The reason cabs are high on conventional trucks is to allow the driver to see over the tops of most vehicles in order to see any traffic issues ahead, giving time for the driver to react, if your carting 40tonnes sitting at ground level, you cant even see over the car in front, hugely dangerous.
@Monkeys Uncle Cameras fail, get dirty and require you to look away from the road. They are great for some applications like backing up but I wouldn't want to rely on them for looking forward.
@@sdmfcfh1283 , Usually, trucks drive close to each other to save fuel so obviously they cannot oversee traffic. I do not slam my breaks in the rare occasion im behind a truck, but im also not driving a heavy weight vehicle. With this heavy weight comes responsibility.
As a ex trucker I won't be driving this "the ability to survive a accident in this form are poor " but with modifications and knew technology this would make a excellent robot truck, for long haul journeys. Obviously the concept is way ahead of its time and is probably ready for reintroduction but with new technology as previously stated.
I haven't looked at any concepts of robot trucks, but like the other guy said, they sound unrealistic. I don't believe we have AI smart enough to recognize how stupid people can be like reckless pedestrians throwing themselves in front of a truck. Can the AI recognize other drivers being distracted by how they're swerving? Can they look around to see road conditions ahead like ice? Can they avoid obstacles in the road? Do they know how to correctly maneuver around construction? They would need to rely on someone to change their flat tires too. I don't think we can have semis driving entirely by an AI.
If the cooling system issues are addressed, as you can imagine, it has a lot of those due to a significant lack of airflow over the radiator, it could work. Maybe not as an over the road rig, but definitely as an in town, and congested areas truck for sure. visibility wouldn't be an issue either, just install cameras on the top of the trailer. The concept seems simple enough to carry out. Survivability is a concern, however I'm going to bet we have found solutions for this even now.
You know I never really thought of that tractor being part of that show but I see it now. I saw the rig that incorporated the helicopter back a few years ago languishing in West Texas. Show was kinda cool. Tim russ? Had no idea.
A death trap. 0:35 Had these two collided head-on, everything under the grille of the VOLVO would have continued into the front axle of the Steiwinter MERCEDES. 🔁
Ich glaube mich zu erinnern, daß ich diese Art glaube ich Mitte der 1970er gesehen habe. Einer der Vorteile war, daß das Zugfahrzeug abgekoppelt als PKW eingestuft werden konnte, ohne Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung.
If they would have had better aerodynamics for the trailers I think it might have help with the fuel economy issues. However, the European legislation announced that from 1990 onwards, the total length of a truck would have to be limited to 18.75 meters, of which the usable loading area couldn't be longer than 15.65 meters. was the final nail in the concepts coffin.
IF you were driving on a highway and a deer jumped out in front of you.. You would be DEAD instantly... Sitting that LOW to the ground... Scary... Or if a truck blew a tire ahead of you. Seems dangerous.. Yet hella cool !!
2:51 Aus Wikipedia: EuroCombi: "In der Europäischen Union wurde aufgrund der EG-Richtlinie 96/53/EG vom 25. Juli 1996 die Möglichkeit geschaffen, längere Nutzfahrzeuge bzw. Kombinationen einzusetzen, die auf bestimmten Straßen und Strecken eine Ausnahmegenehmigung erhalten könnten." Also: Längenbeschränkung aufgehoben!
Pomysł tyleż wspaniały co idiotyczny. Teraz w dobie kiedy wielkimi krokami zbliżamy się do autonomizacji jazdy takie rozwiązanie miałoby duży sens. Ale jak wyobrażę sobie prowadzenie czegoś takiego osobiście to sobie tego nie wyobrażam 🤣 Widoczność prawie żadna. Niewygodna jak cholera pozycja nie wspominając o generalnie klaustrofobicznej kabinie. Ktoś miał niezły odjazd budując to coś. Rozumiem koncepcję ale przejść do budowy tego czegoś to trzeba było być lekko pierdol.... Przecież to by powodowało tak ogromną ilość wypadków drogowych że aż ciężko to sobie wyobrazić.
Hmmm... The design concept could actually work well for an RV. It would work like a 5th wheel, but with more room in the trailer. Detached, the tractor could be used as local transportation.
I think it was Fruehauf Trailers that tried this in the 70's with a Cummins 903 V8 engine. I know it was a 903 because I worked at Cummins Ontario at that time but can't truly remember the trailer company but am 95% sure of Fruehauf.
