Prostate Artery Embolization: Ask Dr. David Field

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 авг 2022
  • David Field, MD, is an interventional radiologist at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and is board-certified in both interventional and diagnostic radiology. Dr. Field has particular interests in prostate artery embolization, renal tumor cryoablation, and the percutaneous treatment of urinary tract obstruction. His approach to patients is centered on an understanding that care begins before and extends beyond a planned procedure and that a thorough, patient, and easily understandable explanation of an intervention is a crucial part of easing anxiety and developing trust. As part of the larger Interventional Radiology staff, Dr. Field recognizes that successful patient care involves a skilled and dedicated team rooted in mutual respect and support. To learn more, visit www.medstarhealth.org/service... or call 202-444-5748.
    :00 Meet Dr. Field
    3:12 What is prostate artery embolization?
    3:33 Why would a man need this procedure?
    4:13 What constitutes a good outcome with this procedure?
    4:36 What is the likelihood of success from this procedure?
    4:48 How long does it take to perform prostate artery embolization?
    5:15 Does the procedure require anesthesia?
    5:32 Does the procedure require a hospital stay?
    5:48 Are the embolic beads permanent?
    6:07 How and why does the prostate shrink?
    6:25 Are there side effects to blocking the blood supply?
    6:37 What is the recovery period after prostate artery embolization?
    7:07 How long before I feel normal and can resume regular activity?
    7:25 Will I have a urinary catheter after the procedure?
    8:17 Will I continue to take prostate medications after this procedure?
    8:37 Can I have this procedure more than once if necessary?
    8:50 Does prostate artery embolization preclude me from having other prostate-related procedures in the future?

Комментарии • 21

  • @JohnMinichiello
    @JohnMinichiello Год назад +13

    5 Weeks after PAE no med's every thing working great sleeping all night .😄

  • @JohnMinichiello
    @JohnMinichiello Год назад +5

    I just had this done PAE on Dec 6th its Dec 8 now = pissed fire and razor blades for two days now the pain is about a 3 from 10 everything working good flow good with little medication soooooo glad I had this done should be the GOLD Standard !

    • @kennymadrid2718
      @kennymadrid2718 Год назад +1

      That's why you always have painkillers handy.

    • @kennymadrid2718
      @kennymadrid2718 Год назад +2

      Did they sedate you before putting in a Foley catheter because I had one put in me with no sedation whatsoever and it hurt like hell!

    • @JohnMinichiello
      @JohnMinichiello Год назад +1

      @@kennymadrid2718 same as you hurt like hell !

    • @johng2116
      @johng2116 Год назад +1

      I'm considering PAE for my enlarged prostate \ BPH. Prior to having PAE procedure, did you take any drugs to control your BPH? Was a foley catheter inserted for the PAE procedure? How is your urination now? Do you take any medication for an enlarged prostate or for pain due to PAE procedure? Thank you

    • @glgl1472
      @glgl1472 9 месяцев назад

      @@johng2116 but to hear the medical professionals say it it's just a little bit uncomfortable they can go f--- themselves

  • @jeffj318
    @jeffj318 Год назад +3

    Great presentation and excellent information.

  • @ClassicalLiberalWarrior
    @ClassicalLiberalWarrior Год назад +1

    Very factual and helpful video. It also seems like this might be the BEST treatment so far. But I wonder if a high-quality hospital like Georgetown University will accept Fidelis Medicaid from NY.

  • @RobCLynch
    @RobCLynch 5 месяцев назад +2

    Can anybody describe the arterial procedure? Can you feel the line moving through your body? Is there any discomfort or pain?

  • @grahamfjlaws6108
    @grahamfjlaws6108 28 дней назад

    I had this done in early 2017 with excellent results. However, the effects now in 2024 are beginning to wane. Next year I'll consider retreatment. I'm wondering if treatment is as effective second time around.

  • @dddoda
    @dddoda Год назад +1

    You say you need to install a catheter before the embolization. Will that involve somehow sedating the patient and numbing the installation? Also can you be more specific than "over time" to see results?

  • @stephengrossman4496
    @stephengrossman4496 10 месяцев назад +1

    I had an allergic reaction to contrast dye. Does that make me ineligible for PAE?

  • @henryjolly1559
    @henryjolly1559 Год назад +1

    I need help

  • @kennymadrid2718
    @kennymadrid2718 Год назад +2

    Are you sedated before they put in the Foley catheter because I had a catheter put in without sedation, worst pain I ever felt in my life.

  • @dddoda
    @dddoda Год назад +1

    Just got to ask: Does after blocking off the blood veins that lead into the prostate possibly cause a backup of the blood in those veins, thereby increasing blood pressure and swelling in the blocked off veins in the body's futile attempt trying to circulate blood in the prostate, have a negative blocking effect on the urethra in the prostate?

  • @pynoun
    @pynoun Год назад +1

    how does this procedure affect sex life ??? no comment so far about this aspect of things ...

    • @RobCLynch
      @RobCLynch 5 месяцев назад +2

      From what I've seen, PAE procedure appears to have the least effect on sexual function.

  • @757MrMark
    @757MrMark 4 месяца назад

    The contrast dye, is that harmful to someone with TYPE II and one kidney ?

  • @glgl1472
    @glgl1472 9 месяцев назад

    Not one word about the amount of radiation that you're exposed to and anything that's health-related to that which is the main reason that's keeping me from having it which tells me they're hiding something it's searched and searched and you're exposed to excessive exceedingly high doses of radiation and it does increase your cancer risk but they don't even talk about it they just gloss over it which seems very duplicitous to me