I use it to prevent wrinkles
Eat healthy and stop stressing
Why are chemical sunscreens being villified? Yes, some particular ingredients have been found harmful in one way or another, but definitely far from all.
Amanda Sjöberg They make it seem like sunscreen having chemicals in it is bad for you. Literally everything is made out of chemicals and most chemicals in sunscreen is not harmful at all. People are just manipulated so easily.
It seems to be that it "harms fish in the sea", but I don't go swimming on the sea Haha. I just casually wear it.
Jeromaline Mohan it still makes its way make Into the sea you moron
Keto vs plant based diet
Intermittent fasting
I hate wearing sunscreen. It makes my eyes sting and my skin oily.
My mum's just told me about that
TLDW the summary of the study was:
"People who spend a lot of time in the sun wearing sunscreen are healthy, so sunscreen is bad."
....🤨 Yeah, exactly.
Every example you showed of a person applying sunscreen is white, I noticed...
How about a video on how research shows zinc oxide releasing electrons when exposed to sunlight thereby increasing cancer risk.
0:33 thecnology