Wątpię czy wogóle chodziło o aerodynamikę bo w tym wydaniu na pewno nie była ona lepszą jak w standardowym ciągniku. Raczej o większą pojemność naczepy.
This was massively ahead of its game. However, I bet, before long we see a return to this. After all it makes good economic and logistical sense for obvious reasons and with the limiting factors of this unit now pretty much addressed with the leaps in technology, it will be on our roads before this decade is out.
Sorry, this thing is just a classic bit of 70s neo-futuristic avant-garde art. It's all form and no function. Would have been great as a prop in a movie, but not much else..
@@Kiwi_NZ610 I don't know if they run or not. They aren't in practical use though, because beyond their awkward design, transportation code works against them.
@@snapon666 - I drove a flat-nose school bus for a little over two years in ‘99/‘00/‘01, and while a large vehicle barreling at high speed does take much longer to stop, that’s just a reason to drive more slowly, and there’s no particular visibility advantage with regard to stopping to be gained by perching up high. It certainly *feels* more powerful to sit up high: I used to love pulling up to within an inch of someone’s s.u.v. at an intersection before turning the steering wheel, since it freaked those road-hogging suburban morons right out (on a flat-nose, the front bus wheel is behind the bus driver, and so the vehicle’s tight turning radius always surprises other drivers). But if you need to stop for an obstacle ahead, you can see that obstacle as easily from ground-level as from sitting up five or six feet, obstacles aren’t invisible when looked at head-on.
@@danopticon have to totally disagree,, drove a ford cab over and an international cab over and I worked at the white freightliner plant building new ones ...visibility is a Major benefit of being higher a tractor as low as the one shown would not be able to see beyond the suv in front of them ..the same reason I don't follow behind a vehicle on my bike I want to see around them as far as possible down the road
@@snapon666 - No offense, but the obvious reply is that the s.u.v. ahead of you - and not anything beyond it - is the hazard … and if you’re tailgating that s.u.v. so closely that you need to see *beyond* it to anticipate if *it* may suddenly stop because of whatever *it’s* tailgating, then *you’re already all doing it wrong.* I also drove a 40-ish ft. Panavision straight-truck around Chicago for a film production company, and driving that thing fully-laden at just 15mph through residential streets, the rules were never to be closer than *50 feet* behind the nearest vehicle, or three-ish car lengths; barreling at 35mph down the average stroad, readers may be surprised to learn one should drive a fully-laden 40-ft. straight truck *no closer than 250 feet* behind the nearest moving vehicle, or *15 to 20 car lengths,* and driving 55mph down the highway (and no faster, because you truly could kill DOZENS of people), *the closest behind another car your truck should be is 350-ish feet, or nearly two football fields’ length.* And in a standstill situation, you *still* leave a full car-length (or two!) between your truck and the car ahead of you, in case that car stalls, so you have room to pull around it without reversing. That’s what I remember from the Illinois Class B CDL classes and the accompanying test (with passenger, school bus, air brakes, and hazardous materials endorsements), and it’s all worth taking seriously, because it IS life-and-death … for others, even more so than for you. So again, from a distance of two football fields behind a speeding s.u.v. on the highway, or even from 50 feet behind an s.u.v. driving 15mph down a residential street, what you really need to focus on is that *one s.u.v.,* and whatever’s to its left and right. Does it feel more in-command of everything to have a crow’s nest view of the road ahead? Sure. But if to maneuver properly you absolutely *need* to see around the vehicle ahead of you, then you’re already doing it wrong: you’re not supposed to tailgate so closely that something they do may surprise you, you focus on *the car ahead* and leave *yourself* plenty of room and time to react!! Now, is the obvious solution to require special licenses for s.u.v. drivers? Absolutely. Get those menaces off the road. Nearly everyone driving an s.u.v. is a jackass with no business driving a tank, just endangering everyone on the road. And nearly 100% of those morons belong in Mini Coopers … or better yet, bikes. But within the realm of what can be done individually: when driving a truck, just don’t tailgate the moron in the s.u.v.! Many lives may depend on it.
@@danopticon go learn how to ride a motorcycle one of the first things you learn is to look down the road not in front of you and that applies to over the road also ...you can NOT realistically leave 50 ft in front of you on any city street in the US ..that space would immediately be filled by 3 suv's a bicycle and an old lady with a cart ...looking down the road while keeping tabs on the idiot in front of you is just common sense ...you don't want to be surprised
Der kommt doch bestimmt nicht so weit, weil bestimmt von dem Fahrzeug der Stauraum für das Benzin sehr klein ist, vorallem dann wenn dieses flache Fahrzeug mehrere Tonnen mit sich noch mitschieben muss.
What they should have done is built power assist into that gigantic trailer and it wouldn't matter what truck you use to pull such heavy equipment. I hope they build large camper trailers with electric power assist motors so i can be moved with a Honda Accord.
if we could remove the right part of the cab and replace it with an radiator on it it could be fixed for the right side of the mirror use camera hey im genious (dab)
Niezwykle ciekawy i futurystyczny projekt, ale także niezwykle niebezpieczny. Przy jakimkolwiek zderzeniu, kierowca automatycznie jest trupem.
They basically got a Airport Pushback Truck and turned it into a cargo carrier.
that is what i thought after first seeing this, looks very similar to those flat pushback trucks
The reason cabs are high on conventional trucks is to allow the driver to see over the tops of most vehicles in order to see any traffic issues ahead, giving time for the driver to react, if your carting 40tonnes sitting at ground level, you cant even see over the car in front, hugely dangerous.
They're coming out with a device that lets you see from angles and places you're not at. I believe they call it a "camara" or something. Maybe camera.
@Monkeys Uncle Cameras fail, get dirty and require you to look away from the road. They are great for some applications like backing up but I wouldn't want to rely on them for looking forward.
Trucks just need to keep distance like any other vehicle on the road. When a truck drives in front of me I also cannot oversee the other traffic.
@@pcdispatch so when that truck drives in front of you, do you slam your breaks on to immediately set that safe distance?
@@sdmfcfh1283 , Usually, trucks drive close to each other to save fuel so obviously they cannot oversee traffic. I do not slam my breaks in the rare occasion im behind a truck, but im also not driving a heavy weight vehicle. With this heavy weight comes responsibility.
I remember seen this in the TransTel german channel when I was a child.Good times.
German Design - as usual an answer to a problem that never existed
As a ex trucker I won't be driving this "the ability to survive a accident in this form are poor " but with modifications and knew technology this would make a excellent robot truck, for long haul journeys. Obviously the concept is way ahead of its time and is probably ready for reintroduction but with new technology as previously stated.
Honestly I just don't see robo trucks ever being viable. But this thing would have made a hell of a day cab
@@Kitchfox they're like a year away. Then after that we won't have to worry about truckers who are afraid to get vaccinated. 😆
@@monkeysuncle2816 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣👍🏿.
I haven't looked at any concepts of robot trucks, but like the other guy said, they sound unrealistic. I don't believe we have AI smart enough to recognize how stupid people can be like reckless pedestrians throwing themselves in front of a truck.
Can the AI recognize other drivers being distracted by how they're swerving?
Can they look around to see road conditions ahead like ice?
Can they avoid obstacles in the road?
Do they know how to correctly maneuver around construction?
They would need to rely on someone to change their flat tires too.
I don't think we can have semis driving entirely by an AI.
If the cooling system issues are addressed, as you can imagine, it has a lot of those due to a significant lack of airflow over the radiator, it could work. Maybe not as an over the road rig, but definitely as an in town, and congested areas truck for sure. visibility wouldn't be an issue either, just install cameras on the top of the trailer. The concept seems simple enough to carry out. Survivability is a concern, however I'm going to bet we have found solutions for this even now.
This wouldn’t be able to drive to my house, it would bottom out at the 1st pothole. Can you imagine going over a speed bump 😂.
driving this around corner without hitting something is a wonder lmfao
If you crash you die. Another issue is that I see no cooling air openings. In a hot place like Arizona this thing will over heat.
Imagine dying in a head on collision with a curb
You know I never really thought of that tractor being part of that show but I see it now. I saw the rig that incorporated the helicopter back a few years ago languishing in West Texas. Show was kinda cool. Tim russ? Had no idea.
Я его видел только в 80 годы на картинке в журнале За рулëм.
You think they would have made the front of the container a little more aerodynamic.
You would lose storage space that way which is the point if the whole thing
@Franz Rupert but the other pojnt of this thing was better fuel economy...
Flooded road will be a problem
Low visibility will be aproblem
no offroad capability, which does happen very often by surprise.
Sooo many problems, as a driver I’m glad this did not catch on.
There were similar vehicles in the US and none of them scrap ever got certified by DOT. Thank God...!!!
This reminds me some what of a yard goat the large trailer height looks to be used loading cargo planes
They need to race this :D
A death trap. 0:35 Had these two collided head-on, everything under the grille of the VOLVO would have continued into the front axle of the Steiwinter MERCEDES. 🔁
Current Location: Drei König, Brettingen (Germany)
Bettingen...
@@AlpoB. Tippfehler. Kannste behalten.
@@NoThBand Deine blöde Antwort kannst auch behalten. Änder lieber deinen Kommentar, so dass die Info auch stimmt.
@@AlpoB. gähn....
That cab is pretty similar to what the have on several of the larger crains.
Acho muito lindo esse modelo de carreta eles deveriam de reviver esse projeto
I remember watching the highway man back in the day
Me too! I only remember it as being a 2 hour pilot movie. Didn't see anything come out beyond that on TV.
How many where made? And if there is only one why is it abandoned, should be in a museum..
Beautiful Truck
❤ Highwayman, so cool ❤
I bet you it would work out as a good battery powered semi now it
No it can't, changing it to battery power solves zero issues with the original and only adds new issues.
The idea was great, and visibility could nowadays easily get resolved with cameras.
D.o.t. would never allow camera systems as primary means of vision.
Ich glaube mich zu erinnern, daß ich diese Art glaube ich Mitte der 1970er gesehen habe. Einer der Vorteile war, daß das Zugfahrzeug abgekoppelt als PKW eingestuft werden konnte, ohne Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung.
If they would have had better aerodynamics for the trailers I think it might have help with the fuel economy issues. However, the European legislation announced that from 1990 onwards, the total length of a truck would have to be limited to 18.75 meters, of which the usable loading area couldn't be longer than 15.65 meters. was the final nail in the concepts coffin.
It reminds me of something I barely remember from Thunderbirds
IF you were driving on a highway and a deer jumped out in front of you.. You would be DEAD instantly... Sitting that LOW to the ground... Scary... Or if a truck blew a tire ahead of you. Seems dangerous.. Yet hella cool !!
How did Mark "Jacko" Jackson end up in this show. He is an Australian, an Ausralian rules football player, I don't remember the show at all.
2:51 Aus Wikipedia: EuroCombi: "In der Europäischen Union wurde aufgrund der EG-Richtlinie 96/53/EG vom 25. Juli 1996 die Möglichkeit geschaffen, längere Nutzfahrzeuge bzw. Kombinationen einzusetzen, die auf bestimmten Straßen und Strecken eine Ausnahmegenehmigung erhalten könnten."
Also: Längenbeschränkung aufgehoben!
It looks scary to drive without any overview. In a normal truck you have a much better view over the traffic.
Pomysł tyleż wspaniały co idiotyczny.
Teraz w dobie kiedy wielkimi krokami zbliżamy się do autonomizacji jazdy takie rozwiązanie miałoby duży sens.
Ale jak wyobrażę sobie prowadzenie czegoś takiego osobiście to sobie tego nie wyobrażam 🤣
Widoczność prawie żadna.
Niewygodna jak cholera pozycja nie wspominając o generalnie klaustrofobicznej kabinie.
Ktoś miał niezły odjazd budując to coś.
Rozumiem koncepcję ale przejść do budowy tego czegoś to trzeba było być lekko pierdol....
Przecież to by powodowało tak ogromną ilość wypadków drogowych że aż ciężko to sobie wyobrazić.
Co to za muzyka? Czyjego autorstwa?
Hmmm... The design concept could actually work well for an RV. It would work like a 5th wheel, but with more room in the trailer. Detached, the tractor could be used as local transportation.
I can't imagine reducing visibility and driver eye-line height wouldn't cause more accidents.
I think it was Fruehauf Trailers that tried this in the 70's with a Cummins 903 V8 engine. I know it was a 903 because I worked at Cummins Ontario at that time but can't truly remember the trailer company but am 95% sure of Fruehauf.
In North America most drivers wouldn't want to drive a cab over, let alone that thing.
You wouldn't want to rear-end a family hatchback in one of those - oof.
The only vehicle that could tow that trailer had to be that tractor?
Stretched out Pete could tow it
Honestly id drive that thing without the trailer... Imagine pulling up on a car meet with that thing
Laughed out the function
@@JohnSmith-fq3rg?
Wątpię czy wogóle chodziło o aerodynamikę bo w tym wydaniu na pewno nie była ona lepszą jak w standardowym ciągniku.
Raczej o większą pojemność naczepy.
Nice system for roll on- roll off loads
A nightmare with the only intent to make more room for cargo.
This was massively ahead of its game. However, I bet, before long we see a return to this. After all it makes good economic and logistical sense for obvious reasons and with the limiting factors of this unit now pretty much addressed with the leaps in technology, it will be on our roads before this decade is out.
it will probably be used once self driving is ubiquitous because the largest downside of this design is safety.
Not a chance..
@@LOL60345if you make it self driving it would literally just be a cube driving down the road because it wouldnt even need a cab
yeah you can see from the perspective of a toddler! totally ahead of its time.. (i meant to say totally a pos)
Sorry, this thing is just a classic bit of 70s neo-futuristic avant-garde art. It's all form and no function. Would have been great as a prop in a movie, but not much else..
In the film The Highwayman, wasn't "Jacko" an Australian Wrestler as well as an actor?
I just googled it and he's a former Australian Football player who became an actor. Sorry for any confusion on my part.
I believe he did a series of Energizer battery TV ads too, following the popularity of the show. Quirky dude.
@@1SqueakyWheel Thanks, now that you mention it that does seem vaguely familiar and at my age I SHOULD remember these things. Thanks and take care.
@@david.m.304 "Oi!"
He also tried singing, had a single called "I'm an individual"
why does it have a wardrobe with a tiny spotlight pointed at the passenger
Looks very Gerry Anderson!
Y se maneja acostado o como pregunto
It's a coffin on wheels!!!!!🤣
Stream line the cab and the put a big box on top of it, I wonder why there weren’t any efficiency gains…..😂
Won't be able to recover from a skid/Jackknife with this cargo carrier.
THE HIGHWAYMAN: THE STORY
How about a hot lap @ Nurburg with just the tow rig.
A pozycja za kierownicą nie była problemem? Musiało się siedzieć zajebiście.
Jak w zwykłym samochodzie
Nie chciałbym być na miejscu kierowcy przy wystrzale opony z przodu. Wybuch pewnie rozwalił by kabinę a kierowca tarł dupa o asfalt.
Anybody know the name / artist of this song?
Imagine murkin a deer with that.
Lmao! That would be very bad.
Lift this thing, add spinners, spoilers, 60 inch wheels, sunroof and underbody LED’s, and start pushing hummers and gwagons off the road.
Não poderia hoje ser elétrico ?
Not to mention the complete lack of ground clearance.
Should have named it the Pompadour.
damn i didnt know tuvoc was in the highwayman
Would be difficult to order things at a drive thru
Kinda a cool idea I wonder what happened that it didn’t work out
So you didn’t watch the video I guess.
Yeah I did I’m a truck driver and I wouldn’t ever think that would work but it looked cool in that old show at the end
Looks like something from Space 1999.
W przypadku dzwona z osobówką kierowca nie miałby żadnych szans.
Could've cooled it out the sides. Now it could be an automatic. Single driver, with cameras up top
All around for visibility & clarence..
Poszalałbym takim bez naczepy :>
Not anymore economical than a regular truck.of course not because of that flying brick behind It.
STANCE 🏎️
Oh okay the driver had to go into it to drive that thing
Yes. This is how trucks work.
Why do they no longer run????
@@Kiwi_NZ610 I don't know if they run or not.
They aren't in practical use though, because beyond their awkward design, transportation code works against them.
@@1SqueakyWheel fair enough
En la Argentina se utiliza este concepto en los autobuses de 2 pisos en el cual la cabina de conduccion se encuentra a nivel de un automovil.
NOT a good idea for a large vehicle that takes longer to stop the driver cannot see far enough ahead to anticipate
@@snapon666 - I drove a flat-nose school bus for a little over two years in ‘99/‘00/‘01, and while a large vehicle barreling at high speed does take much longer to stop, that’s just a reason to drive more slowly, and there’s no particular visibility advantage with regard to stopping to be gained by perching up high.
It certainly *feels* more powerful to sit up high: I used to love pulling up to within an inch of someone’s s.u.v. at an intersection before turning the steering wheel, since it freaked those road-hogging suburban morons right out (on a flat-nose, the front bus wheel is behind the bus driver, and so the vehicle’s tight turning radius always surprises other drivers).
But if you need to stop for an obstacle ahead, you can see that obstacle as easily from ground-level as from sitting up five or six feet, obstacles aren’t invisible when looked at head-on.
@@danopticon have to totally disagree,, drove a ford cab over and an international cab over and I worked at the white freightliner plant building new ones ...visibility is a Major benefit of being higher a tractor as low as the one shown would not be able to see beyond the suv in front of them ..the same reason I don't follow behind a vehicle on my bike I want to see around them as far as possible down the road
@@snapon666 - No offense, but the obvious reply is that the s.u.v. ahead of you - and not anything beyond it - is the hazard … and if you’re tailgating that s.u.v. so closely that you need to see *beyond* it to anticipate if *it* may suddenly stop because of whatever *it’s* tailgating, then *you’re already all doing it wrong.*
I also drove a 40-ish ft. Panavision straight-truck around Chicago for a film production company, and driving that thing fully-laden at just 15mph through residential streets, the rules were never to be closer than *50 feet* behind the nearest vehicle, or three-ish car lengths; barreling at 35mph down the average stroad, readers may be surprised to learn one should drive a fully-laden 40-ft. straight truck *no closer than 250 feet* behind the nearest moving vehicle, or *15 to 20 car lengths,* and driving 55mph down the highway (and no faster, because you truly could kill DOZENS of people), *the closest behind another car your truck should be is 350-ish feet, or nearly two football fields’ length.* And in a standstill situation, you *still* leave a full car-length (or two!) between your truck and the car ahead of you, in case that car stalls, so you have room to pull around it without reversing.
That’s what I remember from the Illinois Class B CDL classes and the accompanying test (with passenger, school bus, air brakes, and hazardous materials endorsements), and it’s all worth taking seriously, because it IS life-and-death … for others, even more so than for you.
So again, from a distance of two football fields behind a speeding s.u.v. on the highway, or even from 50 feet behind an s.u.v. driving 15mph down a residential street, what you really need to focus on is that *one s.u.v.,* and whatever’s to its left and right. Does it feel more in-command of everything to have a crow’s nest view of the road ahead? Sure. But if to maneuver properly you absolutely *need* to see around the vehicle ahead of you, then you’re already doing it wrong: you’re not supposed to tailgate so closely that something they do may surprise you, you focus on *the car ahead* and leave *yourself* plenty of room and time to react!!
Now, is the obvious solution to require special licenses for s.u.v. drivers? Absolutely. Get those menaces off the road. Nearly everyone driving an s.u.v. is a jackass with no business driving a tank, just endangering everyone on the road. And nearly 100% of those morons belong in Mini Coopers … or better yet, bikes.
But within the realm of what can be done individually: when driving a truck, just don’t tailgate the moron in the s.u.v.! Many lives may depend on it.
@@danopticon go learn how to ride a motorcycle one of the first things you learn is to look down the road not in front of you and that applies to over the road also ...you can NOT realistically leave 50 ft in front of you on any city street in the US ..that space would immediately be filled by 3 suv's a bicycle and an old lady with a cart ...looking down the road while keeping tabs on the idiot in front of you is just common sense ...you don't want to be surprised
Der kommt doch bestimmt nicht so weit, weil bestimmt von dem Fahrzeug der Stauraum für das Benzin sehr klein ist, vorallem dann wenn dieses flache Fahrzeug mehrere Tonnen mit sich noch mitschieben muss.
Benzin???
Вы скажите где у него находится двигатель?
мне больше интересно куда водителя затолкать
Drei König Lebensmittelservice GmbH & Co KG ubicación del steimwinter super cargo 2040
The highwayman
Looks like a death trap
What they should have done is built power assist into that gigantic trailer and it wouldn't matter what truck you use to pull such heavy equipment. I hope they build large camper trailers with electric power assist motors so i can be moved with a Honda Accord.
Kalo di Indonesia murah mungkin laku aja ya
Back problems? This a truck for you to get into and out of.
tiktok brought me here. 😅
Camionu ăsta e foarte mic niciun șofer nu încape în el
the aero must be so bad... the trailer should have a round front end
And then they tried going up a hill…..
I want it.
SEHARUSNYA TRUK MASA DEPAN DI BUAT SPRTI INI TUK MINIMALKAN KECELAKAAN
Any good lorry driver would love to get behind the wheel of this, don't forget to swing out before them corners and you'd be fine ❤
and one yugo hits it head on and they die instantly
Расхлестаться на нём сразу на глушняк - верный вариант. Мне бы такой аппарат не упал бы ни разу.. 😏
Its an verry old 1980 concept
牽引車の運転手に身長の制限が必要そうなんだが
Certain death for the driver in the wrong kind of accident..
No point if u cant see i n traffic.
Trudno wyobrazić sobie bardziej poroniony pomysł.
if we could remove the right part of the cab and replace it with an radiator on it it could be fixed for the right side of the mirror use camera
hey im genious (dab)
This is dangerous and unsafe!!
Absolutely terrible view for the driver. Bad idea.
To...
dead sea road